From what I have seen presented by this entire series, each episode affirmatively demonstrates that the _Value_ of a work of art is never as important to it's price as the story which is told about it defines it's worth.
Perhaps you might watch again when you're in a different frame of mind. The History can affect a greater value of a painting, a piece of Art, an artifact. If it was owned by a famous person, statesman, actor, monarch, if the item has a notable journey, and its actual age, ... all would have an impact on the monetary value. The Arts, whether Paintings, Literary works, Acting, Vocalists ... there are other areas that influence their popularity, demands, successes, and monetary values. Due to my past years of experience with Entertainment, (Vocalists, Bands, Comedians), it was very clear that talent was merely a part of one's potential for success. The genre' and how they packaged themselves were as important to their actual success as talent. The most important Key always being, "What the Artist feels and believes about themselves and their Success." (But then the "Universal Law of Attraction" is Absolute.) We each create all of our own Reality through our "Thoughts + Feelings X Beliefs" = Our Frequency = Our Reality In those cases where the Artist has a Publicist, Manager, and/or any Group/Company involved in the Distribution of their works (Books, CD's, Lines of Art they lend their name to, etc), also has an impact on the Artist's level of fame and their monetary compensation. It is next to impossible to explain all that goes into an Individual's Monetary Success to those whom haven't experienced the business , as the Artist, Family Member, or Professionals who work in the business. There are countless Fabulous Artists of every venue that go unknown by the greater Public, each with potential, but all sharing one common weakness as I described. They don't feel and believe they can, will, or are worthy of. We each get/attract matching Energies/Frequencies. Knowing this is an opportunity to make adjustments and experience far more desirable Life Journey Experiences. ✨
I used to watch this series a while back when I started painting seriously. Watching all the drama was frustrating to me but it made me more aware of my materials, archiving, and provenance. I established practices around this knowledge. The last decade, I haven't painted at all. Watching the series now, I'm curious about the artists introduced here which sends me off to explore more about them. The geek in me loves all the forensics and the researcher in me loves all the history and detective work. Thank you!
I am intrigued, Kate, that you sound like a very serious painter, as you put it, and actually took steps to ensure your "work" survived into the future and yet you then state you have not painted in over a decade... Kate, pick up that brush! 😄 from one painter to another, you gotta keep going!
Lance’s emotional reaction to learning how his grandfather willingly put his entire fortune on the line to save a friend and his family from a violent regime was, by far, the best part of your entire series. That moment was worth everything, it was absolutely beautiful. ❤
Another artist who frequented the French pub and was friends with Francis and all of them was Harold Arthur Drury whose works I have here in Vermont ;over 300 paintings. Harold is my father and I am still working on his provenance years after his death in 2003
Freud painted it and gave it to somebody as a sentimental gift. It was not meant to be treated as something of financial worth. That's why he didn't sign it because that was his intent from the start. It was given as a priceless piece of his heart. I'm saying this as a professional painter myself of thirty-plus years.
At THAT Time, Maybe Yes... but over time things like THAT get "lost"... An Artist should ALWAYS, SIGN & DATE their paintings.... and IF it IS given as a "gift"...it NEEDS to b noted "IN the artist hand" on the BACK of the painting. The front of the painting, can painted Over.
@@DaveRCollins1 They say it is unfinished but maybe it is finished as far as he wanted it to be... If he gave it to someone from love then it might mean that their love and friendship is unfinished... We all know, artists can be cryptic
One thought was he gave the canvas to someone else to paint one. What if he picked up someone elses canves with the landscape already on it. And he blended the landscape into his portret.
25:30 "The local papers are rather detailed about every aspect of these thrilling events. Of the St. John's Fete here, we learn that they had a darts competition, and even something called a 'pig rolling competition'. It was won by a lady called 'Mrs. Death'. And frankly, the mind boggles." I'm dying. roflmao!!
I enjoy these very much. I do wish to say some of us creative folk will change our signatures. It depends on my mood and creative thinking in the moment, or if I'm in a hurry, tired, excited, or bored
Love your channel and always been a huge art fan! Thank you for your wonderful perspectives on people who have these priceless pieces to be a part of their lives especially for the Wilson family. I feel their loss and God has His hands over this wonderful family. If I was rich, I would gladly help them without any hesitation. God bless you all of Perspective!
