Comparison: GMC Canyon Denali vs Nissan Frontier Pro-4X Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Mid-size pickup trucks don't change to a new generation as often as their car counterparts. But when they do, it's usually a big update. In this video I take a look at the 2023 GMC Canyon Denali and the 2023 Nissan Frontier Pro-4X crew cab and see how these two stack up against each other.
    The engine in the Nissan Frontier is actually a carryover item from the previous generation but it is a new engine that was introduced in the last year of the previous generation Frontier. It is a 3.8L V6 and it produces 310 hp and 281 lb-ft of torque (231 kW & 381 Nm).
    In the GMC Canyon, it is no longer available with a V6 or a Duramax Diesel. This 3rd generation GMC Canyon is only available with a 2.7L turbocharged 4-cylinder engine. It produces 310 hp & 430 lb-ft of torque (231 kW & 583 Nm).
    The 2024 GMC Canyon Elevation 4WD starts at $45,603 CAD ($39,300 USD) with the 2WD version, that is only available for the American market, starting at $36,000 USD. This Canyon Denali 2024 starts at $59,603 CAD ($51,000 USD) with the as-tested price of $61,698 CAD ($53,350 USD).
    The 2024 Nissan Frontier Pro-4x crew cab will cost you $55,498 CAD ($45,825 USD) with the king cab S 4x4 configuration costing nearly $5,000 CAD less than the Canyon Elevation.
    -----
    ➡️➡️ 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗠𝗖 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄: mgreviews.com/review-2023-gmc...
    ➡️➡️ 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝟰𝗫 𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗮𝗯 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄: mgreviews.com/review-2022-nis...
    ➡️➡️ 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝟰𝗫 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝘄 𝗖𝗮𝗯 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄: mgreviews.com/review-2022-nis...
    👉👉 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲: / mgreviewsblog
    -----
    Vehicles provided by ‪@ChevroletCanada‬ & ‪@nissancanada‬
    -----
    Other reviews mentioned in this video
    𝗧𝗼𝘆𝗼𝘁𝗮 𝗧𝗮𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗮 𝗩𝟲 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄: • 2021 Toyota Tacoma Rev...
    -----
    𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
    0:00 Intro - Don't Forget to Subscribe :)
    1:10 Performance - Which truck is more capable?
    9:33 Comfort - Which one is more spacious?
    16:30 Odds and Ends - What features do they have?
    18:11 Conclusion - Which truck is better?
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @scott8238
    @scott8238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Frontier for simplicity, price and long term reliability.

  • @Blue-moon12
    @Blue-moon12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I own a 2023 Frontier Pro 4x. Drove a 2023 Tacoma and it was not fun or comfortable. Love the Frontier

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for your insight as an owner! I'm assuming no major issues so far apart from regular maintenance?

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MGReviewsBlog Zero issues so far, no recalls or repairs. I added an oil catch can due to the direct Injection engine

  • @mountainhobo
    @mountainhobo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Of those two I would take the Frontier with King Cab and 6' bed. However, there is Tacoma in the same configuration, and with a standard transmission. And then, when you look at prices and fuel efficiency, one begins to wonder, "Why not a regular half ton?" (if you really need a truck).

    • @cassandralee8974
      @cassandralee8974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I agree, I'd go for the Frontier as well out of these two. There's just something about a good 'ol fashioned V6 over a turbo 4

    • @chino7316
      @chino7316 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ehh, the fuel economy is still significant, even if it's not a huge difference, but the difference in price is a good point.

    • @johnnyreb1475
      @johnnyreb1475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You saying you can get a half ton for the same as the equivalent frontier? Maybe for the price of what they charge for a tacoma. I think the frontier 4×4 is about the cheapest 4wd truck there is.

    • @chrisbennett1037
      @chrisbennett1037 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For me I just want the bed. I do VERY light off road and VERY seldom, I dont haul anything or tow anything.. I honestly just want the bed space. Why dont I want a 1/2 ton... I just dont need the added SIZE and parking/maneuverability issues...and i will never need the towing/hauling capabilities.

