Thank you so much Alan Thease compilations are helping me expand more and more...just when at times I'm feeling a little lost... I will for shure look forward to listening to this over again... Much love from Ireland ❣
Transcendant Light... The Light of pure consciousness Shines through all things, Natures essential being, Transparent and Transforming, Consciousness Transcends, Through ways of Understanding, As the Light within expands, Through Awareness and Pure Knowing ........... 💗💗💗 .........
Dear Rupert ! Just sheer brilliance! Genius ! .. got you at once and it literally stopped me in my tracks (had to stop whatever nonsense it was doing and even had to sit down for a moment 🙈😅👍🙏☀️☺️) .. such an apparent small statement re. - I and that only pure awareness legitimately has this experience - all rest proclaiming this is just projection or hearsay or .. A small statement yet leading to a quantum leap ! Its a liberating dropping of the coin ! Uff ! Once you truly grasp this then you are so lovely deep down the rabbit hole that light is visible again on the other side ✨👍🙏 Thank you so much for your profound being and immense patience and lovely voice (supported by your gracious lovely hand gestures 👍🤩😊) 😊 thank you! 🙏👍✨❤️
🙏so l Recognize My Self As 'I' AM AS Pure Unconditioned State of Aware Presence of Being Which lS One Universal Self minus all of the finite concepts and labels💖Thank You Rupert and Alan for sharing The Light of our One shared l💖
@@alanneachell9092😊 ln my study of Christian Mysticisum it lS written that :"He lS of the to Pure Eye to behold iniquity..hence Be Ye therefore Perfect even As Your Father Whom lS in The Heaven lS Perfect" Where lS the Heaven..The Kingdom of God lS neither lo here ni lo there..l lS within You.."The place upon which thou standest lS The Holy Ground" 🙏The terms to define That Which lS The Essence of ALL THAT lS as Lao Tze wrote..in the beggining The Presence Existed.. l have called lT The TA☯..peraps l could have called lT The Fullness of Life"🙏The Symbol ☯ Reveals The One in ALL and ALL in The One lnfinite Undiferentiated " l AM That l AM"💖
@@borkapajic4154 If we looked at the world through a quantum lens we would see everything as a field of intelligent dynamism. We could call this dynamism God or presence. The Gospel of Thomas says "look under any stone and you will find me there" 🙏❣️
😊Yes, Those of the Mystical Vision have 'Revealed' for those Whose lnner ear IS open and the lnner eye that can SEE THAT Which the human eyes canot see nor can human ears hear.. "The Temple meade not with hands.."🙏
Whenever i used to sit as i am during meditation there was always a very subtle feeling of being a person, a body, a human being mixed with it which i could never differetiate but after listening to this beauty today it clicked what it really means to be "i am" thanks rupert 🙏and thanks Alan. 🙏🙏
Dennet as a diehard materialist, must believe that all there is in human consciousness and human physiological action thinking etc. Is the complex subatomic activity of the body, truthfully explained by conventional physics( he ignores the paradoxical nature of quantum physics since as a paradigm this physics strongly suggests consciousness in a physical system). However, his materialist theory must explain the efficacy of “folk psychology” in steering these walking dead in day to day activities, and so his proagmatist solution is to propose that the human is the “ intentional stance” a useful pragmatic psychology for everyday zombie activity. ( the joke in philosophy of mind for years about his book “ consciousness explained” was that its subheading was “consciousness unexplained” since the word consciousness appeared only 3 times in a 500 page book).
🤍Thank🦋Y🪷u Rupert for sharing 🌅Simply said T h a t Understanding REVEALED Through Rupert 🪷 lS The PURE💎of Non-Duality Consciousness 👁️ THAT Revalation on I AM , As Presented by Rupert .. lS Consciousness on 🔥 That WHEN Seen CLERLY Burns Away ALL of misunderstanding of The Nature of our TRUE😇Being🙏
Very profound! It would seem to me that ‘I’ therefore is the minutest distance in a line of sight, yet it is the bigger viewing/ seeing /vision. If a line of sight is retracted, all that is left is I. The experience of this brings one to the realization that ‘ I am ‘ and nothing more! Thank you so much for this Rupert and Alan! 🙏🙏
I do love it as well! I love also how Rupert is always able to find the exact words to make his point crystal clear, and I love how your 30 or so minute compilations brings to the table sufficient examples on the topic to really bring the point home.
