Little disclaimer; Unfortunately, you cannot select an engine type in the flight simulator. What incident should the next video be about? Leave it in the comments! Did you like this video? Then please leave a like. You can subscribe via this link - www.youtube.com/@aviationaccidents?sub_confirmation=1
One of my best friends works for United as a flight mechanic, and during 2018 he worked at SFO. I shared your video with him and he was astounded at your level of detail about the whole incident. Well done!
Good job by the pilots but this is well within most pilot's capabilities. As an airline mechanic of 26 years, an engine producing no pressure combined with that much vibration, it would be immediately clear to me that the problem was an "uncontained engine failure," which would call for an immediate shutdown of the affected engine. It took them a minute to process it, no fault on them, but they eventually got there. If the engine causes too much vibration it is designed to break away from its engine mounts/wing to keep from damaging the wings aerodynamic lifting capabilities. It was a good deal of luck that larger pieces from the fan didn't tear through the fuselage, injuring passengers and causing the plane to decompress at altitude. All in all, It was a good day. 👍
I truly appreciate what pilots go through because I had a commercial drivers license. Driving a semi is obviously different than piloting an airplane. But these two transportation industries are heavily regulated by The Department of Transportation. Hours worked wise and many other ways to insure public safety regarding operating heavy machinery. A trucker can work for 11 hours in a 24 hour period. No more! Pilots are similarly restricted in hours worked by DOT. I always had respect for what I was driving. A potential missile barreling down a crowded freeway? You betcha. Brake failure is a reality man. Gotta be ready for that possibility when driving. Don’t be afraid to use runaway truck ramps fgs! Knowing how to take over or override something that goes awry while driving is crucial. Even autopilot disengages when crap goes sideways. Gotta be ready to assume control of the machine, man. Those conveyances have the potential to kill many as observed. Therefore the heavy governmental restrictions imposed upon the industries.
I built racing engines and raced cars for about 15 years. I know the stress on car engines at the high RPMs (Rotations Per Minute) they turn for racing and the damage it can cause on the internal parts. So on these plane jet engines that turn 100 times the RPMs it's a mystery to me how they hold together for so long. I have decided to walk or drive where I want to go from now on...
I know I'm being nitpicky but why is he explaining to us the takeoff process like disaster is going to strike? "As it reached the necessary speed, Paul pulled back on the control column, lifting the nose. The rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway." Yeah, that's how planes fly.
Yeah, my thoughts as well. Why add pointless commentary and spoil a great video. I also understand that as planes fly away the departing airport disappears.
@@Hughes500 as the plane flys away the departing airport does not disspaear, It leaves your view. Giving the illusion of dissapearing. But it is still there. You are just farther away. Clearly you dont understand. dumby. This is sarcasm heh.
@@Hughes500 Otherwise the video would have gotten rather short. One engine lost at a safe altitude, no other damage apart from aerodynamic drag on the right side, all instruments still displying correct values (except AP and AT stopped). To handle such situations is what pilots are trained for. I don't see the absolute nightmare here.
Keep in mind that unlike the illustrations used in this video, the engines in question were NOT GE90 engines. I'm sure GE isn't thrilled using this footage while describing issues with a Pratt and Whitney engine.
I’m a 71yo Veteran and a retired pilot. I flew many times across the Atlantic and Pacific. I believe if you’re crossing an ocean you should have a 3rd. engine. We flew a Dassault Falcon 900EX which had 3 engines. Maybe that’s why I’m still here at 71yo.😅
Thanks! I'm currently busy with the next video. In it, we get to the point more quickly. This was the first video, so it's also a bit of trial and error!@@dapje2002
You will be surprised. My buddy did barrel rolls with a Cessna 172. Now he is flying 737s commercially. I still remember the day when we were upside down. He even did it twice. I'm surprised he could focus because we were screaming the entire time.
YES VERY LUCKY. I DONT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANY PLANES CRASHING AS I DONT GET ON ANY, ANYMORE, I BECAME SCARED OF THEM ONCE I GOT INTO MY MID TO LATE 40S. I OFTEN HAVE DREAMS OF PLANES COMING DOWN THEN I HAVE TO RUN FOR IT. ITS NICE TO SEE SOME OF THESE PLANE CRASH VIDEOS TURNING OUT LIKE THIS ONE, NO ONE WAS INJURED.
