Note how the pilot can drop the plane slowly for touch down, compare to AV-8B Harrier pilots that's required to turn down the engine quite significantly and slam the plane at the last one/two foot.
This dude is just jealous he probably lives in a broken down house and has never been laid, only from his mother who probably regretted having him and thought about having an abortion
@@worldoftancraft either not developed enough or done before but not revealed due to it being classified. many things about these jets the public doesnt know, because enemies can take all that data and make counters for them, rendering all the advanced tech almost useless
@@itzbrezaa do you understand that VTOL without being able to transit to horizontal flight is a useless plane-vtol? And it can, some videos show. Yet they aren't popular
29% turned out to be operational, and many many many models seem to just fizzle out somehow. Lockheed is a money grabbing corporation, the US government better get these contractors in check, this is of utmost importance.
@@Darakyoutane I've noticed a lot of the nato countries have issues with them as well. Watched a video of the British navy sending one into the ocean lmfao, you know though American acceptionalism at its best
@@Rorywizz well it's a 100 million dollar mistake everytime one of these f35 decideds to act up. I will accept that that unqualified woman "fighter pilot" did ditch an f35 into the south china sea and that was 100% her fault, but "mistakes" in engineering should be ironed out before they're nilly willy flying over civilian infrastructure and the pilot gets ejected over land and the jet f's off for 50 miles until it finally crashes into someone's yard. The faa is kinda stringent when it comes to flying. If I slapped some garbage together and it had a high failure rate I sure af wouldn't be able to fly it. But then again we can look at Boeing and see those jet liners are falling apart mid flight and the faa doesnt particularly seem to care cuz the tax payers will be stuck paying for it. It's not a "mistake" when there's a ton of videos out there of these jets doing the exact opposite of what they're suppose to do and that flying into the ground or water. It's more than a simple "mistake"
well there is a difference in helicopter and planes moreover you dont usually go and see a monkey climbing tree but you wont set your eyes off if a fish was doing that
@@ismailkitmane3719 It's simple as shit. A five year old could come up with the design. You just need the engineers to make it work without blowing up. That's why it takes *time* and we're seeing it just now and not fifty years ago.
Wouldn't be convincing because it's extremely loud, like all jets are. Genuine UFO's make no sound even when in close proximity only a slight humming noise is sometimes heard.
Interesting you should say that. In summer 1969, my family lived in Berkeley Missouri which is a few miles east of Lambert International airport-St. Louis. Lambert airport was the location of the Headquarters for McDonnell Douglas Aviation. Just days after the lunar landing of Apollo 11, my father was driving my sister and I on Lindbergh Ave. approaching Interstate 270/255 which is northwest of the airport. As we approached the highway overpass we saw something over the roadway. This area was not undeveloped like a farmer's field. It was primarily a business community with car dealerships and restaurants. Beyond the interchange on all sides was single family residential housing. It was of course not unusual to see aircraft considering the proximity to the airport, but this did not seem to be moving. And it was no helicopter. It was primarily white with orange painted highlights and it was floating essentially motionless. This being a summer day around 11 am, and clear blue skies, it hovered over the southeast cloverleaf of the interchange at about 200 feet. And it was LOUD. As we got closer to it my father began slowing down our car as we all looked at this thing, mouths open in amazement. We weren't the only ones either. It was a Saturday morning and traffic was very light, but other cars on all the various lanes and directions were slowing to have a look to the degrees that traffic came to a halt. My sister asked, "What is that? A UFO?" She was 4 years older than me, my being 5 years of age. I think my father's reply was along the lines of, "I dunno." We passed by it within several hundred feet at a snail's pace while it rotated slightly. Once we were about a quarter mile away it rose to a higher altitude and moved away. The discussion for the next ten minutes was obviously what it was, how it stayed in the air and where it came from. Considering the recent moon landing and related extraterrestrial life/UFO discussions on the news, my sister admitted to being afraid of whatever it was. When we returned home we told our mother and older brothers about it. Big mistake. Of course they assumed we were kidding. When our father confirmed what we saw, he also became the receiver of frowns and snickering from our brothers. My mother asked him if it was true, which he said it was, but even mom gave him a look of "Seriously?........" Eventually we learned it was better to not bring up the subject anymore for fear of mocking. Many years later, while visiting Schaeffer's Hobby Shop in south St. Louis, (I was probably in my early twenties) I was looking through the "In Action" series of Squadron aircraft soft back books when something caught my eye. On the back of one was an artist's rendition of the aircraft I my sister and father had seen many years prior. It was the "Harrier In Action" book. I was very familiar with Harriers and many different types of aircraft being a model kit builder almost exclusively of 1:48 scale. I had completely forgot about the incident but seeing artwork of the Harrier, reminded of it. I looked in the book for an explanation of it, and remembered that prototype military aircraft were painted white with orange highlights for higher visibility during flight testing. The reason the aircraft was over that road in 1969 I learned was that the US Marines were very interested in the AV-8 Harrier for its VTOL capabilities. McDonnell Douglas had been partnering with Hawker Siddley to purchase Harriers from the British. The aircraft floating over the highway was being tested, and scaring the shit out of my older sister. And setting her my father and I and probably numerous witnesses up for unwanted mockery from our family members when we told the tale.
@JujuOnTheBeat2 that’s because the thrust bounces onto the ground and shakes the ground creating more intense vibrations and even more noise it also requires A LOT of power for VTOL
right, i had to research its sound by watching this video because i saw one at a way closer distance than this camera man and it was silently hovering in a residential area just above street lights at night going into between two hills illegally by skunk works and i was the only witness. must be a prototype or a ufo disguised as an f35. at edwards afb area.
Acutally this is the worst price of shitty aircraft i ever seen. It wasted so much on the Defence Budget and now Congress keeps buying it. The navy still have difficulties with it's carrier landings as for maintain the aircraft is too expensive. The f14 Tomcat is the best and sexist aircraft i ever seen. (Lmao this is a joke, the f35 has it's pros and cons.)
