This is quite interesting. Every time I watch a new video regarding Hebrew, I learn something new each time. I have been studying for three years. It has been a difficult journey. However things are beginning to connect. Dageshim and shevaim have always been easy but tricky in the past. The reason is that I had not internalized all of the components. Also I am free from stress and my thinking is a lot clearer. Truly enjoying the Hebrew language and the readings. Your explanations are brilliant. Thank you.
When you got into ishshah, I was hoping you'd follow with ishah. Very different. Your explanations were very good, and I understand the dagesh forte much better now. Thanks.
Why would it not be valid though? Because the nikkud and relative symbols are not necessarily required when fluency is mastered ,anyway so the markers are almost all training wheels so to speak except for the cantilation marks? I'm open to correction
From what I understand the Masoretes (working from about the 5th - 10th centuries) added the nikkud, cantilation, etc. so as not to lose the reading tradition that had been handed down orally.
You're absolutely right but what I'm asking is or what I was asking was you know I don't I don't really understand how it's valid because without the naked or Nico dough there's no dots whatsoever so I'm just curious how that works anyways you're right and I'm just kind of struggling with it
This is quite interesting. Every time I watch a new video regarding Hebrew, I learn something new each time. I have been studying for three years. It has been a difficult journey. However things are beginning to connect. Dageshim and shevaim have always been easy but tricky in the past. The reason is that I had not internalized all of the components. Also I am free from stress and my thinking is a lot clearer. Truly enjoying the Hebrew language and the readings. Your explanations are brilliant. Thank you.
When you got into ishshah, I was hoping you'd follow with ishah. Very different.
Your explanations were very good, and I understand the dagesh forte much better now. Thanks.
BLESS YOU
Very good job!
Very clear! Thank you!
Why would it not be valid though? Because the nikkud and relative symbols are not necessarily required when fluency is mastered ,anyway so the markers are almost all training wheels so to speak except for the cantilation marks? I'm open to correction
From what I understand the Masoretes (working from about the 5th - 10th centuries) added the nikkud, cantilation, etc. so as not to lose the reading tradition that had been handed down orally.
Are they similar to Dagesh Qal and Dagesh Chazaq? I read it from other grammars
dagesh qal = dagesh lene
dagesh ḥazaq = dagesh forte (doubling of consonant)
@@animatedhebrew Thank you.
Cool
You're absolutely right but what I'm asking is or what I was asking was you know I don't I don't really understand how it's valid because without the naked or Nico dough there's no dots whatsoever so I'm just curious how that works anyways you're right and I'm just kind of struggling with it
So, Dagesh should be pronounced as Daghesh, because letter Gim is undotted?
I pronounce gimel with a dot and gimel without a dot the same way.