BREAKING!!! Congress Defies Supreme Court Decisions To Force National Rifle & Armor Ban Bills!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.7K

  • @ArmedScholar
    @ArmedScholar  หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    BlackoutCoffee: www.blackoutcoffee.com/armedscholar
    Code: "ArmedScholar" for 10% Off

    • @LeonardoPisano-sn2lp
      @LeonardoPisano-sn2lp หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      We need those rifles for the 2nd American Revoltuion!!

    • @brittanykelm480
      @brittanykelm480 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Anthony is there a way to file against public office holders when they clearly take actions against enumerated rights as well as Court Precedence involving guaranteed rights?

    • @countrylover10101
      @countrylover10101 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Congress can not make unconstitutional laws.

    • @jamesm.4426
      @jamesm.4426 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He left all the things we need to ban stacked on the fence, but he also had a getaway car, so we need to ban those too.

    • @countrylover10101
      @countrylover10101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brittanykelm480 Only to the supreme court who the demonrats ignore.

  • @Yabroproductions33
    @Yabroproductions33 หลายเดือนก่อน +1897

    A felon does more felonies and the response is go after law abiding citizens… WTF?!

    • @MechanicalMafioso
      @MechanicalMafioso หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because it’s not the Felon they’re concerned with! It’s an excuse to accomplish an agenda of control.

    • @pedrowhack-a-mole6786
      @pedrowhack-a-mole6786 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

      Absolutely any excuse to disarm law-abiding citizens.

    • @davidbgooch9587
      @davidbgooch9587 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

      ​@@marilynreallon-ng2rithat doesn't even make sense

    • @FangFrenzy
      @FangFrenzy หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      @@marilynreallon-ng2riwanna try that again?

    • @johnjustice5595
      @johnjustice5595 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 y’all people don’t understand it’s not about the killings they can care less and about control what do you think comes nexts after they take your guns Germany, all over again history does repeat itself

  • @PaintballShyguy
    @PaintballShyguy หลายเดือนก่อน +2018

    Politicians wanting to ban rifles is the main reason we need rifles.

    • @theoryofpersonality1420
      @theoryofpersonality1420 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

      The constitution is to govern the government, not the people.

    • @uhsenli6424
      @uhsenli6424 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      all talks, there was an rifle ban back ih 1995 and no one did anything afterwards but sit back and listened

    • @kathieovercash8414
      @kathieovercash8414 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Truth

    • @techwatch1228
      @techwatch1228 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@uhsenli6424 That's funny because my father still had all his rifles and ammo. Everyone still had all their guns.

    • @stevenlarrabee3438
      @stevenlarrabee3438 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      @@uhsenli6424And it had no effect on crime

  • @raymondrodarte1678
    @raymondrodarte1678 หลายเดือนก่อน +1748

    If the government can't even keep one man safe why should we trust them to keep us all safe

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Our guns are legislated w 2a to "keep us safe".
      Our guns are fir us to use on govt that becomes tyrannical as the British were.
      Period.
      It's a dilemma.
      How to honor 2a?
      And allow guns to everyone?
      And yet stop mass & school shootings
      suicides, etc...

    • @stewarttomkinson3356
      @stewarttomkinson3356 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Can’t won’t

    • @zaknaifen193
      @zaknaifen193 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      The police CANNOT protect everyone, everywhere. When you are in a crisis situation and seconds count, the police are minutes (sometimes hours in Oakland) away.

    • @rickmcintosh1771
      @rickmcintosh1771 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zaknaifen193 Supremes say they are not obligated to protect us.

    • @EdiMeanG
      @EdiMeanG หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      @@zaknaifen193perfect reason for us to all Carry

  • @rlm9825
    @rlm9825 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    I'm SICK of our government.

  • @jeremyyoung7713
    @jeremyyoung7713 หลายเดือนก่อน +235

    They should ban murder and attempted murder. Oh wait...

  • @vick.9634
    @vick.9634 หลายเดือนก่อน +911

    The 2nd Amendment STANDS ....... PERIOD.

    • @backfromthedead553
      @backfromthedead553 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Well, that's nice talk. But can you walk the talk?

    • @annmarieblanc6363
      @annmarieblanc6363 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      @@backfromthedead553 It's actually You can talk the talk, followed by but can you walk the walk! Just Sayin'.
      Regards,
      Andy, Annmarie's husband.

    • @reginafetty6374
      @reginafetty6374 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Of course it does. It is not unlimited. There are restrictions on felons and mentally ill, and it is there to defend your home. It is not to go and unalive people just because you can.

    • @garyivy6875
      @garyivy6875 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you sound like a likely anti-gun nut!

    • @jsauerii
      @jsauerii หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, because the liberals who are already living WROL are worried about your empty keyboard threats or concerns.

