For the visuals, i think that disney is trying to be the most realistic possible(especially for the backgrounds), while pixar is slowly trying to stylise its movies like in turning red or luca for example
True, but funny how that leads to Disney ending up with idealized visuals (majestic landscapes, model body types [albeit they are sloooowly loosening up there], cleaned up anthropomorphic animals) while Pixar has the more every day body types, plain but still wide and real land/cityscapes, and dares to make its animals fuzzy (= "not relying on cute"). A story with pretty magical beings in a (more or less) historically (and architecturally) accurate environment by Disney may look more surreal and fantastical than a story about ...living cars set in a world that is a freaky (less accurate, often exaggerated) superficial (stream-lined?) replication of ours. However, the lines are (beginning to get) blurry - visually, tonally and thematically. [Edited bc I accidentally tried to make Ratatouille a pure Disney movie, which serves to stress my last point XD)
Weird for me it's the opposite. Sure Disney is very stylized, but grounded in real world anatomy and the aesthetics of drawings, paintings and dolls. Disney humans at the very least skew more humans like in an idealized way. While Pixar is more radical in their human design choices. Mr.Incredible, Captain McCrea, Mama Coco and the like are more cartoony compared to a Flynn Rider, Elsa or Hiro Hamada. It's only Lightyear in my opinion that went full realism.
Its true about the endings in Pixar. While the story wrapped up, you can tell the characters aren't done going on with their lives and struggles. We even see after credits in Pixar movies showing that the characters still trying to adjust with their lives.
Right on point. This is why they make incredible sequels on top of that. Although the main conflict is resolved, there is still so much for the characters left which can be incorporated in another film.
Honestly, if it weren't for the princesses' hairstyles, I would not be able to tell their silhouettes apart. As the video noted, they're all pretty much hourglass-shaped.
Yep Pixar definitely has its way of getting you in the feels for their movies and even as a young adult both studios have really influenced and helped shaped the person I am today... 🇳🇦🇳🇦🇳🇦
Except Turning Red. The movie just made me feel annoyed with the little brat who didn't get any better and if anything only was even more of a brat by the end. The only character development was her mom no longer being overprotective but instead not being protective enough. Her dad almost had character development but instead of being equal as a parent, he only said what he wanted to tell her and then continued to not have a say in anything that happened. Such a weird movie.
@@flatsamiscoolHow was she a brat? She always did what her mom told her, yet her mom was still overprotective and toxic as hell. This movie portrays exactly what happens when parents behave this way.
@@tmm4195 She completely goes against many different things she says and yells "My panda, my choice!" Which makes a piece of me díe inside every time I think of it, but she's just annoying af. She goes out into the city on her own and goes against many of the things she's told to do. She's thirteen. Not an adult. She absolutely should be respecting her mom just like anyone of any age should, but especially thirteen year olds.
@@flatsamiscool You understand she always respected her mom until her mom got too overbearing right? Like literally going to the store and completely humiliating her and creeping at her school watching her through binoculars. It’s called generational trauma and her mom was putting her through her it.
I feel like Disney is really limited, they don’t do a lot of opened stuff, meanwhile Pixar likes to make things relatable and make people feel more opened up, and they don’t care about who or what you are, they accept anything.
Pixar films are deeper and more mature. As we grow up, we learn that happy ever afters are rare in our real world, and we become more accepting and appreciating of the endings of Pixar films.
I've seen Raya and the Last Dragon a couple times. I don't think it's terrible, but it's definitely not as good as other Disney films. When I saw it the first time, up until the reveal that the other girl was actually tricking her, I legitimately thought it was gonna be the first girl on girl love interest.
I feel like Disney movies always have the same structure as far as the order of events goes but for Pixar, the event orders change so you never really know which way the story will go and that's what makes Pixar more likely to pull heartstrings as well. If something sad happens, it isn't always predictable from the beginning of the movie but for Disney it is
I feel like the inclusion of lgbtq stuff isn't necessary for either company to do considering its for children and nothing about a person sex is going to make a better for them
It’s NOT about sex, It’s about representation so kids can see themselfs and/or see how normal is to have all kinds of love, not just the same and old hetero love that has been shown and forced on us in every single media. Having lgbtq stuff won’t make the movie better but won’t hurt either…
The aim is representation. To show that it's okay to be different, to spread acceptance of different genders and sexualities. To show that they have the right to like what they like and not be ostracized for it. Boys can like feminine things, girls can like masculine things - it's their freedom to choose. It's not just about sex.
