The family that came out and told the young man to "play" injured and "fake" like he's in pain is disgusting. Bad karma because it was probably the biker boy's fault.
Ughh I HATE when Milian calls herself using "urban slang" with Black litigants. She does it with no other race. She calls FULL GROWN OLDER Black women, "girl, honey, girlfriend" etc...but if a litigant DARE call her "miss" ...her tortillas get toasted??? #girlbye
I also hate when she has cases with black women about hair extensions and wigs and acts as if it’s soooo difficult to understand and act like they’re the only race that wear hair extensions
And throughout this case she called these grown men “bicycle boys” but I have heard her scold many male litigants for calling women girls. She can’t hide her own biases.
And that is the reason why I drive two to five miles per hour, slowly creeping along when my view is completely blocked by cars or other things in the road, because I can not see what's coming with the street being blocked......
Great point. The lack of it sunk any chance for the defendant. Was the biker at fault? Note: the Google Map "added" the yellow lane marker down the middle.
Defendant seems like a decent man. But one thing that bugs me about this day and age is calling 25 year old " kids" or " boys" , they're grown ass men!
The defendant should’ve been liable just for the fact that he was in that car with no insurance. The judge should’ve stressed that out bc people need to understand that you cannot drive a car with no insurance under any circumstance
Spanish teacher here - retired. The sequence to learning any language, naturally, is listening for comprehension. Speaking comes next. Then that's followed by reading and writing if you pursue it in school, or if your parents teach reading & writing at home. Spanish was my native tongue; I've been speaking it since I uttered my first words. Luckily, I grew up in a home where we were forced to speak Spanish... we had no choice. My mom introduced us to English only when my dad was at work from a very young age, so my siblings and I all became bilingual before we entered Kindergarten. But when dad was home from work, we all switched to Spanish only. He expected it of us, and there was no escaping it. It wasn't that he didn't understand or communicate in English, he just preferred that we stay fluent in Spanish since we'd be speaking in English at school and didn't need to worry about that. I'm grateful to my pops for instilling in me the importance of language and culture. He kept us close to our traditions, and my mom supported that. But because of them both, I became bilingual... first through listening, then through speaking when I was old enough to speak. Studying Spanish in college and getting a degree in it was just like buttercreme frosting on a cake - delicious. My parents gave me a solid foundation... studying my native language in college broadened my horizons. Teaching it was fun, but like some have mentioned, even studying it for 4 years in high school - if you don't use it, you lose it. And Spanish is such a practical language, I encourage everyone to learn it, or for that matter, any second language. It makes for open-mindedness with other cultures. Just my two cents. Not trying to pontificate.
My mom is like that. She grew up with Spanish being spoken in the home (her grandpa was from Mexico). She understands it perfectly but doesn't speak it. Or maybe she does and she's just never let me know that fact. HMMM.. Now Im thinking.
I love how the defendant's dress shirt still has the creases from the store. Just kind of endearing. Everyone seemed nice in this case; it was refreshing
But at least the defendant dressed for the occasion, it doesn't matter if he had just got the shirt from the store or not, he knew he had to go in there respectfully. There's a good possibility that since it's all done and said, the defendant could possibly have a case against the bicyclists. I don't know if they are liable or not.
He did look both ways. The problem was bikers in the MIDDLE of the street where they weren't visible. Maybe if it was a couple of seconds later he might have seen them but when he went to turn they were right there.
He was hoping the Judge would see " kids" as if they were small to see. Hoping it would go in his favour. He has no Insurance. He can go after these kids sort a say and sue them. He will lose again.
@georgebenevides The Defendant wasn't using kids as a description to misconstrue anything. The Defendant is the one that stated the guy on the bike was 25 yrs old. He actually repeats it so, it could be clear they should have known better than what they were doing.
Neighborhood street, cars parked on corner, and a 90 degree turn? How fast could you have been going that you couldn’t simply stop and avoid the hitting the parked cars? Also if the biker was hanging on to the driver side then his maneuver would’ve put the biker in way more danger than swerving in the opposite direction.