The first 2.12 mins of the video was a very important key i missed since coming across the Direct Path! Hearing it phrased in that way has done something..... Thank you Alan
Far be it from me to refute Rupert Spira, but once the I is seen for what it Truly is….the essence of being…I find it more helpful to then orient myself with the active aspect of the self…the Am of I Am, considering it’s actually the closest description to what we are….to what I Am. As a verb, am-ness not only feels more accurate than I-ness, it feels more universal.
I, is the only Consciousness there is, it is not the body, not the thoughts, these are not conscious, they appear IN Consciousness. So you, appear in I🧡
@@alanneachell9092 my Teacher said, the 4 F's: Follow the master, (the I) Face the devil (the 'me') Fight till the end, Finish the game. So It is only a play of Consciousness. That what brought me here must take me home. 👍
I feel all that was needed was to shift the young man‘s point of vew from his small s to his big S (Self), and he would have understood what Rupert was getting at.
I have always found the question 'are you this feeling or are you aware of the feeling' annoying and I think this video explains why. As I understand it, the truth is more that you become aware of awareness rather than aware of feelings appearing in an 'I' who believes they are someone who has feelings. The 'or are you aware of the feeling' question makes me think of the homunculus that is located somewhere in me and which can observe or be aware of the feelings as they pass through - whereas the real situation is that you become aware of awareness instead of aware of an observer. Blimey.. writing a couple of sentences about this is a challenge so I don't know how he does 2hr talks..
Ask yourself, is the mind aware of you, I Am? Or, are you, I Am, aware of the mind? Apply this also to the body. I heard this question in a video by Swami Sarvapryiananda from the Vedanta Society NY. I believe this is what Rupert is also explaining. Please correct me if my understanding is not accurate. The mind/body cannot be aware of the I Am. Only the I Am can be aware of the body/mind. So there is only, I Am. There is no body/mind.
@@alanneachell9092 Thank you Alan. I sometimes get confused by the definition of mind. Thank you for clarifying that different teachers use mind as awareness or individual mind. This will help me not get caught up in the individual mind.
We are awareness. All is awareness. Consider what would happen if there was a God in the sky with a wooly beard who had created everything and he decided to flick the switch that turned off awareness. Give this deep consideration and then it will be seen.
In non-dualism, there is no “I”, no other. It is only the thinking mind, in its action of selfing, that “conceives” of a self, by “I”. Any concept or thought “I”, is the term the ego mind uses to refer to itself. It’s the heart of all deluded sense of separation. Rupert is clearly wrong in his views regarding the “I” and “I am”. “l” is always only a “thought”. In Buddhist “Anatta” “no self” awareness exists with no “I”. “I” automatically implies individuality and “other than” I. In the second video, he also claims no one can get “beyond mind”. “I” only exists in karmic mind. So many people are being mislead by his lectures to value the “I”. The “I” is the “me” is the ego. Why is Rupert so popular? It’s because he validates everyone’s ego by saying the “I” is divine. At the end of the second video he also mentions the “I am” “becomes conditioned by experiences”. Again this makes no sense. It does make sense if “I” is ego. Listen carefully, it’s not a matter of semantics... ... the confusion is, “I” cant refer to the absence of “I”. Pure Awareness or rigpa, is merely the Consciousness, or Buddha Mind, in absence of “I”. th-cam.com/video/zVXZ43e84uU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/ueU8o3y6SRA/w-d-xo.html
![THE TOYS x NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPa1d5cC8M4/mqdefault.jpg)
This talk is a no nonsense, no concession and totally direct. It might be that you listen more than once. Enjoy :)
It's radical. Thank You. Love.
