วีดีโอ

Good find!

Where did you get that book of common prayer? Do you have a link for it?

Hey man, please do a review or a video on the New Cambridge Paragraph Bible that you have there. I cannot find nearly anyone online with a review of the latest leather edition like you have

The NLT is one of the only modern translations that has gotten BETTER with each revision. Sadly, is basically the only Bible that tells you if the "you" is singular OR plural. ( see John 3:7) The CSB was not an improvement to the Holman Bible translation. I have the "Jewish Annotated New Testament". It is really sad that there is anti-Jewish HATE in the hearts of many "christians". ( Such people might want to re-read ROMANS 11:21!!!!!!!) There are some verses that I have researched/compared over the years. ( I know it is not possible to have EVERYTHING in one translation.) Such as: Matt. 1:2, Matt. 3:1, Matt. 5:2, Matt. 7:1, Matt. 7:7, Matt. 20:20, Matt. 28:18-20, Mark 7:19, Mark 15:13, Luke 3:33, Luke 16:13, Luke 16:19-31, John 1:5, John 3:16, John 5:10, John 11:35, John 21:15-17, Acts 14:13, Acts 16:37, Acts 19:15, Rom. 10:4, 1 Cor. 7:1, 2 Cor. 8:1, Gal. 3:1, Eph. 2:8, Phil. 2:7, 2 Tim. 3:16, Heb. 11:31, James 1:1, 2 Peter 2:4, 1 John 2:2, Rev. 6:8, Rev. 20:11, and others.

Great. I enjoy dictionaries.

I was looking for English dictionary reviews. Thanks. I have the two smaller ones in your video (but different designs) and a Webster's New World College Dictionary 4th. I realize M-W is now in 11th and New World in 5th editions.

I remember using windows 98 as a little kid, and getting a talking to for breaking the space bar while playing a computer game. I also used some really old photoshop edition that was free to help get through college. Its funny seeing the digital versions of these books and stationary when I have the real stuff on my shelf. Now if I could find one of those ASV logos study bibles that would be neat!

I am surprised/impressed by the functionality of this version (1.6), which seems to be more than commensurate with my memory of pre-Windows95. This version would be almost tolerable to me even now, with the single addition of a mouse with scroll wheel capabilities.

This was super cool and I had totally forgotten about it. I really enjoyed seeing this again so thanks for sharing.

Super cool! Reminds me of when I used computers! (Other than my phone)

I believe in my home we jumped straight from some DOS thingummy right to Windows 95. This was a fun tour; thanks for taking us along!

This is awesome! It combines one of my two major interests, The history of the Bible and Computers!

I apologize for how loud those mouse clicks are - I had the USB mic too close to the mouse.

You just solved my problem. I'm so glad you decided to post your video. I am making one this weekend. Not to be a complete copy cat, mine will be yellow.

DISNEY IS SATAN

The Rolling Stones as performance-enhancing drugs? Far out. The older I get the more I'm convinced that the horrors we imagine the future will hold never come to pass; instead, we get different, totally unforseen horrors. Thanks for sharing this, my friend. You win the internet for this weekend, at least.

Trump "Little Horn"

Some things are so correct while others are obviously incorrect. And some are striking parallels like the American Flag with a peace symbol. What do we see every June (hint)? The most correct one I think is the security state monitoring everyone gathering intel for an anti-Christ. We see that happening today for those who are aware.

You find the most interesting Bibles and this was quite interesting and different. I had never heard of Salem Kirban until I watched this video. Thanks for sharing this.

Quite a coincidence, this. I’m currently reading through the Salem Kirban Reference Bible. It’s a traditional (not new Scofield) KJV text, with every page including some uncontroversial commentary by Kirban and Cohen or a Spurgeon devotional. There is some (single colour, and not distracting) highlighting of prophetic passages throughout, and the book of Revelation is replaced with the complete text of Kirban’s Revelation Visualised, per your NT. It must have been quite a popular Bible in its day, as my copy dated 1992 (published by AMG) claims to be the fifth printing since its original publication in 1979. I paid a king’s ransom for a new-old-stock copy; it’s a very rare book here in the UK where Salem Kirban is almost completely unknown.

Well, Sir, of five years of old Bible and book reviews on YT, between the two of us and friends included, this book is BY FAR the BEST and strangest Bible ever. Wonderfully weird and downright priceless! Bravo, Sir, Bravo

Start with 666 he has a better more accurate view of the coming world being 1970 .what ever you do don't cherry pick parts of books read with a grain of salt and watch for the results

Unbelievable price for this book here in the UK, over £75.00 in 'fair' condition, close to £100.00 in 'very good' condition.

