วีดีโอ

And he is still correct about Jesus's birth date, amazing.

@@Jaco3688 😂😅

Amazing how he got this and other things so wrong

Jesus is merely the King of kings. Only the Almighty is KING of Kings. Also Jesus already came back, him and God tabernacle in the kingdom of God, which is within. So the lion thing is neat, but not quite accurate.

I believe Michael Heiser alluded to this as well but if I remember correctly he believed he was born Sept. 11 3 BC. Which would put his conception almost on Dec 25th. So that would mean Jesus entered the womb at that time, he would have received his earthly body...his tabernacle. The true temple in human form.³

@@timcoil6224 I have no studies in this field of birthdays,.but I've always heard from headlines and word of mouth that Jesus was born in March....

@Charles-mv7sv probably not since the sheep were "still in the fields" indicating fall and by the times indicated by the priest tempke service of John the Baptists father as apparently he was a temple priest. They were able to determine when John the Baptists was conceived, which was 6 months before Mary and they were able to use that info to help them determine and by using a star app with info from the star info in Revelations. Michael Heiser is a good source of this info along with the man who discovered it. The evidence seems pretty air tight (as we can get with current knowledge) as events in the sky at this time were pretty remarkable as one would expect. It is well worth the research on Heiser as well as the man who discovered the events in question. He has a video explaining it all but I forgot to save the link on TH-cam and I forgot his name.

@@Charles-mv7sv , Brother, the Lord JESUS👑YAHSHUA of Nazareth has not come back yet, Bodily, to reign as KING Of Kings on the Throne of His earthly ancestor king David for 1000 years. The Lord is present now with us, via the Holy Spirit. So, His return, physically, to Earth to reign will be Him as a roaring Lion. Blessings!

If you are referring to the Maji, they didn't show up until Jesus was a toddler. They entered the "house" not a stable. He was a young child not a child.

@jimbobjennings8266 .star of Bethlehem

Go look up what happened on September 23rd, 2017. Rev. 12

So then Jesus was conceived around when the west observes Christmas. I find that just as fascinating.

I want the kjv with ruckmans commentary

​@lestrangemd that's when Jesus received his tabernacle...his fleshly body. It was the beginning of when he tabernacled with us

The calendar month called September,,,has it as the ninth month,,, however,,, the word September literally means the,,, seventh month,,, October,,, eighth month November means ninth month and December means ten,,decade,,, tenth month, The calendar is of the devil and his mouth piece the pope who I saw on TH-cam praying to Lucifer which is the devil,,, and the Pope is the mouth piece of Satan. The calendar is a GRAVEN image of false gods paganism, and if you choose one day of the calendar to worship on, your worshipping that false god that that day is dedicated to, and to see what God thinks about this matter,, read Isaiah 1:10-15.

He mentions geocentricity and flat earth in a few recordings

​@@fordhughes Geocentricity and flat earth are not correlated. Not once have I ever heard brother Ruckman speak about the earth being flat (even when he mentions things like the "four corners" he says it's metaphorical because there are 4 directions), and while I don't dare speak for a dead man, I doubt he would waste his time with such nonsense. In fact, I've heard him use some of the verses Flat Earthers use to prove a globe, such as Job 38:14 referencing the earth as a seal, and how in those days most seals were cylindrical seals that you roll across clay and how that is like a globe rotating around the sun. He also speaks extensively on how the moon REFLECTS the sun, that it does not produce its own light (Job 25:5), just as the church (which is compared to the moon) reflects the light of Christ. All of that is contrary to the belief of a Flat Earth. And forget that the earth had days before the sun and the moon were created in genesis (because a day is one spin of the globe and not the position of the sun and moon in the sky), or that the bottomless pit only works with a globe because right at the center of a globe there is no way to go but up, or even non biblical basic concepts like the stars spinning in opposite directions in the different hemispheres. I've found it doesn't matter what I say, or even what Ruckman says, or even what ex-Flat Earthers say when they go down to Antarctica and see a 24 hr sun. People that believe in a flat earth will believe what they want in spite anyone or anything telling them otherwise, as if they have some secret knowledge no one else does. And judging that so many of them go to perverse sources such as the book of Enoch to prove their case, I'm glad I'm not in that group of people. They would rather preach on a flat earth, in most cases, to strangers, than of Christ.

