Aquila 36 Sport Power Catamaran (2021) - Test Video by BoatTEST.com

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 154

  • @chuckm.5032
    @chuckm.5032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    starting at $439,000

  • @duncanjames914
    @duncanjames914 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This was an excellent boat review. The comparison with foil/no-foil was amazing. Foil for me! Your reviews are at an excellent pace and highlight both features and things that should be improved upon. It's nice to see the unbiased approach. Well done Capt. Steve. Time to go shopping for an Aquila 36.

  • @constantineding8700
    @constantineding8700 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Wow. What a practical boat! Every inch of the boat was utilized well.

  • @DonFarmer-hq5sw
    @DonFarmer-hq5sw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I can only imagine the performance of this cat with the Hydrofoil and a pair of Sharrow props 😮❤❤

  • @CranioUomo
    @CranioUomo ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow, the foils serious offer some hydrodynamic efficiency. Really unique design!

  • @taylor5542
    @taylor5542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love it.... do you take kidneys for down payment. I'll keep my eyes open for a used one in a couple years. My wife would shit a twinkie.

  • @Captain_DeSync
    @Captain_DeSync 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That boat looks so stable. You can just see how flat, level, and how little it moves.

  • @DA-qe9py
    @DA-qe9py 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another great review by Captain Steve of a great boat. Really like the hydrofoil option! Also like the massive amount of glass. Although, I'd be critical of all the white surfaces that will cause visibility reducing glare. :-( Better to make them dark gray.

  • @nickyl9040
    @nickyl9040 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Here on the shallow waters of the Gulf Coast of Florida , those hydrofoils would quickly become a crap trap

  • @FREAKIN_BRYAN
    @FREAKIN_BRYAN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    We have a normal 36 and there is a 36 foil owner nearby has been having structural problems with the foil on theirs that kept it out of service from time to time. The folks at marine max said the same thing. Amazing performance increase though minus the issues.

    • @socomon69
      @socomon69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's kind of a big deal.

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Can't be. He didn't mention any negatives or possible negatives.
      One tell was he said it wasn't available with the 400's. That implies structural issues.

    • @thomastirolflorida5363
      @thomastirolflorida5363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      plus you have 8 more inches of draft....

    • @tatemethvin2503
      @tatemethvin2503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice

  • @robertmacdonald7216
    @robertmacdonald7216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Watched with interest the fuel savings were great but not always wanting to go full blast across the water, how does it preform say just enjoying the day at say 8 knots? Does the fuel consumption rise with more drag?

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      100%. The gains are from being at speed, raising the while kaboodle out of the water. Rt at plane and slower there would be a lot of drag. Heck, if you saw off 5 inches of the skeg mpg goes way up. Can't turn all that well but life is full of trade offs

  • @adriancarter4302
    @adriancarter4302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Was looking for a boat/ yacht but I think I've just found my boat thanks to you.

  • @nexusoldbind5015
    @nexusoldbind5015 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would like to see those stats again but with a sharrow prop installed on the engines to see how much more it can be improved if any ?

  • @blewyd
    @blewyd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    There are so many benefits to this boat. Definitely will see more hydrofoils in the future with the added efficiency.

    • @Ballista762
      @Ballista762 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But this hydrofoil is less efficient

    • @kirkland5674
      @kirkland5674 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ballista762 No, it is more efficient, higher burn per hour, but going faster.

  • @karatejoe5049
    @karatejoe5049 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I thought it would look a lot more out of the water with hydro foils. If you can make them removable you'll REALLY have something.

  • @Idahodeerslayer
    @Idahodeerslayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love all your videos but you lost me at: two mercury motors. JUNK !

  • @victorvandyke9898
    @victorvandyke9898 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Why should the price always be such a secret? Why can you just say "Boat starts at $200,000 and up"! Makes me want to unsubscribe!

    • @PlanBMarketing
      @PlanBMarketing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      600k plus.

