Concept 11.0 Receiver from Pacific Stereo their in-house brand competing against Pioneer, Sony, etc.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @Silverfaces.
    @Silverfaces. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    From what I could find Pacific liked to bundle the Concept receivers with speakers and a turntable to give the customer a ready to use set. I found an ad from the June 22, 1977 LA Times. Pacific offered the Concept 11 with a set of Infinity Quantum 4 Speakers, and a Sony PS-3300 turntable fitted with a Stanton 680EE. List price for the set was $1299.00.

  • @passqualecaiazza7728
    @passqualecaiazza7728 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I loved Pacific Stereo. Do not remember Concept brand, but I bought my 2nd Dual turntable there. I still have both and I still use them. Our store was in Fresno, CA.

  • @watdanuqta-mf5ms
    @watdanuqta-mf5ms 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember Pacific Stereo from the seventies that was up the street from Music Craft, Playback Stereo two doors down(the Licht paint store still there in between), and directly across the street from Playback, Midwest Hifi. All of them in Oak Park, IL, within a mile of my home. There were quite a few stores in Chicagoland and some of the best people in audio here got their start. The seventies was the heyday of the audio system explosion and everyone I knew in high school and I mean all of my friends owned real stereo systems back then. I always get a chuckle from some TH-camr reviewing, waxing poetic about Crosley's or Victrola's(same thing), things that look like what my baby sister would have played on. Like the other stores had back then, the locked room with a glass door where the good stuff lay, in there I heard for the first time a four-channel open reel tape on a Teac (3340?) deck, Santana's Caravanserai through Phase Linear 700 amps, I think two of them, an Auto correlator preamp going, to four pairs of Advent speakers, d'appolito style. It changed my life and I still, own a copy of that record I bought back then in great shape plus a newer Speakers Corner copy that I'm not convinced sounds altogether better. Then we listened to Led Zeps Physical Graffiti, "In The Light". We were going to see them live around the same time. We paid fifteen bucks for a ticket that had a face value of seven-fifty which I thought was outrageous. How times have changed. That was a period in my life that I don't think can be replicated today.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sadly, no, those times are in the rearview mirror. I always felt like I was in a high end exotic car dealership when I would visit the High End Audio stores in my city. Even though they never said anything to me, I was very cautious to not touch anything so I could admire all the cool gear without being asked to leave. It was typically playing, so I had no need to do anything to it anyway, I just wanted to hang out as long as possible and daydream about having such a system one day while feeling like I was in a concert. Those back rooms were always dimly lit with ambiance to focus on the sound, but the cool gear would stand out with their cool meters, etc.. Ahhh, memories.

  • @primeanalogrecords
    @primeanalogrecords 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I worked for Pacific Stereo in the early’80’s on Oak Street in Chicago! Great store and I was selling all kinds of brands! It was my first foray into selling hifi and we had gotten the first CD players by Phillips! Also first place I had worked that used a computer system where we could see inventory as well as profit margins! Fun time to grow up! I was 19 years old!

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, you certainly had a University of Stereo education right out of the gate! :-)

    • @primeanalogrecords
      @primeanalogrecords 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stereoniche it was so much fun learning and honing my listening prowess! I have an all analog system with the exception of a CD player! I also have two vintage turntables a Yamaha PX-3 and a Technics SL1610 MKII both from the mid-80’s and a pair of ‘77 Cornwalls that are thrilling to listen to!

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@primeanalogrecords Nice gear!

  • @robertliskey420
    @robertliskey420 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Oh my goodness! I hung out at Pacific Stereo, gee you bring back the old days! They used to let me in the "Very Best" room Did I dream!! Thank you this was special! I just found you and you are becoming a favorite.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome aboard! Take a look at other videos. If you want a trip down memory lane, look for some of the videos that review old audio ads. You will see MANY brands/models you looked at in Pacific Stereo.

  • @allanellis5827
    @allanellis5827 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I am fortunate to own the 16.5 and it is an incredible sounding, monster receiver in near mint condition. I have a collection of highly regarded vintage receivers and this is the last one I would sell. Richard Schramm who later went on to found Parasound was integral to the development of the Concept line of receivers. These are highly collectible and relatively rare. Anyone interested in finding out more can go online as there is some interesting information that people may want to discover. Thank you very much for this review. I very much enjoy your channel.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Allan!

