Honestly I don't even understand why this went to court. This is why our legal system is a mess. They r suing a person for adopting a child so siblings can stay together. They went to "try" and convince the mother to allow them to adopt them. That means they knew it wasn't a certainty. Whether it was a week 2 weeks before the birth who cares. The adoptive mother has the right to decide. She decided for someone else.
What's bothering me is that they're acting like the baby is a doll on sale during Black Friday. Or like they're fans camping out the concert venue to get the best seats.
Everybody talk down on the lady !but I see her side! While she did not show emotional stability that I would like a mother to have. I can see why she was so upset she had 2 people that she thought were her best friends mad on some jealousy get back shit suing her on national television for less money than the gift she give them for Christmas instead of accepted her apology and being happy for her and her children like a true friend would ! It was about the money and them man didn't care about that baby they wanted a new doll to play with! Period and for that fact alone she had every right to be so upset!
If you don't want to have children or can keep them, YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX!!!! Sex is not a human right! I hate IRRESPONSIBLE adults who only think about themselves!
That blond calls herself a Mother? What a nasty woman! Let me guess she was a mean girl and bully in high school. You should be very ashamed of yourself. I don't believe the men thought this through before taking her to court. I think they wanted her to hurt as much as they did. 😢
There is no way this should have gone to court. They can dress it up all they like, they were trying to strong arm the buryh mother in to giving the baby to them. The judge said she could understand their resentment, but I can understand the defendants exasperation. They couldn't even express what their allegation or claim was. Not to mention the fact that keeping the siblings together should be paramount to anything. Being "rich and successful" doesn't automatically make you good parents and I worry about their existing child with their parents' total lack of a moral compass
Yes, if possible siblings should be together but this woman kept telling the two men she wasn’t interested. They were acting in good faith by flying to Indiana. It’s sad, but the men need to eat this expense and move on. I hope they can find another child to adopt for a happy future.
Both people pissing me off. They are way too immature to consider having another child. The men should realize what’s important for the child long term and the women should stop playing a victim and then taunting in their faces. Smh
The judge made the right decision legally , however their so call friend just laugh in their faces , and I believe she made up her mind be for she saw the baby to keep the new baby that she did not want , and it seemed like she ghosted them and that made them feel so bad I do like the idea of the siblings growing up together .
@@greyskies9295 Mate, you need to educate yourself. A magistrate and a lawyer and a judge are all different things. Just because someone's a lawyer, it doesn't make them a judge. Judge Judy and Judge Milian served as real judges in real life, Judge Christina never served a real judge, she's an actor and just a tv judge.
I would not let that woman adopt a pet. She is unable to control herself. Her go to was snide gay slurs which says she's not a good person and definitely not a role model for a young child.
Look, they're sueing because they were their spending their own money and so she could've communicated sooner to them that she was going to take the child so they could've gone home. Basically they're just pissed that she didn't at least let them know sooner. Why that makes her liable for the entire trip, I have no idea. It could make her liable for a couple of days of the hotel stay if she and the mother had already fully decided, but there's no way for him to prove that
Siblings being together may be preferable. Heck, siblings being raised by their birth parents may be even more preferable, but neither is always in the best interest of the child. I honestly think the stable couple would have been a better choice but that is just me.