@@theelephantintheroom69it melts asphalt which is why you find them doing stovl takeoffs (short takeoffs) using the vtol instead of straight up vertical takeoffs, so yeah i wouldnt want to be under it
@@zainjav ahahahha lol don t u think the f 35 is the best jet? If u think this its clear the amrrican propaganda reach u already sry dude but i don t talk with jerks.
@@BenitoakaDuce I never said anything about the f35. Look at all the other standards in military aviation that have come out of the United States, the f16 being one of many examples.
It's crazy how this technology has been a thing for more than 20 years yet many people haven't heard about it Edit: Please stop saying VTOL technology is 60 years old. I know. I get it, but I was referring to the F-35 being about 20+ years old
I think the biggest difference between the F35 and the Harrier is the lack of need for cooling water (I could be wrong, I just vaguely remember someone mentioning it) and the F35 having stealth capabilities like the F22 does.
Had they told the public, "You're gonna fucking love this thing, it's gonna float magically and shit, and take off straight up and down. Pretty badass shit." It wouldn't have been such a controversial development.
Yeah, that's the whole point of developing VTOL aircraft. Being able to land and takeoff from pretty much anywhere is a huge tactical advantage, it goes a long way towards nullifying the tactic of targeting one's airfields.
Agreed, the british were launching Harriers from container boats during the falklands war in the 70s, the argientines were wondering how they were getting fighter jets to the war after destroying the british main carrier!
Italy, for example, really benefits from VTOL jets because they don’t really have a lot of adequate runways. They loved the harrier, and when they have enough money they intend to buy the F-35B.
I can never understand people saying that the f35 and f22 are unnecessary... russia, china, and even Japan and India are developing 5th generation stealth fighters. Should we just not develop 5th generation stealth fighters as well? I admit, their development was horrendous and the costs are exorbitant. But this is because no one has made a 5th generation stealth fighter before, especially with vtol (LOL). It makes me laugh how some people think making the f22 and f35 should have been a piece of cake. The fact that the f22 is the only combat operations 5th generation stealth fighter to have even flown missions is a testament to the advantages of not falling behind in fighter technologies, and being a leader.
Joh1002mm hah fuck off, Russia made 3 5th generation fighters, Su47, Mig1.44 and Yak141 during 1990s, when USA didn't even develop F22 prototype , and now Russia has Su57, it gone late because of USSR collapse and economy crisis, it's all fine now and Russia will reply every American fighter by creating it's own new Russian equivalent the Yak141 designs were sold to Lockheed Martin and they made the JSF Programme which is now the F35, the Americans have copied the Russian tech and you little fuck giving us some history lessons? go learn yourself kid
I work on the ec130 a aircraft that is over 30 yrs olds and there is a ton of top secret capabilities I'm not allowed to know about unless it's needed for my job.The f35 is less than a decade old highly advanced and lockhead Martin contractors do most of the in depth maintenance.There is a ton of things we don't know about this aircraft.Unless you actually work on the aircraft your opinion is equal to nothing considering half the people on Don't even work on aircraft in general.
@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ How is a MiG 2 times better? It has a lot of different features, but like any plane there are trade offs. I’m personally excited to see what this jet can do.
@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ like, no, not really. They aren’t that much better. And frankly, I don’t think anyone who cares for their country in the world would want the Russian influence attached to the purchase. Note to people who like democracy
@@EternalShadow1667 lots of countries in Asia use russian tech. Turkey being a major example when it made orders for s400 units when US refused to let it purchase patriot systems.
All you F-35 haters sound just like the F-16 haters back in the day. Now everybody loves the "legendary" F-16. The F-35 will be exceptional at its job. You all will eat your words a decade from now so let me be the first to say "I told you so"...
Really? Saying the F-35 "will be exceptional" without any proof of performance or combat use isn't accurate, at all. The F-16 was a rather successful design, while the F-35 was developed strictly to become a cash cow for Lockheed and the MIC.
In simulated fights between the F-35 and the F-16 the F-16 had a win rate of almost 100%. Im sorry, but if the new, incredibly expensive Plane cant even beat the one it is supposed to replace you can not really talk about a "exceptional job"
@@marble25 so based on your previous comments .... F-35 max flight time is a minute ..... Well I m really proud of my old MiG s yeah it's synonymous to flying coffin and boutique plane but it can run for hours.
Yep, thats why they dont take off vertically with a full load, and/or weapons, always full standard take off, or short vertical take off, (saves gas) but i did see a scenario in an article once written by former miltary planner say in a contested area with no fob for aircraft, but air dominance is had they could use parking lots for short hops, and to take off climb out and meet a tanker, until a suitable fob can be made, that would be awesome, because lets be honest seeing an F-35 or future fighter complete a mission from a parking lot with no runway is just awesome to think about
MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Fewer built. They actually serve a purpose, as well. The F-35 can't carry enough bombs far enough to be a serious bomber, and there's no such thing as a dog fight any more.
The Harrier jumpjet vtol aircraft, an English invention/piece of engineering entered service with the Royal Airforce, on the 1st April 1969, some 44 years before the Lockheed plane.
@@kennyc9662 I'm not familiar with film. Shouldn't the van being in the foreground make it appear much larger in comparison to the plane in the background? Unless the plane really is huge. At 0:12, it really doesn't appear to be that big, but the van makes it look huge.
I remember reading about its development. I felt confident that it wouldn't work because, except for the Harrier, no VSTOL fighter aircraft worked very well. Even the Yak-38 was a bit of a lemon. Furthermore, the vertical fan seemed painful complex and displaced too much fuel. Boy, was I wrong!
+aviatorEngineer I have not seen vertical take off.. just vertical liftoff and hover... do you know of any clips on here that show the f35 taking forward flight after vertical liftoff? If you know of any would you be willing to copy n paste the url here pls? I am really curious.. there are a lot of clips on here but none that I have seen show actual forward takeoff into flight from a hovering state after vertical liftoff... thx frien~
+KMurdock1974 I think that is still impossiable because it needs speed to get the lift on the wings,when they would try to forward fly,aircraft would probably stall and crash.
