It sort of can. Medium format used to have a huge resolution advantage over full frame back in the film days, which is about 5x the size of full frame. You could visibly see the difference in even small prints. Now, medium format is 1.7x bigger than full frame and the only way you can tell the difference is by blowing up an image to 400% on a monitor. Regardless of the increased resolution, the look of the picture is the same.
Interestingly, I thought it was a great camera as well, but I actually didn't like the big viewfinder that sticks out and I know that you can take it off but I thought it would also just get knocked on something so I waited for the smaller more compact 100s ii and literally I've only owned the camera for three days, but I love it. It weighs only 883 g which is probably 200 g lighter than than the II .... I'm glad I waited as I saved about $3000 in Australia on cost between the two cameras as well. I think both cameras are brilliant and I know they are expensive people but you only live once.
If you have choice to choose between nikon zf vs canon r6 vs Sony a7c in terms of performance only based on photography without seeing lens selection, ergonomic. It will more helpful if you able make a full comparison video.I will very greatful seeing your reply love from India
buy this camera or hasselblad x2d 100c ? i want to buy it
Did fijifilm make you pay half deposit for 28 days ???
Laney Junction
full frame can not compare the medium format in every detail.
It sort of can. Medium format used to have a huge resolution advantage over full frame back in the film days, which is about 5x the size of full frame. You could visibly see the difference in even small prints. Now, medium format is 1.7x bigger than full frame and the only way you can tell the difference is by blowing up an image to 400% on a monitor. Regardless of the increased resolution, the look of the picture is the same.
Pretty close in price to Hassleblad...🙂I am wondering about large prints from each.
That would be a great thing to compare.
@@TheSlantedLens 16 X 20 for close viewing, GFX , Hassleblad, Z8 and Sony A7R V , Canon r5 Mark II . I hope it happens.
For people, you probably would have gotten better AF performance with one of the LM lenses.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Incredible images, beautiful colours, very impressive!
Interestingly, I thought it was a great camera as well, but I actually didn't like the big viewfinder that sticks out and I know that you can take it off but I thought it would also just get knocked on something so I waited for the smaller more compact 100s ii and literally I've only owned the camera for three days, but I love it. It weighs only 883 g which is probably 200 g lighter than than the II .... I'm glad I waited as I saved about $3000 in Australia on cost between the two cameras as well. I think both cameras are brilliant and I know they are expensive people but you only live once.
shutter sound is quiet nice on the 50S II. likely just as nice here
If you have choice to choose between nikon zf vs canon r6 vs Sony a7c in terms of performance only based on photography without seeing lens selection, ergonomic. It will more helpful if you able make a full comparison video.I will very greatful seeing your reply
love from India
This one talks about the R6: th-cam.com/video/eTju1Pdn2JQ/w-d-xo.html
and this one talks about the a7c: th-cam.com/video/oR-X6bSGE2Y/w-d-xo.html