I still can’t decide between the 2020 version and the 2007 version 2020: AMAZING design 2007: WHAT ON EARTH IS COOLER THAN A LEGO AT-AT WALKING ON ITS OWN?!?!?!?!
I'm just really annoyed that none of the AT-ATs after 2007 have printed pieces on the joints of the legs, they look so good and it's such a missed opportunity.
Searched and found this, I was wondering how the troops got off the AT-AT: "The funny part about this is that Lucasfilm had no clue what the answer to this was. They just put them in ESB and thought they were cool, without really thinking about the practicality. However, while preparing the toy lineup, Kenner called them up. Uh, guys? We're trying to design the new AT-AT toy, and we're not sure how the people get on and off. How's it supposed to work? Lucasfilm didn't have an answer. So, the older books like the Star Wars Source Book or the Star Wars Technical Journal will tell you that they got down onto their knees, lowered ramps, and had troops run down the ramps from the body. However, when the Incredible Cross Sections book came out, the authors derived a different theory. They suggested that rather than have the AT-AT kneel, they instead projected large booms from the body, and have troops rappel down zip lines to the ground. It's therefore possible that both are correct, and AT-ATs can do either one, but it's not really clear. The technical drawings of Cross Sections, Technical Journal, and Essential Guide all differ in their descriptions of AT-ATs. In other words, the authors just made them up. But usually, the way that canon gets around that is to say that there were many different varieties of AT-AT walkers. In fact, the old Source Book says that some AT-ATs could be configured to carry AT-ST walkers inside them! So it's definitely likely that they had different configurations." -David Eaton, on Quora
In Return of the Jedi, when Luke surrenders himself to Vader on Endor, you can clearly see an AT-AT standing next to a raised platform with an extended walkway connecting it.
That's probably how they boarded, but getting off would be a different story. It's really cool to imagine an AT-AT getting on its knees for troops to leave, but ziplines are cool too. Let's hope we see one of these happening in a film or show.
@@coconut8192 they also show in the games such as battlefront and jedi fallen order you enter from the body side doors then walk in through the neck into the head to pilot it
I have a theory for the “squinting” view port slit on the new one. For one of the close up shots of the head in empire strikes back, they use a model with a noticeably thinner view port. I’m guessing they used that shot as reference when designing it.
The UCS AT-AT release has brought me back here and has confirmed what I have always thought. Apart from the original 4483 the other Walkers have way to skinny legs and this is a big deal in the overall look of the complete AT-AT.
I'm proud to be the owner of the 2003. Very last set I've ever built before I became a high school student and moved on to other interests. One of my absolute favorite sets.
I think most of the channel voters are a much younger crowd so they tend to favor the newer sets in general. Yes, some of my love for these older sets is nostalgia, but the 2003 AT-AT is one of the best of these old Lego Star Wars sets and really holds up, even to modern sets.
Personally, when he turned it on and I saw it actually moving, I thought the motorized AT-AT looked like shit as well. Maybe it isn't true, but it looked like a strong breeze could have knocked it over.
Proud member of the 2% 2003 vote. I idolized that set too as a child and when I finally got it a couple years ago it didn’t disappoint at all. I don’t see outdated building techniques as a flaw if the set had its heart in the right place, and no one is gonna tell me the 2003 at at didn’t give its all for us Star Wars LEGO fans back in the day.
I was really confused as to why my AT-AT didn't look like any of these. Then I remembered that I got it for a discount but it was missing the box and one of the bags. So mine is apparently a VERY heavily modified 2014 one.
Man, I love your comparisons, they are really thorough :) 2014 AT-AT was very good, 2020 version seems perfect. I'm surprised the first one (2003) still looks pretty well, considering how bad first LEGO Star Wars sets were designed...
I got the 2007 one for Christmas in 2007 and it was probably the best gift I have ever received. So many memories building and playing with it with my dad. it also had that handle on top for easy mobility. its fallen apart a bit since then but the skeletal technic remains still stand in my closet.
I really still love the 2003 version. It's a little fragile as a play set, but I enjoy having it on display on a shelf. Plus the legs actually look thick enough
@@ctuk-202 not at all. The body shape is perfect, the legs are spot on etc. It's definatly is better than the former two versions, only the 2020 might be better for some
I think the 2003 AT-AT had the best design from all of these models. He looks by far more like the "real" AT-AT than the others and the old grey just goes better with any set. But since this is my opinion based on the Lego Sets I had as child, im clearly biased there.