  • @RKDriver
    @RKDriver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Pros and Cons will be different for everyone. Many will base their opinion on just the look of a vehicle. Others like me, will focus on options like the NA V6 engine, the transmission and the hydraulic steering. I went with a P4X. I love the look, the pricing and the overall simplistic nature of the truck. For me, less doo-dads equals less stuff to break. I also like that the Frontiers are built here in the US. My only con about the P4X is it doesn't have telescoping steering but I knew that going in and that wasn't a deal breaker. Every vehicle will have some feature that some people won't like or is a MUST HAVE. As for bed options, I wanted the smaller bed because I have to park my vehicles in my garage. Every truck I've ever owned has been able to fit in my garage. All my neighbors have to leave their bigger trucks outdoors and that drives me insane. So vehicle size is a huge factor in my buying decision and I think all the mid-size trucks on the market would fit but some better than others.

  • @andregonsalvez9244
    @andregonsalvez9244 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great review and show 😊 ! I am in the market now and I will definitely consider the Nissan Frontier for long-term ownership and reliability . 😊

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      See if you can test drive the 2023 Toyota Tacoma as well before the updated 2024 arrives. You might be able to get some discounts on the 2023 models too.
      My review of it: th-cam.com/video/BjDrIhE_O2c/w-d-xo.html

  • @dennisclouser3458
    @dennisclouser3458 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I'm showing my age here..... but I remember the 80s/90s, and promises of 'V8 power with 4 cyl MPG' from turbos, and how they're now using electronics to make them more reliable compared to previous turbos from the 60s.... Sound familiar? Toyota is now promoting the Tundra V6 turbos as not being about MPG, but torque. Ignore the complexity of twin turbos, or hybrids with extra motors and batteries. My money is on the Frontier..... $8000 less than the GMC with a smooth V6, 9 Spd Mercedes designed tranny.

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Could not have said it better. I feel like the over complicated cars/trucks are moving towards throw away items after 5 years of use or less.

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sadly, we are firmly in the age of planned obsolescence

    • @M1911jln
      @M1911jln 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These aren’t twin turbos, just a single turbo.

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@M1911jln he was referring to the Tundra's twin turbo V6 hybrid engine.

    • @dennisclouser3458
      @dennisclouser3458 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@M1911jln The TUNDRA is available with a V6 with Twin Turbos *S" as I noted. Yes, GM/Ford/Toyota now only have single turbos in their midsize trucks.

  • @Jack908r
    @Jack908r หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Like the look of the canyon better. GM nailed it there. But the value for money proposition goes to the frontier. You just get more with Nissan for less money. Thats what I found in my truck search anyway.

  • @byates59
    @byates59 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I personally would choose the GMC over the Nissan! The GMC is much better looking inside and out! And I prefer the ride quality of the GMC!

    • @Vdeinnar
      @Vdeinnar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Long term reliability of the GMC is a question mark

    • @byates59
      @byates59 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vdeinnar ... I personally have had very good luck with GM products through the years! I currently own a 2005 Chevrolet Express 2500 cargo van that I purchased new in 2005 and other than a few AC problems it has been perfect!

  • @ron4622
    @ron4622 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for an honest review

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

  • @Wowxoxo69
    @Wowxoxo69 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome frontier, cant wait till after market catches up.

