Notice how in Rupert's model, he takes everything back to knowing which is a complete mystery. Isn't that the same as Tony Parsons and co. statement that all there is, is "this"?
@@alanneachell9092 For sure, and I believe Tony calls it energy? They're pointing to the same thing. I do feel that Rupert's model is more elaborate, with the idea of a progressive path and a halfway stage, so to speak. That's not a criticism; I get why and it appeals to me. Tony seems to cut right to the chase. Different flavours for different minds, I suppose. I like both!
Life is a journey through Differentiation first and Integration as the following spiritual step and beyond language, because language is the Medium of Differentiation only.
Alan thank you. I have a very child like question. Just knowing. I feel the Perfection in that. Why does my knowing involve experiences of atrocities? And others more 'normal' mundane knowing. 💜🙏
It's not your knowing, it's just knowing. I know it's difficult but everything arises equally as knowing and it's only judgement that seperates bad from good. Amazingly when there is no judgement, then solutions come to right the apparent wrongs. The paradox is amazingly delicious 🙏
@@alanneachell9092 thank you Alan. I have experienced this with quite a few of the atrocities I experienced. Not all. I want to stay in the Perfection of Knowing. No story. 💜🙏
'I am' is separation. It is knowing and it is also the need to know; I need to know that I have meaning and purpose; I need to know that I have free will and choice; I need to know what happens after death and so on ad infinitum. There is no end to the 'need to know.' It is never satisfied by 'more knowing.' The 'need to know, ' is the origin of religions and spirituality. It brings about 'seeking.' I am is the contracted energy in the body. It is the cause of duality. It is the cause of the apparent separation. Duality/separation cannot become non-duality by dint of more 'knowing'. Call it what you will - awareness/consciousness, conscious awareness, or awareness of awareness. The problem of duality and separation cannot be resolved by more separation. There is only all there is. What is, is not a 'something'. It is no - thing or 'nothing' and yet it appears as everything. There is nothing outside of all there is. There is nothing inside of all there is. There is not a separate 'somebody' inside of all there is. Thus any attempt to know all there is would also be all there is because there is no separation. There is not two. That is the definition of non-duality. The contracted energy in the body which gives rise the the appearance of a separate Self is illusory. The I am is an illusion. It is an appearance. An appearance cannot find a non-appearance. Somebody cannot find nobody. No one has a life, there is only life. There is nothing else. Nothing needs to happen. No one is moving in a bubble through time called 'my life.' So far from there being only knowing, there is only unknowing since what is cannot be known. There is no knower. There is no hope of something else. No hope for the Seeker.
@@alanneachell9092 There is no self because there is not two. There is no self plus the knowing of self. Self is not separate from all there is. There is no subject outside of all there is which can know all there is as a subject, therefore what is cannot be objectified. It is not a thing. It is no thing or nothing and yet it appears as everything. What is, is nothing and everything simultaneously.
@@passingthrough2463 I don't keep records. The compilations are taken from different tasks which I download from Rupert's web site. A single compilation may come from 3 or 4 talks. I delete the clips as I use them ❣️🙏
Hey Alan! Just wondering if you’d ever be willing to make a Tony Parsons video? I love his message but a lot of it could be edited down and flowed effortlessly together like you do with ruperts videos! Much love
@@vuqarcfrov216 Yes, I know Tony. Rupert's way is to make concessions to the contracted sense that Tony describes. After that it's pretty much about terminology. Tony doesn't like the awareness word but talks about energy. I can't find a difference but I like them both ☺️
@@alanneachell9092 Hi Alan:) See that, I did not mean he is not like Rupert, I meant he does not like Rupert and his teachings. He is pretty agressive about it even :) th-cam.com/video/CDTqgnQXK4w/w-d-xo.html
Wonderful and comforting! And in a strange way one cannot help but feel an overwhelming sense of gratitude for the current state of world in as much as it seemingly forces a greater of awakening. Once one has come to the realization that all there is is knowing and stand as that, all else disappears, even fear and anxiety subsides.
Loved it… last couple of minutes were most valuable thing I have ever heard 28:00 and maybe only few of us will be fortunate to reach here. And music while you listen takes you to same dimensions of placeless place from where this is radiating from.❤
Knots are opening up to the eternal wisdom , rather merging with it to say it correctly after this video. Indebited to Rupert, the master and ever so grateful to you for compiling it concisely!