From 2018 onwards I've noticed Lego has become super dedicated to their new meta of focusing on accurate appearing kits and I think that has a lot to do with their shift in target audience with changes to their marketing. Now days they have fully embraced the older generation of Lego collectors who care more about accuracy and display model quality kits than kids do when it comes to their expensive show piece model kits with focusing on marketing their different ranges at specific target audiences within their customer base. And this also was forced on them with shifting customer trends. Lego seems to only really have two age group audiences now; Adults and Kids, that's it. As most teens are more interested in video games and sports currently.
I remember owning the 2014 one and when I was holding it at 7 years old, I had so much trouble building it and in the end I decided to just tear it apart and now looking back at it, I really regret it and I hope to get one to have as part of my collection
William Blazo thank you, you are such a great person i truely had no idea what he was talking about! I’m sure you have lots a friends with how nice and generous you are!
I am a HUGE AT-AT fan. I love this vehicles so much. The 2020 version brings so much justice to this iconic vehicle that I thought previous iterations were missing. I can’t wait to get my hands on it.
ok boomer Ultimate collectors series. It’s a expensive series of sets known to be for adults, they don’t have play features, and are usually 100$+. Look up UCS LEGO models, they’re awesome
i like how the 2003 atat is really tall, and the dark grey goes well with the set. also its cool that 3 2000s sets had the same speeder bike build in different colors
I still love the 2014, because to me it just looks the most pleasing to have on display. New ones just doesn’t have they look that the 2014 gives. I also remember that I bought the 2014 on like the last day it was going to be in stores. Since it was going to be discontinued. I had the option of the at-at which I bought or the other discontinued star destroyer.
I have the 2003 AT-AT, and I've ended up messing with the neck connection to keep it on. While I still love it, I eagerly await the 2020's release- maybe even going so far as to pick up a few of em ;D
Just bought the 2020 walker I’ve been working way too much to relax and finish it but I’m pretty satisfied with my purchase. Also I love the fact you include inflation adjustments I just appreciate that a lot
The first AT-AT has a genuinely impressive build and I feel like the following years were a pretty big let down. I mean they were better in a technical sense but they were kinda missing the allure of the first one. I mean that was up until 2020 which is such a huge improvement over every other build, they really utilized as much space as possible and the body looks so much better. It's the improvement upon 2014 is truly remarkable
After watching your review, I really like the 2020 version of the AT-AT mainly because of how the cockpit is able to hold 3 minifigures. That mimics what you see in the movie really well. Also I like how the back is very spacious for additional troopers, weapon and the speeder. I have never owned an AT-AT before so I can't wait for it to come out so I can get it. Thank you for your review! Happy building!
giving the fact that you have all of the at-at's i am going to rate them like this 1. disappointed by lack of playability and space, the fact that only one at-at driver fits, very inaccurate but I love the color-pattern used by lego. 2. disappointed by the lack of playability that comes with lack of space (2 in 1). Good figures but the fact that it walks by his own is just absolutely mindblowing. 3. disappointed in every way. 4. i like it a lot, lots of space,good figures,good props(blaster,speederbike) and i love the playability. Very cool set over all 5. maybe the best out of all of them, the most accurate, maybe slightly better then 2007 but not by a lot.
I love the AT-ATs because they are one of my favorite Star Wars vehicles. I only have the 2020 AT-AT and now got the huge UCS AT-AT and cant wait to build them soon :)
The 2020 version looks amazing.. good use of space, accurate design and makes for an awesome display piece, but man.. seeing the 2007 walk is a thing of beauty! Great review, and I think ultimately the ranking in the end is correct
Just thicken the legs on the motorized one with some plates and fine a way to interstate the new head on and baby you got yourself the ideal 2021AT-AT.
I immediately recognized the one I had as a kid. The 2007 had a little built in handle. It opened up to store a couple of troopers and luke. Had a motor and it would walk across the room. Miss the good times!!
After watching. Yeah it didn't have designated places for people, but I promise you can throw them in there!! And OMG i forgot how easy it was to put in reverse when turning off, that presented problems once or twice.
Love the comparison video Ryan! One suggestion - your new ratings system allots quite a few points to opinion relative to the other categories. Maybe you could average the opinion scores of the fans and yourself for the future comparison videos to fix that. Keep up the great work! Can we see a Jedi Interceptor comparison next?