    • @henrycagle7827
      @henrycagle7827 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      700k with soft top. Hard top a little extra 800k

    • @logicreversed18t
      @logicreversed18t 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I agree that it's VERY frustrating the best boat reviewer on TH-cam fails to include one of the MOST important details.
      That being said, you can usually find the info on line with a quick google search.

    • @henryxavier3751
      @henryxavier3751 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@logicreversed18t google search is not always right.... depends on allot of things, have you asked google how much a girl per hour would cost on that boat? What extras would she have or could deliver? May(e google knows that too?

    • @logicreversed18t
      @logicreversed18t 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@henryxavier3751 A girl per hour? Grow up.
      Google will absolutely help someone get an idea what a boat like this costs. It's really not that hard. Also, if you're an ACTUAL potential buyer, go to your local Aquila dealer and find out - that's what I did.

  • @markjessurun7765
    @markjessurun7765 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very Nice and Roomy boat Cap, 2 B Sleeping 2×2 Persons and having double heads !! Good layout and on top of that Good Performance 2 and Range considering the Speed!! I appreciate ur Test and Thanks a lot Captain !!

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching!!

  • @wrzl1675
    @wrzl1675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With optimum cruise at only 700 RPM below wide open throttle means they propped the boat for a top end speed so in reality that foil probably doesn’t much of anything when comparing apples to apples.

  • @autonomous_collective
    @autonomous_collective 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Need to do a test with Suzuki Df 350 and 300. The duo prop motors would be ideal for this boat.

  • @daivietnguyen7289
    @daivietnguyen7289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️🥰🥰🥰

  • @arkadandfortuna1582
    @arkadandfortuna1582 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow I’m actually fairly impressed, and wasn’t expecting it.

  • @rickbourne1376
    @rickbourne1376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an amazing boat to have if you live in FL on the inner coastal. This is perfect day or weekend boat IMHO, and I've been reviewing a lot of them.

  • @jeffbaril548
    @jeffbaril548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why can't you go the hydrofoil with the more powerful engines?

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      with larger engines the foil will create too much lift and induce porpoising. The foil is designed up to a maximum speed and the 300’s puts the boat and foil within acceptable tolerances of maximizing lift and efficiency. Going up in engine size to 400’s will push the limit to the edge and actually wants to make the boat start lifting up too high so the foil will lift and then pop out of the water and back in the water and repeat.
      - Capt Steve

  • @richard9436
    @richard9436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm a big fan of the foil assist, like the layout just not ever going to buy a "Made in China" boat. My family deserves better quality on the open ocean.

  • @savagecub
    @savagecub 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    46 GPH !!!………My airplane goes 200kts and burns12GPH.

    • @Bakanokotosuruna666
      @Bakanokotosuruna666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My truck is about 9 mpg!
      We should all fly! Hahahahahaha
      You are too funny!

    • @econrey
      @econrey 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome to boats

  • @brentfriedland
    @brentfriedland ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It gets the 400 Salt Water Verardos now.

  • @uowebfoot
    @uowebfoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Time to put on Verado v12s

    • @pistonburner6448
      @pistonburner6448 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      According to the chart that will mean 1.2 knots higher speed and 100x consumption... 🤣

  • @NanoXG
    @NanoXG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1.3 mpg? 😂 does it come with paddles?

  • @makaipowercats
    @makaipowercats 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great boat test!

  • @srupp9271
    @srupp9271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sooner or later all of us will run aground. Imagine that with the foils.

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's why these are a gimmick.
      And can't even imagine just the general structural issues with the pounding they would take

    • @darthkek1953
      @darthkek1953 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      (1) not everyone crashes into land, really and (2) its still beachable with the foils.

  • @bobbyndallas
    @bobbyndallas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This test is only for a paid endorsement. It shows the best case of a few things, but omits everything else. I won't use boattest in my decision making when I get a new boat.

  • @malekodesouza7255
    @malekodesouza7255 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeezus. 23 gph at cruise speed?😳. WTH can afford that?!

