@@vincemzd3 wow seems faster than my 2017 3 2.0L! Must get a bit more power out of the manual transmission cause they didn’t change the engine in anyway I don’t think
@@mattheww1779 there si sa big difference manual vs automatic because they use torque converter, not the dual clutch system. I've got CX-30 and the spec is 2.0, 150 BHP 0-100 8.8sec. But if you take the same engine with automatic, it takes a bit more than 10 sec from 0 to 100... the same as 122 Bhp version with manual. To sum it up, torque converter costs you acceleration but its better in city driving compared to dual clutch or manual...
Is this the 2.0 or the 2.5??
2.0
@@vincemzd3 wow seems faster than my 2017 3 2.0L! Must get a bit more power out of the manual transmission cause they didn’t change the engine in anyway I don’t think
@@mattheww1779 there si sa big difference manual vs automatic because they use torque converter, not the dual clutch system. I've got CX-30 and the spec is 2.0, 150 BHP 0-100 8.8sec. But if you take the same engine with automatic, it takes a bit more than 10 sec from 0 to 100... the same as 122 Bhp version with manual. To sum it up, torque converter costs you acceleration but its better in city driving compared to dual clutch or manual...
155hp?