วีดีโอ

We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.

Not having the use of EVIDENCE in a PROSECUTION is ANATHEMA to everything JUDICIAL MEANS!

20:21 : What Einstein originally (before the EPR paper) called spooky action at a distance was the 0-time collapse of the wave function in the Kopenhagen interpretation of QM. Thus entanglement was already the second type of spooky interaction! That first one btw. is still unresolved today.

Thank you.

If? Dark matter is for morons.

it doesn't

Who misses Susskind. Yeap do

When it comes to a laser photographed hologram, isn't a 2D representation of another 2D surface? Because it doesn't record anything about the interior of the volume being laser photographed.

Gravitolectromagnetism is where it's at.

Quantum entanglement is caused by information that resides in the anti-universe copy of our spacetime which is adjacent to ours manifesting by its operators on our spacetime,and by the sum of its operators (multi universes) on our spacetime. In effect our mirror copy is acausal, (it cannot initiate an action seen here) but has memory of the choices made, and operator control over the ways in which particles and fields interact.

I noticed that in his case of quantum fluid mechanics, the viscosity zeta formula can be restated as 4pi k_o zeta / S >or = hbar. This now resembles the Heisenberg Uncertainty relation where, eg: momentum x distance >or= hbar. So, is this eq. now as fundamental as the latter Heisenberg relation?

Un-fucking-likely.

QM classicalized in 2010. Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck, Bohr etc. Further:” The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. So,no.

As well known in the field, Vera Rubin discovered the flat rotation curves of spiral galaxies using optical spectra, which could be a Noble prize worth discovery. However, very few people noticed that when Vera Rubin interpreted her observational results, she made a very simple mistake: She applied the spherical model to the spiral galaxies (see the paper published in Science by Vera Rubin: Science, New Series, Vol. 220, No. 4604 (Jun. 24, 1983), pp. 1339-1344. Pay attention to Equations (1)-(3) on page 1340 and the text above Equation (1)). Also, when you read the paper published by Fritz Zwicky in 1937 (THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, Vol. 86, No. 3, 217-246) carefully, you will notice that he also utilized a spherical model to estimate the mass of the Coma cluster. As every physicist should know, an object with a spherical mass produces a Keplerian rotational curve, but a disk-like mass distribution will not follow that. Therefore, the key issue is how the mass is distributed in a galaxy. Any galaxy with a spherical (or close to spherical) mass distribution will not need dark matter. The results of NGC1052-DF2 and DF4 are the examples. The flat rotation curves of spiral galaxies are caused by the disk shaped (non spherical) mass distributions. So, dark matter does not exist and it is just a consequence of misusing Newton’s law in gravitational systems with non-spherical mass distributions (for more details see www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S2424942417500049 ). With the latest GAIA data of the Milky Way Galaxy, it has been shown that by using a disk mass distribution model and by solving the Poisson equation, a flat rotation curve which reproduces the key observed features of the Galaxy has been obtained with no need for a dark halo (arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1612/1612.07781.pdf).

The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A 2 axis graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

I guess "quantized gravity "in the form of gravitons would contradict the principle of equivalence?

