Dear sir, thanks for your explanation. I am looking for miniature photography especially for coins... Please advise me which camera suitable for me... Thanks regards
I have been a Nikon DSLR guy for several years. Lately, I have been very interested in acquiring a mirrorless camera and I am clearly leaning towered a Sony (never had a Sony Camera before). The advanced auto focus advantages you find in the mirrorless cameras is a plus. I have been using Nikon D800 over last several years and was thinking to upgrade to Nikon D850. But I’m worried about battery life and over heating of these new mirrorless cameras. I’m a hobbyist of photography and am not a professional photographer and only shoot stills, this would be a first time to go with mirrorless cameras. I’m not interested in video at this time.
Thanks for the video, it's really well made and the model is beautifull. Funny that by guessing I always liked most the dslr images, somehow the less computerised focus looks more real. BTW I tried to change my dslr for a mirrorless, and I discovered that right now is not the right moment, the main problems noone ever points out, are: 1-the (best) electronical viewfinder works only with good to low light, at night you just see noise, that is a great problem if you want to shot stars or the milky way or really dark places. Plus if you don't have a good viewfinder you have issues also in lowlight (the delay issue is a common argument that comes on top of it). 2- all the mirrorless that have a good viewfinder (like the lumix) are as big and as heavy as the dslr. 3- the good lenses are heavy, so if you put on a "light" mirrorless a 2kg lens you have not solved the weight issue. everithing comes at an way higher price than a similar dslr for have "almost" the same image quality and a bounch of limitations more. My question was, is it worth the 30% higher price for doing the same stuff in fancier way? The marketing says yes. I will wait 10 more years.
I like to photograph landscapes and cityscapes and use a Nikon D800 and Canon 5Ds, I'd love to get an R5 but the price is prohibitive and I'm not sure I could do better landscapes with it so I'll stick my my old dSLR's and lenses and focus on getting better without buying a new camera and lenses and other gear! BTW, this is an awesome video with great example of both for people who have an interest in portrait photography!
I have no problems with DSLR cameras, if you have them, learn to use them better. These are cameras that have proven their great advantages for many years.
If the megapixel count was going to be an important issue then surely the Sony should have been tested against the Canon 5DSr or Nikon D850. Also if the comparison is aimed at novices then yes the mirrorless is going to easier to learn, but an experienced DSLR shooter will do just fine. I massively prefer a traditional an optical viewfinder over an EVF, so I'd plump for the D850 as it more modern and versatile than the 5DSr.
same here, I have a d750 and to be honest Nikon gives the best value overall, Nikon lenses are way more affordable and abundant on the used market.. d850 will be my next camera also...I have a buddy that has a Sony a7iii and he can barely find a deal on used lenses and I find all kind of deals for my Nikon, I just bought a mint condition sigma 35mm 1.4 for $400 bucks
I didn't try to guess which image was from which camera at first, I just picked the image I found more pleasing. It was the DSLR, and it was the DSLR in every photo going forward. In the jpeg in the red dress, I found the contrast of the Canon to be much better. I'm watching on a calibrated retina display, and there is something I just don't like about the Sony that I can't quite quantify. As far as the viewfinder goes, I really prefer to shoot through an optical view finder. I am in my 40's, so it's what I'm used to and I have to admit bias can play into it. I just hope that DSLR sticks around. Also, I love a big camera. I find my DSLR too small without a batter grip because I have large hands. The size and the weight are a plus for me personally.
But the smaller size and weight isn't always a good thing. When shooting long sessions mainly with heavier lenses you need to get a good hold of your camera. With A7III that's impossible for me without a grip and even with a grip the buttons and dials are cramped in to a too small space. And Sony lenses are as heavy or even heavier than the Canon /Tamron i use so no help there.
The Canon didn’t slightly misfocus, the photographer did. That part really screws up the comparison. If you are shooting single focus point in a portrait session how the hell can you miss the eye if your square is in the eye and if the model stops to pose for you? Yeah eye AF is great and it’s a luxury to have but totally not necessary to get proper eye focus on a subject. It’s a feature.
Somehow I like the colors of DSLR better in these photos. I don't know whether it is because of Canon vs. Sony or DSLR vs. Mirrorless. It would have been better if both cameras were from the same company preferably same lens too.
