2022 Mitsubishi Outlander VS 2022 Haval H6 - Crash & Safety Tests

2022 Mitsubishi Outlander VS 2022 Haval H6 - Crash & Safety Tests
2022 Mitsubishi Outlander
- Adult Occupant Protection 83%
Adult Occupant Protection: 31.61 out of 38
Frontal Offset (MPDB): 5.59 out of 8
Full Width Frontal: 6.84 out of 8
Side Impact: 6.00 out of 6
Pole Oblique: 6.00 out of 6
Far-Side Impact: 3.00 out of 4
Whiplash Protection (Front): 2.18 out of 3
Whiplash Protection (Rear): 1.00 out of 1
Rescue & Extrication: 1.00 out of 2
- Child Occupant Protection 92%
Child Occupant Protection: 45.43 out of 49
Dynamic (Front): 16.00 out of 16
Dynamic (Side): 8.00 out of 8
Child Restraint Installation: 11.43 out of 12
On-Board Features: 10.00 out of 13
- Vulnerable Road User Protection 81%
Vulnerable Road User Protection: 44.20 out of 54
Head Impact: 18.54 out of 24
Upper Leg Impact: 6.00 out of 6
Lower Leg Impact: 6.00 out of 6
AEB VRU (Pedestrian): 6.30 out of 7
AEB VRU (Cyclist): 7.36 out of 9
AEB VRU (Backover): 0.00 out of 2
- Safety Assist 83%
Safety Assist: 13.35 out of 16
Seat Belt Reminders: 2.00 out of 2
Occupant Status: 1.00 out of 1
Speed Assistance System: 1.65 out of 3
AEB Interurban/Auto Emergency Steering (C2C): 2.70 out of 4
Lane Support System: 4.00 out of 4
AEB Junction Assist: 2.00 out of 2
2022 Haval H6
- Adult Occupant Protection 90%
Adult Occupant Protection: 34.22 out of 38
Frontal Offset (MPDB): 5.13 out of 8
Full Width Frontal: 7.20 out of 8
Side Impact: 6.00 out of 6
Pole Oblique: 6.00 out of 6
Far-Side Impact: 3.89 out of 4
Whiplash Protection (Front): 3.00 out of 3
Whiplash Protection (Rear): 1.00 out of 1
Rescue & Extrication: 2.00 out of 2
- Child Occupant Protection 88%
Child Occupant Protection: 43.55 out of 49
Dynamic (Front): 15.74 out of 16
Dynamic (Side): 8.00 out of 8
Child Restraint Installation: 11.81 out of 12
On-Board Features: 8.00 out of 13
- Vulnerable Road User Protection 73%
Vulnerable Road User Protection: 39.45 out of 54
Head Impact: 16.57 out of 24
Upper Leg Impact: 3.79 out of 6
Lower Leg Impact: 6.00 out of 6
AEB VRU (Pedestrian): 5.35 out of 7
AEB VRU (Cyclist): 7.79 out of 9
AEB VRU (Backover): 0.00 out of 2
- Safety Assist 81%
Safety Assist: 13.06 out of 16
Seat Belt Reminders: 2.00 out of 2
Occupant Status: 1.00 out of 1
Speed Assistance System: 0.90 out of 3
AEB Interurban/Auto Emergency Steering (C2C): 3.16 out of 4
Lane Support System: 4.00 out of 4
AEB Junction Assist: 2.00 out of 2
---------
Hope you enjoy this video and leave your comment bellow. To stay up to date with alot of new Videos
Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Follow us
Facebook : www. 4drivetime
twitter : / 4drivetime

[@4DriveTime]

Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications

[@eduitguy9016]

Is it just me. Or did the Haval do better in keeping the child within the car seat. And in the lane keeping tests the Havel didn't go out of the lines where the Outlander did?

[@marcelosanchezfebles9220]

Excelente por Haval saludos desde Argentina

[@jadilsonalvesdasilva7192]

Muito bom excelente 👏👏 parabéns pelo vídeo 👏👏👏 parabéns

[@kennedy9072]

I'd take the Japanese built Outlander, although the Haval isn't bad.

[@zhanhonglu903]

Ur stereotypes thoughts make U done the choice

[@ibtihazYousuf]

brother I have own 2 cars haval h6 and Mitsubishi Outlander

[@KnowTheNewOfficial]

Never try to compare any other brands with Japanese brand because Japanese brand always the best without any test without any doubt 👉💯

[@MRGELO555]

Hace 20 años atras era asi, ahora ya no.

[@nerrixj.l.6102]

Still living in 2000??? 😂

[@dec13666]

Outlander is USD 15K more expensive than HAVAL H6...
Top security at nearly USD 49K is THE LEAST JAPANESE GUYS MUST OFFER, keeping in mind that's pretty much everything 😂 (not automatic parking, not as much electronics, etc)...
🇯🇵 Was the tech king in 1980, nowadays 🇨🇳 is, deal with it 😎

[@DavidGonzalez-on2ly]

Dude you are paying almost double, lol, you have no brain to math or what

[@Pedro-nw7rv]

​@@dec13666I don't know. So far I think much tech also means more things to fail... I'm more practical. I prefer simple cars with simple engines and less risks of failures...