Bruce Dr. Controlled Burn (Shelton, CT) 6/27/24

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
  • Bruce Dr. Controlled Burn (Shelton, CT) 6/27/24
    SHELTON, CT - On June 27, 2024, the CT State Bomb Squad, along with ATF, CT State Fire Marshal, Shelton Fire Marshal, and the Shelton Fire Department conducted a controlled burn of a home at 7 Bruce Drive. Officials deemed the leveling of the home by fire would be the safest way to mitigate the danger posed by many unburned and unstable fireworks that survived the fire that ran through this same home 5 days earlier on June 22, 2024 during a thunderstorm. Cause of that fire is still under investigation, but firefighters had to deal with massive amounts of fireworks exploding while battling the blaze. Neighbors were notified of the controlled burn event on the 27th and told to shelter in place or evacuate from the morning until about 4pm. The homes to either side of the house were protected by water streams and plywood. The safety checks started at around 7am and the home was lit off at about noon. The Shelton Police Department have mentioned that they expect to make an arrest in this case.
    TO SEE THE VIDEO OF THE ORIGINAL FIRE AT THIS LOCATION:
    [EARLY ARRIVAL] Bruce Dr. 2nd Alarm Fire (Shelton, CT) 6/22/24
    • [EARLY ARRIVAL] Bruce ...
    For the full gallery of still images from this incident,
    visit: www.fireground...
    For licensing of this video, contact km406@hotmail.com
    No use outside of sharing this TH-cam link, or embedding this linked video is permitted without permission.
    Follow my other social media here: linktr.ee/Fire...
    Filmed in 4K and rendered out to 1080p60 HD.
    MY GEAR:
    Camera
    Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Camera - amzn.to/3qqDKjo​​
    Canon Battery Grip - amzn.to/2XUPbUe​​
    Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - amzn.to/38VwciL​​
    Sandisk Extreme 64GB SD Card - amzn.to/2YEMWUk​​
    Hazard 4 Freelance Tactical Photo Sling Bag - amzn.to/2WxJyZu​​
    Edited in Adobe Premiere Pro CC - amzn.to/2YGfpJA​​
    Drone
    DJI Mavic 2 Pro - amzn.to/2JW0ZkY​​
    PolarPro Shutter Collection (ND4, ND8, ND16 Filters) - amzn.to/2uAV9uL​​
    SanDisk Extreme 64GB microSD - amzn.to/2JU5blo​​
    Red Rock Tactical Sling Pack - amzn.to/2U5ApdO​​
    PGYTECH Hard Shell Case for DJI Mavic 2 Pro - amzn.to/2HR2EXl​​
    (As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.)
    #FIREGROUNDIMAGES #KeithMuratori #firefighting #firefighters #fire #stockfootage #stockvideo #structurefire #buildingfire #housefire #SheltonFire #SheltonCT, ATF, CT State Bomb Squad, fireworks

ความคิดเห็น • 175

  • @johnn2557
    @johnn2557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    If I lived in the house next door I would be pissed off at Shelton FD! There had to be a better way of dealing with this situation!

    • @johnsmith-wd5sq
      @johnsmith-wd5sq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I came here looking for this comment!

    • @stevepotthast4911
      @stevepotthast4911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Read the comments people!!!

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Those fireworks are treated as IED's. There ISN'T a better way, they're unstable. Unless you want to volunteer to go clean out the next house full of unstable fireworks yourself....

    • @mikeymcmikeface5599
      @mikeymcmikeface5599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@stevepotthast4911they are by idiots

    • @erikturner8687
      @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ffjsbso would it be safe for the owners to go in and get their belongings? With live explosives still in there, probably not a good idea…

  • @ladeseddy5994
    @ladeseddy5994 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    You have to have some pretty understanding neighbors to let that house 'go up' again. Having your house doused with high pressure water. IDK.

  • @Justamedic77
    @Justamedic77 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Most idiotic thing ive ever heard of in almost 30 years in the fire service

    • @johngrigsby6048
      @johngrigsby6048 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Insurance company most likely decided the original fire destroyed the home, would cost too much to repair it

    • @dock_yard1149
      @dock_yard1149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If you mean storing fireworks inside your own home, I totally agree. I bet their homeowners insurance refuses to pay out on the loss due to this. All for blowing up fireworks on yet another 4th of July?? Dumb Dumb Dumb.

