Which Modlite PL350 Head Is For You? | PLHv2, OKW, PLH5k

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ต.ค. 2021
  • Which Modlite PL350 pistol light head is right for you? We do an in-depth comparison of the PLHv2, PLH5k, and OKW. Which one has the longest runtime? The most candela? Brightest output? Find out in this light lab video.
    More data at: www.lowlightdefense.com/which...
    Buy a holster for your pistol and light: werkz.com/
    Buy a Modlite PL350: modlite.com/collections/pisto...
  • กีฬา

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @e7tegt503
    @e7tegt503 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    This channel = flashlight geek meets gun enthusiast. Nice work.

  • @BoostedFrancisco
    @BoostedFrancisco 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    PLH5k for handguns and CQB applications, PLHV2 and OKW for rifles.

  • @Pyreleaf
    @Pyreleaf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Once I learned about how modlite was smoking the competition, my plan was OKW for .308, PLHv2 for 5.56, and PLH5k for 9mm.

    • @zone6ea404
      @zone6ea404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Marshmallows are yummy in my tummy tum

    • @WoodrowWoods2007
      @WoodrowWoods2007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m not sure I’d ever want the OKW. It has almost no spill, but def more candela than the others. I guess that would work if you’re trying to PID at ONLY 100 yards away. I chose the PLHv2, for my pistol but wish i would have waited for the PLH5K :/
      For my AR-15, I’m still looking at the Cloud Defensive OWL. But time will tell

    • @guitaristguy20
      @guitaristguy20 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WoodrowWoods2007 I hate my CD rein.

    • @paraglidingnut26
      @paraglidingnut26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@guitaristguy20 Could you explain why that is?

  • @Truckboy383
    @Truckboy383 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These flashlight reviews are just as awesome as your holsters and are both very much appreciated.

  • @777luckyme
    @777luckyme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was exactly what I needed to decide on which one to get, gave me the information that I needed

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was our intent! Make it useful for folks such as you trying to decide!

  • @SnapD24
    @SnapD24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks for the work you put into this. I really needed to see how the PLH5k compared to other heads, and it seems that's the one I really want after all.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for the feedback! My intent with this video was to help folks like you come to an informed conclusion on which light head is right for you.

  • @Steven_M.
    @Steven_M. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the premium content and information.

  • @pcs3576
    @pcs3576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation and thorough presentation.

  • @EverydayGentsEDC
    @EverydayGentsEDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great info! Seen your Surefire X300 video and your previous Modlite video and i got to say that i trust your opinion and data over other reviewers!

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Thank you. Our desire is to be neutral and fair so that you can make an informed decision.

    • @EverydayGentsEDC
      @EverydayGentsEDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@WerkzHolsters that goes a long way in my book. Thank you and keep up the great work and vids!

  • @GldenRetriever
    @GldenRetriever 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My first light was a PLHv2, but I currently run the OKW on my PL350. I wasn't too interested in the PLH5k before this video, but now I am having second thoughts.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The PLH5k is a lot wider than the other two... possibly depends upon your environment.

  • @thebogwalker
    @thebogwalker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is amazing!!!

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @LukeHuchMusic
    @LukeHuchMusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic video!!!!

  • @Towarddev
    @Towarddev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Work! Thx for the comparison:)

  • @WvMnts
    @WvMnts ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content!! Thank You

  • @JeremyRyanFit
    @JeremyRyanFit 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great analysis!

  • @rickyricardo5441
    @rickyricardo5441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great review. Really helps us get an idea of which light to get. Cant wait to see what Cloud does with the new lights though,

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm anxious to see what Cloud does as well.

    • @johnathankim6721
      @johnathankim6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think cloud’s lights will be similar to the PLHK5 and the OKW.

  • @Blankford777
    @Blankford777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PLH5K perfect for a pistol light (PL350). OKW and PLHV2 perfect on rifles. I've only owned the PLHV2 and PLH5K until now so I'm excited to try out the OKW. I tested all 3 in my backyard last night but heavy mist/fog washed them all out, could hardly tell the difference in any of them which is crazy considering how different they are. Light performance impacted by weather conditions is a super important factor to consider as well.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seems like you have a good handle on how to use these heads for your needs. And yes, environmental conditions are one of the key things to think about. Good feedback!