This aircraft is being used at this time regularly. Awesome! I remember when it was first taking to the air…seemed so futuristic. Reminded me of the cartoon the Jetson’s!
I thought about designing a new type of helicopter that is more armored and has great reach, most likely an (german word) schwenkrotorhelikopter. But now i see an jet that takes of vertically. Case file closed.
F-35: "hey" F-18: "what?" F-35: "Y'know how you use a catapult to take off from a carrier?" F-18: "yeah, what about it?" F-35: "Well, what if you just did this?" *f l o a t*
Haters keep hatin' Truly one of the best aircraft technology wise and a marvel of engineering, thankfully the US goverment know better than to fall for internet's cancel culture and keep it in development and now serial production, i am for one thankful for its existense despite the negative comments and false facts being spreaded by dumb twitter """experts""", reformers and russian propaganda, stay strong USA
Idk the British did it in the 60s and it didn't add 10% to their total national debt lol. In fact it's the most expensive military project in human history. And it's worse than the harrier. Hold the praise just a bit.
@@pauld.b7129 Different planes fulfilling different roles, f35 is more advanced technologically than the harrier, but I'd like to hear what makes it worse.
The amount of energy required for landing and take-off in F-35Bs is insane compared to runway counterparts....however awesome I would love to see the consumption in both ...
the improved thrust/fly by wire help makes these much easier than Harriers were and safer. Harriers were harder to keep control, the F-35 almost does it all itself. Harrier was utterly amazing for its time, have to admit.
True the harrier was known to be tricky but they were handled by competant pilots during the 70s falklands war. Ironic no harriers were downed by enemies despite being heavily used by UK but the only losses were malfunction.
@@xenonspeaks7018 Thanks for ur help buddy! But now i know how to move it to forward direction. I got help from TH-cam because of that now i can fly Jet plane in San Andreas, I didn't knew this till 2018 or before.
They should have called round to Hawker Siddeley for a cup of tea and a chat. We had this shit sorted out 70 years ago. No computers, no simulation.. just British engineering prowess.
In order for F35s to take off vertically, do they require external fuel tanks or do they take up internal space that would otherwise be used for a payload?
Cool. Honestly never seen a real jet do that. Only in video games have i seen vertical takeoffs in jets. Though I'm sure that eventually that technology will lead to us being able to transport more jets on our carriers because it will eliminate the need for a runway.
+Faggy McFegit that's a lie/myth. There's an entire video debunking it by Dalek14 on TH-cam. Literally the only part shared is the three shamferred cylinders that allow the rear novel to rotate. It turns out this was a US design during the cold war that was worked on by Lockheed long before Yakolev used it. Lockheed simply bought test data off Yak for a design they already had. It's not even remotely copied.
![เปิดคำทำนาย นอสตราดามุส - บาบา วานก้า ปี 2025 คนทั่วโลกต้องเจออะไรบ้าง? | แฉ 11 ธ.ค. 67 [2/3] |GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xmTIKWJUMPM/mqdefault.jpg)
The amount of engineering that went into this is unbelievable
Just look how steady it is
Note how the pilot can drop the plane slowly for touch down, compare to AV-8B Harrier pilots that's required to turn down the engine quite significantly and slam the plane at the last one/two foot.
well its not that impressive compared to su57 flatspins.
thanks for telling me to look i hadn't noticed the video i was just listening to the sound
Blaise N'kufo Su57 is shit compared to F-35 lmao
@LOCKON And it failed lmao
So it was realistic after all how i started my toy planes as a kid
Konstanley Jerknov reverse card
Konstanley Jerknov th-cam.com/video/DksSPZTZES0/w-d-xo.html
This dude is just jealous he probably lives in a broken down house and has never been laid, only from his mother who probably regretted having him and thought about having an abortion
Konstanley Jerknov
Soviet Union*
Lol who's mad? I love my country :)
A fixed winged aircraft hovering is the most magnificent thing one can witness.
Yeah feels just like sci-fi
Where is any video demonstrating this "VTOL"s ability to transit into horizontal fly?
Oh yes. Look for ever, find no thing what so ever.
@@worldoftancraft either not developed enough or done before but not revealed due to it being classified. many things about these jets the public doesnt know, because enemies can take all that data and make counters for them, rendering all the advanced tech almost useless
@@itzbrezaa do you understand that VTOL without being able to transit to horizontal flight is a useless plane-vtol?
And it can, some videos show. Yet they aren't popular
Yes u're right, I only ever see osprey did that
Keyboard warriors: “the F-35 is bad”
The F-35 hovering outside their house:
They do seem to crash... a lot
29% turned out to be operational, and many many many models seem to just fizzle out somehow. Lockheed is a money grabbing corporation, the US government better get these contractors in check, this is of utmost importance.
@@Darakyoutane I've noticed a lot of the nato countries have issues with them as well. Watched a video of the British navy sending one into the ocean lmfao, you know though American acceptionalism at its best
@@jlo7770Apparently mistakes can happen sometimes
@@Rorywizz well it's a 100 million dollar mistake everytime one of these f35 decideds to act up. I will accept that that unqualified woman "fighter pilot" did ditch an f35 into the south china sea and that was 100% her fault, but "mistakes" in engineering should be ironed out before they're nilly willy flying over civilian infrastructure and the pilot gets ejected over land and the jet f's off for 50 miles until it finally crashes into someone's yard.
The faa is kinda stringent when it comes to flying. If I slapped some garbage together and it had a high failure rate I sure af wouldn't be able to fly it. But then again we can look at Boeing and see those jet liners are falling apart mid flight and the faa doesnt particularly seem to care cuz the tax payers will be stuck paying for it. It's not a "mistake" when there's a ton of videos out there of these jets doing the exact opposite of what they're suppose to do and that flying into the ground or water. It's more than a simple "mistake"
I remember taking off for the first time from Michael's house
michaels house? What game are you talking about?
