ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Attorneys representing Disney say a man's lawsuit filed after his wife's death following an allergic reaction at the resort should be dismissed because of the "terms and conditions" he agreed to when signing up for the Disney+ app.
» Subscribe to NBC News: nbcnews.to/Subs...
» Watch more NBC video: bit.ly/MoreNBCNews
NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: apps.nbcnews.c...
Breaking News Alerts: link.nbcnews.c...
Visit NBCNews.Com: nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: nbcnews.to/Foll...
Follow NBC News on Instagram: nbcnews.to/Inst...
#Disney #Lawsuit #Death
Disney killed this woman and then said….wellllll you did sign up for a free trial though. Disgusting
Boycott Disney on everything. The people who are running Disney has ruined what Walt Disney had envisioned. They think they are above the law. They are Greedy Careless People.
Disney’s real face.
You seemed to have bought a Disney Blu Ray and pressed the Fast Play option, thereby relinquishing your right to sue us when we send a ICBM to your house
@@tdhtran Disney has ruined so many good things. They are really evil demons.
@@tdhtran Disney has ruined so many good things. They are really evil demons.
If buying isn't owning, then pirating isn't stealing...
Great point!
Sped people will continue to repeat this comment
@@lemonlime8949explain why 😮
I still use ThePirateBay. All Disney Plus series are available in 1080p and sometimes 4k!
@@phillipvelednitskiy6881 they don’t know what it means but think they change the world every time they say it
No court should side with Disney on these issues. Otherwise everyone is effed by the system.
i can't wait to see your reaction after disney wins it (as it obviously will)
😆🤡 i doubt they will. You can't have a blanket arbitration for everything. It only applies to the app usage. Not visiting their parks. Nice you're 🤡
@@ArizonaSquatch oh yeah, i clearly can see how a multi bilion company that can afford the best lawyers in the world losing a case about a crime they didn't commit against a normal dude that didn't even pick the right person to sue
@@kryychu10 found the disney employee
We have to see if the terms are legal though as there's always a catch.
Probably the most evil thing ive heard from "Disney"
Well, that and "We are remaking Snow White as live action."
And that’s a high bar for the groomers to climb
@@wildcaveman5310 oh don’t be ridiculous. Haven’t you been paying attention lately? The groomers hang out at church not Disneyland, just ask pastor David Lawrence Schneider.
Actually, the most evil thing I’ve heard of them doing is them being financially complicit in the genocide. This particular instance in the report just sounds typical of them to be honest. Especially when you consider how they treat their workers.
it’s not disneys restaurant it’s just on their property
I canceled Disney plus, Hulu, and ESPN plus after hearing this. I also cancelled an October trip of 4 nights at the Contemporary. This is a dirty lawyer type of trick. Let them lose customers if this is how they conduct business.
good, ill have a better time knowing idiots wont be there
He did a 1 month free trial years prior, he never continued paying for it. He canceled it.
The contract is life long, you will own nothing, and you will be happy
Book the monorail resort call the Grand Floridian. The contemporary resort is nice with thg he monorail going through it.
capitalism at it's finest.
Doesn’t matter. You already signed it by buying it in the first place. Canceling changes nothing.
this fine print BS should not be vaild and laws should be in place , these companys know what their doing
We can all admit this is dirty. Nobody signing up for streaming thinks they are giving up their rights to sue over injury or death
@@lamar310 i can't imagine a world where this isn't shut down now or in the supreme court. we can only hope i guess
There’s a South Park episode that taught me about reading the fine print
ofcourse they know what they are doing, that's why the fine print is there in the first place. and yeah they should totaly have to own up to responsibility for what happened..
They'll say "Read the fine print of the fine print of the fine print of the...well you get it.
Oh God, can you imagine if you're on a Disney cruise and the ship goes down, the company can claim..all the passengers were Disney plus subscribers, thats why the crew abandoned them.
😂
Nah bro and if the opposers win then they'll just claim that the ship was never theirs
"The ship was piloted by a 3rd party operator."
@@tytyguy1able yep. this here is our present and future
Actually I can imagine them doing this. If they win this case.
I feel like Disney will lose more money as a backlash to this then they would have lost in a lawsuit to compensate for the death. It's like spiteful at this point.
