@@DonziGT230it’s not google we are talking about. It’s a storage shop which is probably a parking lot type of set up. Plenary small businesses use regular receipt books
I agree with the decision. In the criminal court case plaintiff should pay the defendant $2900 pain and suffering. LEO had witness testimony/video to arrest him. He's toast.
Not over, it is a still on but is a different format. Justic for the people. And none are scripted. You read too much fake misinformation on the internet.
Yeah but the plaintiff was arrested so LEO must have had witness statement and/or video. Now it goes to criminal court and restitution to the victim. If the plaintiff doesn't have a record then downgrade it to a misdemeanor but he must pay the victim $2900 (same amount as he got for his goddam car). Ironic justice eh?@@georgebenevides
The fact that the plaintiff says the drivers side door doesn’t open at the very beginning of the case Makes me question if the defendant caused the damage or was it damaged prior.
I don't trust either of these litigants. The defendant claimed the accident didn't cause any damage to the plaintiff's car even though the evidence shows otherwise. He doesn't actually come out and say the plaintiff had another accident and is trying to scam him, though, it's just, "Trust me, Your Honor. Don't believe your lying eyes." The plaintiff tried to slip in a DUI accusation but had to fall back on "The cops didn't ticket him because they felt sorry for him."
That's what I was thinking. It could have come from a different accident but he didn't say that. Glad he's more stupid than dishonest. Both are scummy people.
For the upcoming criminal case: 1. Plaintiff needs to receive car rental and storage- dock that off defendant's tab. 2. Judge needs to take into consideration the fact the defendant fled and tried to evade the accident. This is definitely a time a copy of this tape needs to to be shown to the criminal court judge to show how the defendant is.
I HATE to see 2 brothers going at it like this😢 HOWEVER he did hit his car being in a rush and impatient, and the plaintiff did punch that man🤦🏽♀️ and if he was truly about hurting him as he did; he would have never attacked that man BEHIND HIS BACK 😂 SO DONT BRAG TOO MUCH SIR ma'am 🤷🏾♀️
I think the plaintiff is a straight-up liar. But I think the defendant is delusional. He thinks he’s telling the truth but isn’t seeing reality correctly.
Maybe the defendant should also include slander in his civil suit to the plaintiff with all the drug accusations (if untrue). Plaintiff stupid by not keeping his mouth shut but seems he might not understand that because he seems to have a big mouth. Good luck with that fella.
I agree. The attack did happen and the plaintiff is in serious trouble. If there's store witness testimony and/or video then he's toast. Depending on his record he may serve time and obviously pay restitution (hospital bill, pain and suffering). If I'm the criminal court Judge I'd make it $2,900 the exact amount he got for his car as a message he'll remember.
A pathological liar ? Side note: Sugar doesn't disolved in gasoline but it makes a mess in the gas tank and filter, does not damage the motor. I'm a mechanic and know what destroys a motor, but will not share.
I think the plaintiff is a straight-up liar. But I think the defendant is delusional. He thinks he’s telling the truth but isn’t seeing reality correctly.
The plaintive said in his testimony that his door would not open before the accident. So it is my guess that the car was damaged before the accident. I think the plaintiff is lying and should get absolutely zero
@@FashionbyKyaExactly 😂 the Toy Car's door would not open and the tire fell off😂. The defendant seems a lil sketchy. He hit the man's car and should have paid. He got punched because that's how street justice goes. It's not always right but he knows how it goes...he's no fool..
There are a few points i want to highlight about this case and hopefully the more educated people on the law can weigh in: 1. Why didn't the judge ask for proof of registration and insurance from both parties? If the plaintiff did not have insurance, wouldn't his right now become a wrong? 2. Could it be the defendant was telling the truth and the vehicle had sustained the damage before the incident? What if the damage doesn't line up? 3. What was the color of the defendant's car? Was that the same color on the plaintiff's vehicle? The reason i ask this question is because the defendant was trying to speak and the Judge cut him off like she normally does with everyone. The defendant did not articulate his case properly.
I would’ve had dismissed everything I believe he hate that man and for that he shouldn’t have gotten nothing if you put your hands on me oh I’m not paying you nothing.