I was on this flight with my wife and to be quite honest, we were never in really serious danger thanks to the flight crew and their professionalism. We actually enjoyed the rest of our Valentine's in Hawaii.
That’s reassuring I’m a Flight Attendant my self and that’s something they train us to maintain our professional and to reassure the passengers. I’m sorry you went thru such events
I like these stories if everyone survives and isn't seriously injured. But your the first passenger I get to say "Yay!" to. God bless you and yours, and God bless amazing pilots!
@@MisakiBlossom thank you so much. Thankfully and honestly I didn't really worry because i felt that the pilots knew what they were doing and the flight crew looked calm. I tried to think it was going to work out but of course you never know.
Well done. One small litle nitpicky detail. It's stated that the airplane was powered by P&W 4077s. "77" indicates the engine's maximum output at sea level on a standard day is 77,000 pounds of thrust. Those were on the "A" models. Then it's said that when the captain advanced the #1 engine, it was putting out 90,000 pounds of thrust. That would be a 4090, which powers the "B" models. I was a United captain flying 777s mostly on the polar route SFO - LHR. I often wondered what I would do if that same thing happened at midnight over Greenland. Happily for me, nothing like that ever happened.
That's how all plane crashes occur. A routine flight turns into a nightmare. It rarely has a happy ending either. These passengers were incredibly lucky.
Actually most accidents are just engine failures and crashes mostly light collision on ground or runway overrun so I'd consider maybe a 55 to 70% chance of a good ending
Bizarre dramatic wannabe poetry narration style and amateur phrasing... [4:54] and on and on... "the rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway..." 🤣 "Rear wheels" on an airliner? You mean the main [landing] gear!
Hi! Thank you for your feedback! This is the first video on this channel, so I'm still figuring out the right mix of writing style. Do you think it doesn't fit the video? I will definitely take this into account!
@@Aviationaccidents less drama more factual to the point and not a bloomy ornamented poetry! Listen to some well done documentaries and reports. For example Mentour and quite a few others trying to cash in on this and many other stories.
@@Aviationaccidents I think it was more like that effectively the rear wheels are always the last ones to leave the runway, so it was kind of like a stating the obvious, rather than the style of narration I think
This is an incredible video with amazing narrative techniques. Hope to see many more videos in the future! Glad to have met this channel upon it’s first video.
The narration exhibits much more emergency than really existed. Professional job by the crew. Less than professional documentary…or docudrama, as it’s portrayed. Why would they only have one shot at this landing?
Almost 50% of all passenger aircraft in the sky today are Boeing made. Ofcourse they are going to have a major share in air crashes. That's basic conditional probability. There have been plenty of Airbus crashes as well.
There are a lot of unnecessary information and things just said for dramatic effect that could be removed. Tell the story from a factual standpoint and it will be great. If not, it just becomes a National Geographic documentary that’s just shit to listen to.
I'm sure you are aware you have your work cut out for you, competing with the top aviation incident channels (I assume you know who they are) and satisfying their fans. There is always room for new channels topic, as the number of aviation incidents is limited, and there is a point where a channel has covered all the incidents that are suitable to make a video about. However, the bar is VERY high, satisfying the spoilt fans that have binged through all of the top channels' content in no time. As one of these spoilt fans, I will give your channel a try! But make sure you remain on point and remember you are not writing a script for a NG 'documentary' or something like that. 5 mins into the video and it's really hard to stay involved, as the pace is very slow while the information density is extremely low. Even those unfamiliar with the subject can deduct that a pushback vehicle is a sturdy one, and phrases like 'The rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway and with that, the aircraft became air borne' are very close to an insult to viewers' intelligence. Perhaps you are going for a more 'poetic' angle, which is not my personal cup of tea, but to each their own. But either way, if you are going for that, the creative writing aspect leaves significant room for improvement at this point. I hope you are able to take my criticism (and subscription) as an investment on my part into your channel, and I'm looking forward to videos that are binge worthy! Best of luck!
Hi! Thank you so much for taking the time to share your opinion with me. Personally, I think there's always room for new channels, provided they have their own style. I'm trying to do things a bit differently than the others. And whether that works out well? Only time will tell. This is the first video on this channel, and I've already received a lot of feedback, which I will definitely act on! I would find it valuable to get in touch with you. You can find my contact details in the description of this channel. Thanks again, and I hope you remain a loyal viewer!
