What did Jesus look like? Italian police use the Holy Shroud to develop facial image
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- Click here to receive the latest news: smarturl.it/Rom...
Visit or website to learn more: www.romereports...
Investigators also looked into what Jesus may have looked like as a child.
---------------------
ROME REPORTS, www.romereports.com, is an independent international TV News Agency based in Rome covering the activity of the Pope, the life of the Vatican and current social, cultural and religious debates. Reporting on the Catholic Church requires proximity to the source, in-depth knowledge of the Institution, and a high standard of creativity and technical excellence.
As few broadcasters have a permanent correspondent in Rome, ROME REPORTS is geared to inform the public and meet the needs of television broadcasting companies around the world through daily news packages, weekly newsprograms and documentaries.
---------------------
Follow us...
Our WEB www.romereports...
FACEBOOK / romereportseng
TWITTER / romereports
PINTEREST / romereports
INSTAGRAM / romereports
![เขามัทรี - เอ็กซ์ ศุภกฤต - จอนนี่มิวสิค [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AS9ufKuQIVs/mqdefault.jpg)
Who's here from The Metatron?
You know it
Yup
👍
Yup
Jesus
Im only here because of Metatron. There's so much wrong with this approach 😂
same here... 😅
what did you expect from -the spanish inquisition- them carabinieri? 🙄
@@kittytrail they are polizia(scientifica) di stato.
but you still hit the point... 😇
@@jagger3148 😏
"it is wrong because a youtuber who goes by the name Metatron said it was wrong" - logic level ZERO
Looooooool. Dude looks like an extra from Vikings.
Looking forward to the rest of the Metatron video. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
fuck metatron
I just came from the video
If he looked like a viking or a celt all of the Jews and Romans would run and hide.
lol..
Me too.
I will not comment on anything faith related, but I WILL say that this doesn't look quite right and I think they accidentally recreated Weird Al's face instead
Frrr
Praised be the Al
It's not coincidence my friend!
that might explain why they almost never catch any criminals with this stuff... or maybe they're the talented descendants of the Great Paintress Cecilia Gimenez of Zaragoza(PBUHPP*) as there's some eery likeness if you remove the cap. 🤔
* Peace Be Upon Her Painting Prowesses
I was just about to comment that
Metatron brought me here and I had a good chuckle after watching this.
The fact that they chose his eyes to be blue is very misleading given the facts we know about Jesus and how extremely rare blue eyes were among the people of Galilee at the time of Jesus's Birth.
so, you're saying that "rare = impossible"? 🙄
that's quite a scientifisticuffycally sciencey statement there mate. 😋
The comments are full of praise and adoration. Idiocracy isn't that far off :(
Zeffirelli the prophet knew Jesus personally....
@@kittytrail Nah, but your comment shows that you are anything but scientific. Rather you are just a moron.
@@kittytrail What do you think is more likely: That Italians would portray Jesus as somebody that resembles them, or that Jesus did looked just like all his people did? Jesus was so regular and common looking that when he started his ministry all the people from his city doubted him cause he was just another regular joe in their eyes.
I feel obligated to say, while this is fascinating, people need to remember that what Jesus looked like has no bearings on his teachings or words, getting hung up on his appearance does nothing but cause un-needed strife.
What the BIBLE says he looked like is exactly why there’s a conversation about what language he spoke which branches off into his word which has been translated thousands of times. Gee, I wonder why. It matters. If it doesn’t matter then why is every single portrayal of him in movies all played by white men? It’s just ridiculously unbelievable that a white man lived in the desert well into his 30’s without SPF and died on a cross instead of skin cancer. But hey, he turned water into wine. I guess he turned water into sunscreen too.
I’m here from Metatron, and I think what was attempted in this video was just really hard to do. There was obviously guesswork involved with creating this image of Jesus because it’s hard to know additional details of what He looked like when all you have is a colorless shape of His face from only one particular time of His life. When there are unknowns, biases, and only what people already know, people tend to fill in the blanks. In this case, the result was a face that resembled something from a renaissance painting because it was created by Italians.
yeah, idk why didn't they just make the final picture black&white or monochromatic in general
My issue with the shroud is that the head is incomplete. It is a rectangular, two dimensional slab with a carving in it. A real head would be twice as wide as the one on the shroud. The cloth would have draped over the sides of the head and over the ears. There are no sides of the head imprinted. There would have also been imprints of the ears on the side of the head imprint. It is not a representation of an actual head that was under a cloth.