    • @johnclarke682
      @johnclarke682 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dock_yard1149unfortunately insurance companies cannot deny a claim based on stupidity. Standard homeowners policy covers fire, could only deny if it was intentionally set by the policy holder.

    • @shanestamball1886
      @shanestamball1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dock_yard1149clearly you don't know laws surrounding fireworks, and there storage laws. There is currently a large group of experts outside of that community who have launched a private investigation into this matter.

  • @grizzly5313
    @grizzly5313 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Both of those neighbors houses are going to be saturated with toxic smoke.

    • @robdog1245
      @robdog1245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The house on the left started to go around 4:30, you can see it start smoking. Hope they sue the FD, PD, city, and AFT and everyone else involved in this clown show for any damage caused by the hoses and/or improperly controlling their 'controlled' burn.

    • @jdraidz
      @jdraidz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robdog1245 looks to be mist.. from water... thats being sprayed from the hose thats behind that said house. if you look one minute before that youll see a hose line behind it before its been used yet. at 3:14 you can see them.

  • @yuvgotubekidding
    @yuvgotubekidding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I really don’t understand why this had to be done. Would not be happy if I was a neighbor.

    • @dock_yard1149
      @dock_yard1149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hundreds of pounds of unexploded fireworks left behind and UNSTABLE, following the original fire (accidental) which set off some of the FW cache. If I was an abutting neighbor, I'd be DAMN GLAD the authorities planned and executed a SAFE removal of this hazard from my property lines. Wouldn't you??

    • @yuvgotubekidding
      @yuvgotubekidding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@dock_yard1149 I would think the fireworks would be safe if thoroughly drenched with water.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@yuvgotubekidding That actually makes them UNSTABLE.

    • @yuvgotubekidding
      @yuvgotubekidding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ffjsb thanks for clearing that up. 👍

    • @Laura-r2b5b
      @Laura-r2b5b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No one could of forced the owners to get rid the fireworks??? I mean....I wish I could understand this concept of burning a beautiful house to the ground and possibly destroying the houses on either side???

  • @colt191169
    @colt191169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    So they are worried about the fireworks going off and damaging other properties? The best thing they could come up with is to light them on fire? Makes sense. No body ever thought to soak them in water and then just demo the house like normal?

    • @JimTomatore
      @JimTomatore 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Fireworks are explosives and explosives can still explode, even wet. The act of demolition can easily start a fire, even without fireworks present. The shear volume of fireworks present at this residential location posed an extreme hazard, not only to the people tasked with demolition, but also to the surrounding community. Safe demolition of the house *might* have been possible, but it would have been long and drawn out, leaving a large potential threat to the surrounding houses and any people who wander in.
      Maybe people think fireworks are nothing to worry about, and in small quantities with careful handling that's usually the case. But, when large quantities are present and strict precautions are not taken, they can be just as deadly as military grenades or mortars. A mass detonation of fireworks could send shrapnel flying in every direction, hurting or killing people, even in their homes or vehicles. That's exactly why those massive concrete blocks were placed there, as a shield against flying debris.

    • @chazman4461
      @chazman4461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@JimTomatore So creating a large fire was the answer? The agencies involved are dumb. The US has bomb squads for a reason. The stuff shoud have been removed. Burning a house does not stop mass detonation or explosions from fireworks.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chazman4461 Another person heard from that has NO CLUE as to what they're talking about...

    • @mikeymcmikeface5599
      @mikeymcmikeface5599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@ffjsbyeah, that's you

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikeymcmikeface5599 Son, go back to your video games. I've been in the fire service for over 40 years.

  • @elizabethbarrow2879
    @elizabethbarrow2879 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Would the neighbour have managed to get extra insurance to cover water damage from that much water sprayed on their house , i know it rains im not daft but not in that volume

  • @ajosephbaumhauer4071
    @ajosephbaumhauer4071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It seems like venting the roof before lighting it off would have made for a more efficient burn 🔥 and possibly cleaner

  • @DavidGlaum
    @DavidGlaum 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    That is by far the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen a fire department to. The people that came up with that idea and approved. It should be taken out of the office and sent to Siberia or something.

