Had a chance to see one of these in person. Simply amazing! Well done to all those involved who did the hard work to make this a reality. Well done indeed.
Whats even more impressive is the McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier could vertical take off/ land waaay before the F35 back in the late 70s/ early 80s. They just perfected V-STOL for the F35 and incorporated advenced weaponry and stealth technology.
I like only F35A Conventional. At school I learned that any component for airplanes has to be designed to reduce weight as much as possibile, and here you are putting a huge vertical fan + this would require to have a very long and heavy transmission shaft from the turbine... not forgetting that if it is designed to support troopos it has to do with high speed, low load and short range due to the small swing span and wings design...... don't know but sincerly is out of my understanding. For sure in terms of engineering it is a masterpiece.
I have spent many hours studying this aircraft and this is the best video I have ever seen about f35 VTOL. Absolutely incredible explanation lol let's just hope the Chinese don't find this vid lol.
Give another 20 years and China wouldn't be interested looking at US techs. Some of their missiles/fighter jet/space satellites technology already surpass the US. Civilizations always learned/copy from each other through out history.
@@scarpien the russians bought the blueprints for the yak-141 from an American engineer that got rejected by the US government bruh, trying to imply they stole the design is just stupid
Funny thing, the main idea comes from Soviet designers, which invent the first airplane with vertical take - up and landing system. Yak-38, and YaK-139
Yeah yeah you Russian invented everything including humans, aliens and communism . Yet you can’t compete with US in technology that’s why you are watching F35 videos 😂
No it didn't. The Russians were far from first to build a V/stol aircraft the Yak was designed well after the Harriet first flew. And the Yak 38, and 141 used separate dedicated lift engines for vertical flight. The F-35 B only uses 1 engine for all it's power. The U.S., great Britain, France, and Germany had vertical takeoff prototypes long before Russia did. Their first V/STOL air craft was a Mig-21 varient that used lift only engines.
the basic F35A already is a nightmare as far as maintenance and reliability, can't imagine how the VSTOL version, operating off carriers in a hostile environment is going to fare from that perspective. They should have stuck with the much simpler Harrier design and built a stealth version of that sturdy plane.
Когда все пересядут на электросамокаты и забудут про велосипеды, американцы наснимают видео какю крутую они штуку придумали с двумя педалями на которой ездить можно сидя, и будут в переди планеты всей!) Главное что бы память у лохов была по короче.
the fact that this plane can be carried to anywhere in the world with a small ship or even submarine, taken out to the deck, take off and strike, is pretty amazing. It de-centralizes the carrier's duty and makes it much harder for the enemy to predict.
@@UnknownUser.ar1 Not really, the F-35 has some of if not the best stealth capabilities ever created. and in air to air combat the F35 will know where hostiles are before they even see it
What are the set of doors behind the life fan? Looks like it takes in air for the engine in VTOL mode, but why can't the regular engine inlets pull in air?
50 year old Gas turbine in dual Configuration with two vector nozzle, ya that's for sure. The only thing fancy is The Pilots Cyber great, Cyber dynamic Profile and Composits and even that is mostly carbon Composits. If this is plasma tech I mean microwave warp coils embedded in the body of the entire airframe with fusion drive, built into the engine for Supplying the power to the coils during critical Mach speed, then it's 1 T worth.
Developed energy from magnets Stabilize the system With the gravity of the world Magnets of the same polarity can be plugged into each other to act as a mechanism to rise and fall on an object.
Fun fact: There was no requirement for the F-35 to be able to do vertical takeoffs, just vertical landings. Because of that it is a STOVL aircraft rather than VTOL.
From 2:00 you can see the illustration of what you need to know. Its rear exhaust nozzle is adjustable so the pilot can control the nozzle's angle then it can fly in different mode simultaneously
@@tuboprochannel8526 You're welcome. I see that you must have done a lot of research and editing in this video. I think you deserve 100k subscribers. I can't believe there are people out there that make stupid videos and they have more subs then you, honestly those people don't deserve any subscribers.
i think after gaIning enough altitude and speed for enough lift to glide, they can reduce the engine thrust or switch it off , rotate it back and switch on to go forward....
