Einstein's Laws vs. Newton's Laws 🧐 w/ Neil deGrasse Tyson
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.พ. 2025
- For COPYRIGHT ISSUES, please contact us at: (officialuniverselair@gmail.com) This content is shared for awareness purposes only and does not belong to Universe Lair. If you own the rights and want it removed, email us at (officialuniverselair@gmail.com), and we will immediately delete it. This content is used under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowing for fair use in criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted for non-profit, educational, or personal purposes.
"look here tonight" god i love math
I wish I understood it I would love it too
'God, I love math'
@@cameoncd5456right so where's the contradiction between God and math 💀
Like 1 + 1 = no god? Idk what you mean
Not to lowball Einstein...
Get it ?
I love meth too ❤
Was a fantastic moment back in physics class discovering that Einstein's and Newton's formulas are related when you use low speed and gravity.
I took a “history of mathematics” class for fun and found out that Archimedes’ equations are related to Newtonian Calculus. We all stand on shoulders of giants in one way or another.😊
@@Msapereyes, so said Einstein
To be fair, Einstein's field equations aren't just miraculously related at low speeds, GR was specifically and explicitly designed to equate the christoffel symbols and metric to the newtonian gravitational field and potential at the newtonian limit, that's all the correcting constant is there for and how you derive it in the first place
"when you use low speed" - when you use any ordianry speed, in fact, apart from speeds approaching that of light.
Orbital mechanics are all based on Newtonian maths, and when we send a spacecraft to Mars or Pluto, all the calculations are Newtonian, with no need of the infinitesimal corrections that Einstein would introduce.
@@DownhillAllTheWay yeah for orbital mechanics the relativistic corrections are orders of magnitudes weaker than the perturbations caused by other planets which is itself orders of magnitudes weaker than whatever floating point errors inherent to the hardware doing the calculations, for GPS and navigational systems and such they still only use a very simple relativistic corrections like an additional term or two, the only contexts where a fuller breadth of GR is needed is gravitational lensing (since the newtonian result is off by a factor of two), gravitational waves (which could only emerge out of a relativistic field theory) and cosmology (the FLRW metric and others), none of which are really 'pragmatically needed'
The word ''subsumes'' gives me goosebumps.
Same here bro.
In the future we may get new laws which will subsume the laws of Einstein
You speak for many
Jerma
Isaac Newton came up with all this, THEN HE TURNED 26
On a dare
Bro even invented calculus just to convey his idea's
England
meh that's nothing, bet Newton can't break dance like 36yr old Raygun :D
😮
By low speeds, he means when compared to speed of light.
I was thinking of a Bugatti!
actually it's still not true.
It *approximates* Newton's when the speeds tend towards 0
@@guigolum60,000 mph is 0.01% speed of light and is near enough Newtonian for most practical purposes
@@jonsmith1809 *near*
It is wrong, but close enough.
@@guigolum physics is not math and aproximation in a thing. When you do mesures tools have a level of precision, beyond which digits are heavily mistaken, so you don't have a perfect number.
if there are thing to account that change the measurement with less influence than your level of precision, then you just ignore it because it's not going to give you any information.
Relativity is one of them. Sure, in a theoretical world you would be right. But we don't have the tools to practically even notice that relativity exists at low speeds.
“Hey don’t forget to install the Einstein patch, so the Vulcan bug doesn’t waste your time”
Yeah, but I can Bhop without it, so I'd rather not update reality
Infinitefly will get patched nooooo
Sorry, your planet is scheduled for demolition. Hhgttg
i really hate this new update, thanks to the new speed limit i can no longer travel through time.
Bro dropped physics 2.0💀
Newton was the beginning of our understanding of Physics.
Man... at the end of this video what he just said gave me a shiver along my spine, literally!
Seeing Einstein smiling while he puts eyeglasses on made me smile too. So many emotions in just a minute time...
It was a nice edit indeed
Genius is Genius no matter the time
Delusion. 90%+ of what they say isnt true.
This is SO important for people to hear! It is a nonsense when people doubt science because they have been led to believe that it's always being replaced - it's only ever being REFINED!
Its important to remember that all scientific tests must be "failable." And we only speak in terms of how certain we are that something won't "fail" a test (like something falling when dropped.) It is our best understanding, given what we've tested. Everyone is welcome and encouraged to go out and test things themselves if they don't want to trust the experts.
your statement doenst fit to the vid. Einstein gets proven wrong, every year.
The only modern physicist which acutally got proven right are, Stephen Hawking, he assumed that black holes loose matter, which got proven, after his death.