@@smokecrash2147 GTA V
@@nityasingh3 But there isnt even a harrier V II in GTA V let alone a helipad or a suitable landing spot on michaels estate
@@smokecrash2147 ive added F-35 mod,
And the tennis court of Michael's house is perfect for vertical landing and takeoff
@@nityasingh3 ...
The computers onboard must be doing so many calcs per second to keep that thing level. Insane.
Not really or maybe it’s just evenly distributed propulsion keeping it naturally stable
@@Sanyu-Tumusiime Yeah bro,we are definitely going with your *maybe theory* when it comes to the f-35 Advanced sensors
@@ptbro3334 Yeah bro, you're not even from the country which makes them
@@Sanyu-Tumusiime yeah and neither of you have know what you're talking about so who cares
@@davidhasslehoff4379 i was an aerospace engineer
You just never get tired of watching an aircraft taking off vertically.
And I've been flying helicopters for over 12 years...
It just seems wrong, doesn't it? Like it's completely unnatural, yet it's hapoening
@@julians.2597 To me, it's not wrong in the sense it shouldn't happen, it just doesnt seem correct, it's more of a "It COULD do that?"
well there is a difference in helicopter and planes
moreover you dont usually go and see a monkey climbing tree but you wont set your eyes off if a fish was doing that
and to think this could have paid off my student debt!
@@LebronCCP well, I guess the US cares more about air defence than about student dept.
Reminds me of the time I never flew an f-35. Awesome!
Me too.
Mw moment
Reminds me of the time I did and yes very awesome!!! ⚡️ 🤘
Me too.
dude i fly them all the time! (in gta ;-;)
Me: wow technology is really advancing
Also me: oh, this video is seven years old
probably much older, they are just ready to show it to the public
@Franco Firewall VTOL TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 50 FUCKING YEARS WE ARE LIVING IN THE FUTURE
@@arenomusic STOP BEING SO AGGRESSIVE PLEASE!!
Meh, they designed it based on aircraft which was 30 year around (Sukhoi 27 and it's descendants, direct connection to engine design of F-35)
@@gr8cescale his name say music though
imagine how many alien Spaceship sightings this bad boy must have been responsible for
More like, how many alien crashes it took to come up with the technology.
Ismail Kitmane this ^
@@ismailkitmane3719 🤯🤯 burst my brain. Hmm that's a good one.
laughs in B2 Spirit
@@ismailkitmane3719 It's simple as shit. A five year old could come up with the design. You just need the engineers to make it work without blowing up. That's why it takes *time* and we're seeing it just now and not fifty years ago.
Now make it look like a ufo and fly it by an old camera convention.
Calthecool That would be fun
Wouldn't be convincing because it's extremely loud, like all jets are. Genuine UFO's make no sound even when in close proximity only a slight humming noise is sometimes heard.
@@FrankyPi uh oh, do you precisly know what a UFO is?
@@Tacticaviator7 Bob Lazar confirmed
Interesting you should say that.
In summer 1969, my family lived in Berkeley Missouri which is a few miles east of Lambert International airport-St. Louis.
Lambert airport was the location of the Headquarters for McDonnell Douglas Aviation.
Just days after the lunar landing of Apollo 11, my father was driving my sister and I on Lindbergh Ave. approaching Interstate 270/255 which is northwest of the airport.
As we approached the highway overpass we saw something over the roadway.
This area was not undeveloped like a farmer's field.
It was primarily a business community with car dealerships and restaurants. Beyond the interchange on all sides was single family residential housing.
It was of course not unusual to see aircraft considering the proximity to the airport, but this did not seem to be moving.
And it was no helicopter.
It was primarily white with orange painted highlights and it was floating essentially motionless.
This being a summer day around 11 am, and clear blue skies, it hovered over the southeast cloverleaf of the interchange at about 200 feet.
And it was LOUD.
As we got closer to it my father began slowing down our car as we all looked at this thing, mouths open in amazement.
We weren't the only ones either.
It was a Saturday morning and traffic was very light, but other cars on all the various lanes and directions were slowing to have a look to the degrees that traffic came to a halt.
My sister asked, "What is that? A UFO?" She was 4 years older than me, my being 5 years of age.
I think my father's reply was along the lines of, "I dunno."
We passed by it within several hundred feet at a snail's pace while it rotated slightly.
Once we were about a quarter mile away it rose to a higher altitude and moved away.
The discussion for the next ten minutes was obviously what it was, how it stayed in the air and where it came from.
Considering the recent moon landing and related extraterrestrial life/UFO discussions on the news, my sister admitted to being afraid of whatever it was.
When we returned home we told our mother and older brothers about it.
Big mistake.
Of course they assumed we were kidding.
When our father confirmed what we saw, he also became the receiver of frowns and snickering from our brothers.
My mother asked him if it was true, which he said it was, but even mom gave him a look of "Seriously?........"
Eventually we learned it was better to not bring up the subject anymore for fear of mocking.
Many years later, while visiting Schaeffer's Hobby Shop in south St. Louis, (I was probably in my early twenties) I was looking through the "In Action" series of Squadron aircraft soft back books
when something caught my eye.
On the back of one was an artist's rendition of the aircraft I my sister and father had seen many years prior.
It was the "Harrier In Action" book.
I was very familiar with Harriers and many different types of aircraft being a model kit builder almost exclusively of 1:48 scale.
I had completely forgot about the incident but seeing artwork of the Harrier, reminded of it.
I looked in the book for an explanation of it, and remembered that prototype military aircraft were painted white with orange highlights for higher visibility during flight testing.
The reason the aircraft was over that road in 1969 I learned was that the US Marines were very interested in the AV-8 Harrier for its VTOL capabilities.
McDonnell Douglas had been partnering with Hawker Siddley to purchase Harriers from the British.
The aircraft floating over the highway was being tested, and scaring the shit out of my older sister.
And setting her my father and I and probably numerous witnesses up for unwanted mockery from our family members when we told the tale.