    • @kevinhazlett7303
      @kevinhazlett7303 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It was the ATF who ordered the house burned!

    • @alexpro8779
      @alexpro8779 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am a firefighter from Siberia. Please don't send it here! Haha.

    • @DavidGlaum
      @DavidGlaum 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kevinhazlett7303 if they
      If they said put gasoline on an oil fire, would you do it? It doesn’t make it right they’re dumb.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It seems dumb to you because you don't know a damn thing about explosives.

  • @hihfty
    @hihfty 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The cement block wall they built in front of the garage wouldn’t of also been great along the 2 and 4 exposures protecting both houses. Instead they water damaged the house and took a risk

  • @Brian-cr6rb
    @Brian-cr6rb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Who is paying for the flooded basement in the house next door? This seems to be a terrible idea from so many aspects of safety and property protection. Regardless of the agency that organized it. It's a great watch though.

  • @ClarkdeBear
    @ClarkdeBear 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Inexcusable! How do you not protect the exposures appropriately? The Bravo exposure most definitely has thermal exposure damage.

  • @Mira-cf9ek
    @Mira-cf9ek 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did the family manage to get their belongings out that survived or did they burn those with the house?

  • @glennremillard2794
    @glennremillard2794 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Beautiful home what a shame

  • @rjdee3305
    @rjdee3305 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Biggest financial mistake that can be made, looked like a nice home, they had a huge amount of money tied up in illegal fireworks, home ordered burned down, insurance probably not covering the owners stupidity, and most likely have a mortgage, and facing jail time, and big fines!

  • @MrCT69
    @MrCT69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Why not cut holes in the roof so the fire and heat could go straight up?

    • @hounddog946
      @hounddog946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They’re VFDs. Not the real thing.

    • @speedball10169
      @speedball10169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hounddog946 What?

  • @williamheber2118
    @williamheber2118 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They should have their heads examined?

  • @DavidAnderson-oc4eu
    @DavidAnderson-oc4eu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would be furious if I was their neighbor

  • @Wagonracer8
    @Wagonracer8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m curious as to how many fireworks were in the house was it hundreds or thousands of fireworks?

  • @confounded5694
    @confounded5694 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I would have liked a house like that. Such a waste!

    • @juancena930
      @juancena930 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You would have like a house that was completely destroyed by a fire?

    • @mikeymcmikeface5599
      @mikeymcmikeface5599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@juancena930aren't you smart one

  • @chazmcbride9513
    @chazmcbride9513 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This fire was put out quickly. The fire department had nothing to do with the controlled burn other than conducting it after the ATF and bomb squad ordered it because the garage was still full of professional grade fireworks that were unstable.

  • @erikturner8687
    @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hopefully, the insurance company paid for the control burn, and damage to the neighboring houses. Taxpayers shouldn’t have to foot the bill….

  • @gavinschwartz5677
    @gavinschwartz5677 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Clown show

  • @lathamarea1437
    @lathamarea1437 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I watched a controlled burn of a roach infested house..they trenched around the house added some accelerant, lit that then torched the house..Glad i wasnt their neighbor..

  • @colt191169
    @colt191169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hahahah what?

  • @b3j8
    @b3j8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They did that to my sister's former home after she sold it to a Company that wanted to enlarge their plant. Watching that was a unique experience!

  • @andreagarrison2109
    @andreagarrison2109 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great work, as always Keith! 😊

  • @joeflick
    @joeflick 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How did the original fire start?

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have not heard cause yet.

    • @matthewvitka4455
      @matthewvitka4455 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The house was hit by lighting. I'm a neighbor

    • @flaviuskern225
      @flaviuskern225 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dudes wife is beyond pissed…

    • @metronorthrailfan2244
      @metronorthrailfan2244 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@matthewvitka4455 so that means you were a witness?

    • @hello_its_me.
      @hello_its_me. หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@matthewvitka4455WOW, so there were not enough walls between the strike. Never store FWs in a garage.

  • @firestarter2991
    @firestarter2991 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is very interesting never imagined they get a call like this

  • @wirebeam
    @wirebeam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    dont fireworks become useless when you soak them with water? Why would they need to burn the house down?

