Remember "Spirit"? In that movie, Spirit couldn't talk with other horses or the humans, but he narrated the story and explained his thoughts to the audience. They probably should have done that in Walking with Dinosaurs.
There's a version of this movie called the Cretaceous Cut, and they stripped all the dialogue and bad jokes out in favor of narration provided by Benedict Cumberbatch. They also trimmed a lot of scenes, so the Cretaceous Cut is only about 40 or so minutes long instead of over an hour long.
We could’ve easily gotten a beautiful feature length episode of one of the greatest documentary shows ever made… but nope, Fox just *_HAD_* to turn it into Ice Age 3.5!
"I am not children." -Dino Guy 2024 Truly a quotation, must be said as many think dinosaurs or prehistoric animals can only be enjoyable by children. Despite the amount of science and knowledge it takes to understand them at any capacity.
I believe they actually are not just in Alaska. The beginning of the film is set further south in Canada, but as the film progresses, it goes to Alaska. That would explain the inclusion of Quetzalcoatlus, as fossils known from the area were recently re-described as a unique genus, Cryodrakon.
We’ll probably never get something like Rite of Spring from Fantasia in a mainstream movie again which is a real shame because silent storytelling that only uses music and visuals is amazing.
The way I dream of a dinosaur film where they’re designed like they were in that film as opposed to screen accuracy. Just to satisfy the part of my childhood where I believed real dinosaurs looked like that haha
The film should’ve been geared towards the older fans but with moments to help attract the attention of children, but without making it a knockoff of Disney’s Dinosaurs.
6:13 Yes this movie is very accurate. Also, I'm starting to think the dinosaurs and the creatures from the movie (Walking with Dinosaurs 3D) and from these documentaries (Prehistoric Planet 1&2 and Life on Our Planet) looked very realistic and very accurate as I can see. And the movie "Walking with Dinosaurs 3D" it's not bad? But I don't hate it after all. Also I don't like the mean ones who hated this movie :(
Regardless of how Fox legit ruin the movie, I still do love this movie regardless because of how breathaking it is and just its overall look And I hope you continue to make these reviews cause they're awesome. 😊
This is one of my childhood fav movies ever! Ever since I was a little kid, I would act like the dinosaurs onscreen and I don’t mind the talking voices at all even though I am a dinosaur fan
What I always find funny about WWD the Movie is that back in the 90's Disney's Dinosaur was originally going to not have lip movement when the dinos talked, because the animators couldn't figure out how to do lip sync for dinosaurs. Eisner HATED that idea and said it was "a failure on the animators' part" . Fast forward to WWD the Movie, and not only did they give it some of the dumbest dialog you will ever hear, but they didn't even bother doing any lip sync so you have what's basically Dinosaur Homeward Bound
Great video! Didn’t release they did a documentary version of it. I need to seek that out…. Well if you ever feel in the mood to have a laugh and tear something apart I recommend “Dinosaur with Stephen Fry” You only need to watch it once if you make it through it all 😂
@@seanboisupreme The shortened theatrical documentary version with Benedict Cumberbatch narration is called "Walking with dinosaurs Prehistoric planet 3d". The "Cretaceous Cut" is the uncut full-length film with voiceover track removed (the silly visual gags & Karl Urban scenes are still there).
I think the fact that everybody wanted a movie from the series is taking away how good this movie actually is. Plus the overall message of every fossil telling it’s own story is amazing.
3:15 well yeah, but some tracks like River Attack is great for the Gorgosaurus, without dialogue, the Gorgosaurus stampede with that music on the background is so great
7:06 Actually, the movie animation strated working in 2011 and the pachyrhinosaurus perotorum article is from 2011, too. So I don't think the artist know what pachyrhinosaurus perotorum look like when they made their designs.
@@mikechirinos9817 I mean Walking With Dinosaurs 2013. This movie strated working in 2011, but movie need 1~2 years to prepare the story and characters design. so it actually started production in 2010 and P. perotorum article is from 2011. It's why I guess they don't know P. perotorum look like when they finished characters design.
With you talking about how good the last few Jurassic World Evolution 2 DLCs have been, I wonder what kind of of DLCs would you most like to see in the future? A Permian or Triassic species pack? Or a Cretaceous Herbivore pack after we just got the Cretaceous Predator pack?