And then they'll lose the lawsuit, too
PRECISELY....YOU GET GREEDY, YOU GET CAUGHT. IT WILL BE THEIR KARMA🔮@@PyroGothNerd
Their stocks might dip by a good amount for a couple months but then after a big release of a movie they will probably sore back up
@@lissaslighthouse8475 😡💢💢SHUT UP!!! This ISN'T their karma! Disney has NOTHING to do with that poor woman's death! Her husband should sue the restaurant instead, NOT Disney! What happened was an accident! It WASN'T intentional! This is stupid!
@@PyroGothNerd 😡💢💢They WON'T lose the lawsuit, because it was a mistake! What happened was an accident! The restaurant that Disney DOESN'T own is responsible, NOT Disney itself! Her husband made a terrible mistake! He SHOULD have sued the restaurant instead of Disney! And yes, Disney should've been more sympathetic to his loss, but even so, you should stop jumping to false conclusions!
So Jacked up. The guy lost his wife and is only suing for $50k and Disney’s fighting him? You kidding me? They’re gonna loose a lot more then that in PR alone.
Nah, he will be suing for millions.
50k is just the threshold used to determine which court hears the case.
So, they need to declare up front whether they are seeking more or less than 50k.
If this DOES go to trial, I suspect they will be forced to pay in the hundreds of millions as punitive damages given how repugnant the average juror will find this.
How is Disney responsible for this woman's death?
@@brutishfossil5022 In truth I have no problem with Disney defending the case on the basis that they don't actually own the restaurant. However, to try to dodge it using a Disney+ subscription is pretty evil.
@@brutishfossil5022that’s what I want to know, I don’t understand the connection
@@brutishfossil5022my understanding is that the discovery of the fine print when you sign up for Disney+ is the core issue, not the accident itself. Apparently, the fine print prevents you from suing Disney and since they signed up for it several years ago it still holds today because it’s a life long contract (as my understanding goes).
Disney is gonna backtrack for sure, They wont want this negativity. a few million dollars for wrongful death is nothing in comparison to almost a billion dollars in negative publicity.
Watch next week Disney is gonna release a statement
"We at Disney, take the upmost responsibility for anything that happens on our resorts and plan on providing all necessary compensation for such a terrible tragedy."
We're not talking a few million after this PR disaster.
It will be 100 million plus.
The husband asked for $50,000
Not a few million, that makes this even worse imo
Well during the last strike Iger the CEO said "Lets starve them out of their homes" And wasnt fired, So have to assume they dont care about their image anymore.
@@greg6500Thank you. If they cared about image they would have never let this go public.
“Defending ourselves” you are straight up bullying them.
"Gator Bait 'em"
How is Disney responsible?
It's a restaurant that is not connected to Disney but is on Disney property?
Right? What absolute hypocrites to say that and this BS with the Disney Plus contract in the same breath
It's a restaurant called "Ragland Road" at Disney Springs, a shopping area with tons of third party retail and restaurant locations. The employees of these third-party vendors do not work for Disney. To be clear, I am not defending what Disney is pulling.
@@dukeofhoagies The problem is how disney responds. I mean seriously, maybe next time someone used to have a disney+ then cancel it but went to a disney ride and got killed. Disney then said he used to have a disney+ subscription so he can't sue. Amazing right.
@@likesonggame Yep.
I agree that the Disney response isn’t the best. However I don’t think they should be liable for something that happened at a location that they don’t own or operate.
Boycott Disney
How’s that worked out for you?
@@lemonlime8949that's not how it works, Disney won't go bankrupt if me or you don't give them any money, but you feel better knowing you're not helping them with their crazy ideas
@@ForeverMan "feel better knowing you're not helping them with their crazy ideas" why do you even care then?
@@kryychu10 what do you mean ? I don't get it
😡💢💢SHUT UP!!! DON'T BOYCOTT DISNEY! NEVER BOYCOTT DISNEY!!!
The lesson here is if you signed up for disney plus once in your life, you have to stay as far away from any disney products as possible to protect yourself. We have to come up with a list.
Never signed up, never will
Didn’t the Supreme Court say those agreements are basically meaningless in the judicial system
It's almost like Disney doesn't want anybody to use their services anymore
And people shouldn't. It's like falling in love with an abuser.
Sure buddy lol this and nothing stops them from making money. Idk why this company is so loved by people.
