@@BobuxGuy Don't have to be an engineer to know two blade helicopters are noisy as hell, and the 8 blade ones are not. Making a weapon like this less noisy is high on the list of things is wants to be to last longer on a battlefield.
UAV might work on electricity or hybrid, in either case they are not environmentally friendly. The initial manufacturing has a big carbon footprint. Even if the source of energy is electric produced by Sun, air, hydro. The battery used on board is a huge guzzler in material consumption and power consumption.
Helicopters are VTOL. I understand you're probably referring to the ability of a fixed-wing aircraft that can utilize thrust-vectoring technology, but a helicopter is, by definition, a vertical takeoff and landing vehicle
@@jonnydemnutz7693 I guess if you go by orthodox terminology though that's not what people in the field will ever use to call a helicopter unless it has V-22/280 features
Unpopular opinion but I don't like drone warfare, recon drones and un-manned ground support vehicles so infantry don't have to lug around heavy gear, sure. If was in charge of a country I'd be pushing towards mechs rather than drones, heavily armored walker mechs with 2x20mm M61 Vulcans as arms, with 8 launcher hard points on each shoulder, 8 Aim9's on the left and 8 ATGM on the right, feet designed to absorb and protect from mines and IED's, Flares, chaff and ECM's to defend against incoming threats, ERA attached to 6mm Armox welded steel and Kevlar lining.
Wars should be fought by unpiloted mechs and drones and other unpiloted warcraft so that there are no human casualties. The winner and loser should then exchange non-land based goods upon completion of the war so as not to not disturb civilians.
I love mechs too. But they probably wouldn’t work, as they would be a huge target, and it’s not like they can repair a damaged leg on the field. Also, you have think about how we would transport them. Mechs would have more manoeuvrability, but when you’re fighting in close quarters or in a open field, you would be disoriented and it wouldnt matter. Plus you also have to think about how we would power such a mech. A mech would use lots of power. We need more advancements in energy before we can make mechs.
Rota blades are also noisy , and since it can only fly at an altitude of 10,000 feet it will be easy to short down.. once again a waste of the Petro dollar tunds
0:21 GARMOOSHA
First UAE Made VTOL Drone
🇦🇪
Masha'Allah
🇦🇪
Should use a 4 or even better a 8 blade prop to lower the noise out put.
k engineer
@@BobuxGuy Don't have to be an engineer to know two blade helicopters are noisy as hell, and the 8 blade ones are not. Making a weapon like this less noisy is high on the list of things is wants to be to last longer on a battlefield.
@@vonSchwartzwolfe its can operate at altitude of 10,000 feet do you think a helicopter can be heard at that height?
UAV might work on electricity or hybrid, in either case they are not environmentally friendly. The initial manufacturing has a big carbon footprint. Even if the source of energy is electric produced by Sun, air, hydro. The battery used on board is a huge guzzler in material consumption and power consumption.
U want this military device to be eco friendly?
The Navy already had a drone this a while ago
You can't just hijack the term vtol for the new toy copter in town.
There's a W I D E difference between a chopper and a vtol.
Helicopters are VTOL. I understand you're probably referring to the ability of a fixed-wing aircraft that can utilize thrust-vectoring technology, but a helicopter is, by definition, a vertical takeoff and landing vehicle
@@jonnydemnutz7693 I guess if you go by orthodox terminology though that's not what people in the field will ever use to call a helicopter unless it has V-22/280 features
@EnX High I concur. Just being specific. Assuming, from your vernacular, your in. Thank you for your service
Garmoosha not garmousha
Unpopular opinion but I don't like drone warfare, recon drones and un-manned ground support vehicles so infantry don't have to lug around heavy gear, sure. If was in charge of a country I'd be pushing towards mechs rather than drones, heavily armored walker mechs with 2x20mm M61 Vulcans as arms, with 8 launcher hard points on each shoulder, 8 Aim9's on the left and 8 ATGM on the right, feet designed to absorb and protect from mines and IED's, Flares, chaff and ECM's to defend against incoming threats, ERA attached to 6mm Armox welded steel and Kevlar lining.
Wars should be fought by unpiloted mechs and drones and other unpiloted warcraft so that there are no human casualties. The winner and loser should then exchange non-land based goods upon completion of the war so as not to not disturb civilians.
I love mechs too. But they probably wouldn’t work, as they would be a huge target, and it’s not like they can repair a damaged leg on the field. Also, you have think about how we would transport them. Mechs would have more manoeuvrability, but when you’re fighting in close quarters or in a open field, you would be disoriented and it wouldnt matter. Plus you also have to think about how we would power such a mech. A mech would use lots of power. We need more advancements in energy before we can make mechs.
Its just a remote helicopter. Why the advetise it so much. Every deliping countries can manufacturer a similar one
Rota blades are also noisy , and since it can only fly at an altitude of 10,000 feet it will be easy to short down.. once again a waste of the Petro dollar tunds
dynali H3
@3:05 "eco-friendly option for military operations" -- there ain't no such thing!
If you can see it, you can shoot it down.
Another toy for the boys to play with
I dont see the point in it. You could get a much cheaper drone to do the same job, probably better.
It looks like a toy
A copy of SAABs Skeldar!
Another Western made..
Father of Algorithm: *Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi.* Every hardware and software uses Algorithms.