In Disney the Protagonist is usually very likable. While in Pixar they tend to be more of a jerk, giving them room to grow. Where Disney other than learning that one lesson they didn't grow that much.
one difference between the two: Disney makes bad movies, and Pixar makes shorts that are better than most Disney movies. a fact: since Disney bought Pixar, Pixar is slowly learning to make the corny characters like Disney does. example: elemental, where it says "Elements dont mix!" and the fire girl is like "wow I hate that rule im going to be the person to change it and make the world a better place!" which is basically a lot of Disney characters like in zootopia
I feel like both are not comparable. Disney is great and I feel like they have chosen their speciality and understood their limits which is not a bad choice ( even if I feel like they're very money oriented which could be Pixar's case too idk but it could do them wrong in the future...). Pixar has a special place in my heart, it's so realistically optimistic. They have something to them, their characters are so relatable and different in their own way, they almost seem real. Their philosophy is exigent but understanding and empathetic. They are artists for sure! Also when you look at all the process they do to make every movie the most realistic and incredible way possible, it's amazing. For Up in particular. They go above and beyond the surface. Turn red was the last one I saw and it was very good! Of course they don't have the right to fail!! If they dare do one average movie that would be their last death wish...
Basic theme. Disney animations tend to be about people (particularly princesses) who already have plenty but want something more. Somehow, being a princess just isn't good enough. And by the end, they get what they want, more on top of plenty. Pixar protagonists more often start fully satisfied with their lives, happy in their moment, wanting nothing more. Then life forces a drastic, unwanted change upon them. By the end of the movie, they have not solved the problem...they've just adapted to it, learned to live with it and to be happy in spite of it. This may be why Pixar is more relatable to adults...adults will have been through more of those "life comes at you hard" moments, and a lot fewer of the "princess gets her prince" moments.
The thing is Disney story are more self-aware based, a hero's journey while Pixar's story involves many characters, a sense of community based stories not just the self
I remember hearing years ago that for Pixar, at least some of these choices were conscious strategic decisions, specifically, "No princesses singing 'I Want...' songs."
Nice video. I enjoyed seeing the differences between Disney and Pixar. And I think with Disney their characters and storylines in movies. Aren’t always relatable. While with Pixar their characters and storylines are relatable. Because they face relatable situations
I will regret if I don't post this The frase "With great power comes great responsibility " did become popular with marvel But it wasn't first mentioned in spiderman nor in the whole marvel (not sure about the comics sry) It was in 1985 movie "Teen Wolf" Moreover that movie was where Pixar got the idea of "Turning Red"(love the cartoon but still) And there are more of that stuff, they take lines and ideas from 80s films ALL THE TIME (look at Rick and Morty and time mashine for hells sake) I'm sorry if I sound like a jerk, but watching through most of old films we can definitely tell that no monstrously new ideas have been made. Kinda heavy if you put it that way, but we can find every idea of a "brand new film" in timeline from 60s till 80s Love your videos, especially this one ❤ I am 15, I love pixar even more than disney for the cartoons, but after watching smth new and rewatching films from the past I would definitely say that they rerun all the ideas over and over again
Yes, Turning Red takes much from Teen Wolf (which starred Micheal J Fox). And Cars takes much from Doc Hollywood (another film that starred Michael J Fox). Of course, Rick and Morty takes much from Back to the Future (yet another Michael J Fox film).
Ngl, Disney gives me a more curious and mysterious fantasy feeling while Pixar nails the playful and childlike feelings for me. It’s like I can casually watch Pixar anytime and have a great time but it has to be the right day and moment of feeling to watch a Disney movie for that magical feeling.
Disney protagonists tend to be well-off young women who just want more and then get it. Pixar protagonists tend to be ordinary people who lose their current lives and learn to deal with that change.
In short Disney is for small kids who actually has to keep an imagination and believe in fantasy world ( you don’t want a five years old to have a reality check and make them believe that life is hard) but pixar is more for the grown up kids 10+ years old, that’s where they start to grow up and see life for what it really is
If you think about Buddy Pine, aka sindrome, is like what could have happened to mha/bnha's main protagonist Izuku Midoriya, aka Deku, if he had given up on being a hero and went villain. It's cool to see would could have been in something other than a bias fanfic!