Thank you really appreciated
Thank you. I adore these compilations.
Thank you so much Alan
Thease compilations are helping me expand more and more...just when at times I'm feeling a little lost...
I will for shure look forward to listening to this over again...
Much love from Ireland ❣
Again and again. if necessary.
Thank you Alan.
The Truth was expressed most accurately in the last 3 minutes of this video...
...and Rupert Spira does a great job too, as usual.
❤️😌🙏
Transcendant Light...
The Light of pure consciousness
Shines through all things,
Natures essential being,
Transparent and Transforming,
Consciousness Transcends,
Through ways of Understanding,
As the Light within expands,
Through Awareness and Pure Knowing
........... 💗💗💗 .........
Dear Rupert ! Just sheer brilliance! Genius ! .. got you at once and it literally stopped me in my tracks (had to stop whatever nonsense it was doing and even had to sit down for a moment 🙈😅👍🙏☀️☺️) .. such an apparent small statement re. - I and that only pure awareness legitimately has this experience - all rest proclaiming this is just projection or hearsay or ..
A small statement yet leading to a quantum leap ! Its a liberating dropping of the coin ! Uff ! Once you truly grasp this then you are so lovely deep down the rabbit hole that light is visible again on the other side ✨👍🙏 Thank you so much for your profound being and immense patience and lovely voice (supported by your gracious lovely hand gestures 👍🤩😊) 😊 thank you! 🙏👍✨❤️
Deep gratitude to our beloved Teacher rupert as well as Alan for putting for such a eternal supreme non-dual teaching
I love the space-room analogy. Very effective.
Bahut. Bahut. Gretitude. DhanyabadDhanyabadDhanyabad.
Alan and Rupert the spiritual dream team! Beautiful presentations of the most eloquent teacher I have ever heard.such clarity❤️
🙏so l Recognize My Self As 'I' AM AS Pure Unconditioned State of Aware Presence of Being Which lS One Universal Self minus all of the finite concepts and labels💖Thank You Rupert and Alan for sharing The Light of our One shared l💖
What you have beautifully described is the first step. Now it's important to see that even the arisings and concepts are that. 🙏❣️
@@alanneachell9092😊 ln my study of Christian Mysticisum it lS written that :"He lS of the to Pure Eye to behold iniquity..hence Be Ye therefore Perfect even As Your Father Whom lS in The Heaven lS Perfect" Where lS the Heaven..The Kingdom of God lS neither lo here ni lo there..l lS within You.."The place upon which thou standest lS The Holy Ground" 🙏The terms to define That Which lS The Essence of ALL THAT lS as Lao Tze wrote..in the beggining The Presence Existed.. l have called lT The TA☯..peraps l could have called lT The Fullness of Life"🙏The Symbol ☯ Reveals The One in ALL and ALL in The One lnfinite Undiferentiated " l AM That l AM"💖
@@borkapajic4154 If we looked at the world through a quantum lens we would see everything as a field of intelligent dynamism. We could call this dynamism God or presence. The Gospel of Thomas says "look under any stone and you will find me there" 🙏❣️
😊Yes, Those of the Mystical Vision have 'Revealed' for those Whose lnner ear IS open and the lnner eye that can SEE THAT Which the human eyes canot see nor can human ears hear.. "The Temple meade not with hands.."🙏
Thank you again for another masterpiece! These compilations are so helpful.
And thank you Alan 👍🙏🌺✨
I am aware of my hand, my hand is not self aware- so as my torso, head, arms and legs, thoughts, feelings
Clear, beautiful, profound. A match to set 🔥 to the haystack . Burn, baby, burn! Thank you Alan 🌹
Great job, Thank you dear Alan.
Whenever i used to sit as i am during meditation there was always a very subtle feeling of being a person, a body, a human being mixed with it which i could never differetiate but after listening to this beauty today it clicked what it really means to be "i am" thanks rupert 🙏and thanks Alan. 🙏🙏
Thankyou - I will listen right before I go to sleep. I will prbwbly sleep well because of the woderful ay this man affects my heart. 🧡
Enjoy.