If you really want to compare about DSLR vs Mirrorless, I think u should compare from the same brand. Because lens coating & collour character would be different in canon and sony brand, it would affect the result significantly beside the system (DSLR/Mirrorless). CMIIW
Love your content btw...subscribed on the first day of watching your videos, i get so much to learn. Keep up the good work. I wanna witness your channel grow towards millions of subs 👍
Thanks! I have a good old EOS 6D and I do mainly portraits. Autofocus is a real frustration, even more when shooting indoors (I never use flash). I read that mirrorless perform much better on that level so I guess my next acquisition will be a Canon R6 mk2. Are the Sony cameras competitive with the R6 (price wise & performance wise)?
My eyes Are telling me DSLR looks better i dont know why people are pushing that Mirrorless / microfour thirds whatever they call it are better. DSLR Camera is honest it knows what an Ugly couple and Good looking couple Looks like Vs Mirrorless / Micro-four thirds Knows only Good looking couple and dennies ugly looking couple that it believes all Couple are good Looking ( An absolute Liar ) As simple as that 😂. Go Full frame guys.
I could spotted every canon 5dmkiv picture but this should have been compared to the r5 and not sony . As for me i will never buy a sony. Bro and if u use a canon 1dx mkiii you wouldn't be complaining about auto focus. And the 5dmkiv came out way back in 2016 that is half a decade old compare to the Sony. But great video just the wrong camera was use for the comparison. Before sony fanyboys talk nonsense i am a canon5dmk iv and a Panasonic Lumix sh1user for a while and many of gigs i carry my 5dmkiv for the job . Unless it is a video centric gig. I enjoyed the video nevertheless it just show all this mirrorless camera hyped isnt worth it because the final results is incremental judging on your final photos result.
You crop into her face and then tell us the pixel count on the mirrorless is higher. Comparison over at that point. The best camera in the world is the one in my hand that gets me the shot. Glad you are happy with your Sony purchase.
Been subbed for quite a while now, question.. Do you use a pop filter? Love the content but the the lip smacking and inhaling triggers my misophonia XD keep up the good work
Let's have somebody here, in the most brief, succinct way possible, explain the differences between a mirror-less camera, and a regular DSLR camera. Narrow it down for us. Why does it matter? Why should we care? - And forget the nitty gritty details -
@@BachPhotography - Yes, yes of course. But does that mean it's like using an old rangefinder camera? Not looking thru the photographic lens, or what? As far as I can tell, the only advantage to mirror-less is the possibility of a few dozen+ photos per second, and maybe smaller camera bodies. My world has always been DSLR.
good video bro! what would you suggest for a cooking channel on youtube, to both film from close range and also make the thumbnails for the vids, thanks a lot!
I'm planning to get sony a7iii with tamron 28-75 f/2.8 because of versatility of the lens and I'm an intermediate/enthusiastic photographer. Can i get good portraits with this lens? Please suggest me some good primes. I have sony 85mm 1.8 in mind as it is a budget lens and I'm not a professional
I appreciate how you gave your preference but you pointed out the benefits of a Mirrorless for portraits with the Autofocus and light weight and then you mentioned how it all depends on the skill level of the photographer.
Hi Bach !But do mirrorless cameras have a shutter with blades, or is it electronic? The fact that the ring is endlessly rotatable and not visible like in DSLRs makes me doubt.
It is really a great content in all aspects! Thank you and model for time to make it! The only thing which makes no sense - comparing color reproduction between Canon and Sony, where one company is master of photography and another technology. Maybe now in 2024 their color science for newest cameras will get closer :) I am into moving from M43 to full frame and wondering if I should start with DSLR or mirrorless system - and Nikon or Canon. I am an amateur who is into classic photography and do not need existing and incoming features soon (but who knows the future?). It makes the process more joyful and sassy. The only thing is that prices of mirror kits are still high. That probably has own meaning. Do y'all have any thoughts or advices? 📸
I liked this video. But as a comparison for the 2 different camera's I don't think this was a good comparison. Not enough colors and different angles made it feel mostly inaccurate
Come on, let's be honest. Both are extremely good in the skillful hands of the photographer. Yes, there are various pros and cons that are irrelevant to a well-equipped and experienced photographer. Thanks to high technology, it is nice to enjoy any of them.
This test is nonsense. This comparison is irrelevant, as two different manufacturers are being compared with one another. Sony and Canon. It doesn't matter whether it is mirrorless or DSLR. The image is created on the sensor and it determines the image quality. In other words. A lot of shit packed in beautiful words.