@@klmnopq they will only have a vertical takeoff in very extreme situations or special operations, 99% of the time they will just have short takeoffs, when the plane will be fully loaded with fuel. Vertical landing is easier when the fuel is used up and the plane lighter.
The video omits the STO/short takeoff. I saw that on another video. That seems safer and more fuel efficient that VTO. The video omits the transitions to and from vertical mode; the most difficult operations. Is this variant operational?
the Empty weight of F-35B is 32,472 lb (14,729 kg), and Powerplant is 28,000 lbf (125 kN) thrust dry, 43,000 lbf (191 kN) with afterburner. That means, F-35B can take maximal 4000kg fuel and bomb if it start vertikale. AV8B can take same fuel and bomb if it start vertikale. And AV8B can fly quickly than F-35B.
the AV8B is subsonic, the F-35 is supersonic, the AV8B cannot fly quicker than the F-35 is that what you were trying to say. AV8B Top speed: 663mph F35B Top speed: 1228mph
@@xavierrodriguez2463 AV-8B empty weight is 13,968 lb (6,340 kg)， Powerplant is 23,500 lbf (105 kN) thrust. It is 16.56N/kg. And F-35B is 12.97N/kg. F-35B is not supersonic.
@@xavierrodriguez2463 the F35 flying near its top speed of around Mach 1.6 could result in damage to its stealth coating, which would require a lot of down time and high repair costs. The F35 and F22 are the most maintenance heavy jet fighters ever built, with the lowest percentage of combat readiness, below 50%. That's the downside of this program. The F35B is likely the worst variant from this perspective, a lot of moving parts...
And 1 Trillion development in the F35 Programme for this! from a Cyber Standpoint this is entry level bird. If this bird can punch Hyper-sonic like a Starfighter then it's fine, if not i would see it's quite a lot of money kind of wasted but not completely. I mean you can build Half of City square with that kind of Money
I think the Harrier jump jet was a better design in the take off apartment, as it could transition to normal flight. The F35 cannot do that. Thus not really a full take off, as it didn't transition to horizontal flight. As far as I'm aware, the F35 simply cannot take off vertically and transition to flight. Some might claim that to be a significant failing in the design.
But it can transition to normal flight. The Aircraft was designed for "short take offs" but if is isnt weighted down by a full load of fuel and munitions..it most certainly can vertically lift off the ground AND transition to normal flight.
Hopefully they can improve the engine power. I still prefer the ducted fan design of the Harrier. If they could redesign the Harrier for supersonic flight, it could make a good addition to the range of options for allied forces.
Sure man, but with that logic, why the heck do you copy me and you comment on youtube... Oh wait.. Am I doing it? The thing is that yak 141 failed, and it was such an old project, they could not copy that much with how to plane looks like now (f-35).
@@myusername3689 Their layouts are different, just watch their disassembly; only appearance is similar. The principle of gas system is common for lots of automatic weapons.
Keeping dreaming buddy. This here is good ol’ American made might. From blueprint to final product. This superiority is the outcome of something we like to call democracy. This work is the result of the minds that were born into freedom with no shackles to pin them down.
1:00 I don't believe this aircraft can take off vertically, and transition to horizontal flight. There are no videos that show this capability. It can go from horizontal, too hover, to landing, but not from takeoff, to hover, to level flight. It is not VTOL (Vertical Take Off/and Landing), it's STVL (Short Takeoff/Vertical Landing).
Don’t believe what are you seeing. The truth: the fuel tank is nearly empty for the vertical take off of F35. As soon as the aircraft is in the air, it needs refueling asp.
How much pressure is needed to lift it up? Where do this tremendous ait pressure comes from?There is an opening above the cockpit... Is it a passage of air input?....