@Aviationaccidents, hey, thanks for your thoughtful response! I appreciate the invite to get in touch. Unfortunately, the channel details did not show any contact info. Perhaps it's because I'm on my phone, but I'd say YT should show all info regardless of what device you are on. If you can provide me with an e-mailaddress that would be great. Or Facebook. I don't use X or Insta.
You really went into detail about how one engine was a big problem to fly the aircraft, but it can fly just fine with only 1 engine. That's a safety regulation, I believe.
How did acrobatic flying in the past play any role in this event? He did a great job but some of the video was a bit overdramatic and 99% of the pilots at UAL should be able to handle such an event.
At 16:08 , did you just said that Boeing certified the engines with Al alloy cowlings and then changed said cowlings material to composite?🤔 Without recertification! 🤯 Is this correct? Did you also say, that P&W dismissed the inspection findings as “paint issue” at 15:33? Whoa really encouraging for USA passengers!
Juan Browne at the Blancolirio Channel on YT has a riveting interview with Captain Benham about this incident. A must watch. This is an excellent shorter video about the incident, but the interview with the Captain really drives home how serious this was and what remarkable skill and determination he and his crew had that day to keep this from being a real disaster
Narration sounds so official that I'm wondering if its from a documentary or AI. Interesting video evertheless, If you enjoy air disaster channels give 'green dot aviation ' a try, the best on YT imo.
To be honest, nearly all the pilots these days are highly professional And have a bundle of experience. If they can possibly land that plane they will no matter what it takes. Like this incident and the boeing door plug a while back. The only time they actually crash is when they cant control the aircraft atall like jal 123. Very sad accident that was , but lessons are always learned thats why flyings never been safer.
The narration was, here and there, a little flowery, taking away from the main thrust and purpose of the exercise. Most of the passengers must have been beyond terrified given the enormity of the bang and the continued violent shaking of the aircraft. Planes are - and have to be - incredibly strong to be able to withstand such savage assaults on their structures. We take for granted the skills of flight ctews but thus lot can be proud that they acted with consummate professionnalism. I assume there was little to no diffuculty in rerpairing the bird and returning it to service.
Find it eerie how this misfortune happened to a United plane with flight number 1175 when everyone knows what happened to United 175… at least 1175 had a happy ending
Cycle recording is not intended to track engine time but rather the number of times the fuselage expands due to presurization. This is wear and tear on the fuselage panels and rivets
Final report On June 30, 2020, more than two years after the incident, The NTSB determined the probable cause(s) of this incident to be: The fracture of a fan blade due to P&W's continued classification of the Thermal Acoustic Imaging (TAI) inspection process as a new and emerging technology that permitted them to continue accomplishing the inspection without having to develop a formal, defined initial and recurrent training program or an inspector certification program. The lack of training resulted in the inspector making an incorrect evaluation of an indication that resulted in a blade with a crack being returned to service where it eventually fractured. Contributing to the fracture of the fan blade was the lack of feedback from the process engineers on the fan blades the inspectors sent to the process engineers for evaluation of indications that they had found.
Oh my gods, they were testing new tech with passengers & cabin crew who had not consented to this? Is this the Boeing way way? I'm so going Airbus only.
@@Aviationaccidents so, I went ahead and subscribed to see how your channel will grow. There's a big following of aircraft accidents. Keep on keeping on.
Very good. You should start by covering the well known accidents or maybe even ones that aren’t well known. I’m impressed with content and quality. Great job.
BTW, every ETOPS flight takes into account these "worst case scenarios". ETOPS means "Extended Twin-engine Overwater Operations Performance Standards".
Sigh. The airplane is NOT going to stall at 245K! In a twin jet if we lose an engine at cruise altitude yes, we use "drift-down" soeeds, the best lift over drag and it's calculated by the FMS computers. This narrative is a bit over the top dramatic
A "cycle" can also refer to the airframe. That is one takeoff and landing "cycle". The engines are often started, on the ground, then shut down without actually flying. Maintenance run-uos, and taxiing for instance
@@Aviationaccidents Well, now that you mention it, when you said "turned the left aileron on", it didn't sound right to me, maybe you could say turned the yoke to the left instead
![ได้เวลา! พาน้องแฝดฉีดวัคซีนครบ 1 เดือน🫣 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.52 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IzeLtaXBLNE/mqdefault.jpg)
Little disclaimer; Unfortunately, you cannot select an engine type in the flight simulator.