From now on, if someone asks you what happened, start by saying "3 or 7 days later" and act like it's normal. Apparently people can just say whatever now and it's perfectly fine to have words mean nothing.
I believe the plaintiff is a scam artist. Did no one hear where he said the door doesn't open on the drivers side of his car? Sounds like the damage was already there and that is why the door wouldn't open. I believe he even said it twice that the car door won't open
If the plaintiff's car was in perfect condition then why is it that his car door couldn't open when the police stopped him, right before the so-called accident, I have a feeling that the damage was already there and that he is a scam artist and I believe he sucker punched the defendant...
The plainitff @6:28. Your honor in his drug induced state 😫 all the while slurring in his alcohol induced state 😌 I really believe the plaintiffs hands aren't clean either all that stuttering sputtering and talking over himself. I hope the defendant gets his pay day for the assault.
How was the defendant going to say the dude came up and sucker punched him in the store,then in his testimony say that the defendant hit him with the board and split his head open. What was he even talking about?
I think both are a little off but I think the plaintiff is a liar. The defendant didn't present his case well either. I think the damages on the defendants car should've been shown as well. Who knows if those damages were already on the plantiffs vehicle. Also it was mentioned the plaintiff was driving without a license and insurance on that car but it wasn't brought up in the case. Although it wouldn't probably matter it can speak to the plantiffs character and thought process. I think the plantiff was looking for a way to get a new car and is lowkey scamming. The defendant seems very unsure of what really happened which is weird but his downfall was leaving that scene. initially.
i think they got it wrong they never showed the back of the car to see if there was damage ?? ...... plus if you listen to the testemony he said he asked the officer if he could park before the accident because his car door wouldnt open ?? ............ why not ??? ...... because the damage was already there
The damage is there before He said he can't open the door He has to go to the right door to exit The car I got One on you your ownership The kid is a no good I need an explanation for that
I am sure everyone watching/listening to this case was more intrigued by how the defendant sounded like Mike Tyson rather than the actual case, as was I. LOL The defendant is 100% guilty regarding the car accident & the plaintiff is 100% guilty of assaulting the defendant in a separate incident. Bout #2 is going to go to the defendant when his case finally goes to both criminal & civil court & so the plaintiff's adulation in winning his civil suit today is going to be short-lived.
Milian always is some type of way towards black people. She acts and behaves complete differently in front of us than she does others. Some things never change. Smh
I would’ve had dismissed everything I believe he hate that man and for that he shouldn’t have gotten nothing if you put your hands on me oh I’m not paying you nothing.
I hate when she complains about the quality of receipts but also tells people they could use a crayon and toilet paper
There's a big difference between the expectations of private parties and businesses.
@@DonziGT230exactly!
Good point @@DonziGT230
Right😂
@@DonziGT230it’s not google we are talking about. It’s a storage shop which is probably a parking lot type of set up. Plenary small businesses use regular receipt books
Glad the plantiff won. He definitely suckerpunched the defendant tho 😂
And I believe he put sugar in his tank 😂
@Mbheather88 see I aint wanna say that 🤣
I agree with the decision. In the criminal court case plaintiff should pay the defendant $2900 pain and suffering. LEO had witness testimony/video to arrest him. He's toast.
@@YukinaReign888 lol
@@YukinaReign888and he did 😂 he smirked when he mentioned the sugar! He did that.
Judge to plaintiff: Is he making that noise - like the Wicked Witch of the West?
🤣👍🏾 JM is hilarious! 😂👌🏾
I can’t believe this show is over 😭 I don’t like the new show. It seems scripted. I hate scripted court shows 👎🏼
Wdym it's over?!?
The new show is scripted. In an interview judge Milian says they’re reenacting real cases
@@SweatyNeckbeardgot cancelled along with Judge Mathis
Not over, it is a still on but is a different format. Justic for the people. And none are scripted. You read too much fake misinformation on the internet.
After watching the new People's Court I will not be watching it again. The show seems fake
Both of these fellas are outta pocket. They both seem like liars.
Agreed.
Defendant was hit over the head but said he didn't know he can sue for that. VERY FISHY.