  • @ednamac5186
    @ednamac5186 หลายเดือนก่อน +648

    So if all the bad guys have guns, stop trying to take guns away from the good guys

    • @Rick-fe8xn
      @Rick-fe8xn หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bad guys still had their rifles when they banned them a long time ago! It literally didn't stop shit

    • @southerndualsport3827
      @southerndualsport3827 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If our country ran on common sense, we wouldn't even be talking about this my friend.
      THEY SETUP THESE ATTACKS. THEY WANT TO BAN GUNS 100%

    • @richardfurlott4243
      @richardfurlott4243 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Left is too stupid to do ANYTHING else !

    • @FSAHT-FabianSocialistAcademicH
      @FSAHT-FabianSocialistAcademicH หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Only your enemy seeks to disarm you PERIOD. And blaming inanimate objects for the actions of lunatics is what OTHER lunatics/lunatic tyrants do.

    • @mondaysoffcloudg7010
      @mondaysoffcloudg7010 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Facts

  • @oo7-ro6bu
    @oo7-ro6bu หลายเดือนก่อน +318

    It has never been about saving lives. It has always been about disarming We The People.

    • @2manycatsforadime
      @2manycatsforadime หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      they still don't believe it which is the problem.

    • @beautucker6296
      @beautucker6296 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Exactly, we’re the only thing standing in the way of the government being able to do whatever they want without consequence. Naturally, they don’t like that.

    • @2manycatsforadime
      @2manycatsforadime หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@beautucker6296 this is being driven by the new world order, schwab, soros, obama and their cast of hundreds in our government which includes Clintons.

    • @miker7798
      @miker7798 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@beautucker6296
      It's not even that they don't like it. They have plans... they know what they want to do will ultimately be universally unpopular. Even with the majority of their own leftists...
      They are trying to disarm the population as much as possible before dropping the big one on us.
      Anyone who cooperates with any disarmament scheme after the last 20 years is absolutely insane.

    • @0onpoint
      @0onpoint หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      loxism.

  • @markg3289
    @markg3289 หลายเดือนก่อน +265

    The ATF is gay and needs to be dissolved! No one trumps my right to protect myself or family. Literally at the point of FAFO

    • @HermanDingleberry
      @HermanDingleberry หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh yeah? How do we do that?

    • @breakermorant2428
      @breakermorant2428 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really?
      Study more History.
      Study the Human Condition.
      Man's Laws ultimately will be defeated by Man's desire for Freedom.
      "If it Can be Conceived it can be Created."

    • @ViktoriousDead
      @ViktoriousDead หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      2A isn’t about defending yourself or your family

    • @courier4529
      @courier4529 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      ​@@ViktoriousDeadFrom tyranny, yes.

    • @StarHunter28
      @StarHunter28 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@ViktoriousDead literally exactly what it is.

  • @RandyBeretta-db5bg
    @RandyBeretta-db5bg หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Remember your oath.! Against all Enemies, both Foreign and "Domestic" 🤔

  • @rar15usa1
    @rar15usa1 หลายเดือนก่อน +297

    If they can sue gun manufacturers for third-party crimes. Then, we can sue auto makers for drunk drivers.

    • @psykoklown874
      @psykoklown874 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And politicians that get people killed.

    • @joshiewat
      @joshiewat หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Don't forget cell phone companies for texting and driving.

    • @PapaFenn
      @PapaFenn หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Lol cell phone companies for scammers

    • @Dat4valveGuy
      @Dat4valveGuy หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Sue McDonald’s for causing heart attacks

    • @jehemmerle
      @jehemmerle หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Sue the fed for allowing criminals to go free.

  • @mikeford963
    @mikeford963 หลายเดือนก่อน +473

    Holding the firearms manufacturers liable for criminal activities is like holding silverware companies liable for making people fat.

    • @greghardy9476
      @greghardy9476 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      LMAO if I’m not mistaken it looked like a Chinese SKS!

    • @mattfetter4123
      @mattfetter4123 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A so called social media model, was high and drunk , running 80mph in Miami . Running a traffic signal killing two innocent people.
      Sad , situation. But my remark was , why aren't they banning Mercedes for killing these folks?
      It's not the agenda!

    • @mikeford963
      @mikeford963 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@greghardy9476 Not likely. They aren't allowed Chinese guns in the US. Could have been a Yugoslavian, or Czech. And without detailed pictures, how could you tell the difference from a distance?

    • @NorCalDubber
      @NorCalDubber หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dead ass accurate

    • @Kool888
      @Kool888 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@greghardy9476 Norinco sks

  • @rieleyhill1253
    @rieleyhill1253 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    im sure a ban would've stopped someone from attempting to kill a former president. surely that individual has the utmost respect for all laws.

  • @wavegun
    @wavegun หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    When Politicians start tampering with the Bill of Rights, it is time to pay attention. These are YOUR Rights,, People!

  • @warlockcommandcenter
    @warlockcommandcenter หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    As with most Americans I do not recognize any Federal authority to regulate rifles or armor.