  • @AudioElectronicsChicago
    @AudioElectronicsChicago 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Very underrated brand in general

  • @redbuttonpusher
    @redbuttonpusher 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Oh man, love this unit. I picked one up at an estate sale in Oakland for...$30. It sounds amazing and is my new home stereo/receiver for use with my projector/turntable/cassette deck/ipad music streaming etc.

  • @grassojoe
    @grassojoe 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought my concept 11.0 new when I was in eighth grade maybe and still have it to this day. It still works great. I have not had any problems with it in that amount of time. And I love it. The only problem is it some point in time my face plate got a crack in it. Other than that it’s in perfect condition and it is in my guest room for friends to use when they stay over. I still have my Quadra flex speakers as well that came with it.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing! I hope to find some Quadraflex gear at some point.

  • @mikecampbell5856
    @mikecampbell5856 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When I was stationed in Long Beach and San Diego and for a short time in Mare Island, I used to go to Pacific Stereo stores and drool over the high powered receivers. This was in the 70s during the "Receiver Wars". I also saw my first ever seven foot tall speakers. I think they were Infinitys. I bought my first cassette deck there, a Teac. Great memories Scott!

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Being focused on Stereo, I bet they had every cool offering of the day. In my neck of the woods, they local shops typically carried only a handful of brands, so you had to go to multiple stores to see all offerings.

    • @hugogaldames4156
      @hugogaldames4156 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At my work our neighbors was moving and threw out all their office stuff including a Concept 2.5 reciever we went dumpster diving and found it then we tried it out ,replacing the Sony avr surround sound system,WOW! What a quality 25 watt sounds like. Very clean and clear,impressive!

  • @marvinmurakami8828
    @marvinmurakami8828 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember the Concept receivers well at Pacific Stereo. They boasted impressive specs and seemed to be well made.
    I used to go to Pacific Stereo all the time just to drool over all the speakers and electronics there. I dreamed of having a pair of JBL L100 Centurys but couldnt afford them at the time.

  • @flytown9853
    @flytown9853 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In the 1970's Pacific Stereo was the place I purchased all my stereo equipment, which I still have today, but I didn't know they had their own brand.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Several in-house brands actually, but that was the idea, to make them seem like every other brand in the store except those brands gave them more margin.

  • @spacemissing
    @spacemissing 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Concept receivers were very well engineered, have long
    life expectancy, are easy enough to repair, and sound great.
    The main reason I don't care to own any is their cosmetics,
    especially the sharp-cornered pushbuttons that sometimes get stuck in their apertures.
    If you run across one in good condition that is for sale, grab it before you miss out.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do seem to be a bit bland on the aesthetics side.

    • @AirDOGGe
      @AirDOGGe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stereoniche Function before form. Bland and awesome-sounding over pretty and OK-sounding any day for me. ;-)

  • @multicyclist
    @multicyclist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I visited Pacific Stereo many times in the 70s. I looked at buying the Concept 16.52 receiver, but they did not seem to be able to get them. They tried to sell me an 11.0. But eventually I bought a Kenwood KR-9600 from one of their competitions instead (still have it). Furthermore, I also remember looking at the Concept cassette decks at Pacific Stereo as well.

  • @Silverfaces.
    @Silverfaces. 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very unique design with the dual headphone jacks and the right side power switch. I like the layout.

  • @MashBill
    @MashBill 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    According to the 1990 Orion Audio Blue Book the 11.0 receiver has sold from 1977 to 1982 with an MSRP of $655.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have been trying to get an Orion for reference. Thanks for the confirmation!

    • @AirDOGGe
      @AirDOGGe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I see excellent condition Concept 11.0 units on ebay for $1000 to $1400. Seems high, but it is a rare receiver compared to Marantz and Pioneer. then I check how inflation affects the MSRP and it seems that $655 price would be $2,619 today in 2024 dollars. So maybe those 4-figure prices are fair after all?

  • @billgraves5248
    @billgraves5248 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video Scott. I purchased my 11.0 new in 1977 and it us still going strong. I've also collected all the Concept receuvers except the 2.0 ( still looking for a clean one ) along with the two cassette decks, the turntable and two of the Concept speakers. My good friend worked for Pacific Stereo as a service manager and trainer back in the day. The history of the company and it's downfall is fascinating, someone should write a book about it. I would love to get your impression of your 11.0 and talk to you about it. Oh, and I love your channel and the work you do, thanks.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Bill! I think the 11.0 is kind of the sweet spot, just enough power to run 95% of speakers, but not the TOTL so it is a relative bargain cost wise.