Dikey iniş kalkış özellikte olan bu uçağı amerika vermiyorsa türk mühendisleri böyle özellikte olan bir uçak modeli yapmali tfx yanına alamıyorsak kopyalamak gerekir
![เปิดคำทำนาย นอสตราดามุส - บาบา วานก้า ปี 2025 คนทั่วโลกต้องเจออะไรบ้าง? | แฉ 11 ธ.ค. 67 [2/3] |GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xmTIKWJUMPM/mqdefault.jpg)
![How F-35 Works? | F-35 [B] VTOL Animation | Three Bearing Swivel Nozzle and Lift System Animation.](/img/n.gif)
Always wondered how they maintain moment equillibrium while hovering. This gave me answer! Thanks a lot!
Thank for your watching , bro.
same principle for quadcopters..just adding a mixer output for the rear nozzle positions
British Technology from the 60s and 70s.
Hatts off to engineers..who build this amazing plane...
its a jet, planes use propellers
@@bilizard6218 not propeller, planes uses jet engine
Copied of a Russian plane
@@michaelenright1089 не як 38 немного отличается
@@ИгорьЛюбарский-ж2ь як 141 вроде
Had a chance to see one of these in person. Simply amazing! Well done to all those involved who did the hard work to make this a reality. Well done indeed.
Excellently explained. Thank you ! ! !
Thank for your watching. Enjoy your day bro.
What a marvel of engineering. Found glimpse of future in it. Great
Thank you for spending your precious time making this content available online
Thank for your watching. Bro.
Brilliant design and great piece of engineering!!
Absolutely. Thank for your watching, bro.
The F 35 is scrap and they bought the propulsion system from the Russian company Yakowlew (Yak 141). So hats off to Yakovlev engineers!
@CarFreak are you sure lol? Only 60 years after the harrier? Well done usa millitary industrial complex.
Helicopter : am i joke to you?
F 35 : am I helicopter to you?
literally non sense attempt
Time power
Shit comment
Airfield : left the chat.
Ever heard about harrier?
What an engineering masterpiece !!
Whats even more impressive is the McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier could vertical take off/ land waaay before the F35 back in the late 70s/ early 80s.
They just perfected V-STOL for the F35 and incorporated advenced weaponry and stealth technology.
@@808G8GT Oh that's interesting.
this is SU57 food, nothing special
@@808G8GT як 141
you should thanks for Soviet Union because they invented this !
I work at LM and the first time I saw this in person was life changing. Such an amazing aircraft.
Easy to understand! That's amazing!
I like only F35A Conventional. At school I learned that any component for airplanes has to be designed to reduce weight as much as possibile, and here you are putting a huge vertical fan + this would require to have a very long and heavy transmission shaft from the turbine... not forgetting that if it is designed to support troopos it has to do with high speed, low load and short range due to the small swing span and wings design...... don't know but sincerly is out of my understanding. For sure in terms of engineering it is a masterpiece.
The f-35b is used in places such as a helipad and f-35a is better but won’t takeoff there😊
I have spent many hours studying this aircraft and this is the best video I have ever seen about f35 VTOL.
Absolutely incredible explanation lol let's just hope the Chinese don't find this vid lol.
Why? It’s only common knowledge
@@MaticTheProto IKR. Didn't the US 'find' and incorporated the best of Yak-141 and Harrier's specs into the design of the F35?
@@scarpien yes
Give another 20 years and China wouldn't be interested looking at US techs. Some of their missiles/fighter jet/space satellites technology already surpass the US. Civilizations always learned/copy from each other through out history.
@@scarpien the russians bought the blueprints for the yak-141 from an American engineer that got rejected by the US government bruh, trying to imply they stole the design is just stupid
plane:
literally any other plane:
F-35 Lightning II: *laughs in vertical takeoff*
F35 vertical landing is amazing, I really like it
Just wish they don’t put music over these videos. I love to hear the sound of the engines working. Other than that beautiful jet!!
Sir, give me your email, i'll send you a version with original sound. :))
@@tuboprochannel8526 Why don't you just reupload it? A lot of ppl agree with HF here (me myself I'm fine with the music)
@@raddox7 Bro, thank for your comment. The next video i'll try to put original sound.
