Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
"Knowledge can only be called a knowledge when it has the ability of answering the questions of present time" Old knowledge was only good for old times. We need CHANGE!
Islamic law k naam par molvio or liberals ks dhokha Aurat kaam kar sakty hai lekin co working systems me nhi kr sakty aap department bilkul alag alag kar dijiye ladies department me gents not allowed gents department me ladies not allowed ye asli women empowerment hoga fir to molvi sahab bhi apni bachchi ko job k liye promote kar saktay hain bina kisi financial problem k DOORANGI CHOR DE YAQ RANG HO JAA YAA SARASAR MOM HO YAA FIR SANG HO JAA abhi kya hai naa to islam hi hai or naa hi koi doosra system properly hai
Highly commendable effort, Sir. Keep enlightening our hearts through innate truth; you're one of very few scholars who are expressive beyond biased convictions.
in true islam" namaz means system ensuring equality in providing security and safety of honour, wealth and life of all is equal; roza means, every man and woman are bound to have war training to fight in the days of wars. zakat means share happiness and sorrows with each other; hajj means stage a jihad against who attack a muslim state. a muslim is who believe on equality with aiman on Hazrat Muhammad PBUH as messenger of God and God is alone
An excellent effort Dr. Taimur, greatly commendable. You explained and clarified very eloquently and to understanding of the layman, concepts which are usually very sophisticated and far from their reach both intellectually and academically
Sir bat ye hai k jb hum Shariah law ki implementation ka fesla krengy us wqt ki hakumat aur Scholars ki zimadari hogi k wo modern systems ko bhi in depth study kren aur Islamic system ko bhi. esk baad ye dekha jayga k Islamic system k ander rehty huwy modern systems ko kis had tk accept kiya ja sakta hai. Apka ye argument k Islamic Shariah apny wqt k lehaz sy qabil-e-amal thi aik had tk theek hai mager Islamic Shariah wqt k sath sath lazmi tor per develop hoti agar hum zawal ka shikar na ho jaty. Point ye hai k Islam etnay flexible aspects rakhta hai k wo modern systems k sath apni hadood me rehty huwy mukamal compatible ho sakta hai. Yahan per me phir wohi kahunga k key point " Ijtihad" hai jo Islamic govt. ki pehli zimadari hai Islam ki modern interpretation k liye esi ki hadood me rehty huwy
Jo sawal aap ne uthaey hain yaqeenan us ka aik mukammal Jawab hamarey ulema ke pas hona chahiye. Aur jo silsila aimma e arba ke bad Ruk chuka hai usko dobara continue hona chahiye. Jaisakey aap ne iqbal ko quote Kia. Magar mera ye khayal hai ke Islam aik system ka nam hai jokey complete hai. Humney jadeed taqazon ke mutabiq usmey research nai ki ye hamari naehli hai. Allah ke Nabi Salallah u Alain e Wassalam ke zamaney me makkah aur Medina ki aabadi bohut kam thi magar Hazrat Umer Raziallah Taala ke zamaney me jab islami hukumat barhi to ye Quran ki talimaat theen jisper laws bhi baney aur aaj bhi ban saktey hai.
Salam Taimur, its quite informative and impressive channel you have. Really glad I found your channel! please do not stop making content.. would love to have a coffee with you when next time visiting Pakistan, or if you visit Melbourne please let me know..
Great Dr Taimur, you are really expert in your field of economics.... I will always like to learn its basics from your lectures, but I feel that before comparing Islam with midernism, you should consult renowned and educated Islamic scholars videos like dr Israr, Dr zakir naik, modoodi, engineer muhammad ali Mirza etc... I hope you will not mind it....
the scholars you have mentioned (except Dr. Zakir Naik) are extremely radical and extremists, to name a few: -Israr Ahmed (don't even add the name of dr., he doesn't deserve it): The baddest name in the list, he is famous for his anti-semetic speeches and and is equally responsible for the anti-semetic sentiments in Pakistan -Maududi: The person how, in the front line, opposed the Muslim league and the creation of Pakistan, Dr. Taimur Rehman has a lecture on this, you can watch that
May it be clarified that a husband striking their spouse albeit lightly is not permitted for day to day domestic çonflicts. It is the last resort only in the case of adultery.
my advice for all to also listen modern islamic scholars namely dr. Asar-ul-Islam and Allama Pervez Ahmad to hear true Islam, which has no link with one we are following at present. hundreds of videos of both the scholars are available on youtube
Sir ap ny fiqa ki ro sy bataya sab quran ki ro sy batain .... Sir syed phr dr.iqbal sab phr ghulam ahmed perveez sab jidad pasand hain .. ap bohat acha explain kar rhy hain.... Bohat acha laga ap ka critical comparison karna .... Per ghulam ahmed perveez sab ko parhain or sunain.... Wo bhi khuch aesi bt karty thy about fiqa.... Per he was clear about quran.... Me ap ko soun rha hun appreciated about ur way to deliver knowledge in a simple words....
Superbly explained, well done, Dr. Sahb. Watched all of the 5 parts, and it really rang the bell :p. Well, just one thing, ain't the slavery abolished by Kharzt Umar RA ?. As per Tibrani, etc. and the first sermon of Khazrt Umar RA, slavery was abolished since then, as he said that human is born free (open to criticism :p )
Sir I would highly recommend you to listen or study ghamidi sahab on all these points. There are programs on geo tv as well I think where ghamidi sahab discussed these things with a feminist.
I have been watching your videos from cuple of months only I am too interested and getting knowledge and wiseness 😇 thank sir I enjoyed your vedios and I will in future too . I would like to make a meeting with you sir in life INSHALLAH
If Iqbal was a modernist, will you explain these lines of his. بھلا دی ہم نے جو اسلاف سے میراث پائی تھی آسماں سے زمیں پر ثریا نے ہم کو دے مارا Why he is referring to the past to achieve glory in the modern world?
Mashallah 🖤 Ap ne acha comparison kia hai .... Ap ne philosophy achay se parha mgr Islamic philosophy main apko aboor nhi hai .... Ap ne baat ki choti umar main shadi ki tu aap (s.a.w) ne pehli shadi 25 saal ki umar main ki Jo k na umar ka behtreen daur smjha jata hai .... Dosri baat jitni wusaat apko Islam daita koi modernism nhi daita ... Mgr afsoos aj k daoor main hm logon ko izzat Islam wali chahiye aur Azadi Europe wali ..... Sir agr ap itna deeply Islam ko smjhtay jitna ap ne philosophy ko smjha tu shydd ap pe bhi asar e khudi khultay aur apko apna aur Islam ka mukam pta hota .....