Taking a tun slower or watching what is coming does nothing for the fact if a vehicle is blocking being able to see anything coming. So if there’s an obstruction to being able to see what’s coming down the street, how is a driver supposed to figure out if anything is coming? I guess just wait until a vehicle (or biker) passes in front of you. Though, who knows what’s coming next down the street. You can’t get further up ‘cause once you can see, then you’re in the way of people coming down the street. So I don’t understand that for him, the corner parker should’ve been charged for the accident. Meaning paying him back for what he has to pay her or at least getting ticketed. Corner parking is supposed to be illegal, but pretty much no one gets in trouble for doing it. This whole thing would’ve been easily avoided if that vehicle wasn’t in the way. So I don’t understand what she’s taking about with the blocking of visibility to see not being a factor and it’s just that driving needs to be slower, waiting to see what’s coming, and being more cautious is the answer to not getting in accident when the only way to see what’s coming is to drive and be enough in the street (which can cause an accident) or to wait to see what’s coming which would be only visible when they’re passing your intersection/exit.
This is one of the most unusual cases I've seen in twenty-some-odd years of watching TPC. Everybody's so nice, and the judge even gets caught probing the defendant about his knowledge of Spanish. "Poquito," he answered.
Okay now wait, i know for a fact that the lady that drove her car through the front of that guys house didnt have to pay for the damage to the house because it was someone elses fault... (Totally different case, iykyk) she told the man after he gave her the pictures that she solidified her case against him... (May have been JJ)... So i dont get why some cases are ruled like this and others arent... Guess thats our justice system..
I think in this case he would need to go after the kids/ the family of the kids on the bike and they would have to pay for everything. The kids on the bike cause the guy to damage the woman’s parked car but didn’t do any damage themselves to the parked car, that’s why she had to go after the guy. The guy then will have to pay the lady. He then can go after the kids/the kids family and ask for payment to fix his vehicle and the money he had to pay the lady. For example if you manage to stop before hitting someone then someone hits you and forces you into the person. That person could sue you and win because you hit them and not the person who hit you. You could then sue the person who hit you for both the damages to your vehicle and the money you had to pay for the person you were pushed into. At least that’s what ugo said in one of his shorts.
@@dreams2dream627 I watch too much court TV 🤣 between the two of them though I've learned a lot but also I agree with it depends on who is trying the case...
9:00 At this point the ju8dge is full of crap. She basically said you should've been driven 5 miles in a 20-mile zone to avoid the accident. He did nothing wrong! But I acknowledge that he did damage the defendant's care and is responsible for the damage... That's why it's called an accident. The rest of the judges' BS, is just that, BS!
@@jblonari dont see the defendant in a jungle nor an ocean 🤷🏻♀️ lol and that could be grammatically correct, it still doesn’t sound right to me. But thats my own perspective. 😊
Sir its no excuse for you not to have insurance.If you don't have insurance then it means you do not drive ! You called a 25 year old man a child but your actions are more in line as childish.
I remember when i got hit by a car and was bleeding for the forehead, and i got up bc i didn't feel injured. And someone said "stay down" and get that $! But i was injured and got $25,000.
Since he isn't actually paying any money to the plaintiff don't see how he can sue the bicycle guys for any money. Since he is already whole. Also, he saw the bikers. He should have braked harder.
I've seen the un-ironed shirt on quite a few litigants before. The show gives him the shirt. On Judge Judy's show she always makes it a point to mention "you came into court with too casual attire". JJ rips into female litigants when they come in half naked. She has the show give them a sweater....lol.
The insurance is the easiest thing to get that’s required for a vehicle. Call an insurance company, give them the required vehicle info, pay a fee if they require it, or just pay monthly/every 6 months. I don’t understand the bikers argument. The reaction according to them of one of the bikers is super sus. I just don’t understand how it’s not the corner parker’s fault to pay the guy back? This guy should pay her ‘cause he hit her vehicle. It’s just that it’s supposed to be illegal to park at a corner. The corner parker was an obstruction to the point that the lady, guy, and bikers couldn’t see each other. Plus, corner parking is supposed to be illegal. I’m tired of corner parkers. Even the ones that park on the corner exits of a shopping center or business which the exit isn’t at the end of a street. That’s still a corner and clearly blocking the view of drivers. When the exit of a business or shopping center has both corners block, people should always be on look out for someone exiting ‘cause you can’t see them and they can’t see you. So they have to out whenever they can assume it’s clear. At least, the guy should’ve tried to get the corner parker cited for being a clear obstruction. They might not have to pay for the damages, but they should’ve at least tried for having them cited.