@Squishmallows24 it is not actually, they have lost massive profits in the past several years
@@Squishmallows24 you seen the 2024 profit they have been making?
@@jarrodskufcagaming5203 😡💢💢Oh, clam it! They have NOT lost massive profits in the past several years, and they're NOT gonna now!
My team and I are gonna change Disney for the better, and we're gonna help Disney's stock profits SKYROCKET!!! With our creative help, Disney will be gaining massive profits instead of losing them!
So shut your trap and watch us work our magic!
Dear Disney, newsflash! A Disney+ subscription does not shield you from the opinion of your customers.
This is such a bad call. It’s legally, strategically and politically asinine.
lol this won't hold up in any court. Gross negligence isn't shielded by any sort of agreed "terms and conditions".
That is not the issue. It is where the issue can be fought. A jury trial is more likely to side with the plaintiffs and gain more money than an Arbitrator. Also it cannot be appealed.
@CarlyCarly1636 NONE of this is just going to go to arbitration simply because he signed some random terms on Disney+. It will be treated as any other case. Disney is just trying to pull some weird stalling tactic
@@CarlyCarly1636if legal council is present on the day prenuptial agreement is signed on both parties behalf and those get tossed out of court all the time. Then you can bet this bs 1 month trial from years ago won't stand up in court as a reason to arbitrate because he agreed to the TOS of said free trial that he canceled when the free trial was over. These companies think they can basically say if you take this free trial we own you and there's nothing you can do period. I'd personally love to be there when the judge sees this in their court.
@@DraconasJust the fact THEY ARE TRYING, BECAUSE THE LAW ALLOWS THEM TO, is disgusting enough in and by itself.
@@Jose04537 The law does not allow them to do this in any capacity. You can't sign away your right to saftey and helathy living. They tried a dirty underhanded scare tactic and now their stock is going to plummet.
SOUTH PARK PREDICTED THIS…. Omg.. We’re all going to be Human Centipads soon….
Sadly, that sounds like a way better time right now.
That was about Apple... which owns a large portion of the total stock of Disney. 🙃
“Why won’t it read?!”
I was just watching that episode this week. Season 15 episode 1
They didn’t predict it… They already knew about it and tried to send a message through comedy
Binding arbitration should be illegal
It is
@@jarrodskufcagaming5203I don't know if it is, given that ultra unregulated places like Delaware exist.
But I assure you that it's illegal in many states and in many countries. Binding arbitration is generally used when both parties of the contract are formally and materially equal (i.e. two big corporations, or two salesmen with more or less the same resources). But not when one party is disproportionately stronger than the other one.
@@santiagovasquezgomez2136
This is a federal issue, not a states issue
@@jarde1989 I doubt the federal govt can do much about it without messing with the checks and balances system. They need the support of the Congress or the Supreme Court to rule cases like this without frictions.
YES I AGREE!!!😡😡😡
I’d be absolutely ashamed if I were CEO of Disney hiding behind this clause. With as much money as the company has, and as much as it professes to do the right thing, you’d think they’d own up and make restitution.
Also, it's even more worse if the CEO would replace animators with.........
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
The A.I.
Like that Cartoon Network studio were shutdown in this year, i mean the world and the universe has gone mad.
CN GOT SHUTDOWN!?@@alvinhatzasoesedyono289
So if there was accident inside disney, and you were once subscribe in disney plus, you wont be able to fill a lawsut.
Yeah, that's crazy, but it sounds like that is basically what they are saying.
Disney cold hearted and cut throat
Disney has to realize that they can’t be a “happy” brand if they settle their cases like this. The best thing to do is just pay to avoid more customers leaving/cancelling trips, memberships, etc
Avoid all Disney Properties, products, and services.
Disney parks, cruises, media, and merch.
This is messed up
If it was a free trial, there was no actual transaction, no signature, nothing about this is binding.
And over only 50k...
You touched grass? That's binding. Oh no you dropped your mickey mouse ice cream bar. No refunds because you touched grass
Disney tactics are disturbing
They also claim they are not responsible for information posted on their own website claiming it it was all allergen free, which is why the couple even went there.
This is one of the most insane things I've seen Disney try to pull, in all my 34 years of being alive.
