If it had been worth half a million pounds, the family might have *had* to sell it. The cost of insuring a painting like that is way too high for most people to pay - they'd have money but not the painting they love.
Nick said at the beginning that if it were up to him, he'd keep it in the family. I'm happy for him that (presumably) he got to. And the provenance will make for an even more interesting family story. I love your show!
I was thinking the same thing. He loves the painting and now, presumably, won't have to deal with outside pressures to sell it. I'm with him. Whomever painted it (English or no) did a lovely job, and I agree about that figure in the front. As a writer, I'm rather taken by the fact that there was a painter so skilled they thought to throw a Firenzi stamp on it. It tickles the imagination!
Wow! Very British style detective story. Very professional, full of details and never boring. So nice to hear when British people pronounce correctly Italian names. At the end, Mr Hopkins looks to be almost relieved by learning that the painting is not that highly valuable. So, he can keep it within his family as a heirloom dear to his heart.
This result is obviously so satisfying for the owner. He gets to keep and enjoy a painting he truly loves without the burden of family members bugging him to sell it because it is disgustingly valuable. He certainly looked ‘tickled pink’ at the result to me. 🎉🎉❤
Jings I’m sure if it was worth 10m he’d have had no problem selling and taking his share. The irony that the ancestors bought it as one thing then tried to present it as another then generations later get caught up exposing an even bigger fraud is not lost. If he’d not got Fake or Fortune in he could have possibly flogged it for 1/2m. Greed ruins everything.
An anonymous forger working in London before 1808, clearly. I wish they had carbon-dated the wax on the Florence seal. Then we would’ve found if it was English wax or Tuscan wax that was used, as well as the year it was produced.
It is good that the history has been clarified. It is still a beautiful painting with a fascinating story, I am amazed that someone with so much talent was making these views like postcards. It is still a treasure!
Because its not the painting that fetches the money its the name. The painting is every bit excellent but one name would make it into millions and another into few thousands.
Copy and fake are not synonymous. In fact, it was quite common in past centuries for works to be copied by other artists. The painter never signed it as Marieschi, someone assumed it was one.
I JUST LOVE THIS SHOW, thanks for posting, thanks for making it for so long. What a beautiful painting and what amazing artists the 2 front runners are. Only 12mins in so outcome unknown and going from history could be a fake or fortune. But it’s a wonderful piece no matter what.
This series has become my new favourite mystery series. It helps that I have stood on the sidewalk across from this site and so remember it well! A thing of Beauty often has no price!
Great episode, though IDK about the final conclusion about it being a British artist. The reasoning seemed somewhat implausible. To assume that someone would go to the lengths of faking a little known detail of a magisterial stamp of FLORENCE (note not Venice) on what was supposed to be a common souvenir knock off, not a major artist, just seems unlikely. You would assume that IF they could fake little details like the seal so well, then whoever painted that painting would know enough to get not only the methods but Venice right. Second, artist of that period who did "views" often took artistic liberties (I think we were even shown some), changing buildings' proportions slightly or their positions to get a nicer composition. Some painters were more faithful to reality, and some were more willing to be a bit "creative" with some details, but only to the degree that it still remained utterly recognizable as a whole. However, taking artistic license can mean that once in while that which is painted, while visually lovely, no longer makes complete architectural sense. As to the canvas, the artist could be reusing an old canvas of better weave, scraped clean, which may account for the unusual paint layers. So, IDK, but I would not want to disregard that seal, and on such flimsy evidence assume that the painting was British. By all indications it was painted by some unknown Italian artist, probably of the school of Marieschi, who might have lived in Venice for a time, but later returned/moved to Florence. The painting could even have been painted at a later date in the artist's life, when they were painting the scene more from memory and habit.
Re your first point, it wouldn't have had to be the original artist who put the seal on - someone who wanted to sell it later could have done it. They might have known it wasn't a genuine painting by Marieschi, and tried to redirect attention based on an Italian place name. That it was Firenze instead of Venezia might not be such a big deal because the seal was for a court in Firenze that dealt with the possessions of bankrupt families - it wasn't the seal of an original seller. I'm not sure if the purview of a Florence court would extend to Venice, but there's also probably less of a chance that someone who'd bought a painting OF Venice would be living IN Venice. Though it's always possible the painting was by an English person who sold it to an English person who then went abroad to live in Florence, or something of that kind. A lame pun about this painting just came to my mind: the painting is Marie-ESQUE.