The Cretaceous Cut, a version of the film without dino dialogue included in the DVD, and Benedict Cumberbatch's documentary voiceover for museum shows (posted here on youtube by the user Jokey Account) are the superior edits. I have a soft spot for this film (especially those alternate versions) since it cemented pachyrhinosaurus as one of my favorite ceratopsians
I've probably said this before but if you ever do a review of The Good Dinosaur please include Josh Cotton's redesign of Arlo as an Alamosaurus because that shows how the film could have looked a lot better even with the detailed background.
Despite having a quite cliche story, having it silent would have given it a new perspective of story telling that doesn’t need any dialogue or language to be understood. But instead, the executives made the most horrible decision a executive could make. something that could have been a almost masterpiece that would have given a different perspective of story telling, now just a Annoyingly cliche kids movie
At least azhdarchid remains have been found in Canada and Alaska, but they are not enough to tell whether the genus is Quetzalcoatlus or something else.
Some out there would argue that Disney’s _”Dinosaur”_ could’ve benefited from _not_ having its characters talk at all. _However…_ I would argue that in the case of that film alone, for what the directors ultimately wanted to go with, the dialogue was a _benefit_ to it… *NOT* in the case of “Walking with Dinosaurs (🦖)” here, where all the dialogue/voice acting feels like a studio-mandated afterthought. I _will_ agree that the CGI animation, designs, and environments are top-tier (👍).
Its a decent watch for kids, but making them talking was unnecessary and does kinda bring it down in my opinion. The John Leguezamo bird got extremely annoying
I thought it was good but the talking and the hole dumb opening with the humans that weren’t needed and I thought it they had three different stories of dinosaurs and they could have this story as the final story it could have been better and some song in this were not great but I thought the last song for the credits was Catchy but overall if they make another walking with dinosaurs movie after the reboot series if it’s good they could actually use the potential for it
I absolutely loved this movie as a kid and I still do. It's not great by any objective metric. The dialogue and story could have been great had the writing not been a secondary objective and they definitely should have given more indication that they actually were talking rather than being telepathic. But overall this movie just exudes that childlike wonder and amazement for dinosaurs that I just can't get enough of. And the music was great fight me.
13:46 "Those additions where made primarily for children in mind- and I am not a children..." I like those really small jokes you throw in, like this goofy grammar,
While the Documentary is the superior version, I wish they kept some of the smaller scenes like the 3 Quetzies in the rain, which is then paralleled with the same trio at spring, which is then followed up by a family of Alphadon emerging aswell. That and the scene where Patchi passes by serval creatures on his way back the herd being cut down. Though I am prolly just nitpicking. Really wish the Createous Cut weren’t just a DVD exclusive. Also, I disagree with the choice of renaming the Gorgo to Nanuq, I’d rather misinform location rather than design, if I had to pick one.
I went and saw it in theatres with my wife. I... Did not know just how bad the talking was gonna be... If I even knew there was gonna be talking. But it was a miserable experience. Yeah the creature design and CGI was beautiful... But they also have a scene where the kid gets pooped on. Like... We almost left. Maybe I'll try and find the documentary version some time. I would LOVE to think about pachyrhinosaurus without thinking of that disaster of a movie.
I disagree. It's not that bad at all for many reasons for what it is: 1. It introduces different species of dinosaurs instead of featuring the same old ones that we all know, like the overrated t-Rex for example. 2. It's the only dinosaur movie that is more realistic in terms of the factual information for educational purposes, yet it depicts itself as a hybrid of mainstream entertainment and education which makes this movie unique. 3. It's silly humor is firmly tongue-in-cheek, and while not every comedic line hits the mark, most of it's humor is funny. 4. The voice acting dubs over the animals so the audience can understand how dinosaurs as well as other creatures/animals communicate with each other. It's been 10 years since this underrated gem came out (I saw it in theaters when I was 14 years old), and I actually still love this movie. 3.5/4 stars.
This is word for word my opinion also, I was pretty hype to watch it back when it came out but the cheesy voice over was just. Too distracting, really took it outta me. I didn't know they released a documentary version though, I need to go hunt that down!
Honestly, if you don’t focus on the dialogue then you can see this as a great movie. This movie is not bad in the slightest and all of this hate should have been towards the movie Dino Time.
