Gun Rights Activist NAILS How Bad The Cargill Decision DESTROYS The ATF & Status Quo... PERFECT
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- Tac Pack: www.tacpack.com
Gun Rights Activist NAILS How Bad The Cargill Decision DESTROYS The ATF & Status Quo... PERFECT. In today's episode we dive into an article from a gun Rights activist who absolutely nails how massively bad the Cargill decision is for both the ATF and the status quo... This is PERFECT.
Articles for Reference:
www.dailysigna...
Now abolish the NFA.
This is going to come off like I'm fishing, but Google doesn't tell me, and my ffl guy is on vacation for the week. Ok, I see alot of guntubers with full-auto "toys" in their videos. Can I still buy one of those? I know I need tax stamps and hoops/hurdles to hop, but is it possible? Google keeps bringing up the NFA and 1985 and relics.
Basically; can I go buy a LEGAL full auto?
Edit: I'm trying something new to work around the nonstop insta deletes.
@@DarenMiller-qj7bu Can YOU still buy one of those? YES ! What state do live in ? Pre 86 (transferables): 175,977 legal machine gun available ! Made before and registered by may 19 1986 !
If it was made before May1986. Guntubers with more modern machine guns are licensed NFA manufacturers which allows them to do conversions.
@@BogDrakonov ok thank you. So I gotta be a manufacturer to have one. Wonder how difficult that is.
From what I understand you need to be an ffl with an sot class 2 or 3, which is yearly payments to hold onto for both. A lot of atf oversight and preferably a storefront business. If you're trying to just privately own a full auto legally that you made, you're going through a ton of hoops and annual costs to maintain. Not to mention needing the machinery to manufacture said lower. Not sure drilling a 3rd hole is allowed, I think you need to build a whole lower from the ground up yourself for it to be legal.
What is really scary is that it wasn't a 9-0 decision
As much as I'd agree, I have to ask, did you really expect the 3 Liberal Justices to vote in our favour? Seriously?
@@cheekibreeki921 You'd expect that a ruling to reaffirm the Separation of Powers would be unanimous.
@@Stan_Vanderakt And that is why we don't need those 3 justices. They're only there to make Partisan based Rulings for the Establishment.
No, what's really scary is that Sotomayor listened to oral arguments where they specifically pointed out that a bump stock didn't meet the definition of machinegun as defined in the law, ignored that testimony in favor of her own feelings that "shoot fast = bad", and then convinced two other justices to agree with her.
That's because those leftwing liberal democrats are only propagandists. They are there to push the leftwing liberal democrats agenda. Not to uphold laws as they are written. And they especially hate the United States Constitution and bill of rights.
ATF needs to be abolished
The constitution can only be changed by a constitutional amendment. This is why the NFA and GCA need to be challenged. Congress passed unconstitutional laws.
Let's see if we even have an election in November 2024! Trump 2024!!!
Same thoughts here.
I see the National Socialists pushing Biden out. Kackles take Command and the Jack Boots come out. We the America First Patroits tell the Communist Party to go pound sand and here comes the UN.
It isn't going to happen. That's why no other dem ran against biden. Game over
Why wouldn't it be a election in 2024.
I think you are correct.
Bidet will get 82 million this time.
Bryan Malinowski is exhibit A of what it means when the ATF starts "redefining" things as they see fit.
Which they're going to keep doing.
That's right plus, sadly he's also exhibit A of things to come if the gun grabbing democrat party doesn't back off.
True. Sadly he's also exhibit A of things to come if the govt doesn't back off disarming law abiding citizens.
Waco, ruby ridge and many others. Janet Reno should have been held accountable.
A child (ATF) will still misbehave until it's punished.
Amy Swearer is a great advocate for the 2A and if you don't recognize her, you may want to remember who she is. She's been advocating in front of Congress, and others, for years and she is, well, a woman! I only bring that up because she does it so well and can put it so well, from a legal and a woman's point of view... on top, regarding the 2nd Amendment (in a positive and great way)!
I hold her in very high regards. She is smart and articulate and is an example of education that worked. ✌
@@brianclassen5221 I agree with everything you said.
Exactly right. Mr./Ms. Congress critter: If you want to change the laws, get up in front of all of us and state your case; then, accept the praise...or, take the heat!
we need to keep pushing until we have constitutional carry in all 50 states.
Until the Law Of The Land is ENFORCED.
