วีดีโอ

Excellent point! Very important to understand our KJV in its English, the English of the translators and not that of 2024.

Why there is no god, dumb Americans

I think he wanted it so that he would practice evil with it. Christmas, Easter, eating swine (pig), turkey, shrimps, etc, are abominations that will send us to the lake of fire if we do not repent. The fact that Revelation says the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus shows that the Word of God must be rightly divided. Christ Jesus expounded, fulfilled, and magnified his perfect loving law of liberty that he gave to prophet Moses. Christians are to keep every law that applies today like the seventh day sabbath, circumcision for males, celebrating the new moons and holy days, wearing 100% God created fabric, not eating the unclean beasts like swine, chicken, turkey, etc. We will not kill a lamb for every sin we commit because Christ Jesus is the Lamb of God. We only need to confess our sins and ask the Holy Ghost to help us stay faithful to Christ Jesus our Lord.

“Nobody is dumber than a Catholic” Who canonized the non apocryphal books? Who instituted the trinitarian belief structure? Who instituted Christ deity? Who casted out Nestorianism and Arianism from early Church? Who preserved the early manuscripts? Who composed the Textus Receptus? Catholics have their faults. Perhaps, more than any other Christian denomination, but they’ve played a larger part in furthering the gospel of Christ than any other church ever in the history of this world.

1. New Wine is indeed non-alcoholic. 2. No, the wine isn’t “new wine” at the Lords supper, and “Drink it new with you” is not referencing to the wine, but the action of drinking the wine. Cross reference to Lamentations 3:23. 3. “Fruit of the vine” is wine. Amos 9:14. 4. In order to have fresh grapes, they must have been able to have been harvested. Harvest season is not the season of Passover, and the grapes or the juice thereof would have been out of season, preserved but prone to fermentation. Jesus drank wine. His disciples drank wine. And the position of non-alcoholic wine is not agreed upon by the historic Christian consensus.

Peter Ruckman always with some good points to shut down the Hereticks and heresies 🙌🏽

Does "the Trail of Blood" come from Baptist Briders?

th-cam.com/video/1KGENd6zX9g/w-d-xo.htmlsi=CIFqlmVvBBjWRbH-

DR PSR,…………ONE OF THE BEST PREACHERS EVER,……….A REAL SOLDIER OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST,………..PRAISE THE LORD,……….. AMEN TO THAT ❤

Praise the Lord 👏 What a blessing to hear the truth from God's Holy Word!!!!!

❤❤Amen!❤❤

He also said 5 times that he WOULD ASCEND ABOVE GOD‼️

So... the Scourby YouBible Channel just uploaded the epistle of barnabas from the codex sinaiticus. I promptly unsubscribed. Just a heads up for ya incase you are also subscribed. I couldn't even bring myself to capitalize any of the video title. Funny that sinaiticus has sin at the beginning of it's name and vaticanus has anus at the end. Oh the endless jokes I could make off of the latter. Like where the pope can shove the vaticanus.

Thank you 🙏🏼 For posting Dr. Ruckman lectures 2024 and this man is still reaching and educating new Christians! Much luv from California

That's good stuff

Revelation 4:1 [1]After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. Revelation 21:1 [1]And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the FIRST heaven and the FIRST earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. Ruckman claimed there were 3 earths. That can't be the case. Rev 21:1 debunks that, and there are other verses to counter that theory as well. God bless you all 😊

Beautiful bro Lotan 📖🗡️ thanks from Lancaster Ohio 🇺🇲

AMEN

"For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven." PSALM 119:89.

3 raptures: OT saints Mt 27:52, church age 1 Thess 4:17, & trib saints Mt 24:31 & Rev 14:14

I was 18 years old, saved, and truly desired to learn more of scripture. That was 1985. I had an NIV my mother gave me, and while reading the footnotes, I noticed the constant references made to Vaticanus. I knew at that time that the Vatican was an evil organization. The Lord leaned over my shoulder and said that something was not right. I went away to school and found a church to attend while receiving an education. One night,a deacon handed me a number of study tapes of Matthew by Dr. Ruckman. The rest is wonderful history. I had my faith restored in God's Holy Book, the KJV. I'm a spoiled sheep grazing on the hills of plenty.