  • @dancastle9791
    @dancastle9791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting to see that the 5k looks like it’s actually close to the advertised lumen output.

  • @smashedhulk8492
    @smashedhulk8492 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done.

  • @oliverallen5324
    @oliverallen5324 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you realize the Okw adds a “blind” and semi-stun to your presentation, it’s actually the best at actual fighting.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  ปีที่แล้ว

      When I run a Modlite, it usually has the OKW on it.

  • @coffeeandlifting
    @coffeeandlifting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is it. I love that someone is doing this with weapon lights. There used to be a couple blogs that did testing of this quality with handhelds a few years ago, but even that stuff has disappeared for the most part. I especially like the candela at angle charts. Very useful in quantifying beam profile. Another test that I've done myself on a few lights which you might consider is repeat startup output testing to see how well the light returns to full output after it has been run to its step-down. This is a "realistic" output test since lights are cycled on and off during real use. Most lights perform well in returning to full output, but I haven't seen much data on these newer lights that have very high outputs. Thanks for doing all of this work!

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's an excellent suggestion. I'll see if we can integrate. TBH, there are so many lights, that simply getting decent lumen and candela data on all lights is tough enough. If I can figure out how to standardize something like this, then probably we can integrate. Great feedback!

    • @coffeeandlifting
      @coffeeandlifting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The way I used to do the test on my own lights (to satisfy my own curiosity) is to run them to the first programmed step-down and then power off for a determined amount of time before repeating. The output charts generated might only be 1-2 minutes each, but you can take a higher sample rate of output during the shorter duration to get a detailed view of that first couple minutes of the runtime in which you will spend most of your time in during real use. Total runtime at full power will be much lower and would also be an interesting data point. But again, the content you're already producing is above and beyond anything else available on this topic and I'm subbed.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@coffeeandlifting Thanks for the input. It's giving me some ideas...

  • @tiberiusvonwolf5520
    @tiberiusvonwolf5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent vid! I'm still waiting for them to make a hand focusable head so I could make the light have a wider spill for when indoors and when I'm outside I could focus it down to really see in the distance

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's interesting. Does Modlite have something like that planned?

    • @tiberiusvonwolf5520
      @tiberiusvonwolf5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WerkzHolsters If they don't already then they should

    • @christianmiranda23
      @christianmiranda23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My theory as to why no one else except Maglite is doing that is bc Maglite has a patent on it. I have absolutely no research to support this theory though. I use Maglite as reference to my customers when explaining the difference between lumens and candela

  • @christianmiranda23
    @christianmiranda23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If the guys at work knew about these videos, I'd never hear the end of it. They already call me "the ilLUMENator".

  • @IDK_what_TO_call_IT_
    @IDK_what_TO_call_IT_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Still think the plhv2 is the way for everything 100-150yds and in. Even on a pistol.

  • @eddiearchuleta615
    @eddiearchuleta615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plhv2 pl350

  • @gprojectnoob4779
    @gprojectnoob4779 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparisons. I do disagree somewhat with all these high candela lights for close up work. They are great for outdoors at distance. Go to 7:03 . Now imagine a scenario where you enter the room and there are 3 purps each about 8 ft from each other and you flash your light on the guy in the middle. Would you rather have the surefire or the modlite? With the Modlite you cant even see 8 ft from him. With the Surefire the whole area is lit up. Lumens is the LED or light source and candela is the reflector. If you want to see how many pimples the guy in the 7ft wide beam has then you want go for the high candela focused beam. If you want to see that he is a guy with a gun and he has a couple friends to his side 9-10ft then a wide , lower candela but same lumen beam is better i think.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree that when outside, and there is nothing to reflect off of, many of the highly focused lights don't provide enough spill for such a scenario. Indoors has the benefit of walls / ceiling / floor to bounce off of. Like all things, lights have tradeoffs, and everyone has a different set of concerns.

  • @08pileggi
    @08pileggi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you guys done the plh5k vs tlr1 hl?!