I find with disney, it's like "yeah we're gonna do a film now with only white caucasian people/african americans/mexicans/asians/People from New Orleans/ People from Columbia etc, whereas Pixar has a cultural diversity, lots of different people from different cultures involved in the one film. For example, in Aladdin there's just Arabic people or Moana islander people, whereas in Incredibles you have a white caucasian family with an african american best friend, an "asian" fashion designer and in Incredibles 2 all the other superheros have different coloured hair, skin, etc. Anyone else noticed this?
I tend to prefer stories that are more "realistic" so I would say I prefer Pixar movies in general. I don't like when there is no limit to magic or powers...usually it goes out of control and there are plot holes everywhere.
Disney characters have no sense of friendship, like we barely even see friendships on the screen, Disney only sees lovers as worthy protagonists, they don't think that a friendship is really good while Pixar has the most amazing balance between romance and friendship, from Toy Story, Luca to Turning red. They have never shyed away from protagonist that aren't lovers. Toy story is what I mean by a good balance, there's enough romance but it doesn't make one dirft away form Buss and Woody, but the love stories always stay prominent.
I prefer Pixar. The story feels more realistic and related with audiences. Even when they make story about princess like Merida, the setting and the story feels much more realistic than Disney. I am fan of Pixar,
The LGBTQIA+ rep thing, i wanna add for Disney, in the baymax shorts of big hero six, the character "Tadashi" is shown to like men. Thats all i know on this topic though
I am still unable to understand people’s need to educate kids with gender roles and affiliations… they need to grow up, when they are the right age they’ll figure out. Why force it to them by putting it in school curriculum, movies (kids/animated ones). It’s the older generation who needs to be educated, so that they learn to accept their kids instead of giving them a tough time and hence creating a safe space for the kids who are growing up and trying to figure out.
I like Pixar more than Disney. Say what you want but man, ratatouille inspired me to cook dishes. And after years of practice in my home, I can make pretty good dishes now! Everyone can cook :D
Disney is a part of my soul... Alice in Wonderland, Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid, Lion King - there are too many gems to count. I do enjoy Pixar's movies as well, but I find them not as memorable for me personally. I now see I tend to gravitate toward the magic, panoramic sweeping scenery, and highlighted fantasy elements. Did not care for Turning Red though. It was truly painful for me to watch. Very informative video!
I would really love a video discussing deep details of Encanto compiled togather instead of some arbitrary theories which make no sense. Like during dinner scene, adults except pepa have wine and children have what appears to be fruit juice. This is plot relevant because obviously, children should not drink. And, in case pepa gets hungover, she can flood entire town. During what else can I do, I always thought Isabela got her new powers during this song. But, I realised that Isabela already had powers to make crazy plants but, she wasn't allowed to. I mean she was already making wines which is not a flower. Abuela knew that Isabela can produce such wild plants and pressured her to only produce nice flowers. Because when Abuela sees Isabela after the song, she is like "Out of control". Does that mean she was controlling her? Another line which hints at this theory is that, Isabela says: "What could I do if I just knew it didn't need to be perfect? It just needed to be? And they'd let me be?". They referred to whom? This clearly confirms that she is being pressured to not to produce figs, hurricane of Jacarandas. Also, the fact that Jacarandas and Palma de Cera are less delicate plants than Flor de mayo and roses says a lot about the stprywriters of this movie. We don't talk about Bruno has so many details I can write an essay. I am writing some uncommon ones which few people know. Felix says "Abuela brings umbrellas" so she preferred bringing umbrella instead of comforting pepa. The way surrounding sounds contribute to music like chest tapping, glass breaking, sound of steps, etc. There is also iconic foreshadowing at the end. Isabela and Dolores singing I am fine, I am fine.... These are just songs. There are even more subtle details throughout the movie which I am forgetting also, my comment is already too long. But, do include these hidden details which I wrote here.
There is only one disney movie that I know which is more like pixar, but it isn't. That's Brother Bear. That movie is an emotional rollercoaster, it's beautiful, and not princess or romatic love central. And there isn't a real villain. If you read this and haven't seen that movie: please take a look at it!