I have 2003 version of the at at. And I personally love it. It's big and looks super cool. Also the speeder inside of it is super cool as well. It's a classic among Lego sets.
I can honestly see why. A while back, me and my dad built our own custom AT-AT because we didn't have an official one. It was actually around the size of a UCS AT-AT. Around two minutes after we completed it, it fell apart. It didn't have sufficient support due to other factors. Unfortunately, that's a problem I can't see TLG overcoming currently, they've said so themselves.
a friend of mine has the Motorized AT-AT and I came over for his birthday and we watched The Mandalorian because he doesn't have Disney+ while I built the AT-AT and it was a very fun build
I really like the front faceplate design of the middle one (especially that place with a slit on the front), but the other ones (maybe with exception of the first one) really look bad for me, and also less movie-accurate
Despite having the older grey I find the 2003 model to be the most screen accurate to this day. The other ones just look off in proportion and design imo
as someone who owns the 2007 its FANTASTIC but i can't suggest buying it nowadays since alot of those panels are *Barely* holding on with 2-3 stud connections *at most*. I love it dearly for its functionality but the bad outer 'shell' that makes it look like an AT-AT is depressingly loose. On the inside its nice and secure but its like a metal frame with a paper exterior.
![ลองสั่งของจากแอพ temu ถูกจริงหรอ?? ( part : 1/2 ) [โกงไหมครับ ep.89 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RTcZSQTiDZw/mqdefault.jpg)
Which AT-AT is the best? (Rip polls)
"This Monstrosity" Is!
2020 is the best
The motorized AT-AT is the best. I used to own one, and had fun playing with it as a kid.
2020 is by far the best!
2020
I still can’t decide between the 2020 version and the 2007 version
2020: AMAZING design
2007: WHAT ON EARTH IS COOLER THAN A LEGO AT-AT WALKING ON ITS OWN?!?!?!?!
I'm just really annoyed that none of the AT-ATs after 2007 have printed pieces on the joints of the legs, they look so good and it's such a missed opportunity.
An interior
The winner still 2007
If you could implement the functions of the 2007 one into the 2020 then that... would be my favourite
Get both and motorized the 2020 version lol
I like the 2020 version because it doesn't waste any space.
I like the 2020 version because it doesn’t waste my money
Sean Baker-Jervis that would be fantastic
@Sean Baker-Jervis that would be great... if they do that I will totally get it lol
exactly. if a set doesn't make the most of its interior I won't buy it
Yeah but it needs more snow troppers
Can't wait until 2070 when you'll be comparing 37 AT-ATs. 😂
It will be like a 3 hour video lol
Well uh, yes joke
But can I just say, this guy may be dead by 2070, but yes in the joke
In 2070 we will compare real at-at with lego
we will compare with global warming when we are all dead
The 2003 one surprisingly up really well! However, the 2020 one's design and the 2007 one's function is just incredible.
The 2003 version holds up incredibly well considering how old of a set it is
11:01 “Mom you’re embarrassing me in front of the other AT-ATs!”
Underated comment
🤣😂😂🤣
Lol
Avengers reference
@@armit7586 Bruh
Searched and found this, I was wondering how the troops got off the AT-AT:
"The funny part about this is that Lucasfilm had no clue what the answer to this was. They just put them in ESB and thought they were cool, without really thinking about the practicality.
However, while preparing the toy lineup, Kenner called them up. Uh, guys? We're trying to design the new AT-AT toy, and we're not sure how the people get on and off. How's it supposed to work? Lucasfilm didn't have an answer.
So, the older books like the Star Wars Source Book or the Star Wars Technical Journal will tell you that they got down onto their knees, lowered ramps, and had troops run down the ramps from the body.
However, when the Incredible Cross Sections book came out, the authors derived a different theory. They suggested that rather than have the AT-AT kneel, they instead projected large booms from the body, and have troops rappel down zip lines to the ground.
It's therefore possible that both are correct, and AT-ATs can do either one, but it's not really clear. The technical drawings of Cross Sections, Technical Journal, and Essential Guide all differ in their descriptions of AT-ATs. In other words, the authors just made them up. But usually, the way that canon gets around that is to say that there were many different varieties of AT-AT walkers. In fact, the old Source Book says that some AT-ATs could be configured to carry AT-ST walkers inside them! So it's definitely likely that they had different configurations."