  • @robertliskey420
    @robertliskey420 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My very first high-end came from Pacific Stereo. I just had to have an Empire 598. Took a lot of money for me. It has lived p to it's advertising line, "A silent giant that is built to last...probably forever" Well mine still is going except a belt or light bulbs no service.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Belts/lights are just regular maintenance for those tables. Like plugs and oil for a car. :-)

  • @althepal530
    @althepal530 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have had a Concept 11.0 stereo for about 10 yrs. I ran across it at a second hand store. I took a chance on it because it came with the original box and it was really heavy.
    It’s very understated receiver but it delivers very good sound quality with plenty of power.
    My one dislike it the volume knob detente. It’s either to quiet or too loud.
    I had mine recapped last year. It will stay with me.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is so nice to find units with the original box. They are certainly well built, but understated as you pointed out. Thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @newardthelman6871
    @newardthelman6871 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I worked for Pacific Stereo in Chicago. The chain was purchased by CBS in the late 1970's, not in the 1960's. The Concept private label line was Pacific's "high-end" line, that was an addition to several other private label lines we sold. Those other lines were Quadraflex, Transaudio, and Calibre. The Concept line included large floor standing speakers made by ESS, which featured the ESS Heil Air Motion Transformer tweeter. You should know that we salepeople at the time had a low opinion of all of the private label products - or "prop", as it was called internally by Pacific - that we had to sell. We had to sell a certain percentage of "prop" every month to stay employed. And, we got cash incentives for selling prop, which were called "spiffs". Ironic that people such as you are resurrecting the "prop" that we sneered at back in the day. So naive.

    • @brianmoss5483
      @brianmoss5483 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I still have a Calibre and it works.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Often, the test of time defies the opinion of the day. No matter what the sales people thought of the private label Concept brand, the market thinks otherwise and there is no indication that will change as many have denoted here. Had they been unreliable or had degraded sound quality, they would have all found their way to the landfill like others that fit that description.

    • @loren_3015
      @loren_3015 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I worked at Pacific Stereo in California in 79-80. There was also a proprietary brand called Reference.

  • @peterflores1012
    @peterflores1012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 4 trak player from concept as well as some speakers that I sold a few years back. There ia a concept turntable as well 2QD was the name

  • @Shaken_AND_Stirred
    @Shaken_AND_Stirred 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pacific Stereo was big in the Houston area during the 1970’s. They had a big competitor with the same store type concept. I can’t recall the name of it though. It may have been “CMC Stereo” or something like that; maybe not.
    I used to love to go into Pacific Stereo. Looking back, I find all of the carpeted shelves (as I remember them, but may be mistaken) with just tons of stereo gear. It was a great store and concept for the time. The stores were not very big at all though, at least in the Houston area.

  • @brianmoss5483
    @brianmoss5483 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alas the pacific stereo I used to go to in San Francisco turned into a Mel’s drive in restaurant. Minus the car hops on roller skates.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, at least you can get a milkshake and pretend you are at a Pacific Stereo store. :-)

    • @robertliskey420
      @robertliskey420 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mine was in Hayward!

    • @AirDOGGe
      @AirDOGGe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Our huge PS became a SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET (Mountain View)

  • @mistert7958
    @mistert7958 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I bought a 3.5 (35 wpc) along with the amazing Infinity Monitor Jr speakers at Pacific Stereo in Milwaukee in '76. They had a trade up policy whereby you coud trade for a larger model and get full credit, I think for 90 days. I did trade up to the 5.5 (55 wpc). Good move, because those Infinity's were power hungry. I still have those, my brother has the Concept today. I haunted that store for months while saving up the cash. Carlos, the sales guy, was a dick, tho.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That damn Carlos. :-)

  • @jp93309
    @jp93309 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wish Pacific Stereo was still around today now that I have adult money to spend. 😢

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably a LOT of others feel the same way. Sadly, a bygone era.

  • @tomsettles6873
    @tomsettles6873 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought a 4.5 Concept new in 1977 and returned it because the FM tuner was not very good. The reception was lousy. (My neighbors had Marantz and Pioneer receivers that had better reception.) I tested the 5.5 and found that its tuner was much better, so I paid $60 - $70 extra and exchanged the 4.5 for the 5.5. The sound quality was also much better with the 5.5. The technician working at Pacific Stereo told me that the tuner for the 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 is basically the same, and the 5.5 and 6.5 share circuitry of the 11.0 and 16.5 but with a 4 gang tuner instead of the 5 gang tuner found in the 11.0 and 16.5. So if you're looking to buy one of these in 2024, I would avoid the lower wattage Concepts. The 5.5 and 6.5 are probably the best bang for the buck.