@@LastCall777 well I didn’t say he taught it just that he mentioned it in a few recordings. I know he believed the earth was a globe and was somewhat open to geocentricity. We know the earth appears stationary and that no alleged movement of the earth has ever been recorded. We know bodies of water seek their level. We know that the alleged curvature of the earth is only seen in computer generated images. Celestial observations outside of our understanding don’t negate our terrestrial foundation. Earth is a squared circle (like a wrestling ring) enclosed by a solid firmament. It is the base of the pyramid that makes up the known universe. Thanks for the response and appreciate your channel. Hopefully we can just agree to disagree respectfully like David Hoffman mentions in a recent video he called “Flat earth derangement syndrome.” You should check that one out.

​@@fordhughes He spoke against Flat earth by virtue of day and night being simultaneous in the same time of his coming.

It's in his book, "Black is Beautiful"

They are fallen angels or the mutated off spring from the days of noah.. he believes they might be the great deception

He believes they are fallen angels or the mutated off spring from the days of noah, he says they might be the great deception

​@jacobdavis5387 same thing I think.

th-cam.com/video/rjP9Bf7YJAs/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/YpLD5ctbU2U/w-d-xo.html

Luke 17:27 AMP [27] the people were eating, they were drinking, they were marrying, they were being given in marriage, [they were indifferent to God] until the day that Noah went into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Genesis 6:3 KJV [3] And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

They "WERE" ignorant of the flood during Noah's preaching. But the passage doesn't say that. The passage is speaking presently: "For this they willingly ARE ignorant of". Peter is speaking of the people in HIS day. Not in Noah's day. No one in Peter's day was ignorant of Noah's flood.

​@@LastCall777 False, Peter was not speaking to his day. For this they "ARE" willingly ignorant. Peter is prophetically speaking about scoffers in the LAST DAYS and just like in Noah's time they were ignorant of the coming judgement LIKEWISE in the last days they will also be ignorant to the coming judgement by fire. Because the world is indeed ignorant that the flood even happened, TO THIS DAY most of the world even with geographical evidence and non biblical evidence from other cultures, the world still ignorantly denies that the biblical flood happened and they believe the world just continues as normal since the beginning of creation just as Peter writes.

@lastcall777 False, Peter was not speaking to his day. For this they "ARE" willingly ignorant. Peter is prophetically speaking about scoffers in the LAST DAYS and just like in Noah's time they were ignorant of the coming judgement LIKEWISE in the last days they will also be ignorant to the coming judgement by fire. Because the world is indeed ignorant that the flood even happened, TO THIS DAY most of the world even with geographical evidence and non biblical evidence from other cultures, the world still ignorantly denies that the biblical flood happened and they believe the world just continues as normal since the beginning of creation just as Peter writes.

False Peter was not speaking to his day. For this they "ARE" willingly ignorant. Peter is prophetically speaking about scoffers in the LAST DAYS and just like in Noah's time they were ignorant of the coming judgement LIKEWISE in the last days they will also be ignorant to the coming judgement by fire. Because the world is indeed ignorant that the flood even happened, TO THIS DAY most of the world even with geographical evidence and non biblical evidence from other cultures, the world still ignorantly denies that the biblical flood happened and they believe the world just continues as normal since the beginning of creation just as Peter writes.

“I rejoice at thy word, as one that findeth great spoil.” ‭‭Psalm‬ ‭119‬:‭162‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Nothing like a Bible to clear up a college education.

@ lovely, thank you boss man

The truth undoing the lies

We're leaving soon. Surely.