@@SchlichteToven The problem is the timing, assuming the seal is genuine. The painting is undoubtedly done in the Marieschi style, so either has to be by someone who worked with him or someone trying to copy him. Marieschi had a rather short but very productive life until 1744, where he worked with a host of other artists to produce his scenes of Venice. Some of them could easily have kept going after his death. Or some other local artist could be copying his work for sale. But it has to end up in Florence in a bankruptcy court before 1808. That's at most 60 years. That's not really enough time to assume it went abroad and back again without some paper trail indicating the fact. So more logical to assume that the painting was either painted in Venice and bought by someone who lived in Florence, or painted in Florence and sold there- sometime in 1750-60, and later to go into a bankruptcy auction at the end of the 1700s.
Sometimes, when it's beautiful, it not being expensive is a blessing. There was an episode where they needed to sell the painting because they had lost their father, but the painting was so at home in their house, it was a shame. Ha, did some genealogy and it turned out the stories (which I only half believed) were true. Family histories can be surprising...
We´re not experts, just art lovers, but to us it was obvious from the first look that this painting was not a ´masterpiece.´ Our disagreement with the original opinions made it all the more exciting to watch. This is an excellent show and the presenters are perfect in this role.
I totally agree with you Chris Reynolds. At first glance l felt that the scene lacked real perspective. That the basilique came too far forward, and lacked the subtle mystery that one finds in, for example, Canaletto’s work, where the sense of space is immense. ( Just one aspect of what l felt upon seeing the painting for the first time) . This may sound arrogant, sorry. Although l am a ( pro.) painter , l cannot pretend to be an expert either. I know a lot about technique, but usually go by gut feeling. Nevertheless, l recognise that whoever painted this work, was a fairly accomplished technicien!
@@lisap9936 I really appreciate your assessment of the work too. It´s lovely to read a response from someone who is an art lover too. Especially of the Renaissance period. Our favourite Venetian artists is Canaletto. We were lucky to spend two holidays of two weeks just in Venice. It was impossible to take in all the culture, famous works of art and ancient architecture in one fortnight. Each day, after 3 or 4 hours we had to come away and slum it in the towns an on beaches because we went into cultural burnout! We did the Doge´s palace in 4 separate visits! I would love to hear your views on the Mona Lisa. I still maintain that this was NOT painted by Da Vinci but by a much loved student perhaps. Hence it being found on his bedroom wall after his death. Also have you seen the Gent Altar Piece? Breathtaking.
What a wonderful episode! Engineering! Chemistry! Art History! Political complications! A grand mystery! Unless you knew better, you might well wonder how an art history episode could be so captivating. But captivating it is. Thank you so much for making this interesting material available to us. I love it.
I highly appreciate the professional and very well done work of the production team. Very skilled video-photography with high end cameras and lens equipment,, and wonderful crips and clean audio-recordings. I wonder what kind of microphones and technique they used? The post editing and music chosen supplements the dramatic and faschinating story and history of this beautiful and creative 1700s painting- It¨s a pure pleasure to listen to Fiona Bruce and Philip Mould, who express themselves in a expressive and sophisticated language. Thank you for this captivating episode. Kind regards from Copenhagen, Denmark.
I wouldn't be so certain this was British. It could certainly have been created in Florence by an artist unfamiliar with Venetian architecture; that could account for the discrepancies the expert notes, and would not require the outlandish theory that the red stamp was some kind of effort to forge an Italian identity.
But the canvas under the microscope? ("More like English canvases in structure. Looser weave.") And then, the paint? I know that I was thinking "So what?" But then, schools dictate certain orders for colours. (One learnt methods and stuck to them).
What a gracious man Nick is. One can only wish him many more years of enjoying his painting and that whoever looks after it after him will enjoy it as much and have as many happy memories.
When I was taught Venetian painting technique at University we were taught to put a layer of vermillion red over the gesso layer (white). Some things make you go hummm...
As a fan of Canaletto, Bellotto and especially Guardi, I enjoyed this so much. It's so carefully done and conducted, and that Nick is a real gentleman. I am sorry it wasn't a Marieschi, but it's still a lovely picture.
Whomever painted it did a beautiful job except for the building mistaken for two and the italian wax seal . I feel this was a reproduction for the tourist trade done by an accomplished artist to rival Marieschi's version for less money . There are many instances all over the world of artist and craftsman creating similar products exclusively for tourists because of the bigger net and easier sale . The color foundation is also similar albeit out of order but shows how the unknown artist wanted the ground layers to resemble Marieschi's . However you analyze it, the technique of a vanishing point reflects on Brunelleschi"s Baptistery painting c 1420.
The cupola is wrong too. Currently it looks like it's zinc, not something you get in the UK and therefore something a Brit wouldn't understand (I had a friend staying and I lived on the top floor in Paris, and he looked out and said "What's that grey stuff? It was just the roofs opposite...). It looks like the guy was used to Wren buildings, the scene could be London with water.