Those things are honestly the coolest jets I've ever seen in real life. There super loud too
@JujuOnTheBeat2 that’s because the thrust bounces onto the ground and shakes the ground creating more intense vibrations and even more noise it also requires A LOT of power for VTOL
It’s also powered by the damn PW-F-135 engine, the most powerful engine fitted to a single engine fighter
right, i had to research its sound by watching this video because i saw one at a way closer distance than this camera man and it was silently hovering in a residential area just above street lights at night going into between two hills illegally by skunk works and i was the only witness. must be a prototype or a ufo disguised as an f35. at edwards afb area.
It's a beautiful piece of engineering.
Acutally this is the worst price of shitty aircraft i ever seen. It wasted so much on the Defence Budget and now Congress keeps buying it. The navy still have difficulties with it's carrier landings as for maintain the aircraft is too expensive. The f14 Tomcat is the best and sexist aircraft i ever seen. (Lmao this is a joke, the f35 has it's pros and cons.)
If you like set squares yes...Concorde was a beautiful piece of engineering. This looks like a ruler and a set square made love no thanks.
@@codyhernandez791 this plane has serious stalling issues
How much fuel it Burns?
Hi trust engine needs hi fuel to fly small wings aircraft..
Unreal engineering definitely. That vertical take off is so useful in some situations. Planes are just fascinating machines.
Incoming Aviation Engineers from the University of TH-cam comment sections tells you how bad the F-35 is
copywriter hahaha
But it's really not that good lol
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial rocket scientist spotted.
@@mayankmishra1186 yes thanks to my 2 months of youtube studying I am now an expert on the field
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial i never knew lockheed martin is running such educational programs on youtube.
1960s: Dreams of a VTOL supersonic fighter
2010s: Complains about a VTOL supersonic fighter
Dreams? Over in the UK we had VTOL in the 60s 😂
@@urbanmidnight1 please read carefully, I said VTOL SUPERSONIC fighter :) The Harrier jet is not supersonic, as impressive as it is!
Gaand Faad News hahahah
Search: YAK-141
Phạm Thọ only 4 built used for tests
The amount of energy required to keep that aircraft hovering must be unbelievable
It needs to lift the equivalent weight in air to itself to stay hovering. Insane to imagine standing underneath the engine or fan
@@theelephantintheroom69it melts asphalt which is why you find them doing stovl takeoffs (short takeoffs) using the vtol instead of straight up vertical takeoffs, so yeah i wouldnt want to be under it
they copied the design from GTA San Andreas
MashedPixels r/woooosh
@@harrapanman621 boards?
@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 mai bhi 10th mai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
@@carcinogenicthalidomide3057 physics kaisa raha?
@@jaibhardwaj4886 to padhai kar esab mat dek
0:40
F-35B: I have to go now. My planet needs me.
Planet America
And than get killed by a random ww2 yak 9 cuz usa planes sucks
@@BenitoakaDuce You’re either willfully ignorant or extremely uninformed
@@zainjav ahahahha lol don t u think the f 35 is the best jet? If u think this its clear the amrrican propaganda reach u already sry dude but i don t talk with jerks.
@@BenitoakaDuce I never said anything about the f35. Look at all the other standards in military aviation that have come out of the United States, the f16 being one of many examples.
World: you can be whatever you want
F-35b: i want to be a helicopter!
World: wait what?
Not the first or second time a plane said this
😂😂😂😂😂
@@indianjudge5860 no I hate that.
Funny. Laughed.
More like
F35b:I want to be a stealth Harrier!
It's crazy how this technology has been a thing for more than 20 years yet many people haven't heard about it
Edit: Please stop saying VTOL technology is 60 years old. I know. I get it, but I was referring to the F-35 being about 20+ years old
Harrier: allow me to introduce myself
I think the biggest difference between the F35 and the Harrier is the lack of need for cooling water (I could be wrong, I just vaguely remember someone mentioning it) and the F35 having stealth capabilities like the F22 does.
@@samrodriguez3311 ikr? VTOL aircraft have existed for a long time yet some people see this video and think its new
Star Wars in real life. Looks just like an x wing taking off lol. Or should I say the x wing looks like the f-35 lolz
It's 400 year old technology. Isaac Newton gave f=ma. Just didn't know how to engineer it.
Helicopters: Am I joke to you????
F35 : Am I Helicopter to you???
😑
Boring joke...
This is the best joke I've for heard for so long
@@bodhisattwamondal4969 No.
@@bodhisattwamondal4969 Umm... no
Boeing joke
...
Had they told the public, "You're gonna fucking love this thing, it's gonna float magically and shit, and take off straight up and down. Pretty badass shit." It wouldn't have been such a controversial development.
exactly!
Thing is, it won't. It can only VTOL with half a fuel load and no weapons, so.
It is marketed as a STOVL. The only people who call it a VTOL are probably uneducated in the fact it can't do a proper vertical takeoff.
+Karuiko It was meant to be VTOL but it isn't. So they changed how they market it. It's meant to replace the harrier
Protoman lol
“JUMPJET”
GTA sa
A man of culture i see
Ahhahaa
Best comment! It brings back so many memories.
Actually the hydra jet from gta sa and gta v are taking from a av-8b harrier jet, not the f35b
You don't actually need a runway to take off or land this machine. This is awesome
wahahahah
Yeah, that's the whole point of developing VTOL aircraft. Being able to land and takeoff from pretty much anywhere is a huge tactical advantage, it goes a long way towards nullifying the tactic of targeting one's airfields.
Agreed, the british were launching Harriers from container boats during the falklands war in the 70s, the argientines were wondering how they were getting fighter jets to the war after destroying the british main carrier!
Urm the Argentines never sank a carrier?
Italy, for example, really benefits from VTOL jets because they don’t really have a lot of adequate runways. They loved the harrier, and when they have enough money they intend to buy the F-35B.
0:44
thats how stuff use to fly in 90's movies.
Harriers been made awhile ago tho
Some planes in that ear already have VTOL
Go and see yak 41 m made by ussr . Fir pata chaelga f35 kaha se aya hai
Harry Tasker cleaning up the 20th floor.