The fact that it works is amazing! Unbelievable design!
It is wonderful. But still it is more beautiful to see horizontal take off and landing. A thing of beauty is a joy forever.
wait until they invented mothership. vertical take off and landing would be so majestic.
*China is watching this video as a tutorial*
How about some narration to explain the concepts, less crappy music??
World best f35 lighting videos perfectly
Yak-141: that's my fking system!
Funny thing, the main idea comes from Soviet designers, which invent the first airplane with vertical take - up and landing system. Yak-38, and YaK-139
Бред, и манипуляции чистой воды, до хряка уже были самолёты с в вертикальным взлётом
Yeah yeah you Russian invented everything including humans, aliens and communism .
Yet you can’t compete with US in technology that’s why you are watching F35 videos 😂
No it didn't. The Russians were far from first to build a V/stol aircraft the Yak was designed well after the Harriet first flew. And the Yak 38, and 141 used separate dedicated lift engines for vertical flight. The F-35 B only uses 1 engine for all it's power. The U.S., great Britain, France, and Germany had vertical takeoff prototypes long before Russia did. Their first V/STOL air craft was a Mig-21 varient that used lift only engines.
Then why they didn’t build it first? But they they trying to steal the technology still now?
liar
Neighbour : "Hey whatcho got in your garage? Sounds like a nice Supra!"
The vehicle in my garage :
Thanks for the review. This makes me want to buy it
Contact Lookheed Martin to check stock ASAP, Bro! 🤣
This is an incredible machine.
When you can’t be bothered with your mission but you just think of the amount of work and how expensive and complicated this system is
Agreed! Almost the whole plane is the engine, not much space for other weapon or equipment.
the basic F35A already is a nightmare as far as maintenance and reliability, can't imagine how the VSTOL version, operating off carriers in a hostile environment is going to fare from that perspective. They should have stuck with the much simpler Harrier design and built a stealth version of that sturdy plane.
I think the vertical take-off feature will consume outrageous amount of energy. Traditional take-off consumes less energy.
Millions salutes to great engineers and scientists 👍👍
The F 35 is scrap and they bought the propulsion system from the Russian company Yakowlew (Yak 141). So hats off to Yakovlev engineers!
Fun fact : That's the alternative to minimalizer AvGas that F-35 use
How much gas does it use?
Amazing technology! Hope you share more!
Very well detailed.. awesome work
Dude thanks for cleaning the floor.
This f-35s gonna be a game changer for atg support lol
Tnks for making the video, now i know how f-35 vertical lift and land
I appreciate your research and video really good information thank you for sharing
Thank you so much for your compliment. I'm thrilled to hear that.
F35 vertical takeoffs still looks futuristic
Agree with your point, Bro.
@Tubopro Channel thanks a lot
Wow , magnificent engineering....
STOVL = Short TakeOff Vertical Landing. But I wanted it to S/VTOL = Short/Vertical TakeOff Landing, sounds more proper to me.
Thanks for the technology transfer!!
Молодцы,что тут скажешь!? Если люди могут и руки из правильного места растут,то пускай продвигают технологии,за ними будущее. ))
А мы у них цап царап
@@rudolfpolle6684 а мы у них чмок-чмок.
@@zuf4511 вы у них😁
@@rudolfpolle6684 а сейчас, даже и на цап-царап мозгов не хватает!🤷♂️ 🇷🇺-💩🤮👎👎👎⚰☦. 🇺🇸-👑🧠💪🎆🌞🥇👍👍👍👍👍✊!!!
Когда все пересядут на электросамокаты и забудут про велосипеды, американцы наснимают видео какю крутую они штуку придумали с двумя педалями на которой ездить можно сидя, и будут в переди планеты всей!) Главное что бы память у лохов была по короче.
let the engineers design it, let the mechanics maintain it, have the pilots fly it, and once it's ready, the politician will kill it.
the fact that this plane can be carried to anywhere in the world with a small ship or even submarine, taken out to the deck, take off and strike, is pretty amazing.
It de-centralizes the carrier's duty and makes it much harder for the enemy to predict.