The wax mark gets us back to 1808, forging that would be extremely difficult. But alot of paintings were made for tourists, I find it hard to believe to do them in time you'd use vermilion underneath, it slows the construction time. Also the dark quality of the building lowers acceptance of potential buyers. Still alot of questions!
Nick gets to keep his painting. How marvelous. I too, think it's beautiful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If it's beautiful (to you) then it's valuable.
I agree with many others that Mr Hopkins was in several ways relieved by the result and that it throws light on his family as well as the painting - by Major Gubbins? What a terrific piece of investigation by our two principal sleuths as well as the technical wizards and what a valuable piece of provenience to go with the picture. He should stick a Vintage Cannelloni label on the frame.
This just exposes the silliness of art pricing. “We love the picture but it is worth 20 times as much depending on which we’ll-known artist created it”. The picture doesn’t change. It is so shallow, not about the quality of the art AT ALL. Blaargh.
I’ve always hated that. Just because an artist got lucky enough to get noticed (or maybe get a rich patron) all their works, no matter how good or bad they are, are worth 100x-1000x the value of a superior artist’s who never got his/her lucky break. But then I’m not an art snob…as they say “I just know what I like”😜
" If anything it is more Beautiful Now, than it was' said Nick Hopkins. Very special way of putting the Blow he just received, but oh so Wise and Resilient!
Who would fake an unknown at the time artist? It makes no sense at all. I think this is a genuine Marieschi who made a bunch of identical paintings because they were selling well.
But they WERE known. That was the problem. They were the rock stars of their time. (Think Coco Chanel, Yves Saint Laurent, Tom Ford, etc. and knockoffs).
I think you missed a clue. Why does an English painting appear in the archives of a Florence probate magisterium sometime before 1808? A search of the archives for a deceased Brit might be fruitful. It's also intriguing to think about a young British artist painting it during his Grand Tour. Perhaps he went on to be famous in England? Love this show and all your previous one.
39:10 It's never said that the painting does appear in the archives of Florence. An example is given, but we're told it would take years to conduct such a search. 4:37 The red seal appears on a bracing board of the frame, not on the canvas itself. Perhaps a re-used bit of wood or frame (honest explanation) or an attempt at forgery?
It never said it was in Florence archived. They didn’t search it. But I wish they discussed more on possibility of forging the stamp. Is that something common or easy to do, and compare the stamps’s fonts with other genuine stamps.
The basilica of Santa Maria della Salute Is not by Vincenzo Scamozzi, how it is said, but by the most important Venetian baroque architect, Baldassarre Longhena.
Upon further examination of this episode, I believe this painting should be attributed to Marieschi because of the following features : identical canvas size , identical vanishing point , identical angle pov , identical placement of figures in foreground, identical sizing of buildings . Look at the side by side screen shot @23:27. They are identical except for color and figure placement . Marieschi could have had apprentices do some work creating slight variations in iteration .
Another very intriguing episode! Overall, I can understand why the experts are saying an imitator of Venetian views created this painting. It’s seems obvious that at some point the owner of the painting lived in Florence, hence the wax stamp. Apparently the paint structure layering and the canvas weave are factors too important to just “brush” off. However, the person figures in this painting do seem to resemble Marieschi’s style. Who knew Guardi’s works are valued so highly? Not me.
I would never get to see this show if it wasn't on you tube, thank you so much from someone who watches very little television because most of it is not fit for human consumption.
it is a lovely painting and not the result 'hoped for' but they still get it far back with quite a story and an interesting story thats not a 100% figured out but almost more intriguing because its more mysterious
Great episode. That Florentine seal should be investigate further, IMO. Are there other suspect versions of this type of wax seal around the place? Finally, I'm always intrigued by the uniquely British slant of, "What's it worth?" Whatever the Brits may think about the aesthetics of something, it always seems to get trumped by the mighty GBP!
At 41:23. Now time to carbon-date the wax of the Florence seal for traces of carbon-14. That’ll give you a nice, precise year in which the wax was produced, so a ballpark figure of when the painting was sold in the Florentine auction. It could go back further than 1808.
I'm hook, watched it once and now I can't stop. I don't know what it is about it that captivate me so much. J'imagine que c'est sain, intelligent, captivant, intriguant et up lifting.
Hmm. The imitator's version is more appealing than The Real Thing: the Fitzwilliiam painting less charming and rigid compared with Nick's painting. I think other applications of vermillion by Marieschi should have been examined. At any rate..the .art world is rather nutty.