Wait. How is Disney responsible for this woman's death?
dang you're an old fella
Talk about a load of miss information. The end of a trail period is also the end of the terms of service contract. It’s not binding unless you decide to make a permanent agreement for services.
everyone going boycott mode but will be buying all Disney stuff 6 months from now. typical idiocy
So true! People are so fickle, even Iin these comments. They're outraged now but will continue to still consume everything Disney has to offer and that's part of the problem.
Sadly true.
Yup, just waiting for the next big thing to be outraged about and forget the last thing. .might as well start eating at McDonald's again ... who cares about their prices now that Disney killed someone.... idiots.
Sorry but I doubt that, see Disney is actually losing profit
Forced arbitration without consent doesn’t work
This is quite evil!
its not a disney owned restaurant, so who cares?
They are not suing disney. They are suing the owner of the restaurant Raglan Road but the likelihood, is that they will go for additional money from disney
But the Terms of Service ain't written for us, it's written for our lawyers. Should be obligatory to add an "easy to read" version as well.
Yeah. This is not going to work. It doesn’t even make sense.
"and its affiliates" So many companies are owned by a handful of larger corporations that this line practically makes it impossible to sue any company, especially when it's included in nearly everyone's Terms of Service.
The judge will likely favor the victim for something as stupid as this.
So a disney + sign up means a stock holder sharer by their definition
This needs a class suite action.
I don't think it should work that way, Disney.
Disney paving the way for corporate Libertarianism.
That being said, if DeSamtis wants a good way to stay in office, he should consider pursuing this incident with Florida's state prosecutors.
@@warlockpaladin2261By law, he is term limited, so he’s out either way. He would have to run for another election other than Governor of Florida.
@@MetroJet2000 Oh well then.
I didn’t pay much attention to this story at first, but you’re telling me this guy is asking Disney for only 50k and Disney is fighting it? That’s disgusting. They should’ve already paid for it all.
Their TOS does not apply! This is just big money lawyers doing what they're paid to do!
Ive always loved Disney, but I honestly hope they fail and something better comes out of it. Disney makes me sick.
This brings attention not only to Disney but all corporations that use binding arbitration and automatic terms and conditions upon the signing up or purchase of a product. What’s the point of signing a contract if you can sneak it in instead? Why can’t the average consumer do the same to companies with terms and conditions: “by accepting payment from me, John Doe, your company agrees to the following terms and conditions…” That would be wild, right? But that’s what companies do to consumers. Why does it seem like companies have more rights than consumers?
1. Sue Di$ney.
2. Sue the restaurant.
3. If I have a severe allergy, I would NOT trust a stranger to make anything for me.
I doubt they allow outside food though.
Shouldn't hold up in court since there was gross negligence and training about food allergies. They should be sued by the health department and the state for trying to get out of this with a terms and conditions from something not even related.
You're talking about the restaurant, right?
what kind of black mirror cyberpunk 2077 tom foolery is this
Check the terms and conditions. Disney is not the only one including this. Check your Playstation plus terms even.
I hope the backlash is massive. Disney truly disgusts me.
Everyone in the comments bashing Disney are the same people who most likely still use Disney+ despite this.
I personally want to cancel my dad’s Disney+ subscription, but can’t because it’s bundled with his Hulu Live account.
i haven’t had it for years, not worth the money at all
i sure aint getting it buddy, you sure you know who your talking about? if your talking about the people that defend disney at any cost, they have to somehow come up with a way to defend this lol
@@HotDogGodornoabsolutely true. (I don’t use Disney+ and after this, I never will.)
I hate nuisance law suits, but forced arbitration has gotten out of hand. It’s in everything and usually the company gets to pick the arbitrator.
TOS policies don't trump laws Disney.
It should be illigal to have people agree to a document that tells you you can't sue them
That needs to be changed
All On Disney and Nickelodeon exclusive rolls need to be removed and revoked for the safety of the children they work with on set and the viewers they influence at home and the extreme damage it has caused globally over many generations since the 50's.
Well I'm not gonna be surprised if in the next few years, the service- retail- and hospitality industry will now ask you to sign a binding arbitration agreement before you even use their service.
your company is in pretty bad shape, Walt.
They should be suing the restaurant and waiter who promised the food was dairy free.
Amen. I don't see how Disney is responsible in any way.