-David Eaton, on Quora
In Return of the Jedi, when Luke surrenders himself to Vader on Endor, you can clearly see an AT-AT standing next to a raised platform with an extended walkway connecting it.
Coconut 81 wwhat, didn't notice, cool fact thx
That's probably how they boarded, but getting off would be a different story. It's really cool to imagine an AT-AT getting on its knees for troops to leave, but ziplines are cool too. Let's hope we see one of these happening in a film or show.
@@coconut8192 they also show in the games such as battlefront and jedi fallen order you enter from the body side doors then walk in through the neck into the head to pilot it
Stefan Sauvageon / What-a-Twist very long
Been waiting for ages to see this comparison
been*
Bin? You okay?
Bin? You good bro?
Gryyyphon I don’t know why but when I type something it types something else
Are you sure about that
is nobody gonna talk about how the legs are too skinny on all but the oldest one....?
Hello
idk that’s true
Fr
but the newest one, the legs are too thick, aren't they?
Hi
The 2007 one gets too much hate. I have it and it is literally one of the best sets ive ever owned. I MEAN COME ON! IT WALKS!!!!
I’m thinking of getting an expensive Lego set. Should I get the 2007 ATAT or the 2020 one or the millennium Falcon or the imperial star destroyer ?
@@Gamezar69 what about the 2021 AT AT coming out this year for $800
You’re like my favourite Star Wars reviewer, you have inspired me to create my own lego channel. I would love some support and feedback
I have a theory for the “squinting” view port slit on the new one. For one of the close up shots of the head in empire strikes back, they use a model with a noticeably thinner view port. I’m guessing they used that shot as reference when designing it.
I will not like because it has 66 likes
@@famousbowl9926 dude, nobody cares
@@APerson5569. imagine getting scared of numbers lol
@@rohankishibe6433 he making an order 66 joke
@@rohankishibe6433 you must not truly love Star Wars if you think it’s because he’s “scared of a number” lmfaooo r/whoooosh
The UCS AT-AT release has brought me back here and has confirmed what I have always thought. Apart from the original 4483 the other Walkers have way to skinny legs and this is a big deal in the overall look of the complete AT-AT.
Actually the legs are too thicc on that one, the legs are supposed to be thin
I'm proud to be the owner of the 2003. Very last set I've ever built before I became a high school student and moved on to other interests. One of my absolute favorite sets.
I think most of the channel voters are a much younger crowd so they tend to favor the newer sets in general.
Yes, some of my love for these older sets is nostalgia, but the 2003 AT-AT is one of the best of these old Lego Star Wars sets and really holds up, even to modern sets.
The shoulder and neck area on the motorized AT-AT is rough. Moving legs seemed to come at a severe cost to looks.
Well, its 2007 tech
@@ai00436 lego be like: I am limited by the technology of my time
Function over looks
@@zachduperron8543 Try explaining that to a legit collector
Personally, when he turned it on and I saw it actually moving, I thought the motorized AT-AT looked like shit as well. Maybe it isn't true, but it looked like a strong breeze could have knocked it over.
Proud member of the 2% 2003 vote. I idolized that set too as a child and when I finally got it a couple years ago it didn’t disappoint at all. I don’t see outdated building techniques as a flaw if the set had its heart in the right place, and no one is gonna tell me the 2003 at at didn’t give its all for us Star Wars LEGO fans back in the day.
03' have alot of flaws (fragile head and underskirt) but i wouldnt trade my PITA 2003 set for nothing else
SnitchMoJo what do you mean PITA?
I must say there's something beautiful and pure about early 2000s Lego Star wars
@@foberdud7576 PITA = pain in the ass
SnitchMoJo ah gotcha, should’ve known that lol.
I agree tho, that thing is the OG AT AT and every other AT AT looks up to that one imo.
The builds are drastically different, but the figures imo even more so.
I own the 2003 version, I got it as a birthday present when I was younger and still own it years later
I was really confused as to why my AT-AT didn't look like any of these. Then I remembered that I got it for a discount but it was missing the box and one of the bags. So mine is apparently a VERY heavily modified 2014 one.
When you’re so early seven different people are saying first
7, haha. HAHAHHAHA! 7? There are at least 50!
First
First
34,913th
@@kasperbuyens3562 agree
I think the new one is totally the best, but that doesn’t mean I can afford it...
