Where Do Electrons Get Their Everlasting Energy?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มี.ค. 2023
- We are all aware that moving requires the expenditure of energy. For example, if you want to start a car, you need to use gasoline.
It is common knowledge that energy cannot be created, as the first law of thermodynamics and the concept of perpetual motion show.
How, then, do electrons revolve around the nucleus all the time? Where do they get their energy from?
#explained #explainervideo #sciencefacts - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
“Definitely not an orbit”
*perpetually depicts orbit models*
I thought so too. I hate the particle model. Still, it is easier for people to visualize than the fluctuating foam of field excitation probabilities.
Funny thing about quantum mechanics is that it's similar to abstract art paintings. Everyone pretends to understand it...
One might ask: do we really understand anything of the sub-atomic world. Still the challenge was, is, to come up with a theory that explains what is observed and/or measured. The "Bohr theory" of the atom does explain some things but not all, so Quantum Mechanics was developed to answer some questions as posed in this video such as why the electron doesn't lose energy as it orbits around the nucleus, as in the Bohr model.
@@Hank520Tube how do we know that electron doesn't lose energy?
Particles do not exist. The Bohr model does not explain the orbit. Orbits are energy levels. They are waves. Everything is waves. The entire Universe is filled with waves.@@Hank520Tube
Electron doesn't lose its energy. Electron IS energy.@@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
I’m an artist working on a series of paintings about biochemistry and I love this analogy. I was thinking that all the proposed atomic models throughout the ages reminded me of the revolutions of seeing in art, ie linear perspective, Impressionism, cubism etc
In other words, they dont know.
A vave?
Maybe it’s like trying to explain something so fundamental, it’s a property. “Why’s water wet?” so to speak. It’s used to describe other things’ whys. Or something. Tf, I don’t know.
The title of this video is wrong , is not everlasting energy. Electron have energy when they move
From movement.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
@@ronjon7942what is “wet”. That’s just a human word to describe how something feels to our human senses. It’s deeper. I’m sure you know energy cannot be created or destroyed, so, an electron has to get its energy from something. Where does that something get its energy from since it can’t be created. Where does that something’s something get its energy from, etc. Will it lead to finite proof of god or will we just keep falling down an endless rabbit hole from one scientific discovery to the next? Who knows
Electron walks into a bar and starts critisizing everything: the bar is filthy....the beer is flat...the waitress is ugly.
Bartender says: Why are you so negative?
A bartender says: get out, we don't serve small particles in here.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
As the bartender, I would also ask "where did you get those legs?"
LOL 😂
between zero & infinity is where the energy comes from. between existence & non-existence
Spoiler alert: NO ANSWER GIVEN
I hate those spam videos
Electrons gain energy by absorbing photons, and lose energy by emitting photons.
It was explained near the end of the video.
Electrons get their energy from drinking RedBull, it gives them wings.
No No, the electrone looses Infinite Energy by math tricks done by physicists WHO have drunk to much Energy 😂
I think we know far, far more about outer space than we ever will understand about "inner space".
I think it was the Egyptians that believed that when you sleep at night you actually go into the underworld or the Land of the dead
@@SuperUAP what does it have to do with the subject?
Quantum theory has the most accurate mathematics to reality. While we don't fully understand dark matter and dark energy which makes up most of the universe.
Ever is a very long time.
Amazing that a few people figured this out over a hundred years ago. The rest of us today are left scratching our heads at an algebra problem.
Algebra? In high school and college, I’ve had a lot of calculus my career choices didn’t make me use. I can’t even add now without a calculator - although I was pretty good at math and physics, but pretty bad at arithmetic.
This video doesn’t answer the question it asks.
Also, what is a “vave”?
Because science won't accept that a creator commands particles behavior
@@MrBigdaddy2ya LOL!!! BS2ya!!
@@nixl3518 so when you see a car driving down the road do you say that car made itself. When you see a Farris wheel at a carnival do you say that Farris wheel spontaneously appear out of nothing. When you see the painting Mona Lisa do you say that happened naturally. No I think not, yet when you see a much more complex structure like a sun or a galaxy or a human body or a animal or a tree or a electron you say that amazing structure made itself without a command or blueprint. You should lol at you irrational beliefs and not my ration belief that everything with order and define form and function is likely a design by a higher intelligent being.