I believe in a moral and ethical adoption process that will serve the educational, spiritual, moral and ethical process of leading fine upstanding lives helping others as well as yourself. Bettering the community at large. Greece and Rome fell. Morals count
It’s kind of very messy situation on way how they dealt with this because they should’ve if they’re going to do agency they should’ve kept it agency and before spending any expenses they should’ve ran it by the agency so that the agency could document how much expenses they were actually spending to actually adopt his baby that way they could either have an agreement if they’re not at the end of the day if the mother changed her mind then she has to reimburse the couple that was actually paying for her basically pregnancy expenses because it’s kind of wrong for a person to actually promise something and then take their money to pay for medical Spencer related to the baby and then when it came time to produce said baby and then there’s no baby they should’ve had in a formal agreement a long time ago and she was already a six months pregnant and the mother should’ve actually settled on what she should’ve done before a long time before she contacted the defendant and even though there is a grace period after birth because we all understand that motherly instinct sometimes don’t shows up until that grace period once they actually look at the baby and apparently that happened to the defendant in the previously she said she didn’t want to adopt. That’s the reason she passed the opportunity to another couple now I understand that the plaintiff kind of feel hurt that they that were a opportunity to adopt and they just wanted to know get to know the mother a little bit more. The second chance around before adopting for the second chance with the same mother and I hate to say sometimes you know mothers are not exactly promise that monthly bond on each child they just kind of wanted to assess out if the mother was really genuine about you know giving her baby up again because it looks like this is her third pregnancy and each time you get pregnant it might be a different situation. We don’t know for sure and that maybe you know they just wanted to make sure she was actually Serious to wanting to give up her baby again because usually Sarah gets they kind of not. She’s not a surrogate but a lot of times swim I like this kind of do it only wants because they don’t want to chance have that bond and be heartbroken and having to struggle on having to provide for that child more than once it’s kind of that I think that old adage about you know having regret and about also you know being about is she really serious this time around about adopting for the third time usually they don’t go to no more than once twice is usually a miracle because of the feelings that are B would be involved I mean for you to go through nine months of pregnancy just to give it up. It’s a lot emotionally on a woman even if they were too be a gold digger call of spade. They’re just doing it for the money, but still, they still go through those feelings you know those emotions during pregnancy you don’t quit you don’t escape those feelings unscathed even down to the postpartum afterwards if you ever experience those now like with the judge she’s very you could tell that both sides they come from fluent backgrounds that just put it that way that they make probably more joy of us making a 10 years in one year in total on both sides then it kind of sucks that she’s the one that ends up with the second child that she said she didn’t want months prior but at the end of the day it’s on the mother she chose to go ahead with adoption with the defendant, even that she was actually negotiations with the second couple even though, if they said they went through the agency, they should’ve had a more formal agreement with the agency that should’ve been more binding, even though she declined months prior and they said they were usually go to the agency. I think she should’ve actually when she declined. She should’ve formally said I declined to adopt that third child on such such a date and that should’ve been legally finding because personally I think if they go through an agency that you only have one arrangement at a time that way you don’t have like multiple couples that that are vying for the same child and it doesn’t feel like you’re trying to buy a baby
Plaintiffs are looking for an accessory for their "beautiful baby girl," not another child. They not once spoke about this child as an individual being.
Really disgusting that two guys can marry and even adopt a baby girl!! Disgusting. Even giving them a boy is bad. Kids need a biological father and biological mother
It’s kind of very messy situation on way how they dealt with this because they should’ve if they’re going to do agency they should’ve kept it agency and before spending any expenses they should’ve ran it by the agency so that the agency could document how much expenses they were actually spending to actually adopt his baby that way they could either have an agreement if they’re not at the end of the day if the mother changed her mind then she has to reimburse the couple that was actually paying for her basically pregnancy expenses because it’s kind of wrong for a person to actually promise something and then take their money to pay for medical Spencer related to the baby and then when it came time to produce said baby and then there’s no baby they should’ve had in a formal agreement a long time ago and she was already a six months pregnant and the mother should’ve actually settled on what she should’ve done before a long time before she contacted the defendant and even though there is a grace period after birth because we all understand that motherly instinct sometimes don’t shows up until that grace period once they actually look at the baby and apparently that happened to the defendant in the previously she said she didn’t want to adopt. That’s the reason she passed the opportunity to another couple now I understand that the plaintiff kind of feel hurt that they that were a opportunity to adopt and they just wanted to know get to know the mother a little bit more. The second chance around before adopting for the second chance with the same mother and I hate to say sometimes you know mothers are not exactly promise that monthly bond on each child they just kind of wanted to assess out if the mother was really genuine about you know giving her baby up again because it looks like this is her third pregnancy and each time you get pregnant it might be a different situation. We don’t know for sure and that maybe you know they just wanted to make sure she was actually Serious to wanting to give up her baby again because usually Sarah gets they kind of not. She’s not a surrogate but a lot of times swim I like this kind of do it only wants because they don’t want to chance have that bond and be heartbroken and having to struggle on having to provide for that child more than once it’s kind of that I think that old adage about you know having regret and about also you know being about is she really serious this time around about adopting for the third time usually they don’t go to no more than once twice is usually a miracle because of the feelings that are B would be involved I mean for you to go through nine months of pregnancy just to give it up. It’s a lot emotionally on a woman even if they were too be a gold digger call of spade. They’re just doing it for the money, but still, they still go through those feelings you know those emotions during pregnancy you don’t quit you don’t escape those feelings unscathed even down to the postpartum afterwards if you ever experience those now like with the judge she’s very you could tell that both sides they come from fluent backgrounds that just put it that way that they make probably more joy of us making a 10 years in one year in total on both sides then it kind of sucks that she’s the one that ends up with the second child that she said she didn’t want months prior but at the end of the day it’s on the mother she chose to go ahead with adoption with the defendant, even that she was actually negotiations with the second couple even though, if they said they went through the agency, they should’ve had a more formal agreement with the agency that should’ve been more binding, even though she declined months prior and they said they were usually go to the agency. I think she should’ve actually when she declined. She should’ve formally said I declined to adopt that third child on such such a date and that should’ve been legally finding because personally I think if they go through an agency that you only have one arrangement at a time that way you don’t have like multiple couples that that are vying for the same child and it doesn’t feel like you’re trying to buy a baby
Honestly I don't even understand why this went to court. This is why our legal system is a mess. They r suing a person for adopting a child so siblings can stay together. They went to "try" and convince the mother to allow them to adopt them. That means they knew it wasn't a certainty. Whether it was a week 2 weeks before the birth who cares. The adoptive mother has the right to decide. She decided for someone else.