  • @steveriley1000
    @steveriley1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +249

    Why is no one asking the real question, trumps route was off schedule route , who is the mole in his security detail? Who is his security detail? Let’s start there

    • @timgoward9407
      @timgoward9407 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He spends a lot of time there, and he doesn't exactly travel with a small footprint. When Trump is in town, everyone knows. After that, just watch the golf course.

    • @ef2967
      @ef2967 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @@timgoward9407 That guy lived in Hawaii, makes 3k a month and is broke but somehow flew all over from Hawaii to Florida, to Ukraine etc, was able to get a car and an ak47 serial numbers removed, bullet proof armor and was able to sit there ready to shoot for 12 hours. He was told when and where to go and was funded. He was also involved with Black Rock just like the other shooter.

    • @Rhiorrha
      @Rhiorrha หลายเดือนก่อน

      Once again, this was someone who the FBI says is "on our radar". More and more, it's looking like that phrase is just the FBI slyly admitting that person is one of their assets, and is on their radar because they're on their PAYROLL. They'll stop using that phrase when people start figuring it out.

    • @FelineInTheTreeline
      @FelineInTheTreeline หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ef2967dude had a old ass sks ceramic tiles in a bag as armor dude spent maybe 2k geting there and on all of that stuff legit what are you talking about

    • @TheBeefSlayer
      @TheBeefSlayer หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@FelineInTheTreelineceramic tiles in a bag is exactly what the 82nd Airborne and the rest of the Army was issued before deployment to Afghanistan and Iraq. 🤷🏼
      What do you think a plate and plate carrier is?

  • @samwise6444
    @samwise6444 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

    PUT CONGRESS IN JAIL!!

  • @lunasakara7306
    @lunasakara7306 หลายเดือนก่อน +367

    Congress says I don't need a gun.
    I need more guns.

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Actually Congress blocked it, the Supreme Court is the one that tried to say we don't need them.

    • @efeaster3680
      @efeaster3680 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly

    • @0onpoint
      @0onpoint หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean sanhedrin.

    • @poncethegayboi
      @poncethegayboi หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump called the ak a bad gun

    • @B.E.st.
      @B.E.st. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm out buying two right now

  • @FoxtrotUniformCharlieKiloDemoc
    @FoxtrotUniformCharlieKiloDemoc หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    "AGAINST all enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC "!
    REMEMBER YOUR OATH .

    • @joepatriot6431
      @joepatriot6431 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The domestic enemy is running this country right now. Time to use the 2A with extreme prejudice.

    • @DanlowMusic
      @DanlowMusic หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Combine that with Marbury v Madison "All laws repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."

    • @MastaHosen
      @MastaHosen หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They don't care about their oath. They only say those words to get the job.

    • @nomore8042
      @nomore8042 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I very much do remember it and it has no expiration date either !!!!!!!@

    • @MastaHosen
      @MastaHosen หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nomore8042 you won't do anything

  • @clabertmenard5457
    @clabertmenard5457 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It was an SKS in an aftermarket Choate stock with an aftermarket extended magazine and aftermarket dust cover with scope rail.

  • @cweezy901
    @cweezy901 หลายเดือนก่อน +340

    Never waste a crisis.

    • @ArmedScholar
      @ArmedScholar  หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      The anti-gunners never waste an opportunity!

    • @bettersteps
      @bettersteps หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I thought the same thing.

    • @davidbgooch9587
      @davidbgooch9587 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeap 100%

    • @rickmcintosh1771
      @rickmcintosh1771 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidbgooch9587 That's why they pay all these flakes to shoot babies,

    • @kathieovercash8414
      @kathieovercash8414 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Of course. Like creating the situation to begin with.

  • @cam2ss1le14
    @cam2ss1le14 หลายเดือนก่อน +226

    Congress needs to uphold the constitution, period. Instead of looking at massive gun control, how about criminals actually be held accountable and sent to prison, in some instances, for life. This push to go after lawful law-abiding gun owners has to stop. Guns are not the issue!

    • @CBaer-1Mill
      @CBaer-1Mill หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Thanks and God bless you!

    • @DjentZilla
      @DjentZilla หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Congress, the President, SCOTUS. All of their jobs are to uphold the Constitution. 🇺🇸

    • @MarkFrost-zc5ne
      @MarkFrost-zc5ne หลายเดือนก่อน

      All I can think is they want crimes to happen that's why they have an open boarder it's so everyone including criminals can take over

    • @jkadude2010
      @jkadude2010 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@cam2ss1le14 I’d recommend they start with reading it. 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @miker7798
      @miker7798 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100%. They have been letting criminals off easy for years but under this crazy " justice dept." It's really off the rails. Parents are domestic terrorists for trying to protect their daughters from rape. White nationalists...ie conservatives... and climate change are the greatest threat to humanity...
      Greedy food stores are causing inflation...full sized Cadillacs should come with 4 cyl engines...and EVs are good for the environment.
      All just insane lies...
      They call evil good and good evil...
      Whats that tell us?

