@@chrisrodriguez388 He's a Karen because he thinks you're an asshole for violating the vehicle code AND doing so with your car to a pedestrian. Don't be an asshole just wait a second and keep your car away from people.
We 💜 Stanley! Here in NJ, if you wait for the person to completely cross the street, the cars behind you will start beeping and shouting and trying to go around you. The roads are full of entitled jerks here.
Exactly my thought. Hell they don't even wait until I checked traffic in both directions when the light turns green to start honking. In that case, I check it TWICE!
At Chambers Bridge Rd and Ovation Way there are 'NO TURN ON RED" signs, People only think it's just a suggestion and they can do what every they want, even turn right on red. There is the NO LEFT TURN SIGN in front of McDonald's but I see drivers still make that left to go into McDonald's. I see people walk on the red light because the light is too long. Some cross at the left arrow while cars are trying to make a left turn. (Who's at fault when a driver really has the right away if the pedestrian does not follow the rules (jaywalks)?) I see drivers come out of the post office onto Ovation Way and it's enter only. Not all but most of these drivers are driving very expensive cars. That I think gives them a big head. They can break the rules and the rules do not apply to the wealthy here in NJ. One person was making an illegal right on red and they gave me the NJ salute. (person was driving a very expensive car)
@@crazyknarf Years ago, on a dark, stormy night, one of my friends accidentally hit and killed a jaywalker who had darted out from between two parked cars. He was found not at fault. And you’re right, it seems the wealthier, the more entitled. Both heading out and going home last night I had fancy cars tailgating me. I don’t brake-check; rather, I simply take my foot off the accelerator and sloooooooow down haha.
I still think this is weird. In the United States, you build massive streets with lots of lanes and then expect drivers to spot pedestrians far away. In Switzerland, our streets have much fewer lanes. AND we build little ''pedestrian islands'' in the middle of the road, where pedestrians are protected from traffic by posts and the raised walkway. Each part of the pedestrian crossing is treated as an individual crossing, so drivers on one side of the street are allowed to continue driving when the person has reached the island to cross the other side of the street. Maybe something you should consider introducing too! Best regards from Switzerland!
@A K Thank you, I'm aware of that. Maybe you misunderstood me. I don't think it's weird that you build massive streets. I think it's weird and dangerous that there are unprotected crosswalks for pedestrians who want to cross these massive streets.
This usually wouldn’t work because most of our roads don’t have any kind of raised medium in the center. As much as I think U.S. road infrastructure lacks in a lot of areas compared to other nations, crosswalks are definitely not one of them. Every single crosswalk is clearly marked ahead of time, based on the speed limit and visibility, and drivers all have plenty of time to see the pedestrian and stop. The real problem is the poor driver education, which is basically a 30 day high school class where people go vape in the bathroom and cheat on the easiest tests on the planet, then go pickup a drivers license and hit the road. I can assure you it’s never “Oh I didn’t see that person”, and if it is the driver was usually distracted on their phone or something
Pedestrian islands like the ones you refer to are becoming more common in the USA, I’ve also seen a few newer roads that have crosswalks that are raised up and you have to slow down to cross. We are getting better, but are definitely still lacking in terms of pedestrian infrastructure
I really don’t see the safety gain that law is trying to give. If you wait for them and then cross behind them, I don’t see why that’s dangerous for them if you don’t get within 10 feet of them. They aren’t suddenly going to glitch out and appear 20 feet behind. If they were a reasonable distance forward (at least a lane) when you started the turn, they only get further as they continue to walk. If that law applied somewhere with lots of pedestrians, it would not ever be possible to turn. That law doesn’t make any sense for roads two lanes or wider in each direction.
I think it's stupid the way it's enforced because I don't see anything unsafe about going thru an intersection if the guy is on the other side of the street. There's no danger to the pedestrian Now if he was coming my way I definitely would have stopped and waited for him.no if, ands,or buts. But the way it's enforced I think needs to change
american roads are not suited for pedestrians anyway. Its like ur waiting to get hit when you use crosswalks. Anyway, imo the whole driving license schooling system needs a redo. it would save so many accidents and deaths if most people actually had some proper teaching
And doesn't tell us if it's the same when they're walking towards you in the crosswalk...Are you supposed to stop when they have passed the opposite lanes of travel, or when the enter the crosswalk on the complete other side of the street?? How do they expect everyone to know every little detail of the traffic laws, that are different when you go into Mesa, Tempe, or Gilbert, or Scottsdale???