I felt bad for you because since your favorite dinosaur was a pachyrhinosaurus since Jurassic Fight Club was depicted horribly, Disney's Dinosaur when the pachyrhinosaurus get taken down by a carnotaurus and now we have THIS movies.
My gripe with this movie was the fact that it only focused on one time piriod. When I hear the title "Walking with Dinosaurs", I obviously think of the show, so I expected that they would show dinos from all of the mesozoic era. I have a similar gripe with Prehistoric Planet. Don't get me wrong, I love the show, but prehistory covers more than just the era of the dinosaurs. A more accurate name for the show would be "Cretaceous Planet" as that is the time period that the show focuses on. By the way, you inspired me to download Prehistoric Kingdom! Lastly, you should give the documovie "March of the Dinosaurs" a try. I really enjoyed it when I was younger.
The biggest sin of this movie outside of being barely watchable is having « Walking with dinosaurs » in its title. That I can’t forgive because even if you remove the whole dialog thing and other trash, it’s still a documentary who didn’t understood the source material. It’s not a WWD movie, it’s a shameless Disney’s Dinosaur ripoff. This one is by the way a 2000’ masterpiece. Not this 2013’ trash.
I watched only once this *thing* and right after just five minutes I dropped it because man, this movie hurts both physically and mentally... If somebody ask me what is the best definition of pain, I'll tell them to watch this crap of a movie
The reasons I hate this movie? 1. Location: it set in Alaska during a Cretaceous ice age so it would much colder 2. The animation and design: the design look to unspecialize for polar habitats and the animation is so terrible (specially on their mouths) that the lion king 2019(which interesting the same maker work on prehistoric planet) more realistic 3.the humans: the humans are so bland and forgettable their should be not in the movie and I was wasted when I see them at the beginning So in short: if you meet someone who say the series is great 😊 But if you meet someone who say the movie is great😢
Unpopular opinion: People give this movie more hate than it deserves - and it deserves very little hate in my opinion. Looks good enough, has a basic story that is nor amazing nor awful - pretty regular family movie.
1:10 I think you shouldn't take the movie more serious than what it's trying to be, the movie works for what it is and the dialogue is part of it. This movie is not from my time so I don't have any nostalgia towards it, and still I rewatched it last year and It's pretty good, If someday I have kids I definitely see myself showing them this movie. Also, you said you love Disney's Dinosaur and actually for my that's the movie I found annoying as a kid. I've not watched it in many years, but I'm surprised you don't like the dialogue of this movie. Also, I'd rather have the dinosaurs talking without moving their lips as a human, because that would have felt too artificial for me.
It’s a terrible Walking With Dinosaurs movie but it’s not a bad dinosaur movie….. it’s one of the better dinosaur movies, it’s not excellent but it was not terrible either it was just a mediocre, a bad walking with dinosaurs movie and a mediocre dinosaur movie I mean there are plenty of dinosaurs movies that are even worse than Walking with dinosaurs 2013, I mean look at “I am T.Rex” from 2023 that film is a lot worse than Walking with dinosaur 2013 in my opinion
The voice acting on the characters are just awful, That's what ruins this movie, The dinosaurs weren't even talking at all, Just some dumb voice overs like how people dubbed animals on those TH-cam videos, Dinosaur designs are great but the film would been better without the childish dialogue
I think RickRaptor105 described it best as "Talking with Dinosaurs"
Yeah he did
Walking with Dinosaurs: the Bad Lip Reading
It's the most obvious pun in the world
@@RickRaptor105speak of the devil, here he is!
So did that one comment on Animat’s review.
Remember "Spirit"? In that movie, Spirit couldn't talk with other horses or the humans, but he narrated the story and explained his thoughts to the audience. They probably should have done that in Walking with Dinosaurs.
Would have been a much better alternative
A bit like dinoking..you know the tarbo in this i believe they tried something close as Spirit
Blast from the past, I remember this film
The second trailer made me believe that would be the case.
And then the talking trailer came on.
That's what I thought
There's a version of this movie called the Cretaceous Cut, and they stripped all the dialogue and bad jokes out in favor of narration provided by Benedict Cumberbatch. They also trimmed a lot of scenes, so the Cretaceous Cut is only about 40 or so minutes long instead of over an hour long.
Is this true?