What incident should the next video be about? Leave it in the comments!
Did you like this video? Then please leave a like. You can subscribe via this link - www.youtube.com/@aviationaccidents?sub_confirmation=1
ana's a350 accident at tokyo
United 232, Alaska 261,
Air canada 797
Jal 123
Well then it is the manufacturer of said flight simulator to get their facts right doh!!!.
One of my best friends works for United as a flight mechanic, and during 2018 he worked at SFO. I shared your video with him and he was astounded at your level of detail about the whole incident. Well done!
Wow, I'm speechless. Thanks! ❤️
That Captain is a prime example of the kind of individual you want to have in the cockpit.
Sure thing!
Glad he wasn't Malaysian.
Good job by the pilots but this is well within most pilot's capabilities. As an airline mechanic of 26 years, an engine producing no pressure combined with that much vibration, it would be immediately clear to me that the problem was an "uncontained engine failure," which would call for an immediate shutdown of the affected engine. It took them a minute to process it, no fault on them, but they eventually got there. If the engine causes too much vibration it is designed to break away from its engine mounts/wing to keep from damaging the wings aerodynamic lifting capabilities. It was a good deal of luck that larger pieces from the fan didn't tear through the fuselage, injuring passengers and causing the plane to decompress at altitude. All in all, It was a good day. 👍
Thanks for the video
Our pleasure!
Subscribed, keep them up! Great work
Thanks! ✈️
Excellent narration..feels like im reading a book.❤
Thank you so much 😀
I truly appreciate what pilots go through because I had a commercial drivers license. Driving a semi is obviously different than piloting an airplane. But these two transportation industries are heavily regulated by The Department of Transportation. Hours worked wise and many other ways to insure public safety regarding operating heavy machinery. A trucker can work for 11 hours in a 24 hour period. No more! Pilots are similarly restricted in hours worked by DOT. I always had respect for what I was driving. A potential missile barreling down a crowded freeway? You betcha. Brake failure is a reality man. Gotta be ready for that possibility when driving. Don’t be afraid to use runaway truck ramps fgs! Knowing how to take over or override something that goes awry while driving is crucial. Even autopilot disengages when crap goes sideways. Gotta be ready to assume control of the machine, man. Those conveyances have the potential to kill many as observed. Therefore the heavy governmental restrictions imposed upon the industries.
Thanks!
Thanks mate! Really appreciated!
I built racing engines and raced cars for about 15 years. I know the stress on car engines at the high RPMs (Rotations Per Minute) they turn for racing and the damage it can cause on the internal parts. So on these plane jet engines that turn 100 times the RPMs it's a mystery to me how they hold together for so long. I have decided to walk or drive where I want to go from now on...
I know I'm being nitpicky but why is he explaining to us the takeoff process like disaster is going to strike?
"As it reached the necessary speed, Paul pulled back on the control column, lifting the nose. The rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway."
Yeah, that's how planes fly.
Yeah, my thoughts as well. Why add pointless commentary and spoil a great video. I also understand that as planes fly away the departing airport disappears.
@@Hughes500 as the plane flys away the departing airport does not disspaear, It leaves your view. Giving the illusion of dissapearing. But it is still there. You are just farther away. Clearly you dont understand. dumby. This is sarcasm heh.
@@Hughes500 Otherwise the video would have gotten rather short. One engine lost at a safe altitude, no other damage apart from aerodynamic drag on the right side, all instruments still displying correct values (except AP and AT stopped). To handle such situations is what pilots are trained for. I don't see the absolute nightmare here.
Thanks for maximizing information and minimizing noise and rhetoric.
Thanks for your reply Andrew!
Keep in mind that unlike the illustrations used in this video, the engines in question were NOT GE90 engines. I'm sure GE isn't thrilled using this footage while describing issues with a Pratt and Whitney engine.
Please see the pinned comment
I’m a 71yo Veteran and a retired pilot. I flew many times across the Atlantic and Pacific. I believe if you’re crossing an ocean you should have a 3rd. engine. We flew a Dassault Falcon 900EX which had 3 engines. Maybe that’s why I’m still here at 71yo.😅
Glad you're still here! :)
I do NDT testing for Pratt and Whitney !!
Hey man! How do i reach out?
Via e-mail, check the bio of this channel.
