so just need to figure out how to create 10^72 entangled pairs and we got teleportation? Lets get on that ASAP! Our current travel tech is too primitive now. WE NEED FASTER,100%EFFICIENCY!
there are a few extra steps but if you'd like to ever work on it, I founded Unlimit3d Computing to work on solving cool QC problems like this. bless up.
To prove that quarks (subatomic particles) are more real while protons and neutrons (atomic particles) are less real, we need to establish a clear definition of what we mean by "real" and then provide evidence or logical arguments that support this claim. Let's approach this step by step. Definition of "real": For the purpose of this proof, we will define "real" as being more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality. Proof: 1. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of matter: - Protons and neutrons are composed of quarks. Protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark, while neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks. - Quarks are not known to have any substructure; they are considered to be elementary particles. - Therefore, quarks are more fundamental than protons and neutrons. 2. Quarks are indivisible: - Protons and neutrons can be divided into their constituent quarks through high-energy particle collisions. - However, there is no known way to divide quarks into smaller components. They are believed to be indivisible. - Therefore, quarks are indivisible, while protons and neutrons are divisible. 3. Quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality: - The Standard Model of particle physics, which is our most comprehensive theory of the fundamental particles and forces, describes quarks as elementary particles that interact through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces. - Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, are composite particles that emerge from the interactions of quarks. - Therefore, quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most fundamental scientific theories. 4. Quarks exhibit more fundamental properties: - Quarks have intrinsic properties such as color charge, flavor, and spin, which determine how they interact with each other and with other particles. - Protons and neutrons derive their properties from the collective behavior of their constituent quarks. - Therefore, the properties of quarks are more fundamental than those of protons and neutrons. 5. Quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons: - Without quarks, protons and neutrons would not exist, as they are composed entirely of quarks. - However, quarks can exist independently of protons and neutrons, as demonstrated by the existence of other hadrons such as mesons, which are composed of one quark and one antiquark. - Therefore, quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons, but not vice versa. Conclusion: Based on the above arguments, we can conclude that quarks are more real than protons and neutrons. Quarks are more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most advanced scientific theories. They exhibit intrinsic properties that determine the behavior of composite particles like protons and neutrons, and they are necessary for the existence of these atomic particles. It is important to note that this proof relies on our current scientific understanding of particle physics and the nature of matter. As our knowledge advances, our understanding of what is "real" may evolve. However, based on the current evidence and theories, the argument for the greater reality of quarks compared to protons and neutrons is strong.
GR is everything. How are w allowed a quantum spacetime with continuous flux AMF virtual particles but a simple continous dielectric ether is taboo? GR applied to a compressible dielectric super fluid will evolve all QFT from brownian motion. Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size. This is why there are limits. Limit theorem. This is why there is conservation. Closed in time. Neutron decay cosmology As inevitable as falling.
So, in QM, they say GR doesn't come out, correct? So what is missing? So what if it's the result. So say QM is galacty science and GR is planetary science. If this is the case then GR comes out of QM it just so far down the system it's hard to find. It doesn't come out until the observation is made? Can u think like this I wonder. Peace ✌️ 😎.
You have valid points professor , this dimension is an average dimension system, in the terms of energy build systems within it like waves of sand left on a beach when tide goes out but change again, as tide comes in and goes out again ,those waves of sand have changed ? ??, now transpose sand as an energy system which it is ??? Knowing how to use said energy for flight, is my arena
BH not only has many quantum state, but the whole universe has infinite dimensional, infinite state. But it isn't possible to arrive at the algorithm that permits coherent process leading to life and consciousness. It simply belong to divine design. First discovered by Sumerian king, who paid the price of Gilgamesh syndrome.
The edge of human conception with lots of if, maybe, and perhaps. As Einstein perhaps would put it, The plumber who dares to understand the mind of God, i.e., the Ultimate Reality.
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.213 | กรีน อัษฎาพร | 3 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3KrlLbCsadI/mqdefault.jpg)
so just need to figure out how to create 10^72 entangled pairs and we got teleportation? Lets get on that ASAP! Our current travel tech is too primitive now. WE NEED FASTER,100%EFFICIENCY!
there are a few extra steps but if you'd like to ever work on it, I founded Unlimit3d Computing to work on solving cool QC problems like this. bless up.