Dr Taimur, G A Parwez tried to present a rational interpretation of the Quran in which he dealt with some inconsistencies you have highlighted between traditionalists and Modernists. If you have had a chance to read Parwez, please , through a future video, let us know if Parwez had some positive ideas to get us out of this tussle between traditionalists and Modernists. You may wish to do one on Javed Ghamidi as well in this regard.Thanks 😊 😊
. يُوصِيكُمُ اللَّهُ فِي أَوْلَادِكُمْ لِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ الْأُنثَيَيْنِ فَإِن كُنَّ نِسَاءً فَوْقَ اثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُنَّ ثُلُثَا مَا تَرَكَ وَإِن كَانَتْ وَاحِدَةً فَلَهَا النِّصْفُ وَلِأَبَوَيْهِ لِكُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِّنْهُمَا السُّدُسُ مِمَّا تَرَكَ إِن كَانَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ فَإِن لَّمْ يَكُن لَّهُ وَلَدٌ وَوَرِثَهُ أَبَوَاهُ فَلِأُمِّهِ الثُّلُثُ فَإِن كَانَ لَهُ إِخْوَةٌ فَلِأُمِّهِ السُّدُسُ مِن بَعْدِ وَصِيَّةٍ يُوصِي بِهَا أَوْ دَيْنٍ آبَاؤُكُمْ وَأَبْنَاؤُكُمْ لَا تَدْرُونَ أَيُّهُمْ أَقْرَبُ لَكُمْ نَفْعًا فَرِيضَةً مِّنَ اللَّهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا حَكِيمًا Surah 4 Ayat 11 Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females: if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased Left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. (The distribution in all cases ('s) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, Al-wise. اللہ تمھاری اولاد کے باب میں تمھیں ہدایت دیتا ہے کہ لڑکے کا حصہ دو لڑکیوں کے برابر ہے۔ اگر لڑکیاں دو سے زائد ہیں تو اُن کے لیے ترکے کا دو تہائی ہے اور اگر اکیلی ہے تو اُس کے لیے آدھا ہے اور میت کے ماں باپ کے لیے ان میں سے ہر ایک کے لیے اِس کا چھٹا حصہ ہے جو مورث نے چھوڑا، اگر میت کے اولاد ہو۔ اور اگر اُس کے اولاد نہ ہو اور اُس کے وارث ماں باپ ہی ہوں تو اُس کی ماں کا حصہ ایک تہائی اور اگر اُس کے بھائی بہنیں ہوں تو اُس کی ماں کے لیے چھٹا حصہ ہے۔ یہ حصے اس وصیت کی تعمیل یا ادائے قرض کے بعد ہیں جو وہ کر جاتا ہے۔ تم اپنے باپوں اور بیٹوں کے متعلق یہ نہیں جان سکتے کہ تمھارے لیے سب سے زیادہ نافع کون ہو گا۔ یہ اللہ کا ٹھہرایا ہوا فریضہ ہے۔ بے شک اللہ ہی علم و حکمت والا ہے۔
Wonderful interpretation Sir. You have mentioned the concept of Ijtehaad. So instead of saying that Islamic Sharia is obsolete, isn't better to say we need to moderanize it.? Because it is a very strong aspect of our society. How can Muslim Scholars be able to mederanize it? Scholars like Ghaamdi, Doctor Taahirul Qaadri etc. Kindly elaborate this? What needs to be done to convince the traditionalist? They won't take it easy to challange their monopoly on religious aspects.
Javed Ghamidi is an highly appreciate-able and intellectual person, but the problem in modernizing Sharia Law is that it is a law bring by God in a very different time, where no socio-political system existed, there was no such thing as state, many tribes and areas in the time of Muhammad (PBUH) applied sharia in their own informal ways. Applying Sharia now in a "state" where a socio-political system exists would cause many problems like human rights, in order to apply sharia, Muslims have to change everything, from their economics to political system to identity of their state. Thank You.
Rawaiti ulma k nukta e nazr ko islam se mansob ni kia ja skta..kch chezen wo ghalt btaty hen jesy ap ne kaha..magr asal ma jo message ha wo wohi ha jo jadeed zehn sochta ha..baki jadeed zehn bi her bt ma thk ni ha..kch chezu ma islam ki hikmat smjhny ki zrorat ha..shukria Islam qayamat tak rehnumai k liye aya ta..ap s.a.w akhri nabi hen..quran akhri kitaab ha..islam mukamal zabta e hayaat ha..simple..bs is ko smjhna zrori ha.
Assalam dr taimoor ki knowledge se kafi kuch seekhne ko mila lekin in lectures men nihayat naaqis maloomat he aapki With due respect. Riwayat pasand pe aapne sari tanqeed ki or mozu aapka islami shariyat he jo k 2 mukhtalif baten he islamic shariyat k kisi aik usool ko aapne theek adress nahi kya na tanqeed ki bunyaden theek rahi. Aapke mozu ka naam riwayat pasandi or jedeediyat pasandi hona chahye tha na k islami shariyat. With due respect sir lekin aapki info "islami shariyat" k hawale se qatan theek nahi. Thank u so much sir
ایسا ہے کہ اللہ نے کچھ ایسے قوانین بناے ہیں جنہیں کوئی انسان بدل نہیں سکتا مثال کے طور پر آپ کی نسل آگے عورت کے ذریعے ہی بڑھے گی آپ یہ نہیں کہہ سکتے کہ یہ عورتوں کے ساتھ زیادتی ہے اس لیے ایک سال عورت جنم دے اور اگلے سال مرد - یہ ایک مستقل قانون ہے کسی کو پسند ہو یا نہ ہو - یہ ہر کسی کو ماننا پڑے گا- چونکہ اللہ نے یہ دنیا انسان کو ٹیسٹ کرنے کے لیے بنائی ہے اس لیے کچھ قوانین انسان کو بتا کر اختیار دے دیا ہے یہ دیکھنے کے لیے کہ یہ میری مانتے ہیں یہ اپنے نفس کی - ان قوانین کو مانو گے تو اس میں تمہارا ہی فائدہ ہے نہ مانو گے تو نقصان بھی تمہارا ہے- اگر اللہ نے مرد کو عورت پر فضیلت دے دی ہے یہ عورت کو مرد پر تو جو اس آیت کو مانے گا وہی ایمان والا ہے نہ کہ اس آیت کا انکار کرنے والا- اگر کوئی یہ سمجھتا ہے کہ عورت کا حصہ جائیداد میں مرد کے برابر ہونا چاھیے تو وہ اس آیت کا انکاری ہے - اسے حقوق کی بجاے اپنے ایمان کی فکر کرنی چاھیے- ہاں اگر یہ حصہ کسی فقہ نے یا عالم نے خود سے اخز کیا ہے تو اس کو بدلا جاسکتا ہے- دوسری صورت میں جو بھی قرآن کی کسی آیت کا انکاری ہے تو اسے شخص کو یہ سمجھ لینا چاھیے کہ یہ کتاب جس کا نام قرآن ہے اس کے لیے نہیں ہے - وہ اپنے آپ کو اس سے فارغ سمجھے- پھر جو دل میں آے کرتا پھرے-
A an excellent presentation. Learned a lot about history, analysis and modern implications and limitations of sharia law. I listened to this wonderful presentation in one sitting. Kindly, make future lectures combined into one Very grateful for your efforts for this and all your lectures.
There was a scholar/activist named Ghulam Ahmad Pervez in 20 century have a lots of books published by Talooa-e-Islam Trust and have many lectures about wrong Islam(fabricated) vs good islam(pure in Quran) on video sharing websites mostly on youtube also talked about Allama Iqbal vision mostly. If you read or listen about him, What is your(Dr. Taimoor Rehman) take\comment\opinion about him?
Sir I listened your all five lectures and I think that we must keep a balance between new philophies and Islamic laws. Imams before 13th century interpreted islam according to the demands of their eras. So, Iqbal has rightly said that we must understand and interpret Islam once again according to our era's demands because Islam is a complete code of life! Allah Almighty has completed DEEN. There is no need of more teachings. Quran will keep showing miracles till QAYAMAT! I disagree with yours and JADIDIAT PASAND's views about Islamic laws about women, judgements and all others you talked about in your lectures. I think, we have interpretations to understand those laws! Western economic and judicial system is disaster for us. If it would have been workable, there would not have been so much of interest system. Nawaz Sharif and Musharaf would have been punished for their crimes. Western judicial system allows you so many things and is soft for a lot of crimes. We must implement Islamic laws.
Sir kindly respond to these questions thanku! 1.Can the socio-economic and criminal justice system of Pakistan be improved through proper implementation of rules and laws as prescribed by Islam? 2. Through the system of zakat the social imbalances can be soothed?
Maturity varies person to person. Kuch log chalis sal k ho k bhi mature nahi hote. Puberty achieve karne ke chand sal ke andar shadi ki badolat zina se bachne Ka bahaut chance ha. Ye zina wali bt liberals bhool jate hain
Sir. Please study ghamidi sahb .all points you said are not belongs to islam .these are belongs to the religious thoughts of muslims. Please reply thanks
Bas zaroorat isbat ki hai ke aap jesey qabil log agar is medan me kam karen to koi shak nai ke hum jadeed qawaneen bana saken jis ki Bunyan Islam ke usool hon.