@@yashdeepkeer6937 yes i agree , par kuch ussr ki planes bhi usa ka copy hai
I can never understand people saying that the f35 and f22 are unnecessary... russia, china, and even Japan and India are developing 5th generation stealth fighters. Should we just not develop 5th generation stealth fighters as well? I admit, their development was horrendous and the costs are exorbitant. But this is because no one has made a 5th generation stealth fighter before, especially with vtol (LOL). It makes me laugh how some people think making the f22 and f35 should have been a piece of cake. The fact that the f22 is the only combat operations 5th generation stealth fighter to have even flown missions is a testament to the advantages of not falling behind in fighter technologies, and being a leader.
Joh1002mm hah fuck off, Russia made 3 5th generation fighters, Su47, Mig1.44 and Yak141 during 1990s, when USA didn't even develop F22 prototype , and now Russia has Su57, it gone late because of USSR collapse and economy crisis, it's all fine now and Russia will reply every American fighter by creating it's own new Russian equivalent
the Yak141 designs were sold to Lockheed Martin and they made the JSF Programme which is now the F35, the Americans have copied the Russian tech and you little fuck giving us some history lessons? go learn yourself kid
I work on the ec130 a aircraft that is over 30 yrs olds and there is a ton of top secret capabilities I'm not allowed to know about unless it's needed for my job.The f35 is less than a decade old highly advanced and lockhead Martin contractors do most of the in depth maintenance.There is a ton of things we don't know about this aircraft.Unless you actually work on the aircraft your opinion is equal to nothing considering half the people on Don't even work on aircraft in general.
Sariel Reigns Сариэль Царствует su57 production was just cancelled dummy. finally realized how behind the f35 they really are.
Joh1002mm stop acting like a nerd no one likes it
Know the difference between 4.5 and full on 5th gen dumbfuck. @@iii5169
Thanks for showing me in my recommendations after *6 years*
Now it's 7
Ya 7 for me too
Hello Dr. Sehgal...😂😂
@@shivankursharma7999 haan bhai bol
I went to the DC air show a few years ago and they were flying these…. Freaking unbelievable
0:41 felling sad for the patch of runway.
@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ How is a MiG 2 times better? It has a lot of different features, but like any plane there are trade offs. I’m personally excited to see what this jet can do.
@ОСЬМИНОГ - ШОУ like, no, not really. They aren’t that much better. And frankly, I don’t think anyone who cares for their country in the world would want the Russian influence attached to the purchase. Note to people who like democracy
@@EternalShadow1667 lots of countries in Asia use russian tech. Turkey being a major example when it made orders for s400 units when US refused to let it purchase patriot systems.
2012: Helipad on the skyscrapers
2020: F35Bpad on the skyscrapers
GTA 5 Online basically.
@Indian judge Please stop copying and pasting that piece of shit joke on any comment involving a helicopter.
Unfortunately its Corona time
@@Ghakimx P-996 Lazer pad (Or hydra)
1970: First in the world VTOL aircraft - Yak-38, made in USSR. 😂
All you F-35 haters sound just like the F-16 haters back in the day. Now everybody loves the "legendary" F-16. The F-35 will be exceptional at its job. You all will eat your words a decade from now so let me be the first to say "I told you so"...
decade
Really? Saying the F-35 "will be exceptional" without any proof of performance or combat use isn't accurate, at all. The F-16 was a rather successful design, while the F-35 was developed strictly to become a cash cow for Lockheed and the MIC.
Ha,ha, ha hilarious humour. What words will we eat? The opposite will be true in your old age you will eat your words.
FrakU2 For now, enjoy having zero government support to its citizens since all of the money is going in this garbage plane!
In simulated fights between the F-35 and the F-16 the F-16 had a win rate of almost 100%. Im sorry, but if the new, incredibly expensive Plane cant even beat the one it is supposed to replace you can not really talk about a "exceptional job"
Anyone here in 2024?
Edit: thanks for all the likes
Yep
Yeah a TikTok came up about jets and I got curious and here I am
Nope
Yes
Yep
F-35 in 2013: Did Vertical Takeoff
Me in 2020: Still can't Takeoff
@Hunter Hebert well, to be honest, neither am I and probably nor he is.
@Joe. Biden have you done real research on the f-35?
@Joe. Biden well hey it takes time to make a good aircraft
@Joe. Biden you forgot?
You will, dw😊
*Nothing*
*keep scrolling down...*
Fuck you bitch you made my day😂😂😂😂😂😂
BaiKO 😶😂
Okay
BaiKO lol
BEST. COMMENT. EVER.
Imagine how much fuel that takes to do...
probably close to a ton every minute.
200 metric ton per second
Edit : understand sarcasm
it's not small. has a maximum takeoff weight of 27 tons. about 9 tons being the fuel. by close to a ton I meant several hundred kilograms.
@@marble25 so based on your previous comments .... F-35 max flight time is a minute ..... Well I m really proud of my old MiG s yeah it's synonymous to flying coffin and boutique plane but it can run for hours.
Yep, thats why they dont take off vertically with a full load, and/or weapons, always full standard take off, or short vertical take off, (saves gas) but i did see a scenario in an article once written by former miltary planner say in a contested area with no fob for aircraft, but air dominance is had they could use parking lots for short hops, and to take off climb out and meet a tanker, until a suitable fob can be made, that would be awesome, because lets be honest seeing an F-35 or future fighter complete a mission from a parking lot with no runway is just awesome to think about
God that's so fucking cool. Even as a kid to this day the feeling of watching a vertical take off and landing is of amazement.
A masterpiece of engineering... Good job, Lockheed Martin...
Powered by Pratt & Whitney
The lift system that allows the aircraft to fly verically is a Rolls Royce development.
@@raymondchiu7582 both the swivel nozzle and lift fan is Rolls Royce…
@georgeqzzy1468 nope, Google who makes the engine, the F135 engine. Pratt
@IHeighway yes, among numerous others...
1:32
Car: alright imma head out.
😂😂😂
Lmao
it looks like its photoshopped lol
It’s crazy how small that van looks comparatively and it is in the foreground.