Same
ikr same lol
@@atleyrichardson I say 135 would be better but that's my opinion
Same
JaWa, just steal a broken ones parts
Ryan: Newest, Latest, and Greatest!
Me: Wow Ryan, SpOiLeRs
Yup no reason to watch the rest I guess.
Ok...
What’s the joke?
Abomination The Guy, he spoiled that the 2020 At-At is the best at the start
I love Ryan but all of his comparisons are basically “the newest model is the best design but the oldest one is the best value”
Man, I love your comparisons, they are really thorough :)
2014 AT-AT was very good, 2020 version seems perfect. I'm surprised the first one (2003) still looks pretty well, considering how bad first LEGO Star Wars sets were designed...
I got the 2007 one for Christmas in 2007 and it was probably the best gift I have ever received. So many memories building and playing with it with my dad. it also had that handle on top for easy mobility. its fallen apart a bit since then but the skeletal technic remains still stand in my closet.
I really still love the 2003 version. It's a little fragile as a play set, but I enjoy having it on display on a shelf. Plus the legs actually look thick enough
True. 2003 is still unchallanged. I go as far to call it the most accurate
@@fuckinantipope5511 it definitely isn't the most accurate if anything it's probably the least accurate.
@@ctuk-202 not at all. The body shape is perfect, the legs are spot on etc. It's definatly is better than the former two versions, only the 2020 might be better for some
The legs are actually too thick for that one lol. The legs in the movie are much skinnier.
@@ctuk-202 Are you blind? Look at the 2007 one.
The 2003 one still holds up imo
The 2020 version looks fantastic I can’t wait to get it
Friend: Comes to my house *sees AT-AT* “That thing looks stupid!”
Me: *turns it on*
Friend: “Forgive me for my blasphemy...”
Ha
2020 has the best design, 2007 can literally walk, this is a hard choice
I may not be first,
I may not be last,
But when I see a MandRproductions video,
I click fast
Ender Ben same here
@@doggo6024 No? I made this up. Unless u mean something else.
Ender Ben you didn’t make this up lol
GorgeousMoon573 where’s ur proof Sherlock
Millenium Studios honestly I could just say every new video on TH-cam lo,
I love how the side cannons were made of a wrench pick-axe and spades.
@@opo6206 2014
@@opo6206 watch the video to find out
He has a true grand army of the empire!
I think the 2003 AT-AT had the best design from all of these models. He looks by far more like the "real" AT-AT than the others and the old grey just goes better with any set. But since this is my opinion based on the Lego Sets I had as child, im clearly biased there.
I really love the contrast of dark grey and light grey on the 2003 version.
The 2020 one is better scaled and has a better interior
2003 one looks more menacing
Kenner is the UCS At-At we all dream of.
Hopefully you can remake this video in 2-3 years with the UCS at-at
Woody Collins probably becuase they would always come first, except for UCS hoth
James Hall what is UCS?
ok boomer ultimate collectors series
James Hall ohh okay thanks
The notes at the bottom when he was looking at the boxes were hilarious😂😂
I only ever had the 2014, so I felt disappointed when he ragged on it so hard
Me: Can I go to Bobby’s house to play with his atat?
Mom: no we have atat at home
Atat at home: 0:22
Isn’t this series just him flexing that he has all the Lego sets that he’s comparing
Yeah probably
Pretty much
Isn't this basically him burning the ego set.
No no. He’s got a point
Capital ship comparison: 2006 ISD, 2009 Venator SD, 2014 ISD, 2017 FO SD.
I think he already did that
Honestly i like the 2003 one the most. For the time it was very well done
From 2018 onwards I've noticed Lego has become super dedicated to their new meta of focusing on accurate appearing kits and I think that has a lot to do with their shift in target audience with changes to their marketing. Now days they have fully embraced the older generation of Lego collectors who care more about accuracy and display model quality kits than kids do when it comes to their expensive show piece model kits with focusing on marketing their different ranges at specific target audiences within their customer base. And this also was forced on them with shifting customer trends. Lego seems to only really have two age group audiences now; Adults and Kids, that's it. As most teens are more interested in video games and sports currently.
I remember owning the 2014 one and when I was holding it at 7 years old, I had so much trouble building it and in the end I decided to just tear it apart and now looking back at it, I really regret it and I hope to get one to have as part of my collection
Has anyone else noticed that the port has a brick separator in its mouth in the background?