The colors of the stained glass would have been changed. The gold color with the yellow sunlight would have bleached out the intensity. Change it to red and the color intensifies with the sunlight. A touch of gold in the surrounding details works to highlight those details just as a gold picture frame highlights a painting.
50 million for a Lucian Freud. 50 million for any painting is crazy in my opinion. That is to say if I had 200 million I wouldn't even pay that for a DaVinci, and he's one of my favorites. That said I'm really glad Freud was able to see his work reach high success and money while he was still alive at the time.
I mean, based on the Durig fakes they showed on the programme, Alice's drawing doesn't look like it could be by him at all. Presumably there must be other Durig fakes out there that are closer to this one for the expert to have come to that verdict but in that case I find it a bit strange that they wouldn't show those on the programme...
The expert has over 9 years studied 7000 Rodin and purported Rodin drawings, a good chunk faked by Drurig and other forgers. Then she went on to humiliate the experts at the Musee d’Orsay, a leading French art museum, with her keen eye. Sorry to say, but the lady has the goods. I trust her expertise and thus her verdict. Clearly she’s seen the gamut of what Drurig can do, and he probably ranges from the awful (the Baltimore museum drawings we saw) to the almost passable-the British lady’s drawing.
Freud probably denies he painted that painting because is absolutely terrible! My great-grandfather Raphael Senseman an American landscape painter, when he didn't like what he had painted he simply wouldn't sign it. I assume that this might be the case with Freud here?
I think it is rather good. It has drama. I don't know why Freud didn't sign it, but I imagine if someone he despised had it, particularly if it was stolen, he may have denied painting it, so the person he hated would not profit from it.
To me it looked like someone who "lost everything", i'm assuming that back home she had her artwork spread around her estate, possibly multiple houses, as display. Then whe she fled to England she knows it's not exactly her space? She's merely a guest. So she keeps all of her personal items in her bedroom. It does look like how we use posters, of couse. And decorating our rooms with posters is also keeping our personal items in our personal space. But I don't know, although she still had so much it felt like she really did lose things and was living almost secluded in her room in a way? idk how else to describe it.
She was also a former Queen of France. She’s not about to deck her palatial bedroom in a fine country palace gifted to her by Queen Victoria with posters like she some college dorm flunky. Lol.
I've always put Lucian Freud in the same British post-expressionist box as Francis Bacon. Apparently they do have something more in common from their formative years, Benton End.
😳😳😳😳. So Philip Mould was way off in valuation. He said 75K pounds. But 33K is so paltry. It’s less than half of the predicted valuation. Well, I bet that woman was happy to get anything so she can live in her home for a bit longer. It’s definitely not the outcome of the lovely Aussie couple who sold their painting for $700k.
I absolutely love this show, but I have to laugh sometimes when they go for the drama and Phil is gobsmacked that the painting is actually THE RIGHT SIZE if you measure from painted edge to painted edge - oh my gosh, that little exposed canvas border (plainly visible to the naked eye) was making it seem larger! Who knew! Not me with my 30+ years of experience in the art world 😂😂😂😂
The part of the painting which Freud didn’t touch was the left hand side. He had obviously painted over a horizontal landscape and didn’t have time to fill in the rest of the background, which is why we see the unusual horizontal trees of the underlying painting. The expert said that the entire figure was done by one artist’s hand, with the exception of the trees on the left hand side, and the reason why Freud said he didn’t paint the whole thing. What could be more obvious?
Not being able to see the Other child painting.. it's hard to tell, but, ....possibility... that they were done at the SAME time because MAYBE... they were brother and sister??
Love planks! This workout was a little easy but I enjoyed it! One question: I’ve had both knees replaced… what can I do instead of child’s pose as I can’t put weight on my knees?
for the 2.09 min maria izquierdo...have inherithed one, littlepainting in gouache from a series of circus, a gift from the artist to my grandfather and signed 43 yes thats the time etc
The 'Rodin' IS A RODIN. i BELIEVE YOU MISSED the comparison of the 'green' dancer when next to the 'red/pink' dancer. They are exactly the same tenique/swirrel/size. maybe you weretoo close to see the exactness.