You are right. But the image on the shroud was not put on there as it lay over the body. From what I've read it is as if it was extended and some sort of energy burst imprinted the image. The image, however, has 3D information stored in the way it was imprinted on the threads. Go read about it! It's really mysterious.
@@indridcold8433
TRUE!😂
This is top of the list of one of the dumbest things I've seen all day.
the fact they even relied on a cloth which authenticity is already questionable makes it even less likely to be jesus
I'm Giovanni Giorgio, but everybody calls me Giorgio.,, proceed to call Metatron...
For the non-verifiable traits, wouldn't have made more sense to refer on the average look of the population of the area at that time, rather than to European iconography? While this combination of tones is not impossible, it is also not very likely (also considering there are no descriptions hinting at such uncommon traits in the Gospels, letters and other sources of the period).
[blue-eyed Italian writing]
Actually recent archaeological DNA evidence shows that fair skinned blue eyed people migrated to Israel from Northern Turkey and Iran 6,500 years ago. Those genes would have been well established in Jesus time.
It is also a fact that the local population of Israel in Jesus time looked much different than today. It wasn't until the Muslim conquest of Israel in 600+ AD that the local population was replaced with darker skinned Arabs.
The Ancient Israelites were genetically sequenced and they were blonde and blue-eyed, see the study published In the Journal, _Nature Communications_ titled, *"Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of Population Mixture in Cultural Transformation"*
@@shainazion4073 lol wut? That sounds like some serious conspiracy theory nonsense.
@@Ezghiel Read the article, it is a well written article in a peer reviewed journal.
A paleontologist forensically reconstructed skulls from ancient Israel from different periods of time and they were all Caucasoid.
At the time of Jesus' birth, the area was 99% people of Nubian descent. The cemeteries proved that. I am not biased because I am not European, Arabic, nor black. I believe Jesus was likely black. I really do not care what he really looked like. The message and the sacrifice are the important part, not the aesthetics of the messenger and Son. The Arabic population did not come until much later after Jesus resurrection.
Here because of Metatron...
And after seeing this LMAO..
I can't wait to go back and watch the rest of his video...
I am super skeptical of this umm shroud, and this ahh cops recreation of Jesus's face...
Blue eyes?? REALLY???
The likelihood of someone born from there.. Hazel yeah maybe , but blue eyes were extremely uncommon... just saying...
I am skeptical...
Plus, he is from Jerusalem. White skin is really rare. Because of that, he was probable either black or olive skinned. Although in most churches he is depicted as white, he I most probably not that. The churches wanted to make him more familiar to people. Because of that, they depicted him as looking European.
@@FaidoPlays If jesus was black the Romans would have noticed that and wrote about it, as they did about him, but never mentioned that he looked like a sub-saharan african.
@@FaidoPlays Plus just because you are not white in a literal sense doesn't mean you are not actually white european, people from the Mediterranean region like the spanish, a lot of italians and even a bunch of turkish people have slightly darker / olive skin colour and they all considered to be WHITE people.
Blue eyes did exist among semetic people, even today. It's just rare. Historical documentation has claimed he had blue eyes.
If Jesus was white, I'm a Martian.
Only if the Shroud is proof to real? What is the point of doing that? Fabricated an answer on a mystery ?
As soon as I saw that they made him with blue eyes I knew that their imaging was way off the mark. Semitic peoples living at that time around Jerusalem had BROWN eyes.
But blue looks better
I read in a letter Pontius Pilate sent to his superior, a description of Jesus of Nazareth & he stated he had blue eyes, I thought the same thing, but 🤷🏼♀️
@@lisasaims3007 where did you see that letter?
@@lisasaims3007 where did you see that letter?
@@lisasaims3007 Pilate never sent a letter to his superior about how Jesus looked..Pilate was the "superior".The only one above Pilate was Caeser and Pilate never sent any letter to Caeser about Jesus.
And once again Jesus is portrayed as a European white male with apparently grey eyes lmao... Jesus lost his ethnicity for the benefit of those in power...
The tiny hat club is in power
Please read the study published in _Nature Communications_ in 2018, titled, *"Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of Population Mixture in Cultural Transformation"*
@@Tsukiakarix Jealous???