Bro it was literally just an accident,HE DID NOT HAVE TO DO THIS,BUT NOOO MR. I THINK DISNEY+ SHOULD HAVE ADS WENT AND RUINED THE STREAMING PLATFORM FOR ME YOU KNOW WHAT DO YOUR OWN JOB I’M DONE!!!!!😡😡😡
So if I have Disney+ and for example, broke my leg because they were negligent with a ride in Disney land or they were dumping wastes in my backyard, I can't sue them because i have a subscription to their streaming service? Yeah, sorta regretting that yearly I paid for. But definitely not renewing next time. 😂
No. . suing and arbitration is two different things..
@@missaamane8580 Disney is saying the man can't sue because he is subject to binding arbitration. So effectively OP is correct.
Who actually owns the restaurant? Shouldn’t they be the ones liable?
Thank you. At least a handful of people get it.
Whoa, Disney is seriously messed up now.
Disney isnt doing exactly well. Not sure why they would hamstring themselves refusing to payout. Will cost them much more and for years to come. I dont want to go to a place that does not hold themselves accountable.
They just can’t stop hurting themselves, and their investors. What has happened to Walt’s dream?
Disney should have paid the 50K to this guy, these headlines are gonna cost them MUCH MUCH MORE
So If I accept Amazon prime. And a Amazon air cargo ship lands on my home. They could all be in the clear.
We're officially living in a South Park episode
If your signing up for a free trial then the terms and conditions should only apply for the trial period
That may be how it works out. The judge hasn't ruled on it yet.
@@greg.murphyI believe the judge will rule against Disney
Indeed, wouldn't be surprised.
@@greg.murphy where is the lawsuit taking place
Orange County FL courthouse
Agreed to arbitration for ANY dispute with the Company? It should not have legal reach beyond your dispute with THAT service.
Nothing in the story makes sense if that restaurant is not owned or operated by Disney then they shouldn’t be sued in the first place, so no you shouldn’t be “terrified” the story is nothing but Clickbait
A term of service for Disney+ is used to prevent an estate to sue Disney over a death at Disney World...
A Disney+ ToS for sake...
You have the most sensible comment on here. Finally.
Click bait at it's finest. But people fall for it every time
The advertisement was by disney as it was a promotion/ftanchise type of ordeal. He's sueing disney for 50k for wrongful advertising and the restaurant for 5 million for wrongful death.
@@missaamane8580 He's sueing disney for faulty advertising and the restaurant 5 million for wrongful death. Not hard to search this up kids. Turns out when you falsley advertise you get sued, what a shocker.
Remember the south park iPad episode
Human centipede 😂
So the restaurant isn’t owned or operated by Disney but sues Disney. Got it
People always sue whoever has the most money regardless of if they are at fault. They figure worst case they will settle to make it go away even if they aren't at fault.
The death occurred inside a Disney Park, and on the Reedy Creek Business District, the restaurant is on a very complex contract with both entities and operations very much micro managed by the Disney Company, they can’t even fart without permission from Disney
@@hskrgradDeep pockets theory.
@@ytzpilotGreedy Creek development?
Because Disney is legally responsible for all businesses on their property
This is lawyering and they love contracts. But what does it have to do with a restaurant?
Walt Disney rolling over in his grave...or cryochamber
Is this really the hill that disney wants to die on beacuse it really doesn't look good.
But this whole news story is framing this situation incredibly out of context. The lawsuit is against the restaurant itself. Makes sense. Then they tried to include Disney since the restaurant was operating on Disney property. So, in other words, the restaurant wasnt directly owned by Disney.
What the…???????
Does Disney want everyone to cancel their Disney+ accounts before traveling to their parks? Why shouldn’t we just cancel permanently?
It’s for life
Even if you cancel, Disney says their terms still apply to you. They also reserve the right to change the terms at any time.
This story will not make any waves but it will be a full blown mega tsunami!
Boycott anything disney and all of their subsidiaries
And how is her death Disney's fault. They made her eat whatever it was casued her the allergic reaction?
The death didn't happen at Disney World; it happened at Disney Springs. Two totally different things considering the restaurant wasn't owned or operated by Disney. People get up in arms about large corporations putting these fine print things in their terms and conditions (and I hate it as much as the next guy) but this is why they do it. Lets be honest with ourselves here; frivolous litigation has gotten out of hand in this country and it costs corporations billions of dollars in settlements every year which just ultimately gets passed on to the consumer. And yes this lawsuit is frivolous in the sense that they are suing Disney because they have a large pocket book rather than the restaurant owner and operator. This family should absolutely be seeking damages for their lost loved one due to the negligence on the part of the restaurant, but sue the right people.