Missiles can take it down easily
@@UnknownUser.ar1 Not really, the F-35 has some of if not the best stealth capabilities ever created. and in air to air combat the F35 will know where hostiles are before they even see it
amazing engg. really nice video , now i understand science behind vertical lift
Thank you very much, bro.
What are the set of doors behind the life fan? Looks like it takes in air for the engine in VTOL mode, but why can't the regular engine inlets pull in air?
I wanna see a video where an aircraft takes its flight after hovering via vertical takoff
me 2 honestly
There you go my friend th-cam.com/video/zW28Mb1YvwY/w-d-xo.html
Rất hiện đại.. Gần như đĩa bay rồi đó...
Great technology.
Yep.
50 year old Gas turbine in dual Configuration with two vector nozzle, ya that's for sure. The only thing fancy is The Pilots Cyber great, Cyber dynamic Profile and Composits and even that is mostly carbon Composits. If this is plasma tech I mean microwave warp coils embedded in the body of the entire airframe with fusion drive, built into the engine for Supplying the power to the coils during critical Mach speed, then it's 1 T worth.
I have a doubt pls help ... its ussing thrusters to take off vertically but after take off how will it move forward ??? Wats the process for that ??
Developed energy from magnets Stabilize the system With the gravity of the world Magnets of the same polarity can be plugged into each other to act as a mechanism to rise and fall on an object.
노즐의 방향이 수평일때는 열과 추진력이 그 대로 빠져나가서 엔진 토출구 연통에 부하가 덜하지만 수직으로 꺽여있는 상태에서는 연통에 부딪히는 열과 압력 추진력이 엄청날텐데 그걸 어떻게 견디는지 신기하다.
Hello Korean.
that is true i imagine it has been considered. i question the value of vertical take off.
키크드만잼ㅋㅋㅋ
견디는것이 아닌 버티는 것임, 즉 소모품처럼 자주 교체 해줘야함,
These vertical flying features were created by soviet engineers 40 years ago. Soviet YAK-144 Fernborough airshow 1992!
they weren't tho, they were created by american engineers for a plane called Convair 200.
Make a video on working of sukhoi 30 mki
Fun fact: There was no requirement for the F-35 to be able to do vertical takeoffs, just vertical landings. Because of that it is a STOVL aircraft rather than VTOL.
yeahh! i wondered why it wasnt called VTOL like the harrrier
Wow👏👏. Such an impressive piece of engineering. Wish our Kenya airforce can have such a toy☺️
Ask the Brits. They invented it.
how it converts from verical thrust to horizontal thrust when it vertically take off
From 2:00 you can see the illustration of what you need to know. Its rear exhaust nozzle is adjustable so the pilot can control the nozzle's angle then it can fly in different mode simultaneously
That music killed the vibe of the video
Sir, give me your email, i'll send you a version with original sound. :))
@@tuboprochannel8526 musìwatj@gmail.com
Excellent understanding
THANK FOR IMPORMATION NOW I UNDERSTAND HOW THIS ENGINES
Thanks for your watching, bro!
You deserve more subs.
Thank you so much! Have a nice weekend bro.
@@tuboprochannel8526 You're welcome. I see that you must have done a lot of research and editing in this video. I think you deserve 100k subscribers. I can't believe there are people out there that make stupid videos and they have more subs then you, honestly those people don't deserve any subscribers.
МОЩНЫЙ,ГРАЦИОЗНЫЙ
АППАРАТ !!!👍 🇺🇦
норм лизнул, бедные украинцы, везде свое клеймо ставят xD
F-35: The plane that the US did not give even though Turkey paid for it
Can it transfer from vertical take off to horizontal flight ?
Yes
The exhaust seems like an engineering marvel
It Seems like a booty hole
yet another amazing feat of the russian engineers.
...Советских !!!, не путать с путинской РэФэшкой....
Bullshit, russia can do nothing!!!
@@tesler312 the technology and design for the VSTOL came from the Russians.. Lockheed is transparent on that..
