Key West Sicilian
Key West Sicilian
  • 54
  • 68 074

วีดีโอ

EBL talk Phenomenology vs. Empiricism
มุมมอง 1721 วันที่ผ่านมา
EBL talk Phenomenology vs. Empiricism
Charls Carroll and Jay Dyer talk Tolkien and CS Lewis
มุมมอง 74หลายเดือนก่อน
Charls Carroll and Jay Dyer talk Tolkien and CS Lewis
Luis J. Gomez reacts to Jake Flores getting punched at UCLA protest
มุมมอง 902 หลายเดือนก่อน
Luis J. Gomez reacts to Jake Flores getting punched at UCLA protest
IT’S MEL TIME!
มุมมอง 652 หลายเดือนก่อน
IT’S MEL TIME!
Robert Sepehr gets pressed on a twitter space
มุมมอง 702 หลายเดือนก่อน
Robert Sepehr gets pressed on a twitter space
EMJ vs. Ben Shapiro on Abortion
มุมมอง 775 หลายเดือนก่อน
EMJ vs. Ben Shapiro on Abortion
Mark Brahmin DECLARES a THARGELIA on the PHARMAKOI Keith Woods and Joel Davis!!!
มุมมอง 513ปีที่แล้ว
Mark Brahmin DECLARES a THARGELIA on the PHARMAKOI Keith Woods and Joel Davis!!!
Roosh V gets pranked by Jay Dyer
มุมมอง 615ปีที่แล้ว
Roosh V gets pranked by Jay Dyer
Noomakhia Lecture 10. Noomakhia in the 21st Century - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 321ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 10. The Noomahia in XXI century. 1. Noological analysis of present situation. 2. Globalization, anthropology of Post-3. Modernity, Artificial intelligence, artificial 5. immortality, Post-humanism, feminism, EU. Post-liberalism. 4. Russia in noology. 5. Is the restoration of Logos of Apollo possible? 6. The problem of Dyonysus today.
Noomakhia Lecture 9. Serbian Logos - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 176ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 9. Serbian Logos 1. Serbs as southern slavs. Indo-European level of Serbian identity. 2. Serbian peasantry. Slavic matriarchy (Gasparini). Piatak. Vila. Mother Friday. Lepenski Vir, Vincha cultures. 3. The factor of Thracians, Illyrians. 4. White Serbia. Serbian came to Balkan. From where? Polabian slavs. Luzhitza. Sorbs. The style of Polabian slavs - sarmatians (Scythians) Pure Turanic...
Noomakhia Lecture 8. Noological Analysis of Modernity - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 387ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 8. Noological analysis of Modernity 1. The Modernity as paradigmatic phenomenon. The structure of Modernity is based on the denial of Tradition (Guenon, Evola, Schuon, Burkhardt, Valsan, Nasr). What Tradition destroys Modernity? The answer is clear: apollonian Logos in form of Christianity. 2. The origins of scientific world picture reveals the special philosophical tendency - atomism o...
Noomakhia Lecture 7. Christian Logos - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 354ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 7. Christian Logos. 1. Noological analysis of Christianity is not dogmatic but based on typology. 2. The main structure of Christianity is heavenly patriarchy and verticality. God is Father and He is in Heaven. He is transcendent from creature so it is Logos of Apollo. Hence Platonism and Aristotelian logic in Joan Damascine and scholastics. 3. In Christology we see Dionysian features: ...
Noomakhia Lecture 6. European Civilization - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 290ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 6. European civilization 1. European civilization is based on the titanomachia. Its center is problem of Dionysus. 2. When we define Dionysus as Sun and male principle we interpret him in the perspective of Indo-European civilization. It is the apollonian Dionysus - Olympian one. He is the Son of God and belong to the Heaven. So Zeus promised to him his own throne. He is the King of fut...
Noomakhia Lecture 5. Logos of Dionysus - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 447ปีที่แล้ว
Lecture 5. Logos of Dionysus. The superposition of two existential horizons creates noological field of titanomachia. The Logos of Apollo confronts the Logos of Cybele in third function - in the culture of European peasantry. That is the moment of Dionysus. The vine and the wheat. Short circuit. Bachofen explains Dionysus as the form of patriarchal conquest of the matriarchal agrarian society. ...
Noomakhia Lecture 4. Logos of Cybele - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 863ปีที่แล้ว
Noomakhia Lecture 4. Logos of Cybele - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
Noomakhia Lecture 3. Logos of Indo-european civilization - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 635ปีที่แล้ว
Noomakhia Lecture 3. Logos of Indo-european civilization - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
Noomakhia Lecture 2. Geosophy - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 590ปีที่แล้ว
Noomakhia Lecture 2. Geosophy - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
Noomakhia Lecture 1. Introduction - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
มุมมอง 2Kปีที่แล้ว
Noomakhia Lecture 1. Introduction - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)
Why is Beauty Truth | E. Michael Jones
มุมมอง 302ปีที่แล้ว
Why is Beauty Truth | E. Michael Jones
Monarchy Vs Democracy, Americanism & Civic Religion - Jefferson Lee & Jay Dyer
มุมมอง 1.8Kปีที่แล้ว
Monarchy Vs Democracy, Americanism & Civic Religion - Jefferson Lee & Jay Dyer
Wendell goes in on DeSantis, BAP, & the NatCon Mafia Network (Midterm Election Coverage)
มุมมอง 186ปีที่แล้ว
Wendell goes in on DeSantis, BAP, & the NatCon Mafia Network (Midterm Election Coverage)
Costin Alamariu VS Bill Kristol (2016)
มุมมอง 21Kปีที่แล้ว
Costin Alamariu VS Bill Kristol (2016)
Alexander Dugin's speech at the XXIV World Russian People's Council
มุมมอง 465ปีที่แล้ว
Alexander Dugin's speech at the XXIV World Russian People's Council
Julius Evola - The Dada Experience
มุมมอง 197ปีที่แล้ว
Julius Evola - The Dada Experience
Alexander Dugin on Nick Land & OOO
มุมมอง 334ปีที่แล้ว
Alexander Dugin on Nick Land & OOO
.
มุมมอง 86ปีที่แล้ว
.
King Charles on Traditionalism & Modernity
มุมมอง 2.4Kปีที่แล้ว
King Charles on Traditionalism & Modernity
Dugin’s Twin Peaks Review
มุมมอง 362ปีที่แล้ว
Dugin’s Twin Peaks Review

