ARTICLE 370 |J & K | Supreme Court Live I CJI Chandrachud I Adv Tushar Mehta | Day 12

►अपनी क़ानूनी समस्या को 1 कॉल पर अभी सॉल्व करे (Legal Opinion)
Whats App- wa.me/message/CNF4QLGUA6CNE1
Consult with Legal Shots Experts ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
Consult with Legal Expert Adv. Naman Mohnot ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/advoc...
______________________
►हमारे बनाये गए Legal Courses से जागरूक बने, Click here
learn.lpt.institute/courses/L...
_________________________
►Description
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was involved in a high-intensity argument in the Supreme Court today on the 12th day of hearings of petitions challenging the scrapping of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, the restoration of statehood and the holding of an Assembly election.
Mr Mehta, arguing for the government, had informed the court an election could be conducted - a key demand of critics of the centre's J&K policy - at any time and that the decision was in the hands of central and state poll bodies. On a timeline for statehood, Mr Mehta, however, said the government is "unable to give an exact time period for conversion".
The Solicitor General, in his opening remarks for the day, also read out government data to highlight the improved law-and-order situation in J&K and noted there were "52 organised bands in 2018 and now it is nil".
The Chief Justice played the role of peacemaker in this debate, saying, "Constitutional issue will be dealt only with the constitutional angle and not on the basis of the policy decisions."
Disclaimer:- This video has been made from the Live Hearing of the Supreme Court which is available on the Official TH-cam channel of the Supreme Court of India.
_________________________
► Related Videos
Future of Indian Judiciary- CJI Chandrachud Speech- • Future of Indian Judic...
How Much Junior Lawyers Should be Paid by Seniors: CJI Chandrachud- • How Much Junior Lawyer...
Practical Experience of CJI Chandrachud- • Practical Experience o...
J & K I ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court Live Hearing I Kapil Sibbal I CJI Chandrachud Bench I Day 2- • J & K I ARTICLE 370 I ...
ARTICLE 370 I Supreme Court Live Hearing I Kapil Sibbal I CJI Chandrachud Bench- • ARTICLE 370 I Supreme ...
_________________________
►Contact us
What's App ► [phone]
Reach out ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
_________________________
►Follow Us
Website ► thelegalshots.com/
Facebook ► / thelegalshots
Instagram ► / legal_shots
Linkedin ► / legalshots
_________________________
#legalshots #supremecourt #livehearing #article370 #jammukashmir #lawyer

[@josephsantoshkumar9427]

Respected CJI sir please look out Rajasthan same Manipur incidence take action sir

[@vivekpavale2836]

Eventhough state assembly was not their the representatives from the state are in the legislature assembly in the center as MP. Their concrance consultation and recommendation is for presidential order is assumed.

[@VermaRajinder]

Consultation, concurrance & Recommendations are not binding on the President of India !!! There is absolutely NO doubt that the President is the Supreme Sovereign Authority !!!

[@ChandrakantShinde-im2oe]

हिंदी में बोलो आम लोगों को इंग्लिश समझ में नहीं आती है देश के इतने बड़े सविधान पीठ पर बैठे हो और अंग्रेजी कार्य गुलामी

[@InfiniteCodeMage]

sudh hindi toh kisi ko samajh nahi aati.

[@aftabkhan-uu9jy]

Mr. Mehta is mainly referring the status of princely states which predominantly were under the provincial control of British rule with no independence of internal or external action to speak off. One surprises how a gorgious princely state like jk with all independent powers to conduct internal governance and full competence to conclude treaties and declare war against enemy states , is referred under same catagory of provisions /acts of national constitution. Framers of Indian constitution infact invented and incorporated article 370 to deal with the jk state's relations with union government within federal structure based on division of powers and as provided by accession document. Hence I suppose he is keeping cort before the horse and trying to wing the legal argument.

[@ramachandrannarayanan4029]

Sir,Govt side the explanation putforth by sh.Tushar Mehta SG and AG are worth appreciating .Hope,SC will deliver judgment in favour of Govt reg.Article 370,35A.