Disney will run a good thing into the ground. They also own everything and have extended how long copyrights last by decades. Just before their old mouse cartoons lapsed, they made a parody of themselves in that style...If you think that wasn't to sue someone who tried similar, you don't know how they sued an elementary school that is named after Disney for having Character likenesses in a mural. The mouse is evil man...don't give them money.
Disney makes musicals. Pixar makes films. Personally, I think Disney has made some of the best musicals ever made, so 5his isn't by any means a criticism. But everything you noted can be summed up by realising the two studios simply don't aim for the same end product
about sequels, I think that wasn't disney's thing period. the straight to vhs era was just a cash bag and the company was absolutely aware of it at the time. it's exactly what's going on with the live action movies. pixar on the other hand had sequels in their bag of tricks, it wasn't just a fad. i think disney could make good sequels if they cared to, but the disney company is always playing safe with news releases, and nowadays that includes pixar. it mostly depends on who's at the head of the company at the time, which is depressing.
actually in the big hero 6 mini series, disney puts there 2 LGBTQ+ characters (theres a guy inviting another guy on date and then theres a small scene with ''guy'' who is trans with trans flag on his shirt)
For the visuals, i think that disney is trying to be the most realistic possible(especially for the backgrounds), while pixar is slowly trying to stylise its movies like in turning red or luca for example
True, but funny how that leads to Disney ending up with idealized visuals (majestic landscapes, model body types [albeit they are sloooowly loosening up there], cleaned up anthropomorphic animals) while Pixar has the more every day body types, plain but still wide and real land/cityscapes, and dares to make its animals fuzzy (= "not relying on cute").
A story with pretty magical beings in a (more or less) historically (and architecturally) accurate environment by Disney may look more surreal and fantastical than a story about ...living cars set in a world that is a freaky (less accurate, often exaggerated) superficial (stream-lined?) replication of ours.
However, the lines are (beginning to get) blurry - visually, tonally and thematically.
[Edited bc I accidentally tried to make Ratatouille a pure Disney movie, which serves to stress my last point XD)
Yeah, Pixar really likes playing with faces shapes like Up
Meanwhile Shrek
yeah!!💗💗
Weird for me it's the opposite. Sure Disney is very stylized, but grounded in real world anatomy and the aesthetics of drawings, paintings and dolls. Disney humans at the very least skew more humans like in an idealized way. While Pixar is more radical in their human design choices. Mr.Incredible, Captain McCrea, Mama Coco and the like are more cartoony compared to a Flynn Rider, Elsa or Hiro Hamada. It's only Lightyear in my opinion that went full realism.
Disney is aspirational and timeless. Pixar is reflexive and in the moment. They complement each other pretty much.
Yes, exactly
(灬ºωº灬)
Agreed
Like Cola and Pepsi
@@timgorg1919 (´,,•ω•,,) maybe
Its true about the endings in Pixar. While the story wrapped up, you can tell the characters aren't done going on with their lives and struggles. We even see after credits in Pixar movies showing that the characters still trying to adjust with their lives.
Right on point. This is why they make incredible sequels on top of that. Although the main conflict is resolved, there is still so much for the characters left which can be incorporated in another film.
I'm still crying about luca
@@brewloml5079we all are
Like in Wall-E when humans started all over again on Earth, and in Up when Carl had a new adventure book documenting his life with Russell and Doug.
And that’s why Pixar is just so BEAUTIFUL to me
The Disney character designs were made to be very distinctive. You could see a silhouette and know who it is
pixar too imo
@@biancamariafrondoni7051 same
Honestly, if it weren't for the princesses' hairstyles, I would not be able to tell their silhouettes apart. As the video noted, they're all pretty much hourglass-shaped.
For me, Disney is when you want to escape from the real world and Pixar is when you want to live in a better version of it.
Yeah Toy Story is like the real world
Yep Pixar definitely has its way of getting you in the feels for their movies and even as a young adult both studios have really influenced and helped shaped the person I am today... 🇳🇦🇳🇦🇳🇦
Except Turning Red. The movie just made me feel annoyed with the little brat who didn't get any better and if anything only was even more of a brat by the end. The only character development was her mom no longer being overprotective but instead not being protective enough. Her dad almost had character development but instead of being equal as a parent, he only said what he wanted to tell her and then continued to not have a say in anything that happened. Such a weird movie.