Because rich people don’t want to buy Delaroche. Rich people are after the trendiest artists because they want to buy art that will increase in value. That’s ancient Chinese art (rich Chinese people are now vacuuming up all Chinese art found outside China), the impressionists, the famous modern artists, and old masters. Delaroche fits in none of these categories. Thus his relatively low valuation.
As i watched the painter on your program . at the end i got a vision of what happened . when froade coming into class and not having a clean canvas so the teacher let him use a picture left by a passed student that painted a landcsape he turned rightside up and painted over it. I got chills when it was comfurmed in me . i got a vision so real . FYI . im from the US .
I simply reject one artist over the other , There have been so many great works that have gone unknowable ! So many that its a shame on the art world. ive seen so many diverse art forms , each a very unique form but not accepted as art. being 57 years old, studiedly from the age of 5 I find the art world a very small world. a cruel world. I collect old art from unknown artist and they are brilliant . They are more deserving of the art I fine at these so called prestige art galleries . I dont hold much ado about any art gallery other than to say they create an artist rather than an Artis its self . Art is a person not a profit. hence "starving artist" the galleries are starving the artist for profit.
Anybody else think the big reveal in Episode 3 was obnoxiously overdramatized? Complete with the "28 Days Later" style brooding music, while the hosts act as if this is akin to finding out one of your parents was not related and also a serial rapist, then mildly goading the owner into expressing equally melodramatic disappointment...hopeful she'll cry on camera? And she's...just fine and simply happy to know.
Watching this series... just convinces me MORE.. that I Don't want Anything to do with the"Art World". I'll just stick to buying cheap store prints or slap some paint on some canvas MYSELF.. least I'd KNOW where it came from... and DOESN'T Matter WHO did it.
then stay on the fringe and be forgotten. Like saying you wont play in the NBA youll just throw shots in your driveway. You must have very little faith in yourself to just walk away so easily
@@celtoloco788 🥴 they suggested they might slap some paint on a canvas themselves in lieu of buying some cheap prints because they’re totally not interested in the drama of BUYING art, not selling their own. Not sure that says so much about their confidence as it does about their patience and their pocketbook, but you know, go off…
This is why I would only buy something that I like then it doesn’t really matter who painted because the value is in the subject matter and your enjoyment of it.
I HAD A FEELING THE CAMBODIAN DANCER WASN'T A RODIN. IT'S TOO NICE. 😂❤. PERSONALLY, I LIKE IT BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHER CAMBODIAN DANCER WATERCOLORS. ❤❤❤
When the artist said, he had painted part of it ,to me with the painting, being painted over a landscape,he did not do that part of it…gives the artist the out to say I painted some of it, but he didn’t paint all of it ! a landscape that is still very evident in the picture. Henceforth he can claim he didn’t paint at all so therefore it’s not his. But the fact that he painted the main subject,the person, gives it credence that it is by the artist.
I do not agree that being a fake in the second episode is a pity. It is a very interesting story nonetheless, and it is a nice drawing. Probably the best of Durig, right? It is just not as expensive. Everybody knows Rodin, but not necessarily Durig.
Strange portrait cause if the boy is setting in the shadow of his sister has his sister passed on and the artist incorporated her shadow in the portrait to immortalize her memory.
It is known that some of the great masters would do a painting & have a student finish detail a small part. In some cases it is even known who the student was, and yet the piece is still known as a work by the master. Why should it be any different for Freud?
Owning Expensive things seems to me,to just be a very stressful experience. Always being worried about an Object that is a Target doesn’t appeal to me,, just look at what happened to Kim Kardashian, running around with a very expensive ring . Don’t acquire Things, instead,Travel and acquire Memories.
l don't believe that expert, there's no way it compares to the faker Dureg ones shown, if she said a different forger l would have believed her more. The biggest thing with that pic they said he ran out to get 'paper' because he didn't bring his, should have compared it more forensically to others paper.