So you're using a "relic" that has been proven to date from the 12th/13th century for the basis of your entire arguement... if I was an Italian citizen I would be seriously questioning why the police are using tax payer money and resources on such a flawed and pointless investigation.
Yes! Thank you. That's what I've been saying. The thing is beyond question a fake.
It has not been proven to be fake, in fact the current scientific concensus is that the date of origin cannot be precisely determined because it got slightly burnt a couple of hundred years ago. So STFU
It hasn't. The carbon dating was done on a patchwork of the relic after a fire. Not on the original cloth. Moreover other elements show it is authentic, like the fact that it isn't a painting and in fact a photo negative, as if the body was in a state of radiation at some point I.e resurrection.
@@VirginMostPowerfull . It's obviously not a painting.
I do 100% believe it's a fake, of course, but it's clearly not a painting. It's clearly an actual shroud, and it appears to have been used as a shroud, presumably on a real dead person who's had nails driven through them. Whomever forged it
The "Medieval Repair Hypothesis" has been thoroughly debunked, and let's not forget that the Bishop of the parish where it was originally displayed himself said it was a fake back in the 14th century.
There was a brisk trade in fake religious relics in the 12th-14th centuries, I simply thing this is one of those.
NOTE: The fact that this is (IMO) a fraud does not mean that the New Testament accounts of Jesus' crucifixion, death, and resurrection are untrue. It simply means that this one thing is a fake.
@@mahatmarandy5977 It isn't. Bishops rarely take any miracle claim seriously without further investigation, they are the most skeptical because it's their responsibility to be the first line of defense against falsehood.
Same thing happened with the miracles at Our Lady of Guadeloupe, Lourdes as well I think, took time to convince the bishop.
It is not medieval, we have paintings that copy its form starting in late antiquity if my memory serves. Because it was rediscovered by the artists, they stopped depicting Jesus like a Roman emperor and started a more accurate iconographic tradition.
The shroud itself has so much blood, moreover red blood which means torture was extreme, that you have to believe they tortured some random to do this which is ridiculous they could have just used paint for the blood and no one would have noticed, instead of torture to death.
Even more reasonable, they should have used black because that's how blood looked like overtime, they couldn't have known blood stays red under extreme torture conditions, this was only recently discovered in the modern era.
Moreover it is photonegative, you don't forge something in photonegative before it was even invented lmao.
God bless
Let's see what the Metatron has to say about this, shall we?
You have to assume that the shroud is genuine, which is something we don't know.
The church also not wants it investigated anymore after the 80's exam likely said it was a medieval fake.
Jesus didn't looked like Zeus, stop portraying Him with long hair! He was jewish!
P.s. Metadron got me here! (I think he blasphemed against the Holy Spirit saying Peter spoke from his roman citizen pride in the Bible regarding lenght of hair, cuz Metadron is proud of his lady locks)
Hello Noble one
To be fair in the shroud that is been tested even though its likely fake persons hair is clearly long. Its more odd they chose basicly northern european skin tone, and eyes. Who knows maybe jesus had long hair even if it would not have been maybe fashion for typical hebrew he was basicly hippy hermit so he might have looked bit different in fashion sense even though we cant know that, but his skin, and eyes were likely just like typical jew of the time.
Now that i watched metatrons video even he mentions we cant know hair of jesus because he likely didnt follow norms for his appearance. He very well might have had long hair. Jesus just likely didnt care to groom his appearance so it can be anything
@@KakashHatak3 #Amen brother! 🤗
And, if you listened to Metatron, he says Jesus likely had long hair.
Metatron brought me here.
Curious, how much of people are here from Metatron's video?
Anyway, i will wish everyone luck and happiness.
After 2000 years the authorities still regard Yeshua as a criminal)))
Doesn't look like hair like sheep's wool and skin of burnt copper
Where does it actually say they in the bible?
My hair is like the sheep and my skin is like burnt copper when I tan, plus I am like Moses!
+joebonsaipoland Says those things in the Book of Revelation.. According to the Shroud of Turin, that is what Jesus looked like at THAT time, however, is my guess.. the "hair like sheep's wool" and the rest later in Revelation.
Mary Mclocke
I have hair like SHEEP'S WOOL and I am not black. Well, maybe Black from the waist down.