@@MrBigdaddy2ya so funny how your brain tricks you! I didn't write anything but "LOL" yet you were triggered enough to write all this BS! Quite entertaining!!
Anyway, your English is impressive but you missed a couple of spots. What are you trying to say, what is your philosophy? Are you saying that because somebody made the car then obviously "somebody" made the Universe?
Did you ever study Logic? There is a distinct difference in that we know who made the car, the Ferris wheel and even the "Mona Lisa"! Where exactly is the similar evidence for the Universe? Let me know what your evidence is.
Thank you for explaining from where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Based on the sofisticated explanation seems like actually nobody knows from where !
From the wear of other atoms! Wear is everywhere around you. That is why we are doing back-ups, because sometime the damage will happens. We know that from experience, but the process is a law of nature!
Thank you so much 😊
@@bigscientificquestions Can't really claim it is elementary man...
From movement.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements but serve perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement 9f electrons in us.
Very nice video and review. Reminded me of why I like physics & chemistry, had flashbacks to learning about orbitals & electron shells over 50 years ago. Should've mentioned electron state jumping from shell to shell though. And you really didn't explain where the energy comes from, which was the title that drew my attention.
No energy is required because there is no movement, electrons just happen to exist in a cloud of probabilities. Energy is exchanged when there is a change of the states. From there I understand the word quantum comes from, as those changes are discrete and measurable. I asked the AI of Google to watch the video and its answer was that the video at the end does not answer clearly the question, but finds my explanation good enough but it adds the following for clarity. 'The answer to the question "Where do electrons get their everlasting energy?" is that they don't require continuous energy because they aren't in a constant state of motion. Their energy is stored in their probabilistic distribution, and they only exchange energy when they transition between different states. This quantized energy exchange is what allows atoms to maintain their stable structure and form the building blocks of matter. The concept of electrons being in a cloud of probabilities, rather than a fixed orbit, is central to quantum mechanics. This means that electrons don't require continuous energy to maintain their position, as they aren't constantly moving around the nucleus. Instead, they exist in a superposition of states, where they have a possibility of being at any point within their orbital.
When an electron absorbs or emits energy, it transitions between these probabilistic states, causing a corresponding change in its energy level. This energy exchange is quantized, meaning it occurs in discrete steps rather than a continuous flow. This quantization is a key characteristic of quantum mechanics and is responsible for the stability of atoms. '
At their own tiny gas stations
I think Musk should send you to Mars, you could be very useful there.
@@egoideam Denial is a bitch, but you better realize this scammer game sooner than later, you can tank me, sooner or later, Elon SIMP :)
Which is photons. Just look up the photoelectric effect
Excellent.
That needs a positive 'ping'. A minute joke - with a large laugh.
Fare thee well.
I would have loved if they teached us the theory in this detail in our schools rather than just giving us formulas and doing random calculations for exams
You did not answer your own question, where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Supposedly all elementary particles get their mass from the Higgs field, maybe it provides energy also? Just asking!
The quantum field does all those things already. Higgs is a super dumb theory.
From movement.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements but serve perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement 9f electrons in us.
Nobody knows from where electrons get their energy. But the particle physicists definitely are clueless 😂😂😂
From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
Did not provide the answer for "WHERE..." electrons get their perpetual energy.
That doesn't matter, you watched the video to the end, so it got monetized.
Not perpetual energy, thats wrong, they get energy when they move
@@johnstephenalbert "Some Thing from Nothing never yet was born." Epicurus
It never stops moving when orbiting. It never stops spinning. It takes zero time to change orbitals. It never decays... pretty damn perpetual. @@sermodur
@@dieselscienceIs it his energy what causes that??
It appears that the thing that has saved Quantum Mechanics is its incredible prediction accuracy, which has been used in practical engineering. Its inability to “make sense” has been long forgiven and forgotten, except by die hard academics still searching for “meaning”.
Very astute.
There are about 30 different ways they could explain it with the same math but modern society has chosen the "the moon isn't there when you're not looking" version, because Clown World.
If she said how the energy doesn't deplete I completely missed it
She actually described how the original question is meaningless. It was click bait, and it worked.
Thank you for the effort of creating this video! You chose very beautiful images and was very careful to explain the electron properties. I believe you have a lot of potential for possible improvements in your future videos.