And there it is. the most expensive thing in the history of things.
+Docktor Jim Not even close...
+Docktor Jim B2 bomber is more expensive than an f-35
MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Fewer built. They actually serve a purpose, as well. The F-35 can't carry enough bombs far enough to be a serious bomber, and there's no such thing as a dog fight any more.
Docktor Jim I was just answering your question "the most expensive thing"
MEK'N'ISM BEATZ Well, as a program, the F35 costs a lot more. More units, each of them not particularly useful.
OH, MAN! WHAT AN IMPRESSIVE PIECE OF AMERICAN ENGINEERING AT 1:31 !
Edit: how does no one realize that I was talking about the van as a joke?
The Harrier jumpjet vtol aircraft, an English invention/piece of engineering entered service with the Royal Airforce, on the 1st April 1969, some 44 years before the Lockheed plane.
@@stephendorrington8962You didn't catch onto the joke about the random van driving by.
We’re getting closer to TIE Fighters and X-wings
And lightsabers, next time you look outside there might be a xyston class Star destroyer outside waiting to blow up earth
Yes, gundam will be there too
Lana 2000 ?
@@crystal2000x stupitest? Would you like to try again?
@@ef-5tornado495 to get a “real life lightsaber” we would need an insane power source to work as the kyber crystal
Kinda cool seeing the thrusters vectoring in action
1:33 I did NOT realize the size of the plane before seeing that car wow
I did not realize the size of the car before seeing that plane wow
there was a man at 0:12
@@geniusmarcsays2434 there is a man in the plane
You do realize that van is in the foreground right?
@@kennyc9662 I'm not familiar with film. Shouldn't the van being in the foreground make it appear much larger in comparison to the plane in the background? Unless the plane really is huge.
At 0:12, it really doesn't appear to be that big, but the van makes it look huge.
I remember reading about its development. I felt confident that it wouldn't work because, except for the Harrier, no VSTOL fighter aircraft worked very well. Even the Yak-38 was a bit of a lemon. Furthermore, the vertical fan seemed painful complex and displaced too much fuel. Boy, was I wrong!
0:31 Me when I realise I have to do things
What do you mean doge please tell me I'm literally shaking rn
Are u f 35?
Nothing specific just T H I N G S
@@proplayer-sc8xt LOL
So you just get high
Say what you will about VTOL, I think it's pretty nifty.
+aviatorEngineer I have not seen vertical take off.. just vertical liftoff and hover... do you know of any clips on here that show the f35 taking forward flight after vertical liftoff? If you know of any would you be willing to copy n paste the url here pls? I am really curious.. there are a lot of clips on here but none that I have seen show actual forward takeoff into flight from a hovering state after vertical liftoff... thx frien~
+KMurdock1974 I think that is still impossiable because it needs speed to get the lift on the wings,when they would try to forward fly,aircraft would probably stall and crash.
+Kico Horvat not nessesarily, look at the second engine stage, it probably a gradual shift to forward flight to maintain Vtol
+!〈VihurahDaGamer〉! I know,but I have yet to see IT going forward after VT
I haven't found any such video, but I tried it in Flight Simulator, and it was able to transition from vertical to horizontal flight fine.
you did a great job on creating this masterpiece
you better take time to admire it because he was already deadborn
thanks
I had to replay it multiple times to re-experience the amazement. They even added a "Most replayed" section (nicely done).
"float like a butterfly
Sting like a bee"
Applies well on this plane
lol exactly
A bee dies when stinging what do you mean by that
@sigma_frenchie4075 Muhammed Ali
I saw an amazing Herrier demo in '78. Most likely one of the first AV-8's.
Lockheed Martin, "What should we make next?"
???....," An Amphibious Fighter Aircraft."
@@beastman1927 which aircraft?
@@boingobadger9846 This
Lockheed is much more like, "Who should we bribe next?"
This aircraft is being used at this time regularly. Awesome! I remember when it was first taking to the air…seemed so futuristic. Reminded me of the cartoon the Jetson’s!
JUMPJET and pressing Numericals for vertical take off, CJ did long ago
that was sea harrier old vtol jet!
I thought about designing a new type of helicopter that is more armored and has great reach, most likely an (german word) schwenkrotorhelikopter.
But now i see an jet that takes of vertically. Case file closed.
You mean an attack helicopter?
“Hey Doc you might wanna back up we don’t have enough room to take off”
“Runway? Where we’re going we don’t need runway”
Legendary comment, gotta love Back to the future
F-35: "hey"
F-18: "what?"
F-35: "Y'know how you use a catapult to take off from a carrier?"
F-18: "yeah, what about it?"
F-35: "Well, what if you just did this?" *f l o a t*
Me:
Do the cheat get the plane
Fly to the casino
Play video poker
Do the cheat again
Fly and crash in to desert
Vertical is the best way to take off
Gas: Hold my bill
Aviation fuel*
Love this plane. To be able to stop on a dime, i reckon this is the best F35
Adult with no imagination: planes don’t takeoff like that, silly kid!
Future engineer: bet!
1:01 how everyone actually gonna leave area 51
The car at 1:33 how everyone actually left Area 51
Al T underrated
Even in 2019 this is BADASS
So it can take off vertically.
Neat!
No it cant, practically
Haters keep hatin'
Truly one of the best aircraft technology wise and a marvel of engineering, thankfully the US goverment know better than to fall for internet's cancel culture and keep it in development and now serial production, i am for one thankful for its existense despite the negative comments and false facts being spreaded by dumb twitter """experts""", reformers and russian propaganda, stay strong USA
I saw this jet at an airshow once and it was surprisingly a lot quieter than most of the other jets
Man engineers are the most under appreciated people on this planet
Idk the British did it in the 60s and it didn't add 10% to their total national debt lol. In fact it's the most expensive military project in human history. And it's worse than the harrier. Hold the praise just a bit.
@@pauld.b7129 Different planes fulfilling different roles, f35 is more advanced technologically than the harrier, but I'd like to hear what makes it worse.
