SB Fairies entrance comparison 2/5 reconstruction

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @mrlopez-pz7pu
    @mrlopez-pz7pu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ratmansky followed the notation to the letter whenever practical and/or possible, Vikharev's reconstrucion is more of an "editorial adaptation" that gives precedence to the Soviet-era revisions. Perhaps one day we shall have the Ratmansky restoration of Petipa's choreographic text with the 1890 production. Same goes for Ratmanskys Bayadere.

  • @doris6526
    @doris6526 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Qué maravilloso es el ballet!

  • @INOBT100
    @INOBT100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where did you find this historic piece of art?

  • @Grunyaprotazova
    @Grunyaprotazova 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Guau! Thank you so much for this! :)

  • @arepo
    @arepo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The economy version ::grin:: They should do something about the wraps, two fairies got their feet tangled in them.
    There's more pantomime than in the other reconstruction, but it's good, intelligible panto.
    @2:25 I don't like the pages' "hunchback" walk. If it signifies something, I didn't get it.
    The wigs are awful, the fabric of the tutus a bit too heavy, and a little more color contrast between the fairies wouldn't hurt in my opinion. Poor queen, to be saddled with that costume.

  • @Marta44339
    @Marta44339 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The tutus have the right form for a reconstruction but don't look good together. Hate the wigs. Hate all wigs . Nevertheless it is very interesting to see all of these. thank you.

    • @arepo
      @arepo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The basic form is good enough but they aren't bell-shaped, they look like modern cocktail dresses, ha ha. Manuel Legris was one of few who looked good with a wig, but the French have better wigs.