Wrong answer. It doesn't sound like you listened to the case. You should NEVER make fun or light of anyone who has been in forster care. Little Miss Foster! Have you lost your damn mind?!
@@ladytee8540not if she’s living with the family in a single family residence. You would be correct if she was renting a separate apartment/unit from them, but they are all living together and homeowners insurance covers that. Her and their son were both living there together but only SHE was contributing towards the bills, and she gave him all the truck money to get another vehicle! If he’s living at home, rent free and can’t afford the truck still he’s a bum and mooching off his parents, unlike her who’s working and paying rent
@ I really do think it depends on the state. Renter insurance is not a requirement in the state of California, but there might be homeowners insurance gap when you’re renting a room in your house.
No good deed goes unpunished......I was a foster child and these foster parents went above and beyond goodness. I can't imagine that what they offered her was not good enough for her.
The narrator sounds ridiculous! This girl grew up in foster care…she isn’t a bad person…she isn’t a thief…she grew up in foster care that doesn’t mean she has to just be grateful and deal with the consequences of losing everything in their fire. I have had a fire…I know how it works! They tell you “get us receipts for everything” the more receipts you have the closer you get to the maximum payout. They told that girl to help them with receipts and then they didn’t want to give her a fair portion. You are clueless!
I don’t know if the parents didn’t understand but they shouldn’t have presented the plaintiffs claims to their insurance. She is not a family member she is a tenant. The insurance could request reimbursement, and then cancel their policy due to claims fraud. They could very well be out $2800 and insurance. 2) She should have had renter’s insurance regardless of her foster care background. The fact that she came from foster care has nothing to do with it. 3) She does sound ungrateful. If she paid market value for rent I doubt she’d have the money to buy two very expensive iPhones. (she doesn’t have a policy)
The narrator is a thief stole the videos that belong to judge Judy. We shouldn’t give him the satisfaction of commenting or clicking on to follow because he stole her videos. I am doing it this one time to warn people that he is a thief, they are not his videos they belong to judge Judy he stole them to benefit profit off her videos, instead of allowing him to benefit from stolen property follow judge Judy forget he exists report him as a scammer, thief because that is what he is . He didn’t get permission to steal her videos you can be sure of that. I hate it when people stoop this low to steal scam people who follow the thief’s they get paid money that they don’t deserve off stolen goods.
That family gave her a roof over her head for two years and probably dealt with her drama all during that time, the family also lost stuff in the fire and were probably really devastated by that, but they have to put all of that on hold to deal with the Plaintiff's drama and deal with this ridiculous list of stuff that all shouldn't have even been on there. Toothpaste, give me a break! She wasn't even on the insurance policy, so she should not have gotten anything, and since she is not even dating their son anymore, she should definitely just move on with her life!
We were foster parents at three different times in two different states. We decided not to accept any funds from the government and adjusted our budget and everything worked out well. Difficult? Every child is different and we felt very fortunate to be there for these children.
What she needs to do is contact the insurance company and report these people for insurance fraud. She didn't get justice, she was used as a toy for their son.
When the fire happened, they were all getting along. I'll bet if you look at that 2000 page spreadsheet, you'll find an awful lot of padding on there from the family, and I'll bet they're the ones who told her to pad her own claim since they're the ones who told her to submit the receipts. And now, the amount they want to pay is exactly the $6000 she submitted minus the amount they know she is going to win in the lawsuit against their son. So basically, the son pays her nothing.
If they have no proof , name or copies of said gift cards, Judge Judy shouldn’t be so willing to believe she got some form of subsidy. There are always three sides to the truth- hers/ theirs and somewhere everything in between. She needs to adjust but , I don’t take the parents side.
She doesn't have any proof that they got paid what she claimed. That's the issue. The padding just pissed the judge off enough not to try to press them on what they actually got paid for her claims. They all likely padded
I like your comments, calm and not showy. The plaintiff young lady must have endured lots of traumas during her foster years. I know of that lots of people from the foster system ended up in mental falicities. Life is hard.