ความคิดเห็น

  • @turquoiseturkey7824
    @turquoiseturkey7824 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Creflo “Pastor Dollar”

  • @abedrahat3898
    @abedrahat3898 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    X is for beginners, being racist in a public forum is hard. Mainstream Republicans don't want to associate themselves with racism.

  • @nunaalsoknownasohare6388
    @nunaalsoknownasohare6388 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The line about destroying feminism is probably the most misinterpreted line in this whole manifesto ... futurists didn't want to get rid of women's rights, they wanted to turn women into men, essentially, by the abolishment of femininity as a concept! The futurists believed the revolutionary spirit was male, so in order to make women more revolutionary, they must become more manly They were an absolutely insane bunch, progressive and regressive at the same time in all the weirdest ways, and have a legacy that to this day influences both the left and the right, shame they're so forgotten

  • @----t----1234
    @----t----1234 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m closer to BAPs point of view on this topic but he clearly came off as stupid in this clip and was just regurgitating simple statements not unlike you would see in the comment section of some trashy blog. He’s reduced to just saying Kristol is wrong about everything (even if it may be somewhat truthful) but can’t apply any merit to his own arguments or refute anything. Also lol at citing Anne Coulter, embarrassing.

  • @Jigsaw0097
    @Jigsaw0097 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gotta start naming the Tribe more. It’s not just “the bankers” my friends.

    • @seminoleboy96
      @seminoleboy96 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      good way to get demonitized

  • @inevafreeze4476
    @inevafreeze4476 หลายเดือนก่อน

    globalist are less than a joke

  • @MakedonskaAkropolaMKD
    @MakedonskaAkropolaMKD หลายเดือนก่อน

    Apart from being a Lacanist, Slavoj Žižek is a perfect embodiment of the western imagination of how a philosopher should look like! - In their eyes he is a Platon-lookalike, or Sokrat or Aristotle, they all must've looked like that, right?

  • @nkoppa5332
    @nkoppa5332 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lacan and zizek don’t say anything. They have no thesis. They have no meat.

  • @ivanbohatov2072
    @ivanbohatov2072 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By that logic there are almost no true philosophers in our history. The most common problem in learning philosophy is that you can't fully understand the work of a certain philosopher without understanding their predecessors, and you can't fully understand them without reading their sources of inspiration. dugin is full of bs, as expected.

    • @nkoppa5332
      @nkoppa5332 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Incorrect.