I think anytime you are in a neighborhood or complex you should be going a SLOW speed. Even in my conplex i see people goin crazy a$$ speeds as if its no possibility kids might be outside playing or un in the road.
Putting on a shirt straight out of the plastic with the cardboard insert imprint still being on the shirt and full of wrinkles, with no regard of going to court while also being presented on tv/internet is insane..
Judge was way off on this. When you have a multi vehicle accident, you assign the fault to 1. Like in a pile up. You don't make 50 lawsuits on each car involved, everyone makes 1 against the car at fault.
The diagram of the street then the Judge initially crossing out the traffic flow arrows then the defendants witness saying it's a two way (not one way) is a clustershtup of cuckoo crazy.🤪
I dont like it, and quit watching it after 2 episodes. The show is scripted and the stories were unbelievable. Maybe if they change the platform to real stories ill watch again.
This was a tough case because I can understand the defendant's side of this as well but ultimately the plaintiffs vehicle was damaged by him and for that reason should be held liable.
I guess it's tough, if you ignore evidence. Having seen you ignore it dozens of time, I believe this case was hard for you to comprehend. To the rest of us, it was not difficult at all.
Yeah she once again mistreated black people... Oh wait that's just in your own imagination and you can't spin this one yet again. When will you learn you are simply an idiot who is 100% wrong on Milian. Just accept it and people will stop clowning on you (mostly).
They should Call the show the black peoples court , it’s about all we see on here and from a people who apparently hate cops and never snitch🤣 no one calls the cops and snitch more than the humble black person .
Should have left the cousin at home because she lied. There is no way that the bikes were coming and in her way as she turned. Then she was able to drive to the end of the block and turn around and park and they aren't thru the intersection yet....They would have gone all the way thru before she got to the end of the block unless they were walking their bikes and even then maybe not enough time
The cyclists had every right to be cycling down the road and he should have stopped and let them pass, before just pulling out and hitting them, he was in the wrong, right from the start and if he tries to sue the cyclists he will be in for a shock when he has to pay them for the damaged bike...
BS ruling! She had the EXACT SAME type of case, person damaged property bc of another vehicle responsible, yet COMPLETE OPPOSITE ruling on that one! Absolute WORST judge in history!!! She NEVER rules the same way twice!
He is a liar and know he doesn't even speak Spanish we don't even say that word the way he pronounce it like that, I hope he loses everything I wish we can put him in jail and throw away the key for at least 20 to 25 years just to teach him a lesson!!!!
The family that came out and told the young man to "play" injured and "fake" like he's in pain is disgusting. Bad karma because it was probably the biker boy's fault.
My former brother in law is 100% Puerto Rican and he understands more Spanish than he speaks.
First a 25 year old isn't a kid or maybe I didn't hear it correctly
@@larryblankenship8180 You heard correctly. Oh, and "biker boy" is a general term that applies to all cyclist and motorcycle riders.
@@32ghostchaser WHAT???!!!
@@Vv08991 I’m guessing she means that you don’t have to be a Spaniard to speak Spanish lol
He said i understood enough when the sister told the boy to lay down and act hurt 🤣 glad he's ok
"No. I said some words." 😆😂 Best answer ever! 😂😂
I can't believe they used "words"😂
i love everyone's energy and the photo the plaintiff submitted gave a great view of the street/ how the accident really happened.
Yes, thank goodness for the Google Map because the shows diagram was confusing.
Surprised he didn’t say “Bikers, he hardly knew her”.
I don't even understand that ongoing joke of his
😂😂😂😂
😅😅😅😅
The little bit of Spanish took me out 🤣🤣🤣
For they learn English as a Second language in Mexico.
What does Mexico have to do with this?
Wow! That's South Side Queens!!! Respect to each litigant for being civil and telling the truth ❤
Everybody so civil, minus the liars faking the injury.
Wow the plantiff didn't even have to talk to win the case, just sit there and twiddle her thumbs. Must've been nice
NO INSURANCE?
HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DRIVING THAT CAR
Ughh I HATE when Milian calls herself using "urban slang" with Black litigants. She does it with no other race. She calls FULL GROWN OLDER Black women, "girl, honey, girlfriend" etc...but if a litigant DARE call her "miss" ...her tortillas get toasted??? #girlbye
Not her tortillas 😂😂😂
I also hate when she has cases with black women about hair extensions and wigs and acts as if it’s soooo difficult to understand and act like they’re the only race that wear hair extensions
She isnt Mexican you racist. She’s Cuban. Yall scream racism and do it right back.
Especially since she wears extensions too!
And throughout this case she called these grown men “bicycle boys” but I have heard her scold many male litigants for calling women girls. She can’t hide her own biases.
And that is the reason why I drive two to five miles per hour, slowly creeping along when my view is completely blocked by cars or other things in the road, because I can not see what's coming with the street being blocked......
Insurance is through the roof!! I’m about to get an electric scooter myself
No police report for an accident with an apparent bicyclist injury? Seems odd.
Great point. The lack of it sunk any chance for the defendant. Was the biker at fault? Note: the Google Map "added" the yellow lane marker down the middle.
The bicycle rider got up & ride away when they heard he didn't have insurance 😅
Considering the potential for injury or death. This wasnt bad at all. $1116.36
He knows “pokeito” Spanish 😂 what a nice guy
Defendant seems like a decent man. But one thing that bugs me about this day and age is calling 25 year old " kids" or " boys" , they're grown ass men!
You mean the defendant?
@@kamwilliams5541 ooops yeap, just corrected that
Not to the parents, or those who are parents, for 25, 30, 60 is still kid to them, as you will when you have children someday.
I agree that 25 isn't a boy or a child. She has told several people way younger than that that they need to grow up.
The defendant should’ve been liable just for the fact that he was in that car with no insurance. The judge should’ve stressed that out bc people need to understand that you cannot drive a car with no insurance under any circumstance
She did, you did not pay attention and did not listen.
@@trekgirl65 she mentioned it briefly but not towards the end when she was breaking down why she was concluding to her decision
He can fluently interpret Spanish, but can only speak it just a little, this completely left me on the floor in laughter 😃😃😃
That's pretty standard. Understanding it is one thing. Speaking is another.
Im the same way 😂😂 After 4 years of Spanish classes
Sounds like some of my family
Spanish teacher here - retired. The sequence to learning any language, naturally, is listening for comprehension. Speaking comes next. Then that's followed by reading and writing if you pursue it in school, or if your parents teach reading & writing at home. Spanish was my native tongue; I've been speaking it since I uttered my first words. Luckily, I grew up in a home where we were forced to speak Spanish... we had no choice. My mom introduced us to English only when my dad was at work from a very young age, so my siblings and I all became bilingual before we entered Kindergarten. But when dad was home from work, we all switched to Spanish only. He expected it of us, and there was no escaping it. It wasn't that he didn't understand or communicate in English, he just preferred that we stay fluent in Spanish since we'd be speaking in English at school and didn't need to worry about that. I'm grateful to my pops for instilling in me the importance of language and culture. He kept us close to our traditions, and my mom supported that. But because of them both, I became bilingual... first through listening, then through speaking when I was old enough to speak. Studying Spanish in college and getting a degree in it was just like buttercreme frosting on a cake - delicious. My parents gave me a solid foundation... studying my native language in college broadened my horizons. Teaching it was fun, but like some have mentioned, even studying it for 4 years in high school - if you don't use it, you lose it. And Spanish is such a practical language, I encourage everyone to learn it, or for that matter, any second language. It makes for open-mindedness with other cultures. Just my two cents. Not trying to pontificate.
My mom is like that. She grew up with Spanish being spoken in the home (her grandpa was from Mexico). She understands it perfectly but doesn't speak it. Or maybe she does and she's just never let me know that fact. HMMM.. Now Im thinking.
I love how the defendant's dress shirt still has the creases from the store. Just kind of endearing. Everyone seemed nice in this case; it was refreshing
But at least the defendant dressed for the occasion, it doesn't matter if he had just got the shirt from the store or not, he knew he had to go in there respectfully. There's a good possibility that since it's all done and said, the defendant could possibly have a case against the bicyclists. I don't know if they are liable or not.