It's understandable when we get familiar with ourselves as awareness. I'm more than happy to point that out to you in your direct experience if you would like to. You can find me on Facebook. 🙏💕
Always at the right moment
Thank you Alan
Much love from Ireland 🇮🇪
Less and less do you flicker back and forth between ego and awareness until finally you radiate as pure awareness seeing all objects as yourself
Oh, I’m definitely saving this one. So many important pointers/distinctions in just thirty minutes. This was truly inspired, Alan. Thanks ❤️
Thank you Alan, Rupert, indescribably beautiful.
Gem of a compilation of the teachings of a gem of a person!
That is what losing in your SELF. That is the place to be🙏🏾
Dearest Alan…Warmest Gratitude for this Live Beauty..!! 🙏. So powerful & Live..🌷
No words… Alan & Rupert..! ❤️
Comforting! Thank you Alan ❤🙏
wonderful
Thank you Alan 💗
Love your music Alan. Thank you for another jewel. 💕
Thank you very much👌🌹.
Dear Alan ...again and again thank you for your wonderful work ...warmest regards and all the best - Hannes, Austria, Erlaufsee
Thank you Hannes 🙏💕
💚👌🍀 Hvala, Alane!
P. S. Slažem se ovim što je rekao @Pignut! 💚
Love the sound of rain
Yeah, I got soaked making this one : )
Notice how in Rupert's model, he takes everything back to knowing which is a complete mystery.
Isn't that the same as Tony Parsons and co. statement that all there is, is "this"?
@@alanneachell9092 For sure, and I believe Tony calls it energy? They're pointing to the same thing.
I do feel that Rupert's model is more elaborate, with the idea of a progressive path and a halfway stage, so to speak. That's not a criticism; I get why and it appeals to me. Tony seems to cut right to the chase. Different flavours for different minds, I suppose. I like both!
@@stevenl.5490 yeah, me too
Hi Alan, I like how you keep these contemplative mixes to 30 minutes(ish); not too long, not too short - perfect 👌
Thank you 🙏
Life is a journey through Differentiation first and Integration as the following spiritual step and beyond language, because language is the Medium of Differentiation only.
Once Someone was searching his mobile phone in dark lighting it’s own flashlight which he was searching!
Finding a Self with Self !
Alan thank you. I have a very child like question. Just knowing. I feel the Perfection in that. Why does my knowing involve experiences of atrocities? And others more 'normal' mundane knowing. 💜🙏
It's not your knowing, it's just knowing.
I know it's difficult but everything arises equally as knowing and it's only judgement that seperates bad from good.
Amazingly when there is no judgement, then solutions come to right the apparent wrongs. The paradox is amazingly delicious 🙏
You recognised the perfection in knowing.
See that all apparent arisings are made of that knowing
@@alanneachell9092 thank you Alan. I have experienced this with quite a few of the atrocities I experienced. Not all. I want to stay in the Perfection of Knowing. No story. 💜🙏
💛
Alan where can I find the soundtrack you used in this video? Its absolutely awe-inspiring.
I only have it as a short clip but would be happy to send you.
@@alanneachell9092 please do!
'I am' is separation. It is knowing and it is also the need to know; I need to know that I have meaning and purpose; I need to know that I have free will and choice; I need to know what happens after death and so on ad infinitum. There is no end to the 'need to know.' It is never satisfied by 'more knowing.' The 'need to know, ' is the origin of religions and spirituality. It brings about 'seeking.' I am is the contracted energy in the body. It is the cause of duality. It is the cause of the apparent separation. Duality/separation cannot become non-duality by dint of more 'knowing'. Call it what you will - awareness/consciousness, conscious awareness, or awareness of awareness. The problem of duality and separation cannot be resolved by more separation. There is only all there is. What is, is not a 'something'. It is no - thing or 'nothing' and yet it appears as everything. There is nothing outside of all there is. There is nothing inside of all there is. There is not a separate 'somebody' inside of all there is. Thus any attempt to know all there is would also be all there is because there is no separation. There is not two. That is the definition of non-duality.