Always have renters insurance. It is cheap and worth it. I think she should have been compensated for what she lost. Those who take money for rent usually protect their property. I think if they were as caring as they say they are, they would know that in the time she lived with them, she acquired things.
Actually this is the same advice when we had our flood. It’s advice from the onsite workers, it’s not like office level ppl. It’s my understanding that you have to backup the receipts with photographs (so you should take period photos of your home contents) for full reimbursement. This was not a case for JJ. She doesn’t have the patience to sort it out. She spent the whole time trying to find reasons to not award the plaintiff anything but all her answers were reasonable imho, which is why JJ decided to award what the defendants agreed to, as it is a form of contract. JJ was like, let’s dismiss the big things and let’s dismiss the small things is “bcuz I said so” vibes.
If she really want to be spoiled brat who was entitled. She could have told they're insurance claim she caught them setting the fire on purpose so they could claim the insurance money to go on a spending spree. The insurance would believe that and not give them a penny. So they better be careful who they run they're mouth to and about.
Judge Judy didn’t do well for this case either! Everyone is failing this girl! It doesn’t matter what items and when they were bought if you have receipts for body oil then you get the money back for that! Any possession you have in that house gets reimbursed!
It’s not a replay of the full episode which is a copyright infringement. The YT creator discusses their take on the case. Viewers share their comments in the comments section.
As a homeowner, unfortunately we are still responsible for other people living in your home. I think the girl was trying to take advantage of them. She’s lucky she was given the 2800 dollars.
The woman with the purple hair is SUCH a Karen “I feel like we didn’t owe her anything bcuz she didn’t have renters but I agree”. LADY, you let her live there. Did you require that she get renters? Why do you have to brown nose and agree with the judge’s decision but throw in a lecture about shoulda woulda coulda? Some ppl just talk too dam much and it exposes the holes in the story
If you was not there you really don’t how they treated her. Some people are just for the money of foster children then after the money is gone their treated diierent
She helped them in padding their insurance claim, they got paid and gave her nothing, and after braking up with their son and moving out she decided to sue them for padded items. I think Judge Judy got it right.
Nope, you and Judy are wrong on this one. She was entitled to everything she could produce receipts for. Having been through a flood myself and lost so much the insurance agency does ask you to go through EVERYTHING and document it and find the cost of it. They then reimburse you for that. She was paying rent doing the right thing produced the required receipt and only gave her a portion of what she produced. They kept the money because of the truck thing with the son. They were just being vengeful.
Both sides come off as a little shady. At the end the case, the plaintiff sounds reasonable but the defendant lady comes off as angry and nasty unjustly. Plaintiff doesn't seem like she came into the house with $6,000 worth of stuff- she didn't say any big items that were lost in the fire- except buying iphones for no reason. No need for her to buy another iphone, its odd the insurance company would say buy another phone even if its not damaged- something about that sounds very off.
It's not reasonable for the Plantiff to add a Toothbrush and Toothpaste to the claim, that makes her look ridiculous, and furthermore the Defendant's themselves probably lost a lot of stuff in that fire which is probably really devastating for them, but they had to put all of that on hold because the Plantiff started this drama. Keep in mind she wasn't even on the insurance policy, so she shouldn't get nothing, she should be greatful that she had a roof over her head!
So now we have a scammer stealing judge Judy’s videos to benefit off of her videos which is sickening to me , a thief is a thief then he has the nerve to show his sickening face of to the side to draw attention to his self, in the end has the nerve to shoot his mouth off show his face after stealing judge Judy’s videos benefit his self because judge Judy has a lot of followers. He has the nerve to judge others for taking advantage of others. I am making a statement against him this time will be the last because I am not an enabler by helping him to benefit off someone else’s work. He is a scammer, thief there is no other way of looking at it. He did not do no work to make judge Judy’s videos he just stole them. I will watch judge Judy’s videos not the ones he has stolen, thief should be behind bars.
Is the commentator a lawyer or someone competent to comment on these cases. Looks like he is also biased on some of his comments. He should lose his hat or cap.
People don’t rip good folks that are trying to help them!!!! Sorry she’s a foster child - you don’t go through life screwing over your friends and family!! You will never win!!!!!!!!!