When my hair gets long for sure BAAAA.
exactly I agree
Bryce Antony Franco da Silva You do know that when the Apostle John wrote the appearance of Jesus, he was having a vision of Him in Heaven, which is in a different dimension outside of time? His Heavenly appearance is not the same as His earthly appearance. He didn't look like that while on Earth, just like you won't look the same when you leave this Earth too. You may have black hair now, or you may be a certain skin color, but you won't keep your earthly traits when you step out of time and enter eternity. Think outside this world brother.
Who else is here because they where watching metatron’s video?
ppl can use images if they want when making a response video. Its under fair use law. They do not need to contact you first.
I may have not seen jesus face but i beleive in him truly and deeply and i hope that one day i will finally meet him
LORD JESUS'S CHRIST
HAVE MERCY ON US AND OF THE WHOLE WORD
Frfr, amen🙏🏾✝️🕊
But I’m pretty sure he should’ve been dark skinned considering the place and time the bible takes place
Jesus Christ is God. He was described in the psalms that he is more beautiful than all sons of men.
@@xrt783 i mean having dark skin does not mean being ugly my dude, you can easily find many beautiful men with a dark skin
I thought the Shroud of Torrin was a 13th century creation.
Actually the original test was an error. The sample were not properly decontaminated and gave a false date. A sample from the shroud properly decontaminated and tested showed that it is a 1st century object.
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 Thank you for that clarification. However, the head on the image is very distorted. There is no image of the sides of the head. It is as if the face was made from a carved board to create the image. The head would look almost like a horizontal oval because of the sides being imprinted on the cloth. It would be nearly three times bigger and not rectangular, as the image shows. I really appreciate your findings on the date of the shroud. Whether it is the authentic shroud of Jesus, or not, the object is truly a treasure because of the age, itself. The blood, even when thought it was a 13th century creation, still came to be of a Hebrew. It is an amazing find.
@@indridcold8433 Have you ever heard of the Sudarium of Oviedo? It is reputed to be the face cloth used in the burial of Jesus. Its history can be positively traced back to 570 AD. Now hold onto your seat, the Sudarium and the Shroud were used to bury the same man. While there is no image on the Sudarium the blood stains match up perfectly with the shroud when wrapped around a human head. The Shroud and the Sudarium both have AB blood on them. The simple fact that the Shroud and the Sudarium were used in the same burial proves the 1300 radio carbon dating of the Shroud is bogus.
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 dude what you're saying is 100 percent false it has never been tested a second time and the most recent analysis concluded that the date range needed to be adjusted by 88 years to meet the requirements for 95% confidence and that still wouldn't put it anywhere near 1st century I have searched and have found no info on any other test the holy see refuses to let it be tested again idk if you commented that to troll or because you legitimately believe that but either way you're wrong
Yes, it is a known fake.
I would love Jesus no matter what race he is, I'm white. Given the demographics and race Jesus wouldn't have lite skin or blue eyes or fine hair.
Remember the people there now are not rhe people there then. In 70 AD after the Jewish revolt the Romans destroyed the Temple and drove most of the Jews from their homeland.
@@popcornchicken6750 know a few blonds and a few red heads among the Jews in our neighborhood .
Nancy Janzen ok, that doesn’t he was blonde. Read your bible bro.
He'd have curly short black hair
@@thecraplordsell4575 I didnt say it did. I also knew some tall Jews. Sephardic Jews tend to be taller. We had a German Catholic and German Jewish neighborhood and all the kids were welcome at the dances at the Catholic Church hall.
That Christ he looks too much European.
By Nero's beard he looked like Alexander the Great as a kid.
The Italian police definitely made him into Roman Jesus.
And not an olive skinned Jesus of his time.
Thought this criminal case was closed! For what criminal activity is the Italian police now again investigating Jesus of Nazareth.
not levant middle eastern features, looks more like a western european from middle-northern europe
The Italian police name is Geovani Georgo but they called him Georgo.
As long as his eyes are blue,then this is not an actual start.
The Ancient Israelites were blonde and blue-eyed, they hace proved that through genetics.
Who's here from the metatron video
Funny, I was expecting Cheddar Man again.
" the pope maybe French but Jesus is English"
That shroud was the artist who painted himself as a mocery
@Debra Little that makes sense, do more research
Giving Jesus blue eyes is like giving dinosaurs feathers.
I agree giving him blue eyes was a silly. This strikes me as an odd comparison though. I'm no dinosaur expert, but what about pterosaurs? And "raptors". Some dinosaurs at least seemed to have similarities with modern birds. And apparently there is some fossil evidence for it.