Ha ek baat ye zaroor kahunga k aap tamam jiddat pasando se acchi zaban rakhte hai aur umeed karta hu k acchi soch bhi rakhte honge, Is liye aapse guzarish karunga k shaikh hamza yusuf k kuch lactures ko sune wo ek American hai jo 14 saal ki umra me musalman hue the kyuki mujhe lagta hai wo western culture ko ham hind o pak ke logo se zyada jante honge to aap ko kuch nai baat sunne ko mile. Mai unke aksar lactures sunta hu. Allah ham sab ko hidayat de aapka bhai india se 🇮🇳
Comrade USSR ke education ,employment , internal external trade ,constitution par bhi lectures banaiye.aapke samjhane ka tarika bahut umda ha.ho sake to hindi me bhi lectures banaye. Lal salam from india
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
@@mubashirharal9789 Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
Sharia k 4 source hain quran , sunnah, ijma aur ijtihad Hazrat Muhammad( S.A.W) ne kaha tha k jab mere baad koi msla aye ga jis ka hal quran aur sunat se na mila tou kya kro gay jis par jawab dia gaya tha k " ijtihad". Allama iqbal ka bhi yehi point of view tha k agr ijtihad ka process hi ruk gya tou sharia law apni true sense mai nafiz hi ni ho sakta
Islam sy pehly slavery baqaida aik institution ki hesiyat rakhti thi millions ki tadad me log jabri ghulami per majboor thy. Islam ny azad insano ki kharid-o-farokht per pabandi lagai jo aik inqilabi act tha. Slavery ki sirf aik surat jaiz thi k Medan-e-jang me jo qaidi hath aein wo slave ki hesiyat ekhtiyar ker jaty thy eski 2 wajoohat thein. Aik ye k jo Qaidi pakry jaty agar unhen azad ker diya jata tou wo dubara State k liye khatra bnty qk wo jangjoo log thy dusri wja ye thi k ghulam bna ker unki proper terbiyat ki jati thi unko ye moka milta tha k wo Islam ko qareeb sy dekh saken aur eska hisa bn saken State me shamil ho saken. yahan ye baat bhi ahm hai k har Qaidi ko ghulam nahi bnaya jata tha balky jo fidya ada kr saky ya koi skill sikha saky wo azadi hasil ker sakta tha. Jo haqooq Islam ny Ghulamo ko ata kiye kya wo us dour me kisi aur jaga ghulamo ko hasil thy? un haqooq ki puri aik fehrist di ja sakti hai jo ghulamo ko Islam ny diye. Jahan tk kanizon ka taluq hai wo qk apny Owner ki mukamal zair-e-kifalat thien es liye unsy jismani rishty ki ijazat di gai agar aesi bay sahara Females ko azad rakha jata tou wo zindgi kis trha guzartien unki kifalat kon krta? ye amal bhi aik trha sy unki protection k liye tha. ye sb Ghulam wo thy jo Medan-e-jang me hath ay unki settlement k liye Ghulami ko jari rakha gya qk ye possible nahi tha k aik dam sy ghulami khatam kr di jati. Ghulam ko azad kerny ki trgheeb, azad logon ko ghulam bnany per pabandi, Ghulamon k haqooq ye sb Islam k zaberdast iqdam thy.
Sawal: Since most of the Muslim majority countries try to adopt sharia law in the constitution. Which Muslim majority countries you think are the most successful in adopting them in the best way, in modern terms?
Being a physicist i have undergone in depth studies of those fields that you take 100 percent predictable. Infact in physics if you could delve into reality the actual behavior of system is subjective not objective, for the measurement influences what you are seeing. a photon you use to see an electron disturbs his state. what you perceive in daily life is an average behavior. The point is what we see is always subjective and average not real behavior. it depends upon who is seeing and can not be free of subjectivity. Look the end is clear. Sun is gonna die. temperature gonna reach equilibrium where all universe is at same temp. stars gonna disappear in future leaving us no where. My personal opinion is who you are what you are following irrespective of that atleast follow ethical behavior which is average of all religions, people and socieites agreed by all. All are humans. Consensus is built up on ethics. it would take time to develop in other domains as well. Do not put tag of liberalism, conservatism, secularism to create differences. don't compare for wrong reasons. past can be true as can present,for present is gonna become past in near future. everything has a role in universe and diversity give rise to beauty. Instead of searching for perfection in this universe which itself is gonna end we need to find common point and accept diversaties as they are. As a muslim I don't find Islam antagonistic to anything. It is just our wrong perception.I have one solution. just like we do experments. why not we set all major models in perfect way to small domains covering few hundred people and small territories and try to analyze empirically then. I hope this would help to build consensus. as we science men do experiments in lab. let the states do their experiments and help them and in case if some problems arise work as a team to find the causes and solutions of those experimental modals. we can spend billion of dollars on a space ship. why can not we design artificially such modals and then compare them by certain parameters. when the people would see results they are themselves gonna build a consensus
Likin sir Allama Iqbal to hme itne ziada modernist nai nazar ate wo kehte the k "juda ho deen sisat se to reh jaati he changezi" "Apni Qias araian aqwaam e maghrib se naa kr khaas he tarkeeb me qoum e Rasool hashmi Is k ilawa mujhe ese lgta he k jese wo West ko pasand nai krte the. shaid unhon ne democracy ki bhi mukhtalif ki he so please make a comprehensive video on this topic ...and please make debate with Orya maqbool jaan. He often criticise democracy and West especially their family system and open sexuality.
Respected Sir, please make a video regarding books in which we can study about Muslim Philosophers . And also do give review on those books. Sir there are not many books which discuss Muslim Philosophers in detail rather they are discussed in brevity for example in A C Grayling's book only twenty pages are given to Islamic Philosophers with minute details.So,your help is required in this matter.
After your lecture I can analyse some people put efforts to take our u math for high standard. Some people doesn't like to change from theological aspect... Wat I think y they conflicts each other let's make all concept together and make some branches Dnt hate each other hates comes became our ummath didnt grow.. Ikthilaf make dis unity in the ummah..
The political system is the most debatable issue for Pakistan. The Local Government and other matters can be democratized. Then there should be a federal state. But we also need a Caliphate to protect the interests of all the Muslim states combined. Like nowadays, US is the defacto Caliphate of the western powers. There should be a powerful central Caliphate to protect the interests and rights of the Muslims/Islamic states all over the world. We failed to implement any democracy and thrived under the dictatorships. The so called democratic parties are political monarchs themselves and no one is willing to empower grass root local government system. Our legislative, Executive, Business/Feudal and local Govt powers are all concentrated within our provincial assemblies only.
Sir you are a great scholar. I learn alot from your lectures but this lecture is not much convincing for you may have not knowledge in depth regarding islam.
The blasphemy law, as you have explained has nothing to do with the Islamic jurisprudence rather your views seems originates from the law in vogue in Pakistan...
آپ کی معلومات اور سمجھ ویسٹرن علوم اور جدیت کے بارے میں بہتر ہے مگر دین کے بارے میں سمجھ کو امپروو کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔۔ آپ نے تمام اقساط میں اسلام کو جدید ٹرمنولجی کے تحت ڈفائن کرنے کی کوشش کی۔۔ یہی بڑی غلطی زمانے سے ہورہا ہے۔ جدید اصطلاحات کو کنارے کر کے دین کی اصطلاحات کے مطابق سمجھیں مسئلہ حل ہو جائے گا انشاء اللہ۔
The freedom of speech was given by Umar Farooq (R.A). Do you know how much freedom he had given to his people to criticize him. The persians even throwed stones on him and threatened him even. Islam also doesn't allow falsely accuse people. Islam also doesn't allow to the character assassination of people. And what you said about Blasphemy Laws. Now in Pakistan the law doesn't say to see the intention of the person. But previous Islamic Jurists always see the intention of the person then give the judgement. Determination of intention has always existed in Traditional Islam. But now in so-called Islamic Republic of Pakistan the law is misused. So we need to stop the misuse and we need determine the intention of blasphemer.
If a British soldier rebel against his army and nation he will be punished. So this why if a Muslim leave Islam he actually has become a rebel if Islam. Abu Bakr Siddiq (R.A) punished the apostates. Was he wrong to punish them.
Another misinterpretation. Sir, men and women have equal status in society. But in family system their status is different just like a mother is superior than her child because she is mother. But in Islamic society men and women have equal status.
It is not the Ulema who say that it is our Prophet (peace be upon him) who siad that when a woman is a head of state that nation will be destroyed. Are you more intelligent and wise than our Prophet (peace be upon him).
