Do you think particles have ever been arranged in such a way somewhere that these frames were the exact probability density function for a single electron or photon?
Pretty cool! though it's worth mentioning that light/dark is flipped. I've seen at least one other Bad Apple video that made the same mistake, and presumably plenty of others have.
Good catch. I tried the correct version (with matplotlib Greys_r color map) but discovered that much of the quantum fuzziness was washed out when it was white against light grey...
Beautiful simulation! I'm impressed that you managed to get it run in a reasonable amount of time on an ordinary computer -- that must be some good code!
judging by the fact that it sometimes goes fully black or fully bright, it looks like you didn't make the region outside of the video infinite potential.
Did you just make the potential bad apple, or did you try to find a potential that makes the probability density as close to the bad apple as possible?
Next weekend I might do a Schrödinger-Poisson version of the thing. I don't foresee many differences except the apple collapses into a black hole.
bad apple but it’s burnt into my retinas
I've been using the Magma palette in research for a few years and resonate ... it's burned into my retinae for sure
It's certainly burned in mine.
same case here. plz help
My vision after rubbing my eyes a little too hard:
cant wait for the doom bad apple collab
bad apple but I stared into the sun too long and now I only see ultraviolet and infrared
i audibly said "PARDON" and then found exactly what the title said, i don't know why i was surprised
Next: Bad aplle but Its running on the braincells of another human
Our entire universe is only created to run bad apple
Reimu may have taken some of Marisa's mushrooms...
Nice!
Its simultaneously bad and apple until you look at it, then its either bad or apple.
Havent watched this yet so its simultaneously the greatest and worst video ever
Do you think particles have ever been arranged in such a way somewhere that these frames were the exact probability density function for a single electron or photon?
Pretty cool! though it's worth mentioning that light/dark is flipped. I've seen at least one other Bad Apple video that made the same mistake, and presumably plenty of others have.
Good catch.
I tried the correct version (with matplotlib Greys_r color map) but discovered that much of the quantum fuzziness was washed out when it was white against light grey...
the internet is wild
Beautiful simulation! I'm impressed that you managed to get it run in a reasonable amount of time on an ordinary computer -- that must be some good code!
Bad apple is thankfully not very high-resolution :p
judging by the fact that it sometimes goes fully black or fully bright, it looks like you didn't make the region outside of the video infinite potential.
Please read the description. No infinite potential anywhere.
That's crazy, I didn't understand a single thing from the caption though..
Have you seen 1D Schrödinger equation before or am I the stereotypical scientist who assumes every contemporary human knows Hψ = Eψ
xkcd.com/2501/
@@FWPhys as a toddler i have yet to be educated about this, apologies for the lack of knowledge on this topic
My bare bones knowledge of quantim physics enjoyed this video
rule 86
Indeed.
Creo... Que eso no era azúcar...
Did you just make the potential bad apple, or did you try to find a potential that makes the probability density as close to the bad apple as possible?
I just made the potential bad apple.
can someone explain to me like I'm stupid what a quantum wavefunction simulation is
in this context, brighter color = higher chance to find a particle. Think of the Bad Apple drawing as walls to a room.
@@FWPhys oh ok
Soo tripy, I love it
It has artistically nontrivial moments I'd say, especially 1:40
Lemme know when generative AI can do this. Checkmate, tech bros.
sadly I am pretty sure this codebase was used to train Copilot.
Don't ever buy no weed from the gas station bruh
What’s the Hamiltonian tho
H(x,t) = ℏ²/(2m) ∇² + Bad_Apple(x,t)
Second thought my stabilisation trick made it an open system (time-dependent Hamiltonian) so slightly more complex ...
How long would be the video to explain this to someone that knows nothing about it?
Good question. I will attempt one day.