Even with minimal “actual footage,” the narration was on point. How does this channel have less than 2k subscribers? It was well done.
Hi! Thanks mate!
@@Aviationaccidents you are going to do well my friend. Congrats on your first video
Thanks! I'm currently busy with the next video. In it, we get to the point more quickly. This was the first video, so it's also a bit of trial and error!@@dapje2002
Probably because of the awful music. I had to stop watching.
Because its crap
What a hero this pilot was. And how wonderful he knew how to do acrobatic flying.
Was pilot a Veteran AF Aviator.?
You will be surprised. My buddy did barrel rolls with a Cessna 172. Now he is flying 737s commercially. I still remember the day when we were upside down. He even did it twice. I'm surprised he could focus because we were screaming the entire time.
YES VERY LUCKY. I DONT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANY PLANES CRASHING AS I DONT GET ON ANY, ANYMORE, I BECAME SCARED OF THEM ONCE I GOT INTO MY MID TO LATE 40S. I OFTEN HAVE DREAMS OF PLANES COMING DOWN THEN I HAVE TO RUN FOR IT. ITS NICE TO SEE SOME OF THESE PLANE CRASH VIDEOS TURNING OUT LIKE THIS ONE, NO ONE WAS INJURED.
I have to be honest, the pilot seems a good deal more competent than the others featured in this series. His skill was amazing!
I was on this flight with my wife and to be quite honest, we were never in really serious danger thanks to the flight crew and their professionalism. We actually enjoyed the rest of our Valentine's in Hawaii.
That’s reassuring I’m a Flight Attendant my self and that’s something they train us to maintain our professional and to reassure the passengers. I’m sorry you went thru such events
@@BryanTheeStallion thanks for your service. I hope you never have to go through something like this.
I like these stories if everyone survives and isn't seriously injured. But your the first passenger I get to say "Yay!" to. God bless you and yours, and God bless amazing pilots!
@tesstikles3225 thank god you all are okay. I wouldn't be able to breathe from the panic.
@@MisakiBlossom thank you so much. Thankfully and honestly I didn't really worry because i felt that the pilots knew what they were doing and the flight crew looked calm. I tried to think it was going to work out but of course you never know.
Well done. One small litle nitpicky detail. It's stated that the airplane was powered by P&W 4077s. "77" indicates the engine's maximum output at sea level on a standard day is 77,000 pounds of thrust. Those were on the "A" models. Then it's said that when the captain advanced the #1 engine, it was putting out 90,000 pounds of thrust. That would be a 4090, which powers the "B" models. I was a United captain flying 777s mostly on the polar route SFO - LHR. I often wondered what I would do if that same thing happened at midnight over Greenland. Happily for me, nothing like that ever happened.
PW returned a damaged blade, back into service. Not Boeing's fault at all.
Correct
Spoiler alert
No it wasn't boeings fault it was another shit American companies fault.
Gained certification using one material, aluminium, and then changed to carbon fibre? How did that get through?
@@kevinmoffattI don't think it be like it used to be. There is still enough paperwork get lost in, but the minds involved are weaker.
❤I thought this was very well done. Like the presentation and voice of the narrator.
Thanks! 😃
Excellent job on this video. The narration was clear, concise and really pulled you in as a viewer. Very informative, can’t wait to see more from you!
Thanks!
That's how all plane crashes occur. A routine flight turns into a nightmare. It rarely has a happy ending either. These passengers were incredibly lucky.
Actually most accidents are just engine failures and crashes mostly light collision on ground or runway overrun so I'd consider maybe a 55 to 70% chance of a good ending
@HarlequinBuckeye
That's like saying that an aircraft always crashes when it is flying.
Fatal crashes are actually the rarity
@@j.kelley1685
Oh, well, you would know, since you're such an expert.
Loads have a happy ending. More often than not.
This is like a high quality film series!!! Keep making more. They're really well done. Next topic, suggest making a video about Fedex Flight 705
Thank you! :)
Bizarre dramatic wannabe poetry narration style and amateur phrasing... [4:54] and on and on... "the rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway..." 🤣
"Rear wheels" on an airliner?
You mean the main [landing] gear!
Hi! Thank you for your feedback! This is the first video on this channel, so I'm still figuring out the right mix of writing style. Do you think it doesn't fit the video? I will definitely take this into account!