@@flatsamiscool true
@@flatsamiscoolHow was she a brat? She always did what her mom told her, yet her mom was still overprotective and toxic as hell. This movie portrays exactly what happens when parents behave this way.
@@tmm4195 She completely goes against many different things she says and yells "My panda, my choice!" Which makes a piece of me díe inside every time I think of it, but she's just annoying af. She goes out into the city on her own and goes against many of the things she's told to do. She's thirteen. Not an adult. She absolutely should be respecting her mom just like anyone of any age should, but especially thirteen year olds.
@@flatsamiscool You understand she always respected her mom until her mom got too overbearing right? Like literally going to the store and completely humiliating her and creeping at her school watching her through binoculars. It’s called generational trauma and her mom was putting her through her it.
I’ve noticed that Pixar seems to be a LOT more diverse than Disney and I can’t be the only one
If anything, I think Disney's more diverse tho? I mean, most of the Pixar characters I remember aren't even human.
@@ceebbees12345 hence, diverse.
I feel like Disney is really limited, they don’t do a lot of opened stuff, meanwhile Pixar likes to make things relatable and make people feel more opened up, and they don’t care about who or what you are, they accept anything.
Pixar films are deeper and more mature. As we grow up, we learn that happy ever afters are rare in our real world, and we become more accepting and appreciating of the endings of Pixar films.
going with pixar. i'm a huge pixar fan & would choose almost any of theirs over almost any of disneys
Me too.
well yeah I feel like Coco’s existence is completely ignored in most of his points lol
and Brave…XD
I mean.....the director change in Brave was stupidly obvious & to its detriment, so i'll give that one a pass
yeah can you please tell me why? i mean i dont know why they didnt mention coco and brave?
@@rumzzzzzdid Disney and Pixar make movies together
I still love both Disney and Pixar movies ever since, I was a kid.
Same =)
I only love Pixar ones but theres a few i like from Disney
I've seen Raya and the Last Dragon a couple times.
I don't think it's terrible, but it's definitely not as good as other Disney films.
When I saw it the first time, up until the reveal that the other girl was actually tricking her, I legitimately thought it was gonna be the first girl on girl love interest.
I thought the same thing actually. There was heavy sapphic subtext, however unintentional
"It doesn't matter if there 42 78 a robot" best line.
6:09 ah yes, the three ages, 42, 78, and robot
I'm sorry, LION KING TWO? WAS I LIVING UNDER A ROCK
a difference for me is that i like modern Pixar movies but not Disney ones. i like old Disney.
I miss old Disney
@@TripleAAABatteriesStudio me too
Me too.
Disney(new): the kids will love it. Pixar: the family will love it.
Yeah exactly
thank you for putting it into words, now I fully understand why Pixar has a special place in my heart.
The first thing that came to mind when I saw the title was "Pixar makes us cry and contemplate our existence" and "Disney has happy endings"
I feel like Disney movies always have the same structure as far as the order of events goes but for Pixar, the event orders change so you never really know which way the story will go and that's what makes Pixar more likely to pull heartstrings as well. If something sad happens, it isn't always predictable from the beginning of the movie but for Disney it is
the facr i was so happy that not everyone forgot about ratatouille its just the best movie ever
I feel like the inclusion of lgbtq stuff isn't necessary for either company to do considering its for children and nothing about a person sex is going to make a better for them
Agreed
It’s NOT about sex, It’s about representation so kids can see themselfs and/or see how normal is to have all kinds of love, not just the same and old hetero love that has been shown and forced on us in every single media. Having lgbtq stuff won’t make the movie better but won’t hurt either…
Yea
The aim is representation. To show that it's okay to be different, to spread acceptance of different genders and sexualities. To show that they have the right to like what they like and not be ostracized for it. Boys can like feminine things, girls can like masculine things - it's their freedom to choose. It's not just about sex.
I love how you talked about the musical montages! The up montage made me cry though 😢
In Disney the Protagonist is usually very likable. While in Pixar they tend to be more of a jerk, giving them room to grow. Where Disney other than learning that one lesson they didn't grow that much.