How can you judge that a child of 13 or 14 years of age isn't mature. When Ayesha (R.A) said that a 9 years girl is a mature women and even the medical science also says that chil get maturity from the age 9 to 12, then who are you to judge that who is mature or not. You are not a doctor. When your western countries put age limit, then teenagers started their sexual life without marriage. Every year 1 million teenage girls become mother in America. Because they have sexual urge and they need to fulfill it. So I would allow if my daughter wants to marry at young if she likes a boy. But I won't allow her to live as friends which is un Islamic. I would marry her where ever she wants.
Are you liberals more wise than Allah. The laws of inheritance given by Allah has more wisdom than your opinions. A man has more financial responsibilities than women which is why boys get double inheritance. Man has to take the responsibility of his wife and children. If the you say that women should have equal share in inheritance than tell all women that they should take care off themselves. They should not be a burden to their husbands. They should have equal financial responsibility in family life.
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
True. Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
Why can't we see the prophet to be a Man of his time. Can see the restraints you are subjecting yourself to. Good job. Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth. Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
ابے اسلام جدید ہی ہے اور یہ مرد اور عورت اسلام میں برابر ہیں ان دونوں کی ساخت کی وجہ سے یہ فرق نظر آتا ہے جو انکی طبیعت کے لیے اور صحت کے لیے بہتر ہے اسلام میں غلامی جائز ہے لیکن پسندیدہ نہیں
اگر کوئی شخص قرآن کا غلط مفہوم سمجھا تو یہ اس کی اپنی غلطی ہے نہ کہ قرآن کی ۔۔ ڈاکٹر صاحب کو بہت سےمعاملات میں یہی مسئلہ ہے ڈاکٹر صاحب نے قرآن کا کی بات بنا دی جو کہ ملا ازم تھا اگر قرآن خود پڑھیں تو شاید یہ مسئلہ نہ ہو
sir ap k sary parta mai ne sun liye mgr.... ap Islamic laws or moderns laws ki bat karty han to aik bat ap ko zror note karni chaheya k islam kabi bhe in quality pa base nai karta AP farma rhy han k islam mai orat k hoqoq nai hai to ap ko elam hoga k orat ko izzat islam ne dia es se phaly Arab mai orat k 7 kia hota tha ap ko maloom hoga lehaza agr orat ki haq ki bat ho to islam he wo phla religion hai jes nai orat k hoqoq dryaft keya. AP dakh lain AJ bhe Europe mai orat k kia hoqoq han ap agr only Pakistan or America ko comparison kary to ap ko pta chaly ga k hmary han orat ko ketni izat de jati hai.ap ne bat ki k orat ko gawa mai mard k equal nai kia islam ne to es mai yea logic hai k orat jazbati hoti, orat jald pegal jati hai or orat os trah nai soch sakhti hai jis trha mard soch sakta hai. AP ne kabi yea suna hai k orat ne koey chez ijad ki ho? nai na q k orat present time k elawa etni gehrai se nai soch sakti hai . yea mera point of view tha agr ap ko bura laga to mozerat
Ap na buhat se foreign loogo Ka hawala Diya....per ap na ik hawala bi ahdees ki rohe se Nahi Diya......jis se nazar ata hia k ap Ka apna point of view Kia hia.....
Blasphemy laws insaniat ke Name par aik bohat hi bad numa dhaba hain Jin ka na koi Islami talimat aur na hi jadid insani values see mutabiqat rakhta hai
@@qa2623 Kahan par parha hai ye? Kiyon tum logon ko masoom insanon ko qatal karne ka itna shauq hai. Quran, Hadees aur sunatee nabwi see ye sabit nahin hai balke haqiqat is ke barax hai yani Nabi Pak ne apni tohin karne walon ko koi saza nahin di aur nahi sahaba karam ko is ki ijazat di. Ye sab tumharee jahil, fasadi aur din firosh Mullon ne bad mein ijad ki hain.
اللہ ﷺ مکہ مکرمہ میں تشریف فرماتھے کسی نے حضور سے عرض کیا: (آپ کی شان میں توہین کرنے والا ) ابن خطل کعبہ کے پردوں سے لپٹا ہوا ہے آپ ﷺ نے فرمایا اسے قتل کردو (صحیح بخاری ،باب دخول الحرم و باب این رکز النبی ﷺ الرایہ یوم الفتح ، الصارم ا لمسلول علی شاتم الرسول ،) عبد اللہ بن خطل مرتد تھا جو رسول اللہ ﷺ کی ہجو میں شعر کہہ کر حضور ﷺکی شان میں توہین کرتاتھا ۔ اس نے دوگانے والی لونڈیاں اس لئے رکھی ہوئی تھیں کہ وہ حضور ﷺ کی ہجومیں اشعار گایا کریں ۔ جب حضور اکرم ﷺ نے اس کے قتل کا حکم دیا تو اسے غلاف کعبہ سے باہر نکا ل کر باندھا گیا اور مسجد حرام میں مقام ابراہیم اور زم زم کنویں کے درمیان اس کی گردن اڑا دی گئی ( فتح الباری ، باب این رکز النبی ﷺ الرایہ یوم الفتح )۔ اس دن ایک ساعت کے لئے حرم مکہ کو حضور اکرم ﷺ کے لئے حلال قرار دیا گیاتھا بیت اللہ سے صرف چندقدم کے فاصلے پر اس کا قتل کیا جانااس بات کی دلیل ہے کہ گستاخ رسول باقی مرتد ین سے بدرجہابدتر ہے ۔پوری انسانیت کویہ بات اچھی طرح معلوم ہونا چاہئے کہ ہر مسلمان کے دل میں حضور ﷺ کی محبت دنیا کی ہر چیز سے زیادہ ہے
@@qa2623 Sirf un logo ko qatal kya jo riyasat se baghawat krty aur law and order ko kharab krty. Agar aap kisi ka nuqsan na kro to aap kuch bhe krty rho kehny mein kya jaata he bhai. Kya farq parhta he. Blasphemy laws incomplete aur outdated hen yeh logo ko marny ka acha tareeqa he tauheen ka ilzam lgado bux.
![เปิดบ้าน นาราเครปกระเทย 1 ไร่ ขายขาดทุนหลัก10ล้าน เอามาใช้หนี้!!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jz84VFWVP4/mqdefault.jpg)
Good efforts . App ke is pure lecture se ham ko bahot si nai baten pata chali.
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
"Knowledge can only be called a knowledge when it has the ability of answering the questions of present time" Old knowledge was only good for old times. We need CHANGE!
Islamic law k naam par molvio or liberals ks dhokha
Aurat kaam kar sakty hai lekin co working systems me nhi kr sakty
aap department bilkul alag alag kar dijiye
ladies department me gents not allowed
gents department me ladies not allowed
ye asli women empowerment hoga fir to molvi sahab bhi apni bachchi ko job k liye promote kar saktay hain bina kisi financial problem k
DOORANGI CHOR DE YAQ RANG HO JAA
YAA SARASAR MOM HO YAA FIR SANG HO JAA
abhi kya hai naa to islam hi hai or naa hi koi doosra system properly hai
God bless you to share the best information
Highly commendable effort, Sir. Keep enlightening our hearts through innate truth; you're one of very few scholars who are expressive beyond biased convictions.
in true islam" namaz means system ensuring equality in providing
security and safety of honour, wealth and life of all is equal; roza means,
every man and woman are bound to have war training to fight in the days of
wars. zakat means share happiness and sorrows with each other; hajj means stage
a jihad against who attack a muslim state. a muslim is who believe on equality
with aiman on Hazrat Muhammad PBUH as messenger of God and God is alone
Sab se pehley to bohut shukria. Ye info share Kerney ke liey. Tamam disagreements ke sath me aap ke lectures ko bohut appreciate karta hun.