Yeah but the plaintiff was arrested so LEO must have had witness statement and/or video. Now it goes to criminal court and restitution to the victim. If the plaintiff doesn't have a record then downgrade it to a misdemeanor but he must pay the victim $2900 (same amount as he got for his goddam car). Ironic justice eh?@@georgebenevides
The three of them look like drunks from around the way
That’s what I thought.
The fact that the plaintiff says the drivers side door doesn’t open at the very beginning of the case Makes me question if the defendant caused the damage or was it damaged prior.
He’s talking about the toy car they’re using
The toy goofy ! He's talking about the t.o.y. 😂😂😂😂
“Oh we actually have a police car!! Oh I love us” hahahaha JM is the best 😭🤣
Too old to be saying ambalamps🤦🏽♀️
The judge's look right after she signed off with, "But good luck with your criminal case," says what she thinks about that (4:40).
I have nothing but contempt for any individual that flees the scene of an accident....
I don't trust either of these litigants. The defendant claimed the accident didn't cause any damage to the plaintiff's car even though the evidence shows otherwise. He doesn't actually come out and say the plaintiff had another accident and is trying to scam him, though, it's just, "Trust me, Your Honor. Don't believe your lying eyes."
The plaintiff tried to slip in a DUI accusation but had to fall back on "The cops didn't ticket him because they felt sorry for him."
That's what I was thinking. It could have come from a different accident but he didn't say that. Glad he's more stupid than dishonest. Both are scummy people.
I have never seen so much lying in one episode from both parties.
🤦🏾♀️🤣
My favourite part is when they play Hot Wheels 😂
I love when they use the grocery cart😂
@@mrshappilymarried1 LoL I forgot about that one
For the upcoming criminal case:
1. Plaintiff needs to receive car rental and storage- dock that off defendant's tab.
2. Judge needs to take into consideration the fact the defendant fled and tried to evade the accident.
This is definitely a time a copy of this tape needs to to be shown to the criminal court judge to show how the defendant is.
He should get a rental while he is waiting for the adjuster to make a decision
The defendant walked in like " Oh snap , this where im supposed to be?
Plaintiff : "drugs do that to you after a while and make you believe things this aren't even real" lol
I HATE to see 2 brothers going at it like this😢 HOWEVER he did hit his car being in a rush and impatient, and the plaintiff did punch that man🤦🏽♀️ and if he was truly about hurting him as he did; he would have never attacked that man BEHIND HIS BACK 😂 SO DONT BRAG TOO MUCH SIR ma'am 🤷🏾♀️
Her Honor is a knockout.
Isn't it lovely when two idiots find each other in this world!
Apparently three, including Phillip 😂
They way you worded this 😂
Both are shady as hell.. and liars!!
And you know he gave Phillip $50 to stand as his witness 😂
I think the plaintiff is a straight-up liar. But I think the defendant is delusional. He thinks he’s telling the truth but isn’t seeing reality correctly.
If the plaintive is telling the truth about the assult charges, I'd go looking for any cctv footage from in store and out.
He shouldnt have won that disgusts me
The defendant has a menacing face, why is he looking like that?!😂 he "stolled" on him, huh?😂
He looks like he might be a wino or drug user
Maybe the defendant should also include slander in his civil suit to the plaintiff with all the drug accusations (if untrue). Plaintiff stupid by not keeping his mouth shut but seems he might not understand that because he seems to have a big mouth. Good luck with that fella.
I agree. The attack did happen and the plaintiff is in serious trouble. If there's store witness testimony and/or video then he's toast. Depending on his record he may serve time and obviously pay restitution (hospital bill, pain and suffering). If I'm the criminal court Judge I'd make it $2,900 the exact amount he got for his car as a message he'll remember.
A pathological liar ?
Side note: Sugar doesn't disolved in gasoline but it makes a mess in the gas tank and filter, does not damage the motor. I'm a mechanic and know what destroys a motor, but will not share.
c’mon we’re all people’s court family here. i need to get revenge on an ex, go ahead and share what will destroy a motor, you can trust me 😂😂
I think the plaintiff is a straight-up liar. But I think the defendant is delusional. He thinks he’s telling the truth but isn’t seeing reality correctly.