And if it is, can it be found on YT or streaming?
@@shadowmarauder6033 I gotchu. th-cam.com/video/1mGh7YYuLns/w-d-xo.htmlsi=dxovInw3hjucaN2V
I did indeed talk about that
@@shadowmarauder6033yeah it’s on TH-cam I think, and it’s quite good.
@@shadowmarauder6033It's true. It's called Walking with Dinosaurs: Prehistoric Planet, and you can find it on TH-cam.
We could’ve easily gotten a beautiful feature length episode of one of the greatest documentary shows ever made… but nope, Fox just *_HAD_* to turn it into Ice Age 3.5!
Noot really as there no ice age mammals in it
@@pierre-samuelroux9364
I meant tone wise, it’s got the tone and kiddy humour of a later Ice Age movie.
@@awesomeproductions7755 yea
The first 3 ice age movies are great, the 4th, 5th and what ever adventures of buck wild is where rubbish.
Ok, enlighten me. Give me a reason why this movie is bad other than the talking
"I am not children." -Dino Guy 2024
Truly a quotation, must be said as many think dinosaurs or prehistoric animals can only be enjoyable by children. Despite the amount of science and knowledge it takes to understand them at any capacity.
This was the movie I watched on repeat as a kid. Really brings back alot of memories.
I believe they actually are not just in Alaska. The beginning of the film is set further south in Canada, but as the film progresses, it goes to Alaska. That would explain the inclusion of Quetzalcoatlus, as fossils known from the area were recently re-described as a unique genus, Cryodrakon.
We’ll probably never get something like Rite of Spring from Fantasia in a mainstream movie again which is a real shame because silent storytelling that only uses music and visuals is amazing.
The way I dream of a dinosaur film where they’re designed like they were in that film as opposed to screen accuracy. Just to satisfy the part of my childhood where I believed real dinosaurs looked like that haha
@@garzapinups that would be fun, retro dinosaurs do look really cool.
At least we have Genndy Tartakovsky's Primal.
Luckily we got Primal
Don’t loose hope, we must somehow get a dinosaur film like Fantasia where there is NO talking dinosaurs
The film should’ve been geared towards the older fans but with moments to help attract the attention of children, but without making it a knockoff of Disney’s Dinosaurs.
Are you kidding, IT WAS LIKE LITERALLY ONE OF THE BEST DINOSAUR MOVIES OF MY LIFE!!!!
Words cannot describe how much I agree with you
6:13 Yes this movie is very accurate. Also, I'm starting to think the dinosaurs and the creatures from the movie (Walking with Dinosaurs 3D) and from these documentaries (Prehistoric Planet 1&2 and Life on Our Planet) looked very realistic and very accurate as I can see. And the movie "Walking with Dinosaurs 3D" it's not bad? But I don't hate it after all.
Also I don't like the mean ones who hated this movie :(
Regardless of how Fox legit ruin the movie, I still do love this movie regardless because of how breathaking it is and just its overall look
And I hope you continue to make these reviews cause they're awesome. 😊
This is one of my childhood fav movies ever! Ever since I was a little kid, I would act like the dinosaurs onscreen and I don’t mind the talking voices at all even though I am a dinosaur fan
Lol I did the same
I loved this movie as a kid, the nostalgia is killing me
We appreciate all your videos bro, keep going 💯💯❤️
What I always find funny about WWD the Movie is that back in the 90's Disney's Dinosaur was originally going to not have lip movement when the dinos talked, because the animators couldn't figure out how to do lip sync for dinosaurs.
Eisner HATED that idea and said it was "a failure on the animators' part" . Fast forward to WWD the Movie, and not only did they give it some of the dumbest dialog you will ever hear, but they didn't even bother doing any lip sync so you have what's basically Dinosaur Homeward Bound
I like that they kept the dialog
Great video! Didn’t release they did a documentary version of it.
I need to seek that out….
Well if you ever feel in the mood to have a laugh and tear something apart I recommend “Dinosaur with Stephen Fry”
You only need to watch it once if you make it through it all 😂
It’s called the Cretaceous Cut! It’s here on TH-cam somewhere.
@@seanboisupreme Thankyou! 😃
@@seanboisupreme The shortened theatrical documentary version with Benedict Cumberbatch narration is called "Walking with dinosaurs Prehistoric planet 3d". The "Cretaceous Cut" is the uncut full-length film with voiceover track removed (the silly visual gags & Karl Urban scenes are still there).