  • @JLC-zg5rd
    @JLC-zg5rd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought a 2022 Canyon Elevation Premium in FEB 2023 - was looking at the 2023 Colorado but thought GM would have alot of issues with the redesign and 2.7L Turbo - so i went with the 2022 bought brand new thinking it would have less issues since it has been built the same for the last 7 or 8 yrs -Only have 14,000 miles on it - I have had it at the dealer multiple times banging and metal knocking from the rear end. found a fix on line for the leaf springs clanging fixed 70% but still had clanging - then took it in for a TSB i found for leaf springs its had the right rear drive shaft replaced and Clips replaced around the differential due to excessive play (still has excessive play) not sure i trust it to tow my 4400lb camper this summer - then front differential was leaking all over my garage floor - dealer replaced the seal but took 2 weeks - this is my first GM car in 17 years because my last Chevy was JUnK - i have been buying Toyotas since 2009 (no issues with any of the 6 i have owned 1 of these drove 5 years & had 100,000 miles on it (ZERO ISSUES) - also had 2 Hondas - little to no issues -- I would choose the Frontier - what I am disappointed in the Frontier is they do not have built in Brake Controller and no Telescoping steering wheel - Frontier will be much more reliable - IF Honda will beef up the Ridgeline and increase tow capacity - i would buy that also not sure why this has a line through some of my comment ?

  • @rick9705
    @rick9705 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As much as a LOVE the look of the GMC, I think it has the best front end, width, flare, and overall aesthetics of all midsize trucks I think something like the headlights alone would drive me mad on a daily basis to be a complete deal breaker. And I read way too much about GM reliability compared to all other brands.

  • @mojorisin7317
    @mojorisin7317 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Frontier for practicality and the Denali for long term style and appeal with better performance and ride.

  • @spyder000069
    @spyder000069 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just comparing screen shots of the seating position in the back (14:00 vs 15:33) and there is a considerable difference in body angles. The frontier looks like you are being folded in half. While this might be fine for teens and smaller people I would feel bad sticking adult friends/family back there. While the Canyon has rear hvac I like the side interior grab handles on the frontier. Each of these trucks have benefits over the other its just a matter of where you compromise.

  • @LuisA-rw3ul
    @LuisA-rw3ul 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People complaining about the height of the frontier with the money that you save up because you did get a canyon, tacoma, colorado or a ranger go buy yourself a kit and make it yours 🤦‍♂️

    • @rick9705
      @rick9705 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah if I buy one first thing I'm doing is a 2.5" lift then tire shopping.

  • @davelendzyk
    @davelendzyk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nissan pro 4 x would be my choice

  • @racekar80
    @racekar80 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Denali is way more expensive. A comparison against the Chevy Colorado would have been better.

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      True, but unfortunately I can't pick & choose which demo vehicles I get from the manufacturers. Plus, it's always a struggle to get two comparable vehicles together at the same time.

    • @jarrodpurcell9061
      @jarrodpurcell9061 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've seen a few people in forums complaining that tye transmissions are already going out on their canyon

  • @BillsAutoService
    @BillsAutoService 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    On the canyon, you can rearrange the headlight button to be on main bar always. Same thing with the fog lights. 90% of the time, they are always on Auto. Don't have to mess with it.

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      That's true, it's always going to be there no matter what screen is displayed and most of the time you'll never have to use it because the lights will turn on themselves. But as I demonstrated in the video, it's very difficult & distracting to use if you encounter fog. The lights may not turn on in foggy conditions if it's not dark enough and the bumpy roads make it difficult to operate. My point is, it irritates me when auto manufacturers keep integrating commonly used functions into touchscreens and causing more distractions while driving. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who hates using touchscreens for common functions.

  • @monocogenit1
    @monocogenit1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Frontier. KISS.

  • @jimmycline4778
    @jimmycline4778 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The Nissan sits so low, my neighbor has one and I have a new Colorado Trail Boss, my truck next to his looks a lot bigger! His interior looks so dated compared to mine!

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      The beauty of the Frontier is its simplicity. It drives and feels like a truck. I am not interested in the fancy gimmicks and I think the Frontier will hold up well. Especially the naturally aspirated engine.

    • @jhardwood6960
      @jhardwood6960 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Blue-moon12your 100% right

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      With the money you save you can add if a lift to be as tall as your Colorado. The Frontier also sits on the Titan frame so it's a beefy truck underneath.