1. Quantum Coherence in Biological Systems: Prediction: Certain biological molecules maintain quantum coherence for significantly longer times than expected at room temperature due to their interaction with 0D-like information structures. Experiment: Use advanced spectroscopic techniques to measure quantum coherence times in specific proteins or DNA molecules. Compare these to theoretical predictions based on our 0D information theory. Impact: If confirmed, this could revolutionize our understanding of quantum effects in biology and provide evidence for 0D information structures influencing macroscopic systems. 2. Information-Based Quantum Gravity Effects: Prediction: Gravitational effects have a quantized structure at very small scales, with the quantization related to fundamental information units. Experiment: Design high-precision interferometry experiments to detect minute variations in gravitational fields that correspond to these proposed information quanta. Impact: This could provide the first experimental evidence linking quantum gravity to information theory, potentially bridging quantum mechanics and general relativity. 3. Entropy Gradient in Particle Physics: Prediction: Particles with higher rest mass exhibit slightly higher entropy than lighter particles, due to their greater dimensional "extension" from the 0D realm. Experiment: Conduct precise measurements of entropy-related properties (e.g., heat capacity) for different elementary particles and look for a correlation with mass. Impact: If observed, this could provide evidence for our dimensional entropy hypothesis and offer new insights into the nature of mass and its relation to information. 4. Quantum Measurement as Information Transition: Prediction: The collapse of the wave function during quantum measurement corresponds to a sudden increase in entropy as information transitions from a 0D-like state to a higher-dimensional representation. Experiment: Develop ultra-sensitive entropy detectors to measure entropy changes during quantum measurements, looking for a characteristic spike. Impact: This could provide a new understanding of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics and support our theory of dimensional information dynamics. 5. Information Vacuum Fluctuations: Prediction: The quantum vacuum exhibits fluctuations in its information content, distinct from energy fluctuations, which could be detected as noise in highly sensitive information processing systems. Experiment: Design and build quantum information processors that are sensitive to these proposed information fluctuations, and look for characteristic noise patterns. Impact: If detected, this would provide evidence for the fundamental nature of information in physical reality and support our 0D information theory. 6. Dimensional Phase Transitions in High-Energy Collisions: Prediction: In extremely high-energy particle collisions, brief transitions to lower-dimensional states (closer to 0D) occur, manifesting as anomalies in particle production or energy distributions. Experiment: Analyze data from high-energy particle colliders, looking for specific signatures that would indicate these dimensional transitions. Impact: This could provide evidence for the dynamic nature of dimensionality and its relation to energy and information content. 7. Quantum Entanglement as 0D Information Sharing: Prediction: The strength of quantum entanglement between particles is inversely related to their effective dimensionality, with maximally entangled states approaching 0D-like behavior. Experiment: Conduct precise measurements of entanglement strength for various quantum systems, correlating the results with other measures of the system's effective dimensionality. Impact: This could provide a new understanding of quantum entanglement and support our theory of 0D information structures underlying quantum phenomena. These predictions are designed to be testable with advanced but potentially achievable experimental setups. They also touch on fundamental aspects of physics, from quantum mechanics and gravity to the nature of information and dimensionality.

Me - “What was that about the relationship between gravity and quantum gravity/mechanics .. missed it.”

For er = epr, er Bridge needs to transfer information instantaneously. That violates travel faster than the speed of light. Unless the distance is zero