I think an obvious one was missed. Disney movies almost always have a female protagonist and Pixar movies almost always have a male protagonist.
I think Disney is aimed toward girls and Pixar is aimed towards boys because Pixar has cars superhero’s toys
Dam they added aunt cause for a sassy aunt ad 😂
others:disney or pixar
me:dreamworks!🌙
You missed the live action versions: Many (Disney) vs 0 (Pixar)
In disney films, the characters sing
In pixar, they don't
I watched turning red recently and I was surprised at how many points I expected a cliche but the story stuck to being realistic. Loved it!
one difference between the two: Disney makes bad movies, and Pixar makes shorts that are better than most Disney movies. a fact: since Disney bought Pixar, Pixar is slowly learning to make the corny characters like Disney does. example: elemental, where it says "Elements dont mix!" and the fire girl is like "wow I hate that rule im going to be the person to change it and make the world a better place!" which is basically a lot of Disney characters like in zootopia
If I want to cry my eyes out, I'll watch Pixar, if I want a good time and sing with characters I love, I'll watch disney
I feel like both are not comparable. Disney is great and I feel like they have chosen their speciality and understood their limits which is not a bad choice ( even if I feel like they're very money oriented which could be Pixar's case too idk but it could do them wrong in the future...). Pixar has a special place in my heart, it's so realistically optimistic. They have something to them, their characters are so relatable and different in their own way, they almost seem real. Their philosophy is exigent but understanding and empathetic. They are artists for sure! Also when you look at all the process they do to make every movie the most realistic and incredible way possible, it's amazing. For Up in particular. They go above and beyond the surface. Turn red was the last one I saw and it was very good! Of course they don't have the right to fail!! If they dare do one average movie that would be their last death wish...
Basic theme. Disney animations tend to be about people (particularly princesses) who already have plenty but want something more. Somehow, being a princess just isn't good enough. And by the end, they get what they want, more on top of plenty.
Pixar protagonists more often start fully satisfied with their lives, happy in their moment, wanting nothing more. Then life forces a drastic, unwanted change upon them. By the end of the movie, they have not solved the problem...they've just adapted to it, learned to live with it and to be happy in spite of it. This may be why Pixar is more relatable to adults...adults will have been through more of those "life comes at you hard" moments, and a lot fewer of the "princess gets her prince" moments.
I love what you do
Disney is…okey but DREAMWORKS
Great analysis!
The thing is Disney story are more self-aware based, a hero's journey while Pixar's story involves many characters, a sense of community based stories not just the self
And that is why I love both! :D They are both amazing, and I get both out of this world fantasy, and more down to earth but still magical movies.
I remember hearing years ago that for Pixar, at least some of these choices were conscious strategic decisions, specifically, "No princesses singing 'I Want...' songs."
Nice video. I enjoyed seeing the differences between Disney and Pixar. And I think with Disney their characters and storylines in movies. Aren’t always relatable. While with Pixar their characters and storylines are relatable. Because they face relatable situations
I can't even distinguish between a Disney and Pixar movie
4:03 it's fantastque vs fantasy
I will regret if I don't post this
The frase "With great power comes great responsibility " did become popular with marvel
But it wasn't first mentioned in spiderman nor in the whole marvel (not sure about the comics sry)
It was in 1985 movie "Teen Wolf"
Moreover that movie was where Pixar got the idea of "Turning Red"(love the cartoon but still)
And there are more of that stuff, they take lines and ideas from 80s films ALL THE TIME (look at Rick and Morty and time mashine for hells sake)
I'm sorry if I sound like a jerk, but watching through most of old films we can definitely tell that no monstrously new ideas have been made. Kinda heavy if you put it that way, but we can find every idea of a "brand new film" in timeline from 60s till 80s
Love your videos, especially this one ❤
I am 15, I love pixar even more than disney for the cartoons, but after watching smth new and rewatching films from the past I would definitely say that they rerun all the ideas over and over again
Yes, Turning Red takes much from Teen Wolf (which starred Micheal J Fox).
And Cars takes much from Doc Hollywood (another film that starred Michael J Fox).
Of course, Rick and Morty takes much from Back to the Future (yet another Michael J Fox film).
Ngl, Disney gives me a more curious and mysterious fantasy feeling while Pixar nails the playful and childlike feelings for me.