Firstly, I would dedicate more attention to a proper ending or conclusion to the videos. The ending here was pretty much abrupt. You do not necessarily have to follow the formula "subscribe, thanks for watching, etc", but you might think about the art of story telling. You are trying to tell a story, an arch which has an introduction, a question or problem being answered, and at the end a conclusion. Some other channels might give you good ideas on how to do so.
I think your English pronunciation is pretty good. I am also a non-native speaker, I am from Brazil. I would just work on the pronunciation of some words which begin with "w", which were being pronounced as if it was German, with a "v" sound... It took me some time to understand some words and that you were trying to make an analogy with falling into a "well".
Keep it up! I wish you all the best for your channel.
Wow! You, sir, are amazing! Not only was your critique on point and succinct, but it also demonstrated a level of empathy and grace I rarely find in contemporary life (let alone online). So for this, I now say Thank You! And to the creator of this piece, I also extend my Thanks and appreciation.
@@anotherclearchannel Hello there, thanks for the nice words! To be honest, not such a great deal. But I understand your point: it is like when someone is in the desert and water becomes precious, although it should be something normal, more present and abundant. Well, let us do our share, even if it is a tiny drop of water.
Nowadays it seems that people have two neurons (one for and the other one against). So either they love or they hate. But the world is much more complex than that. And we are always learning and improving.
Because you also noticed the talent of the girl you would have done the same. Treat her with the same respect you would have for a little sister for example.
Having said that, we should also recognize that not always will be possible to be kind in life. Truth is more important, truth is above kindness in a hierarchy of values.
Either because of our inherent flaws or because some situations might demand tools like irony, self defense, and even a little offence (as long as it is in the right measure)... not always sweet words will do the job. A person may have to listen to bitter words to wake up in a certain situation. That is a very difficult art, pretty difficult to find the right tone.
Anyways, thanks for the reply, I took the opportunity to practice my English a little bit! Kinda rusty, had to look up some words.
Your English is well above average even for English people.@@davi.poiani
Get a life
Everything has a vabration as long the temperature is over absolute zero... It might take up energy from the surroundings
Very descriptive....still haven't answered the question though. Why is there any energy at all?
The universe is a Pentium nature through mass and massless matter
I always wondered about that. Kept me up nights, it did.
Thanks for the video and all the data provided in it.
I have only one question: where do electrons get their everlasting energy?
well explained but billions of years old electrons how do they continue their energy state? ae we living inside a simulation andinorde for simulation to constantly continue it is then constantly energised?
which are the points that can explain that we live in simulation.....??
From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
@@i-m-alien no, explained it in my previous comment
@@i-m-alien From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.
@@Play4Vida ....tired of double explaining....
Hmmm. I'm still not getting this. Unless electrons are either static "somethings", or travel unimpeded in a straight line, it seems to me that they still have some sort of limitless energy. Somehow I'm still missing something in this explanation.
Read my explanation, because till now there isn't any explanation on this basic question. Only a quantum physicist fond of the quantum field theory could say that the supply is coming from the field. But this is without any proof, just an abstractive theory!
I'm no expert, but it sounds to me like electrons are just energt states of the nucleus and are bound to it by the charge... So it gets its energy from the nucleus, but decays by emitting it, thus when the nucleus loses energy, it decays, loses the electron, the electron is absorbed by another, gets charged, decays, energy shifts... It's just energy states of the nucleus...and it shares energy(electon) by decay and vica verca. So the outer shell energy wants to be in the nulceus, and to do so he needs to lose energy, but the atom wants to have all he's electrons, to become stable... So this video just blew my mind... And makes me question what the hell is this natural interface between the quantum world and our visual reality.... Like, it's all just energy but we se matter, but damn, makes me realize how much more there is to know and realize ans visualize.. We're lucky. Merry Christmas, to whom it may concern
@@dalenvermeulen2836 Merry Christmas! Your thought about the decay is excellent! Now think about that you see continuously in nature. The decay of some give life to others. Atoms aren't isolated, they are gathered in collections with other atoms of the same staff, even some of them are more radioactive of others. So, the produced by their decay, the energy needed to the others to exist. For that reason, if you left an isolated mass of a gathering of atoms in let say isolated environment as possible, then after time you will realize that the collection has lost an amount of its mass. Also, energy can't be only the source of the material. Because it is also a property of it. A property of something can't be responsible for its existence. So, the material is everything. It is mass, energy, field, charge, polarity, space, time it is everything. And material has its main function, which is the unstopped motion and change. Furthermore, every property of the material is a creation of its inner motion!