Definitely what you see here is that despite the fact that the Sony has more sharpness, the skin tones are extraterrestrial. It seems like Sony doesn't quite know what to do with light skin tones. On the other hand, in Canon the skin and its different tones look more gradual and natural.
In my opinion with DSLR you know perfectly well the moment you shoot hence images of her emotion are better in mirror less it slips one milisecond to early or to late. Saying all this I am not an expert.
oh quit it!!! Sony all day long! Yeah skin tones out of the camera are not on par with Nikon or Canon but that's no longer an issue with running through post processing software. Not many people turn over pics straight from the camera to a client.
The micro-contrast and 3d-pop with better red tones make DSLR Canon a better photo-creating tool whereas the Sony wins the turtle Donatello prize of gadets
I only use an older Canon 600d and a Samsung NX11 which date back to 2013/14. I recognized early on the pros of mirrorless (because a lot of what you said). When it comes to upgrading eventually, I would avoid a DSLR like the plague. Not because of the picture quality...ease of use and the superior reliability of sharp focus. A raft of other good reasons to choose mirrorless but you covered a few good reasons👍
Thank you for watching, remember that the RAW files are linked in the description, along with my new photography course! USE CODE EARLYBIRD!
Thanks for access to the RAW files, really useful to be able to edit them!
Do u shoot awb with sony? I find sony colors harder to manipulate.
Dear sir, thanks for your explanation.
I am looking for miniature photography especially for coins...
Please advise me which camera suitable for me...
Thanks regards
I have been a Nikon DSLR guy for several years. Lately, I have been very interested in acquiring a mirrorless camera and I am clearly leaning towered a Sony (never had a Sony Camera before).
The advanced auto focus advantages you find in the mirrorless cameras is a plus.
I have been using Nikon D800 over last several years and was thinking to upgrade to Nikon D850.
But I’m worried about battery life and over heating of these new mirrorless cameras.
I’m a hobbyist of photography and am not a professional photographer and only shoot stills, this would be a first time to go with mirrorless cameras. I’m not interested in video at this time.
Please make the model wear some cloths first, please.
the DSLR pics just look better to me straight out of the camera.
Lol how? There is no matching mirrorless lens
Your model really knows her angles. Amazing content
Wdym
That comes from narcissism
and forgot about face expressions
The DSLR images look more authentic.
No. The difference is the lens.
Sorry butt, Whoever uses mirrorless cameras has no taste and just want ThE aUtO fOcUs well ok its focused but its BAD canon has way better colours
Thanks for the video, it's really well made and the model is beautifull.
Funny that by guessing I always liked most the dslr images, somehow the less computerised focus looks more real.
BTW I tried to change my dslr for a mirrorless, and I discovered that right now is not the right moment,
the main problems noone ever points out, are:
1-the (best) electronical viewfinder works only with good to low light, at night you just see noise, that is a great problem if you want to shot stars or the milky way or really dark places. Plus if you don't have a good viewfinder you have issues also in lowlight (the delay issue is a common argument that comes on top of it).
2- all the mirrorless that have a good viewfinder (like the lumix) are as big and as heavy as the dslr.
3- the good lenses are heavy, so if you put on a "light" mirrorless a 2kg lens you have not solved the weight issue.
everithing comes at an way higher price than a similar dslr for have "almost" the same image quality and a bounch of limitations more.
My question was, is it worth the 30% higher price for doing the same stuff in fancier way?
The marketing says yes.
I will wait 10 more years.
Hola ,
Te comento que yo también era la idea de no cambiar a sin espejo
Pero ya soy de la generación y no me arrepiento, te lo recomiendo ampliamente
I like to photograph landscapes and cityscapes and use a Nikon D800 and Canon 5Ds, I'd love to get an R5 but the price is prohibitive and I'm not sure I could do better landscapes with it so I'll stick my my old dSLR's and lenses and focus on getting better without buying a new camera and lenses and other gear! BTW, this is an awesome video with great example of both for people who have an interest in portrait photography!
Great vid. I likehow you did a voiceover whilst showing footage. Much more engaging .
I have no problems with DSLR cameras, if you have them, learn to use them better. These are cameras that have proven their great advantages for many years.