The real bad person in all this is the birth mother. She needs stop having babies that she then throws away.
Agreed! She's probably getting paid under the table!
lol but western women do this on average 7x per year except of course they murder them.
What's bothering me is that they're acting like the baby is a doll on sale during Black Friday. Or like they're fans camping out the concert venue to get the best seats.
I agree
Well, they're actors.
@@aliciagreen7512 Wait, what? They are?
Everybody talk down on the lady !but I see her side! While she did not show emotional stability that I would like a mother to have. I can see why she was so upset she had 2 people that she thought were her best friends mad on some jealousy get back shit suing her on national television for less money than the gift she give them for Christmas instead of accepted her apology and being happy for her and her children like a true friend would ! It was about the money and them man didn't care about that baby they wanted a new doll to play with! Period and for that fact alone she had every right to be so upset!
She was rude and homophobic. She was no friend of theirs.
So they basically want her to pay for their vacation $3200 for two weeks, clearly they don't care about the kid either they should not be parents
I'm concerned about all of the kids involved her. The lack of maturity of all of the adults is concerning.
If you don't want to have children or can keep them, YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX!!!! Sex is not a human right! I hate IRRESPONSIBLE adults who only think about themselves!
I’m sorry is that lady on something she’s so jittery and she can’t control herself.
That blond calls herself a Mother? What a nasty woman! Let me guess she was a mean girl and bully in high school. You should be very ashamed of yourself. I don't believe the men thought this through before taking her to court. I think they wanted her to hurt as much as they did. 😢
Yeah she reeks of mean girl who peaked in high school!
Separating siblings that have bonded vs a newborn addition to a family might be different things
There is no way this should have gone to court. They can dress it up all they like, they were trying to strong arm the buryh mother in to giving the baby to them.
The judge said she could understand their resentment, but I can understand the defendants exasperation. They couldn't even express what their allegation or claim was. Not to mention the fact that keeping the siblings together should be paramount to anything. Being "rich and successful"
doesn't automatically make you good parents and I worry about their existing child with their parents' total lack of a moral compass
Yes, if possible siblings should be together but this woman kept telling the two men she wasn’t interested. They were acting in good faith by flying to Indiana. It’s sad, but the men need to eat this expense and move on. I hope they can find another child to adopt for a happy future.
I agree
These 3 shouldn’t be parents!! Deny them. Ugh.
Both people pissing me off. They are way too immature to consider having another child. The men should realize what’s important for the child long term and the women should stop playing a victim and then taunting in their faces. Smh
The judge made the right decision legally , however their so call friend just laugh in their faces , and I believe she made up her mind be for she saw the baby to keep the new baby that she did not want , and it seemed like she ghosted them and that made them feel so bad I do like the idea of the siblings growing up together .
But with this mother? She's a fookin mess! I can't believe someone gave her their babies!
Judge Christina was friendly and kind; if this were Judge Judy, Susan would shut off. She was so annoying. I'm glad Judge Christina Sent her out.
The difference is, Judge Judy was a real judge. This one isn't, wasn't and never will be.
@@hkburrows
You are wrong. She is a real judge and a lawyer
@@greyskies9295 She is a lawyer, she's never been a real sitting judge.
