Ceux que je vois écrire "should of" / "could of", qui mélangent systématiquement there, they're et their, c'est 90% du temps des natifs. Parce que ceux qui apprennent l'anglais ils apprennent la grammaire aussi.
@paultaylorcomedy UN PEU? UN PEUUUUU? C'est pas en trichant UN PEU qu'on arrive à ce niveau! Pour tricher c'est pas une antisèche que tu dois cacher pas un putain de Bécherel doublé d'un dictionnaire ! Seriously when I first heard you I was like: "Hmmm, he speaks English quite well for a french guy."
Scottish Gaelic as well. In fact, the entire Celtic language tree is probably more learners than natives (how many people speak Cornish or Manx natively?)
@tthaas The last native speaker of Manx died in 1974, while the last native speaker of Cornish supposedly died in 1777. There is now a very limited number of new native speakers for both languages (less than 30 each) due to revival efforts, but the authenticity can be questioned, especially in the case of Cornish. There are also ancient languages with no native speakers that are still being taught and are therefore known by some people (myself included), but I'm not counting those. Apparently there is one native speaker of classical Latin. His parents did that as an experiment.
@jonistan9268 I'd argue that the revival speakers count as natives if they've been speaking it since birth, much like the native Classical Latin speaker (from that angle, Paul's daughter Louise would qualify as a native English speaker, too), or any number of bilingual speakers of other languages (ie, my daughter's friend who speaks perfect English outside the home, but who speaks perfect Spanish at home as his parents speak it as their mother tongue). The fact that the language as it's spoken today is very likely slightly different from (or is "less authentic than") the original Manx and Cornish matters little -- languages change over time, after all, any differences in the revival languages are just a very abrupt change in a short time -- in which case Manx and Cornish almost assuredly have more learners than natives.
@tthaas I do count them as native speakers of the Cornish and Manx they're speaking. I'm only questioning the authenticity of their native languages when comparing them to the languages that officially died out in 1777 and 1974 respectively. In theory, you could make up a language and make your child a native speaker of said language.
Two slightly pedantic points. 1, there are languages where there's more people learning it as a secondary language than there are native speakers (defining "native speaker" as "someone who has spoken the language their entire life"); Scottish Gaelic and Irish immediately come to mind, and perhaps Welsh as well. 2, from 5:17 on, by this logic the game the EPL plays really IS properly called "soccer" (and it's originally a British slang term for "association" as in "association football") in the English-speaking world, since 335 million Americans, 40 million Canadians, 60 million South Africans, 26 million Australians and 5 million New Zealanders call it that, and that's the majority of the English-speaking world.
But what about all the other countries/languages that say Football? That's a wrong example because it is kind of international. But words such as lorry (truck) and trousers (pants, to not confuse with underwear) can follow your logic.
@@justlutra What other languages call a thing isn't relevant to the English name for it, unless English borrowed the name from another language; if they want to change the name of an English thing they borrow, that's on them. Since soccer is an invention of an English-speaking people, majority rules on the name in the English lexicon.
Paul’s diatribe against Les immortels? Timeless classic.
la blague du jeune intermittent est une des meilleures blagues de standup que j'ai jamais entendue, c'est vraiment une dinguerie
Thanks, I'll tell my wife 🤣
Ceux que je vois écrire "should of" / "could of", qui mélangent systématiquement there, they're et their, c'est 90% du temps des natifs. Parce que ceux qui apprennent l'anglais ils apprennent la grammaire aussi.
Oui mais certains d'entre eux sont dislexiques et ils ne le crient pas forcément sur tous les toits
Le mec il parle vraiment trop bien français c'est incroyable
He was raised in France, he speaks like a native.
Thanks, mais je triche un peu quand même!
@paultaylorcomedy UN PEU? UN PEUUUUU? C'est pas en trichant UN PEU qu'on arrive à ce niveau! Pour tricher c'est pas une antisèche que tu dois cacher pas un putain de Bécherel doublé d'un dictionnaire !
Seriously when I first heard you I was like: "Hmmm, he speaks English quite well for a french guy."
There are also more people learning Irish than there are Irish native speakers, so this isn't just true for English.
Scottish Gaelic as well. In fact, the entire Celtic language tree is probably more learners than natives (how many people speak Cornish or Manx natively?)
@tthaas The last native speaker of Manx died in 1974, while the last native speaker of Cornish supposedly died in 1777. There is now a very limited number of new native speakers for both languages (less than 30 each) due to revival efforts, but the authenticity can be questioned, especially in the case of Cornish. There are also ancient languages with no native speakers that are still being taught and are therefore known by some people (myself included), but I'm not counting those. Apparently there is one native speaker of classical Latin. His parents did that as an experiment.
@jonistan9268 I'd argue that the revival speakers count as natives if they've been speaking it since birth, much like the native Classical Latin speaker (from that angle, Paul's daughter Louise would qualify as a native English speaker, too), or any number of bilingual speakers of other languages (ie, my daughter's friend who speaks perfect English outside the home, but who speaks perfect Spanish at home as his parents speak it as their mother tongue). The fact that the language as it's spoken today is very likely slightly different from (or is "less authentic than") the original Manx and Cornish matters little -- languages change over time, after all, any differences in the revival languages are just a very abrupt change in a short time -- in which case Manx and Cornish almost assuredly have more learners than natives.
@tthaas I do count them as native speakers of the Cornish and Manx they're speaking. I'm only questioning the authenticity of their native languages when comparing them to the languages that officially died out in 1777 and 1974 respectively.
In theory, you could make up a language and make your child a native speaker of said language.
True, I guess the article I wrote considered those languages as not important 😕
Pole Télor
pôle tailleur
Pôle Taïlaur'
Two slightly pedantic points. 1, there are languages where there's more people learning it as a secondary language than there are native speakers (defining "native speaker" as "someone who has spoken the language their entire life"); Scottish Gaelic and Irish immediately come to mind, and perhaps Welsh as well. 2, from 5:17 on, by this logic the game the EPL plays really IS properly called "soccer" (and it's originally a British slang term for "association" as in "association football") in the English-speaking world, since 335 million Americans, 40 million Canadians, 60 million South Africans, 26 million Australians and 5 million New Zealanders call it that, and that's the majority of the English-speaking world.
But what about all the other countries/languages that say Football?
That's a wrong example because it is kind of international.
But words such as lorry (truck) and trousers (pants, to not confuse with underwear) can follow your logic.
@@justlutra What other languages call a thing isn't relevant to the English name for it, unless English borrowed the name from another language; if they want to change the name of an English thing they borrow, that's on them. Since soccer is an invention of an English-speaking people, majority rules on the name in the English lexicon.
belgium man! belgium! (quoting H2G2)
More people also try learn reading Arabic allover the globe then there are native Arabic speakers
incroyable!
Y a un stéréotype sur les Belges et leur supposé amour des enfants ? WTF ? On peut pas plutôt revenir aux blagounettes pas méchantes ? ;_;
C'est vrai. C'est comme toujours associer les allemands avec Hitler.
Sixty million people... What about Canada, Australia, New Zealand...?
I don't think they are English
@@can_pacis they're native English speakers.
@@domitiennegegou5967 5:27
@@domitiennegegou5967it’s cos we speak it like shit ❤️
@@domitiennegegou5967but also on a genuine note he was talking about English people not English speakers
Parce que l’anglais n’est que du français mal prononcé et pis c’est tout 😅
Et mal écrit, parce que _draught_ sérieux les gars 😂
@ excellent 🤣
@@marcmonnerat4850 "L'extrême draught" 🤣🤣🤣
Haha, great point