So, Meyer spielman purchased the painting to mark the 25th wedding anniversary. Nick is loosey goosey with dates, but does mention 1882 in re the wedding. 1882 - 1907 = 25.
The Italian seal is confirmation of it being SOLD in Italy as part of a property sale as the expert told them. It's very likely the British painter found a way of selling the painting in Italy to an unsuspecting buyer initially.
Its a shame that, had it not been for desire to sell it, the painting would have been viewed as a priceless masterpiece for many more generations in Nick's family. Now it's looked at as an attractive copy/forgery, and Nick sees his grandfather with new and more cynical eyes. Sometimes things are better left untouched.
The.supposedly forged stamp does not make sense. One would expect Venetian, not Florentine stamp. Another thing: isn't it weird that Christies' sell forgeries and that the National Gallery exhibited it as Marieschi?
Very enjoyable episode. I can fully understand the final evaluation and the facts supporting that it was painted by a non-Venetian, but somehow the inference that the wax stamp is therefore a false "made in Italy" insignia does not convince. Wouldn't they have falsified a Venetian provenance? Couldn't here be some explanation for the painting coming through the Florentine probate court?
The travel postcards were a bit on the large hefty side in those days. Photographic postcards undermined the copy studios in Venice and left them colourising photographs of the landscapes and buildings. A lot cheaper to lug home.
I thought the wax seal was the seal of a magistrate; perhaps the painter took it to Venice and bribed a magistrate to stamp it? Was the entire stamp forged? How did they match the exact texture and color of the wax? I have questions.
I like this programme so much that i get absurdly annoyed at her and Phillip for not churning them out. I never studied history much and it's like i hold them personally responsible for not giving me my next lesson and amazement.
Is this work a reference to the first Renaissance piece to use perspective by Fillipo Brunelleschi? Because I remember reading about it in art history class, and finding out it was lost media. Honestly, it's a shame to find out, but at least the concepts were preserved by others
I think Nick saying the painting is more important to him as a lovely reminder of a childhood... is priceless.
If it had been worth half a million pounds, the family might have *had* to sell it. The cost of insuring a painting like that is way too high for most people to pay - they'd have money but not the painting they love.
This show is ridiculously fabulous! Thank you so much for posting to TH-cam!
I agree ❤🎉
Me too ❤
❤❤❤
I love the show, but HATE all the spoilers in the intro!!!!😡
Are they still making these videos ?
Nick said at the beginning that if it were up to him, he'd keep it in the family. I'm happy for him that (presumably) he got to. And the provenance will make for an even more interesting family story. I love your show!
I was thinking the same thing. He loves the painting and now, presumably, won't have to deal with outside pressures to sell it.
I'm with him. Whomever painted it (English or no) did a lovely job, and I agree about that figure in the front. As a writer, I'm rather taken by the fact that there was a painter so skilled they thought to throw a Firenzi stamp on it. It tickles the imagination!
Me, too.
Wow! Very British style detective story. Very professional, full of details and never boring. So nice to hear when British people pronounce correctly Italian names.
At the end, Mr Hopkins looks to be almost relieved by learning that the painting is not that highly valuable. So, he can keep it within his family as a heirloom dear to his heart.
i like fiona bruce a lot, i really respect an English woman who keeps her boots on in bed
This result is obviously so satisfying for the owner. He gets to keep and enjoy a painting he truly loves without the burden of family members bugging him to sell it because it is disgustingly valuable. He certainly looked ‘tickled pink’ at the result to me. 🎉🎉❤
He was remarkably gracious about accepting the result. British upper-class manners, something I admire.
So, what Englishman painted this beautiful painting? I would love to know this bit of information .
Jings I’m sure if it was worth 10m he’d have had no problem selling and taking his share. The irony that the ancestors bought it as one thing then tried to present it as another then generations later get caught up exposing an even bigger fraud is not lost. If he’d not got Fake or Fortune in he could have possibly flogged it for 1/2m. Greed ruins everything.
An anonymous forger working in London before 1808, clearly. I wish they had carbon-dated the wax on the Florence seal. Then we would’ve found if it was English wax or Tuscan wax that was used, as well as the year it was produced.
This is the one and only show that never disappoints, regardless of the outcome of the painting.
Well put.
Beyond grateful that a show like this exists.
😍
Nick seems like a down to earth guy who's enjoying the ride and really enjoyed it. The experience enriches the painting.
I like that this expert is willing to give his opinion directly and answer questions.
New favourite show to binge on. Fantastic presenters.
It is good that the history has been clarified. It is still a beautiful painting with a fascinating story, I am amazed that someone with so much talent was making these views like postcards. It is still a treasure!
