Shooting 400MP Photos on the $10,000 GFX100 (Fujifilm GFX100 Pixel Shift)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2021
- The first 1000 people to use the link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/zyproductions01211
The GFX100 was insane for doing 100MP...but now it also does 400MP!
Watch Jayz’s 400MP video here on the @lenslibrary channel:
• Do You Need 400 Megapi...
Download 400MP JPEGs here:
drive.google.com/drive/folder...
___________________________________________________
Gear I use to film my TH-cam videos:
kit.co/zyproductions/youtube-...
Support me on Patreon!
/ zyproductions Subscribe to Adobe Creative Cloud:
clk.tradedoubler.com/click?p(...)
Where I get my music from:
artlist.io/artlist-70446/?art...
"Takes a 400MP shot"
"Posts it on Instagram"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Peter lik does this all the time I'm sure
Imagine the storage requirements if they’re didn’t put caps on data size
@@minuteman259 I have a Insta mod that removes those Caps.
@@fa14bi-78 no you don't lmfao the limit isn't client-side so that's not anywhere near how that works
this camera combined with a macro lens lets you see bacteriums
Tesco Virus
If you make a deal with the bacteria to sit perfectly still
Omggggggggggggggggggggg
@@esbensteen5412 agree 🤣
with the mark ii you can take pics of stuff that are in subatomic sizes.
The megapixel count isn’t even the most shocking thing, the fact that the lens is so ridiculously sharp to that level of magnification is insane.
Not exactly. Pixel shifting doesn't increase lens resolving power, it takes multiple shots with the sensor shifted. So if this was a 400mp camera rather than a 100mp one, the results would be worse. It's all semantics though, because with any camera you can get this level of detail, it just takes more work and stitching shots.
Agreed bro.
lens generates a flow of light. it can't be sharp or not sharp. any lens that is focused on something gives a light. the main work is to absorb the most of this flow of light in a small amount of time on a surface. thats where MP counts. so its fully the work of matrix
It essentially halves the pixel pitch from 3.7 to 1.8.. you need 190lp/mm to utilize 1.8micron pixels. Its pretty much the best that current optics can possibly do. The largest noticeable effect comes from having full RGB info. In bayer sensors the megapixel ratings are misleading, a 100mp bayer sensor is only 33mp sensor in color (rest is interpolated). One pixel is actually 4 pixels on the sensor. So the bayer sensor basically has 7.4micron pixels. Pixels that big only can utilize around 50lp/mm resolving power from the lens.
It does not go exactly like this, as bayers are asymmetric.. having twice as many green pixels as blue & red pixels.
@@ilyasnamozov2914 eat less acid :) its exactly the lens that can be sharp. MP only defines the image size. Its about the pixel pitch & lens resolution.
I can't wait for 20 years from now when I can buy this for $1k and take pictures of my bookshelves
second this
Let's hope for 5 years! I want to be alive when this gets down to 1K. Remember: we also need a lens ...
LOL
its now 2024 and they are going for 3kish on the used market lol
Me watching on 720p shitphone : hmm yeah, very noticeable...
I can supposively shoot 8k on my phone but can only view upto 2k resolution. Makes no sence to me so I just do 4k and watch yt at 1440p
Me! 😂
@@ItsPinecone_911 shitphone. I like it
@@tfr lol
@@ItsPinecone_911 liar what kinda phone shoots 8k
Dude! I pity your computer for the editing part 😂
You should’ve heard the fans on that thing, sounded like a jet!
@@zy_cheng what are you using for editing? program and machine? I use a S1H and a canon eos r5 and Premiere and 32 core threadripper
agree....two weeks for one picture edition...
He uses a Mac, not a real computer
now we have an apple silicon chip 🤪
As a professional dust photographer I'm really taking this camera into consideration after seeing this marvelous review
Macro lens would've been insane. Wish you had on3
Images produced by this camera are so sharp they will cut you eyeballs in half
-Fuji APSC: Hey baby, am I enough for you 😕
-The girlfriend: Yeah sure baby, don't worry about that.