Porg* and yes
It do be smokin dat weed
William Blazo thank you, you are such a great person i truely had no idea what he was talking about! I’m sure you have lots a friends with how nice and generous you are!
brother moment You might be being sarcastic but thank you
Yea
The 2010 and 2014 versions weren't long enough. I'm glad the 2020 version fixed that.
All of the AT-ATs just standing there reminds me of the boys
What happened to them
@@APerson5569. no remember the meme of the boys? If you don’t look it up
The choice between 2007 and 2020 is really tight for me. 2020 looks better but how can you not love an AT-AT that can walk on its own?
Motorised version is brilliant. Even the Design while not being as accurate is still nice Great video👍
Me: has two dogs
Ryan: has 5 dogs- i mean AT-ATs
I am a HUGE AT-AT fan. I love this vehicles so much. The 2020 version brings so much justice to this iconic vehicle that I thought previous iterations were missing. I can’t wait to get my hands on it.
I’m a huge AT-AT fan too! It’s what got me into Star Wars! Btw, what’s UCS?
ok boomer Ultimate collectors series. It’s a expensive series of sets known to be for adults, they don’t have play features, and are usually 100$+. Look up UCS LEGO models, they’re awesome
i like how the 2003 atat is really tall, and the dark grey goes well with the set. also its cool that 3 2000s sets had the same speeder bike build in different colors
I still love the 2014, because to me it just looks the most pleasing to have on display. New ones just doesn’t have they look that the 2014 gives. I also remember that I bought the 2014 on like the last day it was going to be in stores. Since it was going to be discontinued. I had the option of the at-at which I bought or the other discontinued star destroyer.
Was looking for this comment
that moment when you realize a lego set has been on earth longer than you've been alive
I have the 2003 AT-AT, and I've ended up messing with the neck connection to keep it on. While I still love it, I eagerly await the 2020's release- maybe even going so far as to pick up a few of em ;D
when the german engineers work on 2020 lego at at
if 2020 set had a one more SnowTrooper and a rebel trooper and a turret
Three more is best so you can sit them all down
@@anidiot2284 maybe lego planning for 2021 snowtroopers battle pack
@gal adato hopefully
@@galadato7425 that would be helpful
buy the USC Hoth set, it will solve every problem.
Edit: or 75138 if you don’t have that kinda cash
Just bought the 2020 walker I’ve been working way too much to relax and finish it but I’m pretty satisfied with my purchase. Also I love the fact you include inflation adjustments I just appreciate that a lot
The first AT-AT has a genuinely impressive build and I feel like the following years were a pretty big let down. I mean they were better in a technical sense but they were kinda missing the allure of the first one. I mean that was up until 2020 which is such a huge improvement over every other build, they really utilized as much space as possible and the body looks so much better. It's the improvement upon 2014 is truly remarkable
The motorized AT-AT is coolest because it can walk (!), but the 2020 version is most acurate and looks best.
Imagine if the 2020 AT-AT was motorized
@@teafool753 then we would not have the interior spacing that we have, depending on how they'd get the moving mechanism to work.
@@SWDude2710 well we could kinda scale the size up?
@@teafool753 maybe, but that price increase though.
@@SWDude2710 yea true
The ‘this monstrosity’ is the best!😅 Jk I think 2020 is the best and I voted for that too.
After watching your review, I really like the 2020 version of the AT-AT mainly because of how the cockpit is able to hold 3 minifigures. That mimics what you see in the movie really well. Also I like how the back is very spacious for additional troopers, weapon and the speeder. I have never owned an AT-AT before so I can't wait for it to come out so I can get it. Thank you for your review! Happy building!
giving the fact that you have all of the at-at's i am going to rate them like this
1. disappointed by lack of playability and space, the fact that only one at-at driver fits, very inaccurate but I love the color-pattern used by lego.
2. disappointed by the lack of playability that comes with lack of space (2 in 1). Good figures but the fact that it walks by his own is just absolutely mindblowing.
3. disappointed in every way.
4. i like it a lot, lots of space,good figures,good props(blaster,speederbike) and i love the playability. Very cool set over all
5. maybe the best out of all of them, the most accurate, maybe slightly better then 2007 but not by a lot.
Legend has it, General Veer’s identical brother joined the rebellion and fought each other on Hoth.