@@Aviationaccidents less drama more factual to the point and not a bloomy ornamented poetry! Listen to some well done documentaries and reports. For example Mentour and quite a few others trying to cash in on this and many other stories.
I liked the phrasing of the narrator. A pleasant change from other stereotypical narrations.
Thanks!@@pocho689
@@Aviationaccidents I think it was more like that effectively the rear wheels are always the last ones to leave the runway, so it was kind of like a stating the obvious, rather than the style of narration I think
Loved it, I did not took my eyesight from the screen for one minute, it was intense, because I put my self in the plane and I was shaking.
Wow!
This was excellent. Please don’t change your narrating style. It sets you apart from the others on TH-cam. Looking forward to more.
Thanks Kimberly! :)
Great job
Wow. Now that's good narration. The narrator really pulled me into the scenes.
Thanks! :)
Almost like poetry 🙌🏾
@@Aviationaccidentsi was about to say the same thing. Amazing job!
🤩@@stuffstoconsider3516
Really?
Excellent work. I look forward to more. And superb airmanship during this flight emergency.
Thanks!
Thrilling twist of fate? Nothing like a mid-air emergency to bring you closer to your loved ones.
I enjoy the colorful dialogue
I'm not sure I would be ready to get on a plane home though 😮
@@juliemanarin4127 u could try walk back to SFO !!
15:45 so if test shows no issues, its all good. if it shows issues, its probably a false positive. so then just dont test haha…
I absolutely love how you described the takeoff. Poetic.
Interesting but your illustration was off because you showed a general electric engine not a Pratt & Whitney in the illustration
Unfortunately, you cannot select an engine type in the flight simulator.
This is an incredible video with amazing narrative techniques. Hope to see many more videos in the future! Glad to have met this channel upon it’s first video.
Thank you for your great reply!
I really really don't like flying and with manufacturers cutting corners this only makes matters worse
Salute to the entire crew.
Great to see that your channel is growing rapidly. I've binged all of the videos and very much enjoy your narration.
Me too! I think I'm addicted
There is no bathroom. Don't you mean toilet or lavatory? Too many Americanisms nowadays.
The narration exhibits much more emergency than really existed. Professional job by the crew. Less than professional documentary…or docudrama, as it’s portrayed. Why would they only have one shot at this landing?
Always a Boeing...
I was thinking the same thing before I saw your comment
Oh stfu. It was the engine that had the issue. A wizzair a321 almost crashed because of lack of engine oil. Nothing to do with the plane.
Almost 50% of all passenger aircraft in the sky today are Boeing made. Ofcourse they are going to have a major share in air crashes. That's basic conditional probability. There have been plenty of Airbus crashes as well.
I have seen many Airbus ones too
This was blade failure on the Pratt & Whitney engine, nothing to do with Boeing
There are a lot of unnecessary information and things just said for dramatic effect that could be removed. Tell the story from a factual standpoint and it will be great.
If not, it just becomes a National Geographic documentary that’s just shit to listen to.
Thanks for your feedback.
I'm sure you are aware you have your work cut out for you, competing with the top aviation incident channels (I assume you know who they are) and satisfying their fans.
There is always room for new channels topic, as the number of aviation incidents is limited, and there is a point where a channel has covered all the incidents that are suitable to make a video about.
However, the bar is VERY high, satisfying the spoilt fans that have binged through all of the top channels' content in no time.
As one of these spoilt fans, I will give your channel a try!
But make sure you remain on point and remember you are not writing a script for a NG 'documentary' or something like that.
5 mins into the video and it's really hard to stay involved, as the pace is very slow while the information density is extremely low.
Even those unfamiliar with the subject can deduct that a pushback vehicle is a sturdy one, and phrases like 'The rear wheels were the last to lose contact with the runway and with that, the aircraft became air borne' are very close to an insult to viewers' intelligence.
Perhaps you are going for a more 'poetic' angle, which is not my personal cup of tea, but to each their own.
But either way, if you are going for that, the creative writing aspect leaves significant room for improvement at this point.
I hope you are able to take my criticism (and subscription) as an investment on my part into your channel, and I'm looking forward to videos that are binge worthy!
Best of luck!
Hi!
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your opinion with me. Personally, I think there's always room for new channels, provided they have their own style. I'm trying to do things a bit differently than the others. And whether that works out well? Only time will tell.