    • @ivanbohatov2072
      @ivanbohatov2072 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nkoppa5332 I'm quite sure that I'm more qualified to talk on this topic than you are. Especially after you couldn't even bring up any contr argument

    • @nkoppa5332
      @nkoppa5332 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ivanbohatov2072 you did not really give any reasons why dugin is BS. There are many true philosophers. Reading their sources is necessary. Lacan and psycho analysis are not actually philosophies b

    • @ivanbohatov2072
      @ivanbohatov2072 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nkoppa5332 there is a reason why you can find books on psychoanalysis (generally) only in libraries of philosophy departments and not psychology. It's a giagantic part of 20th century philosophical thought. I gave a reason why Dugin's take on Zizek is bs. 99% of phylosophy can be described as "taking your favorite phylosopher's ideas and expanding on them", the same thing Zizek has done with Lacan and Hegel. Also Dugin avoids the fact that Zizek is a Hegelian, and Lacan he uses as a prysm to reinterpret and expand Hegelian thought.

  • @77missconduct
    @77missconduct 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know people are judgemental towards Roosh, as a listener to some of his interviews, he seems very astute and insightful . As a woman, I get the impression I should not defend him, but I have much respect, as he's adult enough to admit his former life as a sex addict was not the best path to be on.

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ill have to revisit this later. Seems like this lecture would be better appreciated with a syllabus of some kind. Maybe his book or some physical visual reference point. Like a visual aid.

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I keep finding myself trailing off, seeking my dopamine elsewhere, only to be reeled in by some odd physical visualization used as an analogy

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While i respectfully agree with the majority of his statements so far, i find myself searching desperately for more meat, picking around the potatoes of this meandering intellectual stew.

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There was a couple lines at like 15% in that seemed eerily reminiscent of earlier 1900s philosophers which speak endlessly of the framework of their philosophy while speaking little of its substance. I guess thats to be expected of a metaphysicist specifically, more than your usual philosopher tho.

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There's even cursory exploratory evidence for plant lifes "thought" via electrical signals... i mean its... ya know. Not saying its a fact.

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont believe his understanding of conscience or thinking to be even remotely accurate to any studies on animal neurology

  • @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM
    @YouTubeisAmassiveSCAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ive noticed that as we aspire to these sort of intellectual heights that we truly are trailblazing... barriers between languages seem to subside

  • @StaurosPapadakis
    @StaurosPapadakis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Τη λέει ο καραγκιόζης? Καλό είναι να εργάζεσαι για το μέλλον,αλλά με το να καταστρέψεις μουσεία για ποιό λόγο?

  • @heretohelp3955
    @heretohelp3955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do u like this

    • @JohnDoe_1483
      @JohnDoe_1483 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol is this Jiu Jitsu Joe on an alt?

  • @frankgilliland
    @frankgilliland 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Costin told the truth in a question and got a lie in the answer.... brilliant

  • @alinbarba1418
    @alinbarba1418 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you for these, hvala from România!

  • @Frippa340
    @Frippa340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Give an army to this man.

    • @DogeickBateman
      @DogeickBateman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He got one, failed almost instantly

    • @Frippa340
      @Frippa340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DogeickBateman Maybe you're confusing him with D'Annunzio?

    • @eremitaorgao
      @eremitaorgao หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol

  • @HyperXcube
    @HyperXcube 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Based

  • @akhiosas
    @akhiosas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Total macrobian victory

  • @cheeseretard
    @cheeseretard 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strong jewish accent

    • @katla3393
      @katla3393 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Another win for the Jews

  • @RiccardoBarone-qi8zz
    @RiccardoBarone-qi8zz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fake

  • @abdulwahabjag
    @abdulwahabjag 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    make sure to stretch before starting and have a buddy to spot you

  • @abdulwahabjag
    @abdulwahabjag 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol the clip never gets old. “NO, IN REAL LIFE”

  • @abdulwahabjag
    @abdulwahabjag 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Look b-tch, I got dat garlic”

  • @cannibalholocaust3015
    @cannibalholocaust3015 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bill Kristol never has to live with consequences of his own politics. He can live well away from that which he advocates , like most talking heads.

  • @jesse1172
    @jesse1172 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Notice how quickly bill “kristol” speaks. million words a minute! Indicative of extreme high stress; cortisol and estrogen. Flushed red face, drooping saggy skin, fat flabby belly with skinny appendages. Cushings syndrome no doubt.