I have no money for buy any camera but still I am watching this video 😅
If the megapixel count was going to be an important issue then surely the Sony should have been tested against the Canon 5DSr or Nikon D850. Also if the comparison is aimed at novices then yes the mirrorless is going to easier to learn, but an experienced DSLR shooter will do just fine. I massively prefer a traditional an optical viewfinder over an EVF, so I'd plump for the D850 as it more modern and versatile than the 5DSr.
Canon colors are still better though when shooting jpeg
I liked the look of the DSLR images better. D850 will be my next camera.
same here, I have a d750 and to be honest Nikon gives the best value overall, Nikon lenses are way more affordable and abundant on the used market.. d850 will be my next camera also...I have a buddy that has a Sony a7iii and he can barely find a deal on used lenses and I find all kind of deals for my Nikon, I just bought a mint condition sigma 35mm 1.4 for $400 bucks
@@delanescott7872 I would get the D850 IF it can shoot 4K at 60fps for slow mo purposes. It’s only limited at 24-30fps if I remembered correctly.
Sony photos always look a little.....off. The colors are just not right.
I didn't try to guess which image was from which camera at first, I just picked the image I found more pleasing. It was the DSLR, and it was the DSLR in every photo going forward. In the jpeg in the red dress, I found the contrast of the Canon to be much better. I'm watching on a calibrated retina display, and there is something I just don't like about the Sony that I can't quite quantify. As far as the viewfinder goes, I really prefer to shoot through an optical view finder. I am in my 40's, so it's what I'm used to and I have to admit bias can play into it. I just hope that DSLR sticks around. Also, I love a big camera. I find my DSLR too small without a batter grip because I have large hands. The size and the weight are a plus for me personally.
I also noticed the same. It seems like the video is biased or sponsored by Sony
But the smaller size and weight isn't always a good thing. When shooting long sessions mainly with heavier lenses you need to get a good hold of your camera. With A7III that's impossible for me without a grip and even with a grip the buttons and dials are cramped in to a too small space. And Sony lenses are as heavy or even heavier than the Canon /Tamron i use so no help there.
I find that a battery grip on the A7 series helps a lot with stability, you might enjoy using one if you find the camera to be too cramped
The Canon didn’t slightly misfocus, the photographer did. That part really screws up the comparison. If you are shooting single focus point in a portrait session how the hell can you miss the eye if your square is in the eye and if the model stops to pose for you? Yeah eye AF is great and it’s a luxury to have but totally not necessary to get proper eye focus on a subject. It’s a feature.
accidents happen dude. chill.
@@cottonhxney nah you chill. Get your photo game up.
I agree with you! There should be no way he could miss an eye focus.
eye autofocus is starting to be overhyped, most people don't even need it for stills and portrait shooting.
@@delanescott7872 I agree
Somehow I like the colors of DSLR better in these photos. I don't know whether it is because of Canon vs. Sony or DSLR vs. Mirrorless. It would have been better if both cameras were from the same company preferably same lens too.
Canon has overall better colors than sony. You are right, he should have tested canon vs canon
Agreed the Canon's looked more warm toned to me. Especially when you see her in the red dress.
It matters A LOT on how the camera looks and feels. Mirrorless camers are like baby cameras almost like a bridge camera.
Neither looks bad. It's semantics. Shoot on what you like.
the colour in the sony shows more maroon than red
If you really want to compare about DSLR vs Mirrorless, I think u should compare from the same brand. Because lens coating & collour character would be different in canon and sony brand, it would affect the result significantly beside the system (DSLR/Mirrorless).
CMIIW
Love your content btw...subscribed on the first day of watching your videos, i get so much to learn. Keep up the good work. I wanna witness your channel grow towards millions of subs 👍
This was a super informative and helpful comparison video. Thanks so much for this one man
Cannon has best colour balance
For portraits either is just fine…best results will come down to the photographer not the camera 😯
💯
Woahhh- you come up with this yourself?! Never heard it before 😂😂 (j/k)
Most ppl don’t understand _this_
@@sethie_shots Going into a shop and buying a $5000 USD camera will NOT automatically turn you into a professional photographer.
true
Im sorry but the size of mirrorless cameras is one of the reasons why I don’t like them. Simply they are just too small.
I feel the same way
Both are having good camera's
The mouth noises! Lol
Canon color was much better.
I am wondering if you have a video on what photo gallery you use for bookings, contract and photo delivery to clients?
Hi
Taylor Kimberly Clark Edward Gonzalez Cynthia
If you zoom the picture, u can see the diffrent. For me Dslr can produce great detail picture.