This is the first video on this channel, and I've already received a lot of feedback, which I will definitely act on!
I would find it valuable to get in touch with you. You can find my contact details in the description of this channel.
Thanks again, and I hope you remain a loyal viewer!
@Aviationaccidents, hey, thanks for your thoughtful response!
I appreciate the invite to get in touch.
Unfortunately, the channel details did not show any contact info.
Perhaps it's because I'm on my phone, but I'd say YT should show all info regardless of what device you are on.
If you can provide me with an e-mailaddress that would be great.
Or Facebook.
I don't use X or Insta.
Sounds like a reality show
i hve just sbubcribed to your channel vvery impressed with narrration,
Thanks! :)
The passengers were lucky they got brilliant pilots
With all due respect for both of the piolets.me personally i do not fly
Airbus videos: 100+ deaths
Boeing videos: cheers and applause
You really went into detail about how one engine was a big problem to fly the aircraft, but it can fly just fine with only 1 engine. That's a safety regulation, I believe.
How did acrobatic flying in the past play any role in this event? He did a great job but some of the video was a bit overdramatic and 99% of the pilots at UAL should be able to handle such an event.
these Pratt and Whitney engines are garbage, ge and rolls Royce were the only way to go
Git rid of the music. Or at least lower it.
Thanks for your feedback!
At 16:08 , did you just said that Boeing certified the engines with Al alloy cowlings and then changed said cowlings material to composite?🤔 Without recertification! 🤯 Is this correct? Did you also say, that P&W dismissed the inspection findings as “paint issue” at 15:33? Whoa really encouraging for USA passengers!
Juan Browne at the Blancolirio Channel on YT has a riveting interview with Captain Benham about this incident. A must watch. This is an excellent shorter video about the incident, but the interview with the Captain really drives home how serious this was and what remarkable skill and determination he and his crew had that day to keep this from being a real disaster
'Thrilling' at 1:30 means wonderfully exciting, great fun, really entertaining. The word you may need is 'terrifying'.
Best content and presentation regarding Air Disasters. Keep going, you have a faithful subscriber. Awesome 👍
Wow, thanks for your amazing reply! :)
Narration sounds so official that I'm wondering if its from a documentary or AI. Interesting video evertheless, If you enjoy air disaster channels give 'green dot aviation ' a try, the best on YT imo.
I just love the speaker's voice.
Its Hard to Grasp , that a 545000 Pound Object can get off the Ground and Fly.
To be honest, nearly all the pilots these days are highly professional And have a bundle of experience. If they can possibly land that plane they will no matter what it takes. Like this incident and the boeing door plug a while back. The only time they actually crash is when they cant control the aircraft atall like jal 123. Very sad accident that was , but lessons are always learned thats why flyings never been safer.
That pilot has to be one of the best in the world. Wow.
Great upload . Looking forward to more.
Thanks for your reply! Means a lot to me! 💪🏼
The narration was, here and there, a little flowery, taking away from the main thrust and purpose of the exercise. Most of the passengers must have been beyond terrified given the enormity of the bang and the continued violent shaking of the aircraft. Planes are - and have to be - incredibly strong to be able to withstand such savage assaults on their structures. We take for granted the skills of flight ctews but thus lot can be proud that they acted with consummate professionnalism. I assume there was little to no diffuculty in rerpairing the bird and returning it to service.
The captain is a beast
This channel is starting to take off
The narration is good, but the script reads like a high school report that requires a certain number of adjectives to be used.
Thanks for your feedback!
Can I use your video in my videos mentioning your channel in description
I will translate and make video in hindi language (India)
Hi. Please contact me via e-mail.
Find it eerie how this misfortune happened to a United plane with flight number 1175 when everyone knows what happened to United 175… at least 1175 had a happy ending
Cycle recording is not intended to track engine time but rather the number of times the fuselage expands due to presurization. This is wear and tear on the fuselage panels and rivets
Engine components expand and contract per cycle (heating & cooling), so he wasn't wrong.
Final report
On June 30, 2020, more than two years after the incident, The NTSB determined the probable cause(s) of this incident to be:
The fracture of a fan blade due to P&W's continued classification of the Thermal Acoustic Imaging (TAI) inspection process as a new and emerging technology that permitted them to continue accomplishing the inspection without having to develop a formal, defined initial and recurrent training program or an inspector certification program. The lack of training resulted in the inspector making an incorrect evaluation of an indication that resulted in a blade with a crack being returned to service where it eventually fractured. Contributing to the fracture of the fan blade was the lack of feedback from the process engineers on the fan blades the inspectors sent to the process engineers for evaluation of indications that they had found.