  • @patriot-wf1er
    @patriot-wf1er ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can it be delivered inland to iowa

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  ปีที่แล้ว

      Please contact the closet dealer here: boattest.com/boats/aquila/36-sport-power-catamaran-2021

  • @ThruAWiderLens
    @ThruAWiderLens 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the boat but am thinking the foils would be a significant hazard for the manatees here in Florida.

  • @markpitchford7375
    @markpitchford7375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1.3mpg at 38mph???? Wow.

  • @matthewsmcdill
    @matthewsmcdill 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Am I crazy or was there zero mention of 400s with foils? Is there an increase in speed over the 300 with foils, and an efficiency boost compared to the 400s without foils?

    • @obmed11
      @obmed11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hints of structural issues with more power. He says the foils are only available with the 300s. That tells you everything. Wonderful idea not so wonderful execution.

    • @markpitchford7375
      @markpitchford7375 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@obmed11 or balance.

    • @dethray1000
      @dethray1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      if you put 350hp counter rotates on it i bet that would beat all,no hydro foils needed

  • @gerhardvanwaltsleben8944
    @gerhardvanwaltsleben8944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lekker man lekker

  • @joerob00
    @joerob00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    would you be able to beach it on a sand bar with the hydrofoil?

  • @miked7745
    @miked7745 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How strong is this hydrofoil? accidents happen, so what happens with u hit a lobster/crab pot buoy at half or full speed.

  • @alwaysinsideout
    @alwaysinsideout ปีที่แล้ว

    Boats need to start using auto gears, because the miles per gallon on boats these days is not good enough. 0.9 per gallon?

  • @robinfarman
    @robinfarman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So very tempting

  • @njrivetelite
    @njrivetelite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this boat

  • @patriciawong4816
    @patriciawong4816 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this come with enclosed helm with air conditioning?

    • @glenn65
      @glenn65 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes , it is an option.

  • @Bubbles99718
    @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So, zero negatives with the foils. He didn't mention any so they must not exist

    • @viasevenvai
      @viasevenvai 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s V shape also allows a gentle settling back down instead of dropping. Price would be a negative as it’s an option.

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@viasevenvai Being ripped out of the transom would be a negative as well. Which most likely happens alot

    • @viasevenvai
      @viasevenvai 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bubbles99718 the props are lower.

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@viasevenvai meaning what?

    • @viasevenvai
      @viasevenvai 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bubbles99718 the props will hit before

  • @max7331jf
    @max7331jf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great descriptive video again... my wife and I added this boat to the list we are considering. Just wish there was an electric motor/solar package available

    • @battlehymn6389
      @battlehymn6389 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you could probably get electric ... this boat is designed for outboards though and the largest electric outboards I am aware of equate to about 50HP. Putting two 50HP motors in place of two 300's comes with an obvious decrease in performance, and while the motors themselves are inexpensive the battery bank you will need is not. You'd also be wise to add a generator for cloudy days. The initial coast of going electric will be much higher, how long it takes to recoop that cost really depends on how much boating you do. One thing that many of the companies selling electrics try to say is "no maintenance" this is patently false, do not believe it.

    • @JeepCherokeeful
      @JeepCherokeeful 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just use the wind, like sailors did for thousands of years.

  • @curtishorn1267
    @curtishorn1267 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Has anyone used this with Sharrow props? Just curious.

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Impressive mini yacht.

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Huge cockpit!!!

  • @112chapters3
    @112chapters3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    On one of these nearly errrday, time will tell, but so far there are some things that could be designed to a better standard…. I think I’m in a very early one. Still a great boat so far….but I doubt it will hold out with a long life span as the 2004 420 and 2006 40ft sea rays I gig on.

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Captain Steve does the best boat tests.

  • @mikeyshanghai9801
    @mikeyshanghai9801 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and nice boat. What’s the price range?

  • @FishOnIsMyHandle
    @FishOnIsMyHandle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love that boat BUT if that bow wants to go a little faster than the stern,
    I'll keep looking.