Ford made it legal again in 1974

Seems to me that heaven was always supposed to be temporary (if the angels were on the earth first with lucifer as the head), and New Jerusalem is the home for the church, not the Jews. We won't have the same bodies as those that inherit the earth, who will be made like Adam and Eve and will marry and have kids and His kingdom will expand forever. We will be made like the angels and won't marry or have children, but will be conformed to the image of Christ. But this is complicated stuff and I won't ever think to be 100% right on anything besides faith in Jesus alone, right now, to get to heaven.

You look up at space (the second heaven) at night right now and it's completely black. Space is black/dark and all the planets, etc. are lifeless/dead and it's so chaotic up there with asteroids smashing into stuff and the comets breaking off from the chaotic Oort Cloud further out there and I don't believe God originally created it that way because he always creates perfection originally. I believe it ended up like that due to the curse of either Adam's sin or back when the fall of Lucifer, the anointed cherub that covereth took place (that's most likely the cause). That would also be an example of it's uncleanness. I wonder in Revelation 21: 1 KJV if the new heaven will be the opposite. Will it be lit up and all the planets will be all habitable? I say yes because God's original creation is always perfect. That would also mean it's clean or pure too. It all makes sense as a whole. The new heaven and the new Earth will also have to be an exact replica of what we have now because the bible mentions the bands of Orion, the Pleiades, etc. and we know God's word is absolute and will never change. Not one star will be out of place in the new heaven. The only difference in the new one is that Satan and evil will have never touched it. The whole chapter of Rev. 21 fascinates me completely! I always find myself studying and thinking about it frequently to gain as much understanding as I can for it.

The gold standard is the best standard 👍

I wonder what it would look like if people started demanding to be paid in gold or silver 🤔

Welcome to the Bible

@@hurleyjcand just maybe beyond that, food would be the main currency

@@greatomega1980 daily bread

You obviously did not know Dr. Ruckman personally, and I would further assert that you had never sat down and discussed with him what he actually knew and what He did not know. Dr. Ruckman was a man of integrity, and if he did not know something he would tell you honestly and directly that he did not know it! But what he knew, he stuck to tenaciously. Now, I did know him! And for 22 years had ample opportunity and the privilege to sit down with him in his office, at "Dinner On The Grounds" as well as at his birthday parties, and under him as both my pastor and Bible teacher at Bible Baptist Church & The Pensacola Bible Institute. You are definitely speaking out of turn, by assumption, sarcasm, and accusation. A little bit of knowledge is often quite dangerous in the hands of those who consider themselves experts because their learning often exceeds the actual capacity of their intellect. 😉 God speed, brother.

@@TONY19021965 I'm glad you have fond memories of the late Peter Ruckman, however while you say he may have been a man of integrity, he certainly was also a man prone to teaching false doctrine, probably without realizing it. That's the problem with many Christians, rampant biblical illiteracy.

If the gap teaching is heresy, tell us when did Lucifer fall, who did God tell Adam & Eve to replace when He told them to replenish the earth, and just how do you explain how the result of God's judgment resulted in the same outcome in Jeremiah 4:22-28 as in Genesis 1:2?🤔 Jeremiah 4:22-28 [22]For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge. [23]I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light. [24]I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. [25]I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled. [26]I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger. [27]For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end. [28]For this shall the earth mourn, and the heavens above be black: because I have spoken it, I have purposed it, and will not repent, neither will I turn back from it. Genesis 1:2 [2]And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. How is it, that you would rather believe in what evolutionists teach, which implies that God is a god of disorder, rather than that He is the God of order, which is what The Holy Bible teaches? Remember, it was without form and void, after it was created. And then darkness was upon the face of the waters. God is light, where did the void and the darkness come from? God? God who dwells in unapproachable light? Gap theory, pig feathers!😅

@TONY19021965 😅😅😅 the term *replenish* is only used in the KJV, is 1611 English translation that uses 17th century English which is long since been replaced by modern english. The term replenish in Genesis 1:28 is the Hebrew word *mal'e* which means to fill, not too fill again. In 1611, *replenish* meant to be replete, or full. The Gap heresy is a damnable demonic false doctrine designed to make the Bible fit with evolutionary deep time/ millions of years.