Where can I find the documentary version??? I can't find it anywhere!!!
th-cam.com/video/PwDprDPFCkM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ErxCUsDJ4k9PnUz6
Where could I find the documentary version?
It should be somewhere on TH-cam
It's called Walking with Dinosaurs: Prehistoric Planet 3D (2014)
For your next many designs of video, could you do velociraptor/raptors?
I voted for Edmontosaurus!
I think the fact that everybody wanted a movie from the series is taking away how good this movie actually is.
Plus the overall message of every fossil telling it’s own story is amazing.
3:15 well yeah, but some tracks like River Attack is great for the Gorgosaurus, without dialogue, the Gorgosaurus stampede with that music on the background is so great
You can change the settings on the DVD release and make have no dialog
7:06 Actually, the movie animation strated working in 2011 and the pachyrhinosaurus perotorum article is from 2011, too. So I don't think the artist know what pachyrhinosaurus perotorum look like when they made their designs.
You mean March of the Dinosaurs? Because it was released in 2011
@@mikechirinos9817 I mean Walking With Dinosaurs 2013. This movie strated working in 2011, but movie need 1~2 years to prepare the story and characters design. so it actually started production in 2010 and P. perotorum article is from 2011. It's why I guess they don't know P. perotorum look like when they finished characters design.
With you talking about how good the last few Jurassic World Evolution 2 DLCs have been, I wonder what kind of of DLCs would you most like to see in the future? A Permian or Triassic species pack? Or a Cretaceous Herbivore pack after we just got the Cretaceous Predator pack?
12:46 lucky for me, I ignore the voices all the time
The worst thing about this movie is how much potential it squandered
Give this movie a break, I enjoyed it so much
The Cretaceous Cut, a version of the film without dino dialogue included in the DVD, and Benedict Cumberbatch's documentary voiceover for museum shows (posted here on youtube by the user Jokey Account) are the superior edits. I have a soft spot for this film (especially those alternate versions) since it cemented pachyrhinosaurus as one of my favorite ceratopsians
I've probably said this before but if you ever do a review of The Good Dinosaur please include Josh Cotton's redesign of Arlo as an Alamosaurus because that shows how the film could have looked a lot better even with the detailed background.
I’ll keep that in mind!
@@DinoGuy8 thanks.
Despite having a quite cliche story, having it silent would have given it a new perspective of story telling that doesn’t need any dialogue or language to be understood.
But instead, the executives made the most horrible decision a executive could make.
something that could have been a almost masterpiece that would have given a different perspective of story telling, now just a Annoyingly cliche kids movie
In Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron and Walking with Dinosaurs 3D: The Movie we don't see them talking
At least azhdarchid remains have been found in Canada and Alaska, but they are not enough to tell whether the genus is Quetzalcoatlus or something else.
Some out there would argue that Disney’s _”Dinosaur”_ could’ve benefited from _not_ having its characters talk at all. _However…_ I would argue that in the case of that film alone, for what the directors ultimately wanted to go with, the dialogue was a _benefit_ to it… *NOT* in the case of “Walking with Dinosaurs (🦖)” here, where all the dialogue/voice acting feels like a studio-mandated afterthought.
I _will_ agree that the CGI animation, designs, and environments are top-tier (👍).
Its a decent watch for kids, but making them talking was unnecessary and does kinda bring it down in my opinion. The John Leguezamo bird got extremely annoying
I want the many interpretations of dryosaurus video next
"I'm going to make the movie appeal to a younger audience..." - executive who knows absolutely nothing about the common folk, let alone children
This movie reminded me of those “Bad Lip Reading” videos that were popular during the time it came out in.
7:39 Asguardians ?
Also, both Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron and Walking with Dinosaurs 3D: The Movie are not quite bad I don't hate these movies not at all
Ce film est de si bonne qualité qu’il est encore réaliste 11 ans après sa sortie 💀
@@laseriedeladilophosaure9246 I don't get it
Even though they don't talk
Very Late Cretaceous Alaska really looked like the Alaska shown in the movie
I thought it was good but the talking and the hole dumb opening with the humans that weren’t needed and I thought it they had three different stories of dinosaurs and they could have this story as the final story it could have been better and some song in this were not great but I thought the last song for the credits was Catchy but overall if they make another walking with dinosaurs movie after the reboot series if it’s good they could actually use the potential for it
Gorgon: a single father trying to feed his kids
Scowler: literally tries to murder his own brother
Guess who’s the villain?