Lol it went from Jesus to a middle aged mom to an androgynous kid
"What do you mean, I don't believe in God? I talk to him every day."
"What do you mean I don't support your system? I go ta court when I have to"
John 7:38 King James Version (KJV)
He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
In a perfect world this would be the most racist thing a cop ever did
this was already done decades ago by a university team that reconstructed the face using 3D modeling (face and body). This is old hat...not original. The choice of skin tome and eye color is completely incorrect given that he was Levantine, not Greek or Roman. The age regression is interesting, but again, plebian and course. Better efforts have been made, and can still be made by more talented 3D rendering artists.
Well, he looks like Alexander the Great to me.
Blue eyes? Really? I mean green eyes and pale skin would have been definitely within the correct range, as they’re common in the Levant. But blue eyes at that time? (There’s a lot of blue eyes in the modern Levant, but they would have been extremely rare at the time of Jesus).
extremely rare does not equal impossible. much like it's extremely rare to win the lottery doesn't mean nobody ever wins the lottery. or in this case, the genetic lottery. 😏
@@kittytrail yes I agree it’s not impossible, but it does not make historical or geographical sense to assume that he had blue eyes based on the rarity of its occurrence at that time, unless he was not a native.
@@msb8792 are you stating that from a pure statistical standpoint or are you ideologically biased? there's heaps of antique texts describing blue eyed and fair haired pale skinned people in this region not counting all the statuary/art with blue eyes... 🤔
@@kittytrail from a statistical standpoint of course, definitely not ideological bias, that would be silly. I was only talking about the blue eyes by the way, not pale skin, as pale skin (with an olive tint) is actually the most common skin color in the Levant. Definitely not ideological; I personally have pale skin and green eyes, lol, and I come a community that’s historically very indigenous to the Levant.
@@msb8792 so what about statistical outliers? 😽
We have to admit we don’t actually know what the guy looked like. I have seen several reconstructions and they look like different people.
Revelation 1:13-15
Thats what he look like
Dark chocolate brotha
@@mars6541 his skin color doesn't tell you how he looked. Like his facial structure
@@brookelynnpaige7828 well he has wooly hair like so called black people and hes dark skin sooo idk why u bringin up facial structure
@@mars6541 i brought up facial structure because the first comment said that we don't know what he looks like. Yeah he's darker skin but that doesn't tell you what Jesus looked like. You still can't point him out. All for what you know that the picture in this video is what he looked like minus the white appearance. All Black people look different, so there's no guarantee that the black version of him( there's a black version of Jesus that looks different from this painting) is even close to what he looked like, they probably just gave him a typical black facial structure. Therefore knowing one's skin alone isn't enough to know what they look like
@@brookelynnpaige7828 Clearly blk ppl have wooly hair and dark skin. The point is hes not white or so called middle eastern/arab. Hes a so called black man. Obviously there isnt an exact pic of what his face look like. But the bible has a description and that description doesnt depict what the images that society has been perpetuating throughout centuries
I wonder what percentage of the viewers are just here from Metatron
One has to reverse the swelling around the nose and where the beard was torn, and undo the damage to eyelids, lips, etc. The eyes could have been grey and hazel. Facial muscles wouldn't be jarred before getting beaten in HIS Passion.
Right. I also would recommend to make His face a bit rounder, because on the Shroud image, His mouth is open, therefore when closed, the face isn't that elongated anymore, so eventually His face could be a tiny bit rounder than what they come up with strictly from the Shroud image.
The shroud of turin is fake though
I agree. An obvious one. Jewish people covered the head of the deceased with a separate cloth. As in Gospel Of John 20:7
Jesus Christ I waited for the video to end and they did make Weird AL and now I'm wondering how accurate they're computers are for missing people and wanted suspects.?
He doesn't look jewish, he looks italian😂
Actually, you don’t have to look very far. Jesus’s biological brothers will give us a clue how he looks like as they carry the same genes through Mary. For sure Jesus would have some degree of resemblance to them. Also, Mary will give us a clue as He carried Mary’s genes.
Spiritual Genes ?
The Prince of peace painting is what Jesus looked like. It scored a 80-90% accuracy with the shroud of Turin. It was painted by a girl that God blessed named akiane. She painted the portrait of Jesus at age 8 when both of her parents we're atheist and she wasn't introduced to the concept of God or heaven. She said that they we're visions from God from heaven. Her parents ended up convicting to Christianity. And when colton burpo went to heaven, he said that her painting was what Jesus really looked like. And her painting scored a 80-90% accuracy with the shroud of Turin.