  • @shanestamball1886
    @shanestamball1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    BATFE has standards in handling certain types of events similar to this. But by all public accounts on the board so far and what we've seen in the video. Some agency are currently getting deluged with calls and FOIA requests. Their's a large private group of experts in Fireworks and explosives. Who have started their own investigation into this matter. From the video of them burning down the home and their isn't any visible signs of 1.1G or 1.3G products detonating. Is a cause of alarm in this situation and how inexperienced fire and law enforcement agencies might want to conduct themselves in the future.

  • @Taconephotography
    @Taconephotography 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s like a fire buff second helping ! Great footage!

  • @hjorleifuringason2778
    @hjorleifuringason2778 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What on earth are they doing, is this a fire drill? And did the neighbours agree to this?

    • @jeffreymartin6369
      @jeffreymartin6369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes neighbors were evacuated the man had hoarded old volatile fireworks that were unstable and dangerous to unload from the house. You saw the previous fire, charges of some sort were filed and this controlled planned burn was done

  • @mackhopper
    @mackhopper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Oh, so let’s have a play day and inconvenience the neighbors and displace them from their homes, let THEM incur toxic smoke…and, make it difficult for them to get up and down their street to live their regular lives, just for our self indulgence.
    Controlled burns are suppose to be that - controlled and in a controlled environment, which this is NOT! How incredibly unprofessional and wreck-less of these thoughtless agencies. What a fiasco.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From someone who's NEVER fought a fire...

    • @robdog1245
      @robdog1245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Whenever AFT is involved, expect a clown show, that's what happens when you bring in the circus.

    • @417rogers
      @417rogers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ffjsb As a Fire Cheif I fully agree with @ffjsb there are other ways to train

    • @speedball10169
      @speedball10169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@417rogers This wasn't a training exercise based on the description

    • @erikturner8687
      @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ffjsbwhat does that have to do with it? Why control burn it? Who pays for the damage to the neighbors homes? Who pays for all the equipment and manpower? Serious question?

  • @R32R38
    @R32R38 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    To repeat my comment to the prior video, fireworks are stupid.

    • @stevepotthast4911
      @stevepotthast4911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Fireworks aren't stupid. People that use them dangerously and illegally are stupid.

    • @dock_yard1149
      @dock_yard1149 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree. Go to a fireworks show, let the pros set them off. Personal fireworks ... WHY???

  • @rkozaczka
    @rkozaczka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Were the dump tanks supplemental water or was the shuttle the primary source ?

  • @justie1220
    @justie1220 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I honestly can’t understand all the armchair firefighting in this comment section. You people were not there, have no idea of the planning that went into this, and quite frankly have NO business talking about it. Your assanine comments are why a lot of places don’t post their videos. Get out of the comment section and go do some real firefighting.

    • @yuvgotubekidding
      @yuvgotubekidding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh I didn’t know this channel was for professional firefighters only. So it’s not alright to get questions answered and learn? Ok.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yuvgotubekidding Asking questions isn't armchair firefighting.

    • @shanestamball1886
      @shanestamball1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂😂😂, theres already a private investigation launched into the handling of this situation. From outside of that community by real experts in fireworks and explosives. To the folks who made the call to burn the rest of this house down, i hope they followed their own ATFE guidelines and recorded everything in a investigation. Because my understanding of why they claimed to burn it down, makes absolutely zero sense. And by the final fire shows ZERO EVIDENCE of 1.1G or 1.3G products detonating. I know a lot of calls have already been made and FOIA paperwork is dumping into all involved.

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@shanestamball1886 UH, the ATF ARE REAL EXPERTS on fireworks... SMH. Don't want your house burnt down?? Don't fill it with illegal fireworks.

    • @erikturner8687
      @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe you should enlighten?

  • @nicholasbloch605
    @nicholasbloch605 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing video Keith!

  • @MargaretCampbell-wv7eg
    @MargaretCampbell-wv7eg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's so sad when someone loses their home thay worked so hard for 😢😢😢

    • @frmerrin2
      @frmerrin2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If the fireworks were the cause then they only have themselves to blame.

    • @matthewvitka4455
      @matthewvitka4455 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@frmerrin2lightning hit the House causing the fire

  • @markgrano8137
    @markgrano8137 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sounded like consumer grade fireworks, no mortars or anything like that. Why would they do something so stupid?