-The GFX in her dm's: 😏
Hasselblad H6D in her tinder: 😈
So cool, really happy you liked my Skillshare course, thank you so much for promoting! 😍
Thanks for dropping by Amelie! And your course is really awesome!
My A7R4 does 244 MP shots. The details are mind boggling, just like this.
does it also do pixel shift ?
@@marknorris3769 - Yes. But you need Capture 20 software to align and merge the multiple files into a single file.
@@mattsnider5704 Imaging Edge should do it as well, right?
@richardhalo - No. Got it on sale. Capture One was $120.
@@Dr.LaserBeam - I don’t know if Imaging Edge allows for that. I think it is only available in Capture One.
Me: finally buys a GFX 100.
*Uses it to look at dust on the various things in my room*
🤣🤣🤣
If you ever slightly have OCD that's triggering. I prolly wont stop cleaning....
*If you put on a macro lens, you will see individual molecules!*
I don't usually comment, but damn that detail is insane boi
"If you don't shoot at 400mp then you can't see the details in the bits of dust."
I think I can live without!
The technology is impressive... It also shows just how good GF lenses are.
i need to tell myself: I dont need this, my fuji APSC is just fine
At work we have a phase one 100mp and a new fuji gfx 100 since a few days ago now and I work on 100mp files on a daily basis. I wouldn´t trade my private fuji apsc cameras and lenses for systems like that, because my fuji x-t3 actually IS JUST FINE in the best way.
Like Yoda said:
With higher resolution comes great responsibility. ;)
@@ThisIsWideAngle I would LOVE the GFX especially since it shoots 4k 30p as well AND has IBIS. But for the work I do the XT3 is such a workhorse and I love it and will keep mind for quite some time.
and a large format view camera with portra 400....
Now imagine Fuji introduces a 1:1 reproduction ratio macro lens, and then use that with the pixel shift function to digitize a 6x6 film negative by stitching parts of the photographed negative together......
that would be insaaaane. maybe you could even see the individual light sensitive corns in some high iso films like on a delta 3200 🤤🤤🤤
@@samsonkipp probably so! I use Nikon D800 to digitize film negatives, and the results are already mind blowing. I could get ~56MP for each frame after stitching.
This would be my dream lens and camera combo if this happened.
iXG with 100/150 Mpx's, 1×120mm Scheider-Kreutznach and 3-4 extensions are just enough for 6×6 w/o stitching 🤤
BTW ROI is significant in such cases, Fuji/Sony etc does not guarantee a sufficiently long mechanical shutter life (when I mean sufficiently >2-10 mio shots)
@@miroslavkhodl2665 it's all for the sake of having a 1GB scan file ;)
I am beyond amped to get this camera. The fact that made this a feature and it's something I already do manually is going to save so much time and make for an overall better image. Appreciate the video demo!
this camera:- 407 MP
human eye at 576 MP:- this shit is getting close real fast
Thank you for always providing entertaining and informational content! Keep up the amazing work!
What sold me most was the clarity of the dust. Now I need this camera.
The camera is dumb af
one day the cameras will have better quality than our eyes
They already do.
@@micahroberts4481 i mean the megapixels of our eyes is 576 Megapixels
@@BashShell
Only after you've reconstructed all your fov by looking at everything ?
Jesus this is the first photography video in a long time I’ve enjoyed
0.02% you mean? 🌚
Yes
I'm equally amazed by the quality of the lense that allows to utilize this crazy resolution
I think a real world application would this would be to try and capture the beauty of old paintings etc. Being able to capture and reserve this much detail in a digital file is amazing. Normal everyday shooting, not really but that's not the purpose of this. Really cool to see.
Superman: I see your sensor moving.
Photographer: what??
Man, I would love to see this with a macro lens!
