Great looking MOCs but quite expensive when you include the price of the instructions. Still, I enjoyed watching you tackle them. You could probably buy a nice tripod for the price of those instructions, then you could build with both hands!
True, half the price for the instructions would be a bit more sane for MOCs of this size. You are right, I really should do something about my shaky camera work haha
Injection points on the side of a part can be nice but they can also be problematic. Depending on how you use them, they can also be difficult to hide in a build and if they are not cut off very cleanly, they can even collide with neighbouring parts which cannot really happen that much with injection redisue on top of a stud.
That's an quite interesting topic. I just had a quick look in LEGO's terms of service (ideas.lego.com/terms) and found the following: "Should LEGO choose to no longer consider your submissions (whether as a Product Idea or Contest Entry) such as by deleting or archiving materials you have submitted, your submission expiring, or by not selecting your Product Ideas or Contest Entries in review, all rights assigned to LEGO above remain assigned to LEGO for a further period of three years from the date of deletion, and the limited, revocable license granted to the Product Idea or Contest Entry Owner above remains in effect for the same three year period. Should LEGO refuse your submission to the site (whether as a Product Idea or Contest Entry), all rights assigned to LEGO above revert to you." I understood the last sentence in such a way that the rejected entry is deleted before users can vote for it and only in this case the rights go back immediately to the creator. But it is very much possible that I over-interpreted there.
Oof... 15 € each and the instructions are bad quality... Really don't like that but the result looks pretty cool. I wouldn't call that instruction style "old school" but rather "lazy".
Great looking MOCs but quite expensive when you include the price of the instructions. Still, I enjoyed watching you tackle them. You could probably buy a nice tripod for the price of those instructions, then you could build with both hands!
True, half the price for the instructions would be a bit more sane for MOCs of this size. You are right, I really should do something about my shaky camera work haha
@@klemmkraft9000 Honestly, your one-handed builds and hand-held camera are part of the charm of your channel. If it isn't broke, don't fix it.
Injection points on the side of a part can be nice but they can also be problematic. Depending on how you use them, they can also be difficult to hide in a build and if they are not cut off very cleanly, they can even collide with neighbouring parts which cannot really happen that much with injection redisue on top of a stud.
That's absolutely true, injection points on the sides can be even more annoying than those on the studs when there is no way to hide them.
I think if your design gets rejected at Lego Ideas, that means you get your rights back immediately.
That's an quite interesting topic. I just had a quick look in LEGO's terms of service (ideas.lego.com/terms) and found the following:
"Should LEGO choose to no longer consider your submissions (whether as a Product Idea or Contest Entry) such as by deleting or archiving materials you have submitted, your submission expiring, or by not selecting your Product Ideas or Contest Entries in review, all rights assigned to LEGO above remain assigned to LEGO for a further period of three years from the date of deletion, and the limited, revocable license granted to the Product Idea or Contest Entry Owner above remains in effect for the same three year period. Should LEGO refuse your submission to the site (whether as a Product Idea or Contest Entry), all rights assigned to LEGO above revert to you."
I understood the last sentence in such a way that the rejected entry is deleted before users can vote for it and only in this case the rights go back immediately to the creator. But it is very much possible that I over-interpreted there.
@@klemmkraft9000 Interesting... I might have read that wrong.
Oof... 15 € each and the instructions are bad quality... Really don't like that but the result looks pretty cool. I wouldn't call that instruction style "old school" but rather "lazy".