In my 40s, never married, no kids and I find myself watching these type videos. Divorce Corp etc….Fascinating, educational, and interesting. Now I know what a deposition is.
I’m so Bless thank you so much for the knowledge, clarity and fortunately I’m going to be Calm. Understanding this process it gives me so much Clarity. Unfortunately I was not prepared for the deposition. But so Bless for this video. Thank you so much🙏❤️. God Bless everyone.❤️😘
Divorce lawyer for 30 years, gotta say this, most Divorce Judges come to each case with their mind fully made up. There is so very little “Judging” done, they read the papers and take a position, getting them to first disclose the position, then, changing as necessary that position, is the art of the practise as a Divorce lawyer. My Frank advice to about 85% of litigants is devote your energy to settlement rather than litigation, you will almost certainly get an overall better result.
@@redandblack1911 Hi Tony, I call them “Re-location” cases. I don’t know your case law on the topic. Depending on whether you’re working for the “relocating” parent or the objecting parent.the relocation is always the “custodial” parent. The real motive/s for relocation are almost infinite, but valid ones are such things as: work, housing, extended family, health. After taking a full history, it’s a matter of collecting admissible evidence, deposing it and then assessing the Responses. I have always read the cases on Hague Convention (International Recovery of Children) with interest. There are often quoted interesting Expert Opinion on the effect of various factors on children. I recall one relocation case where the Judge took the Bench and said words to the effect of “You will have to have a good case to get up on this”. I was acting for a Father seeking an Injunction against a move un-announced by the Mother but foreshadowed by the children. The current Orders were Consent Orders made after my client had succeeded in an Appeal and the matter had been remitted for Re-hearing. We obtained evidence, on subpoena, that the Mother had been negotiating the purchase of the property she now owned and was proposing to move to, while the original Tria AND the Appeal AND the re-hearing were being conducted AND hadn’t disclosed the planned re-location to the Father, the Court or the Children until after the Final Orders were consented to, then only incidentally to the children. In effect, she planned to skip, create a status-quo and stonewall. The Judge granted the Injunction, gave a Costs Order in favour of the Father and granted the Father the right to lodge a Lien on the title of the Mothers property, as security for her compliance with the Orders she had consented to being made.
Is This a Fair Judgment?Located in San Anselmo , Marin, CA，3 bedrooms,3 bathroom, 2125 sqft.Have sun panel on the roofs, conditioning, two parking garage. There are three schools nearby. Only five to ten minutes to drive to those schools. The pice is 1.89 to 2.21 M from Zestimate. But the judge went down the pice to 1.65. Why?? Where I get the answer?? This is the fair American law??
In my 40s, never married, no kids and I find myself watching these type videos. Divorce Corp etc….Fascinating, educational, and interesting. Now I know what a deposition is.
I’m so Bless thank you so much for the knowledge, clarity and fortunately I’m going to be Calm.
Understanding this process it gives me so much Clarity.
Unfortunately I was not prepared for the deposition. But so Bless for this video.
Thank you so much🙏❤️.
God Bless everyone.❤️😘
Divorce lawyer for 30 years, gotta say this, most Divorce Judges come to each case with their mind fully made up. There is so very little “Judging” done, they read the papers and take a position, getting them to first disclose the position, then, changing as necessary that position, is the art of the practise as a Divorce lawyer. My Frank advice to about 85% of litigants is devote your energy to settlement rather than litigation, you will almost certainly get an overall better result.
Any input on move away cases and is what you describe here applicable to move away cases? Thank you!
@@redandblack1911 Hi Tony, I call them “Re-location” cases. I don’t know your case law on the topic. Depending on whether you’re working for the “relocating” parent or the objecting parent.the relocation is always the “custodial” parent. The real motive/s for relocation are almost infinite, but valid ones are such things as: work, housing, extended family, health. After taking a full history, it’s a matter of collecting admissible evidence, deposing it and then assessing the Responses. I have always read the cases on Hague Convention (International Recovery of Children) with interest. There are often quoted interesting Expert Opinion on the effect of various factors on children. I recall one relocation case where the Judge took the Bench and said words to the effect of “You will have to have a good case to get up on this”. I was acting for a Father seeking an Injunction against a move un-announced by the Mother but foreshadowed by the children. The current Orders were Consent Orders made after my client had succeeded in an Appeal and the matter had been remitted for Re-hearing. We obtained evidence, on subpoena, that the Mother had been negotiating the purchase of the property she now owned and was proposing to move to, while the original Tria AND the Appeal AND the re-hearing were being conducted AND hadn’t disclosed the planned re-location to the Father, the Court or the Children until after the Final Orders were consented to, then only incidentally to the children. In effect, she planned to skip, create a status-quo and stonewall. The Judge granted the Injunction, gave a Costs Order in favour of the Father and granted the Father the right to lodge a Lien on the title of the Mothers property, as security for her compliance with the Orders she had consented to being made.
Is This a Fair Judgment?Located in San Anselmo , Marin, CA，3 bedrooms,3 bathroom, 2125 sqft.Have sun panel on the roofs, conditioning, two parking garage. There are three schools nearby.
Only five to ten minutes to drive to those schools. The pice is 1.89 to 2.21 M from Zestimate. But the judge went down the pice to 1.65. Why?? Where I get the answer?? This is the fair American law??