Crazy! Very good an informative Video :)
I set my phone from 144p to 1080p just to watch this video lol. Fantastic work 👏
Thank you Mr Fruity-Voice, that was amazing; seriously. Fanks🐶
Watching these videos on big ipad screen is wonderful
This is essentially what we use in astronomy, a process made by the HST team to process undersampled data.
The amount of details you can get on the pod is crazy.
also the optics you have on it is amazing
can somebody please tell me if this would be useful to digitize kodachrome slides ?
The HomePod was so satisfying
Best way to find the pieces of Dust
Outstanding presentation 👍😎♥️
hav you tried digitizing negatives with that? I think itll be so interesting to see the individual grains
love that apple pod shot, great video
definitely gotta try a macro lens on this body!
Can you use same algorithm on any camera with stabilization?
If we slap on a macro lens and pixel shift that baby we can watch horton hears a who in real time
Alr no one is talking about how fcking smooth that sponsor was?
This camera is insane! The human eye can only see up to 500mp.
Do you use a separate digital view finder with this camera? If so which ??
To me it's mind bogling how fuji avoids a full frame sensor but then makes this
IMHO because people would stop buying their APSC cameras and lenses. The whole line up would lose value.
@@kikodotfilip that's likely it :( I hope to see a fullframe fuji in future
@@INSTINCT777 For what? There are way too many full frame camera makers on the market already. And the gain of FF is just not worth it, imo. Atleast not in the mirrorless line. Lenses get a lot bigger, heavier and more expensive on FF, which kinda neglects the whole idea of mirrorless in the first place. Just my 2cents tho.
this camera combined with a macro lens lets you see germs
Wow epic camera ,cepic video budy !
I would use it for astrophotography , moonphotography .
Althought the earth moves to...hmm ?
Grtz
The movement might already be too much. Even 100mp are already pretty damn sensible.
Wasn´t there a hardware solution which compensates earth rotation?
Question: can you compare this against the IQ4 150MP OR 100MP
CAn you use a macro lens and see if you can see cells and bacteria on stuff?
I remember olympus e5m2 shocked me with its pixel shift resolution, but this 10 times that :D
Interesting video, thanks buddy.
Why not this function not available on Fuji apsc ?
me watching high resolution pictures in 480p.
How does the screen or printer display images with data smaller than a pixel?
Do all those pixels result in higher noise levels at full resolution?
Amazing! you can see the dust mites and pubes on everything
Amazing! I would love to see a macro shot with this
incredible
This is mental 🔥
My laptop would fly off to the Moon if it tried to process those files. 😭
What a bonkers camera. Nice video.
Joutch, that is amazing :P
So does it mean this is not for long exposures of astrophoto?
This Camera with a Macro lens would be a God send for Motherboards scans and close ups of Electronics internals.
Mobile smartphone Camera market in 2 years= 500MP sensor
When you zoomed in on the homepod 😲
I wonder if a star tracked Astro shot would be still enough
Bits of dust chilling :D
that's a tad outrageous, in the best way possible. oh lord. i want this thing, or the new one. BUT I need it to work flawlessly in video via Ninja V. Great video!
Watching this on 360p 🔥 so much details 😂
I'm surprised that Fuji and Sony actually state the full RGB resolution for this rather than greyscale like tye standard resolution. For example the Sony A7R4 takes 16x 61mp to use 976mp from the beyer sensor. Since it is combining each 4 images into a true 61mp RGB 4 times on a computer and then multiplying that by 4 it ends up as 244, in the same way this Fuji is doing 407mp. That's pretty impressive. Finding lenses to resolve that detail whilst requiring a completely still subject and an extremely sturdy tripod is the challenge tho.
Any professional models that can stay super still to be ‘digitised’?
since we cant see the pixels move with our eyes.. how about to take a pixel shift image of the sensor of another camera performing pixel shift .. them maybe we can tell the movement if you stitch it all together in a video with 500% zoom or something like that
Your English is fabulous!
Ok, simple question. what is diffraction limit on this optics ? megapixels are pointless unless it has other data than neighbor pixel
Would love to see an actual use case for this... product photos for a billboard campaign? Massive gallery style prints?