Gross misinterpretation of the law. AZ statute says vehicle must yield on their half of the road by stopping or slowing down. It does NOT say the vehicle must remain stopped.
I had a Co-worker/ friend of mine that was Hit by a vehicle in a marked crosswalk at a traffic Light. The Driver took off and fled Police was notified but nothing was done and No report was given Plus on the sad note no witness.
28-792. Right-of-way at crosswalk A. Except as provided in section 28-793, subsection B, if traffic control signals are not in place or are not in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way, slowing down or stopping if need be in order to yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalk when the pedestrian is on the half of the roadway on which the vehicle is traveling or when the pedestrian is approaching so closely from the opposite half of the roadway as to be in danger. A pedestrian shall not suddenly leave any curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle that is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield.
I do not agree I'm a pedestrian and a driver if the person crossing is completely out of your turning lane there is absolutely no reason for you not to turn and by the way love the see the police officer riding is motorcycle on the grass thru the sidewalk good example of safety nothing like looking for tickets by the way they should be painting the crosswalk like it should be
1:00 What is this dumb law? The guy had already passed and had 1 meter distance between the car while it was moving at really low speed. Thats not how it should be enforced.
Nah. I've been hit this way. Most don't even look or give them distance. It doesn't matter. What if they stop to catch their breath or they are elderly? Something as simple as tying your shoe and bam.
What a terrible explanation. They need tell the offenders that they have to wait until the pedestrian crosses the double yellow lines. This causes people to the not make right hand turns until the pedestrian steps on to side walk on the other side of the street.
Sorry, I have to agree with the money grab argument here. The car at :38 was “doing it right” and the car at :42 “wasn’t”? The pedestrian was in the same spot in the crosswalk. The drivers in both situation DID yield. Absolutely if the pedestrian couldn’t cross, yes, ticket the driver. However, all the footage I saw, the pedestrian had clearly moved from the travel lane. This is a cash grab.
The first car, the pedestrian had just made it past the median on the other side. The 42 second car, the pedestrian was just before the median on the side of road the driver was turning on to. But still, I feel like these drivers should get warnings instead of tickets
Hey idiot this isn't a money grab this is for the safety of the pedestrians if you learn to properly yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk then you shouldn't be driving.
@@sl3712 The drivers in the video deserve traffic tickets if you don't want to pay traffic tickets then don't break traffic laws or don't drive that's simple.
Stephen Sullivan >>> And what makes you the self righteous zealot? Like you’ve never ever made a mistake behind the wheel? Give me a break! Pedestrians don’t deserve such preferential treatment. You make too much of an effort to defend them.
Stanley where every you on these police stings people are getting caught. See you can't fix stupid. Where did People get their drivers license at a Kmart blue light special.
What a waste of time. Of all the things to nitpick, Jesus. How about people who run red lights, or drive aggressively? No, lets pull people over for making a turn 5 feet too early after yielding to a pedestrian.
@@viklawry7326 In the video, person has already crossed that direction of the road. If there is continuous movement of pedestrians every 20s and it takes 20s to clear those huge road width, there should not be any movement of vehicles? This is a slight exaggeration but I hope you get my point. Try to catch the drivers who don't allow the pedestrian to cross that are already half way through and hence vulnerable.
Did the cops not break the law by driving on the sidewalk and private property grass to pull these people over. Pedestrian yeild laws are rediculas and make people think they can just walk out in front of you and then stare at you like you did something wrong when you slam on the brakes and avoid hitting them.
BS If it’s about public safety they would be passing out knowledge and warnings instead of charging money for basically a technicality. Those people obviously “yielded” to the pedestrian, if we’re still going by the definition of words these days. It’s a racket and this is propaganda to normalize tax collectors disguised as police officers.
Don't tell this to anyone. This is top secret information only president of USA has access to. You can avoid getting ticked by not breaking any road rules or laws. Please, don't tell anyone else about this.
Always remember we must repent of our sins (sin is transgression The Law Of Yahuah The Father in Heaven. The Law are The Books: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy). We must repent of our sins and Have Belief On Yahusha The Messiah. HE Died and Rose three days later so that we can be forgiven of our sins! Come to HIM🙂🙂🙂🙂
that law sucks. Should be, if pedestrian is in your direction , you stop. For example, lets say you have two north bound lanes and two south bound lanes. If pedestrian is through two of the north bound lanes, then those drivers can go, but not the other side until the pedestrian crosses. In my town, most of the pedestrians are alcoholics and drug addicts. They run right through the crosswalk with no warning. They often get hit. Drivers dont have time to stop.