@@hkburrows
She is a lawyer which qualifies for her to be a judge. Like a magistrate . My cousin was a magistrate and never went to law school
@@greyskies9295 Mate, you need to educate yourself. A magistrate and a lawyer and a judge are all different things. Just because someone's a lawyer, it doesn't make them a judge. Judge Judy and Judge Milian served as real judges in real life, Judge Christina never served a real judge, she's an actor and just a tv judge.
I would not let that woman adopt a pet. She is unable to control herself. Her go to was snide gay slurs which says she's not a good person and definitely not a role model for a young child.
Absolutely! 💯%
Look, they're sueing because they were their spending their own money and so she could've communicated sooner to them that she was going to take the child so they could've gone home. Basically they're just pissed that she didn't at least let them know sooner. Why that makes her liable for the entire trip, I have no idea. It could make her liable for a couple of days of the hotel stay if she and the mother had already fully decided, but there's no way for him to prove that
They're both immature and acting so stupid. The woman doesn't owe the good faith couple any $. Just gross people.
Siblings being together may be preferable. Heck, siblings being raised by their birth parents may be even more preferable, but neither is always in the best interest of the child.
I honestly think the stable couple would have been a better choice but that is just me.
I agree! She's an absolute mess!
Defendant is a baby factory. Sells her kids. Leads them on for $$.
I believe in a moral and ethical adoption process that will serve the educational, spiritual, moral and ethical process of leading fine upstanding lives helping others as well as yourself.
Bettering the community at large.
Greece and Rome fell.
Morals count
Nope I think they were all into the adoption, what was wrong was the 2 weeks they were kept hanging in another state
And I understand what you’re saying about having a sibling but this case both of them got a sibling
No one is mentioning this baby factory y'all are calling the birth mom is a disgrace just having kids like some street dog
It’s kind of very messy situation on way how they dealt with this because they should’ve if they’re going to do agency they should’ve kept it agency and before spending any expenses they should’ve ran it by the agency so that the agency could document how much expenses they were actually spending to actually adopt his baby that way they could either have an agreement if they’re not at the end of the day if the mother changed her mind then she has to reimburse the couple that was actually paying for her basically pregnancy expenses because it’s kind of wrong for a person to actually promise something and then take their money to pay for medical Spencer related to the baby and then when it came time to produce said baby and then there’s no baby they should’ve had in a formal agreement a long time ago and she was already a six months pregnant and the mother should’ve actually settled on what she should’ve done before a long time before she contacted the defendant and even though there is a grace period after birth because we all understand that motherly instinct sometimes don’t shows up until that grace period once they actually look at the baby and apparently that happened to the defendant in the previously she said she didn’t want to adopt. That’s the reason she passed the opportunity to another couple now I understand that the plaintiff kind of feel hurt that they that were a opportunity to adopt and they just wanted to know get to know the mother a little bit more. The second chance around before adopting for the second chance with the same mother and I hate to say sometimes you know mothers are not exactly promise that monthly bond on each child they just kind of wanted to assess out if the mother was really genuine about you know giving her baby up again because it looks like this is her third pregnancy and each time you get pregnant it might be a different situation. We don’t know for sure and that maybe you know they just wanted to make sure she was actually Serious to wanting to give up her baby again because usually Sarah gets they kind of not. She’s not a surrogate but a lot of times swim I like this kind of do it only wants because they don’t want to chance have that bond and be heartbroken and having to struggle on having to provide for that child more than once it’s kind of that I think that old adage about you know having regret and about also you know being about is she really serious this time around about adopting for the third time usually they don’t go to no more than once twice is usually a miracle because of the feelings that are B would be involved I mean for you to go through nine months of pregnancy just to give it up. It’s a lot emotionally on a woman even if they were too be a gold digger call of spade. They’re just doing it for the money, but still, they still go through those feelings you know those emotions during pregnancy you don’t quit you don’t escape those feelings unscathed even down to the postpartum afterwards if you ever experience those now like with the judge she’s very you could tell that both sides they come from fluent backgrounds that just put it that way that they make probably more joy of us making a 10 years in one year in total on both sides then it kind of sucks that she’s the one that ends up with the second child that she said she didn’t want months prior but at the end of the day it’s on the mother she chose to go ahead with adoption with the defendant, even that she was actually negotiations with the second couple even though, if they said they went through the agency, they should’ve had a more formal agreement with the agency that should’ve been more binding, even though she declined months prior and they said they were usually go to the agency. I think she should’ve actually when she declined. She should’ve formally said I declined to adopt that third child on such such a date and that should’ve been legally finding because personally I think if they go through an agency that you only have one arrangement at a time that way you don’t have like multiple couples that that are vying for the same child and it doesn’t feel like you’re trying to buy a baby
Did I misunderstand or do both the plaintiff & defendants have a child from the birth mother?