My thoughts is there should be some penalty assigned to the ATF! Like losing there financial allotments for a year! Considering all there fuck up they should be disbanded and none of them ever allowed to work in any law enforcement ever again!
Right on Amy, you go girl!
Amy is a BOSSS!!! She brings receipts every time she is invited to a congressional hearing.
When was the last time the ATF worked a case about alcohol or tobacco?
A "Right" taxed, delayed or withheld is not really a "Right"!
Please, SCOTUS, decide on the Chevron case and end this.
baby steps are still steps forward
This is right on the money. Supposedly elected officials want to absolve themselves of their responsibilities.
“Stepped on a rake” I HAD a mouth full of coffee when you said that. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Amy Swearer is amazing. She says exactly what needs to be said.
It's HORSEFRATHERS !
More than 60 years because the NFA AND GCA OF 1968 ARE BOTH UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS WELL
Amy is a goddess. She is all our voices in one incredible woman.
The creative writing abilities, of the ATF, have long been admired, and envied, by those who write fiction for a living.
And the point is they have to be removed from office or put back to enforcement and not litigation or something that they have nore allowed to be 😮
At its core, this was an APA violation (Administrative Procedures Act), and the bumpstock ban was just a symptom of the underlying rot. Only the legislative branch can write laws. ATF 'Rules' cannot by themselves declare someone a felon. ATF is a repeat offender on this point.
Because of a LAZY congress
@@lonniemonroe2714 Concur
Amy Swearer is a goddess! Her brains... my God, her brains....
But it takes to long and costs to much money to fight the stupidity!!!!!!!!!!
All everyone in Washington DC does is talk talk talk and none of them do anything and that's why people don't listen to it
Awesome job Amy, now get more like you to follow along.
How did ATF ever get the power to make laws anyway? That is supposed to belong only to congress.
I hope this starts to impact the EPA.
They are acting illegally exceeding their authority too.
I was pretty pissed at Trump, when he pushed the bumpstock ban. But even that mistake has turned out to be a win, now that it's leading to finally curtailing unelected executive branch overreach.
Seems everything Trump touches turns to gold!
It's a pattern of violation of congressional delegation of authority.
Arbitrarily redefining terms to fit a crime.. That and desperation to maintain chevron deference in spite of Bruen.
Good info, I'm following her on X now.👍
BROTHER!!
I am a mamber of the GOA. Have sent money to SAF. Wondered if an attorneys would tackle a case like this? They have bigger fish to fry...
The case of over reach is very similar to WV vs the EPA.
Says, "Coming home to roost." While wearing a rooster shirt. 😂 Great breakdown on everything!
problem is it takes many years to rectify three letter agency overreach. Need to fix this on front end where any rule changes or laws need Constitutional review prior to being allowed to move forward. Otherwise, their goal is simply to bankrupt the masses.
Thanks for keeping us optimistic brother.
the ruling also predicts what scotus is about to do to chevron
I have watched several videos where Amy has testified before Congress several times, she is a joy to watch. Very articulate and to the point, a refreshing change from the likes of Dettelbach and other bureaucrats. As far as the bump stock and pistol brace fiasco is concerned, personally, I think the legislative bodies should leave these hot potatoes well enough alone. Firearm regulation is not a major topic of concern with the American public. The wide open border, fentanyl, runaway inflation and the very shaky economy in general, the gross overreach of the administrative agencies, and the list goes on and on, all under Biden’s watch.
Thanks for Sharing 👍👍✌
If laws mean what the text says than so should "shall not be infringed"
We need to.have an Election not a selection not a dumb person who keeps shitting his pants and falling downstairs.
He falls up the steps more .
Trump / Langley Outdoors Academy 2024!!!
Alito issued a concurrence that basically said that the original drafters of the machinegun ban would have considered bump stocks machine guns. That's telling me that if Congress passes legislation that bans bump stocks, he'll vote to uphold it.
What a shame they have to do there jobs
Grand Slam...!!!
Gotta love it!!!
Amy!
3 wire good sir!!
The Bonus from this is that Sotomayor said 3 times in her dissent "in common use"! That standard was established in 1939 US v Miller ( an NFA violation case) & reaffirmed in 2008 D.C. v Heller & of course in 2016 Mass. V Caetano on stun guns!
She didn't day "in common use".
EXCELLENT ANALYSIS as per usual. Keep on keepin' on Btandon! 😃
I've seen an article that references you specifically, about Sotomayor by United Liberty. This article was seen on MSN.