Friedman Freund.
de Grasse is completly gas lighting, he knows that Einsteins is low bob, bascially every enhnecement of newtons laws got proven wrong. einstein bascially had no unique correct ideas.
wait there are people like that??
Science being wrong is a feature not a bug.
No, no, no, there were moments it had been replaced. Some ideas, that made sense at one point in the past, got entirely deleted.
Imagine if he was alive today, with the ability to harness all the technology available. I honestly believe he’d invent multiple new modalities beyond comprehension.
Neil is still alive
@@magnov983He's talking about Newton
He would probably need decades to comprehend the dramatic advances in science and Technologies 🥸
I think that’s a kind of limited view on why people come up with the ideas that they do, when and where. It’s not just that ‘genius’ is plucked into anywhere and gives rise to things, but that people emerge from specific moments in time, specific historical junctures with the sets of experience knowledge and influence to hit those moments
It's more about the knowledge available then technology.
Those who are contagiously exuberant about learning are rare and beautiful
"look here tonight" (got goosebumps)
Bro dropped the bug fixes/patch notes for physics
Amazing short. Id have expected a little pause after last statement
This is the difference between mythology and science. Mythology is stuck and can never change. It could only be proven wrong as time goes on. Which is why there are so many denominations of even one religion. However science can only improve upon itself and eventually end up with the correct answer far enough down the road. Mythology is in a cone that is getting narrower and narrower every day while science is the opposite - narrowing down what it doesn't know until there isn't anything left to know.
At SOME point in the future we will know everything, & that knowledge will have us evolve beyond mythology. I know that already so therefore I can already evolve beyond it today.
Given an infinite number of possible outcomes, with more & more being eliminated every day. Every new discovery leads to new opportunities that we never knew from our future but also cancels out questions we thought we had answered from our past.
Depending on how you define "knowing everything", we might never actually know everything, since there might just be an infinite amount of things to be known, so there'd always be something more to find out. At least in theoretical mathematics, this is definitely the case, as proven by Gödel's incompleteness theorems.
My favorite part about Isaac Newton is how human he was. Yes an absolute genius but also he believed in magic and hated a coworker so much that he became president of the university he worked at just so he could delete him from the record so apparently he was also a genius on holding on to hate. I bet he'd be real fun with the internet.
He is so amazing to listing him 24/7 not being tired just doing wow 😮
Quantum Gravity, if it exists and TOE is next.
TOE is kinda by definition the last thing to be discovered/conceived of no?
@AbdelrahmanGumaa theory of everything (definetely not the geometry dash level lol)
TOW may exist but human will never figure it out
@@SirTatManTat In the reductionist view, a TOE would be the last thing, and end reductionist science. But chemistry, biology, materials science, solid state physics etc. have long departed from the purely reductionist view.
A theory of everything is not the "Principle of Universal Discovery" as conceived by Möbius in Dürrenmatt's "The Physicists"; nor is it the answer to the "Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything" out of Adams "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"
You must know a lot because you use acronyms.
Seriously i can't believe that i am breathing the same air as Sir Newton, Sir Einstein etc
Is highly possible you have at least one molecule in your body that once have been in theirs.
@@matthewlevine2159yeah, methane! 💨
Einstein wasn’t a Sir.
Sir denotes a knighthood, which is a British thing
@@adam_p99 And it can also be a polite/respectful way of addressing someone
@@T4TheTidePod but in this context it can be somewhat of an insult to Sir Newton. Just like you address people with doctoral degrees with "doctor smith" and not "Mr smith", you also shouldn't be using Sir in this context, by all means pay your respect to certain people by calling them Sir, but when you list people as Sir Newton and Sir Einstein, all of a sudden your killing the nighthood tradition. the use of Sir has been changed a lot thought time, I know it really isn't that deep, but if I was Knighted, I know exactly how I'd feel if the prefix Sir was thrown about at anyone.
Every single science theory is an evolution of what came prior. It's just like art, every piece of art is something old that was taken and transformed while being evolved.
But newton's theory was a massive leap
THIS IS SO COOL!!!
This fires me up. I want more
I did not understand a thing he said, but he seems like he is enjoying his job! That’s amazing !
He's giving a modern breakdown of everything moves and exist from Dark Energy and Dark Matter. The birth and NATURE of black holes is the key. I met him years ago. He's down to earth and very approachable. We briefly discussed Zero Point Energy. He was surprised we could hold a in depth conversation about it. Indeed , he does love his work.
@@gabeeskridge8291 i was just joking I know, and I know this guy is awesome, it’s amazing to see that some humans can be so interesting !
Neil you are one helluva storyteller. Nobody explains science as well as you.