An excellent effort Dr. Taimur, greatly commendable. You explained and clarified very eloquently and to understanding of the layman, concepts which are usually very sophisticated and far from their reach both intellectually and academically
Best one
Sir bat ye hai k jb hum Shariah law ki implementation ka fesla krengy us wqt ki hakumat aur Scholars ki zimadari hogi k wo modern systems ko bhi in depth study kren aur Islamic system ko bhi. esk baad ye dekha jayga k Islamic system k ander rehty huwy modern systems ko kis had tk accept kiya ja sakta hai. Apka ye argument k Islamic Shariah apny wqt k lehaz sy qabil-e-amal thi aik had tk theek hai mager Islamic Shariah wqt k sath sath lazmi tor per develop hoti agar hum zawal ka shikar na ho jaty. Point ye hai k Islam etnay flexible aspects rakhta hai k wo modern systems k sath apni hadood me rehty huwy mukamal compatible ho sakta hai. Yahan per me phir wohi kahunga k key point " Ijtihad" hai jo Islamic govt. ki pehli zimadari hai Islam ki modern interpretation k liye esi ki hadood me rehty huwy
Jo sawal aap ne uthaey hain yaqeenan us ka aik mukammal Jawab hamarey ulema ke pas hona chahiye. Aur jo silsila aimma e arba ke bad Ruk chuka hai usko dobara continue hona chahiye. Jaisakey aap ne iqbal ko quote Kia. Magar mera ye khayal hai ke Islam aik system ka nam hai jokey complete hai. Humney jadeed taqazon ke mutabiq usmey research nai ki ye hamari naehli hai. Allah ke Nabi Salallah u Alain e Wassalam ke zamaney me makkah aur Medina ki aabadi bohut kam thi magar Hazrat Umer Raziallah Taala ke zamaney me jab islami hukumat barhi to ye Quran ki talimaat theen jisper laws bhi baney aur aaj bhi ban saktey hai.
Salam Taimur, its quite informative and impressive channel you have. Really glad I found your channel! please do not stop making content.. would love to have a coffee with you when next time visiting Pakistan, or if you visit Melbourne please let me know..
Great Dr Taimur, you are really expert in your field of economics.... I will always like to learn its basics from your lectures, but I feel that before comparing Islam with midernism, you should consult renowned and educated Islamic scholars videos like dr Israr, Dr zakir naik, modoodi, engineer muhammad ali Mirza etc...
I hope you will not mind it....
the scholars you have mentioned (except Dr. Zakir Naik) are extremely radical and extremists, to name a few:
-Israr Ahmed (don't even add the name of dr., he doesn't deserve it): The baddest name in the list, he is famous for his anti-semetic speeches and and is equally responsible for the anti-semetic sentiments in Pakistan
-Maududi: The person how, in the front line, opposed the Muslim league and the creation of Pakistan, Dr. Taimur Rehman has a lecture on this, you can watch that
May it be clarified that a husband striking their spouse albeit lightly is not permitted for day to day domestic çonflicts. It is the last resort only in the case of adultery.
Exactly. Really important point missed in the lecture.
my advice for all
to also listen modern islamic scholars namely dr. Asar-ul-Islam and Allama
Pervez Ahmad to hear true Islam, which has no link with one we are following at
present. hundreds of videos of both the scholars are available on youtube
Sir ap ny fiqa ki ro sy bataya sab quran ki ro sy batain .... Sir syed phr dr.iqbal sab phr ghulam ahmed perveez sab jidad pasand hain .. ap bohat acha explain kar rhy hain.... Bohat acha laga ap ka critical comparison karna .... Per ghulam ahmed perveez sab ko parhain or sunain.... Wo bhi khuch aesi bt karty thy about fiqa.... Per he was clear about quran.... Me ap ko soun rha hun appreciated about ur way to deliver knowledge in a simple words....
Thanks a ton sir
Superbly explained, well done, Dr. Sahb. Watched all of the 5 parts, and it really rang the bell :p.
Well, just one thing, ain't the slavery abolished by Kharzt Umar RA ?.
As per Tibrani, etc. and the first sermon of Khazrt Umar RA, slavery was abolished since then, as he said that human is born free (open to criticism :p )
I Loovvvveddddd this series of yours!!! Tysm ❤️ more power to you 💙 thanx a ton sir 🇮🇳
thanks aap ne bhaut aacha rsamjhaya
Zbrdast
Sir I would highly recommend you to listen or study ghamidi sahab on all these points. There are programs on geo tv as well I think where ghamidi sahab discussed these things with a feminist.
Thankyou for your efforts sir.
Great effort
Thsnk you Taimor sb Learned a lot
I have been watching your videos from cuple of months only I am too interested and getting knowledge and wiseness 😇 thank sir I enjoyed your vedios and I will in future too .
I would like to make a meeting with you sir in life INSHALLAH
If Iqbal was a modernist, will you explain these lines of his.
بھلا دی ہم نے جو اسلاف سے میراث پائی تھی
آسماں سے زمیں پر ثریا نے ہم کو دے مارا
Why he is referring to the past to achieve glory in the modern world?
Allama iqbal was a human being he could be wrong
Bro your right
read his prose not his poetry
In islam men and women are equal you can listen Dr. Zakir 3 hours speech he proved there is no discrimination in islam .
Mashallah 🖤
Ap ne acha comparison kia hai ....
Ap ne philosophy achay se parha mgr Islamic philosophy main apko aboor nhi hai ....
Ap ne baat ki choti umar main shadi ki tu aap (s.a.w) ne pehli shadi 25 saal ki umar main ki Jo k na umar ka behtreen daur smjha jata hai ....
Dosri baat jitni wusaat apko Islam daita koi modernism nhi daita ...
Mgr afsoos aj k daoor main hm logon ko izzat Islam wali chahiye aur Azadi Europe wali .....
Sir agr ap itna deeply Islam ko smjhtay jitna ap ne philosophy ko smjha tu shydd ap pe bhi asar e khudi khultay aur apko apna aur Islam ka mukam pta hota .....
Dr Taimur, G A Parwez tried to present a rational interpretation of the Quran in which he dealt with some inconsistencies you have highlighted between traditionalists and Modernists. If you have had a chance to read Parwez, please , through a future video, let us know if Parwez had some positive ideas to get us out of this tussle between traditionalists and Modernists. You may wish to do one on Javed Ghamidi as well in this regard.Thanks 😊 😊
My lecture on Jinnah also looks at GA Perwez.
Dr. Rahman aapse humble request hai ki aap Islam and women ke context me ek video banaye.
. يُوصِيكُمُ اللَّهُ فِي أَوْلَادِكُمْ لِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ الْأُنثَيَيْنِ فَإِن كُنَّ نِسَاءً فَوْقَ اثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُنَّ ثُلُثَا مَا تَرَكَ وَإِن كَانَتْ وَاحِدَةً فَلَهَا النِّصْفُ وَلِأَبَوَيْهِ لِكُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِّنْهُمَا السُّدُسُ مِمَّا تَرَكَ إِن كَانَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ فَإِن لَّمْ يَكُن لَّهُ وَلَدٌ وَوَرِثَهُ أَبَوَاهُ فَلِأُمِّهِ الثُّلُثُ فَإِن كَانَ لَهُ إِخْوَةٌ فَلِأُمِّهِ السُّدُسُ مِن بَعْدِ وَصِيَّةٍ يُوصِي بِهَا أَوْ دَيْنٍ آبَاؤُكُمْ وَأَبْنَاؤُكُمْ لَا تَدْرُونَ أَيُّهُمْ أَقْرَبُ لَكُمْ نَفْعًا فَرِيضَةً مِّنَ اللَّهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا حَكِيمًا Surah 4 Ayat 11
Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females: if only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased Left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. (The distribution in all cases ('s) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, Al-wise.
اللہ تمھاری اولاد کے باب میں تمھیں ہدایت دیتا ہے کہ لڑکے کا حصہ دو لڑکیوں کے برابر ہے۔ اگر لڑکیاں دو سے زائد ہیں تو اُن کے لیے ترکے کا دو تہائی ہے اور اگر اکیلی ہے تو اُس کے لیے آدھا ہے اور میت کے ماں باپ کے لیے ان میں سے ہر ایک کے لیے اِس کا چھٹا حصہ ہے جو مورث نے چھوڑا، اگر میت کے اولاد ہو۔ اور اگر اُس کے اولاد نہ ہو اور اُس کے وارث ماں باپ ہی ہوں تو اُس کی ماں کا حصہ ایک تہائی اور اگر اُس کے بھائی بہنیں ہوں تو اُس کی ماں کے لیے چھٹا حصہ ہے۔ یہ حصے اس وصیت کی تعمیل یا ادائے قرض کے بعد ہیں جو وہ کر جاتا ہے۔ تم اپنے باپوں اور بیٹوں کے متعلق یہ نہیں جان سکتے کہ تمھارے لیے سب سے زیادہ نافع کون ہو گا۔ یہ اللہ کا ٹھہرایا ہوا فریضہ ہے۔ بے شک اللہ ہی علم و حکمت والا ہے۔
Wonderful interpretation Sir.