  • @failednone6070
    @failednone6070 หลายเดือนก่อน +421

    The right to keep to bear arms. The shooter has a criminal record
    “We the people” are not criminals

    • @presidentmerkinmuffley6769
      @presidentmerkinmuffley6769 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Hold that stance, and watch them continue to shift what is considered a "criminal" until you are one your self.
      Perhaps consider that it is a Natural Right, which we are born with, that no man has any right to take from you.

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I find it ironic that they're 'after shooters w criminal records'?
      To protect someone w a rather extensive and Felonius record.... ya kno?
      This pushes our nation further down the wrong lane in a 2 lane road... theres a bad head on collision that ma

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So wrong. Trumo *himself has a criminal record... yet we're supposed to support our govt going after a shooter BECAUSE HE HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD also? That's the other shoe?

    • @Fgway
      @Fgway หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Yeah banning arms wouldn't have stopped that guy 😔

    • @williamquackenbush6117
      @williamquackenbush6117 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Planned exactly the way they want. Major attempts on higher ups to push the agenda. No such thing as coincidence.

  • @californiagunner7020
    @californiagunner7020 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's an SKS modified to take a 30 round magazine.

  • @capt.raptor4650
    @capt.raptor4650 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    "nobody needs body armor! don't you know that stuff saves lives?"

  • @greglawson8106
    @greglawson8106 หลายเดือนก่อน +308

    Screw them

    • @ArmedScholar
      @ArmedScholar  หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      They will leverage any opportunity to push their agenda!

    • @modernretroradio993
      @modernretroradio993 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@ArmedScholar
      Including staging double-F's.

    • @reverendmorgano9659
      @reverendmorgano9659 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      @@ArmedScholar They overlooked the fact that the guy is a convicted felon who somehow acquired a gun illegally despite all the insane laws and restrictions that are in place. He is a criminal. Criminals don't obey the law. Their arguments are all rendered null and void by that.

    • @FutilityOfReason
      @FutilityOfReason หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@reverendmorgano9659 so what about the argument that felons should be able to carry? Aren't pro 2A folks saying they should still be able to access firearms after they did their time? Or is that out the window now?

    • @richardfurlott4243
      @richardfurlott4243 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      EXACTLY, my friend !

  • @swiftsprinter1
    @swiftsprinter1 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    Shall. Not. Be. Infringed. Period.

    • @Powder_actuated_lead-
      @Powder_actuated_lead- หลายเดือนก่อน

      And we will not 🫡

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They are "infringing" more and more by the day, soon you will have no rights left.

    • @jm329
      @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well. regulated. Period.

  • @younggunz0620
    @younggunz0620 หลายเดือนก่อน +321

    Why do they want us disarmed so bad? What do they have planned or want to do to us? Serious questions that need to be asked!

    • @PropsandWings
      @PropsandWings หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use your brain and you'll already know what they're up to. To give a hint, look at history and all those that disarmed their citizens.

    • @MegaCyberleader
      @MegaCyberleader หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      world domination

    • @PaintballShyguy
      @PaintballShyguy หลายเดือนก่อน

      Total control, one world order.

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      World Domination.

    • @pwd1679
      @pwd1679 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read the Communist Doctrine, there you will find your answers. And if you're still unclear, read Agenda 21, now Agenda30, then add a little WEF rhetoric, and maybe then you'll understand !!

  • @austinbel4557
    @austinbel4557 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The second attempt was an SKS in the poverty pony tapco chassis. He also didn’t have armor, it was ceramic tiles similar to flooring

  • @johnmartyn9018
    @johnmartyn9018 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For the algorithm and to say thanks for Al the info you bring to your audience.

  • @staceyswelding
    @staceyswelding หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    When will the Supreme Court just lay down the law!!!

    • @LexusGX460-OFF-ROAD
      @LexusGX460-OFF-ROAD หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's already "laid down" all it takes is anyone with an actual backbone to realize they have rights... the 🐑 🐏 🐑 will keep wondering if the have 2A rights when it's already written in the Constitution 🇺🇸

    • @Zwei22
      @Zwei22 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      They have. The problem is the supreme court just interprets and lays down law. They can't enforce it.

    • @LongDong-w3g
      @LongDong-w3g หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If they do that they won't have a job

    • @darknature79
      @darknature79 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Scumbag sheriffs are supposed to arrest these scumbags politicians doing this,but they won't.
      They're all on the same team.

    • @jb7483
      @jb7483 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They van just rule it is up to the executive branch to uphold. Please read the thing called the constitution.