They gather energy from the decay of other atoms. This process we call it wear not with loss, but we have transformation and then a progress or change to something else. This process drives the transformation of life into death, which give birth and life to others! That is the cycle in nature! See the plants. They take the necessary from the soil and the animals take the necessary from the decay of the plants. Then the animals are dying and fertilized the soil! And so on!
@@dalenvermeulen2836 That is incorrect. If electrons are just the energy states of the nucleus, they would be a part of the nucleus, not in an electron cloud AROUND the nucleus which takes different forms due to the energy states of the electron.
Additionally, the nucleus can have different energy states to those of the electrons. These are called nuclear energy states.
I'm going to watch it again.
This sounds like every energy that the electron looses in the lowest energy level is directed directly back to itself. That could happen if space is bent inwards in all directions toward it. This is in a sense expected, as without the trick of renormalisation the electrin should have infnite energy and hence create a singularity. The question is: why would such a singularity/black hole only affect the electron and nothing else around it?
So the question still remains without the answer?
Could it be that, matter inside a black hole is turned into energy? An (almost) infinitely small energy field with (almost) infinite energy?
What exactly is " almost infinite " ?
Hooking up the power cables is a real bitch though.
@@billcook7483 well... There's a finite mass going into singularity. So the "size" of singularity (if that makes any sense) determine the level of the energy field.
@@billcook7483- Exactly the same as "not anywhere close to infinite." 😊
Yes it is called Hawking radiation. The matter inside the blackhole will continually emit hawking radiation and will eventually evaporate leaving no mass.
Very informative 😮!!
Thank you very much 😊
I heard some where that an electron can only be excited once. is it true ? If yes then plz tell me why, i couldn't find it on net
what would that even mean? rlectrons doesnt have identity.
From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.
@Sara
An electron gets neutralize when it touches a proton.
The nucleus has a positive proton and the electron is negative so when they touch it becomes neutral, it becomes a neutron in the nucleus.
They don't "stop existing" they are just dormant. It takes a chemical reaction to initiate the proton or electron again.
If the chemical components are spent or expired then you won't be able to activate the dormant protons or electrons.
Hope this helps.
Bottom line: we can observe how the world works but not explain the how or why?
From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research.
Thank you!
If only this video existed when I went to school - so good
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback 😊
You forgot to answer the question? There are some good pointers here from followers. The question about electrons is a good one. Try again.
We go in circle. The rules and principles were discovered to explain the behavior of the electron. And then we say the electrons must behave this way because of the rules we discovered.
This is not science.
Thanks a lot
You are welcome 😊
This was very enjoyable.
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea.
I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
Wow! I'm going to spend time reading this with full concentration. How / where did you come up with this?
@@davedsilva
I started out trying to understand "String Theory" but came to realize the number of spatial dimensions required to make it work seemed to make it unlikely. Then I started looking for a simpler idea that had only one extra spatial dimension.
These, my friend, are only abstractive without any proof theories. Read my explanation for the real answer!
@@user-dialectic-scietist1
Constructive criticism is a good thing. I did not see your explanation of the source of the "Quantum" in your answer. Did I miss something?
@@SpotterVideo The last theory of the quantum physics is about the quantum field. This field, for them, has miracle even god's possibilities to give to particles through the Higgs boson even masses. So, masses also can be transformed to energy and vise versa, and it is obvious that they believe that the energy for everything is coming from the quantum field. But this thesis forgets the fact that we are describing through field, a material property. With field, we are describing the possible space where a material's specific interaction, can take place. The property of something can't the same time to be and the creator of that! For the terms, for space, time, field, charge, spin, or what ever, when you forget the real meaning, and you create an abstractive thought about them, that doesn't mean that our thought exist. Only real things exist and not abstractive thought.
If we name a rule then we can pretend to understand it with no freaking idea what enforces that rule, or where that rule came from. We just say, "Because that's Bob's Rule!!".
I don't like physics questions answered with "because of x's rule." either. But, I'm sure the rule wouldn't be a rule without rigorous tests.