I absolutely loved this movie as a kid and I still do. It's not great by any objective metric. The dialogue and story could have been great had the writing not been a secondary objective and they definitely should have given more indication that they actually were talking rather than being telepathic. But overall this movie just exudes that childlike wonder and amazement for dinosaurs that I just can't get enough of. And the music was great fight me.
Quetzalcoatlus was thought to have a massive range that might have gone up to where Alaska is today.
The voiceovers alone turned an otherwise okay/decent movie to a nuisance to listen to.
Definitely not great cinema but I have nostalgia for it.
And its designs are great
13:46
"Those additions where made primarily for children in mind- and I am not a children..." I like those really small jokes you throw in, like this goofy grammar,
While the Documentary is the superior version, I wish they kept some of the smaller scenes like the 3 Quetzies in the rain, which is then paralleled with the same trio at spring, which is then followed up by a family of Alphadon emerging aswell. That and the scene where Patchi passes by serval creatures on his way back the herd being cut down. Though I am prolly just nitpicking. Really wish the Createous Cut weren’t just a DVD exclusive. Also, I disagree with the choice of renaming the Gorgo to Nanuq, I’d rather misinform location rather than design, if I had to pick one.
I went and saw it in theatres with my wife. I... Did not know just how bad the talking was gonna be... If I even knew there was gonna be talking. But it was a miserable experience. Yeah the creature design and CGI was beautiful... But they also have a scene where the kid gets pooped on. Like... We almost left.
Maybe I'll try and find the documentary version some time. I would LOVE to think about pachyrhinosaurus without thinking of that disaster of a movie.
Have you ever heard of the Cretaceous cut? It's a version of the film without the humans and the dialogue. I recommend you watch it.
I disagree. It's not that bad at all for many reasons for what it is: 1. It introduces different species of dinosaurs instead of featuring the same old ones that we all know, like the overrated t-Rex for example. 2. It's the only dinosaur movie that is more realistic in terms of the factual information for educational purposes, yet it depicts itself as a hybrid of mainstream entertainment and education which makes this movie unique. 3. It's silly humor is firmly tongue-in-cheek, and while not every comedic line hits the mark, most of it's humor is funny. 4. The voice acting dubs over the animals so the audience can understand how dinosaurs as well as other creatures/animals communicate with each other. It's been 10 years since this underrated gem came out (I saw it in theaters when I was 14 years old), and I actually still love this movie. 3.5/4 stars.
Love you 🤟 keep up the good work 👍
i forgot this movie even existed and i saw it when it came out 😭
That’s one of my favourite Dinosaur movies is a masterpiece
This is word for word my opinion also, I was pretty hype to watch it back when it came out but the cheesy voice over was just. Too distracting, really took it outta me. I didn't know they released a documentary version though, I need to go hunt that down!
I love everything dinosaur and when i was a kid i enjoyed this movie more than jurassic park even tho park is more iconic
"I am not a children"
I do like to when a Dino documentary does other species of tyrannosaurs.
I Did Like This Review A Lot Now I Did Watch the Movie as a Kid So Im Fine With the Jokes But That Line for the Creataous Cut (that was Great)
I actually like the movie as it is. With the dialogues and jokes hehe
So do I, I actually tolerated them
"I am not a children."
This was my brothers child Hood film :)
Honestly, if you don’t focus on the dialogue then you can see this as a great movie. This movie is not bad in the slightest and all of this hate should have been towards the movie Dino Time.
I felt bad for you because since your favorite dinosaur was a pachyrhinosaurus since Jurassic Fight Club was depicted horribly, Disney's Dinosaur when the pachyrhinosaurus get taken down by a carnotaurus and now we have THIS movies.
“I’m not a children”😂
Just watch the version with no talking
A version like that exists!? Where can I watch it?
the executives are so dumb as FOX are morons
@@shadowmarauder6033I believe the dvd has a part called “cretaceous cut” option
Even with the voices its still fun
Missed opportunity to refer to the dialogue as “dinologue”
I like this movie, however i do think that cutting out the talking in turn for narration would be better
*Youre not ending every other sentence with "you know" when talking to us.*
"I am not a children" 😂😂😂 why is that funny???