First Scofield Bible was published in 1909 then updated in 1917 if I’m not mistaken.

Good day. May the blessings of the Lord be with you. Please, the Lord has placed it upon my heart to donate Gideons New Testament Bible (Pocket Size) to a basic school in a rural community in Volta region, Ghana. I will be needing about 300 pieces of them. I will kindly like to know the procedure for procuring them.

I have a local goodwill here in my city where I live, and I found a Gideons pocket NT w/ ps+Prv in HARDCOVER. I have NEVER seen a Gideons pocket Bible in hardcover in my entire life so I bought it right away for 50 cents. It's in immaculate condition in dark blue with gold lettering on the cover + spine, also has gold gilded pages. I take it with me on the road when I know I'll be stuck in the car or in an appointment. Translations don't really matter to me because that's why The Lord gave us the spirit of discernment, so regardless of whatever translation you prefer, don't let a lukewarm Bible pharisee tell you otherwise, because that's what the devil wants, he want's to create strife through foolish arguments. "Paraphrased" bibles are the only ones I stay far away from.

I could never relate with all the right hand language as a left handed myself. It was connoted that the left hand was dirty and less than.

Jesiuts infiltrated th printing press bible, n cunningly changing th WORD

Must WATCH A LAMP IN TH DARK ,TARES AMONG WHEAT ADULLAM FILMS

These are E P I C ! The hunt is on for my own set. Thanks for sharing

That was a bottom of the lineup for Fisher. Fisher did make some highend equipment. However, that one came out of one of their rack systems.

Excellent find. I wish they still made these.

Nice idea I have a x370 and not compatible. Thks again

Is God & Lord removed too?

Jesus did not exclude women from salvation, neither did he with his message.. If you point this out to me, please let me know, because I haven't found it yet. Come to find out, neither did St. Paul, according to the manuscripts.. 🤨

Nice discussion of the five Bibles. I agree with your assessment of both the REB and the NRSV. If you appreciate ecumenical Bibles you might check out the JPS Bible (Hebrew Bible only, of course) and the NABRE (New American Bible Revised Edition). The JPS and the NABRE often deal with "problem" passages differently than the NRSV or NRSVUE resolve them, but both are every bit as ecumenical as the NRSV. A good reading Bible, I find, is the Jerusalem Bible. I read the original 1966 version in French, but the English translation is almost as good. If you like the NABRE, you might consider the Catholic Study Bible (NABRE), which has plentiful notes and cross-references and also 400+ pages of commentary ("Reading Guide"), which I find very useful. There's hardly anything in the NABRE that is uniquely Catholic, even in the notes and commentary. It's just a solid academic Bible. If you speak French, the best ecumenical Bible by far is the Traduction Oecumenique de la Bible (TOB), a kind of scholarly, ecumenical revision of La Bible de Jerusalem. My favorite Spanish language Bible is the Biblia Latinoamerica (NOT La Biblia Latinoamericana, which is La Biblia de Jerusalen), which is very easy to read but decidedly Roman Catholic in flavor. A solid Bible with a wide range of mostly conservative notes is the NET Bible. The NET isn't really for reading, but is an excellent resource for broadly conservative commentary. I find myself using it more than the ESV Study Bible. PM 2024

Years ago I heard a scholar say that only the Father was used because of the authority aspect in the Bible. He also mentioned we have wisdom dancing before him as a woman in the original language as Sophia. Can I speculate a male female relationship in the divine? My answer is yes. But would I translate the Father as YHWH-Sophia? My answer is no as I would retain the authority aspect of the original.

I’m a Reformed protestant but my grandmother was Greek and Orthodox and was very devout so I will have no trouble using this through from Septuagint not Hebrew Masoretic.

It wouldn't be quite so bad if it simply said Parent. Instead, it gives the impression of two parents; Metzger was right to criticize this kind of translation method.

That really is a great find, even for a disappointing translation. And the extra paperwork make that a no-brainer. Nice to hear your youngest making her TH-cam debut!

Great review. I still use the 1662 for Sunday Evensong. As a lifelong Anglican who became Lutheran a few years back, I have yet to find any Lutheran prayer book that can surpass the BCP. We have some great prayer books, but nothing like THE Prayer Book!

Doesn't their Marxist changes of using silly twisted euphemism fails terribly? the nouns are far better for sick people such as demonis, epileptics than people with adjectives/diseases. Prost;tute is still quite offensive as wh*re, why not go for "adult entertainer", escort, lol?

for DSS theres a free website for dss english site something citing all changes in the DSS with MT

thanks, i downloaded the pdf from google search NRSVue Bible Sampler Review filetype:pdf

It was an interesting find but not something that I would read. Still, I enjoyed your video.