No gender wrong. It was the Plaintiff for she is a she and wore the dress. LOL!
@@trekgirl65 RE-READ what the comment said. 🫢
@trekgirl65 it didn't say anything about a dress.... it said "DRESS SHIRT"
That van shouldn't be parked so close on the corner. He could collect from the van owner too.
The defendant cannot go after the bikers even if he does find them because he was an uninsured driver so he loses automatically
You can tell the defendant just got that shirt because you see all the exact creases as it’s folded in the package
What’s with the Plantiffs wig? 😂😂😂
You have to look both ways even while turning onto a one way street.
He did look both ways. The problem was bikers in the MIDDLE of the street where they weren't visible. Maybe if it was a couple of seconds later he might have seen them but when he went to turn they were right there.
If you can’t see as you enter you should be at a slow roll with foot on break
Exactly this!
Dang! That white van makes it hard to know if "the coast is clear!" The defendant will lose if he sues the bicyclists! 🚴♀️🚴♀️
Why are you calling 24 Year old men kids?
He was hoping the Judge would see " kids" as if they were small to see. Hoping it would go in his favour. He has no Insurance. He can go after these kids sort a say and sue them. He will lose again.
@georgebenevides The Defendant wasn't using kids as a description to misconstrue anything. The Defendant is the one that stated the guy on the bike was 25 yrs old. He actually repeats it so, it could be clear they should have known better than what they were doing.
@@panamafernandez4641Truth.
Neighborhood street, cars parked on corner, and a 90 degree turn? How fast could you have been going that you couldn’t simply stop and avoid the hitting the parked cars? Also if the biker was hanging on to the driver side then his maneuver would’ve put the biker in way more danger than swerving in the opposite direction.
No insurance = trouble!
I would've been shocked if he actually had insurance 😅
"Poquito"🤣😅
When did 25 become a “child”??? 🤣
Taking a tun slower or watching what is coming does nothing for the fact if a vehicle is blocking being able to see anything coming. So if there’s an obstruction to being able to see what’s coming down the street, how is a driver supposed to figure out if anything is coming? I guess just wait until a vehicle (or biker) passes in front of you. Though, who knows what’s coming next down the street. You can’t get further up ‘cause once you can see, then you’re in the way of people coming down the street. So I don’t understand that for him, the corner parker should’ve been charged for the accident. Meaning paying him back for what he has to pay her or at least getting ticketed. Corner parking is supposed to be illegal, but pretty much no one gets in trouble for doing it. This whole thing would’ve been easily avoided if that vehicle wasn’t in the way. So I don’t understand what she’s taking about with the blocking of visibility to see not being a factor and it’s just that driving needs to be slower, waiting to see what’s coming, and being more cautious is the answer to not getting in accident when the only way to see what’s coming is to drive and be enough in the street (which can cause an accident) or to wait to see what’s coming which would be only visible when they’re passing your intersection/exit.
Good fair case.
Hi All❤, What is the ACCIDENT RATE ,in That Neighborhood? No Signs (Traffic) Posted on Corners or Crosswalk Markings. 🤯🤯🤯
The streets are very narrow two ways with no traffic lines.
Dude took the shirt out the pack and put it on with no ironing 💀
I wonder if he got sued by the owner of the other car he hit?
This is one of the most unusual cases I've seen in twenty-some-odd years of watching TPC. Everybody's so nice, and the judge even gets caught probing the defendant about his knowledge of Spanish. "Poquito," he answered.
Poquito* … sorry cant help myself gahh
@@danir6695 You're right. Didn't look right to me, but I shrugged it off. Will correct it. Thanks.
She said she can get it fixed now . Well don't you have a deductible on your insurance.
Okay now wait, i know for a fact that the lady that drove her car through the front of that guys house didnt have to pay for the damage to the house because it was someone elses fault... (Totally different case, iykyk) she told the man after he gave her the pictures that she solidified her case against him... (May have been JJ)... So i dont get why some cases are ruled like this and others arent... Guess thats our justice system..