The plaintive said in his testimony that his door would not open before the accident. So it is my guess that the car was damaged before the accident. I think the plaintiff is lying and should get absolutely zero
no he was talking about the toy car
I am highly suspicious of the plaintiff. Fast talking and double-talking dude. Would loved to have seen him get nothing
@@FashionbyKyaExactly 😂 the Toy Car's door would not open and the tire fell off😂. The defendant seems a lil sketchy. He hit the man's car and should have paid. He got punched because that's how street justice goes. It's not always right but he knows how it goes...he's no fool..
Plaintiff*
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
The moment the defendant said his change was $18 ik the sucker punch story was true 😭😂
Plaintiff is an asshole for sucker punching the defendant
There are a few points i want to highlight about this case and hopefully the more educated people on the law can weigh in:
1. Why didn't the judge ask for proof of registration and insurance from both parties? If the plaintiff did not have insurance, wouldn't his right now become a wrong?
2. Could it be the defendant was telling the truth and the vehicle had sustained the damage before the incident? What if the damage doesn't line up?
3. What was the color of the defendant's car? Was that the same color on the plaintiff's vehicle? The reason i ask this question is because the defendant was trying to speak and the Judge cut him off like she normally does with everyone. The defendant did not articulate his case properly.
Agree with all 3 of your points. Especially that last sentence in #3
Said all the same things
He needed that grand opening 🙌 😂
The smirk, he out the sugar in there!
I don’t trust neither one 🤔
There she goes again with, "quien es mas macho"😂😂
Phil totally stopped moving his head! 😄
That's the most honest comment 😂😂 _"The evidence doesn't match up with my story"_ 😂😂
Unbelievable ! Why run after the accident.🙄
The defendant can get the money right back for that punch😅
Did anyone research the criminal case? I need closure 😂
I'm going to need a follow-up on the criminal case, please.
He said shout out 😂😂😂
He hit that man and he knows it.
On the one hand she’s saying any piece of paper and a crayon, but his invoice for storage wasn’t good enough?
How’s that fair that a cop is right there yet he doesn’t appropriately charge the defendant with fault, no insurance, or DUI?
She should’ve dismissed his whole case for punching him
That's not how the law works lol
This was a good case! 😂 I’m Glad the plaintiff won! Now it’s settled! 👏🏾👏🏾🔥🔥🔥
If the car has been totaled they are not going to pay storage fees. The plaintiffs story didn't match up with the photos of the damages.
The defendant slo
I would’ve had dismissed everything I believe he hate that man and for that he shouldn’t have gotten nothing if you put your hands on me oh I’m not paying you nothing.
Yes exactly
Doug is funny asf😂😂
I think they are both incredibly dishonest.
If these two couldnt tell the truth in a court of law and in front of the world. This case should be thrown out for perjury on both sides.
They both some liars case dismissed
Fight it out in the courtroom, not in the streets.
From now on, if someone asks you what happened, start by saying "3 or 7 days later" and act like it's normal. Apparently people can just say whatever now and it's perfectly fine to have words mean nothing.
Brian McKnight seems complicit too.
I think both of them are liars
@0:03 I was like "what is that on the mans head" I had to paus it to see....
Is fleeing the scene a felony if it's in a parking lot?! My car just got hit in a parking lot....and the loser took off.
3:40 The defendant wore a suit hoping to look more like an innocent man.
He absolutely hit that man
First he said he sucker punched him in the face then he started to say he hit him with a wooden something, which one was it? 🤔
Law doesn't excuse "panic"
The plantiff a fast liar, he know some of those damages was there already 😂...N defendant may need to lay off whatever he doing
I believe the plaintiff is a scam artist. Did no one hear where he said the door doesn't open on the drivers side of his car? Sounds like the damage was already there and that is why the door wouldn't open. I believe he even said it twice that the car door won't open
He hit that dude! He would’ve felt a little more if he didn’t hit him… I believe he smoked him.
IMO.....
Judge Judy would have been the better Judge, Judging this case.....
Plaintiff lied so much he actually believes his own lies...
You come to court in a nice outfit.....and then you don't tuck your shirt into your pants.....
He definitely hit him 💀 that guy is small he did that shit 😂
The plaintiff just ruined his whole case. He's going to round up owing him...