You have mentioned the concept of Ijtehaad. So instead of saying that Islamic Sharia is obsolete, isn't better to say we need to moderanize it.?
Because it is a very strong aspect of our society. How can Muslim Scholars be able to mederanize it? Scholars like Ghaamdi, Doctor Taahirul Qaadri etc.
Kindly elaborate this? What needs to be done to convince the traditionalist? They won't take it easy to challange their monopoly on religious aspects.
Javed Ghamidi is an highly appreciate-able and intellectual person, but the problem in modernizing Sharia Law is that it is a law bring by God in a very different time, where no socio-political system existed, there was no such thing as state, many tribes and areas in the time of Muhammad (PBUH) applied sharia in their own informal ways. Applying Sharia now in a "state" where a socio-political system exists would cause many problems like human rights, in order to apply sharia, Muslims have to change everything, from their economics to political system to identity of their state. Thank You.
Outstanding
Rawaiti ulma k nukta e nazr ko islam se mansob ni kia ja skta..kch chezen wo ghalt btaty hen jesy ap ne kaha..magr asal ma jo message ha wo wohi ha jo jadeed zehn sochta ha..baki jadeed zehn bi her bt ma thk ni ha..kch chezu ma islam ki hikmat smjhny ki zrorat ha..shukria
Islam qayamat tak rehnumai k liye aya ta..ap s.a.w akhri nabi hen..quran akhri kitaab ha..islam mukamal zabta e hayaat ha..simple..bs is ko smjhna zrori ha.
Very informative.
Assalam dr taimoor ki knowledge se kafi kuch seekhne ko mila lekin in lectures men nihayat naaqis maloomat he aapki With due respect. Riwayat pasand pe aapne sari tanqeed ki or mozu aapka islami shariyat he jo k 2 mukhtalif baten he islamic shariyat k kisi aik usool ko aapne theek adress nahi kya na tanqeed ki bunyaden theek rahi. Aapke mozu ka naam riwayat pasandi or jedeediyat pasandi hona chahye tha na k islami shariyat. With due respect sir lekin aapki info "islami shariyat" k hawale se qatan theek nahi. Thank u so much sir
Sir plz make a video on Rahimia institute of Quranic Sciences trust Lahore that what kind of narrative thet are presenting in our society..
Thank you very much from Srinagar Kashmir
ایسا ہے کہ اللہ نے کچھ ایسے قوانین بناے ہیں جنہیں کوئی انسان بدل نہیں سکتا مثال کے طور پر آپ کی نسل آگے عورت کے ذریعے ہی بڑھے گی آپ یہ نہیں کہہ سکتے کہ یہ عورتوں کے ساتھ زیادتی ہے اس لیے ایک سال عورت جنم دے اور اگلے سال مرد - یہ ایک مستقل قانون ہے کسی کو پسند ہو یا نہ ہو - یہ ہر کسی کو ماننا پڑے گا- چونکہ اللہ نے یہ دنیا انسان کو ٹیسٹ کرنے کے لیے بنائی ہے اس لیے کچھ قوانین انسان کو بتا کر اختیار دے دیا ہے یہ دیکھنے کے لیے کہ یہ میری مانتے ہیں یہ اپنے نفس کی - ان قوانین کو مانو گے تو اس میں تمہارا ہی فائدہ ہے نہ مانو گے تو نقصان بھی تمہارا ہے-
اگر اللہ نے مرد کو عورت پر فضیلت دے دی ہے یہ عورت کو مرد پر تو جو اس آیت کو مانے گا وہی ایمان والا ہے نہ کہ اس آیت کا انکار کرنے والا- اگر کوئی یہ سمجھتا ہے کہ عورت کا حصہ جائیداد میں مرد کے برابر ہونا چاھیے تو وہ اس آیت کا انکاری ہے - اسے حقوق کی بجاے اپنے ایمان کی فکر کرنی چاھیے- ہاں اگر یہ حصہ کسی فقہ نے یا عالم نے خود سے اخز کیا ہے تو اس کو بدلا جاسکتا ہے- دوسری صورت میں جو بھی قرآن کی کسی آیت کا انکاری ہے تو اسے شخص کو یہ سمجھ لینا چاھیے کہ یہ کتاب جس کا نام قرآن ہے اس کے لیے نہیں ہے - وہ اپنے آپ کو اس سے فارغ سمجھے- پھر جو دل میں آے کرتا پھرے-
Agreed!
A an excellent presentation. Learned a lot about history, analysis and modern implications and limitations of sharia law.
I listened to this wonderful presentation in one sitting. Kindly, make future lectures combined into one
Very grateful for your efforts for this and all your lectures.
Great! You explained the whole scenario,quite comprehensively. Would like to know what's your stance on equality of man and woman in terms of virasat?
There was a scholar/activist named Ghulam Ahmad Pervez in 20 century have a lots of books published by Talooa-e-Islam Trust and have many lectures about wrong Islam(fabricated) vs good islam(pure in Quran) on video sharing websites mostly on youtube also talked about Allama Iqbal vision mostly.
If you read or listen about him, What is your(Dr. Taimoor Rehman) take\comment\opinion about him?
Thanks sir
Sir I listened your all five lectures and I think that we must keep a balance between new philophies and Islamic laws. Imams before 13th century interpreted islam according to the demands of their eras. So, Iqbal has rightly said that we must understand and interpret Islam once again according to our era's demands because Islam is a complete code of life!
Allah Almighty has completed DEEN. There is no need of more teachings. Quran will keep showing miracles till QAYAMAT!
I disagree with yours and JADIDIAT PASAND's views about Islamic laws about women, judgements and all others you talked about in your lectures. I think, we have interpretations to understand those laws!
Western economic and judicial system is disaster for us. If it would have been workable, there would not have been so much of interest system. Nawaz Sharif and Musharaf would have been punished for their crimes. Western judicial system allows you so many things and is soft for a lot of crimes. We must implement Islamic laws.
Thank u very much for presenting these valuable lectures. I've learned lot of things regarding Shari'a and jurisprudence.
Sir kindly respond to these questions thanku!
1.Can the socio-economic and criminal justice system of Pakistan be improved through proper implementation of rules and laws as prescribed by Islam?
2. Through the system of zakat the social imbalances can be soothed?
Maturity varies person to person. Kuch log chalis sal k ho k bhi mature nahi hote. Puberty achieve karne ke chand sal ke andar shadi ki badolat zina se bachne Ka bahaut chance ha. Ye zina wali bt liberals bhool jate hain
Sir. Please study ghamidi sahb .all points you said are not belongs to islam .these are belongs to the religious thoughts of muslims. Please reply thanks
Need more content on this topic. Islamic Presidential System ka aaj kal naam buhot chal raha hai uss pe bhi kuchh bataden
Bas zaroorat isbat ki hai ke aap jesey qabil log agar is medan me kam karen to koi shak nai ke hum jadeed qawaneen bana saken jis ki Bunyan Islam ke usool hon.
Ha ek baat ye zaroor kahunga k aap tamam jiddat pasando se acchi zaban rakhte hai aur umeed karta hu k acchi soch bhi rakhte honge,
Is liye aapse guzarish karunga k shaikh hamza yusuf k kuch lactures ko sune wo ek American hai jo 14 saal ki umra me musalman hue the kyuki mujhe lagta hai wo western culture ko ham hind o pak ke logo se zyada jante honge to aap ko kuch nai baat sunne ko mile.
Mai unke aksar lactures sunta hu.
Allah ham sab ko hidayat de aapka bhai india se 🇮🇳
Ap kis ke favour kren gy? Jadeedeat pasendo ke ya phr rawaytii logon ke ya phr 2ono ko mix kuch jadeed kuch rawaetii????
Modernists.