It’s like I can casually watch Pixar anytime and have a great time but it has to be the right day and moment of feeling to watch a Disney movie for that magical feeling.
Coco is the only movie I thought Disney made it fully by themselves...it has a happy ending and good musics
Disney movies are almost always adaptations of something else, while Pixar is always (I think) original ideas.
Yeah, the "xyz lets gravity decide this" trope. Villains do tend to fall to their deaths with alarming frequency
Disney protagonists tend to be well-off young women who just want more and then get it. Pixar protagonists tend to be ordinary people who lose their current lives and learn to deal with that change.
Dream works. Just dream works.
did this guy just try to tell me that Luca is lighthearted? Ercole tried to commit murder
Yes you didn’t mention that Pixar has 0 live action movies while Disney has more live action movies
Pixar is more aimed at younger audiences (hence unrealistic animation), Disney is good for the whole family.
For some reason i don't enjoy the singing every 5 minutes 😂😂😂😂
Oh dear... THe time when Disney was actually dependable and timeless....
the DisneyxPixar movies are the best
In short Disney is for small kids who actually has to keep an imagination and believe in fantasy world ( you don’t want a five years old to have a reality check and make them believe that life is hard) but pixar is more for the grown up kids 10+ years old, that’s where they start to grow up and see life for what it really is
In my opinion I love Pixar
Disney Animation studios hasn't made many sequels. Other studios usually make they're sequels.
Tbh I prefer Pixar over Disney
They're both amazing though :D
This is why I like Pixar better.
If you think about Buddy Pine, aka sindrome, is like what could have happened to mha/bnha's main protagonist Izuku Midoriya, aka Deku, if he had given up on being a hero and went villain. It's cool to see would could have been in something other than a bias fanfic!
protagonists: Pixar will tell a story about anyone, who isn't a woman (except Red...)
Rattatoiulle will stay my favourite of them all :D
I find with disney, it's like "yeah we're gonna do a film now with only white caucasian people/african americans/mexicans/asians/People from New Orleans/ People from Columbia etc, whereas Pixar has a cultural diversity, lots of different people from different cultures involved in the one film. For example, in Aladdin there's just Arabic people or Moana islander people, whereas in Incredibles you have a white caucasian family with an african american best friend, an "asian" fashion designer and in Incredibles 2 all the other superheros have different coloured hair, skin, etc. Anyone else noticed this?
I tend to prefer stories that are more "realistic" so I would say I prefer Pixar movies in general. I don't like when there is no limit to magic or powers...usually it goes out of control and there are plot holes everywhere.
Disney characters have no sense of friendship, like we barely even see friendships on the screen, Disney only sees lovers as worthy protagonists, they don't think that a friendship is really good while Pixar has the most amazing balance between romance and friendship, from Toy Story, Luca to Turning red. They have never shyed away from protagonist that aren't lovers. Toy story is what I mean by a good balance, there's enough romance but it doesn't make one dirft away form Buss and Woody, but the love stories always stay prominent.
So Pixar is just better? Yep definitely
I prefer Pixar. The story feels more realistic and related with audiences. Even when they make story about princess like Merida, the setting and the story feels much more realistic than Disney. I am fan of Pixar,
LOVED this and you got all the good point down!
The real world is filled with hourglass figures. What's wrong with being a healthy, attractive female?
Why Luca gotta catch strays like that tho
The LGBTQIA+ rep thing, i wanna add for Disney, in the baymax shorts of big hero six, the character "Tadashi" is shown to like men. Thats all i know on this topic though
I am still unable to understand people’s need to educate kids with gender roles and affiliations… they need to grow up, when they are the right age they’ll figure out. Why force it to them by putting it in school curriculum, movies (kids/animated ones). It’s the older generation who needs to be educated, so that they learn to accept their kids instead of giving them a tough time and hence creating a safe space for the kids who are growing up and trying to figure out.
I would say Pixar movie never has a musical scene in it, but I don't really know
I like Pixar more than Disney. Say what you want but man, ratatouille inspired me to cook dishes. And after years of practice in my home, I can make pretty good dishes now!