Yes it's bad! I was expecting a feature length walking with dinosaurs episode and instead we got a Disney's Dinosaur knock off.
NON, ce n’est pas mauvais de mon point de vue ces celle de d’autre personne.
My gripe with this movie was the fact that it only focused on one time piriod. When I hear the title "Walking with Dinosaurs", I obviously think of the show, so I expected that they would show dinos from all of the mesozoic era. I have a similar gripe with Prehistoric Planet. Don't get me wrong, I love the show, but prehistory covers more than just the era of the dinosaurs. A more accurate name for the show would be "Cretaceous Planet" as that is the time period that the show focuses on. By the way, you inspired me to download Prehistoric Kingdom! Lastly, you should give the documovie "March of the Dinosaurs" a try. I really enjoyed it when I was younger.
It's easier to have different settings in a series than in a single movie.
Better than The Good Dinosaur
The biggest sin of this movie outside of being barely watchable is having « Walking with dinosaurs » in its title. That I can’t forgive because even if you remove the whole dialog thing and other trash, it’s still a documentary who didn’t understood the source material. It’s not a WWD movie, it’s a shameless Disney’s Dinosaur ripoff. This one is by the way a 2000’ masterpiece. Not this 2013’ trash.
The dialogue reminds me of Snapcube fandubs if they were unfunny
Dude we are the same age
Bad??? NO WAY
Childis? Yes
Its a passable movie it just shouldn't have been called Walking With Dinosaurs
I watched only once this *thing* and right after just five minutes I dropped it because man, this movie hurts both physically and mentally... If somebody ask me what is the best definition of pain, I'll tell them to watch this crap of a movie
PLIOSAUR....
The reasons I hate this movie?
1. Location: it set in Alaska during a Cretaceous ice age so it would much colder
2. The animation and design: the design look to unspecialize for polar habitats and the animation is so terrible (specially on their mouths) that the lion king 2019(which interesting the same maker work on prehistoric planet) more realistic
3.the humans: the humans are so bland and forgettable their should be not in the movie and I was wasted when I see them at the beginning
So in short: if you meet someone who say the series is great 😊
But if you meet someone who say the movie is great😢
Unpopular opinion: People give this movie more hate than it deserves - and it deserves very little hate in my opinion. Looks good enough, has a basic story that is nor amazing nor awful - pretty regular family movie.
Everything is great,except for the voice acting
1:10 I think you shouldn't take the movie more serious than what it's trying to be, the movie works for what it is and the dialogue is part of it.
This movie is not from my time so I don't have any nostalgia towards it, and still I rewatched it last year and It's pretty good, If someday I have kids I definitely see myself showing them this movie.
Also, you said you love Disney's Dinosaur and actually for my that's the movie I found annoying as a kid. I've not watched it in many years, but I'm surprised you don't like the dialogue of this movie.
Also, I'd rather have the dinosaurs talking without moving their lips as a human, because that would have felt too artificial for me.
It’s a terrible Walking With Dinosaurs movie but it’s not a bad dinosaur movie….. it’s one of the better dinosaur movies, it’s not excellent but it was not terrible either it was just a mediocre, a bad walking with dinosaurs movie and a mediocre dinosaur movie
I mean there are plenty of dinosaurs movies that are even worse than Walking with dinosaurs 2013, I mean look at “I am T.Rex” from 2023 that film is a lot worse than Walking with dinosaur 2013 in my opinion
The voice acting on the characters are just awful, That's what ruins this movie, The dinosaurs weren't even talking at all, Just some dumb voice overs like how people dubbed animals on those TH-cam videos, Dinosaur designs are great but the film would been better without the childish dialogue
I have to give this movie the nickname, “The Movie That’s Hated For A Very Stupid Reason.”
It's not a very stupid reason!!!
I just don’t think that talking should be enough to ruin a movie.
Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron and Walking with Dinosaurs 3D: The Movie comparison
@@MarkTheDilophosaurus281You don't [___]ing hate this movie especially Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron
I never saw Spirit, and WWD 2013 is actually a great movie