  • @QiangQiangqiang-zt6nz
    @QiangQiangqiang-zt6nz หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    These politicians are BEGGING to get checked 🤬🤬🤬🤬

    • @swiftsprinter1
      @swiftsprinter1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. They are. They want civil war, they want destabilization of the U.S. Our constitution is the only thing standing in the way of United Nations and the globalists plan

  • @sg7914
    @sg7914 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Do not comply

  • @efreutel
    @efreutel หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Go ahead and “ban” them. I want to see all the bodycams when they go out to “collect” them. Bring out the popcorn.

    • @jm329
      @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No one is doing that. It is just stopping the sale.

  • @Altrag_
    @Altrag_ หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The reports say he was in possession of ceramic tiles in a backpack. Tile, like on your kitchen floor...

  • @almartin4284
    @almartin4284 หลายเดือนก่อน +183

    Whatever the government says we don't need or shouldn't have, WE WANT. When they ban anything, it becomes the duty of the people to refuse to comply.

    • @Pheer777
      @Pheer777 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Should you be able to own nukes?

    • @almartin4284
      @almartin4284 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Pheer777 Don't be a lefty nut job. Of course not. NO ONE should have nukes especially governments. They are not super beings. They are more closely related to tyrants.

    • @Bones2764
      @Bones2764 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes,if you can afford to maintain and store them safely. It is a weapon. There are laws in place for weapon safety.

    • @almartin4284
      @almartin4284 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bones2764 except a tyrant gets control.

  • @792slayer
    @792slayer หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Hell with that. I'm done complying with this nonsense.

  • @philwistrom9200
    @philwistrom9200 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    We will not comply!!!

  • @hiddentruth1982
    @hiddentruth1982 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It was an sks with a cheap polymer stock held by someone that would have never passed the background check.

  • @jadeskorpion1410
    @jadeskorpion1410 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brandon Herrera went over this, he confirmed it was an SKS. It's a bolt action rifle from WWII.

    • @3lyas134
      @3lyas134 หลายเดือนก่อน

      An sks is semi automatic

  • @forthewubwubs
    @forthewubwubs หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Firearms companies should refuse to sell to the government until they uphold the 2A. Watch how fast they would squirm to fix their mistakes.

  • @KrOnIc343
    @KrOnIc343 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    They didnt realize that this man wasnt even able to buy these weapons legally yet restrict law abiding citizens to legally buy guns? No logic right here

  • @philliptruong9130
    @philliptruong9130 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    Lol these people in congress are clowns lol

    • @dangerously72
      @dangerously72 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Communists....they're commies....pure and simple.

  • @keltingr2612
    @keltingr2612 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    An unconstitutional law is no law at all

  • @blindsquirrel7802
    @blindsquirrel7802 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Once again authorities were made aware of the situation before hand and did nothing.

  • @colbalt95
    @colbalt95 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Bruhh this guy was already a felon and was barred from owning them in the first place.

    • @792slayer
      @792slayer หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Apparently he had an armed stand off with the police, and had a machine gun with him. How the hell was he not under the jail for that?

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2a says no one is banned in any way from having a gun.*ONLY reason to own n bear arms is to use them on a tyrannical govt.
      Not for hunting, not for safety, not to keep your hone safe, ...
      To use on a govt that got bad as the British did. And as *ALL GOVTS are *prone to do.

    • @yodaddamilkman8422
      @yodaddamilkman8422 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@792slayerhe was working with the cia/fbi for years probably

    • @corinthiansdaniels3728
      @corinthiansdaniels3728 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@792slayer he had a felony for having a WMD wtf?

    • @yesiamarussianbot3076
      @yesiamarussianbot3076 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He lives on Hawaii, how did he get to Florida and then have this rifle, was it waiting for him?

  • @charliejohns9112
    @charliejohns9112 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    He used a car to get away, ban all cars.

    • @JonFox-t5x
      @JonFox-t5x หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They are working on that. 😡

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน

      It had an automatic transmission, ban all cars that are not manual single gear change per motion.

    • @Multimayhem45
      @Multimayhem45 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It was a stolen car on top of that. Ban all cars.

    • @charliejohns9112
      @charliejohns9112 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Multimayhem45 and improper plates. Ban all cars.

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He used his mind, ban all free will and decision making.

  • @Signal.Services
    @Signal.Services หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The SKS rifle used for the assassination attempt had no serial number and, therefore, was a "Black Market" gun, not purchased from a firearms dealer. Where and how did the shooter get it?

  • @tracystephens9104
    @tracystephens9104 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    According to what I have seen, the weapon is a PSL-54C. A rifle that is used by Russia and Yugoslavia. It is a 7.62 x 54 caliber round.

  • @farmgirl6866
    @farmgirl6866 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    And how will they ban them from Cartels hauling them through open borders, gangs and Illegals?

    • @demisx
      @demisx หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They care about millions of armed patriots. They care less about illegals.