Everyone can cook :D
Pixar needs to stop making sequel of toy story😢
Disney is a part of my soul... Alice in Wonderland, Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid, Lion King - there are too many gems to count. I do enjoy Pixar's movies as well, but I find them not as memorable for me personally. I now see I tend to gravitate toward the magic, panoramic sweeping scenery, and highlighted fantasy elements.
Did not care for Turning Red though. It was truly painful for me to watch.
Very informative video!
So what was Brave then? That’s a Pixar princess.
For #5, the terms you're looking for are diegetic vs non-diegetic
I would really love a video discussing deep details of Encanto compiled togather instead of some arbitrary theories which make no sense.
Like during dinner scene, adults except pepa have wine and children have what appears to be fruit juice. This is plot relevant because obviously, children should not drink. And, in case pepa gets hungover, she can flood entire town.
During what else can I do, I always thought Isabela got her new powers during this song. But, I realised that Isabela already had powers to make crazy plants but, she wasn't allowed to. I mean she was already making wines which is not a flower. Abuela knew that Isabela can produce such wild plants and pressured her to only produce nice flowers. Because when Abuela sees Isabela after the song, she is like "Out of control". Does that mean she was controlling her? Another line which hints at this theory is that, Isabela says:
"What could I do if I just knew it didn't need to be perfect?
It just needed to be? And they'd let me be?". They referred to whom? This clearly confirms that she is being pressured to not to produce figs, hurricane of Jacarandas. Also, the fact that Jacarandas and Palma de Cera are less delicate plants than Flor de mayo and roses says a lot about the stprywriters of this movie.
We don't talk about Bruno has so many details I can write an essay. I am writing some uncommon ones which few people know. Felix says "Abuela brings umbrellas" so she preferred bringing umbrella instead of comforting pepa. The way surrounding sounds contribute to music like chest tapping, glass breaking, sound of steps, etc. There is also iconic foreshadowing at the end. Isabela and Dolores singing I am fine, I am fine....
These are just songs. There are even more subtle details throughout the movie which I am forgetting also, my comment is already too long. But, do include these hidden details which I wrote here.
There is only one disney movie that I know which is more like pixar, but it isn't. That's Brother Bear. That movie is an emotional rollercoaster, it's beautiful, and not princess or romatic love central.
And there isn't a real villain.
If you read this and haven't seen that movie: please take a look at it!
Personally even on older pixas films they still feel good that might be because i grew up watching them tho so idk
Disney will run a good thing into the ground. They also own everything and have extended how long copyrights last by decades. Just before their old mouse cartoons lapsed, they made a parody of themselves in that style...If you think that wasn't to sue someone who tried similar, you don't know how they sued an elementary school that is named after Disney for having Character likenesses in a mural. The mouse is evil man...don't give them money.
Disney makes musicals. Pixar makes films. Personally, I think Disney has made some of the best musicals ever made, so 5his isn't by any means a criticism. But everything you noted can be summed up by realising the two studios simply don't aim for the same end product
7:27 when they actually have representation people blame them
the main different is that Pixar makes good movies
6:09 It's WALL E!!!!
There is quite enough "representation" We do not need more...
This felt very one sided, towards Pixar.
because Pixar is better!!
Okay hear me out. Essentially I feel like Disney makes animated films where pixar makes films that are animated
Honestly, I preferred Disney when it was drawn. I don't like their cgi style. Pixar is marginally better, but not by much.
Not me just now finding out there's both a Pocahontas sequel AND a Mulan sequel.
They're great. Watch them
about sequels, I think that wasn't disney's thing period. the straight to vhs era was just a cash bag and the company was absolutely aware of it at the time. it's exactly what's going on with the live action movies. pixar on the other hand had sequels in their bag of tricks, it wasn't just a fad. i think disney could make good sequels if they cared to, but the disney company is always playing safe with news releases, and nowadays that includes pixar. it mostly depends on who's at the head of the company at the time, which is depressing.
*Russian accent* in Disney hero slay dragon, in Pixar dragon is hero.
Pixar is better. Everyone should know this by now
actually in the big hero 6 mini series, disney puts there 2 LGBTQ+ characters (theres a guy inviting another guy on date and then theres a small scene with ''guy'' who is trans with trans flag on his shirt)
Decent video until that LGHDTV crap. They definitely don't need more of that.
i prefer pixar because i don't like when somebody starts to sing and they go tripin on front of the people. and no one cares