    • @dave3682
      @dave3682 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@scott8238 it is true that the Frontier rides on a chopped version of the Titan frame. However, it is worth pointing out that the Titan frame isn't exactly beefy or competitive with other half ton frames as it lacks the rail depth, number of crossmembers, and number of through-welded crossmembers that other half tons have. This was done by Nissan on purpose to shoo customers looking for more capability towards the Titan XD and it's much beefier commercial grade frame.
      It would be more accurate to say that the Titan is a half ton truck on a midsized frame than it would be to say that the Frontier is a midsize truck on a half ton frame.

    • @scott8238
      @scott8238 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@dave3682 incorrect the titan frame is a true half ton frame where the XD is a 3/4 ton frame. You must be thinking of the Tundra C channel frame that is weak in comparison to all other half tons.

  • @johnwhitneykokalis9990
    @johnwhitneykokalis9990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The running lights are a nothing burger. I put my lights on auto and have a steering wheel switch for the high beams. I have only gone into the council screen once to turn on the fog lights, and i did that while i was in the driveway, parked, before i hit the roads. If the lights manipulation are a deal breaker than so be it

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'm not saying it's a deal breaker. I'm saying it's very irritating and can lead to more distracted driving which is what we don't need more of.

    • @johnwhitneykokalis9990
      @johnwhitneykokalis9990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @MGReviewsBlog in my statement above I was trying to convey that inconvenience and safety are a non issue as I have been driving mine for 10 months. Every car or truck that I have owned I have selected the auto lights selection and never touched it again unless I accidentally hit it with my knee getting in and out of the vehicle, and if I wake up in the morning and notice there is fog in my area then I switch on the fog lamps while I'm adjusting the radio or setting the climate controll. That's it. No safety or distraction issues.

    • @tonyb.5768
      @tonyb.5768 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I want to be able to turn my lights on easily. Come on its the damn light

    • @johnwhitneykokalis9990
      @johnwhitneykokalis9990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's it, then... I am installing a clapper mechanism immediately. Lol

  • @johnfontenot7861
    @johnfontenot7861 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The canyon looks massive compared to the frontier, is that just camera angle?

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  หลายเดือนก่อน

      A little bit of camera angle but the truck is also physically bigger than the Frontier. About 3" longer, 4" longer wheelbase, about 5" taller, and about the same width.

  • @4rr44E
    @4rr44E 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Simple. No 4 bangers for me.

  • @fidelbanuelos9601
    @fidelbanuelos9601 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No cooled/ventilated seats in the Frontier.

  • @davidgeorge4113
    @davidgeorge4113 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I looked in 2023 the Denali was $15000 more than the Frontier !

    • @Seenoevilspeaknoevilhearnoevil
      @Seenoevilspeaknoevilhearnoevil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely that's not the Truck's fault that a greedy and faulty GMC dealership, stealership, just go to another dealership that's not a stealership waiting to steal your money with fake and greedy Market Value pricing. Don't buy anything from any dealership that's over MSRP assume always that car sales people are going to try to rob your back account and you'll be able to find a better deal elsewhere 👍.

    • @brianmola711
      @brianmola711 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SeenoevilspeaknoevilhearnoevilTo be fair the Canyon is more of a luxury truck. The Colorado would be the Frontier’s direct competitor in this case.

  • @johnnyreb1475
    @johnnyreb1475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mid size? Just look at the size of that canyon compared to the mid size beside it. Looks like a sierra sitting there. If im looking for small and better maneuverability i want smaller. That price sure isn't mid size is it.

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything is getting bigger from trucks to SUVs to cars. Even the Frontier is bigger than the previous generation. It's what the general public demands and since they're willing to buy it, auto manufacturers are only so happy to produce them.

    • @rick9705
      @rick9705 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's simple manipulation based on the placement and camera angle. You can lookup the actual dimensions on both. Think of the guys that long arm their fish in photos to make them look 3x bigger.

  • @crisikingful
    @crisikingful 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Huh, off roader vs a over glorified luxury truck

    • @MGReviewsBlog
      @MGReviewsBlog  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I can't pick & choose the trim levels that I get from the manufacturers. I have to make due with what I get.