Her painting of Jesus even has the same noise as the shroud of Turin. That's 100% Jesus.
@@treek10k is this painting the picture that their using in this video? And also all the videos of ever seen of people going to heaven and meeting God said that his appearance is too complicated to explain for us to understand. I don't think we need to understand what he looked like but who he is
How do you see Jesus biological brother’s?
Metatron gang where you at!
So Jesus looked like Leonardo Da Vinci?
Compare known portraits of Da Vinci. Thats him.
Mother Mary was a virgin before and after Jesus's birth and remained ever virgin mother.
Mary had other children after Jesus, one who followed Jesus and is mentioned extensively in the gospels.
Poor joeseph
Did you check???
This is all up for interpretation. But really, blue eyes? No semitic has blue eyes unless they have recent northern European ancestors who had blue eyes and from the genealogy of jesus, he didn't have any european ancestors
Recent archaeological DNA evidence has shown that fair skinned blue eyed people first migrated to Israel 6,500 years ago from Northern Turkey and Iran. So those genes would have been well established in Jesus time. It wasn't until the Muslim conquest of the region around 650 AD that the genetic of the local population was changed from a Mediterranean based population to a Arab based population. The biblical Philistines were GREEK. The Canaanites live on today in the people of Lebanon from who they get 90% of their DNA.
King David had red hair and blue eyes... in any case these are gray eyes. Not blue.
Really? You obviously don't know about the Jews or Israel. See the study published In 2018, in the journal, _Nature Communications_ titled, *"Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of Population Mixture in Cultural Transformation"*
What makes you think blue eyes are a uniquely European trait, and not the result of a successful genetic mutation from the middle-east or Central Asia, the progeny of whom would’ve been the kinfolk of Christ?
@@sergpie The Israelites in the above study had blue eyes and often blonde hair, dated from 3500 years ago to 6500 years ago.
Looks like the Italians are developing an old school Jesus of Nazareth rpg
Taking a mediaeval "fake" at face value, uff.
okay lil bitch, you must know that
And now back to Metatron's video. 😂
I think Ik the place where we will all know what really Jesus looks like..
The Heaven 😇
(We gotta put him first
SamieCandyCanes what do you mean by a good person ?
@@nadenemanuel9519 What I mean only Good people can go there.. Well if you have a sin.. you may apologize to Jesus and he will accept it..
SamieCandyCanes possibly*
Also you got to believe in what Jesus did/ how he died for us, also that Jesus and god are real, and also no curse words. There probably more then that though.
@@bowbtw I know.
Apart from everything else, how the hell do you discern from that image that it's a 12 year old?
Really... The clearly bearded man on the cloth was a 5ft 8 12yo boy; okay mate.
The Police are good at Face constuction of criminals but will they catch him?
Lol...
Jesus most likely would not have had blue eyes. Yes, blue eyes are aesthetically pleasing but it says in the bible " he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him."
Light skin evolved in Anatolia and the ancient Levantines had high admixture from this group, so not unlikely Jesus had light skin. Blue eyes is more unlikely.
Totally not fake guys.
So jesus didn't look like a traditional middle eastern man and instead he was a white guy with blue eyes and blonde hair?
where did you get that from?
The Ancient Israelites were blonde and blue-eyed, do a websearch, it will show you the study.
The only thing about this is that no one knows what Jesus looked like. Going by that shroud is not advised because that is not the face of Jesus. Basically they might as well have used a negative of Jackie Chan's face to say what Jason Statham looks like. LOL
I have never cared what he looked like. I think if we even really knew…. It would just distract from who he was.
All due respect, I think his skin would be slightly darker - remember, Jesus lived before the times of jews losing their own country, travelling to Europe and mixing with Europeans so they would most probably look slightly more Middle-Eastern back when he lived.
Jews in ancient Israel had blonde hair and blue eyes.
@@shainazion4073 Nope, they did not.
The Shroud is a fake so how can this image based on the Shroud be anything but fake?
the Shroud of Turin Research Project, Inc., (STURP), a team of American scientists and researchers' conclusion are more credible than your's.
@@coop2011r That's fine. There are entire religions based on fantasy and myth.