23:18 In fact, this is not a radical, but an archaic assumption. Einstein was not interested in gravity, his goal was to extend the principle of relativity to non-inertial reference frames as well. 0.In 1907 Einstein started with the classical equivalence principle (gravity/inertia), but soon modified it: gravity suddenly "became equivalent" to the curvature of 4-space, and was replaced by it. 1.For all physical fields, with the exception of the gravitational one, the source of the field does not depend on the quantities characterizing the field itself. This difference is due to the fact that the gravitational field obeys the principle of equivalence and therefore it can be geometrized. Other physical fields do not have this property. 2.However, real gravitational fields are variable in space and time, so there is no global equivalence between them and non-inertial reference frames. In the case of a gravitational field, no global transformation can exclude it and thereby bring the metric to the form of an inertial Cartesian system. This can be done only in an infinitesimal 4-volume in the vicinity of the event P. 3.That is, the strong equivalence principle (the same flow of natural phenomena in the gravitational field and the corresponding non-inertial systems) turns out to be just a dream; and the principle of general covariance, which holds for all 4-coordinate systems without exception, is unreasonable (in GR).* 4.Cosmetic additions by Kerr and others will not save GR from singularities while Einstein's theory of gravity is chartered in a Riemannian manifold. Of course, all physicists were aware of the difficulties of GR**, but the experimental data showed in favor of GR***. 5.Unfortunately, only at the end of his life (in the last published article, on the last page of the article) Einstein recognized that the geometrization of gravity is unjustified and prevents the creation of a unified theory: Einstein. Relativistic theory of the non-symmetric field (General Remarks, D). The Meaning of Relativity. Fifth edition. Princeton, 1955. 6.“One can give reasons why reality cannot at all be represented by a continuous field. From the quantum phenomena it appears to follow with certainty that a finite system of finite energy can be completely described by a finite set of numbers (quantum numbers). This does not seem to be in accordance with a continuum theory, and must lead to an attempt to find a purely algebraic theory for the description of reality. But nobody knows how to obtain in basis of such a theory.” ------------- *) - “The objective is to establish a theory based on the principle of equivalence for the case of inhomogeneous gravitational fields: already Einstein and Abraham tried to characterize the total static gravitational field by the value of the speed of light c at each point in space-time, which would thus play the role of the gravitational potential(✓), and they looked for differential equations that the speed c must satisfy. But even if we set aside the fact that these theories take into account only gravitational fields of a special kind, they had already led to difficulties.” (Pauli, RT). **) - "Thus, there are "true" gravitational fields; however, the meaning of this word in general relativity is different than in classical mechanics... The question of in which cases, by choosing a reference point, the gravitational field is destroyed throughout its entire length can, of course, be resolved only by a complete theory." (Born, Theory of Relativity, Chapter VII, paragraph 2). “The geometry of space in general relativity theory turned out to be another field, therefore the geometry of space in GR is almost the same as the gravitational field.” (Smolin). ***) - As a fundamental theory, GR has the ability with just one parameter: 0.r(G)/r=q to predict, explain new physical effects, and amend already known ones; 1.photon frequency shift in gravitational field Δw/w(0)=q; 2.the angle of deflection of a photon from a rectilinear propagation path =2q; 3.the Newtonian orbit of the planet shifts forward in its plane: during one revolution, a certain point of the orbit is shifted by an angle =3πq, for a circular orbit (eccentricity е=0); in the case of an elliptical orbit - for example, for perihelion displacement, the last expression must be divided by (1-e^2). 4.However, the parameter q is not necessarily a measure of the deviation of the metric from the pseudo-Euclidean one, since in the quantized phase space: “This new type of universe in its other properties resembles Einstein's cylindrical world." (A. Friedmann, "On the curvature of space", 1922). Developing Einstein's hypothesis of a cylindrical world, Einstein's theory of gravitation "migrates" into phase space: due to this, it is quantized. 5 Final formula:ф(G)=-[w/w(pl)]c^2/2, where ф(G) - is Newtonian gravitational potential(✓), w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational field. 6.q=πr/L[=w/w(pl)], where L is the length of the phase path, r - the corresponding orbital radius: and πr^2=r(G)L. 30:56 7.GR/QG predicts a new physical effect: w/w(pl)=q; expression for gravitational radiation from a test body, where w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravity/inertial field (space-time). 8.This is amenable to physical examination in laboratory conditions at present.

Needless to say I found none of this as explaining psi. Without a complete theory of QM (QC functions) none of these should make any sense.

Leonard Suskimd is a hero of mine. He's of the feynman design. I've seen this lecture already. Juan Maldecena did something very similar. All started with ER=EPR

Got to compliment you for that One. A great Gift for all my friends.. Thank you and take care 😊

Gravity is simply the result of MASS. Nano scale mass, is as close to being irrelevant as this conversation.