  • @rodionglazkov1136
    @rodionglazkov1136 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Groyped, lol

  • @DougFischer
    @DougFischer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes hello

  • @Ryan-qj7jq
    @Ryan-qj7jq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Muh name Jamal

  • @______638
    @______638 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Benny likes to bs the gois.

  • @xxxmm-wr3jx
    @xxxmm-wr3jx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Doomed from the start.” Well, this is where Dugin's prescriptive-descriptive model of Noomakhia shows all its weakness. Ethnosociology functioned precisely on its equivocal character. Starting from the idea that there are united forms versus dissociated forms, any political action becomes a simulacrum - even his fourth theory appears as badly dissociated. We will naturally not know any more about what “returning to authenticity” means. Yes, even in Russia and in Serbia. He can hardly be followed, because there's nothing there to follow. edit : And I wrote this comment before the Questions and Answer Time. The answers of Dugin sumed it up pretty well lol

  • @mysnackr
    @mysnackr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Proto-incel. He had total mommy issues, so he hated women..

  • @havinfun8552
    @havinfun8552 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    around 3rd minute Roosh noticed it's a prank and started to troll back. Ended owning the caller.

  • @ShareefusMaximus
    @ShareefusMaximus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can see why they ban him everywhere. Liberalism doesn't have an answer for his criticisms. So they just slander him though 6 degrees of separation guilt by association and never engage with his contentions.

    • @ImUpsetThatYouStoleMyUsername
      @ImUpsetThatYouStoleMyUsername 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suppose? I mean it's pretty niche stuff. I think most of the opposition probably relates to his opinions on foreign policy. I think honestly a lot of my American contemporaries, particularly politicians, are still in a panic-state. They view Russia as like.. gypsies or something. Like this guys teachings is some... duplicitous scam to metaphysically pose us against ourselves.. something like that. It's like modern day witch hunt bullshit. The lecture was... decent. Enjoyable. They almost give it more merit by banning it.

  • @the_wandering_one
    @the_wandering_one 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Winthropian.

  • @emZee1994
    @emZee1994 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BAP is king always

  • @flock221
    @flock221 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A bad showing for both men, I would say.

  • @trannystomper88
    @trannystomper88 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Words to live by

  • @bigbeautifulape5283
    @bigbeautifulape5283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can really see Dugin's true satanic spirit coming to the fore in this clip, in the seething envy he holds for Zizek. He's also completely ignorant of Zizek's work. Zizek has no original ideas? Dugin is nothing but pure hubris and seething jealousy. Typical fascist.

  • @rishabhaniket1952
    @rishabhaniket1952 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many serious intellectuals have called Lacan a fraud or shaman.

  • @dAvrilthebear
    @dAvrilthebear 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyway, his "Sublime Object of Ideology" seemed really impressive to me, how he put a psychological spin into social processses. But I'm a pure novice in philosophy.

  • @hedgerowhell
    @hedgerowhell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Costin 👑

  • @christophersurnname9967
    @christophersurnname9967 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is this from? And is that really BAP's voice asking the questions?

    • @Daniel-pc2ov
      @Daniel-pc2ov 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely BAP, not sure where this is from though.

    • @jw6487
      @jw6487 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      It’s overlayed by AI this man Costin is just a dude no worry frend

  • @terwin6616
    @terwin6616 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what night

  • @morocotopo3905
    @morocotopo3905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone who has a sound understanding of the literature on Hegel knows that the books Zizek wrote in the early nineties (esp Tarrying with the Negative and For They Know Not What They Do) were groundbreaking in philosophical terms. Zizek's reading of how Hegel ontologised Kant seems obvious now but it wasn't back then, let alone the relation between psychoanalysis and German idealism.

    • @dAvrilthebear
      @dAvrilthebear 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe yes. Personally the connection between German idealism and psychoanalysis is what I found to be most interesting in Zizek. But probably this is boring for a professional philosopher.))

    • @alexhauser5043
      @alexhauser5043 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Psychoanalysis is bollocks, the paradigmatic 'Phoenician' pseudoscience.

    • @ivanbohatov2072
      @ivanbohatov2072 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexhauser5043 for it to be pseudoscience psychology should become a science. Psychoanalisis is as much pseudoscience as philosophy is.

    • @alexhauser5043
      @alexhauser5043 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ivanbohatov2072 Modern psychology does, in fact, purport to be a (natural) science. Freud did not present his work as so many observations and reflections (as Schopenhauer had), but as Real Clinical Medical Science (tm). He was a drug-addicted lunatic who wrote nothing that was both true and original.