@TONY19021965 have you not read Ezekiel 28?? In verses 13 to 16 that talks about how Lucifer was a good angel fell into iniquity. Verse 13 says that he was in Eden, The Garden of God!

@peteone111 No, I never read that. But what I did read was that Lucifer was "the anointed cherub that covereth," not an angel. A cherub appears to be a four winged creature, while an angel has no wings and looks more like a man. Exodus 37:9 [9]And the cherubims spread out their wings on high, and covered with their wings over the mercy seat, with their faces one to another; even to the mercy seatward were the faces of the cherubims. Revelation 21:17 [17]And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel. Judges 13:9-11 [9]And God hearkened to the voice of Manoah; and the angel of God came again unto the woman as she sat in the field: but Manoah her husband was not with her. [10]And the woman made haste, and ran, and shewed her husband, and said unto him, Behold, the man hath appeared unto me, that came unto me the other day. [11]And Manoah arose, and went after his wife, and came to the man, and said unto him, Art thou the man that spakest unto the woman? And he said, I am. And then there's the 6 winged seraphim; see Isaiah 6:2, & Revelation 4:8. Lucifer transforms himself into an angel of light as act of deception, but he never was an angel. 2 Corinthians 11:14 [14]And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Now about Eden; there is more than one Eden in The Bible. The Eden in Ezekiel 28:16 is the mount of God's throne on the sides of the north. The Eden of Genesis chps. 1-2 is a garden in a wide place, like an open plain. And there was also another Eden after the flood. You are confusing the locations as if there is only one place with that name. Just like we have a Portland ME, & Portland OR. Germany has at least 4 cities called Munster. Lucifer fell, was cast out of Eden, the garden of God, from off a high place, a mount. He then appears to Eve as a serpent, a common field animal known to Eve in Eden, the garden made by God on earth, not the Eden in Heaven. You ought to spend more time studying your Bible instead of trying to correct those who believe it. See Mark 12:24. Cheers😉

​@peteone111 No, I never read that. But what I did read was that Lucifer was "the anointed cherub that covereth," not an angel. A cherub appears to be a four winged creature, while an angel has no wings and looks more like a man. Exodus 37:9 [9]And the cherubims spread out their wings on high, and covered with their wings over the mercy seat, with their faces one to another; even to the mercy seatward were the faces of the cherubims. Revelation 21:17 [17]And he measured the wall thereof, an hundred and forty and four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of the angel. Judges 13:9-11 [9]And God hearkened to the voice of Manoah; and the angel of God came again unto the woman as she sat in the field: but Manoah her husband was not with her. [10]And the woman made haste, and ran, and shewed her husband, and said unto him, Behold, the man hath appeared unto me, that came unto me the other day. [11]And Manoah arose, and went after his wife, and came to the man, and said unto him, Art thou the man that spakest unto the woman? And he said, I am. And then there's the 6 winged seraphim; see Isaiah 6:2, & Revelation 4:8. Lucifer transforms himself into an angel of light as act of deception, but he never was an angel. 2 Corinthians 11:14 [14]And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Now about Eden; there is more than one Eden in The Bible. The Eden in Ezekiel 28:16 is the mount of God's throne on the sides of the north. The Eden of Genesis chps. 1-2 is a garden in a wide place, like an open plain. And there was also another Eden after the flood. You are confusing the locations as if there is only one place with that name. Just like we have a Portland ME, & Portland OR. Germany has at least 4 cities called Munster. Lucifer fell, was cast out of Eden, the garden of God, from off a high place, a mount. He then appears to Eve as serpent, a common field animal known to Eve in Eden, the garden made by God on earth, not the Eden in Heaven. You ought to spend more time studying your Bible instead of trying to correct those who believe it. See Mark 12:24. Cheers😉