Fact: Judge Judy introduced her as NOT having renters insurance. SHE cannot attach herself to someone else's insurance policy. IF they give her anything then they are volunteering. Also, the insurance will not repay "replacement" but they pay depreciated value based on THEIR LINE ITEM allowance. Does not make her automatically privy to the families INS settlement. THAT is why there is "Renters INS". Otherwise you have no coverage.
She lived WITH them, not in a separate unit they owned. Even if they’d had a guest in their home at the time of the fire, homeowners insurance would cover that loss. Paying rent makes her even more entitled
Wrong answer. It doesn't sound like you listened to the case. You should NEVER make fun or light of anyone who has been in forster care. Little Miss Foster! Have you lost your damn mind?!
The fact remains that her stuff was in the house. The homeowners insurance should cover her belongings!
Especially because the homeowners received more money for claiming HER belongings
She paid rent and didn't have anything to do with the fire...she should get replacement items just like the family
As a renter she needs renters insurance for her items to be replaced
@@ladytee8540not if she’s living with the family in a single family residence. You would be correct if she was renting a separate apartment/unit from them, but they are all living together and homeowners insurance covers that. Her and their son were both living there together but only SHE was contributing towards the bills, and she gave him all the truck money to get another vehicle! If he’s living at home, rent free and can’t afford the truck still he’s a bum and mooching off his parents, unlike her who’s working and paying rent
@ I really do think it depends on the state. Renter insurance is not a requirement in the state of California, but there might be homeowners insurance gap when you’re renting a room in your house.
I’m on the girl’s side!
Its called insurance fraud
No good deed goes unpunished......I was a foster child and these foster parents went above and beyond goodness. I can't imagine that what they offered her was not good enough for her.
Make that guy on the side of the screen go away!! He is Sooo annoying!
Big time
Youʻre watching something he posted on his YT channel…leave if you donʻt like him on the side. He watches the video…then comments on it.😮😮
The narrator sounds ridiculous! This girl grew up in foster care…she isn’t a bad person…she isn’t a thief…she grew up in foster care that doesn’t mean she has to just be grateful and deal with the consequences of losing everything in their fire. I have had a fire…I know how it works! They tell you “get us receipts for everything” the more receipts you have the closer you get to the maximum payout. They told that girl to help them with receipts and then they didn’t want to give her a fair portion. You are clueless!
I don’t know if the parents didn’t understand but they shouldn’t have presented the plaintiffs claims to their insurance. She is not a family member she is a tenant. The insurance could request reimbursement, and then cancel their policy due to claims fraud. They could very well be out $2800 and insurance.
2) She should have had renter’s insurance regardless of her foster care background. The fact that she came from foster care has nothing to do with it.
3) She does sound ungrateful. If she paid market value for rent I doubt she’d have the money to buy two very expensive iPhones. (she doesn’t have a policy)
The narrator is a thief stole the videos that belong to judge Judy. We shouldn’t give him the satisfaction of commenting or clicking on to follow because he stole her videos. I am doing it this one time to warn people that he is a thief, they are not his videos they belong to judge Judy he stole them to benefit profit off her videos, instead of allowing him to benefit from stolen property follow judge Judy forget he exists report him as a scammer, thief because that is what he is . He didn’t get permission to steal her videos you can be sure of that. I hate it when people stoop this low to steal scam people who follow the thief’s they get paid money that they don’t deserve off stolen goods.
That family gave her a roof over her head for two years and probably dealt with her drama all during that time, the family also lost stuff in the fire and were probably really devastated by that, but they have to put all of that on hold to deal with the Plaintiff's drama and deal with this ridiculous list of stuff that all shouldn't have even been on there. Toothpaste, give me a break! She wasn't even on the insurance policy, so she should not have gotten anything, and since she is not even dating their son anymore, she should definitely just move on with her life!
We were foster parents at three different times in two different states. We decided not to accept any funds from the government and adjusted our budget and everything worked out well. Difficult? Every child is different and we felt very fortunate to be there for these children.
This is insurance fraud and she put herself and the family on blast.