    • @gbsailing9436
      @gbsailing9436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only when going sideways...How fast did you need to go sideways? Just take it easy on the throttle

  • @king_snipes2423
    @king_snipes2423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Test the hobie adventure island

  • @abdulharisbinhunusyunus9672
    @abdulharisbinhunusyunus9672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow Nice boat

  • @katprowler6805
    @katprowler6805 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why can't you add foils in the 400s?

  • @cdrom7792
    @cdrom7792 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Liked the video. But why do you compare the speed with the consumption of fuel in Gal/Hr? If you drive with faster speeds you obviously get more miles per hour. Which means you shouldn't compare the Gal/Hr but the miles per gallon or am I wrong? In your comparison it looks like the fuel consumption is better without the foils, when in realty you get 1.257 miles per galllon with the foils and only 0.987 miles per gallon without the foils while also going with more speed.
    Sry for the bad language btw. Not my mothertongue so might have misunderstood you.

    • @owenwilsey7896
      @owenwilsey7896 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gallons per hour is the standard for fuel consumption in the marine world.

    • @cdrom7792
      @cdrom7792 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@owenwilsey7896 that still does not realy solve the problem of the comparison with different speed but good to know. Thx. Don't really know much about the boat world, just like to watch the videos about it and didn't realy understand, what information i should get by comparing the fuelconsumption in gallos per hour while going different speed.

    • @Cybawalla
      @Cybawalla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You make a valid point, in my opinion. It seems that the two key comparison factors at a given rpm (between foiled and non-foiled hulls) are speed and fuel consumption. Gal/hr would be valid for displacement hulls, but for planing hulls, it would seem that fuel burned per unit of distance covered, would be more relevant for comparison. For instance knots for speed and gallons per nautical mile for fuel efficiency. If I re-crunched the numbers based on that, then at WOT (5700 rpm) foils are 16.66% faster (38.3 knots vs 32.8) and fuel efficiency on foils is 11.25% better (1.25 gal/nm vs 1.41). Based on 4500 rpm, foils are 38.4% faster (27.5 knots vs 19.9) and fuel burn with foils is 22.02% more efficient (0.92 gal/nm vs 1.18).
      Which means that, foils make sense on the basis of the performance data. But of course, that is only part of the equation. Additional costs have to be factored in, as do issues such as longer term impact hull integrity (given that this is an add-on to the original design by the hull naval architects). And lifestyle/use of the boat owner....e.g coastal cruising and sand-bank partying vs moderate distance passage making at speed.

  • @romanmaimo1468
    @romanmaimo1468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice boat

  • @Ricardo-gv1zq
    @Ricardo-gv1zq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder how the foil would handle a sand bank

    • @PinnyBasher
      @PinnyBasher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The props are lower in the water than the hydrofoil so they should be the main concern.

    • @chrisjkim
      @chrisjkim 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PinnyBasher Apparently the hydrofoil can take the weight of the boat so it is possible to beach the boat even with the hydrofoil. Probably has to be done very gently...

  • @CC-wg8gs
    @CC-wg8gs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why don´t you use knots instead of mph? Great channel otherwise :)

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nitpicking.
      Here's mine: beverage receptical and trash receptical. How bout cupholder and trashcan.

    • @remyr5749
      @remyr5749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably trying to appeal to the 1st time boat buyer/owner.

  • @kennorth4336
    @kennorth4336 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What prop was being used in the test?

  • @spanishjo4282
    @spanishjo4282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    World best boat review in the World!

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! : )

  • @geckobrah4201
    @geckobrah4201 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice boat, handleable size. Does the head have a shower?

  • @user-ci4dg7xg3d
    @user-ci4dg7xg3d ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not mark the price on the video?

    • @BoatTEST
      @BoatTEST  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry we don't because every dealer has difference prices and different options. You can find out the price here by contacting yoru closest dealer. ;) boattest.com/boats/aquila/36-sport-power-catamaran-2021

  • @kevinz8930
    @kevinz8930 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent with the hydrofoils

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Smooth ride!!