I think in this case he would need to go after the kids/ the family of the kids on the bike and they would have to pay for everything. The kids on the bike cause the guy to damage the woman’s parked car but didn’t do any damage themselves to the parked car, that’s why she had to go after the guy. The guy then will have to pay the lady. He then can go after the kids/the kids family and ask for payment to fix his vehicle and the money he had to pay the lady. For example if you manage to stop before hitting someone then someone hits you and forces you into the person. That person could sue you and win because you hit them and not the person who hit you. You could then sue the person who hit you for both the damages to your vehicle and the money you had to pay for the person you were pushed into. At least that’s what ugo said in one of his shorts.
I saw that case. That was JJ, but I get what you're saying. Depending on who u get to try the case you may get a different outcome.
@darksaber230 I love Ugo! He is great! Also Law by Mike! 😁
@@adwallace021938 agreed! I watch both of them and they both help make the law much more understandable.
@@dreams2dream627 I watch too much court TV 🤣 between the two of them though I've learned a lot but also I agree with it depends on who is trying the case...
If. guy is going to "panic" when confronted with 2 bicyclists on a residential street, he really shouldn't be driving
She must be a fan of Miami Vice.
4:45 the Kid Ojibwa the bike how old? 25 😂😂😂 the hood bro
9:00 At this point the ju8dge is full of crap. She basically said you should've been driven 5 miles in a 20-mile zone to avoid the accident. He did nothing wrong! But I acknowledge that he did damage the defendant's care and is responsible for the damage... That's why it's called an accident. The rest of the judges' BS, is just that, BS!
It's illegal to drive without insurance. Which I doubt he ever had.
Everyone still calling them the kids when they're in their mid 20s. The defendant is probably younger than the kids 😅
Floors are inside, the ground is outside… just sayin
Yes; but they call it the jungle floor and the ocean floor.
They sometimes say that I’ve noticed it too
@@jblonari dont see the defendant in a jungle nor an ocean 🤷🏻♀️ lol and that could be grammatically correct, it still doesn’t sound right to me. But thats my own perspective. 😊
@@danir6695 was giving an outside example
@@jblonari gotcha, and you do have a point!
People love to talk and tell a story
All I see is swapped paint wtf is broken....
Wigs have came a long way
Regardless Pedestrians have the right of way, and he was in control and behind the wheel, Doesn't seem like he yielded before an during his turn
Sir its no excuse for you not to have insurance.If you don't have insurance then it means you do not drive ! You called a 25 year old man a child but your actions are more in line as childish.
It astonishes me how many people don't understand the drawing board.
Seems to me, the biker might have a claim against the driver for not yielding the right of way.
I remember when i got hit by a car and was bleeding for the forehead, and i got up bc i didn't feel injured. And someone said "stay down" and get that $! But i was injured and got $25,000.
Since he isn't actually paying any money to the plaintiff don't see how he can sue the bicycle guys for any money. Since he is already whole. Also, he saw the bikers. He should have braked harder.
He should've ironed that shirt. Took it out of the plastic and put it on. Pay the lady, get some coverage & let this be a lesson. It happens.
I've seen the un-ironed shirt on quite a few litigants before. The show gives him the shirt. On Judge Judy's show she always makes it a point to mention "you came into court with too casual attire". JJ rips into female litigants when they come in half naked. She has the show give them a sweater....lol.
A 25 year old kid? ✋
A 25 year old kid ?? Hell he probably got 3 or 4 kids.
@@christinekelly7769 lol, yes 😃
It's society's fault. 25 is the new 15.
The insurance is the easiest thing to get that’s required for a vehicle. Call an insurance company, give them the required vehicle info, pay a fee if they require it, or just pay monthly/every 6 months. I don’t understand the bikers argument. The reaction according to them of one of the bikers is super sus. I just don’t understand how it’s not the corner parker’s fault to pay the guy back? This guy should pay her ‘cause he hit her vehicle. It’s just that it’s supposed to be illegal to park at a corner. The corner parker was an obstruction to the point that the lady, guy, and bikers couldn’t see each other. Plus, corner parking is supposed to be illegal. I’m tired of corner parkers. Even the ones that park on the corner exits of a shopping center or business which the exit isn’t at the end of a street. That’s still a corner and clearly blocking the view of drivers. When the exit of a business or shopping center has both corners block, people should always be on look out for someone exiting ‘cause you can’t see them and they can’t see you. So they have to out whenever they can assume it’s clear. At least, the guy should’ve tried to get the corner parker cited for being a clear obstruction. They might not have to pay for the damages, but they should’ve at least tried for having them cited.