Oh my gods, they were testing new tech with passengers & cabin crew who had not consented to this? Is this the Boeing way way? I'm so going Airbus only.
@AlistairKiwi
Most people only prey to one god. How many do you prey to then?
Well, the first 8 minutes was usless
Ouch, thanks for your feedback!
@@Aviationaccidents so, I went ahead and subscribed to see how your channel will grow. There's a big following of aircraft accidents. Keep on keeping on.
Yet another Great Pilot I would love to have Fly any Plane I’m on anytime… Great job. And great First Episode!
the captain was amazing landing the plane god bless him amen
This is such a great channel
Thank you :)
Very good. You should start by covering the well known accidents or maybe even ones that aren’t well known.
I’m impressed with content and quality. Great job.
Thanks!
Single engine failure due to fan blade separation, no injuries reported
If said Boeing 777-200 was Pratt&Whittney powered ,how come there were General Electric Logos on the right engine cowling, answers on a postcard?.
Check my pinned reply! :)
BTW, every ETOPS flight takes into account these "worst case scenarios". ETOPS means "Extended Twin-engine Overwater Operations Performance Standards".
Hi Tim! Thanks for your feedback. Will take this into account!
Or: "Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim"
Just curious as to how they could apply reverse thrust with only one engine without veering off the runway.
@RayLomax1
The reverse thrust is counterbalanced by the flaps on the opposite wing to create wind drag.
This script and voice over is embarrassingly completely OVER THE TOP.
:(
When only one engine goes into reverse thrust isnt that like rowing with only one oar
Well done video & commentary ! More, please !
Thanks! Next video will come soon!
Was hard for me to understand the comment, music is much too loud!
Thanks for your feedback! Will take this into account.
On the contrary, I think the music and narration compliment each other!
@@carolball5764
Music is not a good thing when it overpowers the speech, and people can't hear what's being said; like so many videos do.
Sigh. The airplane is NOT going to stall at 245K! In a twin jet if we lose an engine at cruise altitude yes, we use "drift-down" soeeds, the best lift over drag and it's calculated by the FMS computers. This narrative is a bit over the top dramatic
Check 09:05 - th-cam.com/video/gFFq4Z0UNMU/w-d-xo.html, the NTSB Report on Flight United 1175. 'The aircraft began to buffet and to stall.'
A "cycle" can also refer to the airframe. That is one takeoff and landing "cycle". The engines are often started, on the ground, then shut down without actually flying. Maintenance run-uos, and taxiing for instance
Correct. A good example of the need of keeping track of airframe cycles is the Aloha Airlines cabin failure/decompression incident.
Pilot experience, along with a cool and calm crew, brought this plane in safely. Excellent.
I really liked the video, so you've earned a subscription from me
Thank you Luke! I appreciate that very much! Do you have any more tips?
@@Aviationaccidents Well, now that you mention it, when you said "turned the left aileron on", it didn't sound right to me, maybe you could say turned the yoke to the left instead
Thanks! @@lukethomas.125
What a long way of saying "the plane took off normally"
I’m taking this flight at least 20 times as the United Airlines employee and I am shocked at how accurate and real looking this is
OK everything but the interior 4:35
5:00 and the takeoff route…
Wow! Thank you for your reply. Some details may indeed vary slightly. But I have tried to recreate the story as closely as possible.
@@Aviationaccidents everything was perfect, thank you for your hard work
who is the commentator? awesome work love ll these vids
I like the way you tell the story, the grammar, intonation and choice of words are excellent
Thanks!
That flight crew is right up there alongside Chesley Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles. Incredible feat of courage and airmanship
please more more more when you get a chance .
🫡
@danielkamiot-priso6706
How do you like it?
Easy to listen to vid ❤
You've earned yourself sub! Your channel is going to do great and I can't wait to yo be there for all of iiitttt 🎉
Thanks Perry! 💪🏼
All commercial air planes should install cameras to monitor each engine .
I am clueless to why modern airplanes dont have cameras all over the plane
💰💰
Did the flight arrive on-time? That would be a real miracle!
Happy Ending. One of the few on these airplane disaster channels.