The music will drive u nuts
By the way, just today I saw a video with competition of STOVL RC models. I was very surprised.
Yep, That's amazing. Thank for watching.
i saw it too
It's like watching your classmate's presentation in 2007
It doesn't push out hot air but pushes taxpayer's money
Maybe you're right, :)
A marvellous piece of engineering but compared with the Harrier's four nozzles,
very complex.
Tempted to say....Long- winded.
I don't want to see how it does the vertical tricks, I want to see how it transit between hovering status and flying status.
i think after gaIning enough altitude and speed for enough lift to glide, they can reduce the engine thrust or switch it off , rotate it back and switch on to go forward....
@@klmnopq they will only have a vertical takeoff in very extreme situations or special operations, 99% of the time they will just have short takeoffs, when the plane will be fully loaded with fuel. Vertical landing is easier when the fuel is used up and the plane lighter.
Amazing how powerful the engines in the front must be.
No
@@smekbiggy2670 Thank you for your input.
the engine power on the front is just shared with the main engine thru a shaft.
@@simplethings2410 no, it’s getting electricity from the main engine. (It looks like) edit: it’s getting rotational energy from it
@@ethanspiegler8291 take a look at the shaft going to the front intake fan..
The video omits the STO/short takeoff. I saw that on another video. That seems safer and more fuel efficient that VTO. The video omits the transitions to and from vertical mode; the most difficult operations. Is this variant operational?
Yeah, I was thinking about it. If you come in high speed then switch mode, this could scratch the front fan hatch.
Combination of fighter jet and vertical landing 🤯🤯🤯
the Empty weight of F-35B is 32,472 lb (14,729 kg), and Powerplant is 28,000 lbf (125 kN) thrust dry, 43,000 lbf (191 kN) with afterburner. That means, F-35B can take maximal 4000kg fuel and bomb if it start vertikale. AV8B can take same fuel and bomb if it start vertikale. And AV8B can fly quickly than F-35B.
the AV8B is subsonic, the F-35 is supersonic, the AV8B cannot fly quicker than the F-35 is that what you were trying to say.
AV8B Top speed: 663mph
F35B Top speed: 1228mph
@@xavierrodriguez2463 AV-8B empty weight is 13,968 lb (6,340 kg)， Powerplant is 23,500 lbf (105 kN) thrust. It is 16.56N/kg. And F-35B is 12.97N/kg. F-35B is not supersonic.
@@xavierrodriguez2463 the F35 flying near its top speed of around Mach 1.6 could result in damage to its stealth coating, which would require a lot of down time and high repair costs. The F35 and F22 are the most maintenance heavy jet fighters ever built, with the lowest percentage of combat readiness, below 50%. That's the downside of this program. The F35B is likely the worst variant from this perspective, a lot of moving parts...
@@yzhangyzhang The AV-8B makes a shit ton of drag sorry, the F-35B is supersonic.
Thrust to weight doesn't mean as much as you think it means.
@@xavierrodriguez2463 do you think 16.56 less than 12.97?
Chinese engineers taking notes
They already have J31, sir.
And 1 Trillion development in the F35 Programme for this! from a Cyber Standpoint this is entry level bird. If this bird can punch Hyper-sonic like a Starfighter then it's fine, if not i would see it's quite a lot of money kind of wasted but not completely. I mean you can build Half of City square with that kind of Money
Ma l' f35b si può considerare un caccia a decollo verticale si o no? Può essere impiegato in tal modo?
Outstanding video! Are the roll nozzles fed off bleed air or exhaust?
There is a motor in the top opening cover.
How to change air flow in flying mode. Its to difficult
mera PubG ionize the air
I think the Harrier jump jet was a better design in the take off apartment, as it could transition to normal flight. The F35 cannot do that. Thus not really a full take off, as it didn't transition to horizontal flight. As far as I'm aware, the F35 simply cannot take off vertically and transition to flight. Some might claim that to be a significant failing in the design.
But it can transition to normal flight. The Aircraft was designed for "short take offs" but if is isnt weighted down by a full load of fuel and munitions..it most certainly can vertically lift off the ground AND transition to normal flight.