You look tired and depressed and sounded not at all excited about getting married by the way. Do you have to believe the kj is the perfectly preserved inerrant word of god to be saved or do you have to have ever read a bible at all to be saved? 2000 years ago all you needed to do was believe in the blood of jesus to be "saved" and born again. All this artwork and evangelism etc what sort of rewards are you hoping to get? Is hoping to get something for doing something a bit business like? I suppose you could say you are doing it all for the "love" of jesus but being honest in your own lives to those closest to you is hard enough work. I just dont get this religion or relationship you say you have with jesus because you look so depressed and worn out

Ruckman often referred to the "old testament" who was the testator and when did they die? hebrews tells us that a testament only comes in effect when the testator is dead and while they are alive it has no effect. The new testament of Jesus only came into effect when he died so everything before the cross is not new testament.

All very interesting 🧐 lol Good theory brother!

Good video. I'm going to use it in the Bible study I teach.

Well done sir, way to list scripture to interpret scripture. Stay away from the scholars and laodicea church watered down teachings. And most importantly, elevating the KJV

I’m a bit confused also if whether he’s saying that a CHRISTIAN can be actively doing any of these characteristics but they won’t have any Inheritance in the Millennial kingdom? Or is it saying that these people he’s speaking of that are drunkards, effeminate, fornicators, etc. are non believers? Because wouldn’t a person that is for example LGBTQ and actively says God made them that way and says they aren’t in sin, that couldn’t be a True Christian, correct?

Ok….so according to Ruckman’s own definitions and logical reasoning…. every translation is inspired.

Thank you so much for sharing these videos! Some of us are completely new to the KJV Bible, and to Dr. Ruckman

The Gap fact also explains how all these megalithic structures got where they are, IMHO. Great video as always brother. Maranatha King Jesus!!

These video's are very important, thank you for the uploads.

Also John 3:3 one says born of water and the spirit, and one just says born of the spirit. Can someone explain the difference? Thank you

Can anyone explain the dispensation of James 2? Thank you!

The lawless one wanted the body of the one in which the law came from.

I think you left out something very important. The literal translation of the Hebrew in 1:2 is "the Earth BECAME without form and void..." This would provide additional support for the "gap." However, I don't think it's a good idea to use the "fall of Lucifer" in your explanation of the gap theory. That name is not in the correctly-translated Hebrew texts, and if you are going to let the Bible speak for itself, then the passages you site have to be referring to a human king. Also, the Scriptures state that Satan was evil from the beginning, and not that he started out good and decided to become evil. God creates both good and evil, and He created Satan to be the "adversary" for a purpose.

"Lucky for us, we know the bible doesn't make contradictions." Sure, ok.

Your explanation is what I was taught and believed these past 40 years

Amen

#1 There is no gap. #2 If you merely finish reading all of Verse 2, "And darkness was upon the face of the deep." The Earth began as a ball of water, Verse 1 is merely a declaration of what God did. He created the heaven and the Earth. The rest of Genesis goes into the detail of how he did that. There is no Gap Off time.

Kamala was right about the passage of time.

Thank you for this I unexpectedly needed this and you uploaded this yesterday. Been looking at the Minoan Eruption in greece 1500BC which possibly caused the parting of the red/reed sea. The Burkle crater east of Madagascar 4000BC~ possibly being responsible for Noah's flood The end of the Green Sahara period because of the change Axial procession that changes every 13000 years ending around 6000BC being responsible for the disappearance of the Garden of Eden But now thanks to you I have a candidate for the fall of Satan from heaven being possibly the Younger Dryas impact from 12800 years ago I heard of the 2 flood theories in the bible but wasn't convinced but seeing it explained and visualised like this with all the verses really put my mind to race I'll have something to think about for a while now, thank you