  • @likeris2
    @likeris2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need light for defence when I am walking in dark streets for blindenning. what would you recommend? I like PLHv2, but not sure is it works for that kind of settings.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All 3 of these heads are strong. If you want the most focused hotspot to blind someone, the OKW has the highest candela.

  • @TinkerTailorSoldier1
    @TinkerTailorSoldier1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Think you’ll ever test some Malkoff Devices heads? Think any of those are a good alternative for Surefire & Modlite?

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We are happy to queue up tests for any of the mid to high end manufacturers. There are quite a few folks out there, and I've not personally investigated Malkoff. You have any contacts there?

  • @casey5018
    @casey5018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone know if these modlites on glocks fit a safariland holster?

  • @Stealther
    @Stealther 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the OKW is too focused for short to midrange engagements. It seems that you either are able to disorient the subject or see what he’s doing with his hands but not both at the same time at those distances. I think the PLHV2 is a decent compromise and will go with that for everything but my rifle. That will get an OKW.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your inputs!

    • @Stealther
      @Stealther 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WerkzHolsters of course after I said that, I bought a handheld 18650 OKW as a defensive light when in NPEs. I figured I wanted as much disabling light as possible in those instances.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Stealther Thanks for circling back and letting us know what you decided! I think that "painful+" effect on subjects is real.

  • @Slipknotfanatic89
    @Slipknotfanatic89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m curious if the PLH5k is any different than the original PLH heads

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We don't have an original on hand to test, unfortunately.

  • @MGirute
    @MGirute 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There should be some new lights coming out in shot show. Right?
    Modlight is beast in the meantime

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm hoping we will see some new stuff on the market. Cloud has been teasing their handheld, so maybe they'll get us something for pistol soon...

  • @warriorworkstraining
    @warriorworkstraining 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's a shame the 5k was discontinued

  • @rodrigoroaduterte9415
    @rodrigoroaduterte9415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, finally I know the difference.

  • @paulvaden6990
    @paulvaden6990 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are these the same heads that the rifle lights use?

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe those are the 3 heads that Modlite has, and I understand the same heads are used handheld, pistol, or rifle. Actually Modlite has 4 heads, but one is IR.

  • @CVPI03
    @CVPI03 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    would the 5k light head fit on their carbine light?

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would ask Modlite directly for a definitive answer. However, my guess is "yes". The heads all interchange on my handheld and all interchange on the PL350 pistol light. Hope that helps!

  • @VulcanXIV
    @VulcanXIV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    anyone know why the 5k was discontinued?

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would be curious as well if anyone knows the answer...

  • @TheDragonDelasangre
    @TheDragonDelasangre ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why is the 5K head gone?

    • @alphacentary
      @alphacentary ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm asking the same question. It might be discontinued.

  • @johnathankim6721
    @johnathankim6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you ever get it figured out regarding modlite products not actually putting out the numbers stated by them?

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope. Though I've heard from another light manufacturer that Modlite has started removing claims or changing the output claims on the Modlite site... could be just rumor.

    • @johnathankim6721
      @johnathankim6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WerkzHolsters gotcha. Yeah I’m torn. I want the new CD items. But only downside I have if that CD isn’t coming out with a light with similar numbers to the PLHV2 which are numbers I’d prefer.

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnathankim6721 I agree! The question is how they compare head to head in the lab and in real world use. I'll probably just test the Cloud direct to the Modlite and TLR-1HL and see how it does.

    • @johnathankim6721
      @johnathankim6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WerkzHolsters looking forward to that review!

    • @johnathankim6721
      @johnathankim6721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope to see your review of the new cloud defensive heads!

  • @mannyzuccarelli
    @mannyzuccarelli 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Solid as fak!

  • @henryliu1046
    @henryliu1046 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats a far cry from the 54k advertised candela from modlite

    • @WerkzHolsters
      @WerkzHolsters  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think all the light manufacturers are having trouble meeting candela claims. What may be more important is to get a data using the same test rig (mine) for comparison purposes. Most people cannot tell the difference between 54,000cd and 30,000cd without lab equipment. And that may be why we see so many lights falling short of claims -- no one is out there to dispute the ratings.

  • @KidWitHearts
    @KidWitHearts 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Till this day, the subject is blind.