The amount of energy required for landing and take-off in F-35Bs is insane compared to runway counterparts....however awesome I would love to see the consumption in both ...
High bypass ratio gives it a very good fuel efficiency without acterburner
Your work is unmatched my anyone who tries to copy you and I love the way you keep advancing every day
0:44 **harry potter theme intensifies**
AJHHAHDFGHDAFHDFGHADFHADFGHDFHDGF
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH
@@vaxton r/hadastroke
HAGAGSHAHHSHSHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHSGAGSHJDIXHWHSIZUSBWUHAHAHAHAHHAHAVWVW DDVJ2IJE8EDJBWHAHAHAHHAGAH
Susssosഅംഒഒഞൊഝനൊചഝഠഥങഛഥശചഥ
This is beautiful. Thank you Lockheed.
the improved thrust/fly by wire help makes these much easier than Harriers were and safer. Harriers were harder to keep control, the F-35 almost does it all itself. Harrier was utterly amazing for its time, have to admit.
True the harrier was known to be tricky but they were handled by competant pilots during the 70s falklands war. Ironic no harriers were downed by enemies despite being heavily used by UK but the only losses were malfunction.
Most Advanced High Technology Spotted Real This Time 🔥🔥🔥
"Sometimes, the jet forgets how to plane, This is because it's a schizophrenic and can take off vertically like a helicopter"
-Fearjames
Hats off to the engineers who built this marvelous flying machine. Bravo
All fine until the AA camping in spawn sees you
War Thunder?
Seth Jansson bf4
@@captain_squiddy I had a feeling, but same difference.
I tried flying F35 vertical in BF4. Accidentally crashed to a tree going backwards.
"What do you think he's listening to?"
"Probably heavy metal or hard rock"
honestly, had it with tryhards like this, ruined gta
Bruh just research explosive rounds
That's true but it's random 🤣 not everyone has it like you and me
Nah it didn't, it didn't break the meta atleast, unlike the mk2
Me: hahaha nice
Play gta sa
helicopter❌
Fighter jet❌
HELIJET💀💀💀
F35 seems like to be behaving like a helicopter. Really it is wonderful to see landing as well as take offs.
@petnzme01 It can...
VTOL planes remain the coolest thing since learning about them as a kid watching true lies in 94
I'm proud to say I work supporting these birds!
friend: no cheats this time, ok?
also him 1 millisecond after death:
I remember taking off from Carl Johnson's house in 2006
That was harrier 🤣
I watch this every now and again and it still amazes me, good ish lockheed.
Belíssima aeronave!
Breaking news, planes are now sentient and are gaining schizophrenia to think they are helicopters
This jet simply identifies as an attack helicopter
Outstanding machine .Outstanding aviators.The outcome is unexceptionable air superiority.Hats off
0:40 *insert NES Duck Tales “Moon Theme” here*
Pilot -* initiates vertical takeoff*
F35's jet engine thruster- alright imma head down
0:48 sounds like the plane is screaming
If you could levitate straight up in the air you'd be screaming too.
A plane that can do what this plane is capable of doing is worth every penny.
@@LPyourplay The Harrier doesn't compare to the F-35.
The way it just lifted up like a UFO.
Keep it up, Lockheed!
Respect to its engineers and designers. Marvellous aircraft
It cant even pull a 9g turn and its gonna cost about 2 trillion dollars in total . . . so no, fuck the designers and fuck lockhead
@@NymbusCumulo928 it's also a 5th gen VTOL multirole stealth fighter that costs under $100m per unit.
LMAO go check the fact that lockheed stole the project from russians (YAK 141)
@@abhinavpandey6261 the russians stole the idea for aircraft from the wright brothers
I actualy showed my class this vid proudly when i was 10 my presentation went about jets
This video remembered me about GTA San Adreas Jet plane when i didn't knew it how to make it fly and move it forward direction
Hydra
@@r.jguerra5526 yeah got it thnx dude
I always liked the way you would just push the right analog forward (san andreas) rather than pressing Right on d-Pad like gta5
Just use number keys 2 and 8 to control direction of thrust
@@xenonspeaks7018 Thanks for ur help buddy! But now i know how to move it to forward direction. I got help from TH-cam because of that now i can fly Jet plane in San Andreas, I didn't knew this till 2018 or before.
It is much more complex than it looks. Many many flips and flops during computer simulation during design. Amazing engineering.
They should have called round to Hawker Siddeley for a cup of tea and a chat. We had this shit sorted out 70 years ago. No computers, no simulation.. just British engineering prowess.
Could this jet take off vertically and then go into fly mode and refuel mid air?
pretty sure both are included capabilities.google youtube Farnborough Airshow you should see both refuel and flight mode change videos.
yes I just watched one do it over newbury Berkshire 2 days ago. Hercules.
short take off only. those vertical take off are in air show only, cuz the plane doesnt need to carry payload and more than an hour of fuel.
Well could the F35s have a payload but just enough fuel to get them off the ground and then be refuelled mid air?
In order for F35s to take off vertically, do they require external fuel tanks or do they take up internal space that would otherwise be used for a payload?
We certainly have come a long way, God bless our military, ❤️🇺🇸
Cool. Honestly never seen a real jet do that. Only in video games have i seen vertical takeoffs in jets. Though I'm sure that eventually that technology will lead to us being able to transport more jets on our carriers because it will eliminate the need for a runway.
The British designed Harrie has been doing that for decades.
Harrier? yak 38? yak 141? XV-5? btw the f35's design was "copied" (bought) from the soviet union's 141
+Faggy McFegit that's a lie/myth. There's an entire video debunking it by Dalek14 on TH-cam. Literally the only part shared is the three shamferred cylinders that allow the rear novel to rotate. It turns out this was a US design during the cold war that was worked on by Lockheed long before Yakolev used it. Lockheed simply bought test data off Yak for a design they already had. It's not even remotely copied.
ThePeople'sPanzer
i stand corrected
Wealthy Pepsi Brite were part of a Lockheed Martin the team, not the designer.
That one guy driving by: That's cool and historic but I gotta office to catch.