Heiman himself, would not hand her a fake!! That doesn't even make "any sense"! That would be an insult! It would be different if someone else gave it to her Mom. But the artist himself, gave the drawing to her Mom!
You were so brave! You took on cult followers and could barely get through. It is hard to fathom that Americans are so little capable of critical thinking and have been so programmed to get their news, their facts from such limited, selective sources that they are unable to manage information, outside of their immediate base. Good job. With time, you'll hone the ability to read what matters most to each individual and work on that issue, directly. People with very little experience in independent thinking or experience, outside their small influences, cannot suddenly be expected to enter into a debate, informed or receptive to new information. Hence, it is equated with flocks in a cult. You have to speak to them as if they were 7th graders and then they can perhaps, vaguely process what you may have to offer, in fact and real life examples.
Because this was France during a period when violent revolutions would explode every few decades. If you worked for the king, you were fair game to be slaughtered. Besides, the revolutionaries were trying to impede an escape by the king. So they logically killed all the people who worked with the king’s horses. I wouldn’t be surprised if they killed the horses themselves.
From what I have seen presented by this entire series, each episode affirmatively demonstrates that the _Value_ of a work of art is never as important to it's price as the story which is told about it defines it's worth.
Perhaps you might watch again when you're in a different frame of mind.
The History can affect a greater value of a painting, a piece of Art, an artifact.
If it was owned by a famous person, statesman, actor, monarch, if the item has a notable journey, and its actual age, ... all would have an impact on the monetary value.
The Arts, whether Paintings, Literary works, Acting, Vocalists ... there are other areas that influence their popularity, demands, successes, and monetary values.
Due to my past years of experience with Entertainment, (Vocalists, Bands, Comedians), it was very clear that talent was merely a part of one's potential for success.
The genre' and how they packaged themselves were as important to their actual success as talent.
The most important Key always being, "What the Artist feels and believes about themselves and their Success."
(But then the "Universal Law of Attraction" is Absolute.) We each create all of our own Reality through our "Thoughts + Feelings X Beliefs"
= Our Frequency
= Our Reality
In those cases where the Artist has a Publicist, Manager, and/or any Group/Company involved in the Distribution of their works (Books, CD's, Lines of Art they lend their name to, etc), also has an impact on the Artist's level of fame and their monetary compensation.
It is next to impossible to explain all that goes into an Individual's Monetary Success to those whom haven't experienced the business , as the Artist, Family Member, or Professionals who work in the business.
There are countless Fabulous Artists of every venue that go unknown by the greater Public, each with potential, but all sharing one common weakness as I described. They don't feel and believe they can, will, or are worthy of.
We each get/attract matching Energies/Frequencies.
Knowing this is an opportunity to make adjustments and experience far more desirable Life Journey Experiences.
✨
I used to watch this series a while back when I started painting seriously. Watching all the drama was frustrating to me but it made me more aware of my materials, archiving, and provenance. I established practices around this knowledge. The last decade, I haven't painted at all. Watching the series now, I'm curious about the artists introduced here which sends me off to explore more about them. The geek in me loves all the forensics and the researcher in me loves all the history and detective work. Thank you!
I am intrigued, Kate, that you sound like a very serious painter, as you put it, and actually took steps to ensure your "work" survived into the future and yet you then state you have not painted in over a decade... Kate, pick up that brush! 😄 from one painter to another, you gotta keep going!
...so true
As a child my family and I spent many hours in Chicago's art museum. My father enjoyed drawing. I really enjoy your show
wow what a story
One of the best shows ever to learn about art and the drama that goes along with these masterpieces.
Episode 2 is a beautifully told story. Was left in tears at the end....
How cute that Archie. He looks as if he stepped right through time from early 1800 on that wonderful suit he had on. So precious.
Fiona's and Philip's compassion towards her is fantastic. CONGRATULATIONS! RIP, Neil!
I was on the edge of my seat, but so excited that her painting was the original and lost treasure royal treasure that they found! How amazing!
Fiona and Philip will sell you the whole seat but you'll only need the edge!
It was very exciting! ... and a most interesting exploration + discoveries.
.