Exodus 20:11 KJV For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

Genesis 1 gives us a literal time frame of six literal days that God spoke everything into existence. The first and the last word of Genesis 1 is "In" and "day" these two words show up in the Bible 14,406 There is a 144 hours in 06 literal days 14406 that number equals 7x7x7x7x6=14406 that number also equals 6x2401=14406 6 days 24hrs in 01 or could say it like this 6-literal 24-hour 01-days Thats not all Genesis 6:6 is the 144th verse again there are 144 hours in 6 days Genesis 6 is a representation of the sixth day 6,000th year/6 millennium as a forshadow Jesus says as it was in the days of Noah so shall it be at the coming of the LORD. Well romans is the sixth book of the N.T. and Romans 6:6 is the 144th verse of Romans and is literally the fulfillment of the allegorical/forshadowing of the flood/cleansing of the earth the OLD MAN/ OLD WORLD was crucified think about it God sanctified the earth killing everything. Romans 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. All of that really happened its real history its allegorical and a foreshadow too meaning it happened and it also had symblic meaning. So it was the flood that sanctified the earth and destroyed the Old world/Old man. Romans 6:3Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: 6Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. God is a God of order the O.T. events paint a picture of what God was planning to do and really happened and are real history some will say will its just written for symbolic meaning it didnt really happen. They are dead wrong everything written in Our beloved KJB is truth and no lie is of the truth. Also "in" and "day" are found 777+77x in Genesis and revelation. Also "in" and "day" is found in all books accept Genesis and revelation in the KJB 13,552 that = 16×11×77. So "in" and "day" The whole KJB14406=7×7×7×7×6=6×2401 Revelation + Genesis 777×77 All book accept Genesis +Revelation 16×11×77. If you want to see the proof of this I can semd you the pure Bible study count on all claims.

Dear brother, this is the most succinct teaching on the Gap in existence. PTL! I believe you covered the most "hard-hitting" passages in this, this is awesome. Gen 9:1 really rounds out the "replenish" definition and argument, as the Lord uses the same wording with Noah as He did with Adam - he tells him to be fruitful, multiply, and "replenish" the earth. Also, I think the context of Jeremiah 4 refers to the Tribulation (vs 29-31), not Noah's flood. I think you nailed the quickest and most convincing arguments "scripture with scripture" for "replenish" and "without form and void", followed by the universal flood in 2 Peter. As you said, it can't be Noah's flood in 2 Peter as both the heavens and the earth were flooded (3:5, 3:7) - "the heavens were of old" vs "the heavens and the earth which are NOW"... Noah's flood had nothing to do with "the heavens." Amen! 🙏

Concise, helpful and very well made video, thank you brother.

The five worlds: 1). The world that then was (2Peter3:6), 2). The old world (2Peter2:5), 3). The present evil world (Galatians1:4), 4). The world to come (Hebrews2:5), 5). The world without end (Ephesians3:21). Brother Paul Lucas teaches on this on Hillview Baptist Church channel. It is the gap fact, yes.

“If the Old Testament is understood as a foreshadowing, then one sees that the true Jews of the Old Testament are foreshadowing of Christians, since all true Jews of the Old Testament live spiritually in expectation of Christ the Savior, the Messiah. On the other hand, their enemies in the Old Testament are a foreshadowing of contemporary Judaism, that is those who either consciously or unconsciously confess the Jewish religion, the very foundation of this religion being a rejection of Christ. Once one accepts the Christian Gospel, traditional Judaism loses its validity. The Jewish religion which accepts Christ is the Christian religion.”

I am also a believer of the gap. God also told Noah after the flood the same thing He told Adam. Gen 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.

The heavens and the earth = space and matter. Therefore, the earth being without form and void refers to planets and stars not yet having come together. "Earth" here does not mean the planet we live on. That would be referred to as "the world," and it does not seem to be the case here.

😆 "LUCKILY FOR US..." 😆 THAT'S A CONTRADICTION! THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN GOD DON'T BELIEVE IN LUCK... I'LL THROW IN KARMA AS A BONUS. 🤪