Thank you so much Alan, from a French woman. For me it is the best video to understand what I am. Thank you for all the others videos. Gratitude !
So nicely explained Sir I do not know what way I can give a BIG THANK YOU to you Sir. You are just superb!
Ghanshyam Khemani
India
Dennet as a diehard materialist, must believe that all there is in human consciousness and human physiological action thinking etc. Is the complex subatomic activity of the body, truthfully explained by conventional physics( he ignores the paradoxical nature of quantum physics since as a paradigm this physics strongly suggests consciousness in a physical system).
However, his materialist theory must explain the efficacy of “folk psychology” in steering these walking dead in day to day activities, and so his proagmatist solution is to propose that the human is the “ intentional stance” a useful pragmatic psychology for everyday zombie activity.
( the joke in philosophy of mind for years about his book “ consciousness explained” was that its subheading was “consciousness unexplained” since the word consciousness appeared only 3 times in a 500 page book).
I cannot be the body or mind, because what makes up the body and mind (thoughts, sensations and perceptions) come and go, and I remain, undiminished
Excellent, Alen! Thank you.! 💚🙏
Thanks Alan for sharing these Gems with us. 🙏🩵
Thanks so much to the questioner, to Rupert, and yourself for uploading Alan :)
Wow, what a start in the weekend. Very thankful😍
🙏💕
🤍Thank🦋Y🪷u Rupert for sharing 🌅Simply said T h a t Understanding REVEALED Through Rupert 🪷 lS The PURE💎of Non-Duality Consciousness 👁️ THAT Revalation on I AM , As Presented by Rupert .. lS Consciousness on 🔥 That WHEN Seen CLERLY Burns Away ALL of misunderstanding of The Nature of our TRUE😇Being🙏
What a start of the day, Thank you so much! 🙏🙏
This is perfect! 💖🙏🌌
Very powerful and profound Pointing indeed! Thank you Alan 🙏❤️
🙏💕
Thank you
Thankyou Alan🙏🙏🙏
Another great clarification on Awareness from Rupert
Wow! Profound
I am that I am. No correspondence to experience. Thank you.
I is profound. ❤🙏
Very profound! It would seem to me that ‘I’ therefore is the minutest distance in a line of sight, yet it is the bigger viewing/ seeing /vision. If a line of sight is retracted, all that is left is I. The experience of this brings one to the realization that ‘ I am ‘ and nothing more! Thank you so much for this Rupert and Alan! 🙏🙏
I love this dialogue and the group here did also. Thanks for your comment 💕
I do love it as well! I love also how Rupert is always able to find the exact words to make his point crystal clear, and I love how your 30 or so minute compilations brings to the table sufficient examples on the topic to really bring the point home.
Thank you so so much Alan 👃👃👃
🙏🙏🙏
Excellent
Yes ❤️
The first 2.12 mins of the video was a very important key i missed since coming across the Direct Path! Hearing it phrased in that way has done something..... Thank you Alan
Yes, the phrasing is very important 🙏
20:41
Thanks Alan. Straight talking indeed
Yes, it's a good one eh?
Alan Neachell yes incredible. Hope ur well
@@parmydeol6966 yes, thanks 😊 Hope you are too.
Far be it from me to refute Rupert Spira, but once the I is seen for what it Truly is….the essence of being…I find it more helpful to then orient myself with the active aspect of the self…the Am of I Am, considering it’s actually the closest description to what we are….to what I Am. As a verb, am-ness not only feels more accurate than I-ness, it feels more universal.
I, is the only Consciousness there is, it is not the body, not the thoughts, these are not conscious, they appear IN Consciousness.
So you, appear in I🧡
So you appear in yourself 😉
@@alanneachell9092 do i like it? 🤔🧐enough is enough😊
@@TheAmbamatamantrasvideos 🤗😇
@@alanneachell9092 my Teacher said, the 4 F's:
Follow the master, (the I)
Face the devil (the 'me')
Fight till the end,
Finish the game. So It is only a play of Consciousness.