Being in foster care isnt easy, yes every dollar you earn before your on your own counts!
What she needs to do is contact the insurance company and report these people for insurance fraud. She didn't get justice, she was used as a toy for their son.
When the fire happened, they were all getting along. I'll bet if you look at that 2000 page spreadsheet, you'll find an awful lot of padding on there from the family, and I'll bet they're the ones who told her to pad her own claim since they're the ones who told her to submit the receipts. And now, the amount they want to pay is exactly the $6000 she submitted minus the amount they know she is going to win in the lawsuit against their son. So basically, the son pays her nothing.
Judge Judy is just too aggressive
Dont forget the state paid these people to take her in and let their son get involved??
If they have no proof , name or copies of said gift cards, Judge Judy shouldn’t be so willing to believe she got some form of subsidy. There are always three sides to the truth- hers/ theirs and somewhere everything in between. She needs to adjust but , I don’t take the parents side.
She doesn't have any proof that they got paid what she claimed. That's the issue. The padding just pissed the judge off enough not to try to press them on what they actually got paid for her claims. They all likely padded
Narrator.... wow what garbage you think.... those people ripped that girl off
I like your comments, calm and not showy. The plaintiff young lady must have endured lots of traumas during her foster years. I know of that lots of people from the foster system ended up in mental falicities. Life is hard.
Always have renters insurance. It is cheap and worth it. I think she should have been compensated for what she lost. Those who take money for rent usually protect their property. I think if they were as caring as they say they are, they would know that in the time she lived with them, she acquired things.
Actually this is the same advice when we had our flood. It’s advice from the onsite workers, it’s not like office level ppl. It’s my understanding that you have to backup the receipts with photographs (so you should take period photos of your home contents) for full reimbursement. This was not a case for JJ. She doesn’t have the patience to sort it out. She spent the whole time trying to find reasons to not award the plaintiff anything but all her answers were reasonable imho, which is why JJ decided to award what the defendants agreed to, as it is a form of contract. JJ was like, let’s dismiss the big things and let’s dismiss the small things is “bcuz I said so” vibes.
If she really want to be spoiled brat who was entitled. She could have told they're insurance claim she caught them setting the fire on purpose so they could claim the insurance money to go on a spending spree. The insurance would believe that and not give them a penny. So they better be careful who they run they're mouth to and about.
Judge Judy Rocks
Guess he missed it ...She paid Rent .
That makes her a renter who should have gotten renter’s insurance.
Judge Judy didn’t do well for this case either! Everyone is failing this girl! It doesn’t matter what items and when they were bought if you have receipts for body oil then you get the money back for that! Any possession you have in that house gets reimbursed!
If the Dennison's would have shared that file showing what the insurance paid for her receipts, this case wouldn't have occurred.
State of CA dept of Insurance does not include renters goods on the main homeowners policy- she should have had her own renters policy
But the homeowner Added HER belongings and it increased their claim payout, then they just kept it
Buddy you don’t have a clue!!!!!!
If you Google fire damage phone replacement it is suggested that you replace the phone because the internal parts can be compromised....you wrong Judy
Narrator, please be quiet!!
It’s not a replay of the full episode which is a copyright infringement. The YT creator discusses their take on the case. Viewers share their comments in the comments section.
The narrator knows nothing
As a homeowner, unfortunately we are still responsible for other people living in your home. I think the girl was trying to take advantage of them. She’s lucky she was given the 2800 dollars.
Why do we need a narrator? Just to get ratings!
It's how he can get monetized for stealing content
It's his page, he can do what he wants on it!
@@dapperguy0798 he's stealing a copyright material dude! Let him post something of HIS! Oh, I forgot, this is what he does.
She PAID RENT
Not all foster care is okay You don't know what was happening in that home
The woman with the purple hair is SUCH a Karen “I feel like we didn’t owe her anything bcuz she didn’t have renters but I agree”. LADY, you let her live there. Did you require that she get renters? Why do you have to brown nose and agree with the judge’s decision but throw in a lecture about shoulda woulda coulda? Some ppl just talk too dam much and it exposes the holes in the story
I think you missed the mark on this one
If you was not there you really don’t how they treated her. Some people are just for the money of foster children then after the money is gone their treated diierent
they're
She helped them in padding their insurance claim, they got paid and gave her nothing, and after braking up with their son and moving out she decided to sue them for padded items. I think Judge Judy got it right.