If the plaintiff's car was in perfect condition then why is it that his car door couldn't open when the police stopped him, right before the so-called accident, I have a feeling that the damage was already there and that he is a scam artist and I believe he sucker punched the defendant...
You’re basically agreeing with Ebony K Williams
The plainitff @6:28. Your honor in his drug induced state 😫 all the while slurring in his alcohol induced state 😌 I really believe the plaintiffs hands aren't clean either all that stuttering sputtering and talking over himself. I hope the defendant gets his pay day for the assault.
Why would his door not open (he said that at the beginning)? would that not imply that there was damage already?
I think he was talking about the door on the display car. Or maybe I misunderstood.
He was talking about the demonstration
@@danir6695 I was confused as well. Why would he mention it. Like dude get to the case. Judge probably didn't get it either.
Yeah I think that was a wrong verdict. Nothing was mentioned of his no insurance or license.
He was talking about the toy car for display
Nahimean, Money Earnin’ Mount Vernon, nahimean
How was the defendant going to say the dude came up and sucker punched him in the store,then in his testimony say that the defendant hit him with the board and split his head open. What was he even talking about?
Defendant not descendent....with that run on sentence.
🤣@@Mimi197-f2z
@@Mimi197-f2z it was voice to text man idk what to tell you. There I edited it to how it should have been
Anyone else think Mariska Hargitay and Judge Milian look so much alike?
This is unbelievable especially for Everton. They might basically be relegated...
what’d the plaintiff say coming out of the courtroom at the end? it sounds like they censored something
I think both are a little off but I think the plaintiff is a liar. The defendant didn't present his case well either. I think the damages on the defendants car should've been shown as well. Who knows if those damages were already on the plantiffs vehicle. Also it was mentioned the plaintiff was driving without a license and insurance on that car but it wasn't brought up in the case. Although it wouldn't probably matter it can speak to the plantiffs character and thought process. I think the plantiff was looking for a way to get a new car and is lowkey scamming. The defendant seems very unsure of what really happened which is weird but his downfall was leaving that scene. initially.
8:09 this poodle-doo lost the second he started with all these lies
I would’ve asked to see a picture of the car prior to the accident because he did say he couldn’t open his door
He was talking about the toy car door not opening.
Lol...omg! 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
Costumes
Plantiff is a clown..
i think they got it wrong they never showed the back of the car to see if there was damage ?? ...... plus if you listen to the testemony he said he asked the officer if he could park before the accident because his car door wouldnt open ?? ............ why not ??? ...... because the damage was already there
listen @ 2:12 .............
Lol.... he's talking about the model car, that's in his hand 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️
no because he says he asked the officer if he could get out of the car @@sugarbabysugarhoneyiced-t557
Here❤❤❤
Sugar in the gas tank is way old school. It completely damages the engine. Soooo yummy petty.
Scammm
The damage is there before
He said he can't open the door
He has to go to the right door to exit The car
I got One on you your ownership
The kid is a no good
I need an explanation for that
He meant the toy car, if you closely pay attention @2:35 he tries opening the door with his finger. Then says the door doesn't open.
Vote for Trump
MAGA 2024
I am sure everyone watching/listening to this case was more intrigued by how the defendant sounded like Mike Tyson rather than the actual case, as was I. LOL The defendant is 100% guilty regarding the car accident & the plaintiff is 100% guilty of assaulting the defendant in a separate incident. Bout #2 is going to go to the defendant when his case finally goes to both criminal & civil court & so the plaintiff's adulation in winning his civil suit today is going to be short-lived.
I want to See the comments. 😊
Milian always is some type of way towards black people. She acts and behaves complete differently in front of us than she does others. Some things never change. Smh
You. Are. Out. Of. Your. Mind.
She was completely fine with them. She was joking right along. Great attitude!
Stop bringing race into everything.
I mean, she may have her reasons.. she's been at it for a while. What are ya gonna do
I don’t see what you’re talking about at all. That’s a stretch!
I would’ve had dismissed everything I believe he hate that man and for that he shouldn’t have gotten nothing if you put your hands on me oh I’m not paying you nothing.