Lance’s emotional reaction to learning how his grandfather willingly put his entire fortune on the line to save a friend and his family from a violent regime was, by far, the best part of your entire series. That moment was worth everything, it was absolutely beautiful. ❤
Another artist who frequented the French pub and was friends with Francis and all of them was Harold Arthur Drury whose works I have here in Vermont ;over 300 paintings. Harold is my father and I am still working on his provenance years after his death in 2003
Thanks for writing and your enthusiasm! If you Google Harold Arthur through you should get his website!
Freud painted it and gave it to somebody as a sentimental gift.
It was not meant to be treated as something of financial worth. That's why he didn't sign it because that was his intent from the start. It was given as a priceless piece of his heart.
I'm saying this as a professional painter myself of thirty-plus years.
Why did he leave it unfinished?
@@DaveRCollins1 and why so ugly...
At THAT Time, Maybe Yes... but over time things like THAT get "lost"... An Artist should ALWAYS, SIGN & DATE their paintings.... and IF it IS given as a "gift"...it NEEDS to b noted "IN the artist hand" on the BACK of the painting. The front of the painting, can painted Over.
@@DaveRCollins1 They say it is unfinished but maybe it is finished as far as he wanted it to be... If he gave it to someone from love then it might mean that their love and friendship is unfinished... We all know, artists can be cryptic
One thought was he gave the canvas to someone else to paint one. What if he picked up someone elses canves with the landscape already on it. And he blended the landscape into his portret.
25:30
"The local papers are rather detailed about every aspect of these thrilling events. Of the St. John's Fete here, we learn that they had a darts competition, and even something called a 'pig rolling competition'. It was won by a lady called 'Mrs. Death'.
And frankly, the mind boggles."
I'm dying. roflmao!!
I laughed at that too. Brits are so quirky and fun. - says an American
Had a good chuckle, too :)
I need more seasons, like 50 of them.
I love the widow and owner of an air bnb! I was so happy for her! Knowing what was at stake…..Awesome I almost cried, for joy!
What a fantastic series...and this is my favorite episode because it so tastefully weaves in the backstory of her husband.
What a joy watching these episodes❤!! Thaaanks❤
❤love this series - such mystery,. Intrigue, plot twists...Hosts & stories are fabulous
I enjoy these very much. I do wish to say some of us creative folk will change our signatures. It depends on my mood and creative thinking in the moment, or if I'm in a hurry, tired, excited, or bored
Love your channel and always been a huge art fan! Thank you for your wonderful perspectives on people who have these priceless pieces to be a part of their lives especially for the Wilson family. I feel their loss and God has His hands over this wonderful family. If I was rich, I would gladly help them without any hesitation. God bless you all of Perspective!
you realize all of these shows are old BBC shows, and 'perspective' has never made a documentary in their lives? You are watching old tv mate
The colors of the stained glass would have been changed. The gold color with the yellow sunlight would have bleached out the intensity. Change it to red and the color intensifies with the sunlight. A touch of gold in the surrounding details works to highlight those details just as a gold picture frame highlights a painting.
Legendary series!
50 million for a Lucian Freud. 50 million for any painting is crazy in my opinion. That is to say if I had 200 million I wouldn't even pay that for a DaVinci, and he's one of my favorites. That said I'm really glad Freud was able to see his work reach high success and money while he was still alive at the time.
L Freud. As an observer in an art school painting dept, teachers will often "correct" over the student's painting
At 18:34 I believe there is a signature next to the hair. It looks that way.
I mean, based on the Durig fakes they showed on the programme, Alice's drawing doesn't look like it could be by him at all. Presumably there must be other Durig fakes out there that are closer to this one for the expert to have come to that verdict but in that case I find it a bit strange that they wouldn't show those on the programme...
Remember the Moma in new york refused to show them their collection of Durig fakes
The expert has over 9 years studied 7000 Rodin and purported Rodin drawings, a good chunk faked by Drurig and other forgers. Then she went on to humiliate the experts at the Musee d’Orsay, a leading French art museum, with her keen eye. Sorry to say, but the lady has the goods. I trust her expertise and thus her verdict. Clearly she’s seen the gamut of what Drurig can do, and he probably ranges from the awful (the Baltimore museum drawings we saw) to the almost passable-the British lady’s drawing.