I want to know who painted it, I'm sure they could find out as he was very good.
Some fakers have enormous talent!!!
Because its not the painting that fetches the money its the name. The painting is every bit excellent but one name would make it into millions and another into few thousands.
I can’t understand why someone wouldn’t sign their paintings.
Copy and fake are not synonymous. In fact, it was quite common in past centuries for works to be copied by other artists. The painter never signed it as Marieschi, someone assumed it was one.
I’m not an art person, but I really enjoy this show. It’s also educating me on art, so I appreciate the mystery and the art lesson. Thanks.
I JUST LOVE THIS SHOW, thanks for posting, thanks for making it for so long. What a beautiful painting and what amazing artists the 2 front runners are. Only 12mins in so outcome unknown and going from history could be a fake or fortune. But it’s a wonderful piece no matter what.
These programs are so addictive! Thank you!
Oh that is a beautiful painting! I'm so glad he doesn't feel obligated to sell it, it's gorgeous.
This series is like Agatha Christy’s mystery of the art world, except no murders, except of the art owners dreams. 😉
Very good episode. All the twists and turns. Our loving ancestors were human
This series has become my new favourite mystery series. It helps that I have stood on the sidewalk across from this site and so remember it well! A thing of Beauty often has no price!
Thanks for posting this episode …one I haven’t seen before … keep it up 😁
Yes PLEASE keep it up !!!
Great show! I do miss Dr. Bendor very much!
Me too!!!
Great episode, though IDK about the final conclusion about it being a British artist. The reasoning seemed somewhat implausible. To assume that someone would go to the lengths of faking a little known detail of a magisterial stamp of FLORENCE (note not Venice) on what was supposed to be a common souvenir knock off, not a major artist, just seems unlikely. You would assume that IF they could fake little details like the seal so well, then whoever painted that painting would know enough to get not only the methods but Venice right.
Second, artist of that period who did "views" often took artistic liberties (I think we were even shown some), changing buildings' proportions slightly or their positions to get a nicer composition. Some painters were more faithful to reality, and some were more willing to be a bit "creative" with some details, but only to the degree that it still remained utterly recognizable as a whole. However, taking artistic license can mean that once in while that which is painted, while visually lovely, no longer makes complete architectural sense. As to the canvas, the artist could be reusing an old canvas of better weave, scraped clean, which may account for the unusual paint layers.
So, IDK, but I would not want to disregard that seal, and on such flimsy evidence assume that the painting was British. By all indications it was painted by some unknown Italian artist, probably of the school of Marieschi, who might have lived in Venice for a time, but later returned/moved to Florence. The painting could even have been painted at a later date in the artist's life, when they were painting the scene more from memory and habit.
Re your first point, it wouldn't have had to be the original artist who put the seal on - someone who wanted to sell it later could have done it. They might have known it wasn't a genuine painting by Marieschi, and tried to redirect attention based on an Italian place name. That it was Firenze instead of Venezia might not be such a big deal because the seal was for a court in Firenze that dealt with the possessions of bankrupt families - it wasn't the seal of an original seller. I'm not sure if the purview of a Florence court would extend to Venice, but there's also probably less of a chance that someone who'd bought a painting OF Venice would be living IN Venice. Though it's always possible the painting was by an English person who sold it to an English person who then went abroad to live in Florence, or something of that kind.
A lame pun about this painting just came to my mind: the painting is Marie-ESQUE.
@@SchlichteToven The problem is the timing, assuming the seal is genuine. The painting is undoubtedly done in the Marieschi style, so either has to be by someone who worked with him or someone trying to copy him. Marieschi had a rather short but very productive life until 1744, where he worked with a host of other artists to produce his scenes of Venice. Some of them could easily have kept going after his death. Or some other local artist could be copying his work for sale. But it has to end up in Florence in a bankruptcy court before 1808. That's at most 60 years. That's not really enough time to assume it went abroad and back again without some paper trail indicating the fact. So more logical to assume that the painting was either painted in Venice and bought by someone who lived in Florence, or painted in Florence and sold there- sometime in 1750-60, and later to go into a bankruptcy auction at the end of the 1700s.
As usual, another very good show. Thanks. I enjoyed every moment.
I mean, after all is said and done, it IS a beautiful painting!
Sometimes, when it's beautiful, it not being expensive is a blessing. There was an episode where they needed to sell the painting because they had lost their father, but the painting was so at home in their house, it was a shame.
Ha, did some genealogy and it turned out the stories (which I only half believed) were true. Family histories can be surprising...
Definitely!