  • @TheFalcondan95705
    @TheFalcondan95705 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have had Marantz 2010, 2040, 2265b,2330. and 2385, Mcintosh MC250, Sansui Au and tu 919.. The Concept Sound better in my opinion.... I love it..

  • @phils7463
    @phils7463 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They also offered the CE-H headphones(which I am a very happy owner of) and CE-1,2 and CE-H speakers. The speakers were designed for concept by ESS. If anyone is selling any please let me know lol

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So it seems they pretty much had a full line of stereo products. I don't think anyone has confirmed a reel to reel.

  • @TheFalcondan95705
    @TheFalcondan95705 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think they were 699.00////

  • @wheeliewadethiesen2946
    @wheeliewadethiesen2946 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought that receiver from pacific stereo in 1979 on the southside of Chicago. I’m pretty sure it was right off of Route 30 in Richton Park but not positive. Seems like I paid $700 for it brand new also the concept speakers with the heil motion, transformer. Probably not spell correctly but it had a 10 inch subwoofer tennis woofer and the transformer which produced amazing sound. Thanks just reminiscing I gave my stereo equipment away before I moved to Tennessee and now I’m kicking myself I have DCM time frames DCM time windows the concept, 11.0, infinity cap at eight speakers And other speakers, I just gave them all away. I’m the stupidest person on earth. 😩

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LOL, well, don't kick yourself too hard, we would ALL love the chance to undo quite a few things from our past. The good news is that you CAN re-acquire old vintage gear though. 🙂

    • @wheeliewadethiesen2946
      @wheeliewadethiesen2946 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now I’m awake I see all my voice typos 😂 I won’t even edit the comment, concept had some excellent speakers. They still worked when I gave them away the foam need a replacement, but I remember they had an adjustment for the mid range and high end for the ribbon type midrange and high end and cool little LED, red and green lights which were pretty neat back then.

  • @soundman2604
    @soundman2604 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had the 16.5, 2-11.0, 12.0D. 11.0 sounded better than the 16.5

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting. Many who have had the opportunity to hear several models within a line often recommend the upper tier brethren over the TOTL model. For example, the Pioneer SX-1280 over the SX-1980. Thanks for commenting.

  • @bertroost1675
    @bertroost1675 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I am not a fan of those giant late 70's receivers. I find the less known late 60's early 70's low wattage solid state receivers to be very nice, and much cheaper.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The late 60's era had some great units and they are typically much less expensive, agree.

    • @bertroost1675
      @bertroost1675 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stereoniche I think (only think, I don't really know) that the early solid state was designed by older tube amp designers and they tried to make them sound like tube amplification but as the decade went the newer engineers/designers started looking at power rather more than sound. I could be wrong though, I often am😅

    • @jeffbranch8072
      @jeffbranch8072 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm right there! I'm **loving** the low power end of vintage audio. I've had a Pioneer SX-434 since it was given to me in 1979 (I was 14), along with a PL-10 turntable and pair of Ohm Model E 2-way speakers. It's only been recently since I got into "vintage audio" that I learned it's a low powered, entry level model. The whole set is entry level. I never knew that. Never cared. I always loved it, it sounds good, plenty loud, I rarely go past about 1/4 of the Volume knob travel. And for considerably less than the cost of a single monster receiver I can try small receivers of a few other brands. I've recently bought a Harman/Kardon 330B, and would like to get a Sansui next. It seems that in some series the lower powered units actually can sound better without all those Watts getting in the way. LOL!

    • @jeffbranch8072
      @jeffbranch8072 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Also, if you look at total sales volume, I don't believe the monster receivers were ever what paid the bills at these companies. They were to demonstrate engineering capability (maybe) and in the stereo wars a matter of oneupmanship and bragging rights (definitely). My receiver can beat up your receiver. But it was the medium and lower powered units that they sold in volume. It's like the Corvette. Chevrolet would go out of business in short order if they only sold Corvettes, but the presence of the Corvette on showroom floors helps sell the more mundane models by association. And that's where they made their money.

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jeffbranch8072 It is all about "quality" watts, not just having a LOT of watts, most often.

  • @insolentstickleback3266
    @insolentstickleback3266 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    test

    • @stereoniche
      @stereoniche  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Test confirmed.