👌👌 well done sir ❤
Comrade USSR ke education ,employment , internal external trade ,constitution par bhi lectures banaiye.aapke samjhane ka tarika bahut umda ha.ho sake to hindi me bhi lectures banaye. Lal salam from india
Bn chuke hein
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
@@mubashirharal9789 Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
Sharia k 4 source hain
quran , sunnah, ijma aur ijtihad
Hazrat Muhammad( S.A.W) ne kaha tha k jab mere baad koi msla aye ga jis ka hal quran aur sunat se na mila tou kya kro gay jis par jawab dia gaya tha k " ijtihad". Allama iqbal ka bhi yehi point of view tha k agr ijtihad ka process hi ruk gya tou sharia law apni true sense mai nafiz hi ni ho sakta
Mali ya jani nuksan ke ilawa zehni aziat hoti ha uska Kia kare? I am talking in the context of freedom of speech. please answer
Islam sy pehly slavery baqaida aik institution ki hesiyat rakhti thi millions ki tadad me log jabri ghulami per majboor thy. Islam ny azad insano ki kharid-o-farokht per pabandi lagai jo aik inqilabi act tha. Slavery ki sirf aik surat jaiz thi k Medan-e-jang me jo qaidi hath aein wo slave ki hesiyat ekhtiyar ker jaty thy eski 2 wajoohat thein. Aik ye k jo Qaidi pakry jaty agar unhen azad ker diya jata tou wo dubara State k liye khatra bnty qk wo jangjoo log thy dusri wja ye thi k ghulam bna ker unki proper terbiyat ki jati thi unko ye moka milta tha k wo Islam ko qareeb sy dekh saken aur eska hisa bn saken State me shamil ho saken. yahan ye baat bhi ahm hai k har Qaidi ko ghulam nahi bnaya jata tha balky jo fidya ada kr saky ya koi skill sikha saky wo azadi hasil ker sakta tha. Jo haqooq Islam ny Ghulamo ko ata kiye kya wo us dour me kisi aur jaga ghulamo ko hasil thy? un haqooq ki puri aik fehrist di ja sakti hai jo ghulamo ko Islam ny diye. Jahan tk kanizon ka taluq hai wo qk apny Owner ki mukamal zair-e-kifalat thien es liye unsy jismani rishty ki ijazat di gai agar aesi bay sahara Females ko azad rakha jata tou wo zindgi kis trha guzartien unki kifalat kon krta? ye amal bhi aik trha sy unki protection k liye tha. ye sb Ghulam wo thy jo Medan-e-jang me hath ay unki settlement k liye Ghulami ko jari rakha gya qk ye possible nahi tha k aik dam sy ghulami khatam kr di jati. Ghulam ko azad kerny ki trgheeb, azad logon ko ghulam bnany per pabandi, Ghulamon k haqooq ye sb Islam k zaberdast iqdam thy.
Sawal:
Since most of the Muslim majority countries try to adopt sharia law in the constitution. Which Muslim majority countries you think are the most successful in adopting them in the best way, in modern terms?
Being a physicist i have undergone in depth studies of those fields that you take 100 percent predictable. Infact in physics if you could delve into reality the actual behavior of system is subjective not objective, for the measurement influences what you are seeing. a photon you use to see an electron disturbs his state. what you perceive in daily life is an average behavior. The point is what we see is always subjective and average not real behavior. it depends upon who is seeing and can not be free of subjectivity. Look the end is clear. Sun is gonna die. temperature gonna reach equilibrium where all universe is at same temp. stars gonna disappear in future leaving us no where. My personal opinion is who you are what you are following irrespective of that atleast follow ethical behavior which is average of all religions, people and socieites agreed by all. All are humans. Consensus is built up on ethics. it would take time to develop in other domains as well. Do not put tag of liberalism, conservatism, secularism to create differences. don't compare for wrong reasons. past can be true as can present,for present is gonna become past in near future. everything has a role in universe and diversity give rise to beauty. Instead of searching for perfection in this universe which itself is gonna end we need to find common point and accept diversaties as they are. As a muslim I don't find Islam antagonistic to anything. It is just our wrong perception.I have one solution. just like we do experments. why not we set all major models in perfect way to small domains covering few hundred people and small territories and try to analyze empirically then. I hope this would help to build consensus. as we science men do experiments in lab. let the states do their experiments and help them and in case if some problems arise work as a team to find the causes and solutions of those experimental modals. we can spend billion of dollars on a space ship. why can not we design artificially such modals and then compare them by certain parameters. when the people would see results they are themselves gonna build a consensus
Likin sir Allama Iqbal to hme itne ziada modernist nai nazar ate wo kehte the k "juda ho deen sisat se to reh jaati he changezi"
"Apni Qias araian aqwaam e maghrib se naa kr khaas he tarkeeb me qoum e Rasool hashmi
Is k ilawa mujhe ese lgta he k jese wo West ko pasand nai krte the. shaid unhon ne democracy ki bhi mukhtalif ki he so please make a comprehensive video on this topic ...and please make debate with Orya maqbool jaan. He often criticise democracy and West especially their family system and open sexuality.
you lost me at jurisprudence video, but was quite an interesting take
Islam has imah and qiyas which can help to resolve modern issues.islam has all solution.need to studry
Wa ji wa,
Respected Sir, please make a video regarding books in which we can study about Muslim Philosophers . And also do give review on those books. Sir there are not many books which discuss Muslim Philosophers in detail rather they are discussed in brevity for example in A C Grayling's book only twenty pages are given to Islamic Philosophers with minute details.So,your help is required in this matter.
Good job…!
lekin hum chaate hai, waise aap ke pass bhaut busy schedule hoga
phir bhi aap ak baar yaha visit kijiye
After your lecture I can analyse some people put efforts to take our u math for high standard. Some people doesn't like to change from theological aspect... Wat I think y they conflicts each other let's make all concept together and make some branches Dnt hate each other hates comes became our ummath didnt grow.. Ikthilaf make dis unity in the ummah..
Sir sources of Islamic law pr b lectures upload kr lo.
Modern system is always better.
Salam from Srinagar Kashmir -
Good effort.Learned some new bits from your lecture
The political system is the most debatable issue for Pakistan. The Local Government and other matters can be democratized. Then there should be a federal state. But we also need a Caliphate to protect the interests of all the Muslim states combined. Like nowadays, US is the defacto Caliphate of the western powers. There should be a powerful central Caliphate to protect the interests and rights of the Muslims/Islamic states all over the world.
We failed to implement any democracy and thrived under the dictatorships. The so called democratic parties are political monarchs themselves and no one is willing to empower grass root local government system. Our legislative, Executive, Business/Feudal and local Govt powers are all concentrated within our provincial assemblies only.
Sir you are a great scholar. I learn alot from your lectures but this lecture is not much convincing for you may have not knowledge in depth regarding islam.
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
Good
Nizaam Ka uper buhat se ahdees hia jis ko study kary.
The blasphemy law, as you have explained has nothing to do with the Islamic jurisprudence rather your views seems originates from the law in vogue in Pakistan...
اگر تقلیدِ بودے شیوه خوب/ پیغمبر همراه اجداد رفتے (غالب)
آپ کی معلومات اور سمجھ ویسٹرن علوم اور جدیت کے بارے میں بہتر ہے مگر دین کے بارے میں سمجھ کو امپروو کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔۔
آپ نے تمام اقساط میں اسلام کو جدید ٹرمنولجی کے تحت ڈفائن کرنے کی کوشش کی۔۔ یہی بڑی غلطی زمانے سے ہورہا ہے۔
جدید اصطلاحات کو کنارے کر کے دین کی اصطلاحات کے مطابق سمجھیں مسئلہ حل ہو جائے گا انشاء اللہ۔
wow
Ye baat agar koi India me kahega to use Nonsecular or Islamophobic kahenge
The freedom of speech was given by Umar Farooq (R.A). Do you know how much freedom he had given to his people to criticize him. The persians even throwed stones on him and threatened him even. Islam also doesn't allow falsely accuse people. Islam also doesn't allow to the character assassination of people. And what you said about Blasphemy Laws. Now in Pakistan the law doesn't say to see the intention of the person. But previous Islamic Jurists always see the intention of the person then give the judgement. Determination of intention has always existed in Traditional Islam. But now in so-called Islamic Republic of Pakistan the law is misused. So we need to stop the misuse and we need determine the intention of blasphemer.
