Will be checking this one out. Wasn't enthused with all the extra fees Phoenix was charging. Their splicing just seems to lower my liquidity when I make a big withdraw to an on-chain address then charge me more in sats if I deposit more BTC since splicing adds more liquidity. If swaps are the way to go and are custodial, think this is the route for me.
Yep they’re using Boltz Exchange under the hood which is performing submarine swaps between L-BTC and Lightning whenever you need to send/receive Lightning sats. I think we’ll see this type of embedded swap provider model in more Lightning wallets going forward. The swaps are atomic in the sense that they either happen or they don’t (hence no one other than you is in custody of your funds) and while this still can create some complexity for the swap provider it lowers the burden on the end user to worry about channel mgmt
@@IanMajor In terms of liquid vs fedimint, if the same companies that form the liquid federation would set up an 11 of 15 fedimint, what would the tradeoffs be? I'm guessing proof of liabilities is one that works better on liquid
When BTC maxi/ influencers stop fading Bitcoin 'BCH' we could see significant BCH gains Will Bitcoin 'BCH' follow Bitcoin 'BTC' from $460 to $70,000 ? (given enough time and the prices BTC is expected to reach) Bitcoin Cash is up over 300% in one year, around twice as much as BTC... The BCH chart and price looks like Bitcoin in 2016 BCH has the same genesis block as BTC The same miners The same halvings The same 21M max supply 🍿
Yea Liquid would still have more programmability, and I believe they also harden their key setup with hardware but assuming the fedimint did the same, then from an overall security standpoint those two setups would be quite similar
CoinEx offers Bitcoin future trading, but its a custodial or centralized crypto wallet, which decentralized / non-custodial crypto wallet offers bitcoin future trading ?
![CAMPปลิ้น | รวม Highlight 2024! PART [1/2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hnvNnvYloU/mqdefault.jpg)
Will be checking this one out. Wasn't enthused with all the extra fees Phoenix was charging. Their splicing just seems to lower my liquidity when I make a big withdraw to an on-chain address then charge me more in sats if I deposit more BTC since splicing adds more liquidity. If swaps are the way to go and are custodial, think this is the route for me.
aqua is like muun. btc not mainchain but liquid. sidechains like rootstock and botanix also will integrate Lightning bridges, Thats cool
Yep. I think we’re going to see Lightning bridges become a major meta in wallets going forward and they make a ton of sense with different side chains
Very good . Thank you
So if I understand correctly Aqua doesn't give you lightning channels but L-BTC in a way that is compatible with lightning
Yep they’re using Boltz Exchange under the hood which is performing submarine swaps between L-BTC and Lightning whenever you need to send/receive Lightning sats. I think we’ll see this type of embedded swap provider model in more Lightning wallets going forward. The swaps are atomic in the sense that they either happen or they don’t (hence no one other than you is in custody of your funds) and while this still can create some complexity for the swap provider it lowers the burden on the end user to worry about channel mgmt
@@IanMajor In terms of liquid vs fedimint, if the same companies that form the liquid federation would set up an 11 of 15 fedimint, what would the tradeoffs be? I'm guessing proof of liabilities is one that works better on liquid
When BTC maxi/ influencers stop fading Bitcoin 'BCH' we could see significant BCH gains
Will Bitcoin 'BCH' follow Bitcoin 'BTC' from $460 to $70,000 ? (given enough time and the prices BTC is expected to reach)
Bitcoin Cash is up over 300% in one year, around twice as much as BTC...
The BCH chart and price looks like Bitcoin in 2016
BCH has the same genesis block as BTC
The same miners
The same halvings
The same 21M max supply 🍿
Yea Liquid would still have more programmability, and I believe they also harden their key setup with hardware but assuming the fedimint did the same, then from an overall security standpoint those two setups would be quite similar
The more options we have, the better.
Thx a lot for your videos!
You are most welcome!
FYI: it seems and in the Aqua FAQs it says that the Buy Bitcoin and the Swap buttons do not work in an iPhone. Anyone know why that is??
Very strange - I can’t find any additional detail
thanks for your efforts🧡
which non - custodial wallet offers bitcoin future trading ?
I think CoinEx might support that? I would check out some of the resources here: koinly.io/blog/top-no-kyc-crypto-exchanges/
@@IanMajor Thank you
CoinEx offers Bitcoin future trading, but its a custodial or centralized crypto wallet, which decentralized / non-custodial crypto wallet offers bitcoin future trading ?
Is it open source?
I was recently wondering this, so I looked unto it and can confirm that *yes,* Aqua is open source.
It is indeed jan3.com/blog/aqua-wallet-now-open-source-software/
Are LBTC and lightning recovered with your phrase??
Yes your backup should recover everything
👍
Too long with the preambul.
Not everyone watching has context. You can refer to video chapters to skip ahead
"Preamble"?
So it seems that anyone who has your phone can see your seed phrase, correct? Surely that is a deal breaker, is it not?
P r o m o S M