Let's explore these ideas: 1. Proving 0D is non-natural vs. 1D-4D being natural: While we can't definitively "prove" this in the strict mathematical sense, we can make a compelling argument: - Natural dimensions (1D-4D) are observable, measurable, and part of our everyday experience. - 0D, representing a dimensionless point, lacks spatial or temporal extension and thus exists outside our natural, observable universe. - In mathematics, natural numbers start from 1, while 0 is often treated separately, suggesting a fundamental difference. This distinction could align with the concept of 0D being more fundamental or "pre-geometric," existing prior to or outside of what we consider natural space-time. 2. Proving natural can't exist without the non-natural: Again, while a formal proof is challenging, we can construct a logical argument: - If 0D entities are truly fundamental and non-natural, and higher dimensions emerge from them, then by definition, the natural (1D-4D) requires the non-natural (0D) as its foundation. - This mirrors how in mathematics, complex structures are built upon more abstract, foundational concepts. - Quantum field theories often rely on abstract, non-observable entities (like virtual particles or fields) to explain observable phenomena. 3. Novel implications: If we accept these premises, several intriguing implications arise: a) Ontological Priority: The non-natural (0D) would have ontological priority over the natural, reversing traditional materialist philosophies. b) Information Fundamentalism: If 0D entities are fundamental, reality at its core might be informational rather than material. c) Emergent Naturalism: Our entire concept of "natural" laws and phenomena would be emergent properties of a more fundamental non-natural substrate. d) Limits of Science: Traditional scientific methods, designed to study the natural world, might be fundamentally limited in probing the true nature of reality. e) Bridging Physics and Metaphysics: This framework could provide a bridge between physical theories and metaphysical or even spiritual concepts that have traditionally been seen as separate from science. f) New Approach to Quantum Gravity: This perspective could offer a novel approach to quantum gravity, where gravity emerges from the interaction of 0D entities rather than being a fundamental force. g) Redefinition of Existence: We might need to redefine what we mean by "existence" if the most fundamental entities exist in a non-natural, 0D state. h) Computational Universe: If 0D entities are informational, it could lend credence to theories that our universe is fundamentally computational in nature. i) New Mathematical Frameworks: This could spur the development of new mathematical frameworks designed to model the emergence of natural dimensions from non-natural 0D foundations. These ideas, while highly speculative, open up exciting avenues for theoretical exploration and could potentially lead to revolutionary changes in our understanding of physics, philosophy, and the nature of reality itself.

The energy of a body in orbit is given by the sum of its kinetic and potential energy E=m(0)c^2/√(1-GM/Rc^2)-mc^2 - GMm/R for small values of R is E≈m(0)c^2/√(1-GM/c^2R), and if for allowed (possible) radii the relation R=(hn/2π)^2*1/GMm^2 holds, then E≈m(0)c^2/√(1-(GMm2π/hcn)^2). The kinetic energy grows indefinitely and this energy must be supplied to the system. The energy obtained from the intrinsic rest energy is E=m(0)c^2-m(0)c^2*√(1-GM/Rc^2)-GMm/R, where for small R the approximate relationship is E≈m(0)c^2-GMm/R, and if E=0, then c^2=GMm/m(0)R, where the square of c^4=(GMm)^2/m(0)R^2 after correcting for the force c^4/G=G(Mm)^2/(m(0)R)^2.

Attractive gravity is K > 0 in Einstein's Guv = KTuv this is ER nonsignaling = ER nontraversable , but K < 0 is EPR signaling = traversable ER wormhole

In the traversable wormhole the growth of complexity is stopped even reversed perhaps. The wormhole does not stretch faster than we can move from one mouth to the other.

UFOs show action-reaction EPR signaling = ER traversable wormholes stabilized by exotic negative active mass-energy moving forward in time.

I had a primitive version of ER = EPR in the 1975 pop-physics comic book Space-Time and Beyond (E.P. Dutton).

Unitarity = conservation of qusntum information is non-signaling EPR = non-traversable ER wormhole because of violation of action-reaction in the sense of Bohm's 1952 pilot wave picture. Restoring action-reaction violates unitarity i.e. signaling EPR = traversable wormhole.

Gravity is not a real force. It is a pseudo (inerital) force. The gravity field is the pattern of real force-free timelike geodesics in addition to the null geodesics. Curvature is the geodesic deviation.

Lenny is mistaken that ER = EPR is restricted to 10^-33 cm.

Man he never gets to the point

I'm no genius , but I'm trying hard.He introduces a new complex idea , then goes off on tangents , and by the time he returns to the initial point , I have a very hard time regaining the story.