Sorry I am here to watch the model only
Brown Michael Thompson Sharon Williams Cynthia
Thanks! I have a good old EOS 6D and I do mainly portraits. Autofocus is a real frustration, even more when shooting indoors (I never use flash). I read that mirrorless perform much better on that level so I guess my next acquisition will be a Canon R6 mk2. Are the Sony cameras competitive with the R6 (price wise & performance wise)?
You didn't cover commercial photography with strobes where DSLR excels over mirrorless.
Clark Thomas Perez William Rodriguez Shirley
My eyes Are telling me DSLR looks better i dont know why people are pushing that Mirrorless / microfour thirds whatever they call it are better. DSLR Camera is honest it knows what an Ugly couple and Good looking couple Looks like Vs Mirrorless / Micro-four thirds Knows only Good looking couple and dennies ugly looking couple that it believes all Couple are good Looking ( An absolute Liar ) As simple as that 😂. Go Full frame guys.
I could spotted every canon 5dmkiv picture but this should have been compared to the r5 and not sony . As for me i will never buy a sony. Bro and if u use a canon 1dx mkiii you wouldn't be complaining about auto focus. And the 5dmkiv came out way back in 2016 that is half a decade old compare to the Sony. But great video just the wrong camera was use for the comparison. Before sony fanyboys talk nonsense i am a canon5dmk iv and a Panasonic Lumix sh1user for a while and many of gigs i carry my 5dmkiv for the job . Unless it is a video centric gig. I enjoyed the video nevertheless it just show all this mirrorless camera hyped isnt worth it because the final results is incremental judging on your final photos result.
How about now?
Gonzalez Thomas Robinson Ruth Garcia Shirley
You crop into her face and then tell us the pixel count on the mirrorless is higher. Comparison over at that point. The best camera in the world is the one in my hand that gets me the shot. Glad you are happy with your Sony purchase.
Taylor Deborah Davis Thomas Smith Matthew
Brown Brenda Rodriguez William Walker Linda
Lewis Patricia Harris Kenneth Miller Anthony
The love the DSLR. Image looks much better to me.
Been subbed for quite a while now, question.. Do you use a pop filter? Love the content but the the lip smacking and inhaling triggers my misophonia XD
keep up the good work
I use Rode NT usb mic which has an inbuilt pop filter, but you’re right I should probably move a little further away from it when I talk 🤣
Young Brenda Lopez Frank Wilson Donna
Williams Karen Perez Frank Lewis George
This girl is on fire🥺
Canon and sony output are ultimate, aaawwwwww Nikon worst output, I hate that brand
Clark George Garcia Lisa Wilson Michelle
Come for the beautiful model, but stay for the great informative video. :)
It's not the camera...camera is just used to click a good focused picture with proper orientation.
. It's the editing that makes it so....great pic..
For a person who know to take photos Canon 5d is better.
Lee Helen Martin Deborah Martinez Jeffrey
Garbage comparison. Mark 5 is from 2016.
In your course does it tell me how to make sure all of my clients are as good looking as your models?
Because that would be awesome.
Lee Sharon Robinson Jason Perez Edward
Sorry i couldnt listen to anything.
i think im inlove lmao
Canon's look is so cinematic that sony's highly processed image
Johnson Cynthia Young Dorothy Johnson Cynthia
Always love sony mirrorless camera...
a single lens for portrait and landscape photography ,which lens is you prefer
Probably a 70-200 f2.8
Taylor Betty Hall Gary Wilson Nancy
Lee Robert Harris Gary Perez Brian
Let's have somebody here, in the most brief, succinct way possible, explain the differences between a mirror-less camera, and a regular DSLR camera.
Narrow it down for us. Why does it matter? Why should we care? - And forget the nitty gritty details -
The different is one has a mirror and one doesn’t
@@BachPhotography - Yes, yes of course. But does that mean it's like using an old rangefinder camera? Not looking thru the photographic lens, or what?
As far as I can tell, the only advantage to mirror-less is the possibility of a few dozen+ photos per second, and maybe smaller camera bodies. My world has always been DSLR.
Don't confusing people mirror vs mirror less camera both are same picture but manufacturer of camera entery into new business market segment
So which one DSLR or miroles?
The sony skin tones make people look sick or diseased 😩
good video bro! what would you suggest for a cooking channel on youtube, to both film from close range and also make the thumbnails for the vids,
thanks a lot!