Pay attention? are you fucking crazy. I have five things going on at once and you are telling me to pay attention. What, are you paying me or something? @@jjknott1591
Boy if you cant see a bunch of motorcycle cops at the corner and instantly put 2 and 2 together you deserve the ticket
Of course it's always "Me! Me! Me!" to you entitled little brats. Just because you drive 2020 Doge Demon doesn't give you a right to break the law.
Thanks, Karen. Tell your mom that her and I will put 2 and 2 together later. 🤗
@@chrisrodriguez388 He's a Karen because he thinks you're an asshole for violating the vehicle code AND doing so with your car to a pedestrian. Don't be an asshole just wait a second and keep your car away from people.
We 💜 Stanley!
Here in NJ, if you wait for the person to completely cross the street, the cars behind you will start beeping and shouting and trying to go around you. The roads are full of entitled jerks here.
Exactly my thought.
Hell they don't even wait until I checked traffic in both directions when the light turns green to start honking.
In that case, I check it TWICE!
yes.
At Chambers Bridge Rd and Ovation Way there are 'NO TURN ON RED" signs, People only think it's just a suggestion and they can do what every they want, even turn right on red.
There is the NO LEFT TURN SIGN in front of McDonald's but I see drivers still make that left to go into McDonald's.
I see people walk on the red light because the light is too long. Some cross at the left arrow while cars are trying to make a left turn.
(Who's at fault when a driver really has the right away if the pedestrian does not follow the rules (jaywalks)?)
I see drivers come out of the post office onto Ovation Way and it's enter only.
Not all but most of these drivers are driving very expensive cars. That I think gives them a big head. They can break the rules and the rules do not apply to the wealthy here in NJ. One person was making an illegal right on red and they gave me the NJ salute. (person was driving a very expensive car)
@@crazyknarf Years ago, on a dark, stormy night, one of my friends accidentally hit and killed a jaywalker who had darted out from between two parked cars. He was found not at fault.
And you’re right, it seems the wealthier, the more entitled. Both heading out and going home last night I had fancy cars tailgating me. I don’t brake-check; rather, I simply take my foot off the accelerator and sloooooooow down haha.
I wish the police do this more often, actually promotes public safety
I still think this is weird. In the United States, you build massive streets with lots of lanes and then expect drivers to spot pedestrians far away. In Switzerland, our streets have much fewer lanes. AND we build little ''pedestrian islands'' in the middle of the road, where pedestrians are protected from traffic by posts and the raised walkway. Each part of the pedestrian crossing is treated as an individual crossing, so drivers on one side of the street are allowed to continue driving when the person has reached the island to cross the other side of the street. Maybe something you should consider introducing too! Best regards from Switzerland!
@A K Thank you, I'm aware of that. Maybe you misunderstood me. I don't think it's weird that you build massive streets. I think it's weird and dangerous that there are unprotected crosswalks for pedestrians who want to cross these massive streets.
Given out tickets to motorists,is mostly about the city getting revenue than safety.
This usually wouldn’t work because most of our roads don’t have any kind of raised medium in the center. As much as I think U.S. road infrastructure lacks in a lot of areas compared to other nations, crosswalks are definitely not one of them. Every single crosswalk is clearly marked ahead of time, based on the speed limit and visibility, and drivers all have plenty of time to see the pedestrian and stop. The real problem is the poor driver education, which is basically a 30 day high school class where people go vape in the bathroom and cheat on the easiest tests on the planet, then go pickup a drivers license and hit the road. I can assure you it’s never “Oh I didn’t see that person”, and if it is the driver was usually distracted on their phone or something
Pedestrian islands like the ones you refer to are becoming more common in the USA, I’ve also seen a few newer roads that have crosswalks that are raised up and you have to slow down to cross. We are getting better, but are definitely still lacking in terms of pedestrian infrastructure
Yup. Its like a person riding his bicycle doing 5mph on a 45mph. Its the equivalent to someone walking on the street.
I really don’t see the safety gain that law is trying to give. If you wait for them and then cross behind them, I don’t see why that’s dangerous for them if you don’t get within 10 feet of them. They aren’t suddenly going to glitch out and appear 20 feet behind. If they were a reasonable distance forward (at least a lane) when you started the turn, they only get further as they continue to walk. If that law applied somewhere with lots of pedestrians, it would not ever be possible to turn. That law doesn’t make any sense for roads two lanes or wider in each direction.