    • @davidhibbs6989
      @davidhibbs6989 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The house to the left had some of the vinyl siding melt slightly so they will have to pay a deductible to their insurance company because the fire company wanted to burn the house down 5 days after the fire was put out! Just needed tearing down.

  • @kelrealomorihaha
    @kelrealomorihaha 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I am a friend of a witness so maybe I can answer questions sorry if I cant

  • @ffjsb
    @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Handlines would've been better to protect the exposures, you just neet to keep them wet, not blast them with a master stream.

    • @mikeymcmikeface5599
      @mikeymcmikeface5599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, armchair fire chief. 🙄

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikeymcmikeface5599 Please let me know when you have 40+ years fighting fire, with NUMEROUS certifications, and a major in Fire Science. Other than video games and trolling, what are YOUR qualifications???

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikeymcmikeface5599 Son, let me know when you've got 40+ years on the job, NUMEROUS certifications, and a major in Fire Science.
      The only qualifications you have are playing video games and being a sorry troll.

  • @eftate
    @eftate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Gotta love comments from people who have no idea what went into the decision, which was made by experts from multiple agencies. A friend taught me the term, "keyboard warriors." Ha!

  • @johnsmith-wd5sq
    @johnsmith-wd5sq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Imagine if Greta Thunberg ever saw what they were doing! "How Dare you!"

  • @robsorensen111
    @robsorensen111 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    For whatever reason, the house was "excessively loaded" with fireworks. It's asking for trouble - like lighting candles all around your house with a dozen golden retrievers inside, and then walking away.
    Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
    .

    • @josephbennett3482
      @josephbennett3482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Connecticut had severe weather the days prior to this controlled burn and lightning most likely struck the house causing ignition of the large amounts of fireworks inside but in the initial fire call all of the fireworks didn't go off so they had a deadly situation on their hands because they had unburned fireworks in the structure that were ready to explode but haven't so they had to get rid of them by setting the house on fire again.

    • @Duffr1234
      @Duffr1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Any dumbass knows if you put water on fireworks they are safe to move

  • @ffjsb
    @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    0:42, it's absolutely stupid to be standing in front of burning fireworks without ALL your PPE on. And there's NO reason to be IN the garage with them on fire.

    • @jeffreymartin6369
      @jeffreymartin6369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They didn’t know until they began to go off and even then they had no idea the place was loaded with them

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeffreymartin6369 They clearly knew at 0:42, yet still made poor choices...

  • @markmullin4246
    @markmullin4246 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    And,ppl are complaining about all the crap,entering our atmosphere, this was the solution?!😢
    Stupidity.

  • @robert3169
    @robert3169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ich frag mich, wo hier die ganzen Klimakleber und Umweltschützer sind?
    Da wird überall auf der Welt ein großes Theater abgespielt, nur bei den Amis, ja juckt das keinen Schwanz.

    • @davidhibbs6989
      @davidhibbs6989 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We American people use the old motto for everything ( everything counts except us ) like we say about Wars; it's not about dying for your country it's about getting the other poor Bastard to Die for His 😂

  • @Burnedandbroken
    @Burnedandbroken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So wait, this wasn’t training? I don’t understand lol

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The details are in the description below the video.

    • @Burnedandbroken
      @Burnedandbroken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@FIREGROUNDIMAGES my bad

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Burnedandbroken Oh no problem at all!

  • @ludoviclebouhoulec2556
    @ludoviclebouhoulec2556 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😊

  • @twiggs24
    @twiggs24 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Did they allow the people there to get all their stuff out? If not that is insane.

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think they did.

    • @DIRTDUMMY1
      @DIRTDUMMY1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Holy hell, why wouldn't the belongings and anything salvageable bee allowed to be removed? The amount of comments thinking that belongings were not allowed to be removed is unreal.

    • @erikturner8687
      @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DIRTDUMMY1actually, I think asking the question is fair! If the logic is to control burn it because of dangerous explosives that haven’t been detonated, wouldn’t it then have been dangerous to enter the house to search and remove any belongings?

  • @lehneruwe5531
    @lehneruwe5531 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Feuerwehr zündet nach 5 Tagen das Haus wieder an und brennt es ab.