I would use it to "scan" film XD
People trying to see details of the dust when I shoot on my phone and still croping for IG and getting mad that I'm loosing quality . Incredable!!!! What a beast.
you know I was thinking about a something like pixel shifting in the past where the camera would focus higher then a sub pixel and then shift which is kinda what this camera does
I think I got the idea from CRT monitors since they are just one pixel wizzing around the screen to get an image
Can you do macro with this camera? Still object is okay, but if you can do it with some animal, it will be more statisfied
I really would like to see you use the pixel shift for making a HDRi for lighting 3D scenes.
Who is the camera for?
incredible for museums.
I downloaded a few images in 400mp resolution which were online in december and now yours. All of them have tiny, but noticable pixel artefacts in structures and contrast-lines. I wonder if this is noticeable if the resolution is downscaled and how much improvement in sharpness there still is because of the higher resolution of the, but the 400 mp file isn´t as clear as the 100mp resolution image and not quite usable in full resolution.
We have the fuji gfx 100 at work since last week but I didn´t have the time to test the pixelshift option myself.
I have the same issue with mine and I thought it was user error. To be fair I have to pixel peep at insane zoom levels to notice them, so unless you are goint to print a 10m print you might not notice it. I tried to combined two pixel shift images with one taken slightly offset and at an angle before averaging them in photoshop. It cleans it up but only works if you are photographing a perfectly flat subject. Otherwise you introduce perspective/parallax issues
man would love to see a landscape photo with this, too bad it can't really work with even the slightest move so shooting trees would be a problem :(
but if the OIS can move more than pixel shift needs, can't it technically have OIS with Pixel shift on?
I can only say wow.
Definitely suited to digital preservation or forensic detail.
I wonder with a macro lens, and shoot a CMOS sensor of another camera, is it possible to reveal the pixel of that CMOS sensor?
Probably not really, you will hit the lens resolution limit and diffraction limit. I do macros and usually I push macro lenses over their limits by using macro rings. Beyond a point I don't get any more details.
A macro lens won't capture such detail, regardless of the shooting camera. That level of detail requires a microscope with lab-grade microscope objective lenses. As an engineer working in a nanotechnology company, I produced such micro images that revealed fairly distinct detail at about 1/3 micron (>350 nanometers), beyond which diffraction was a hard limit of visible light. For reference, a single pixel in a Canon EOS R5 is about 4 microns wide; so, a good microscope would achieve a slightly blurry, but legibly detailed image of a pixel.
What's the size of the images you took??
how would this thing perform in astrophotography?
what’s the connection between resolution and depth of field? is it that when zoomed in so far, anything not perfectly in focus will appear more blurred? if you zoomed 400MP the same amount as 100MP at 100%, DOF would appear the same yes?
yes. DOF blurring is the same. it is just that when resolution goes up you can see blurring initiating earlier, which was not visible in the lower resolution, since the pixel was bigger than the blur radius. In your example an 100% zoom 100mp will appear the same as 50% zoom 400mp (apart from sharpness, depending on antialiasing filter). Another problem with high resolution imaging is the dreaded COF, circle of confusion. again, not visible in lower resolution. Simple motion blur from tiny camera movement is resolution dependent, as well.
@@constantinosschinas4503 interesting.. thanks.
how long does a 16 shot sequence take? how many seconds? would be interesting to team up with someone who has a nice stable telescope to try some single shot (well 16 shot) astrophotography to see just what is possible with such a creature!
Sometimes higher resolution isn't the answer for everything. It's perfect for digitizing paintings but sometimes lower resolution but much higher image quality per pixel is much more important at getting an amazing image. That's basically how ari cinema cameras work. The old ones might not be able to shoot at 8K but the 1080p footage that comes out of these sensors is just amazing and very realistic.
I have done focus stacking on circuit board. When i wend home to edit them. I found dust. Oh crap. If i shoot this again I would defiantly bring can air with me next time.
OMG.Amazing.