วีดีโอ

I think its more essential you get a personality <3

music is distracting but content is helpful

Build the wall, deport them all

❤️❤️

A so rich and condensate knowledge that I have to make breaks in order to assimilate it (not ironically).

I have an undiagnosed fatal condition... I am not a hypochondriac... Nor am I a Google "Doctor"... I have a background in biochemistry and statistics... And I also set up the scenario of not telling any of my friends what the condition was nor any of the symptoms... To combat my own conformation bias... And several have on their own pointed out concern about symptoms they've seen... Each person has brought up a different issue as my condition continues to deteriorate... Without any mention from me... Except them watching me continue to get worse and suffer and struggle more as time goes on... The condition can be fatal within less than year if not caught and treated rather early on... it typically has a life expectancy of around 7 years and my first symptoms started really started affecting my day to day about 6 years ago... So I'm not very happy about the circumstances but I'm dealing with it the best I can... So yes my weight will cost me my life... But not because of the extra weight... But the indifference of society and the bias that runs rampant within the medical community that couldn’t see past my Size and see me the same as any other patient as someone afraid and suffering and seeking not only relief... But at least maybe an answer or a cause... O and btw the conditions are completely unrelated to my weight...

I loved this video! Subscribed to the channel. I look forward to seeing what you guys have in store!

Hi, is possible to include financial difficulties and farm environment on farmer’s lived experiences?

What utter garbage. This woman wants bi women to be excepted by lesbians, but as all the people know, 84% of bi women end up in a heterosexual relationship. What right minded thinking lesbian would be in such a relationship knowing there's only a 16% chance that a bi woman will stay with her.

Hi Juan. Thanks for the presentation. Is there any danger that this kind of model is vulnerable to over-fitting?

I found it very difficult to follow what was being said, because of the music. If TH-cam allowed two tracks, one for music and the other for narrative, I would _always_ turn the music off - unless it's a music video, of course. Never in my life did I walk into a lecture theatre where the lecturer put music on speakers before he started speaking, but for some reason, TH-camrs feel that it's essential for a proper presentation.

Can you help me

I am really eager to make my model of sem in ucinet and compare it

Dear Joanna, I am interesting of someone to learn me how to use ucinet

The connection of COVID to anti-fat stigma makes a lot of sense to me. As a fat person, you don't present at the doctor with shortness of breath unless you truly feel you are dying, because you expect to be told it's because you need to lose weight.

Great presentation. A small step in a much needed direction. Understanding what generates solidarity that translates into collective action against an oppressing power structure is the need of the hour.

Mind blowing! I came across Prof. Adams in the Early hours of this morning while conducting a literature search. I Googled and TH-camd,, and even made contact with the University of Kansas, Reading some.salient points and watching this webinar have opened countless avenues though which I could channel my proposed research to achieve my aim, which is to find solutions to problems arising with couples within multicultural

Wonderful 🌷

how do you become a member?

Mexico is a safe country these are not Asylum seekers or refugees they are economic migrants .... Nobody has the right to come to the USA for economic reasons no matter what someone told you on the lying MSM cable TV

Content begins at 5:30

"Good science is non-partisan." Pretty hard to argue with that. Which ends up consistent with lots of other evidence out there strongly suggesting that, at least in social psychology, we are pretty clueless as to how much good science is out there. While I am here, I notices that you have published in an encylopedia of "critical psychology." I have not read your articles, and make no claim about their quality or validity. Nonetheless, Marxist-inspired "critical psychology" is not exactly a good poster-child for non-partisan science.

The idea that science, and, especially social science, and, even more especially, social science that addresses politicized topics, proceeds without biases, especially without political biases, has been resoundingly and repeatedly disconfirmed by data. In fact, using Stephen Jay Gould's definition of "fact" in science, it is perverse to believe that advocacy social science on politicized topics proceed without political biases. References available on request.

I disagree. Science is (sometimes) very partisan. Especially SPSSI. See Abramowitz et al, 1975 for SPSSI in particular. See any of these links for articles more generally: www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jussim/papers.html heterodoxacademy.org/resources/publications/ Here is a hypothesis with lots of anecdotal support (albeit no systematic scientific evidence bears on this -- yet): The more defensively scientists deny their own partisanship, the more vulnerable they are to allowing their politics to distort their science. So "science is not partisan" is not a good reason to march for science, because, though it might be true for certain aspects of science (engineering faster computers or identifying the existence of the Higgs Boson are probably not partisan), other aspects, especially in the social sciences, often are (my favorite: social psychologists declaring stereotypes to be inaccurate for nearly 100 years, usually on the basis of no evidence whatsoever). Sadly, our own discipline has its own version of "alternative facts" -- priming elderly stereotypes causes people to walk slowly, power posing has all sorts of wonderful effects, remove stereotype threat and achievement gaps just disappear. No, science, and especially social science, is not the objective, nonpartisan search, and successful for Truth some crack it up to be. I do, however, think marching in the March for Science is, overall, a good idea for two reasons: 1. Science, despite its very real and serious flaws, remains generally better than most other ways of figuring almost anything out. And, even when it is not "generally better" it usually can be conducted in such a way as to add to our understanding of some problem or phenomenon beyond other ways of understanding. 2. Science in particular, and facts in general, are clearly under siege from numerous sources, including but not restricted to the current presidential administration. Standing up for the importance of facts, and for science's role in distinguishing what the facts actually are, seems pretty important -- despite science's imperfections at doing so. . Lee Jussim