@@rednaxelaguitar If you are debunking the existence of GOD, then you are debunking the CREATION. Tsk..tsk..that piece of galaxy rock must be intelligent and all-mighty to segregate the internal and external organs of plants, animals, and humans.
@@coop2011r Why so defensive? Did I mention your religion or any one specifically? I could not debunk any belief in just one simple sentence.
Have you considered that the shroud is a negative long before photography and our knowledge of negatives? Also have you considered that it has 3d image encoding in the image? Interesting fact: in the 70's they had developed 3d image reading capability by means of computer capability for image enhancement for the mars program. Do you know that the shroud is the most forensically studied archeological object ever? The image is on the very surface of the linen. It is not a painting. The image is accompanied by blood stains in the same locations that is discribed in the gospels that tell of jesus's crucifixion. They say his blood is ab but i'd like to know if it only has 24 chromosomes. A archeologist named ron wyatt was shown the location of the ark of the covenant just outside Jerusalem near golgotha. It was hidden 500 years before jesus from king Nebuchadnezzar. Ron was shown the location in 1982. He got permission from the Israeli gov to dig it up. He 1st found 4 square chiseled holes...20' below he found a filled in cave under a mound of refuse. Inside he found the table of shobread which is solid gold then the ark. On top of the ark what looked like dried blood he looked up and there is a crack in the ceiling and there was dried blood that had dripped from the crack. Jesus's back had been ripped to shreds his blood ran down the cross and into the hole for the cross. While jesus was on the cross there was a earthquake.... That permitted the blood in the hole to run 20' down and drip on the ark that at that point was lost to the world for 500 years and not "found" untill 1982. Some 1700 years before abraham was told to take his son isaac that he did not have untill he was 100 years old to a place that GOD wouldshow him in the midsts of the mtns of moriah before Jerusalem was there and offer him up to GOD as a burnt offering... GOD stopped his hand then provided a ram whos horns were stuck in a bush. Abraham said that this place shall be called the place where it shall be provided. It being jesus's death that is able to restore a relationship between a HOLY GOD and us who are violators of his HOLY nature. Jesus also said that abraham seen my day and he rejoiced in it. Those hearing him how can you say that abraham seen your day and rejoiced in it? You are not even 50 years old! Jesus said before abraham was I AM! Exodus 3:15 GOD identified himself to moses by this expression and the jews knew full well that jesus was making himself to be timeless and identifying himself as GOD! They took up stones to stone him which is what is called for for the crime of blasphemy. Anyone else would be worthy of that but not jesus as he is GOD! He is not the father! He is not the HOLY SPIRIT! GOD is both one (echad =one a compound unity noun denoting a plurality as in a man and woman coming together in marriage are one! ) as a unity and also a tri unity! Ron had the blood tested. It has 24 chromasomes. All mankind have 46. 23 from each parent. Jesus had 23 from his mother. 1 provided by the HOLY SPIRIT to determine the sex. The jewish people teach that sin is transfered thru the male...therefor no sin for jesus!
Using that shroud as their foundation was their first mistake. Besides that, Jesus, which was his Greek name, was middle eastern. He was not a white man no matter how much you may wish he was.
Light blue eyes.... ROFL Most aryan jesus ever hahahaha Still middle age representations huh?
Since I know you are ignorant of actual history fair skinned blue eyed people migrated to Israel from Northern Turkey and Iran 6,500 years ago. Those genes would have been well established in Jesus time. So it is quite possible he had light blue eyes.
@@CRAZYHORSE19682003 Yeah sure, show me 10 pictures of turkish blond blue eyed ppl, come on... Even now you can find 1/100.
The Ancient Israelites had blonde hair and blue eyes, just do a simple websearch.
He had to be very strong cause he worked as a carpenter the shrouds image is just a small glimpse if you give this information to an ai I wonder what the ai would draw out taking all data into consideration.
He spent several weeks without food prior to his crucifixion, so he was likely heavily emaciated.
I like those kind of things, but let me say His mouth is opened on the Shroud image, therefore his face could be a little rounder when mouth is closed, not that elongated.
Actually he is bearing his teeth as if in extreme pain.
@@ParanormalStories It's possible, ofcourse, you might be right.... Anyway the video is interesting, that there is technology that can "turn back time", to see what one could possibly look like as a child. I wonder if they had my photo, would the result be a high resemblence or otherwise.. Cheers.
