Noomakhia Lecture 9. Serbian Logos - Alexander Dugin (Serbia 2018)

Lecture 9. Serbian Logos
1. Serbs as southern slavs. Indo-European level of Serbian identity.
2. Serbian peasantry. Slavic matriarchy (Gasparini). Piatak. Vila. Mother Friday. Lepenski Vir, Vincha cultures.
3. The factor of Thracians, Illyrians.
4. White Serbia. Serbian came to Balkan. From where? Polabian slavs. Luzhitza. Sorbs. The style of Polabian slavs - sarmatians (Scythians) Pure Turanic. Differences with sclavins (bulgarians).
5. The relations with Byzance. Orthodoxy. Katekhonic concept.
6. Nemanici. Raska as new kingdom. Saint Sava holy Athos mountain tradition. Patriarchy of Pech.
7. The Empire. Byzantine - Bulgarian, Serb, Valachia, Russia.
8. Dushan the Strong. The control over Balkans.
9. Kosovo battle - the decision of King Lazar: fight, loose in order to resurrect. Nebesko zarstvo. Pure Iranian sequence - forces of Light loose forces of Darkness win. Eschatological aspect.
10. Conservation of Serbian identity during Ottoman era.
11. Serbian revival Vuk Karadjuc, Peter II Njegosh, Platonism. Milosh Zernianski: Serbian Dasein - where Serbia is?
12. After Ottomans. Great Serbia as eschatological project. Serbian dynasties.
Yougoslavia as simulacrum. Archeomodern. Non modern nature of Serbian identity.

[@xxxmm-wr3jx]

“Doomed from the start.” Well, this is where Dugin's prescriptive-descriptive model of Noomakhia shows all its weakness.
Ethnosociology functioned precisely on its equivocal character. Starting from the idea that there are united forms versus dissociated forms, any political action becomes a simulacrum - even his fourth theory appears as badly dissociated. We will naturally not know any more about what “returning to authenticity” means. Yes, even in Russia and in Serbia. He can hardly be followed, because there's nothing there to follow.
edit : And I wrote this comment before the Questions and Answer Time. The answers of Dugin sumed it up pretty well lol