We´re not experts, just art lovers, but to us it was obvious from the first look that this painting was not a ´masterpiece.´ Our disagreement with the original opinions made it all the more exciting to watch. This is an excellent show and the presenters are perfect in this role.
I don't know if Phillip chooses the paintings, but whoever does so is a master themselves. Subjects are fascinating from every point of view.
I totally agree with you Chris Reynolds. At first glance l felt that the scene lacked real perspective. That the basilique came too far forward, and lacked the subtle mystery that one finds in, for example, Canaletto’s work, where the sense of space is immense. ( Just one aspect of what l felt upon seeing the painting for the first time) . This may sound arrogant, sorry. Although l am a ( pro.) painter , l cannot pretend to be an expert either. I know a lot about technique, but usually go by gut feeling. Nevertheless, l recognise that whoever painted this work, was a fairly accomplished technicien!
@@lisap9936 I really appreciate your assessment of the work too. It´s lovely to read a response from someone who is an art lover too. Especially of the Renaissance period. Our favourite Venetian artists is Canaletto. We were lucky to spend two holidays of two weeks just in Venice. It was impossible to take in all the culture, famous works of art and ancient architecture in one fortnight. Each day, after 3 or 4 hours we had to come away and slum it in the towns an on beaches because we went into cultural burnout! We did the Doge´s palace in 4 separate visits!
I would love to hear your views on the Mona Lisa. I still maintain that this was NOT painted by Da Vinci but by a much loved student perhaps. Hence it being found on his bedroom wall after his death.
Also have you seen the Gent Altar Piece? Breathtaking.
Totally agree the composition on initial view was not refined, great work but not refined
Great channel. Keep it up
What a wonderful episode! Engineering! Chemistry! Art History! Political complications! A grand mystery! Unless you knew better, you might well wonder how an art history episode could be so captivating. But captivating it is. Thank you so much for making this interesting material available to us. I love it.
Very interesting painting, history and the research in this documentary. Thank you for sharing
A good one again. Thanks so much.
I highly appreciate the professional and very well done work of the production team. Very skilled video-photography with high end cameras and lens equipment,, and wonderful crips and clean audio-recordings. I wonder what kind of microphones and technique they used? The post editing and music chosen supplements the dramatic and faschinating story and history of this beautiful and creative 1700s painting- It¨s a pure pleasure to listen to Fiona Bruce and Philip Mould, who express themselves in a expressive and sophisticated language. Thank you for this captivating episode. Kind regards from Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael this show was made by the BBC which is why the production quality is so high
I absolutely love this show! I am hooked on it like a fine piece of art hanging on a wall. I binge watch this show.
I wouldn't be so certain this was British. It could certainly have been created in Florence by an artist unfamiliar with Venetian architecture; that could account for the discrepancies the expert notes, and would not require the outlandish theory that the red stamp was some kind of effort to forge an Italian identity.
Good idea
But the canvas under the microscope? ("More like English canvases in structure. Looser weave.") And then, the paint? I know that I was thinking "So what?" But then, schools dictate certain orders for colours. (One learnt methods and stuck to them).
Such a truly enjoyable mystery. Love these FAKE OR FORTUNE videos. Luv em.
What a gracious man Nick is. One can only wish him many more years of enjoying his painting and that whoever looks after it after him will enjoy it as much and have as many happy memories.
Right? He was so horrified discovering that the family lore wasnt true I felt really bad for him. He seems like a sweet man
When I was taught Venetian painting technique at University we were taught to put a layer of vermillion red over the gesso layer (white). Some things make you go hummm...
I am so excited about these art exploration shows. I have learned a lot
Intriguing story filled with many twists and turns. Fun adventure and the painting is beautiful. 🌞
The best painting owner i ever seen. Hugs from Brazil !
As a fan of Canaletto, Bellotto and especially Guardi, I enjoyed this so much. It's so carefully done and conducted, and that Nick is a real gentleman. I am sorry it wasn't a Marieschi, but it's still a lovely picture.
That new camera-technique is fanTAStic!
Look at the bright side. Now his brother won't ask him to sell it.
EXACTLY!
This episode had me on the edge of my seat!
Always delightful! Thank you
Very Instructive, Bravo !
Absolutely brilliant!! Thank you!!
Whomever painted it did a beautiful job except for the building mistaken for two and the italian wax seal . I feel this was a reproduction for the tourist trade done by an accomplished artist to rival Marieschi's version for less money . There are many instances all over the world of artist and craftsman creating similar products exclusively for tourists because of the bigger net and easier sale . The color foundation is also similar albeit out of order but shows how the unknown artist wanted the ground layers to resemble Marieschi's . However you analyze it, the technique of a vanishing point reflects on Brunelleschi"s Baptistery painting c 1420.