Or lies as much (as far as scientists)
@@jeromilittle when did Neil lie?
@@egbun off the top of my head: when he claimed the earth is proportionally smoother than a cue ball, and when he repeated the myth that an ice skate creates a thin layer of water under it due to the pressure.
@@egbun …but there are MANY SUCH INSTANCES
@@jeromilittle "Many" doesn’t count, and the two specifics you listed are minor mistakes not intentional lies.
If Einstein were alive today with all the technologies we have
.
.
We could have reached new hights,we could have time travelled who knows
It’s like how the law of cosines became Pythagoras’s theorem when theata is a right angle.
_"Subsume"_ is now a part of my personal lexicon... 🤷🏿♂️
subsume
/səbˈsjuːm/
verb
gerund or present participle: subsuming
include or absorb (something) in something else.
"most of these phenomena can be subsumed under two broad categories"
Absorbs
that and lexicon now....
Incredible educator ❤
Its still amazing how a massive magnifying glass can see something lightyears away
So can you. You can see stars.
or even years cuz light, as fast as it is still has a limit, so if u see smth rlly far away then you could be seeing what it was like a couple of years ago
Telescopes generally aren't about magnification, so much as gathering light. If you want to see planets then high magnification is required, but most objects in the night sky are large enough that they don't need magnification. Andromeda Galaxy is three times bigger than the full moon, but the light is so dim that the human eye can barely make it out, whereas a telescope uses a large aperture to gather and then concentrate the dim light directly into your eye, making the object visible.
I love this man he’s so smart but doesn’t get cocky about it he explains things in such a way that everyone not only understands but their interest is sparked in whatever he’s talking about
Can't wait for Science 2 to release! Science: Einstein edition
I laughed when he said “Theory of Motion” I’m cooked😂😂😂
Wish he was my professor.
Say that again 😢🎉❤
NGT is a magnificent teacher. 👍
ChatGPT gave me a really good analogy to help understand this. Newton’s equation is like a map of Colorado. And Einstein’s equation is like a map of the whole US. If you zoom into a section of the US map, it BECOMES a map of Colorado
I feel like if you needed chatgpt to come up with this analogy, or even to understand what was being said in this short, then idk what to tell you. This is like 80iq behavior. I really hope you’re like 11 because if you’re any older you’re simply not going to make it
Not exactly
@@SaveThatMoney411 of course it's "not exact", it's an analogy. Some of the specificity gets lost in the comparison.
If you needed chatgpt to make this analogy or even to understand what was being said then idk, youre not going to make it
@@SuperCaptainFailwell Mr Pedantic perhaps you should set the example and get your "you're" correct. 😊
Only for now until we prove otherwise I believe it's missing something to make it complete 🤔.
Nabisco’s law of Fig Newtons.
:
The strawberry ones are 🔥🔥🔥
LMAO, bruh
It’s super interesting how then both Mercury and Neptune had issues with their orbiting: so the same logic to Uranus was applied “there must be another planet affecting it (Vulcan for Mercury and X for Neptune)”
The very notion of Einsteinian equations SUBSUMING Newton’s just changed my viewpoint of the universe in a single word. And I have a degree in physics. NGT is the man.
Yeah, it reframes everything for me. Before the context was "at the level of", or "falls apart at..." Cane we same the same for Quantum physics yet?
Yet there are many who do not respect him in the least. They say is not a "real" physicist like Brian Greene. Why would they say that about him and put him down?
@@calvinjackson8110Mostly because Newton, aside from his huge! findings in the laws of gravity, also dabbled in alchemy and trying to make gold from other materials, and also was highly religious to the point he made calculations for when the apocalypse would happen based on the Book of Revelations (they didn't come true of course). For some scientists that is enough reason to dispute him being an actual physicist like we know today and see him more like a quack with a single brilliant idea, though they do respect said idea a lot.
At least, that's what I remember from when I learned about Newton. I might be mistaken, feel free to correct me if it's needed.
Well said! But get this, Newton himself has one of the most iconic quotes of all time.(I am paraphrasing). “ if I have seen further than others it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants before me “ i’m not sure if this is exact but you get the idea so to say that Einstein stood on the shoulders of the works that Newton had done would be appropriate.
Any new scientific theory must explain all the evidence that supported the previous theory.
The list of Newton's discoveries are mind boggling !!
Love hearing Neil talk. This short gave me goosebumps 👍
He doesn't use my preferred pronunciation of Uranus.
It is said that the Muslim scholar Al-Biruni addressed the concept of gravity before Isaac Newton. Al-Biruni, who lived in the 10th and 11th centuries, mentioned the idea of a force pulling objects toward the center of the Earth. While he did not develop the concept of gravity in the same way Newton did, his writings are considered early insights into the idea of gravitational forces.