No. Susan has siblings. The men have an adopted child but not from that birth mom.
Yes. The men have one and the lady has one.
@@poeticloveeThanks, that’s what I thought. The birth mother had a third child that was given to the defendant.
Well yeah they had the older sibling they should have the younger one that just makes sense
Plaintiffs are looking for an accessory for their "beautiful baby girl," not another child.
They not once spoke about this child as an individual being.
I really don't like this blonde woman.
your takes and comments on certan videos make me tink you lack life experience and have a naive judgement on things.
Really disgusting that two guys can marry and even adopt a baby girl!! Disgusting. Even giving them a boy is bad. Kids need a biological father and biological mother
So should children not be adopted?
What a crazy comment! Do you not believe in the adoption process?!
Thank you for saying this. You are an angel! Kids need to be adopted but not by any couple that isn’t a male and a female who married each other ❤
@@ArpanaSharon two parents are better than none
Finally first 😂
P.s Keep up the great work. I like hearing your conclusions at the end, plus the sweetest thing is you let the video breathe. Fresh Air
What's with the terrible music you're playing. Horrible tune and couldn't hear much of what you were saying.
It’s kind of very messy situation on way how they dealt with this because they should’ve if they’re going to do agency they should’ve kept it agency and before spending any expenses they should’ve ran it by the agency so that the agency could document how much expenses they were actually spending to actually adopt his baby that way they could either have an agreement if they’re not at the end of the day if the mother changed her mind then she has to reimburse the couple that was actually paying for her basically pregnancy expenses because it’s kind of wrong for a person to actually promise something and then take their money to pay for medical Spencer related to the baby and then when it came time to produce said baby and then there’s no baby they should’ve had in a formal agreement a long time ago and she was already a six months pregnant and the mother should’ve actually settled on what she should’ve done before a long time before she contacted the defendant and even though there is a grace period after birth because we all understand that motherly instinct sometimes don’t shows up until that grace period once they actually look at the baby and apparently that happened to the defendant in the previously she said she didn’t want to adopt. That’s the reason she passed the opportunity to another couple now I understand that the plaintiff kind of feel hurt that they that were a opportunity to adopt and they just wanted to know get to know the mother a little bit more. The second chance around before adopting for the second chance with the same mother and I hate to say sometimes you know mothers are not exactly promise that monthly bond on each child they just kind of wanted to assess out if the mother was really genuine about you know giving her baby up again because it looks like this is her third pregnancy and each time you get pregnant it might be a different situation. We don’t know for sure and that maybe you know they just wanted to make sure she was actually Serious to wanting to give up her baby again because usually Sarah gets they kind of not. She’s not a surrogate but a lot of times swim I like this kind of do it only wants because they don’t want to chance have that bond and be heartbroken and having to struggle on having to provide for that child more than once it’s kind of that I think that old adage about you know having regret and about also you know being about is she really serious this time around about adopting for the third time usually they don’t go to no more than once twice is usually a miracle because of the feelings that are B would be involved I mean for you to go through nine months of pregnancy just to give it up. It’s a lot emotionally on a woman even if they were too be a gold digger call of spade. They’re just doing it for the money, but still, they still go through those feelings you know those emotions during pregnancy you don’t quit you don’t escape those feelings unscathed even down to the postpartum afterwards if you ever experience those now like with the judge she’s very you could tell that both sides they come from fluent backgrounds that just put it that way that they make probably more joy of us making a 10 years in one year in total on both sides then it kind of sucks that she’s the one that ends up with the second child that she said she didn’t want months prior but at the end of the day it’s on the mother she chose to go ahead with adoption with the defendant, even that she was actually negotiations with the second couple even though, if they said they went through the agency, they should’ve had a more formal agreement with the agency that should’ve been more binding, even though she declined months prior and they said they were usually go to the agency. I think she should’ve actually when she declined. She should’ve formally said I declined to adopt that third child on such such a date and that should’ve been legally finding because personally I think if they go through an agency that you only have one arrangement at a time that way you don’t have like multiple couples that that are vying for the same child and it doesn’t feel like you’re trying to buy a baby