Me: clicks faster than lighting
The 68 comments: *henlo*
Lol 😂
Lright henlo is the new meme
(Not hello, did you get it? No? Bruh)
TheFente it’s, been a meme for awhile
@@ZucchiniAT i dont think that you understood the joke
He wrote Henlo and Not hello
TheFente I’m the same guy who wrote the comment
you know a Lego Star Wars set is amazing when they use shots form the underside of the build in the front of the box!
Imagine having 5 ATATs... if only...
Meh. Just buy two TX-130 Republic Fighter Tanks and outmaneuver them.
I love the old grey and sand green that the old set used
I love the AT-ATs because they are one of my favorite Star Wars vehicles. I only have the 2020 AT-AT and now got the huge UCS AT-AT and cant wait to build them soon :)
The 2020 version looks amazing.. good use of space, accurate design and makes for an awesome display piece, but man.. seeing the 2007 walk is a thing of beauty!
Great review, and I think ultimately the ranking in the end is correct
The Mindstorm is a monstrosity because it actually walked.. which is what made it badass
Had no clue there was so much
Just thicken the legs on the motorized one with some plates and fine a way to interstate the new head on and baby you got yourself the ideal 2021AT-AT.
What set was the "monstrosity" I want to know more about it
Ya
This, does put a smile on my face
0:22 I forgot about that boyo, I feel like he should be included (even if it gets last place in every category).
1:24 ahh yes “Auctually”
"2015" "Adjusted for inflation"
You said the 2020 is “squinting” cracked me up lol 😂
I like the 2014 version because I remember wanting it when I was a lot younger. The new just feels smaller.
But it isn't at all
Seeing all the AT-ATs.
Echo Base: Well... we're boned.
Love the vids man. Never thought i'd get back into LEGO, Thanks man!!!
The 2020 is just awesome but I can never get over the "face" LOL
I immediately recognized the one I had as a kid. The 2007 had a little built in handle. It opened up to store a couple of troopers and luke. Had a motor and it would walk across the room. Miss the good times!!
After watching. Yeah it didn't have designated places for people, but I promise you can throw them in there!! And OMG i forgot how easy it was to put in reverse when turning off, that presented problems once or twice.
Love the comparison video Ryan! One suggestion - your new ratings system allots quite a few points to opinion relative to the other categories. Maybe you could average the opinion scores of the fans and yourself for the future comparison videos to fix that. Keep up the great work! Can we see a Jedi Interceptor comparison next?
I have 2003 version of the at at. And I personally love it. It's big and looks super cool. Also the speeder inside of it is super cool as well. It's a classic among Lego sets.
There should be a UCS AT-AT
Like he said, the motorised one technically is
I can honestly see why. A while back, me and my dad built our own custom AT-AT because we didn't have an official one. It was actually around the size of a UCS AT-AT. Around two minutes after we completed it, it fell apart. It didn't have sufficient support due to other factors. Unfortunately, that's a problem I can't see TLG overcoming currently, they've said so themselves.
Hobo With An Oboe whats UCS?
@@ghosthawkk Ultimate Collector's Series.
@@ghosthawkk are u serious
a friend of mine has the Motorized AT-AT and I came over for his birthday and we watched The Mandalorian because he doesn't have Disney+ while I built the AT-AT and it was a very fun build
I really like the front faceplate design of the middle one (especially that place with a slit on the front), but the other ones (maybe with exception of the first one) really look bad for me, and also less movie-accurate
When I saw the head of the 2010 version the first thing I thought was, did they use a shovel as turret
Same
Despite having the older grey I find the 2003 model to be the most screen accurate to this day. The other ones just look off in proportion and design imo
Plz do a review of the 2010 clone turbo tank (day 31)
Thank your I’ve been waiting for this
10:58 WILL YOU STFU WE ARE TRYING TO WATCH THE ATAT BRO! Excellent comparison.
I don’t know why but the one from 2014 just feels more pleasant to look at than the one from 2020
“Man painstakingly scrutinizes his doggos for 25 minutes straight”
Who could have done this
Palpatine: “Each Day we draw closer and closer to........The 501st Battlepack”
as someone who owns the 2007 its FANTASTIC but i can't suggest buying it nowadays since alot of those panels are *Barely* holding on with 2-3 stud connections *at most*. I love it dearly for its functionality but the bad outer 'shell' that makes it look like an AT-AT is depressingly loose. On the inside its nice and secure but its like a metal frame with a paper exterior.
When I saw RIP Toys R Us I laughed cause we still have them in my area at least (not sure if it’s all of Canada)