Additionally, Ibn al-Haytham, another Muslim scholar, made contributions to physics and optics, providing ideas about the movement of objects, which can also be seen as early steps toward understanding gravity. However, the formalization of the law of gravity is attributed to Isaac Newton.
Yep, late medieval Muslim scholars provided foundational developments which early renaissance europe really continued with
@@PasteurizedLettuceRenaissance Europe learned things from the ancient Greece and ancient Rome, ancient southern European knowledge in general. We are all STILL using the Roman names for the first 5 discovered planets. Mercury, Mars, Venus, Saturn, Jupiter are all names that were used by the ancient Romans themselves 2000+ years ago!
@@Just_another_Euro_dude you’re missing the massive step in between of hundreds of years of Muslim scholars who were the primary caretakers and continuers of Greco Roman philosophy lol that’s why a lot of those books didn’t fade to dust as European interest in Greek philosophy waned in the early medieval period
@@Just_another_Euro_dude and also that’s not how any of that works, there are literally hundreds of years of development also outside the islamicate world but within China India and Europe itself that form the foundation of these scientific and philosophical discoveries, anyone who actually knows the history of mathematics, philosophy, medicine, r even just ‘gunpowder, the printing press,’ understands that it was an interconnected world that created the foundation of these developments. I am educated in the history of science, and I have to say the poorly framed idea that ancient thought was just ‘hibernating’ as if Eurasia and North Africa just twiddled their thumbs for a thousand years is one of the most common misconceptions. Europe was not static in its developments and certainly was not alone.
@@PasteurizedLettuce Nah. Islamic Golden age was translating European texts and taking Hindu innovations. This all is very well known. Ibn Sina being one of the most notorious
Al-Biruni also said that Islam was blocking him either way Al-Biruni is not even close in comparison of Newton, you are ignorantly glazing the figures of the Islamic age. Ibn al-Haytham also had problems with Islamic faith coming inbetween him and knowledge. Many scientists were executed for blasphemy
Thanks 👍
Not only that but we don’t know how many genders there are
That's because that one is a social construct and is this malleable
Two. Male and Female.
So what's that got to do with Newton? Wrong video comment perhaps
@@iRosscoI meant to reply to someone’s comment where I took it as we are actually getting dumber and I used my reply as a way to agree and as an example as how we are in some way lowering the bar! Hope that helps.
It’s a spectrum… is that simple enough for you
I speak with the same intensity when ordering pizza
Isaac newton loves Jesus
Who asked
@@gallium69420 what do you mean?
Neil is an atheist.
Newton may not have know God; but, God knew and loved Newton.
I just want some simple education not a religious one lmao. That's just spamming your nonsense in unwanted places. (Whoopsy on my spelling mistake lol)
I had this topic on my TOEFL practise test)
If we never fail, we never learn what makes us weaker.
Digging the tie❤
"If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. "
-Sir Isaac Newton
awesome topics
Because at low speeds, F=ma works but it Doesn't work when approaching lightspeed.
That is a severe limitation.
Not that long ago I read a popular science book by Italian physicist Carlo Rovelli about his specialty which is loop quantum gravity. Unfortunately I don't remember the title. He is interested in the history of science and gave an example that gave me think about our understanding of how the Universe works. He described how the thinkers during times of Ancient Greece tried to explain the motion of the planets in the geocentric model. It required a complex set of circles within circles within circles but it kind of worked. They were able to predict the positions of the planets and the solar eclipses using it. Then came Copernicus and his model explained the planets' motion in a much simpler and precise way by using the existing idea of a heliocentric model. But he could not let go of the religious idea of the heavenly bodies which had to be perfect and therefore moved in perfectly circular orbits. Then came Kepler and, with the idea of elliptical orbits, got very close but the timing of the Mercury orbit was off by 43 arcseconds per century. Finally incorporating Einstein's theory of relativity made the numbers line up with observations perfectly.
What we are seeing right now with the observations using the JWST is perhaps similar. Our model of the Universe and underlying physics are correct but we are missing some pieces that need tweaking. Just like in case of General Theory of Relativity needed to fix the tiny calculation discrepancy in Mercury's orbit, maybe it could be a discovery of something groundbreaking that will make our predictions match our observations made using the new telescope. And maybe those small discrepancies will lead us to those discoveries.
Sir, your brilliance as an educator like Dr Green & Noble laureate Feynman etc Clarity with analogical simplicity on 'Motion/ Speed & Gravity ' The concept finally Wrapped & tamed in Mathematical Equations.