The contracted energy in the body which gives rise the the appearance of a separate Self is illusory. The I am is an illusion. It is an appearance. An appearance cannot find a non-appearance. Somebody cannot find nobody. No one has a life, there is only life. There is nothing else. Nothing needs to happen. No one is moving in a bubble through time called 'my life.' So far from there being only knowing, there is only unknowing since what is cannot be known. There is no knower. There is no hope of something else. No hope for the Seeker.
Knowing, knowing knowing.🙏💕
@@alanneachell9092 There is no 'knowing' It cannot be known. There is not two. There is not a 'knower' and the 'known'.
@@marksmith1779 If there was no knowing there would be nothing. All there is, is what's happening and it is self knowing.
@@marksmith1779 I didn't mention a known
@@alanneachell9092 There is no self because there is not two. There is no self plus the knowing of self. Self is not separate from all there is. There is no subject outside of all there is which can know all there is as a subject, therefore what is cannot be objectified. It is not a thing. It is no thing or nothing and yet it appears as everything. What is, is nothing and everything simultaneously.
Hi Alan, the female voice 'belongs' to Louise Kay ... correct?
I don't know, sorry
@@alanneachell9092 It must be her ... unless she has a doppelgänger😉.
When was the recording you took this excerpt from?
@@passingthrough2463 I don't keep records. The compilations are taken from different tasks which I download from Rupert's web site. A single compilation may come from 3 or 4 talks.
I delete the clips as I use them ❣️🙏
@@alanneachell9092 Thank you, Alan!
Hey Alan! Just wondering if you’d ever be willing to make a Tony Parsons video? I love his message but a lot of it could be edited down and flowed effortlessly together like you do with ruperts videos! Much love
I love Tony, let me check it out 💕🙏
Tony does not like Rupert by the way:)
@@vuqarcfrov216 Yes, I know Tony.
Rupert's way is to make concessions to the contracted sense that Tony describes. After that it's pretty much about terminology. Tony doesn't like the awareness word but talks about energy. I can't find a difference but I like them both ☺️
@@alanneachell9092 Hi Alan:) See that, I did not mean he is not like Rupert, I meant he does not like Rupert and his teachings. He is pretty agressive about it even :) th-cam.com/video/CDTqgnQXK4w/w-d-xo.html
@@vuqarcfrov216 I understood what you said. I know Tony doesn't like Rupert's model.
7,8,9...
Then you have not understood it.
Bla bla bla
would you care to elaborate?
You're very welcome to say anything here as long as it's respectful 🙏💕
Wonderful and comforting! And in a strange way one cannot help but feel an overwhelming sense of gratitude for the current state of world in as much as it seemingly forces a greater of awakening. Once one has come to the realization that all there is is knowing and stand as that, all else disappears, even fear and anxiety subsides.
🙏💕
No words! Silence of Buddha,Ramanmaharshi, silence itself. Dakshinammurti taught his disciples being silent.🙏🏾
Loved it… last couple of minutes were most valuable thing I have ever heard 28:00 and maybe only few of us will be fortunate to reach here. And music while you listen takes you to same dimensions of placeless place from where this is radiating from.❤
6.53
16,17....
Alan you are a blessing. Blessings to you. Such a clarity of 3 stages. Then circle is complete,🙏🏾❤️👍🏽
🙏💕
Knots are opening up to the eternal wisdom , rather merging with it to say it correctly after this video. Indebited to Rupert, the master and ever so grateful to you for compiling it concisely!
1000 times thank you at least Alan . Sooooooooooooooooooooo beautiful
This is advanced stuff.i don't understand half of it
It's understandable when we get familiar with ourselves as awareness. I'm more than happy to point that out to you in your direct experience if you would like to.
You can find me on Facebook. 🙏💕
20
27...
DhanyabadDhanyabadDhanyabad thanksgretitude dhanyabad thanks
Artistically beautiful and nurturing
Thanks Alan 😊🙏💕
4
❤️
No not a direct experience! Not a thing. Everything and nothing simultaneously. Does not make sense. I know.
There is direct experience but there is nothing experienced.
Yes, it can't be described until it's "seen" by no one.
I have zero problem with your formulation.
No again. A direct experience would be a thing. I speak of no - thing or nothing.
Why?
No "thing" is implied