Bruh, I came here for the cameras and ended up falling in love
I'm planning to get sony a7iii with tamron 28-75 f/2.8 because of versatility of the lens and I'm an intermediate/enthusiastic photographer. Can i get good portraits with this lens? Please suggest me some good primes. I have sony 85mm 1.8 in mind as it is a budget lens and I'm not a professional
Consider nikon z6 ii with adapter n then buy best nikon lens since you are not a professional it wrks fr u
@@capturemedia3092 okay I'll look into that. Thank you for your time.
@@kumarmitrabhanu the 55mm from what I've seen takes stunning portraits
I appreciate how you gave your preference but you pointed out the benefits of a Mirrorless for portraits with the Autofocus and light weight and then you mentioned how it all depends on the skill level of the photographer.
Hi Bach !But do mirrorless cameras have a shutter with blades, or is it electronic? The fact that the ring is endlessly rotatable and not visible like in DSLRs makes me doubt.
It is really a great content in all aspects! Thank you and model for time to make it! The only thing which makes no sense - comparing color reproduction between Canon and Sony, where one company is master of photography and another technology. Maybe now in 2024 their color science for newest cameras will get closer :) I am into moving from M43 to full frame and wondering if I should start with DSLR or mirrorless system - and Nikon or Canon. I am an amateur who is into classic photography and do not need existing and incoming features soon (but who knows the future?). It makes the process more joyful and sassy. The only thing is that prices of mirror kits are still high. That probably has own meaning. Do y'all have any thoughts or advices? 📸
Mirrorless looks like film....
But we have better battery life 💯
I liked this video. But as a comparison for the 2 different camera's I don't think this was a good comparison.
Not enough colors and different angles made it feel mostly inaccurate
Come on, let's be honest. Both are extremely good in the skillful hands of the photographer. Yes, there are various pros and cons that are irrelevant to a well-equipped and experienced photographer. Thanks to high technology, it is nice to enjoy any of them.
This test is nonsense. This comparison is irrelevant, as two different manufacturers are being compared with one another. Sony and Canon. It doesn't matter whether it is mirrorless or DSLR. The image is created on the sensor and it determines the image quality. In other words. A lot of shit packed in beautiful words.
Yep
LMAO🤣🤣
Thank you for the video.
EVF lag of mirrorless cameras is strong enough reason for me to never consider this for my wildlife photography purposes.
Super useful now I now my next purchase thank you
Definitely what you see here is that despite the fact that the Sony has more sharpness, the skin tones are extraterrestrial. It seems like Sony doesn't quite know what to do with light skin tones. On the other hand, in Canon the skin and its different tones look more gradual and natural.
the model i can give you 90, totally 99
In my opinion with DSLR you know perfectly well the moment you shoot hence images of her emotion are better in mirror less it slips one milisecond to early or to late. Saying all this I am not an expert.
It’s obvious in every picture which is the Canon, because the color is objectively better.
I understand it hurts).
sony colors for skin tones suck, even for A9 - not even good as entry-level Canon
Takes less than a single minute to create a preset to fix that. On the other hand good luck correcting for the non existant low light performance
oh quit it!!! Sony all day long! Yeah skin tones out of the camera are not on par with Nikon or Canon but that's no longer an issue with running through post processing software. Not many people turn over pics straight from the camera to a client.
Love this video👍 can you please tell me about if you using photoshop for these pictures?
The micro-contrast and 3d-pop with better red tones make DSLR Canon a better photo-creating tool whereas the Sony wins the turtle Donatello prize of gadets
Incorrect compression. Your camera is not focus is for all of the Canon shots. Way too soft focus for the level of that camera.
Am i the only one who thought that the DSLR was way better?
Thank you, this is very helpful.
she makes this video much easier to watch.
Well I think in this video the DSLR won. Great.
Wizzz...wuzzzz...and video just finished...
Let say you will start today to be a professional photographer, which camera will you use mirrorless or Dslr and why?
Mirrorless. Don't buy into a dying system, especially if you are a pro.
I only use an older Canon 600d and a Samsung NX11 which date back to 2013/14. I recognized early on the pros of mirrorless (because a lot of what you said). When it comes to upgrading eventually, I would avoid a DSLR like the plague. Not because of the picture quality...ease of use and the superior reliability of sharp focus. A raft of other good reasons to choose mirrorless but you covered a few good reasons👍
Glad you agree :)