"Then from that gigantic form of Mahā-Viṣṇu, Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu expands and enters into every universe. From Him, Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Śiva expand. Viṣṇu as Kṣīrodakaśāyī enters into the hearts of all living entities, as well as into all material elements, including the atom. The Brahma-saṁhitā says, aṇḍāntara-stha-paramāṇu-cayāntara-stham: (BS 5.35) “The Lord is within this universe and also within every atom."
Krsna Book, 87
I think that covers it.
Oh first islam now hinduism. It's like every false religion out there is trying to fill the vacuum left behind by Christianity.
How spooky, I had just asked myself this question a couple of days ago and YT presents me this video.
PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS:
Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements:
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)
謝謝！
What I find absoloutely amazing, and to also add incomprehensible, is that it was 'discovered' (or determined?) that electrons spin - snd this was in c.1932!!
The nucleus imparts a wave function energy onto the electrons, giving them a probability cloud around the nucleus. In free space electrons lack this energy imparted from the nucleus and only has it's spin up or down energy and behaves as a point particle.
We can observe , measure and classify beyond that I don't think we know much .
Great.
Thank you so much 😊
The origin of matter and energy is unknown to a rigid physical scientific model. We are far too arrogant and blind to improve the prime analysis (Socrates) and the improved version of it, the scientific method (Francis Bacon). “Beyond the veil of time and matter does the truth lie in wait, but therein it will be far too late.”
You never answered the question from the title.
Electeons are my favorate particle.
Cumbersome explanation.
Physical reality looks and acts like a big perpetual motion machine. Every perpetual motion machine has a hidden supply of endless energy. You have not found the supply yet. You have found a way to swim around in the weirdness of science.
IF you can answer the title question correctly, you can go collect your Nobel prize.
From movement, friction.
the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon.
But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy.
Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components.
This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses.
It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move.
Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other..
The best conductor is copper or steel.
Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons.
The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.
Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us.
The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy.
Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet.
I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.
PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.
Is it really a cloud of probabilities or does it just behave like that from our observations?
Light supports most particle behaviour.
So where energy electrons get? The answer is that if electron and proton is a particles the electron try to satisfy positive charge of proton. The biggest force of attraction is in opposite site of electron positional. So electron like entropy goes where biggest attraction. So from here is coming Heisenberg principle, - we get probability of electron . The question is why electron not fall to proton to make neutron answer is how neutron star forming , - after big explosion where force of proton repel force was overcome
1...so from where the electron is getting kinetic energy...?
2...electron is orbiting and electron is orbiting and travelling ...so in both condition it will radiate energy....???
3...what is difference between radiation and emitting
From the universal energy locker under e for electron.
still doesn't answer the question, in the end it is just orbiting the nuclear perpetually from where its energy it get?
All physical systems seek to lose their energy as fast as their environment will allow. A cup of hot water will cool faster when placed in a cold room than if placed in a warm room. But when the temperatures are balanced, then no more cooling will occur and no more energy is lost. The electron does not have everlasting energy, it just exists in a environment that does not permit it to lose energy
It’s something we derive power from by movement. A negative charge attracts a positive charge, and so on. 💯🤟
Super cool, but what on earth is a valve in this context?
This was just an amazingly information-packed yet concise synopsis. I loved it!
I think electrons get there energy from the fact that they trade charges from each other. The duality of everything thing in the universe is crazy from the micro to the macro
I found myself thinking, "liken it to a vell?" and then "Liken this to a vave". I figured out from the accompanying video that she meant "well" and "wave"
I never did get the "well" or the point of the bucket of water.
I thought it was "vowel". Obviously they should have added actual closed captions. Well, I guess it wasn't obvious to them .. but it should have been.
😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅
Think about permanent magnets. Put 2 ring magnets on a shaft, same poles facing, and they will stay repelled for a very loooooong time.
Not quite a perpetual motion machine, but certainly a machine close to doing perpetual WORK (ie. lifting the weight of the magnet on top).
I suppose technically if the weight is not moving there is no work done.
W=FxD
@@drscott1 Does a spring do work? You could turn a pair of repelling magnets into a spring. ✌️
@@pj-vu3cn ya the definition of work can be a tricky one
I have a passing interest in advancements in science as it helps in my abstract and spiritual retrospections. The following musings are one such, I grant that I maybe entirely wrong.