That was rather well done. I enjoyed every minute of it. Nicely.
Loved your walkabout with the coronation celebrators- ❤️❤️❤️
Freud probably denies he painted that painting because is absolutely terrible! My great-grandfather Raphael Senseman an American landscape painter, when he didn't like what he had painted he simply wouldn't sign it. I assume that this might be the case with Freud here?
Just like all of us, no one likes to claim our worst work
I think it is rather good. It has drama. I don't know why Freud didn't sign it, but I imagine if someone he despised had it, particularly if it was stolen, he may have denied painting it, so the person he hated would not profit from it.
I love the bits of humor that the researcher, whose name I can never get, brings to the program.
its so interesting to see how a bedroom looked back then
Nowadays we have posters... back then they had Gold framed artwork LOL
1:33:19
To me it looked like someone who "lost everything", i'm assuming that back home she had her artwork spread around her estate, possibly multiple houses, as display. Then whe she fled to England she knows it's not exactly her space? She's merely a guest. So she keeps all of her personal items in her bedroom.
It does look like how we use posters, of couse. And decorating our rooms with posters is also keeping our personal items in our personal space.
But I don't know, although she still had so much it felt like she really did lose things and was living almost secluded in her room in a way? idk how else to describe it.
She was also a former Queen of France. She’s not about to deck her palatial bedroom in a fine country palace gifted to her by Queen Victoria with posters like she some college dorm flunky. Lol.
I've always put Lucian Freud in the same British post-expressionist box as Francis Bacon. Apparently they do have something more in common from their formative years, Benton End.
Not a dry eye in this household. We wish all the best and God's speed for the owner and her lovely family
Love the blue feathers and seagulls! 🤩😍
I fell asleep and woke up to this vdieo 😂
Auto play sent me here after watching a doc on the Habsburg chin dynasty which I fell asleep to 😂😂
Congratulations for all your hard work to get a good outcome👏👏😄👍❤️
The Delaroche episode is probably the best of this series.
She sold it in 2019 for 33k GBP
😳😳😳😳. So Philip Mould was way off in valuation. He said 75K pounds. But 33K is so paltry. It’s less than half of the predicted valuation. Well, I bet that woman was happy to get anything so she can live in her home for a bit longer. It’s definitely not the outcome of the lovely Aussie couple who sold their painting for $700k.
Love this series. So much fun: a mystery of art each time.
🎉🎉🎉 Thank you so much for sharing this amazing video! 🙌🌟😍 ! 🤗🌅🎥
I absolutely love this show, but I have to laugh sometimes when they go for the drama and Phil is gobsmacked that the painting is actually THE RIGHT SIZE if you measure from painted edge to painted edge - oh my gosh, that little exposed canvas border (plainly visible to the naked eye) was making it seem larger! Who knew! Not me with my 30+ years of experience in the art world 😂😂😂😂
The part of the painting which Freud didn’t touch was the left hand side. He had obviously painted over a horizontal landscape and didn’t have time to fill in the rest of the background, which is why we see the unusual horizontal trees of the underlying painting. The expert said that the entire figure was done by one artist’s hand, with the exception of the trees on the left hand side, and the reason why Freud said he didn’t paint the whole thing. What could be more obvious?
My best art purchase was at Big Lots.
Lol we are on the same art budget
Not being able to see the Other child painting.. it's hard to tell, but, ....possibility... that they were done at the SAME time because MAYBE... they were brother and sister??
"A pig-rolling competition, which was won by a woman called Mrs. Death-- and frankly the mind boggles." 😂
That part made me giggle 😂
😊😊
Love planks! This workout was a little easy but I enjoyed it! One question: I’ve had both knees replaced… what can I do instead of child’s pose as I can’t put weight on my knees?
The problem with fine art is like cash money. When counterfeits become undetectable people loose faith in the whole currency.
It looks like a self portrait to me. I haven’t finished watching yet but the hair on it is so like the photo of the younger Freud and the mean eyes@!