Disney Spring is apart of Disneyworld. I park in the Orange garage. Deep pockets theory will always be the strategy in civil litigation. The sole reason people go to dine at the properties is because of the association with Disney. Even the McDonalds on the property is one of a kind power by solar energy.
By saying he signed the terms of conditions on their product they are defending themselves that he participated in their product. Otherwise why not say hey it’s not my responsibility or restaurant, go sue them.
Absolutely right. Most people skip over the fact that the family is actually suing the restaurant. Not disney. However the likelihood is that their attorney will go for the deeper pockets, which is disney. If the attorney names disney on the lawsuit and it goes to arbitration, then that's where the disney plus will come into place. It's bad press but at the end of the day, why should disney pay when the restaurant was negligent. That's why they have their own insurance
And yes. This is a very litigious society . You are correct
@@missaamane8580 What is law school? A place to have the knowledge of the intricacies of the law. Why is the law so intricate? Why is ignorance of the law not an excuse? Most people have never walked by a law school.
They can’t throw out this case out because they signed up for Disney+! The parks and the streaming services are two completely different things!
The judges should allow this to go thru, it'll be the worst thing for disney. That way a consumer has no rights when entering disney property. That will let people decide of they want to go. And people wont.
I don't think a judge will buy that TOS for a streaming service is binding for wrongful death at a Disney restaurant
This should be national news everyone needs to know about this..
Yeah someone should tell the National Broadcasting Company to run a story. Maybe they can even put it on their TH-cam channel
What do you think NBC stands for?
I will never sign up for that app, Disney+ is anything but plus
Corporate greed over a life. That is sad and Heartbreaking 💔. They ruined what Walt had envisioned. Boycott Disney on all levels. God Bless The Family 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
😡💢💢SHUT UP! Just shut up! What asinine garbage! Disney is NOT greedy! DON"T EVER BOYCOTT DISNEY ON ALL LEVELS!!!
Disney is a VICITM of Iger's greed, NOT Disney itself! But that's all gonna change!
😡💢💢LISTEN CAREFULLY, buster! My team and I are gonna change Disney for the better, so DROP the stupid, pointless boycott already!
We're gonna restore Disney back to the way Walt envisioned it and kick out the people who are making everyone miserable! We're destroying corporate greed and replacing it with generosity and care for the customers!
I'm serious about what I said! You'd better eat those stupid words of yours right now!
This is scary and sickening … I pray to god their stocks take a hit or people boycott
The real issue is, that Disney does not own that restaurant, the owners of that restaurant paid Disney to establish a restaurant there so technically it is not disneys responsibility
But Disney made representational assurances on their website, stating their commitment to allergen safety.
@@oriontigley5089 they have to, it happened on disney owned property, and in order to look good as a company ,, btw im totally against disney using a “disney plus subscription policy” to defend themselves from being sued, but they do have leverage because they do not own the restaurant nor do they run it, except for maybe “customer service policies” that they told the restaurant owner
@@SammyLaffy You're both correct.
Why are they suing Disney and not the restaurant 😂
Best question out there right now.
They actually are. It's just not newsworthy.
Edit: they are suing Disney for just 50k for advertising that the restaurant is safe for allergies. They are suing the restaurant for a 5 million for the actual death.
I understand the anger and frustration of the family. I fully support holding the restaurant responsible. However I disagree with suing Disney. As they don’t own or operate the restaurant. If the restaurant employees made the mistake are they being sued. If not why not?
Holding people accountable is something we have given up on.
Everyone in the comments is complaining…
But y’all will still rush to watch the latest Marvel movie or Pixar animated film and fill Disneys wallets
oh ill watch them, not on official route
This world is just so cruel and sickening.. 😔
Just take responsibility, Disney!! #smh
A good lawyer can argue it with even or better odds winning
I think Terms and Condition is limited if the condition is life threatening.
Nothing in there was life threatening. It says they can still go after them hard, but in arbitration instead of a courtroom. They go before a judge/attorney either way. The only loss is that a jury isn't involved.
Disney getting to Nestle's level of evilness.