similar but different. technicolor use some kind of prism to divide the colour and record every colour channel simultaneously not doing three exposure with different filter. this is like kinemacolor not technicolor
This was demonstrated with three filters an enlarger and three copies of black n white negative using an enlarger .It worked. You can also duplicate and old black n white photo to three copies to digital on the computer or film negative up laded on the compter and sensitize them to three colors and turn them into better than colorized photos too
A digital camera is sub-optimal for this process, as it already has separation filters in the form of a Bayer filter on the sensor. It will produce additive and cancellation effects, producing color aliasing. It will work, but you will get much better results using analog panchromatic film. Larger formats are also easier to work with.
I do too, but if it wasn't done 3 times with 3 color filters, the color information is not there in the picture. It would be wonderful if you could reverse engineer it that way, but you can't. So disappointing.
Why would you take photos of anything that might move between shots and try to combine them into one still frame? How about shooting completely still stationary scenes? Why invite unnecessary work and complications?
This is just to demonstrate how this process works, where the color comes from, is not a practical solution unless you want to use it for artistic purposes.
Every color process works this way, with separation filters, whether they are built into an emulsion stack or on separate negatives. Theoretically you can obtain better separation and therefore more accurate colors using separate negatives. Even the highest quality dye-transfer process works this way. The only problem with sequential images is movement artefacts, sometimes called “color parallax”.
Very well made explanation of the process, and you got great results! Thank you
Really fascinating. It's like those experimental Russian photos from the turn of the century.
Muchas gracias por compartir la información!!!!! La foto de la chica y las rosas parece sacada de los años 50!! bravo!
Good video. That's pretty much the method used by James Clerk Maxwell for his tartan ribbon in 1861. But he didn't have a computer.
if i like this video you ask? i fucking love it! great job! much love
Great video
I just brought a BW film and I can't wait to try this once I get my colour filters :)
stunning!
YES!! thank you i wanted to see a vid on this the first color photo was taken with this method
You basically did Technicolor but digital.
similar but different. technicolor use some kind of prism to divide the colour and record every colour channel simultaneously not doing three exposure with different filter. this is like kinemacolor not technicolor
@@bebekdragon7604 Not technicolor but AUTOCHROME! This is such a revolutionary!
@@bebekdragon7604 Kinemacolor is just like Technicolor. But you leave blue out of the equation.
Also technicolor had a forth frame for key
Where did you buy those filters
This was demonstrated with three filters an enlarger and three copies of black n white negative using an enlarger .It worked. You can also duplicate and old black n white photo to three copies to digital on the computer or film negative up laded on the compter and sensitize them to three colors and turn them into better than colorized photos too
This is incredible, im gonna try it with my brownie 120 camera
Did you adjust exposure for each filter or it's the same for every shot? In that case,
combine rgb is it work for old black & white movie?
Could you tell me where you bought that camera? Please?
thanks.that really cool
Cool vid, thanks!
bellooo bello
That's how NASA takes every picture of non moving objects actually.
Why did you use film if you were going to assemble the images in software?
A digital camera would've worked fine.
A digital camera is sub-optimal for this process, as it already has separation filters in the form of a Bayer filter on the sensor. It will produce additive and cancellation effects, producing color aliasing. It will work, but you will get much better results using analog panchromatic film. Larger formats are also easier to work with.
I wish I could do it with one original black and white picture
I do too, but if it wasn't done 3 times with 3 color filters, the color information is not there in the picture. It would be wonderful if you could reverse engineer it that way, but you can't. So disappointing.
In my dictionary, analog cameras are "normal" cameras.
Why would you take photos of anything that might move between shots and try to combine them into one still frame? How about shooting completely still stationary scenes? Why invite unnecessary work and complications?
This is just to demonstrate how this process works, where the color comes from, is not a practical solution unless you want to use it for artistic purposes.
This is a lot easier to do in gimp
auto align
suppaqr
This is a cheap three color Technicolor process, this is crap
this process dates back Technicolor, it was actually made in 1905.
Every color process works this way, with separation filters, whether they are built into an emulsion stack or on separate negatives. Theoretically you can obtain better separation and therefore more accurate colors using separate negatives. Even the highest quality dye-transfer process works this way. The only problem with sequential images is movement artefacts, sometimes called “color parallax”.