Interesting stuff. 🎨🖌
for the 2.09 min maria izquierdo...have inherithed one, littlepainting in gouache from a series of circus, a gift from the artist to my grandfather and signed 43 yes thats the time etc
Amazing and beautiful!
They need a show of the Delaroche St Emelies all side by side. Even the stained glass.
The Watercolor is by A. Rodin.
They did not exceed a preponderance of doubt.
The drama they try to draw out takes away from the amazing art
Kits shenanigans are precious
The 'Rodin' IS A RODIN. i BELIEVE YOU MISSED the comparison of the 'green' dancer when next to the 'red/pink' dancer. They are exactly the same tenique/swirrel/size. maybe you weretoo close to see the exactness.
Why is the ORIGINAL Paul de la Roche valued at only £50,000? 🤔🤔🤔
I thought that was pretty low as well
Because rich people don’t want to buy Delaroche. Rich people are after the trendiest artists because they want to buy art that will increase in value. That’s ancient Chinese art (rich Chinese people are now vacuuming up all Chinese art found outside China), the impressionists, the famous modern artists, and old masters. Delaroche fits in none of these categories. Thus his relatively low valuation.
Oh, I was so disappointed by the Rodin! Alice’s drawing is beautiful! It captures the feminine movement of the dance. The other fakes do not.
I agree! It was way better than the other fakes we got to see. If it is by Durig, he outdid himself worth that one.
good work
It truly looks like a dancer, dancing❤😂🎉 Love it!!
As i watched the painter on your program . at the end i got a vision of what happened . when froade coming into class and not having a clean canvas so the teacher let him use a picture left by a passed student that painted a landcsape he turned rightside up and painted over it. I got chills when it was comfurmed in me . i got a vision so real . FYI . im from the US .
This is pretty underrated..
only 75.000 pounds for the Paul Delaroche???? LOL....no no nooooo....auction waaaaaaay better price.....
I simply reject one artist over the other , There have been so many great works that have gone unknowable ! So many that its a shame on the art world. ive seen so many diverse art forms , each a very unique form but not accepted as art. being 57 years old, studiedly from the age of 5 I find the art world a very small world. a cruel world. I collect old art from unknown artist and they are brilliant . They are more deserving of the art I fine at these so called prestige art galleries . I dont hold much ado about any art gallery other than to say they create an artist rather than an Artis its self . Art is a person not a profit. hence "starving artist" the galleries are starving the artist for profit.
Anybody else think the big reveal in Episode 3 was obnoxiously overdramatized? Complete with the "28 Days Later" style brooding music, while the hosts act as if this is akin to finding out one of your parents was not related and also a serial rapist, then mildly goading the owner into expressing equally melodramatic disappointment...hopeful she'll cry on camera? And she's...just fine and simply happy to know.
You need to have Stephanie and all her LaLand girls to get their robes on and help you with that gravel! 😅
You'd think it would be an easy thing to match that DNA to someone else.
Watching this series... just convinces me MORE.. that I Don't want Anything to do with the"Art World". I'll just stick to buying cheap store prints or slap some paint on some canvas MYSELF.. least I'd KNOW where it came from... and DOESN'T Matter WHO did it.
then stay on the fringe and be forgotten. Like saying you wont play in the NBA youll just throw shots in your driveway. You must have very little faith in yourself to just walk away so easily
@@celtoloco788 🥴 they suggested they might slap some paint on a canvas themselves in lieu of buying some cheap prints because they’re totally not interested in the drama of BUYING art, not selling their own. Not sure that says so much about their confidence as it does about their patience and their pocketbook, but you know, go off…
@@bobcatred Not ‘in lieu of’, she said ‘or’. Other than that you are right.😊
I strongly do agree with you!
This is why I would only buy something that I like then it doesn’t really matter who painted because the value is in the subject matter and your enjoyment of it.
The unique notability of the Freud painting could make it worth well over $700,000. - Corey Chambers, Art Broker
De la Roche sold at Christies in 2019 for £33,750.