Similar to Faraday and Maxwell on Electromagnetism. Takeoff & Landing of a plane/shuttle, vehicle is same only role & scope varies according to speed & Gravity.
Sir, your brilliance as an educator like Dr Green & Noble laureate Feynman etc Clarity with analogical simplicity on 'Motion/ Speed & Gravity ' The concept finally Wrapped & tamed in Mathematical Equations.
Similar to Faraday and Maxwell on Electromagnetism. Takeoff & Landing of a plane/shuttle, vehicle is same only role & scope varies according to speed & Gravity.
The main thing that I learned in college about science is that we know what we know until we know more and then we update what we think we know. I always wonder what we think we know now that will be updated in the future.
They figured out how universe works while people like us still can't figure out how humans work 😅
And YET, people will say the earth is flat lol
Both are right. But one is better at much much larger scales.
I really do wish I had appreciated this man when I was in school 😭 now I'm 40 and can barely remember if my socks match ....they don't...
Its amazing that we can predict planet that we didn't know
And to think that Newton lived at the same time as Leibniz. And that Aristotle was the student of Plato. I think the way we have configured our society simply doesn't allow for the same level of individual geniuses (which means we can do a lot of scientific progress but only within the existing framework it takes more now to have a revolution in the Kuhnian sense). The latest living genius that comes to mind is Putnam. Anyone else have some contenders? Hawking?
Thank You, Neil
context - anchor asked what's your phone's NEW ringTONe ?
Right On Neil! 👍🏾
Add frequency vibration. Then spin it
I often think Neil deGrasse Tyson is "just" a performer. But then he does great stuff like this.
He gets so excited 😂😂
Measured with a gravity meter, just add more planets to form the desired equation.
Can only be beat by rain clouds, magnets and crisp packets landing in bushes after a gust of wind
I wish we had a day in which we celebrate Newton's laws.
Two absolute geniuses
Science is the way forward!
It’s crazy that these people were so smart to even think to do these things like his equations were so spot on that it discovered a whole other planet that’s crazy
Very interesting
Einstein and Newton , everytime I hear these names, I get inspired.
Just because of these two persons mentioned Physics became a feared subject 😅
neil really loves newton
Neil your the best ❤
The scientific discoveries or theory formulation way back before modern times amaze me because they came up with the theory or discovery without the technology we have today
The way i see it, relativity is kind of like parallax error, but for where you are measuring from in space time instead of what angle you are measuring at. So for example, Newtons laws would still apply if measured from on the black holes or from on planets far away, but if measuring from here on Earth, we need the correction of relativity.
It's all relative 😊
Pepper’s suit was probably being automatically operated by the onboard AI, and she was only brought there because Strange knew it would be Tony’s last chance to see her
Some people seen through the matrix 400 years ago. And here I am, struggling to finish a not-so-complicated computer game ...
Absolutely Correct!
Just imagine the excitement of those people who realized there is a New planet Neptune
What a communicator.
Thanks, I try.
I like when scientist explain about science
Word of the day :"Subsume"
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if all those scientists have today's technology
Remember one of the greatest mind can miss something until someone like albert einstein come.
No! It's not just an update. It's a totally different perspective of spacetime, not motion law.
"look here tonight" definitely Isaac's words. just in another's breath
So awesome. We get updates by humans on what’s around us.
I thought this was about Mercury’s orbit not fitting with Newton’s equations and not Neptune? That’s how Eddington got Einstein involved to prove or disprove this.
That's the opposite. They thought a planet was there when it wasn't. There is a shorts of Neil explaining that also. The data was wrong
That’s why I say Isaac Newton is the greatest mind to ever exist because of the time he lived in he created equations that test the theory of the universe itself if it wasn’t for him there wouldn’t even be equations to update study or understand so his thinking relative to his time is so far advanced there hasn’t been another human who has thought that far and advanced ahead relative to their time if someone invents time travel it’ll be based off of his equations but the mere fact of inventing it would put that person in the conversation but it’ll Newton Einstein and whomever at 1a 1b 1c respectively although b and c might be interchangeable
"look here tonight" nobody bothered to look there including the person who said it except one guy 😂
My only question is how do you put low speed and low gravity into an equation ?
Lucky are those who had Einstein as their lecturer
Newton said Pi is 3.14159265358979323846. Einstein didn't redefine Pi, he just said it's 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971. Maybe one day somebody comes along and gives even more digits for our Pi analogy.
There is a book called 1 million digits of pie
When you talk about space you're talking about me
When Newton found the limits to math he said "Well I guess I'll just fucking INVENT Calculus"