Where would you draw the line ? Most people think 10 feet is something that belongs to 5 people. The law is fine, as it is.
I think it's stupid the way it's enforced because I don't see anything unsafe about going thru an intersection if the guy is on the other side of the street.
There's no danger to the pedestrian
Now if he was coming my way I definitely would have stopped and waited for him.no if, ands,or buts.
But the way it's enforced I think needs to change
american roads are not suited for pedestrians anyway. Its like ur waiting to get hit when you use crosswalks. Anyway, imo the whole driving license schooling system needs a redo. it would save so many accidents and deaths if most people actually had some proper teaching
1:33 The reporter literally said the pedestrian has to be out of your roadway before you can drive through the intersection. XD
And doesn't tell us if it's the same when they're walking towards you in the crosswalk...Are you supposed to stop when they have passed the opposite lanes of travel, or when the enter the crosswalk on the complete other side of the street?? How do they expect everyone to know every little detail of the traffic laws, that are different when you go into Mesa, Tempe, or Gilbert, or Scottsdale???
Gross misinterpretation of the law. AZ statute says vehicle must yield on their half of the road by stopping or slowing down. It does NOT say the vehicle must remain stopped.
Not to mention, entrapment
@@manuelreyes2795 I can usually tell by the smell, and this one stinks.
If a car goes past behind the pedestrian, what the heck !
The police officer says you can do this, but you have to wait to get some distance.
@@dennisbeier4011 Officer said that they have to be past the center line of the road.
Actually wondered where the printer would be lol
Those people need to go back to driver's Ed and pay attention this time on crosswalk safety.
All the way across? Why! Isn’t that extreme. They should do those mot yielding right at them. Man.
This should be done often in all countries.
I had a Co-worker/ friend of mine that was Hit by a vehicle in a marked crosswalk at a traffic Light. The Driver took off and fled Police was notified but nothing was done and No report was given Plus on the sad note no witness.
28-792. Right-of-way at crosswalk
A. Except as provided in section 28-793, subsection B, if traffic control signals are not in place or are not in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way, slowing down or stopping if need be in order to yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalk when the pedestrian is on the half of the roadway on which the vehicle is traveling or when the pedestrian is approaching so closely from the opposite half of the roadway as to be in danger. A pedestrian shall not suddenly leave any curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle that is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield.
There is no law requiring to wait until fully crossed.
@@traffic.engineer There should be. Anyone could stop or drop something, or have trouble crossing. It's just common sense
Maybe written tests given every time you renew license
They need to do this more often especially in little cities
Love to see more like this video.
I do not agree I'm a pedestrian and a driver if the person crossing is completely out of your turning lane there is absolutely no reason for you not to turn and by the way love the see the police officer riding is motorcycle on the grass thru the sidewalk good example of safety nothing like looking for tickets by the way they should be painting the crosswalk like it should be
Woah didn't know Jacksepticeye got into broadcast television.
that’s bs
If people would hurry the hell up walking, people wouldnt be so impatient..
Don’t blame your bad time management on strangers who don’t care about you.
Government stupidly at it's finest.
Was the "bate" injured or threatened?
When did Stanley moved to AZ. He has always been on KRON4 in San Francisco. People Behaving Badly.
Most drivers do this. I’ve been almost hit by a car so many times with this scenario.
is it the same in Cali?
Yes.
No in CA you have to wait until they get to the other side
@@Sean-C That sucks because no one actually follows that
1:00
What is this dumb law? The guy had already passed and had 1 meter distance between the car while it was moving at really low speed.
Thats not how it should be enforced.
the law is the law, I bet you would've been one of the ones getting ticketed
Nah. I've been hit this way. Most don't even look or give them distance. It doesn't matter. What if they stop to catch their breath or they are elderly? Something as simple as tying your shoe and bam.
I'm afraid of the crosswalks I know of folks who been run over. It's the most dangerous during rush hour.
How about the fact that it looks an awfully lot like the officer in the crosswalk was crossing on a don't walk signal. Looks like entrapment to me.
Entrapment
What a terrible explanation. They need tell the offenders that they have to wait until the pedestrian crosses the double yellow lines. This causes people to the not make right hand turns until the pedestrian steps on to side walk on the other side of the street.