That what brought me here must take me home. 👍
@@TheAmbamatamantrasvideos 👍
I feel all that was needed was to shift the young man‘s point of vew from his small s to his big S (Self), and he would have understood what Rupert was getting at.
Thanks ... Its a tough programme .. A virus has just been introduced ... 👍
Woah
❤️
🙏❤️
🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️❤️👏❤️👏❤️👏❤️
"There is no actual experience that corresponds to the statement: "I am a human being"
It's one of those statements that sparks our attention 😊
@@alanneachell9092 It sure does 🙂
🥰🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🥰
I have always found the question 'are you this feeling or are you aware of the feeling' annoying and I think this video explains why. As I understand it, the truth is more that you become aware of awareness rather than aware of feelings appearing in an 'I' who believes they are someone who has feelings. The 'or are you aware of the feeling' question makes me think of the homunculus that is located somewhere in me and which can observe or be aware of the feelings as they pass through - whereas the real situation is that you become aware of awareness instead of aware of an observer.
Blimey.. writing a couple of sentences about this is a challenge so I don't know how he does 2hr talks..
Yes, some explanations work for us and some don't 🙃
@@alanneachell9092 all there is knowing of observing so It might include being aware of observer also?
🧐🔬🧬⚛️
Ask yourself, is the mind aware of you, I Am? Or, are you, I Am, aware of the mind? Apply this also to the body. I heard this question in a video by Swami Sarvapryiananda from the Vedanta Society NY. I believe this is what Rupert is also explaining. Please correct me if my understanding is not accurate. The mind/body cannot be aware of the I Am. Only the I Am can be aware of the body/mind. So there is only, I Am. There is no body/mind.
Yes, Rupert says bodies are not aware, only awareness is aware.
That is our direct experience if we look.
Body is an appearance only. Teachings use different definitions of mind. Mind can be modelled as awareness or "individual" mind.
@@alanneachell9092 Thank you Alan. I sometimes get confused by the definition of mind. Thank you for clarifying that different teachers use mind as awareness or individual mind. This will help me not get caught up in the individual mind.
So what if we are conciousness?
Consciousness is pristine and un-disturbable and when we truly recognise that in our direct experience we live as that.
Who is thinking.is life and awareness one what is experiencing this world.steel I think the source cannot be named or known.
Right, it can't be named but it can be pointed to.
maybe THOMAS NAGEL WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A BAT?
🤣
We are awareness. All is awareness. Consider what would happen if there was a God in the sky with a wooly beard who had created everything and he decided to flick the switch that turned off awareness. Give this deep consideration and then it will be seen.
In non-dualism, there is no “I”, no other. It is only the thinking mind, in its action of selfing, that “conceives” of a self, by “I”.
Any concept or thought “I”, is the term the ego mind uses to refer to itself. It’s the heart of all deluded sense of separation.
Rupert is clearly wrong in his views regarding the “I” and “I am”.
“l” is always only a “thought”. In Buddhist “Anatta” “no self”
awareness exists with no “I”.
“I” automatically implies individuality and “other than” I.
In the second video, he also claims no one can get “beyond mind”.
“I” only exists in karmic mind.
So many people are being mislead by his lectures to value the “I”. The “I” is the “me” is the ego.
Why is Rupert so popular? It’s because he validates everyone’s ego by saying the “I” is divine.
At the end of the second video he also mentions the “I am” “becomes conditioned by experiences”. Again this makes no sense. It does make sense if “I” is ego.
Listen carefully, it’s not a matter of semantics...
... the confusion is, “I” cant refer to the absence of “I”. Pure Awareness or rigpa, is merely the Consciousness, or Buddha Mind, in absence of “I”.
th-cam.com/video/zVXZ43e84uU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/ueU8o3y6SRA/w-d-xo.html
Couldn't be clearer, yet identification happens.