    • @davidhibbs6989
      @davidhibbs6989 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ain't that something 😂

  • @ky1e200
    @ky1e200 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Couldn't the digger pull it down?

    • @briannorton7523
      @briannorton7523 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      problem is when loading debris into truck, then dump site, a risk is run that the unlit fire works could cause a fire in dump truck, fire in dump site or blow up when handling debris. this is the best way to make sure all fireworks are unable to cause harm to any person or property

  • @CWM030
    @CWM030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WTF Seriously??? The house looked fixable.

    • @stevepotthast4911
      @stevepotthast4911 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Read the comments!!! The house was full of illegal fireworks.

  • @kevinhazlett7303
    @kevinhazlett7303 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome video Brother!

  • @joeschnell5695
    @joeschnell5695 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey how come I never see any fire incident videos from Bridgeport?

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have quite a few. Just a little farther of a drive for me.

    • @jimbobcramden
      @jimbobcramden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And honestly Bridgeport is a quiet city when it comes to fires

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jimbobcramdenNot exactly

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@jimbobcramden I do not. I work in Bridgeport, live in Shelton.

  • @thisissparta789789
    @thisissparta789789 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They let the family get all of their belongings that survived out before the controlled burn. The fireworks inside weren’t your regular ones you’d buy at a fireworks stand. They were commercial-grade ones hooked to a detonator board that was compromised.

    • @shanestamball1886
      @shanestamball1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All that stuff that was going during the initial fire were consumer based products 1.4. There is currently a private group of experts looking into this matter.and in the coming weeks and months there will be a extensive over view and break down video on this matter. Gonna be a lot of questions needing answer's

    • @mackhopper
      @mackhopper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What a laugh! That doesn’t mean that this detonator board is now a booby trapped, time bomb. Good grief. Just dismantle the detonator board…problem solved and all of this pointless drama avoided.

  • @johntravis5362
    @johntravis5362 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The moment they said a “ controlled burn,” I knew they were going to burn his house down. Sending a message to all home owners at the approach of the 4th.

  • @Laura-r2b5b
    @Laura-r2b5b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looked like a beautiful home. May I ask what was wrong with it 😢

    • @FIREGROUNDIMAGES
      @FIREGROUNDIMAGES  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Full article is in the description under the video.

    • @josephbennett3482
      @josephbennett3482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Massive amount of fireworks inside that ignited and set the house on fire just days prior during a severe storm.

    • @matthewvitka4455
      @matthewvitka4455 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lightning hit the house

  • @johncolasanto605
    @johncolasanto605 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    can see the TEARS in AOC;s eyes as the smoke rises..

    • @psdesert7907
      @psdesert7907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why the F does everything have to political. This homeowner put his neighbors lives and homes in great danger

    • @erikturner8687
      @erikturner8687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@psdesert7907I believe he was being sarcastic…

  • @tg5298
    @tg5298 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice deck gun. What the ????

  • @mrsknowitall80
    @mrsknowitall80 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A liberal made this decision.

  • @harborcbs
    @harborcbs หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably the dumbest thing I've ever seen. Really? Thats the best solution?

  • @paulthomsen3788
    @paulthomsen3788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Wtf?

  • @psdesert7907
    @psdesert7907 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder if his insurance will deny a claim

    • @shanestamball1886
      @shanestamball1886 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely they will, hopefully he didn't sign anything agreeing to allow this to happen. There's a community of fireworks n explosives experts who are currently looking into this matter. Someone is gonna look real stupid at their Depositions

  • @paulzeigler7616
    @paulzeigler7616 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is unquestionably the stupidest thing I've ever seen a fire department or community do. Just ridiculous. They treated this guys fireworks stash like it was so e sort of bomb device. This a a case of boys playing with their toys. All they needed to do was go in and soak and surround and then put the fireworks in steel drums and haul away. To torch what was left of this house like this to get rid of some basic Class C - consumer fireworks is absurd. If I was one of the adjacent property owners I would be pissed as hell and sue the city. The most hilarious thing about it all is that they didn't even succeed in burning up whatever fireworks were in the back corners of those two garage stalls ...because all the debris from the burning house above basically buried the remaining fireworks and kept the fire from reaching them. This is just so ridiculous.