I knew the plaintiff was going to win, this was an easy case,
Po kee dough
What dat mouth do? 👄
Tf
This case is shut n closed you hit the car 🚗 pay the cast
I think anytime you are in a neighborhood or complex you should be going a SLOW speed. Even in my conplex i see people goin crazy a$$ speeds as if its no possibility kids might be outside playing or un in the road.
I thought the judge had flatscreen TVs why does that look like a coloring board? Everything is digital she went back to the old school.
The defendant shirt clearly just came out of the packaging.
Putting on a shirt straight out of the plastic with the cardboard insert imprint still being on the shirt and full of wrinkles, with no regard of going to court while also being presented on tv/internet is insane..
😂. I caught that too!
Judge was way off on this. When you have a multi vehicle accident, you assign the fault to 1. Like in a pile up. You don't make 50 lawsuits on each car involved, everyone makes 1 against the car at fault.
Thank you! This judge is so incompetent!
Wrong
The diagram of the street then the Judge initially crossing out the traffic flow arrows then the defendants witness saying it's a two way (not one way) is a clustershtup of cuckoo crazy.🤪
Ladies, if you put a little powder on your wig, it will look more natural.
How’s everyone liking her new show? Me personally not a huge fan of
I dont like it, and quit watching it after 2 episodes. The show is scripted and the stories were unbelievable. Maybe if they change the platform to real stories ill watch again.
I can't find it anywhere except you tube 😒
What in the hell does Doug have in his mouth? I don’t remember hearing him talk like this.
I’m sure the woman that got the car hit. Got money back from the insurance company. Don’t understand why she hasn’t gotten the car fixed yet.?
Sometimes the damage is minimal, it's not worth the deductible plus increase in premiums. I would have done the same.
This was a tough case because I can understand the defendant's side of this as well but ultimately the plaintiffs vehicle was damaged by him and for that reason should be held liable.
I guess it's tough, if you ignore evidence. Having seen you ignore it dozens of time, I believe this case was hard for you to comprehend. To the rest of us, it was not difficult at all.
Yeah she once again mistreated black people... Oh wait that's just in your own imagination and you can't spin this one yet again. When will you learn you are simply an idiot who is 100% wrong on Milian. Just accept it and people will stop clowning on you (mostly).
They should Call the show the black peoples court , it’s about all we see on here and from a people who apparently hate cops and never snitch🤣 no one calls the cops and snitch more than the humble black person .
You're 🌽. Take a nap.
It's because we're the most entertaining hun
Should have left the cousin at home because she lied. There is no way that the bikes were coming and in her way as she turned. Then she was able to drive to the end of the block and turn around and park and they aren't thru the intersection yet....They would have gone all the way thru before she got to the end of the block unless they were walking their bikes and even then maybe not enough time
The cyclists had every right to be cycling down the road and he should have stopped and let them pass, before just pulling out and hitting them, he was in the wrong, right from the start and if he tries to sue the cyclists he will be in for a shock when he has to pay them for the damaged bike...
Here❤❤❤
BS ruling! She had the EXACT SAME type of case, person damaged property bc of another vehicle responsible, yet COMPLETE OPPOSITE ruling on that one! Absolute WORST judge in history!!! She NEVER rules the same way twice!
All those WE WAS and THEY WAS were annoying asf. Why tf won't Judge Milian correct these people's sh i t grammar. Daaamn!!
If she did, that’s all she would be doing and would never get around to the case 😂
Defendant is a loser. You hit a parked car, you're responsible. Trying to blame some kids. SMH
25 year olds are hardly kids lmfao
25 year old kids? What planet are you from?
Here 3th .Heyyy family
4th let good pc fam
Here 1st😂
😅🍪
He is a liar and know he doesn't even speak Spanish we don't even say that word the way he pronounce it like that, I hope he loses everything I wish we can put him in jail and throw away the key for at least 20 to 25 years just to teach him a lesson!!!!
You got some serious issues.
Are you okay?
Wow! You need to lay off the caffeine shots, you're about to lose that last brain cell.
Primo! What is your malfunction?!
You sound crazy racist.
Primo! Calm down!
blm