This narrator only posts videos of situations where he thinks the woman is at fault. He’s very insecure and it helps him to put women down.
The one with purple hair looks just like" Jen the realinfluence"
Is this a foster parent situation or was she living there with her boyfriend?????
Nope, you and Judy are wrong on this one. She was entitled to everything she could produce receipts for. Having been through a flood myself and lost so much the insurance agency does ask you to go through EVERYTHING and document it and find the cost of it. They then reimburse you for that. She was paying rent doing the right thing produced the required receipt and only gave her a portion of what she produced. They kept the money because of the truck thing with the son. They were just being vengeful.
Both sides come off as a little shady. At the end the case, the plaintiff sounds reasonable but the defendant lady comes off as angry and nasty unjustly. Plaintiff doesn't seem like she came into the house with $6,000 worth of stuff- she didn't say any big items that were lost in the fire- except buying iphones for no reason. No need for her to buy another iphone, its odd the insurance company would say buy another phone even if its not damaged- something about that sounds very off.
It's not reasonable for the Plantiff to add a Toothbrush and Toothpaste to the claim, that makes her look ridiculous, and furthermore the Defendant's themselves probably lost a lot of stuff in that fire which is probably really devastating for them, but they had to put all of that on hold because the Plantiff started this drama. Keep in mind she wasn't even on the insurance policy, so she shouldn't get nothing, she should be greatful that she had a roof over her head!
What a different case.
So now we have a scammer stealing judge Judy’s videos to benefit off of her videos which is sickening to me , a thief is a thief then he has the nerve to show his sickening face of to the side to draw attention to his self, in the end has the nerve to shoot his mouth off show his face after stealing judge Judy’s videos benefit his self because judge Judy has a lot of followers. He has the nerve to judge others for taking advantage of others. I am making a statement against him this time will be the last because I am not an enabler by helping him to benefit off someone else’s work. He is a scammer, thief there is no other way of looking at it. He did not do no work to make judge Judy’s videos he just stole them. I will watch judge Judy’s videos not the ones he has stolen, thief should be behind bars.
Baughtin is not a word
I have but furniture, electronics, fridge and clothes
electronical
Good boy som talk👍👊👊👊👊❤️🇸🇪
Is the commentator a lawyer or someone competent to comment on these cases. Looks like he is also biased on some of his comments. He should lose his hat or cap.
Miss Bird..🙏❤️🏆🇸🇪
4 I phones ??? Wow 😮
This is a tough one
People don’t rip good folks that are trying to help them!!!! Sorry she’s a foster child - you don’t go through life screwing over your friends and family!! You will never win!!!!!!!!!
THE SON LOOKS LIKE YOU ZECH
Who is that guy on the side.😂😂😂
kenken-bl6if
The guy in the baseball cap ? This is his channel.
You had watched the video before, you film yourself watching this. Why are you acting as if you are seeing it for the first time?
Wow
She saw a lottery win. Wicked! New phones!!!! Wow
Did u watch the show for the foster girl.... No u r wrong, sorry
This narrator needs to find new content. He takes up half the screen just listening.
Fact: Judge Judy introduced her as NOT having renters insurance. SHE cannot attach herself to someone else's insurance policy. IF they give her anything then they are volunteering. Also, the insurance will not repay "replacement" but they pay depreciated value based on THEIR LINE ITEM allowance. Does not make her automatically privy to the families INS settlement. THAT is why there is "Renters INS". Otherwise you have no coverage.
Good channel. Like the limited comments and good commentary
She's a scammer. Did she ever pay the insurance?
She lived WITH them, not in a separate unit they owned. Even if they’d had a guest in their home at the time of the fire, homeowners insurance would cover that loss. Paying rent makes her even more entitled
She did not deserve the 2800$. JH was generous with this scammer.