  • @mariorodriguez2299
    @mariorodriguez2299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s a option w/skyhook ???

  • @John-tz3ii
    @John-tz3ii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent review although I would love to have seen how this handles offshore swells. Would Haulover eat it up ? The open bow/lower freeboard seems a little susceptible to green water. Also curious about the affect of the foils on lower speed fuel consumption. Does the additional drag result in lower economy?

    • @llamawizard
      @llamawizard 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Catamarans run haulover better than any monohulls.

    • @John-tz3ii
      @John-tz3ii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@llamawizard Fishing catamarans with high freeboard forward do well. This model looks to have much less buoyancy forward and a relatively low freeboard across the bow that act like a scoop if pushed too hard, as seen on numerous channels.

  • @Mr91495osh
    @Mr91495osh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cabin ? Head ?

  • @bwalker4194
    @bwalker4194 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why in the world would anyone buy one of these without foils?

    • @justrob4586
      @justrob4586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thought the same thing at first, but looking into it they increase draft the boat’s overall draft, risk of damage from running aground, damage from hitting debris, general concerns about their long term structural integrity, lower fuel efficiency at lower speed. They seem to be only great while running high speeds

    • @richard9436
      @richard9436 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      $20k+ buys a lot of fuel

  • @CarlosMedina-gq5eu
    @CarlosMedina-gq5eu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍🇵🇷🇵🇷🤗🤗🎣🤣

  • @РостиславБезруков-и8й
    @РостиславБезруков-и8й 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    И сколько стоит такая красота?

  • @nicksimeone
    @nicksimeone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is there A/C?

  • @J_Razz
    @J_Razz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    generator?

  • @josemotta4832
    @josemotta4832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you put this boat with the foil on a trailer ?

    • @markpitchford7375
      @markpitchford7375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's like 16' wide.

    • @josemotta4832
      @josemotta4832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@markpitchford7375 I am not thinking to take it to the open road. Just from our my hangar with a tractor, to the ramp here at the pacific entrance of the Panama Canal at Diablo Spinnig Club.

  • @Ballista762
    @Ballista762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please explain why it gets worse fuel economy with the addition of the hydrofoil. I figure less of the boat is in the water so there should be less resistance.

    • @EricGlenSnyder
      @EricGlenSnyder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Going faster which causes props to drag more or cavitate less is all I can think of.

    • @EricGlenSnyder
      @EricGlenSnyder 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thought about it more and wonder if in reality RPMs were slightly higher with foil.

    • @Ballista762
      @Ballista762 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EricGlenSnyder Yea could be

    • @vidotepp
      @vidotepp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      At the speeds the foils lift more of the hull out of the water, the fuel efficiency goes up because the foils in the water have less resistance than the part of the hull lifted out of the water. You also get higher speeds at the same throttle setting for the same reasons. At lower speeds, more of the hull in the water plus the foils is more resistance than the hulls alone, so at lower speeds you get a loss of performance. It's a tradeoff, but worth it up to a point.

  • @jcappstore12345
    @jcappstore12345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No out of sun ventilation? Not a south florida boat

    • @blewyd
      @blewyd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Go to 8:40 and watch to 8:59.

  • @gaycha6589
    @gaycha6589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Horrible looking lump of white plastic. But great use of space and interior design. Needs teak decks at least to soften design.

    • @hautehussey
      @hautehussey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. The exterior looks are definitely the downside of this boat.

  • @dr.bentonquest1151
    @dr.bentonquest1151 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you use a boat lift on this with the hydrofoil?

  • @clobbyhops
    @clobbyhops ปีที่แล้ว

    I have looked at every video on TH-cam featuring this oat and not one person spoke or showed storage areas in the staterooms, there’s two drawers beneath each berth: how deep are they? Are they regular size or are they the length of the berth, two doors in the head are these storage or utility? Would have been nice to have shown this.

  • @Mike-ccu
    @Mike-ccu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very professionally done !

  • @Andrewlikesguns
    @Andrewlikesguns 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks easy enough to operate.