If Jesus did in fact exist he wouldn't have been white. He lived in Palestine, so he would have had a darker skin colour
Wrong eyes, wrong skin, wrong overall appearance.
How did you know what his skin colour was? Not to mention how did you verify that the shroud was not a fake?
they're the italian scientific police man, how dare you! 😮
So he looked like a young Dennis Hopper?
He looks to European. He was Jewish. He needs to look Middle Eastern .
Right, he had gray eyes too. Get the hell outta here!
The Ancient Israelites were blonde and blue-eyed, proven through DNA.
God is real 😇🙏👼
Liars and liars
He looks like Handsome Squidward lol
lol is it not more important to know what he said...
No his father said its important you better read.if some one is your savior you should know what to look for.
@@jeremyarroyo360 Amen
Very odd and flawed way to do a reconstruction.
Please show us 33 old Jesus 🙄
The amount of biaises in the methodology is laughable...
The infamous, blue-eyed Jew strikes again.
Since I know you are IGNORANT of actual world history here is a news flash for you. Fair skinned blue eyed people first migrated to Israel 6,500 years ago from Northern Turkey and Iran. Those genes would have been well established in the area during Jesus time. I am not saying he had blue eyes but the archaeological record proved it is possible that he did.
The Ancient Israelites were blonde and blue-eyed, do a search it will show you the genetic studies that show this.
@@shainazion4073 how would they know that. Because if they had those features it'd have to have come from white people for it to be an identifiable gene.
Which it didn't.
So, he looked like an Italian.....well well well...
He was 32 years old when He died abd rosed from the dead.this looks like a old white man and a young white boy.
FAKE NEWS FOR SAD PEOPLE WHO NEED A SKY DADDY.
If you want to know how Jesus looked like, just simply find photos of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. Same entity in a human body and we do have photos, albeit not many.
No. Jesus would've rebuked the Hindu religion and the demons they worship.
assuming quite a bit here I believe... 1st... the 'shroud' now there's a well-founded start...
Authentic bro
The shroud is authentic. I'm enthusiastic about relics but this one is on a whole other level.
Look up some analysis videos on it from recent research.
They mutilated his face to look like someone else and resemble them
The historical Christ was described in Isaiah and in historical documents. He was in no way a resemblance of the person on the shroud of Turin. The historical Christ was not a descendant of Japheth, the progenitor of the Gentiles, which are also modern day White Europeans and their descendants. When does the genetic modification of historical Biblical truths cease?
There is no description of Jesus in the Torah. And, the Jews were olive skinned people often with light hair and eyes. This was told by the ancient Egyptians descriptions of the Israelites, and modern genetic testing. Do a search for, *"Ancient Israelites, blonde and blue-eyed?"*
@@shainazion4073 Keep on believing in Western European liarship. I have seen the artifacts of Biblical pictures and have been exposed to the scholarship of spiritually centered persons. The true Holy Land is on the continent of Africa. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and Judah and their descendants are from there. Pictorial artifacts have the children of Jacob with a Negro phenotype. But think and believe as you please. I also know the truth about the Ashkenazi Jewish people. Their Jewish Almanac makes clear they are not the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but are Edom. Ashkenaz was a descendant of Japheth, not Shem. Those Khazarian Eastern European Jewish people are converts to Judaism. They are not genetically connected to the Israelites and are Israelis. Only 1 tribe is correctly called Jewish out of 12 tribes. The tribe of Judah are the Judeans who genetically are the only true Jews. But again, believe what you will.
@@andrewright7556 What pictorial artifacts? ▪︎Like the frescoes and mosaics showing light skinned people in the ancient Synagogues from the third century? ▪︎Try the Dura Europa Synagogue, or the Huroq synagogue. ▪︎ The Egyptians have pictures of the Israelites from BCE where their Book of Gates shows the Asiatic (Israelites) as being light skinned with striped woven clothing? ▪︎Or maybe the description of Noah, Solomon or Abraham's Sarah in the Hebrew scriptures? ▪︎Solomon is described as "white and ruddy", "with cheeks as a bed of spices", "washed with milk", "eyes like doves besides the water-brooks" (blue-grey eyes) or "his body like polished ivory, Overlaid with sapphires" which means his skin was so translucent that the blue veins showed through it???
@@andrewright7556 Did you look up the study I asked you to? It was published in 2018, in the journal, _Nature Communications,_ titled, `"Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of Population Mixture in Cultural Transformation"*