Quantum gravity is easy: you replace the Minkoswki tensor in Dirac equation by the metric tensor. Then the electron 4-spinor become a source of the metric tensor in Einstein field equation. You have two coupled horrible equations but that is it, roughly you re done.

Travel into the past or even communicating with it would destabilize reality. If it is possible it must require energies that do not exist outside of a black hole's event horizon. Anything that happens inside a the event horizon can't effect the rest of the universe, so who knows?

Quantum Gravity is the literal embodiment of quantizing gravity. The quantization of gravity is the definition of Quantum Gravity. We don't mean anything else by it, especially NOT quantizing gravity. Sometimes people get lost in their academia.

14:35 When Landau's son grew up, he inadvertently remarked one day: "Dad, I've become taller than you." Landau replied calmly: "You've become longer than me." This family episode is very instructive in that a real physicist was not at a loss even in everyday life: he assessed the situation from his frame of reference ("you are longer than me"), then when his son chose someone else's (father's) frame of reference: "I am taller than you." P.S.So, what, where, when, from where, how much, how is “something” longer from something? The equations that formulate the laws of physics must be invariant with respect to any coordinate transformations. In a globally Lorentzian system (pseudo-Cartesian coordinates in inertial systems): du(k)/dт=0, dp(k)/dт=0, where u(k)=dx(k)/dт, p(k)=mu(k). Obviously, we have the same law in a locally Lorentzian system (tangent Minkowski space). Turning to the Riemannian space (to an arbitrary curved coordinate system): Du(k)/dт=0, Dp(k)/dт=0. So, it is possible to make a general statement that the free movement of the test body occurs along geodesic lines. This is the most general formulation of Newton's first law (Galileo's law). When there are other fields besides gravity, for example electromagnetic, the motion of a particle in Riemannian space-time does not occur according to geodesics: forces act on the particle that prevent free movement. Then in a locally Lorentzian system dp(k)/dт=F(k), where F is a four-dimensional force of non-gravitational, for example, quantum origin. P.P.S. In addition, it should be borne in mind that: 1.Newton's first law is not a special case of Newton's second law; 2.Only a homogeneous gravitational field can be eliminated by switching to a non-inertial frame of reference - a free-falling one; 3.Real gravitational fields are variable in space and time, so there is no global equivalence between them and non-inertial reference frames. 4. In 1 and 3, a.the principle of equivalence is not applicable; in 2, b. a little applicable.

Lecture does not need background valium music.

Love a Susskind lecture, what an incredible communicator he is.

Fascinating video!

You have it backwards. Quantum mechanics is a model of potential kinetic energy [potential for making a detection] (This type of energy grows with frequency), While Gravity is the potential energy storage wells (Energy Grows with angular motion polarization circumference or radius [hbar displacement]) Quantum gravity is many subquantum polarizations, when these polarizations touch, the potential is converted to kinetic energy. A quantum mechanic oscillation is the (kinetic drag transfer) between angular motion quanta (Potential energy storage with in polarization) where the potential is released as a excitation (oscillation that travels over hbar). Hbar is the radius of (h) circumference, which denotes the dominant average of potential energy storage in space (it is the boundary condition for mass growth, mass must grow by hbar momentum displacement). It emerges from the path of least resistance.

very nice, many thanks

i enjoyed this immensely.

Lenny… general relativity was not needed for navigation satellites: this is a persistent rumor. The original navigation satellites used a “correction table” that was empirically derived. The GR explanation was invented later, but was not required for the functionality of the satellites. [So, you got 2 out of 4.]

Lasers were invented without the use of QED. Einstein A & B coefficients for bosons apparently inspired the invention of lasers, along with the pre existing masers. [If memory serves, it was referred to as the search for optical masers.]

Thank you very much... This was as close to understanding as possible. There is still a missing part - how to set up experiment to measure the speed of the entanglement interaction (if that's the right word). But it's another story.

Thanks :::_-_-DEARALLY #U rock🟪💠

So, basically, ER bridges are thermodynamically impossible, as there will never be some Hawking radiation from BH A that forms BH B.