Y’all need to pair up with Baumgartner Restoration. ☺️
I HAD A FEELING THE CAMBODIAN DANCER WASN'T A RODIN. IT'S TOO NICE. 😂❤. PERSONALLY, I LIKE IT BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHER CAMBODIAN DANCER WATERCOLORS. ❤❤❤
When the artist said, he had painted part of it ,to me with the painting, being painted over a landscape,he did not do that part of it…gives the artist the out to say I painted some of it, but he didn’t paint all of it ! a landscape that is still very evident in the picture. Henceforth he can claim he didn’t paint at all so therefore it’s not his. But the fact that he painted the main subject,the person, gives it credence that it is by the artist.
Huhhhhh
🙄
#2 ✨💛✨👑✨💛✨
I know Neil was in the Room with his wife that day. Course he already really knew the outcome, when he purchased the painting.
Hmm, I can understand why floyd denied painting that. He must've knew the sitter and had sometime bad happen with the sitter.
I do not agree that being a fake in the second episode is a pity. It is a very interesting story nonetheless, and it is a nice drawing. Probably the best of Durig, right? It is just not as expensive. Everybody knows Rodin, but not necessarily Durig.
Strange portrait cause if the boy is setting in the shadow of his sister has his sister passed on and the artist incorporated her shadow in the portrait to immortalize her memory.
Perspective Such musical diction
Wouldn't the Auction house have a record of where they aquired it? (Ste Amelie)
It is known that some of the great masters would do a painting & have a student finish detail a small part. In some cases it is even known who the student was, and yet the piece is still known as a work by the master. Why should it be any different for Freud?
The "Freud Family Freudian Ego"
EGO, EGO, EGO.
Fact
Freud had some very disturbing paintings with very disturbing psyches intricate thought processes
I'm not an art critic but I do paint and I don't understand everyone is so over-the-top over this ugly ass painting
“A fool and their money are soon parted”
The child in the red seems to be crying in disappointment.
Identify the color of the dress with poppys
he obviously hated the painting and felt it was not good that is why he denied it, no artist likes to see their bad pictures!
56:46 I know they are not but the painting and the man look alike😮
Was the artist in touch with the royal family cause is it a painting of the king of England . Charles?
Owning Expensive things seems to me,to just be a very stressful experience. Always being worried about an Object that is a Target doesn’t appeal to me,, just look at what happened to Kim Kardashian, running around with a very expensive ring .
Don’t acquire Things, instead,Travel and acquire Memories.
Always astounded when people handle paints art etc without gloves!!!!!!!!!!! I don’t get it
Now I have the urge to visit Becky's B&B to support her...let me watch the outcome. 🇧🇸
wow
l don't believe that expert, there's no way it compares to the faker Dureg ones shown, if she said a different forger l would have believed her more. The biggest thing with that pic they said he ran out to get 'paper' because he didn't bring his, should have compared it more forensically to others paper.
55:27 The owner of the painting looks much like the portrait.
Heiman himself, would not hand her a fake!! That doesn't even make "any sense"! That would be an insult! It would be different if someone else gave it to her Mom. But the artist himself, gave the drawing to her Mom!
You were so brave! You took on cult followers and could barely get through. It is hard to fathom that Americans are so little capable of critical thinking and have been so programmed to get their news, their facts from such limited, selective sources that they are unable to manage information, outside of their immediate base.
Good job. With time, you'll hone the ability to read what matters most to each individual and work on that issue, directly. People with very little experience in independent thinking or experience, outside their small influences, cannot suddenly be expected to enter into a debate, informed or receptive to new information. Hence, it is equated with flocks in a cult. You have to speak to them as if they were 7th graders and then they can perhaps, vaguely process what you may have to offer, in fact and real life examples.
So Why would "Heiman" hand her a fake. That makes No sense!
It is such a "Beautiful" piece of Art
Why would they kill the stable hands they were just trying to make a living.
Because this was France during a period when violent revolutions would explode every few decades. If you worked for the king, you were fair game to be slaughtered. Besides, the revolutionaries were trying to impede an escape by the king. So they logically killed all the people who worked with the king’s horses. I wouldn’t be surprised if they killed the horses themselves.
❤❤❤❤
He denied painting it because it's crap compare to his most refined work
You smoke some serious weed brother , love youre work