That article is titled, "Justice Sotomayor Confirms AR-15's are Protected from bans because of common use. "
Taxiing on the tarmac, gate freedom rings.
Spot on sir. -W. Liggett
The Audio is way better on this video then it was in the last video I watched.
Thanks
Free Matt Hoover
I love this ruling from the Supreme Court, but I hated Justice Alitos little one paragraph concurrence, which basically said Congress could pass a law banning bump stocks, thereby ignoring Bruen.
Amy is super solid!
love the thumbnail with Clarence Thomas laughing .It is funny.All of there laws will go down and we can all sit back and laugh and say well that was way to long to wait---but its over.
FRACTION of THE PROBLEM!! Theres soooooooo much more though 😅
ATF HAS NO POWER TO MAKE LAWS ! IT IS THE CONGRESS THAT MAKES LAWS ! TO BAD CONGRESS DOESN'T FOLOW THE CONSTITUTION ! AND HAS PASSED into law UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS WITH THE OK BY PRESIDENTS for political reasons by misuse of words to make it sound correct when it was and they knew it was not constitutionally correct bill to pass into laws against the citizens right ; spelled out in the constitution ! each unconstitutional law needs to be voided by the supreme court ; but that is their game first it has to be heard and ruled on in lower courts before the supreme court get to hear and rule against the unconstitutional laws passed by congress and any president !...
Chevron deference just got knocked down a peg.
What does this case mean for Matt Hoover
Hey! You sound normal today. Glad you are better!!!!🎉
dead on my friend
Election.
Too big to rig.
WINNING
i wonder how or if cargill will have any effect on the matt hoover/ auto key card case
No effect.
👍
👍👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
BEWARE SEPTEMBER FOLKS. THE HAMMER DROPS
🇺🇸🇺🇸
👍🏻👍🏻
It doesn't matter who ask (Trump ) for this to be done. What matters is congress did not change the law or definition, so don't hang all of this on Trump , if the shooting had not happened the Democrats would have found another way to step on the bill of rights and the constitution ,that's what they have been doing since the Civil War (they lost).
Hey brother
😮
You didn't quite land the plane as you fail to mention that even Congress does not have the power to pass legislation on this
Hi
😊😊👍🏼👍🏼
Time to start suing all these spending bills I'm sure the language is quite vague and should not allow the spending
Think you are on to something very important 🤔
Even if Congress passed a law saying bumpstocks are against the law, it would be unconstitutional ! A bump stock does not make a semi-automatic rifle fully automatic ! Next they will go after binary triggers and finally all semi-automatic firearms.
Congress can pass laws, but none should violate our constitutional right ! We are a Republic, and our forefathers knew what a tyrannical government is capable of.
First comment
First
It should have been 9-0 but it was 6-3 and those 3 prove that they are just democrat activist and shouldn't be a judge anywhere.
The Democraps will still make you fight every single infraction.
FJB
If ever there was a time to go after the machineguns ban and the whole NFA its NOW!
Brandon thanks for good veido but you blew it on the uscca
Looking forward to the Raimondo v Loper decision soon, that is seeking to overturn Chevron deference, which in turn is enabling all these administrative agencies' rules being made.
The atf will not reclassify bumpstocks as machine guns. It can't afford to, because if it does, ALL gun bans are on the chopping block. Why you ask? ""There were about 520,000 bump stocks in circulation when the ban went into effect in 2019"" - this is WELL past common use, and would make a cause to end ALL machine gun bans - up to and including the NFA which authorized the ATF to exist in the first place. This also kills the NFA.
Well, one would THINK that this issue SHOULD have been resolved in the 2022 case of WV et al v EPA!
Since THAT didn't happen, hopefully THIS one will help stop other over-reach by UNELECTED BUREAUCRATS!
What's with the TH-cam warning and lecture before I open a Langley Outdoors Academy video?
That’s a new one . I have never had that happen yet.
Makes the tyrants job much easier , when the legislative branch is delibritaly vague and ambiguouse. Thats why bills should be stand alone bills. Much much easier to sort out the bs . And exactly why the government puts together huge package bills no one has time to read.
30,000 pages ...and oh yeah we vote after midnight tonight .
That middle paragraph at 6:09 describes the mentality at the very core of progressive "philosophy"; constantly redefining laws (and the Constitution itself) to support their world view.
Amy is a great woman who knows what our constitution means