Great video guys. I tried Qdx Graphene recently and wasn't impressed. I had real problems with application and removal of the residue. It would not layer at all and even after a full prep on a naked panel it wasn't much better. 3 weeks down the line, 400 miles a week in the poor weather we had in May I washed it this week and it was almost dead. Your summary is spot on as well
You knocked it on the head with your summing up. These graphene products (and SiO2) don’t give any extra performance over the better performing products that have been around for a while.
Yes, we used the detail spray. When we were buying the graphene sprays I don't think their actual coating was available. Maybe it's something to revisit at a future date 👍
It is still all hype I had some Infinity Wax Graphine from launch, you are right it doesn't offer anything that's not out there. Just for transparency I am a Garage Therapy fan but nothing beats GT Sigma in terms of slickness.
I'd be interested to see a comparison between GT Sigma and Beadmaker. Beadmaker is hugely slick but my question is this, why do we want a product that's really slick? For me I don't touch my car or run .y hand over it. Being slick doesn't generally add to water behaviour, beadmaker being called "beadmaker" doesn't have the best water behaviour and that's super slick. I'm not interested in graphine, like luke says, it needs to go away until it can beat ceramics.
@@patrickvennard838 yeah, mine split terribly. ¼ inch layer of what I presume is graphene at the top, and no matter how hard I shake it there's always a little left
Great video as always, I hope the mystery product wasn't 2 sigma...lol have just used that and found it phenomenal. Interesting chat with Martin at ocd about qdx but seen you have been involved with that chat too 👍
I certainly won’t be rushing to get any of those products after watching this - although that 303 one looked very impressive. There’s so many amazing products without the “Graphene” labelling that can do the same, if not better than those. Great video, guys👌🏻
Out of all the ones we used, the 303 is the only one that says it's a "coating" rather than a quick detailer, and that said its the only one I've used again too.
Honestly Jake save your money bud on the other three. If you were to try only one then the 303 is worth a punt. Graphene on the whole though should go away until it can out perform ceramic until that point it's just unfounded hype.
Graphene is just a new hype word as ceramic was a few years back. 303 was impressive. Dont see many using their range apart from aerospace. Seemed the best of the lot tho. Doubt I'll be jumping on the graphene hype though.
Great video guys. I tried Qdx Graphene recently and wasn't impressed. I had real problems with application and removal of the residue. It would not layer at all and even after a full prep on a naked panel it wasn't much better. 3 weeks down the line, 400 miles a week in the poor weather we had in May I washed it this week and it was almost dead. Your summary is spot on as well
I'm really struggling to see why it's on the market. I never hear any positives about it.
What is the best alternative for home use?
You knocked it on the head with your summing up. These graphene products (and SiO2) don’t give any extra performance over the better performing products that have been around for a while.
Thanks Chris. It really is a case of the emperor's new clothes. If they do nothing different but cost more then that needs to be called out.
well 1 is a detail spray. Its not gonna compare to a sealant or wax
Loving the Hoodie as always Michael! 👊
It's comfy, what can I say 🤷♂️
My guess on the mystery product is Artdeshine Graphene Detailer, am I right?
No. Not that one.
Thanks mate great video again
Thank you👍
Good video. I think you were using the Adams Graphene Spray Detailer? They have a Adams Graphene Spray Coating which I would hope holds up better.
Yes, we used the detail spray. When we were buying the graphene sprays I don't think their actual coating was available. Maybe it's something to revisit at a future date 👍
Still the detailer spray was better than 303
Hello,I think that the Graphene 303 spray would be the best out the lot.great video.
It 100% is.
Definitely. Can't see why anyone would pay to use the others.
Good, honest review 👍. I think I'll stick with my fully tried and tested waxes for the time being, I know exactly what I'm getting with those 👍👍.
I think that's best Rob to be fair
It is still all hype I had some Infinity Wax Graphine from launch, you are right it doesn't offer anything that's not out there. Just for transparency I am a Garage Therapy fan but nothing beats GT Sigma in terms of slickness.
I'd be interested to see a comparison between GT Sigma and Beadmaker. Beadmaker is hugely slick but my question is this, why do we want a product that's really slick? For me I don't touch my car or run .y hand over it. Being slick doesn't generally add to water behaviour, beadmaker being called "beadmaker" doesn't have the best water behaviour and that's super slick.
I'm not interested in graphine, like luke says, it needs to go away until it can beat ceramics.
Did your Infinity Wax Graphene qdx split as bad as mine?
@@Michael-wx4fj In the bottle?
@@patrickvennard838 yeah, mine split terribly. ¼ inch layer of what I presume is graphene at the top, and no matter how hard I shake it there's always a little left
@@Michael-wx4fj That happened to me with Synergy Infinity Wax replaced it no questions asked.
Been using 303 for 8 months now ,love it and so do my costumers
I'm very impressed with the ambidextrous use of the power wash gun, Michael👏 ....3zero3 or 3oh3🤔😉😂🤣....super vid Team TBD
I try 🏌
Great video as always, I hope the mystery product wasn't 2 sigma...lol have just used that and found it phenomenal. Interesting chat with Martin at ocd about qdx but seen you have been involved with that chat too 👍
It wasn't 2 sigma. Don't think the GT lot would put anything out this poor.
@@TranquilityBaseDetailing damm right. GT can do nothing wrong in my eyes 👍
BTW. Was the mystery product a EZ one?
@@definitelynotadetailer wasn't an EZ product
@@Michael-wx4fj ok 👍🤣
I'm curios to know what that mystery product is, but guessing how poorly it performed, it must be a Car Chem product
It's not Car Chem...
Not Car Chem. You'd be shocked if you knew given what it costs
Like that one Fantic, haha!!!
why did you put 2 coats of the last one on ? not a fair comparison
We applied each according to the manufacturers instructions.
I've been around too long to spot a Rickroll... but I got Rickrolled! 🤦♂️
Curiosity always kills the cat 🤣
I'll take that win 🤣
Car Chem. I think I'd go with Infinity cheers Luke
Not Car Chem bud. If I had to go for Infinity Wax I'd rather spend my money on their Rapid Quick Detailer.
I certainly won’t be rushing to get any of those products after watching this - although that 303 one looked very impressive.
There’s so many amazing products without the “Graphene” labelling that can do the same, if not better than those. Great video, guys👌🏻
Out of all the ones we used, the 303 is the only one that says it's a "coating" rather than a quick detailer, and that said its the only one I've used again too.
Honestly Jake save your money bud on the other three. If you were to try only one then the 303 is worth a punt. Graphene on the whole though should go away until it can out perform ceramic until that point it's just unfounded hype.
Graphene is just a new hype word as ceramic was a few years back. 303 was impressive. Dont see many using their range apart from aerospace. Seemed the best of the lot tho.
Doubt I'll be jumping on the graphene hype though.
303 was significantly more impressive that the rest. I don't think graphene should be in products yet. It's offering nothing more than hype.
So in conclusion, just use bsd 😊
Correct 😂
Just clicked on the mystery product link 😄😄
This makes me happy😂
Adams was best sorry
It's wasn't. Sorry😂
Seriously though. Don't you think Adams have non graphene products that beat its own graphene based ones?
@@TranquilityBaseDetailing adams is better than 303, I got the feeling you were judgmental at the start of it... maybe you can compare them fairly
@@derekbittle7114 in what way is Adams better than 303 in your opinion?
@@TranquilityBaseDetailing definitely beads the best
@@derekbittle7114 just to check do you mean Adams graphene coating or graphene qd that we used in this video?
303 nano coat, period!