    • @Im-Tired..
      @Im-Tired.. หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That doesn’t even include shipping containers from china and other countries that get sent in with firearms the only thing that would change is you’ll need to be more connected to get it but it will still find its way

  • @markivy3451
    @markivy3451 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Maybe laws should be made against anti gunners. Since theyre the ones who cause these people to act the way they do,by filling their heads with crazy non sense.

    • @rickmcintosh1771
      @rickmcintosh1771 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is a fantastic idea should be added to the Constitution- no more demon-crats and no more bi-cameral Congress.

    • @waynenace8326
      @waynenace8326 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There already is. If I not mistaken it was included in the original papers somewhere anyone trying to disarm Americans was to face executions. It's been a long time since I read that, but it's in the original documents.

  • @subjectiveone1937
    @subjectiveone1937 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Come and Take It!

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will bro. They will show up at your door with assault rifles and body armor...you aren't going to be able to contest them.

    • @subjectiveone1937
      @subjectiveone1937 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@alexmiller6848 Perhaps a coward like yourself wouldn't, but not everyone is weak and docile like you.

    • @Deadman62144
      @Deadman62144 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexmiller6848 They better bring many bags..

  • @WilliamCrum-gz3hx
    @WilliamCrum-gz3hx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @jar8459
    @jar8459 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Get everyone of these jokers out of office both the house and senate . We have to clean house people.

    • @Agent_Ice0
      @Agent_Ice0 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hard to do when two private organizations (political parties) control who gets exposure.

    • @jar8459
      @jar8459 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Agent_Ice0 US taxpayer Libertarian Green party you can even vote communist if you want but i would rather have a none of the above on the ballot.

  • @iknklst
    @iknklst หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I Will Not Comply.

  • @bryandamkaer3646
    @bryandamkaer3646 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    This has got to stop. Defying the SC should be automatic removal from position. Supposed to be the law of the land

    • @Agent_Ice0
      @Agent_Ice0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That works until A democrat gets in office and expands the supreme court to pack it with lefties that hate guns. Then magically with some word lawyering you interpret the constitution in such a way that you aren't allowed to own anything besides a muzzle loader...

    • @lunasakara7306
      @lunasakara7306 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If only passing laws against any constitutional right was an act of treason met with instant punishment... we'd have a lot less people trying to pass laws like this.

    • @barrettique
      @barrettique หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a constitutional right.

    • @AusarTheVile8916
      @AusarTheVile8916 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with you in this instance but I wouldn't say defying the SC in general should lead to removal just because if the SC passes something that goes against the Constitution and someone defies it to get our rights back then we would be shit out of luck so let's stay focused and specific and say defying the CONSTITUTION and Bill of Rights is treason

  • @jamescopeland5358
    @jamescopeland5358 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thx Anthony

  • @rosco1960
    @rosco1960 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, we should hold folks liable for miss use of vehicles, sporting goods, aircraft, etc.....

  • @davewhanger6722
    @davewhanger6722 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Hell NO!!!

  • @MossMusic777
    @MossMusic777 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Make sure to fight like a scholar too. We are up against a relentless enemy.

  • @lloydhaydel8029
    @lloydhaydel8029 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    They can’t ban anything, it’s in common use.

  • @charlieward5476
    @charlieward5476 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I have always been told to choose what hill you die on and the ability to keep my family safe is my hill

    • @jm329
      @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But this doesn’t have an effect on that. You can still use other things.

    • @charlieward5476
      @charlieward5476 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jm329 so you truly believe they will stop at taking rifles just like people said what gay people do in their own house is their business but now we have to give kids hormone blockers and accept drag queens in libraries because it’s story time

  • @jeremiahdelafuente4230
    @jeremiahdelafuente4230 หลายเดือนก่อน

    COME AND GET IT

  • @MoonMoon-gu2ge
    @MoonMoon-gu2ge หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I swear to follow and uphold the law to the same degree the government does.

    • @mikeyoshi7070
      @mikeyoshi7070 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣 Glad to see someone still has a sense of humor!!!

  • @stever5544
    @stever5544 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    The guy was caught with a machine gun in 2012. How was he not in jail for that?

    • @shawnbalch6046
      @shawnbalch6046 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wait...are you all of a sudden for gun control?

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2a.... we get to have guns? But its solely to use against govt.
      Think.
      If it's for hunting? You are living in illegal same as a mass shooter.
      Or a suicide by gun...
      See?
      2a => uninfringed for all.

    • @reginafetty6374
      @reginafetty6374 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@shawnbalch6046 Breaking the law with a stand-off with police is not gun control. I guess Steve doesn't get that you don't get life for breaking the law. It make take you 5 years just to be prosecuted to get 1 year in jail. Trump is the perfect example of that.

    • @leechtru
      @leechtru หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      10 years if the feds ever prosecuted him.

    • @flycatchful
      @flycatchful หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@reginafetty6374 Loser!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @bjty5615
    @bjty5615 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Bad guys will not obey any law only hurts the good people

    • @jm329
      @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s not the purpose of laws.