I California its the entire street
No, it's not.
If you want to get the point across just make everything a felony traffic stop. That will teach those misbehaviors. Lol
1:28 Ohhhhhhhhhh...so sorry!
Good job keeping pedestrians safe Stanley!
I’m sorry but Stanley Roberts will always be well known as people behaving Badly
SCAM
Sorry, I have to agree with the money grab argument here. The car at :38 was “doing it right” and the car at :42 “wasn’t”? The pedestrian was in the same spot in the crosswalk. The drivers in both situation DID yield. Absolutely if the pedestrian couldn’t cross, yes, ticket the driver. However, all the footage I saw, the pedestrian had clearly moved from the travel lane. This is a cash grab.
The first car, the pedestrian had just made it past the median on the other side. The 42 second car, the pedestrian was just before the median on the side of road the driver was turning on to. But still, I feel like these drivers should get warnings instead of tickets
Hey idiot this isn't a money grab this is for the safety of the pedestrians if you learn to properly yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk then you shouldn't be driving.
@@sl3712 The drivers in the video deserve traffic tickets if you don't want to pay traffic tickets then don't break traffic laws or don't drive that's simple.
Stephen Sullivan >>> And what makes you the self righteous zealot? Like you’ve never ever made a mistake behind the wheel? Give me a break!
Pedestrians don’t deserve such preferential treatment. You make too much of an effort to defend them.
@@WesternSouthDakotaRailfan2006 If you're lucky, you'll make it to " boomer level " Do you feel lucky ?
Stanley where every you on these police stings people are getting caught. See you can't fix stupid. Where did People get their drivers license at a Kmart blue light special.
Love the dress.
I love your profile picture.
What a waste of time. Of all the things to nitpick, Jesus. How about people who run red lights, or drive aggressively? No, lets pull people over for making a turn 5 feet too early after yielding to a pedestrian.
Wtf theres so much space between the car and the pedestrian i don't understand really...
This is what's wrong with the world today! WAY TOO MANY RULES...
How is it too many rules. How dose one person supposed to cross the street. When morons like you won't stop.
@@viklawry7326 In the video, person has already crossed that direction of the road. If there is continuous movement of pedestrians every 20s and it takes 20s to clear those huge road width, there should not be any movement of vehicles? This is a slight exaggeration but I hope you get my point. Try to catch the drivers who don't allow the pedestrian to cross that are already half way through and hence vulnerable.
Did the cops not break the law by driving on the sidewalk and private property grass to pull these people over. Pedestrian yeild laws are rediculas and make people think they can just walk out in front of you and then stare at you like you did something wrong when you slam on the brakes and avoid hitting them.
Not sure I agree with this use of taxpayer funds.
I love watching cops break traffic laws to carch people to give out traffic tickets 🤦🏾♀️
Examples?
BS If it’s about public safety they would be passing out knowledge and warnings instead of charging money for basically a technicality.
Those people obviously “yielded” to the pedestrian, if we’re still going by the definition of words these days.
It’s a racket and this is propaganda to normalize tax collectors disguised as police officers.
Don't tell this to anyone. This is top secret information only president of USA has access to.
You can avoid getting ticked by not breaking any road rules or laws.
Please, don't tell anyone else about this.
200 bucks is wild
Always remember we must repent of our sins (sin is transgression The Law Of Yahuah The Father in Heaven. The Law are The Books: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy). We must repent of our sins and Have Belief On Yahusha The Messiah. HE Died and Rose three days later so that we can be forgiven of our sins!
Come to HIM🙂🙂🙂🙂
that law sucks. Should be, if pedestrian is in your direction , you stop. For example, lets say you have two north bound lanes and two south bound lanes. If pedestrian is through two of the north bound lanes, then those drivers can go, but not the other side until the pedestrian crosses. In my town, most of the pedestrians are alcoholics and drug addicts. They run right through the crosswalk with no warning. They often get hit. Drivers dont have time to stop.
that’s literally what they said in the video. Pay attention
Pay attention? are you fucking crazy. I have five things going on at once and you are telling me to pay attention. What, are you paying me or something? @@jjknott1591
That's exacly what is shown in video. You can see if you compare 0:38 and 0:42.
Year after year, week after week now in two states Stanley, No one cares Stanley, they really don't.
Hey idiot if you don't like Stanley's videos then don't watch get off of this channel you troll.
Because your lifted pickup "truck" with shiny, polished bed makes you more important than others?