“An orbit is a state of constant acceleration”, this is a bit misleading. What they mean is it is in a constant state of change of direction. Although it may maintain the same rotational velocity, because it isn’t moving in a linear way, it is accelerating rotationally.
it isnt misleading at all. change of direction is an acceleration.
@@matswessling6600They make it sound like the velocity increases .. and it doesn't.
@@THE-X-Force ? no, they dont.
@@matswessling6600Yes, they do ?
@@THE-X-Force when?
I was hoping you would explain if the electron violates the first law of thermodynamics. Is the electron in perpetual motion?
They got it wrong... (1st law of Thermodynamics) There are no closed systems in Nature, energy moves thru all systems just like it does in nature... Consciousness (Observation) determines what we see, in our given dimension such as a Frequency (Wave) or Mass (Particle)... Our senses just cannot see waves because they are not mass which is required in a 3 dimensional world... They really need to disclose the Unacknowledged Secret Access Programs!!!
As I understand it then there are no losses so it is more like the current in a super conductive ring. The energy stays there until it is taken out again but for an electron to exist it has a minimum energy. The electrons stay in their position because to push it into the kernel and combine with a proton and make a neutron need more energy then it has. If it get's smaller amounts of energy added it will just move outwards and eventually leave the atom.
Perpetual motion is not disallowed if no energy is taken out. You can just not make or brake energy.
on the contrary: the electron in the atom doesnt move.
@@matswessling6600That is too bad for you. Nothing will work for you if they don't for you.
@@leonhardtkristensen4093 what? what was that supposed to mean? in the atom electrons are at rest.
What's a vave?
Good point but how does electrons in an electric circuit work?
Great Vid but bottom line is (same as Philosophy) "It is stranger than we can think" RBS Haldane.
"IF" my current theory of everything is correct, currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test, but 'if' true, then the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up space and time itself as well as everything else in existence.
TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe.
The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other.
THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.)
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
So when an electron falls below the lowest possible energy state is falls into the nucleus and interacts with a proton to create a neutron?
nice video .. no information
Now I understand, positive repels negative because of Pauli and there are neutron stars and black holes.
So are we supposed to tell YOU where electrons get their energy - because that question was not answered in the video.
What does: _"Fall into the vowel"_ mean?
Is it possible that after a collapse to a black hole there's something else that prevents gravity from an infinite collapse? Another "quantum barrier"?
what is be elektron Vowel. ¿¿¿¿¿
You explain that so clearly. You are a very special teacher. I can see there is much to the method of your presentation,
and your presentation makes this subject much easier to understand for those who aren’t PhD majors.
Thank you so much 😊
Memories of Fermi-Dirac statistics in Quantum Statistical Mechanics....
Those vave functions
You still didn’t answer the question stated in the title of this video.
1:43 - They are not orbits; they are orbitals. This distinction is important.
Awesome explaining. Very well done. Thanks !!
Thank you so much 😊
I need more detail level than this..
Most likely it is saying works because of Xxx(random blackbox words)
But I really want to break that box for the real picture. I never seen a fully explaining video or text how exactly electrons orbit(or form a cloud) nucleus. Like, electrons interacts with electromagnetic force with the nuclei, that means in perspective of an electron, nuclei is attractive point, why it doesn’t fall then? Noone explains.
Infinity = video explaining this video, then a video to explain the explaination, then a video to explain that explaination video etc. . . .
I guess we don't really know. But, we have learned how to make use of those ting charged little darlings, and we are thankful for that.
We may never "know" what the universe is about because we are just beginning to understand, model, the physiscal world we perceive, as we percieve it.
What is a vell? What is a vave?
so if electrons arent made out of anything smaller (possibly out of those energy waves) does that mean that every single electron in the entire universe has the same mass?
Yes that is correct, There are only 2 fundamental particles, electrons and quarks and their antimatter counterparts, positrons and antiquarks. All fundamental particles have the same mass. A photon is actually a packet of energy that has no mass but lots of momentum.
Electron: Dude, check those bodatious vaves.
From 220 v you get it and 340 v
Temperature?
This is one interpretation of it
Sounds like perpetual motion?Since all particles gained their energy from the start( big bang?)and still have the same energy,it seems.
confused,,, some sites say the electrons are a long way from the nucleus ,This shows them very close in proportion of their size of corse ,,
“If u want to understand the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy frequency and vibration.” Nikola Tesla