  • @robertjordan4755
    @robertjordan4755 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for the information its great

  • @richardlangel9954
    @richardlangel9954 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An excellent post and replies.

  • @bamikefoxtrot9001
    @bamikefoxtrot9001 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    They defy we defy

  • @vergil64
    @vergil64 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    gun control isnt about making communities safer. its all about giving the government carte blanch to "sardine pack" people they dont like

  • @fw3506
    @fw3506 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    There is already a law against stolen weapons. What do they hope to accomplish? I think we know what their ultimate goal is.

    • @Craig_N
      @Craig_N หลายเดือนก่อน

      They think if no one has guns then there won't be any stolen guns........ it's like banning cars to stop drunk drivers.

  • @EdwardSatterfield
    @EdwardSatterfield 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    We need to change out the congress and senate so we can get real Americans back in government

  • @diplexnormal3353
    @diplexnormal3353 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m not a political man myself and I’m not just a gun owner but a collector. I’m sorry to say this to the ATF but respectfully, I don’t have any plans of getting rid of my collection and no negotiation will ever make me say otherwise, even money. I worked hard to earn this collection of mine and I plan on passing it down if I will live to see it. and just so we’re clear, I know plenty of law enforcement in this state that are willing to die on the same hill that I’m on, so don’t get any funny ideas.

  • @HelplessTeno
    @HelplessTeno หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    I will not be giving up my property, ever. If you wanna take my property, good luck.

    • @whitechapel4261
      @whitechapel4261 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will easily take it from you if they feel like it.

    • @matthewshannon6946
      @matthewshannon6946 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Best of luck!!

    • @whitechapel4261
      @whitechapel4261 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewshannon6946 What kind of training do you have? Owning guns doesn’t automatically make someone capable of anything.

    • @kevinbaughman4207
      @kevinbaughman4207 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By a precedent set in the state of Texas, a person would have to receive compensation . They are talking about mandatory buybacks .

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol good luck? They will show up at your door with 6 heavily armed men with assault rifles and body armor. You won't be able to stop them alone.

  • @EricQuinn
    @EricQuinn หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    From the pictures I’ve seen it look like it was a sporterized SKS.

    • @davidowens989
      @davidowens989 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@EricQuinn I agree 100%

    • @Triste916
      @Triste916 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It definitely looks like a SKS.

    • @Zman14616
      @Zman14616 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Definitely, could tell right away by the gas tube.

    • @denisdegamon8224
      @denisdegamon8224 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It was.

  • @finn3408
    @finn3408 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    REVOKE ALL LAWS INFRINGING ON THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

  • @geecode5988
    @geecode5988 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Preach

  • @TheGrimFoot
    @TheGrimFoot หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Come and take it!!

  • @markgray8360
    @markgray8360 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    And this individual was on FBI radar since 2019! Wth?

    • @markivy3451
      @markivy3451 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Did they have dealings with this guy like the last one?

    • @markgray8360
      @markgray8360 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @markivy3451 they caught him with a WMD, and he got probation. 🤬🤬🤬

    • @reginafetty6374
      @reginafetty6374 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Isn't most of them that are mass shooters or assassins .

    • @rickmcintosh1771
      @rickmcintosh1771 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markivy3451 Highly likely.

  • @brandonthejobber3674
    @brandonthejobber3674 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I am at my wits end with these anti-gunners and those who want to take freedom

  • @nicholashodges201
    @nicholashodges201 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1:45 im glad someone else noticed that these "snipers" both used the *exact* type of rifle the grabbers want to ban. Almost like they're more interested in creating an excuse than actually doing the deed.

    • @JoeStill-un9gp
      @JoeStill-un9gp หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those were government orchestrated assassination attempts. 🙄 Duh

  • @Darkforces817
    @Darkforces817 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Shall not be infringed..............

  • @robertkoonce8365
    @robertkoonce8365 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    SCOTUS needs to do something quick, or we'll end up with a second NFA AMENDMENT. After 1934 , we've seen that if Congress changes the law, it'll take 100 years to contest it.

    • @elizabethy2912
      @elizabethy2912 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Our 2nd Amendment wasn't GIVEN by government- it cannot be taken away by them either!! Self-defense is a GOD-GIVEN RIGHT!!

    • @dabadore.
      @dabadore. หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@elizabethy2912 wasn't given by your imaginary friend either lol, "god given" yall are insane

    • @flyingmonkeydeathsquadronc968
      @flyingmonkeydeathsquadronc968 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dabadore. It's a right placed above the will of the people or the whims of the government, the power hungry freaks in DC and other capitols don't like that.