If a British soldier rebel against his army and nation he will be punished. So this why if a Muslim leave Islam he actually has become a rebel if Islam. Abu Bakr Siddiq (R.A) punished the apostates. Was he wrong to punish them.
Another misinterpretation. Sir, men and women have equal status in society. But in family system their status is different just like a mother is superior than her child because she is mother. But in Islamic society men and women have equal status.
It is not the Ulema who say that it is our Prophet (peace be upon him) who siad that when a woman is a head of state that nation will be destroyed. Are you more intelligent and wise than our Prophet (peace be upon him).
How can you judge that a child of 13 or 14 years of age isn't mature. When Ayesha (R.A) said that a 9 years girl is a mature women and even the medical science also says that chil get maturity from the age 9 to 12, then who are you to judge that who is mature or not. You are not a doctor. When your western countries put age limit, then teenagers started their sexual life without marriage. Every year 1 million teenage girls become mother in America. Because they have sexual urge and they need to fulfill it. So I would allow if my daughter wants to marry at young if she likes a boy. But I won't allow her to live as friends which is un Islamic. I would marry her where ever she wants.
Are you liberals more wise than Allah. The laws of inheritance given by Allah has more wisdom than your opinions. A man has more financial responsibilities than women which is why boys get double inheritance. Man has to take the responsibility of his wife and children. If the you say that women should have equal share in inheritance than tell all women that they should take care off themselves. They should not be a burden to their husbands. They should have equal financial responsibility in family life.
Sr g agr islam itna mahdod ha to pher bani a islam ko alameen k ly rahmat bnane ka matlab kya ha
Sir aap philosphy nhi padty ho
Sir pls english bi use kia kre
Urdu mushkil words smjh ni aate
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
you did not put your perspective you talked about both thoughts, orthodox vs modernist ,please put a way forward in between these
سر لیکن جعفری مسلک میں اجتہاد کا نظام رائج ہے۔۔
Bhai Jan bhot mushkil ma nazar ayee but great control........
True.
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
You have described Allama Iqbal as a modernist and a seeker of Ijtihad. What is the matter?
Yes I have? I think he is very different from the traditionalist ulema.
Why can't we see the prophet to be a Man of his time.
Can see the restraints you are subjecting yourself to.
Good job.
Please critically analyse Holy Quran.1) Wether it qualifies as hate speech. More than 50% of its verses teach hate for the non believers. 2) It teaches discrimination on basis of faith as Hinduism discriminates on basis of birth.
Does it "mainstream" & "normalise" hate and discrimination
گریٹ لیکچرز
Assalam o Alaikum*
ابے اسلام جدید ہی ہے اور یہ مرد اور عورت اسلام میں برابر ہیں ان دونوں کی ساخت کی وجہ سے یہ فرق نظر آتا ہے جو انکی طبیعت کے لیے اور صحت کے لیے بہتر ہے
اسلام میں غلامی جائز ہے لیکن پسندیدہ نہیں
اگر کوئی شخص قرآن کا غلط مفہوم سمجھا تو یہ اس کی اپنی غلطی ہے نہ کہ قرآن کی ۔۔ ڈاکٹر صاحب کو بہت سےمعاملات میں یہی مسئلہ ہے ڈاکٹر صاحب نے قرآن کا کی بات بنا دی جو کہ ملا ازم تھا اگر قرآن خود پڑھیں تو شاید یہ مسئلہ نہ ہو
Nato k head s poch gya tha USSR khtam hogya ab Nato ki kia zarorat hy to unho ny kha tha our next target is Islamic fundamentalist
sir ap k sary parta mai ne sun liye mgr.... ap Islamic laws or moderns laws ki bat karty han to aik bat ap ko zror note karni chaheya k islam kabi bhe in quality pa base nai karta AP farma rhy han k islam mai orat k hoqoq nai hai to ap ko elam hoga k orat ko izzat islam ne dia es se phaly Arab mai orat k 7 kia hota tha ap ko maloom hoga lehaza agr orat ki haq ki bat ho to islam he wo phla religion hai jes nai orat k hoqoq dryaft keya.
AP dakh lain AJ bhe Europe mai orat k kia hoqoq han ap agr only Pakistan or America ko comparison kary to ap ko pta chaly ga k hmary han orat ko ketni izat de jati hai.ap ne bat ki k orat ko gawa mai mard k equal nai kia islam ne to es mai yea logic hai k orat jazbati hoti, orat jald pegal jati hai or orat os trah nai soch sakhti hai jis trha mard soch sakta hai. AP ne kabi yea suna hai k orat ne koey chez ijad ki ho? nai na q k orat present time k elawa etni gehrai se nai soch sakti hai .
yea mera point of view tha agr ap ko bura laga to mozerat
Ap na buhat se foreign loogo Ka hawala Diya....per ap na ik hawala bi ahdees ki rohe se Nahi Diya......jis se nazar ata hia k ap Ka apna point of view Kia hia.....
Blasphemy laws insaniat ke Name par aik bohat hi bad numa dhaba hain Jin ka na koi Islami talimat aur na hi jadid insani values see mutabiqat rakhta hai
Fateh mecca me chand kafiron ko kaba ne qatal Kia gaya tha jiski waja blasphemy thi
@@qa2623 Kahan par parha hai ye? Kiyon tum logon ko masoom insanon ko qatal karne ka itna shauq hai. Quran, Hadees aur sunatee nabwi see ye sabit nahin hai balke haqiqat is ke barax hai yani Nabi Pak ne apni tohin karne walon ko koi saza nahin di aur nahi sahaba karam ko is ki ijazat di. Ye sab tumharee jahil, fasadi aur din firosh Mullon ne bad mein ijad ki hain.
اللہ ﷺ مکہ مکرمہ میں تشریف فرماتھے کسی نے حضور سے عرض کیا: (آپ کی شان میں توہین کرنے والا ) ابن خطل کعبہ کے پردوں سے لپٹا ہوا ہے آپ ﷺ نے فرمایا اسے قتل کردو (صحیح بخاری ،باب دخول الحرم و باب این رکز النبی ﷺ الرایہ یوم الفتح ، الصارم ا لمسلول علی شاتم الرسول ،) عبد اللہ بن خطل مرتد تھا جو رسول اللہ ﷺ کی ہجو میں شعر کہہ کر حضور ﷺکی شان میں توہین کرتاتھا ۔ اس نے دوگانے والی لونڈیاں اس لئے رکھی ہوئی تھیں کہ وہ حضور ﷺ کی ہجومیں اشعار گایا کریں ۔ جب حضور اکرم ﷺ نے اس کے قتل کا حکم دیا تو اسے غلاف کعبہ سے باہر نکا ل کر باندھا گیا اور مسجد حرام میں مقام ابراہیم اور زم زم کنویں کے درمیان اس کی گردن اڑا دی گئی ( فتح الباری ، باب این رکز النبی ﷺ الرایہ یوم الفتح )۔ اس دن ایک ساعت کے لئے حرم مکہ کو حضور اکرم ﷺ کے لئے حلال قرار دیا گیاتھا بیت اللہ سے صرف چندقدم کے فاصلے پر اس کا قتل کیا جانااس بات کی دلیل ہے کہ گستاخ رسول باقی مرتد ین سے بدرجہابدتر ہے ۔پوری انسانیت کویہ بات اچھی طرح معلوم ہونا چاہئے کہ ہر مسلمان کے دل میں حضور ﷺ کی محبت دنیا کی ہر چیز سے زیادہ ہے
@@qa2623 Sirf un logo ko qatal kya jo riyasat se baghawat krty aur law and order ko kharab krty. Agar aap kisi ka nuqsan na kro to aap kuch bhe krty rho kehny mein kya jaata he bhai. Kya farq parhta he. Blasphemy laws incomplete aur outdated hen yeh logo ko marny ka acha tareeqa he tauheen ka ilzam lgado bux.
5:06 yaar john lock ne to irtedaad ke law ko defend kiya hai aap kya baat kar rahe ho !?