Susskind rules
To prove that quarks (subatomic particles) are more real while protons and neutrons (atomic particles) are less real, we need to establish a clear definition of what we mean by "real" and then provide evidence or logical arguments that support this claim. Let's approach this step by step.
Definition of "real":
For the purpose of this proof, we will define "real" as being more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality.
Proof:
1. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of matter:
- Protons and neutrons are composed of quarks. Protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark, while neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks.
- Quarks are not known to have any substructure; they are considered to be elementary particles.
- Therefore, quarks are more fundamental than protons and neutrons.
2. Quarks are indivisible:
- Protons and neutrons can be divided into their constituent quarks through high-energy particle collisions.
- However, there is no known way to divide quarks into smaller components. They are believed to be indivisible.
- Therefore, quarks are indivisible, while protons and neutrons are divisible.
3. Quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality:
- The Standard Model of particle physics, which is our most comprehensive theory of the fundamental particles and forces, describes quarks as elementary particles that interact through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces.
- Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, are composite particles that emerge from the interactions of quarks.
- Therefore, quarks are closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most fundamental scientific theories.
4. Quarks exhibit more fundamental properties:
- Quarks have intrinsic properties such as color charge, flavor, and spin, which determine how they interact with each other and with other particles.
- Protons and neutrons derive their properties from the collective behavior of their constituent quarks.
- Therefore, the properties of quarks are more fundamental than those of protons and neutrons.
5. Quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons:
- Without quarks, protons and neutrons would not exist, as they are composed entirely of quarks.
- However, quarks can exist independently of protons and neutrons, as demonstrated by the existence of other hadrons such as mesons, which are composed of one quark and one antiquark.
- Therefore, quarks are necessary for the existence of protons and neutrons, but not vice versa.
Conclusion:
Based on the above arguments, we can conclude that quarks are more real than protons and neutrons. Quarks are more fundamental, indivisible, and closer to the underlying nature of reality as described by our most advanced scientific theories. They exhibit intrinsic properties that determine the behavior of composite particles like protons and neutrons, and they are necessary for the existence of these atomic particles.
It is important to note that this proof relies on our current scientific understanding of particle physics and the nature of matter. As our knowledge advances, our understanding of what is "real" may evolve. However, based on the current evidence and theories, the argument for the greater reality of quarks compared to protons and neutrons is strong.
Easy Einstein
GR is everything.
How are w allowed a quantum spacetime with continuous flux AMF virtual particles but a simple continous dielectric ether is taboo?
GR applied to a compressible dielectric super fluid will evolve all QFT from brownian motion.
Time is a compactified dimension one single Planck second in size.
This is why there are limits.
Limit theorem.
This is why there is conservation.
Closed in time.
Neutron decay cosmology
As inevitable as falling.
So, in QM, they say GR doesn't come out, correct? So what is missing? So what if it's the result. So say QM is galacty science and GR is planetary science. If this is the case then GR comes out of QM it just so far down the system it's hard to find. It doesn't come out until the observation is made? Can u think like this I wonder. Peace ✌️ 😎.
You have valid points professor , this dimension is an average dimension system, in the terms of energy build systems within it like waves of sand left on a beach when tide goes out but change again, as tide comes in and goes out again ,those waves of sand have changed ? ??, now transpose sand as an energy system which it is ??? Knowing how to use said energy for flight, is my arena
GR and QM : one implies the other ....!
BH not only has many quantum state, but the whole universe has infinite dimensional, infinite state. But it isn't possible to arrive at the algorithm that permits coherent process leading to life and consciousness. It simply belong to divine design. First discovered by Sumerian king, who paid the price of Gilgamesh syndrome.
The edge of human conception with lots of if, maybe, and perhaps. As Einstein perhaps would put it, The plumber who dares to understand the mind of God, i.e., the Ultimate Reality.
Why are men around if everything is so homogeneous? What kind of odd fluctuation are humans?
So 'entanglement'....
(In our 5 sense based holographic perception of reality)....
Is Thought..