    • @dinadaughtry8993
      @dinadaughtry8993 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@dabadore.I'll bet my soul that there is a creator,if I am wrong I lose nothing but if I'm right I wanna be on his good side, what a miserable life to think that there is no creator and no meaning to life except for material wealth

    • @dabadore.
      @dabadore. หลายเดือนก่อน

      @dinadaughtry8993 dumb bet, since you lose your only life living it doing good things. But hey, you want to pray to imaginary stuff, you do your crazy stuff over there away from the rest of us, crazy.

  • @cmkeelDIM
    @cmkeelDIM หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    "..Shall Not Be Infringed." Anything is is an infringement. Including NFA, GCA, and Hughes.

  • @bjty5615
    @bjty5615 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Assault attempt does not equal loss of 2A rights... fbi suppose to being check before a purchase... he had a heavy criminal record

    • @kennethstaszak9990
      @kennethstaszak9990 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What makes you think the clown bought from a dealer?

    • @bjty5615
      @bjty5615 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@kennethstaszak9990 true

  • @captainbook3456
    @captainbook3456 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes

  • @TheColosiss
    @TheColosiss หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shall not Comply.

  • @DichDribbles
    @DichDribbles หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    THE RIGHT KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!! THEY AINT TAKING SHIT!

  • @themightycrixus1131
    @themightycrixus1131 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Every freakin time this comes up.... we should not be held accountable for other peoples' insanity.

  • @jeffbetts4254
    @jeffbetts4254 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This is more of a reason for us to be armed.

  • @trump45and2zig-zags
    @trump45and2zig-zags หลายเดือนก่อน

    Welding blankets and epoxy resin make very durable lightweight vest.

  • @jm329
    @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Isn’t it wild that after all these situations, people say the issue isn’t guns, it is mental health, but then don’t support more funding for mental health?

  • @markgray8360
    @markgray8360 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    And he was in a Blackrock commercial, as was Matthew Crooks.

    • @sedg03
      @sedg03 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh no.... well now we trumps is in loved those bad boys- to grab our guns?
      Not good...

    • @fortheloveofnoise
      @fortheloveofnoise หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really?

  • @thegoodlife2021
    @thegoodlife2021 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    I hope no Republican support this

    • @mikefarmer4748
      @mikefarmer4748 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      The RINOs will.

    • @shawnbalch6046
      @shawnbalch6046 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are always Republicans who support and enact gun control. Brandon Herrera was trying to run against one, but guess who got elected? Establishment politicians are apart of both parties.

    • @dirtyrotten2648
      @dirtyrotten2648 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I don’t trust any of them.

    • @Freespeechwar
      @Freespeechwar หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      People with guns protecting someone with guns, and people with no guns can't protect themselves with the people taking away guns who can't even protect themselves.. 🤔🤔🤔

    • @tjstevens001
      @tjstevens001 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would not surprise me!

  • @thejoker9201
    @thejoker9201 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    IF it defies the Supreme Court Then we are under no obligation to adhere to their illegal laws

    • @efeaster3680
      @efeaster3680 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Facts...

    • @unbreakable7633
      @unbreakable7633 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's funny. The Supreme Court not infrequently deserves to be defied. We currently have the worst Supreme Court in our history, all 9 nothing but political hacks appointed for their beliefs and not their knowledge of law or dedication to the Constitution. I have no faith in that court.

    • @tommyhunter1817
      @tommyhunter1817 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      EXACTLY. And you are OBLIGATED by the Constitution to resist by force.

    • @tyrannusspissamentum4423
      @tyrannusspissamentum4423 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about when the SC doesn't follow the constitution? I have faith in no human.

    • @tommyhunter1817
      @tommyhunter1817 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tyrannusspissamentum4423 Technically it isn’t possible for the SC to violate the Constitution as it is their job to interpret it. Whichever side gets 5 votes sets the interpretation.

  • @Incapacitator99
    @Incapacitator99 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good job!

  • @2023DodgeRam
    @2023DodgeRam หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just ordered a db10 308 yesterday. Currently waiting on it to show up to the dealer. Hopefully all goes well.

  • @goodcitizen64
    @goodcitizen64 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I as an American citizen demand only citizens vote in our elections, secure boarders, no more funding of foreign wars, term limits for all elected officials, strict abd severe penalties for any elected or appointed official that files a bill against our constitution, downsizing of our inflated government, and balancing the national governments budget! I will never surrender my firearms or 2A rights!

    • @mikeyoshi7070
      @mikeyoshi7070 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And they can restore the smith-mundt act as well. The government needs to be held accountable for the propaganda it's imposed on the US population.

    • @jm329
      @jm329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does that include Trump who said he wanted to go against the constitution?

  • @edhain1450
    @edhain1450 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    shall not be infringed time to ban any Government employee elected or not that took a oath to the constitution and doesn't follow the law the constitution and bill of rights ban them from any job in the Government jobs or any power to control any laws

    • @alexmiller6848
      @alexmiller6848 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you think the Govt is going to turn on themselves and start banning their own you're off your rocker.