The cupola is wrong too. Currently it looks like it's zinc, not something you get in the UK and therefore something a Brit wouldn't understand (I had a friend staying and I lived on the top floor in Paris, and he looked out and said "What's that grey stuff? It was just the roofs opposite...). It looks like the guy was used to Wren buildings, the scene could be London with water.
Yeah, might want to check granddad's desk drawer for that wax seal stamp.
Probably the best art show on the planet!
The wax mark gets us back to 1808, forging that would be extremely difficult. But alot of paintings were made for tourists, I find it hard to believe to do them in time you'd use vermilion underneath, it slows the construction time. Also the dark quality of the building lowers acceptance of potential buyers. Still alot of questions!
One of the more intriguing episodes.
I love your fake or fortune videos. How l wish there were more! But it seems the series stopped a while ago. Or has it???
Nick gets to keep his painting. How marvelous. I too, think it's beautiful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If it's beautiful (to you) then it's valuable.
Exciting like a thriller 😃👍
The owner of the painting took the news extremely well.
I agree with many others that Mr Hopkins was in several ways relieved by the result and that it throws light on his family as well as the painting - by Major Gubbins? What a terrific piece of investigation by our two principal sleuths as well as the technical wizards and what a valuable piece of provenience to go with the picture. He should stick a
Vintage Cannelloni label on the frame.
This just exposes the silliness of art pricing. “We love the picture but it is worth 20 times as much depending on which we’ll-known artist created it”. The picture doesn’t change. It is so shallow, not about the quality of the art AT ALL. Blaargh.
I’ve always hated that. Just because an artist got lucky enough to get noticed (or maybe get a rich patron) all their works, no matter how good or bad they are, are worth 100x-1000x the value of a superior artist’s who never got his/her lucky break.
But then I’m not an art snob…as they say “I just know what I like”😜
" If anything it is more Beautiful Now, than it was' said Nick Hopkins. Very special way of putting the Blow he just received, but oh so Wise and Resilient!
Fascinating show!Mystery...love it!
Thoroughly interesting. Thank you.
Really enjoyed this episode.
Who would fake an unknown at the time artist? It makes no sense at all. I think this is a genuine Marieschi who made a bunch of identical paintings because they were selling well.
But they WERE known. That was the problem. They were the rock stars of their time. (Think Coco Chanel, Yves Saint Laurent, Tom Ford, etc. and knockoffs).
The appalled expression on the face of the marble bust behind the authority on Marieschi in the last minutes of the programme is priceless....
I am so hooked on this show!
Just love this show. Even love the repeats
I think you missed a clue. Why does an English painting appear in the archives of a Florence probate magisterium sometime before 1808? A search of the archives for a deceased Brit might be fruitful. It's also intriguing to think about a young British artist painting it during his Grand Tour. Perhaps he went on to be famous in England?
Love this show and all your previous one.
39:10 It's never said that the painting does appear in the archives of Florence. An example is given, but we're told it would take years to conduct such a search. 4:37 The red seal appears on a bracing board of the frame, not on the canvas itself. Perhaps a re-used bit of wood or frame (honest explanation) or an attempt at forgery?
It never said it was in Florence archived. They didn’t search it. But I wish they discussed more on possibility of forging the stamp. Is that something common or easy to do, and compare the stamps’s fonts with other genuine stamps.
The basilica of Santa Maria della Salute Is not by Vincenzo Scamozzi, how it is said, but by the most important Venetian baroque architect, Baldassarre Longhena.
Upon further examination of this episode, I believe this painting should be attributed to Marieschi because of the following features : identical canvas size , identical vanishing point , identical angle pov , identical placement of figures in foreground, identical sizing of buildings . Look at the side by side screen shot @23:27. They are identical except for color and figure placement . Marieschi could have had apprentices do some work creating slight variations in iteration .
I love this show.
Another very intriguing episode! Overall, I can understand why the experts are saying an imitator of Venetian views created this painting. It’s seems obvious that at some point the owner of the painting lived in Florence, hence the wax stamp. Apparently the paint structure layering and the canvas weave are factors too important to just “brush” off. However, the person figures in this painting do seem to resemble Marieschi’s style. Who knew Guardi’s works are valued so highly? Not me.
I would never get to see this show if it wasn't on you tube, thank you so much from someone who watches very little television because most of it is not fit for human consumption.
It was so thoughtful for all of these historic painters to create jobs for art lovers in the 21st century. 😅
it is a lovely painting and not the result 'hoped for' but they still get it far back with quite a story and an interesting story thats not a 100% figured out but almost more intriguing because its more mysterious
Love this show, so exciting
I love how the x-ray gun actually looks like a x-ray gun. No need saying that I want one. Fabolous Show btw.!