Of course F-35 can transition, plus it can go supersonic whereas harrier could not.
Hopefully they can improve the engine power. I still prefer the ducted fan design of the Harrier. If they could redesign the Harrier for supersonic flight, it could make a good addition to the range of options for allied forces.
Ask the Soviet engineers who made the YAK fighter, that is where the F35 was copied from.
By that logic the Soviets copied the STG44 with their AK because it uses the same gas system and layout.
@@myusername3689 I mean, for the most part they kind of did.
Sure man, but with that logic, why the heck do you copy me and you comment on youtube... Oh wait.. Am I doing it? The thing is that yak 141 failed, and it was such an old project, they could not copy that much with how to plane looks like now (f-35).
@@myusername3689 Their layouts are different, just watch their disassembly; only appearance is similar. The principle of gas system is common for lots of automatic weapons.
Why is it Stovl and not Tolv? It can take off vertically, so why is it considered short take off?
Vielen Dank für die tolle Erklärung!
jika naik secara vertikal apakah bisa langsung terbang?
Such a movie tech to see in real finally💓 hats off engineers 💕
Why don't we upgrade lca tejas with twin engines instead of making it mca mk2
lol
but how do they accelerate after hovering?
Won't it loose floating force when they try to go forward?
The rear engine is rotating, that's how it can go without problems from hovering to forward
vertikal holatda qancha balanga kutarilishining eng yuqori nuqtasi nechaga teng
Russian technology. After the Soviet Union collapsed. Boris Yeltsin provided the United States with access to Soviet project documents.
Not everyone thinks it's correct, bro. :)
no matter where it from, it's great technology. Thank you so much.
Keeping dreaming buddy. This here is good ol’ American made might. From blueprint to final product. This superiority is the outcome of something we like to call democracy. This work is the result of the minds that were born into freedom with no shackles to pin them down.
@@ammaralfata3198 you mean imported, right??
Check the names of scientists involved.
@@ammaralfata3198 stop sucking of export technology of Soviets U.S. dont like them but like their technologies
1:00 I don't believe this aircraft can take off vertically, and transition to horizontal flight. There are no videos that show this capability. It can go from horizontal, too hover, to landing, but not from takeoff, to hover, to level flight.
It is not VTOL (Vertical Take Off/and Landing), it's STVL (Short Takeoff/Vertical Landing).
Hm! I did not know that distinction.
exactly my thought. It supposed to be faced down on ground while moving forward from that height.
There is this video which show the transition from hovering to level flight. th-cam.com/video/vsKwBzt7rDY/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/vsKwBzt7rDY/w-d-xo.html
It's able to transit from vertical hover to horizontal flying
actually its STOVL but yeah
Don’t believe what are you seeing. The truth: the fuel tank is nearly empty for the vertical take off of F35. As soon as the aircraft is in the air, it needs refueling asp.
This! Exactly why you dont ever see vids of VTO to HF, fuels runs out too soon.
How much pressure is needed to lift it up? Where do this tremendous ait pressure comes from?There is an opening above the cockpit... Is it a passage of air input?....
There's a fan, Jesse
How does it go from vertical take off to forward flight?
rear thrust nozzle is aligned axially with fuselage and shaft to lift fan is disengaged
Интересно узнать расход на взлет. И посадку
Сколько смотрел он только вертикально, а дальше как горизонтальный полет
@@rassul0074 я в курсе, просто насколько я знаю - именно на взлет и посадку идет особенно большая часть расхода топлива.
Dikey iniş kalkış özellikte olan bu uçağı amerika vermiyorsa türk mühendisleri böyle özellikte olan bir uçak modeli yapmali tfx yanına alamıyorsak kopyalamak gerekir
SUPER!!!
Оч душевно!
Да красиво! Но, взлетел и на дозаправку.
What's advantage from this a new system in the aircraft F35
Quá sức tài giỏi, hiện đại quá , xem mới thấy tương lai con người làm được những gì mà bây giờ ta cho là phép thuật...