I like that judge,straight up.
Great episode.
That Florentine seal should be investigate further, IMO. Are there other suspect versions of this type of wax seal around the place?
Finally, I'm always intrigued by the uniquely British slant of, "What's it worth?" Whatever the Brits may think about the aesthetics of something, it always seems to get trumped by the mighty GBP!
So the good news is, the painting wont need to be sold and can remain in the family. And one can enjoy it as one had enjoyed it before
This was the best of the series, so far. For me the family history is more important than who painted it.
I guess it happens in all families that two stories get mixed up to appear as one 🤔😊💐
At 41:23. Now time to carbon-date the wax of the Florence seal for traces of carbon-14. That’ll give you a nice, precise year in which the wax was produced, so a ballpark figure of when the painting was sold in the Florentine auction. It could go back further than 1808.
I'm hook, watched it once and now I can't stop. I don't know what it is about it that captivate me so much.
J'imagine que c'est sain, intelligent, captivant, intriguant et up lifting.
Hmm. The imitator's version is more appealing than The Real Thing: the Fitzwilliiam painting less charming and rigid compared with Nick's painting. I think other applications of vermillion by Marieschi should have been examined. At any rate..the .art world is rather nutty.
@Emma Hardesty It is a little nutty - but I love it! :D and I have to agree, I prefer Nick’s copy to the original Marieschi 🤷🏻♀️👍🏻
So, Meyer spielman purchased the painting to mark the 25th wedding anniversary. Nick is loosey goosey with dates, but does mention 1882 in re the wedding. 1882 - 1907 = 25.
It's stilla beautifull painting to have in the family
The Italian seal is confirmation of it being SOLD in Italy as part of a property sale as the expert told them. It's very likely the British painter found a way of selling the painting in Italy to an unsuspecting buyer initially.
So sad! I thought it was the real thing!!! Well it still looks amazing!
Its a shame that, had it not been for desire to sell it, the painting would have been viewed as a priceless masterpiece for many more generations in Nick's family.
Now it's looked at as an attractive copy/forgery, and Nick sees his grandfather with new and more cynical eyes. Sometimes things are better left untouched.
Curiosity Killed The Cat.....
Not necessarily, the story could have been Major Gubbins', and the Grandfather paid top dollar, so he believed it.
@Songbirdstress The grandfather told the family that he bought the painting while touring Venice. He lied.
Do you believe fiction and misinformation are more important than the truth?
@@AFAskygoddess We don't know that; we only know it was a family story. We don't know how it originated or who originated it.
49:35 how he tries to expand the picture. lol
But in the end, look at what an amazing story this painting now has.
La Salute was designed and built by Baldassare Longhena not Scamozzi.
You got to give it to the Brits, they are the best television makers in the world
along with much-vaunted OTT ceremonial...😁
The.supposedly forged stamp does not make sense. One would expect Venetian, not Florentine stamp. Another thing: isn't it weird that Christies' sell forgeries and that the National Gallery exhibited it as Marieschi?
Try Googling "Christies" and "forgery". You may find the results interesting.
It is weird! Also found it strange that the (brother)Jacomo Marieschi name was quickly brushed aside as a mistake! Rather a big mistake to make imo.
love this show!:::)
Very enjoyable episode. I can fully understand the final evaluation and the facts supporting that it was painted by a non-Venetian, but somehow the inference that the wax stamp is therefore a false "made in Italy" insignia does not convince. Wouldn't they have falsified a Venetian provenance? Couldn't here be some explanation for the painting coming through the Florentine probate court?
The travel postcards were a bit on the large hefty side in those days. Photographic postcards undermined the copy studios in Venice and left them colourising photographs of the landscapes and buildings. A lot cheaper to lug home.
I thought the wax seal was the seal of a magistrate; perhaps the painter took it to Venice and bribed a magistrate to stamp it? Was the entire stamp forged? How did they match the exact texture and color of the wax? I have questions.
that would be material for what the Italians call 'un giallo' and very exciting...!
I like this programme so much that i get absurdly annoyed at her and Phillip for not churning them out. I never studied history much and it's like i hold them personally responsible for not giving me my next lesson and amazement.
Fantastica serie
Isnt it odd that they never mentioned that Canaletto worked in England for a time?
Great film
Is this work a reference to the first Renaissance piece to use perspective by Fillipo Brunelleschi?
Because I remember reading about it in art history class, and finding out it was lost media. Honestly, it's a shame to find out, but at least the concepts were preserved by others